Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Bailey Turner
English 115
23 September 2018
What does it mean to be happy? For most people, the answer relies on how we go about
our lives and the spaces we inhabit. To be more precise, each person has a different approach on
how they better themselves in hopes that they might live a happy and fulfilling life. This idea is
best exemplified by the works of David Brook’s, “What Suffering Does,” Graham Hill’s,
“Living with Less. A Lot Less.”, and Sonja Lyubomirsky’s, “How Happy Are You and Why.”
All of these authors come from varying backgrounds, a wide range of opinions, and with one
thing in common in their essays; How to better ourselves and how exactly we might be able to do
that.
From the beginning, the first author we glance at focusses on spaces that are
circumstances that affect our lives rather then the actual physical it is instead the emotional
growth that come from it. In the David Brooks article, “What Suffering Does” he analyzes the
idea of space in a more emotionally challenging sense. In most definitions of the word, “space” it
is often associated with time and physicality. Merriam Webster’s Dictionary defines “space” as,
“a limited extent in one, two, or three dimensions.” However, this isn’t entirely true since space
can be one’s emotional state or a moment in time and the circumstances or situations that might
come from it. Brook’s article he discusses an aspect of this as he explains that people’s
Turner 2
perspectives on life are affected when they go through a great deal of suffering. This can be one
having their entire world altered due to some form of event that has changed their life for either
the worse or the better. These circumstances allow people to remove their rose-tinted glasses and
figure out what matters in their life and what doesn’t. A notable example Brooks chose to use
was his references to the presidencies of Abraham Lincoln and Franklin D. Roosevelt. Brooks
starts by pointing out a very human situation, “Think of the way Franklin Roosevelt came back
deeper and more empathetic after being struck with polio."(Brooks 284) and later with a more
drastic situation using the event of a president dealing with a wore-torn country, “Abraham
suffered through the pain of conducting a civil war, and he came out of that with the Second
Inaugural." (Brooks 286). These men both went through events that are unbearable too most, but
rather than allowing these incidents to rule their livelihoods they chose to better themselves and
It is important also to point out that within Brook’s articles, he illustrates a clear picture
of what it means to have our lives altered for the better over difficult situations by pointing out
two influential presidents you’ve learned about in school using something quite familiar and
something that has a historical aspect as well. Another example using this method is Brooks
using the mention of the surviving victims of the Holocaust, “Prisoners in the concentration
camp with the psychologist, Victor Frankl rededicated themselves to living up to the hopes and
expectations of the loved ones, even though they might themselves already be dead.” (Brooks
286) This example shows a concept we’ve heard about time and time again, a lack of human
understanding towards others and coming out of this atrocity stronger as individuals rather than
Except what about us? The regular individuals who don’t have to deal with wars,
stressful presidencies, or the scrutiny of others? What about the people who struggle with
alcoholism, depression, cancer, or any other coincidences that might occur in our lives
unexpectedly? In Brooks article once again he refers to this concept and references what happens
to us by using words from a theologian. “The theologian Paul Tillich wrote that people who
endure suffering are taken beneath the routines of life and find they are not who believed
themselves to be.”(Brooks 285) This quote from the article is the basic idea of a space in time
and how it affects our emotions. If we allow ourselves to get past the hardships that occur in our
lives, here is a chance we might be able to come out of it as better people who are more
grounded individuals, and we shouldn’t fear the negative but in fact, embrace it.
Moving backs towards, the more physical aspect of the concept of space. Glancing at
Graham Hill’s article, “Living with Less. A Lot Less.” analyzes the power of living in homes
with a minimalistic outlook. This article is also an external look at space. Hill defines it best by
referencing to his actual life, “I live in a 420 square feet studio. I sleep in a bed that folds down
from the wall. I have six shirts. I have 10 shallow bowls that I use for salads and main dishes.
