Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Matthew Perez
Professor Granillo
English 101
18 October 2018
Texting is big right now in the 21st century as something that is done every day at every
second in life and phone calls are happening way less which is changing communication between
people indefinitely. In the article “No Need to Call” by Sherry Turkle, Turkle explains her intel
on the need to only text instead of calling which to her is quite unnecessary because she refers to
texting as fast, easy and a way to feel more confident. She argues that in today's circumstances
texting is a way to go rather than calling because of its convenience rather than what she claims
as a “phone call asks too much, they worry it will be received as demanding too much” (Turkle
507). In relation to ethos, logos, and pathos, Turkle is mostly motivated by pathos with her
emotions and personal experience. Although Sherry Turkle suggests in her article “No Need to
Call” that texting is a great alternative to calling because of her personal feelings and
experiences, some may suggest that Turkle is being too personally motivated and does not
realize the consequences that texting has; consequently people especially teenagers need to be
encouraged to talk on the phone more to express true emotions, improve communication skills
Turkle’s motivation came from the people and the world around her as she noticed a
decrease in phone calls from all her friends and many people she knew. There is one of many
reasons that calling is too intrusive in many situations, especially nowadays with the easy
Perez 2
alternative of social media and email. An example Turkle uses is from a friend that she quotes
saying “ At dinner, Joyce said that she had thought of calling to congratulate me, but a call had
seemed “instructive” (Turkle 508). This represents a piece of many sorts of problems that are
being created by texting and giving the young generation an excuse to not speak to one another.
Reasons like this also just create problems between people who don't speak and don't get the full
experience of communication. Having this type of habit incorporated into young people's minds
is creating bigger problems for people. With the emotion they feel, they are becoming less
motivated to speak and share their feelings with one another. Turkle refers to others a lot in many
situations by using their experiences with phone calls which is why they prefer texting because
they claim texting gives them the opportunity to think and hide behind an invisible wall.
Therefore the teen generation is allowing their emotions to prevent them from communicating
along with decreasing their communication skills. With the lack of any communication, teens of
today will not be able to communicate when they need to or are required too giving them fewer
Expressing emotions over the phone is one of the best ways of getting a message and tone
across to another person. Turkle in her article mentions that people can express emotions through
simply texting and using grammar to express their feelings. Texting is simply not a good use of
communication to understand the emotions someone is feeling. Joseph Saur explains in an article
reviewed by older adults that “We have learned that talking is more satisfying than texting, and
visits trueness over voice” (Saur 2). This represents a view from many experienced people who
have spoken over the phone many times and have really experienced the full story of
communication rather than forcing a message through some words over text. Also explaining the
Perez 3
better representation that speaking on the phone allows, which is found to be a way easier way to
communicate with someone. Speaking over the phone allows the other person to understand and
hear emotions like tone, speaking pace, and verbal language. Overall expressing emotion through
the phone is the best way to get a message across to someone who may not be fully aware of
Speaking on the phone directly benefits the clarity in conversations and allows people to
talk more generally though verbal communication rather than just text message. In many
situations, people are prone to just keeping thoughts to themselves and decide to send a text
message instead of contacting the person verbally. Having to speak on the phone allows space
for clarity in a conversation, which improves their communication skills. In reference to people
who have learned from calling, they state “Many business people testify that talking on the
phone offers new possibilities to fix up business appointments, arrange for wares to be delivered
and develop clear time schedules” (Brinkman). It's been proven to older people that
communicating on the phone can enhance a clarity aspect that texting cannot do at any level.
peoples speaking styles. Overall, talking on the phone is an experience that can be a much better
alternative to texting by which itself just promotes people to adapt to using the textspeak
language.
By always texting it’s causing many people especially young teens to start speaking and
writing in textspeak, defined as the language of the internet. In the article “Text Speak and
Personality Perceptions” explains the issue about the impact of textspeak by claiming “Text
Speak users may even receive less positive evaluations in more informal,
Perez 4
the individual based on what they write” (Fullwood 2). Texting is what Sherry is promoting as a
good thing opposed to talking on the phone, but as research suggests, texting is influencing
textspeak in writing which is impacting the way young people speak, communicate, and write.
Technology is literally negatively affecting the way young people get jobs, even after college.
Therefore, texting is impacting them in the outside world when they need to use their writing and
communication skills that they learned, which would be lost due to the adaptation of the
textspeak language.
Talking over the phone is the best alternative to texting, although some may agree with
Turkle that texting is the best way to get information across rather than talking on the phone.
That’s not a reasonable solution to communication but actually a worse way to communicate
because it’s causing people to write differently in textspeak by using terms like LOL, JK, and
IDK. Academics also note that some Internet language, which may have initially been expected
to remain restricted to text-based communications like “(e.g., acronyms such as ‘‘LOL’’), are
now being spoken” (Fullwood 2). This is the textspeak that is being spoken and written by many
teens in their everyday lives, which is not helping them improve their communication skills for
their future selves. Including the now commonly used “internet language” which shows the
unfortunate direction new young people are going towards. Referencing this type of language is
only really necessary in a brief text, but applying this language to speaking conversations and
writing is not a good way of communicating. Speaking and writing in those ways is creating a
new language that is not taught in school because it's not needed for anyone's future in the
Sherry Turkle’s audience is faced towards the younger crowd of people that seem to be in
between the era of mixed phone calls and texting. Turkle herself is deeply involved in the texting
era which is her preference for communication. She displays a picture in her article of four
teenagers using their phones to text or involved in any sort of social media, she quotes
“Teenagers plugged into their devices but not each other” (Turkle 510). Sherry Turkle herself
even admits a side of opposition by displaying and saying what texting is doing to the new
generation of people. She refers to a friend that experiences the same perspective as seeing no
point in calling for the reason that it's inconvenient and a way to be themselves. This relates to
people needing to improve their communication skills that are becoming reluctantly bad because
of their in communication from only texting. In addition to her claim, she only presents herself
and her friends that experience the same level attitude towards the simple life of texting. Her
audience is limited in only the direction that texting is better for those who are like her and want
All in all, Sherry Turkle was being to personally motivated in her article only stating
what she believed was great for her in terms of texting and the people who had stories in direct
correlation to hers. Texting is causing people to use text speak, and become weaker in terms of
their communication skills. Turkle visualized calling someone as a nuisance and was only
necessary to get an important topic across. She didn't fully see the full advantages to calling on
the phone and the impact of clear communication that is transferred over a call. In describing the
alternatives to texting, Communication over the phone verbally is the best way to express
emotion and get a real one to one conversation that will positively influence their communication
skills. So despite the general knowledge of the convenience of text messaging, just calling
Perez 6
someone on the phone rather than texting can only bring more clarity and trueness into a
conversation that will benefit anyone more than they imagined simply by just talking on the
phone.
Perez 7
Works Cited
Brinkman, Inge. “Mobile Phones: The New Talking Drums of Everyday Africa”. Nyamnjoh,
Francis B. Bruijn, Mirjam de. eBook Collection Bamenda, Cameroon. 2009, pg. 23-24.
Fullwood, Chris. “Put on a Smiley Face: Textspeak and Personality Perceptions”. Proquest. Vol
Saur, Joseph. “Talking Still Beats Texting”. Knowles, Bran Hanson, Vicki L.Communications of
the ACM, Vol. 61 Issue 5, Business Source Elite, May 2018, pp.10-11.
Turkle, Sherry. “No Need To Call”. “They Say I Say” Edited by Gerald Graff, Cathy