Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
continuous functions.
Complete metric space : A metric space (X,d) is called complete metric space
Let G ⊂ C, G is an open subset of C and H(G) the set of all analytic functioins
H (G ) ⊂ C (G , C )
We denotes the set of analytic function on G by H(G) rather than A(G) because
Thus A(G ) ≠ H (G )
∫ f = lim ∫ f = 0
T T
...(1)
→R = − | f n (w) − f (w) |
fr n k )}()→ ( z) ⊂
ffTnnf(((nkG
a {A
) f (k ) k!
z) −{f gf :( k, )G ≤ C; ∫γ | dw |
D 2π | w − z |k +1
γ G
k! ⎡ f n (w) f (w) ⎤
f n( k ) ( z) − f ( k ) ( z) = ∫ ⎢
2πi γ ⎣ (w − z) k +1
−
(w − z) k +1 ⎥⎦
dw ∀ z∈D
⇒ ...(2)
k! Mn
∴ f n( k ) ( z ) − f ( k ) ( z ) ≤ ∫
2π γ ( R − r )k +1
| dw |
k!M n k!M n
k +1 ∫
= | dw | = .2πR
2π ( R − r ) γ 2π ( R − r ) k +1
k!M n R
= for |z-a|<r ...(3)
2π ( R − r )k +1
⇒ f n( k ) → f (k )
uniformly on B (a ; r ).
∂G
Since f n( k ) → f ( k ) uniformly on each{δ|∃nfzB
(≥=:−
az|(1N a,≠a−|=;20{|
)inf
za
j r)
R|f=(R
a,...., za)}n|:| z − a |= R} > 0
number δ as
Thus from above it follows that f and fn satisfies the condition of Rouche’s
theorem.
f is analytic or f ≡ ∞
a
f(a)
G
C∞
Now
⇒ it is equicontinuous
Now
⇒ ...(2)
.....(3)
5
2 | fn (z) − f (z) |
d ( fn (z) , f (z))=
But
{[1 + | f n ( z ) |2 ][1 + | f ( z ) |2 ]}
1/ 2
∀ z ∈ B (a ; r ) and n ≥ n0
2 | f n ( z) − f ( z) |
≥
{(1 + 4M 2
)(1 + 4 M 2 )} 1/ 2
∀ z ∈ B (a ; r ) and n ≥ n0
Since d { f n ( z ), f ( z )} → 0 uniformly for z ∈ B (a; r ) this gives that
| f n ( z ) − f ( z ) |→ 0 uniformly for z ∈ B (a; r )
From (3)
1
( z) = 0 if g ( z ) = ∞; and
g
1
( z) = ∞ if g ( z ) = 0
g
1
Then it follows that ∈ C (G, C∞ )
g
Also, since f n → f in C (G, C∞ ) then by the property of metric over non zero
1
Now each f is meromorphic on G;
n
6
1 1
So, ∃ r > 0 and an integer n0 such that f and f are analytic on B(a; r) for
n
n ≥ n0
1 1
⇒ →
fn f uniformly on B(a; r).
1 1
From Hurwitz theorem, either ≡ 0 or has isolated zeros in B(a; r).
f f
1
∴ if f ≡/ ∞ then ≡/ 0 and f must be meromorphic in B(a; r)
f
Combining this with the result (4) that f is meromorphic in G if f is not identically
infinite.
1
If each fn is analytic then f has no zeros in B(a; r). Then [ corollary : {fn} ⊂
n
| f ( z) |≤ M , for
Alternately
F is locally bounded if there is an r >0 such that
Montel’s Theorem
....(1)
that
f nk → f
⇒ sup{| f nR ( z ) − f ( z ) |: z ∈ K} → 0 as k → ∞
If | f ( z ) |≤ M for z ∈ K
n k ≤ sup{| f nk ( z ) − f ( z ) |: z ∈ K } + M
when nk → ∞
{ }
ff′∈
F
m
sup
H ≥G1))ffU
{|
((z
sup{| (G z∞
n) ({
nk to M which cannot be true (
right hand side converges
∈KK},≥ fn ∈ F} = ∞
) ||}::zz∈
∞≤M)
Hence the assumption taken at start is wrong. Therefore if is normal it is locally
bounded.