When people come over for dinner, I pull out my extendable dining room table. I don’t have a
single CD or DVD and I have 10 percent of books I once did.”(Hill 308) Now, why does the
Since space is something that can be physical, there are environmental factors that affect
us. For example, some people like Hill believe that the phrase “more money means more
problems” is something worth looking at. In Hill’s essay, he speaks in great detail about his love
affair with materialism a well as of juxtaposing his first sentence and making it personal, “I
Turner 4
bought a four-story, 3,600 square foot, turn-of-the-century house in Seattle’s happening Capitol
Hill neighborhood and, in a frenzy of consumption, bought a brand new sectional couch (my first
ever), a pair of $300 sunglasses, a ton of gadgets, like an Audible.com Mobile Player (one of the
first portable digital music players) and an audiophile-worthy five-disc CD player. And of
course, a black turbo-charged Volvo. With a remote starter!” (Hill 308 – 309) This list is used to
exemplify just how much he owned to make him feel happy. Except in his article, he continues
to point out his slow venture into the mundanity of living excess creature comforts. “My success
and things it bought quickly changed from novel to normal." (Hill 309) He lets the audience
understand the progression of his happiness slowing down and him becoming unsatisfied with
life.
A question someone might be wondering is why is this such a bad thing? Most believe
that owning so much when so many have so little is greedy and end up not caring about what you
have due to having so much. Although another problem that often occurs is being able to manage
and organize everything. Hill speaks of his struggles with this very issue. “My life was
unnecessarily complicated. There were lawns to mow, gutters to clear, floors to vacuum,
roommates to manage (it seemed nuts to have such a big, empty house.), a car to insure, wash,
refuel, repair and register and tech to set up and keep working.” (Hill 309) Transitioning back to
space, if our environment is not a positive and calming environment we often will find ourselves
becoming more stressed. Hill argues that having fewer things might benefit too our environment
is having less, so there is less to deal with allowing you to focus on yourself rather than the
Finally, what happens when you look at the concept of space in all of its aspects? In
Turner 5
Sonja Lyubomirsky article, “How Happy Are You and Why?” she examines why exactly some
people are happy all the time and why others are not. Unlike the other authors who used personal
experiences, reference, and external sources, Lyubomirsky uses her experience as a psychologist
For example, in Lyubomirsky’s article, she examines the lives of various people like
Angela; “Angela is thirty-four and one of the happiest people that I ever interviewed.”
(Lyubomirsky 180) In this subject’s case, her life wasn’t perfect. In fact,“ her mother was
emotionally and physically abusive to her, and her father did nothing to intervene.”
(Lyubomirsky 181). Lyubomirsky explains Angela is happy because she allows herself not to get
caught up in the past and focus on the negative. Instead, she chooses to put her energy into her
loved ones.
a woman who has a very normal life with a decently well-off upbringing. “Growing up, Shannon
had an uneventful childhood, a stable and modest home, and several close
friends,”(Lyubomirsky 181) but here is the thing, “But, despite the lack of tragedy or trauma in
her life, Shannon seems to turn everything into a crisis.” (Lyubomirsky 182) This quote shows
an example of how people with decent lives are more prone to self-destruction since they lack
awareness of real issues and get caught up in absurd situations. It is also important to mention a
lot of people’s assumptions are often false when it comes to being happy and how we maintain it
as a constant.
Lyubomirsky points out these various myths people often believe about being happy
while also numbering them.“Myth No. 1: Happiness Must Be “Found,” explains, “The first myth
Turner 6
is that happiness is something that we must find, that it’s out there somewhere, a place beyond
our reach, a kind of Shangri-La. We could get there, yes, but only if the right things would come
to pass: if we’d marry our true loves, secure out dream jobs.” (Lyubomirsky 185) The idea that
Lyubomirsky wants us to understand that the best method of being happy is: looking at your life,
find what’s affecting you and how you might be able to change the outcome, and become a
stronger person from the negative, since the best way to be yourself is by understanding yourself
and getting to a space in your life where you genuinely feel comfortable.
The concept of space and how it affects our lives is a broad landscape of ideas that
continuously intersect with each other in various ways. The biggest take away is that we must
understand every individual has their own distinct method on how to be happy and what it means
Works Cited
Brooks, David. “What Suffering Does.” Pursuing Happiness, edited by Matthew Parfitt
Hill, Graham. “Living with Less. A Lot Less.” Pursuing Happiness, edited by Matthew
Parfitt and Dawn Skorczewski, Bedford St. Martin’s, 2016, pp. 308-313.
Lyubomirsky, Sonja. “How Happy Are You and Why?” Pursuing Happiness, edited by
Matthew Parfitt and Dawn Skorczewski, Bedford St. Martin’s, 2016, pp. 284-287.