Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Erika De La Rosa
Professor Beadle
English 115
30 September 2018
through different methods. Internal spaces such as our mindset or external spaces like our
environment can affect whether we are happy or not. Journalist Graham Hill emphasizes how to
better ourselves and live happier by focusing on an external space and discussing how being
materialistic can be harmful meanwhile journalist David Brooks and psychology professor Sonja
Lyubomirsky claim that one can live happier by putting emphasis on internal space and arguing
happiness depends on us and whether we view life through a positive lens. However,
Lyubomirsky contradicts her claim by highlighting how genetics play a significant role in our
happiness. Despite her counterclaim, she ultimately stresses that happiness is achievable through
Graham Hill, a journalist and entrepreneur who devotes his life to sustainability, explores
an external space in which he explains how materials can harm us. For example, Hill anecdotes
to a time where he details, “…I felt more anxious than before. My life was unnecessarily
complicated.” (Hill 309). Hill describes how his materials consumed his life to the point where
he no longer felt at peace. He evokes a sense of dejection when describing his emotions,
allowing us to better understand and visualize the internal turmoil he was experiencing as a result
of feeling suffocated by his materialistic lifestyle. This further emphasizes how external factors
such as materials can deeply affect our mentality and therefore interfere with our happiness. In
De La Rosa 2
addition, Hill utilizes research conducted by U.C.L.A to show how “…mothers’ stress hormones
spiked during the time they spent dealing with their belongings.” (Hill 310). The mother’s stress
hormones spiked because they didn’t know how to deal with their possessions. Hill implies that
we can change the space in which we live in by reducing the number of things we own therefore
we won’t feel trapped by our consumption. Graham Hill employs ethos when he explains how
affected he was due to his excessive possessions, “…my experiences show material objects have
a tendency to crowd out emotional needs…” (Hill 311-312). His desire to own all of the latest
gadgets made him experience firsthand how being materialistic can cause more harm than
satisfaction. Furthermore, Hill emphasizes that a clean environment equates to a happy mentality
because our happiness can be affected as a result of the environment we live in.
David Brooks, a journalist with a B.A. in history, utilizes historical figures to highlight
how internal spaces such as suffering can positively influence us to achieve happiness. For
example, David Brooks uses historical evidence when he states that “Franklin Roosevelt came
back more empathetic after being struck with polio.” (Brooks 284). Brooks utilizes Roosevelt’s
sickness to emphasize how Roosevelt had struggles in life but created a positive perspective from
it. His new outlook on life made him more compassionate, therefore when the United States was
struggling because of the Great Depression, Roosevelt enacted the New Deal to help relieve the
nation’s misery. He changed his internal self by learning from his misery and was eventually
successful because of the positivity it led him to. In addition, Brooks stresses how one’s actions
can make us happier by stating, “…the right response to this sort of pain… is trying to redeem
something bad by turning it into something sacred.” (Brooks 286). He is explaining how
suffering can have a positive impact if it is redeemed as a learning experience to better our lives.
Furthermore, Brooks utilizes insight from former the psychologist and concentration camp
De La Rosa 3
survivor Viktor Frankl when he references how “…prisoners in the concentration camp
rededicated themselves to living up to the hopes and expectations of their loved ones…” (Brooks
286). This shows how some of the most tortured people to ever live had a positive outlook
despite the trauma they endured. Through suffering the prisoners transformed their misery into
positivity which gave them hope. Internal factors like our struggles can have a positive impact on
our happiness but only if we transform them into something positive, for example, turning
Unlike previous statements made by Hill and Brooks, psychology professor Sonja
Lyubomirsky explores internal space through the connection between happiness and genetics.
present the fact that, “…happiness is largely genetically determined.” (Lyubomirsky 188). The
research puts into perspective how much ability people actually have to dictate their happiness.
This shows we can’t suddenly decide to be happy because it’s determined before we’re born.
Moreover, the gene 5-HTTLPR, specifically the short version of it, can increase our chances of
obtaining depression (Lyubomirsky 192). Our genetics are irreversible therefore it is impossible
to completely avoid certain factors that may prevent us from obtaining complete happiness.
Despite all the efforts we may go through in order to achieve complete happiness if we carry the
5-HTTLPR gene, our happiness will be interrupted. Furthermore, Lyubomirsky employs logos
when she defines happy set points as, “…genetically determined set points are, by definition,
resistant to change, influence or control.” (Lyubomirsky 193). Lyubomirsky further stresses how
we have limited control over our happiness. Internal factors like genetics will always play a key
Happiness can be achievable by exploring one’s internal space of behavior and attitude.
Sonja Lyubomirsky relies on logos when she refers to Aristotle’s writing by stating, “…an
example stresses how the idea that our happiness lies within our perspective can be proven true
because he was a genius. Lyubomirsky is emphasizing how our attitude can determine our
happiness. A positive attitude will lead to more joy meanwhile a negative one is more likely to
create misery. She also uses experience from people she previously surveyed when she describes
how despite having endured a hard life Randy is, “…an eternal optimist claims that seeing the
silver lining in the cloud has been his key to survival…” (Lyubomirsky 181). Using Randy as an
example stresses the importance that being an optimist can benefit our happiness levels. This
further emphasizes how we can transform our external space of struggles into an internal space
that consists of happiness. To further conclude, Lyubomirsky, points out that, “…if you want to
be happy tomorrow… you can do it by choosing to change and manage your state of mind.”
(Lyubomirsky 185). Being a psychology professor Lyubomirsky is well educated on the fact that
our brain is an important tool that is used when achieving happiness. She is emphasizing how
Overall our happiness won’t always be the same because our levels of joy can be affected
by different spaces. Journalist Graham Hill explores how one’s environment can affect our joy
while journalist David Brooks and psychology professor Sonja Lyubomirsky explore factors
such as our outlook on life and hardships to emphasize how they hugely impact whether we
achieve happiness or not. The examples and arguments presented by Hill, Brooks, and
Lyubomirsky further prove that it is up to us to decide whether we want to live happy because
Brooks, David. What Suffering Does. Pursuing happiness, Edited by Matthew Parfitt and Dawn
Hill, Graham. Living with Less. A Lot Less. Pursuing Happiness, edited by Matthew Parfitt and
Lyubomirsky, Sonja. How Happy Are You and Why?. Pursuing Happiness, edited by Matthew