Corollary : is closed in C (G , C ∞ ) .
This can be rectify by taking limit of (1) as z approaches the pole. Now we show
that the limit of (1) when z tends to pole. Let ‘a’ be a pole of f of order ; then
8
For z ≠ a
mAm A1
2 m +1
+ .... + − g ′( z )
2 | f ′( z ) | ( z − a) ( z − a) 2
=
∴ 1+ | f ( z ) | 2 Am A1
2
1+ + .... + + g ( z)
( z − a) m ( z − a)
2 | z − a | m −1 | mAm + ..... + A1 ( z − a ) m −1 − g ′( z )( z − a ) m +1 |
=
| z − a | 2 m + | Am + ..... + A1 ( z − a ) m −1 + g ( z )( z − a ) m | 2
Thus if m ≥ 2
2 | f ′( z ) |
lim =0
z → a 1+ | f ( z ) | 2
⎡ mAm A1 ⎤
f ′( z ) = g ′( z ) − ⎢ m +1
+ .... + ⎥
If m = 1 then ⎣ ( z − a) ( z − a) 2 ⎦
A1
2 − g ′( z )
2 | f ′( z ) | ( z − a) 2
lim = lim
z →a 1+ | f ( z ) | 2 z →a 2
A1
1+ + g ( z)
( z − a)
1
2 A1 − ( z − a) 2 g ′( z )
| z−a| 2
= lim
z →a 1
| z − a |2
[
| z − a | 2 + | A1 + g ( z )( z − a) | 2 ]
2 | A1 | 2
= 2
=
| A1 | | A1 |
2 | f ′( z ) |
which shows that for m ≥ 1 the limit of exits.
1+ | f ( z ) | 2
9
f D
f(G)
G C
(b) f is one-one
(c) f (G ) = {z :| z |< 1}
g (G ) = {z :| z |< 1} g : G → D
z −α
such that f =cϕα , ϕα (z) = 1 − α z is Mobious transformation.
⇒ c =1
⇒ f=g
Hence f is unique.
For the existence of f, consider the family F of all analytic function f having
Also, as n becomes larger { f ( K n )} becomes larger and larger and tries to fill
Thus
Lemma : Let G be a region which is not the whole plane and such that every
(c) f (G ) = D = {z :| z |< 1}
Since f (G ) ⊂ D then
11
proved that
....(1)
f → f ′(a ) of H (G) → C
F.
Since (empty set) therefore f ∈ F .
Define g : G → C by
| h ′(a ) | h( z ) − h(a )
g ( z) = . ....(4)
h ′(a ) 1 − h(a ) h( z )
Then | g (G ) |≤ 1 ⇒ g(G) ⊂ D,
12
Also
f ′(a)(1− | w | 2 ) 1
∴ g ′(a) = .
2 | w| 1− | w |
⎛ (1+ | w |) ⎞ ⎡ 1+ | w | ⎤
= f ′(a)⎜ ⎟ ⎢Q > 1⎥
⎜ 2 | w| ⎟
⎝ ⎠ ⎣⎢ 2 | w | ⎥⎦
> f ′(a )
Theorem : Let f(z) be analytic in a simply connected region R and suppose that
f(z) has no zeros in R. Then there is a analytic function h(z) such that for
all z ∈ R .
Proof : Since in R
f ′( z )
then f ( z ) is also analytic in R and therefore for any two points a and z in R the
13
integral
....(1)
e β = elog|f (a)|+iα
= e log| f ( a )|
e i α = e log r
e iα = r e iα
Then e β = f (a) ...(2)
and if we consider
f ′(ς )
z
h( z ) = β + ∫ dς ....(3)
a
f (ς )
from (3)
Let F ( z) = e h( z )
f ′( z )
then F ′( z ) = e h′( z ) = F ( z ) f ( z )
h( z )
F ′( z ) f ′( z )
⇒ =
F (z) f ( z)
⇒
F ′( z ) f ( z ) − F ( z ) f ′( z )
⇒ =0
[ F ( z )]2
Q be non vanishing
14
d ⎛ f ( z) ⎞
⇒ ⎜ ⎟=0
dz ⎜⎝ F ( z ) ⎟⎠
f ( z)
⇒ = κ (a constant ) for all z ∈ R
F ( z)
Putting z =a, we obtain
∴ f ( z ) = F ( z ) = e h( z )
The analytic function h(z) defined as above is called logarithm of f(z) in R and
we write h( z ) = log f ( z ) .
logarithm of f(z).
log(1 + z ) ⎛ z z2 ⎞
1− = 1 − ⎜⎜1 − + − ... ⎟⎟
z ⎝ 2 3 ⎠
z 1 2 ⎛1 1 ⎞
= − z + .... ≤ ⎜ | z | + | z | 2 +....⎟
2 3 ⎝2 3 ⎠
1
≤ (| z | + | z | 2 +.....)
2
1 |z|
≤ ....(1)
2 1− | z |
1
Further if | z |< then
2
log(1 + z ) 1
1− ≤
z 2
15
z − log(1 + z ) 1
⇒ ≤
z 2
|z|
⇒ | log(1 + z ) | − | z |≤
2
3
⇒ | log(1 + z ) |≤ |z|
2
1
Since log (1+z) is converges to 1, then for | z |< , we have
2
|z| 3
≤| log(1 + z) |≤ | z | ....(2)
2 2
Proposition :
∞ ∞
Re z n > 0 ∀n ≥ 1 . Then ∏ z n converges to a non-zero number iff. ∏ log z n
n =1 n =1
converges.
= exp[log( z1 .z 2 .... z n )] = p n
Now suppose
, then
S n − S n −1 = log z n → 0
Hence ( k n − k n −1 ) → 0 as n → ∞
for
16
So S n → ln( z ) + 2 πiK
Corollary :
∑ ( z n − 1) converges absolutely.
Lemma :
Let X be a set and f1, f2, f3 ... be functions from X into C such that
exp f n ( x)
⇒ − 1 < εe − a
exp f ( x)
Lemma :
function from X into C such that ∑ g n (x) converges absolutely and uniformly for x in
17
X.
∞
Then the product f ( x) = ∏ (1 + g n ( x)) converges absolutely and uniformly for
n =1
n, 1 ≤ n ≤ n 0
3
⇒ and | log(1+ gn (x)) |≤ | gn (x) |; ∀ n ≥ n0 and x ∈ X
2
∞
Thus h( x) = ∑ log(1 + g n ( x)) converges uniformly for x∈ X
n = n0 +1
Now
∴ is also continuous.
Then
⎡ ∞ ⎤
exp h( x) = exp ⎢ ∑ log(1 + g n ( x))⎥
⎣ n = n0 +1 ⎦
∞
= ∏(1+ gn (x)), converges uniformly for x ∈ X and
n=n0 +1
for any x ∈ X .
Now if we take
then
∞
f (x) = ∏(1+ gn (x)),
n=1
18
E( z ; p)
for p = 0, 1, 2, 3,... defined as
E(z ; 0) or E0 (z) = 1 − z
⎛ z2 zp ⎞
E( z ; p) or E p ( z ) = (1 − z ) exp⎜⎜ z + + .... + ⎟, p ≥ 1
⎝ 2 p ⎟⎠
⎛ 2 p
⎞
; p ) or E p ⎛⎜ z ⎞⎟ = ⎛⎜1 − z ⎞⎟ exp⎜ z + 1 ⎛⎜ z ⎞⎟ + ...... 1 ⎛⎜ z ⎞⎟ ⎟, p ≥ 1
z
E(
a ⎝a⎠ ⎝ a⎠ ⎜a 2⎝a⎠ p ⎝ a ⎠ ⎟⎠
⎝
⎛z⎞
⇒ E p ⎜ ⎟ has a simple zero at z =a and no other zero.
⎝a⎠
Also if b is a point in C − G then
Lemma
⎛ z2 zp ⎞ ⎛ z2 zp ⎞
E ′p ( z ) = −1 exp⎜⎜ z + + .... + ⎟ + (1 − z ) exp⎜ z +
⎟ ⎜ + .... + ⎟(1 + z + z 2 + .... + z p −1 )
⎝ 2 p ⎠ ⎝ 2 p ⎟⎠
⎛
= exp⎜⎜ z +
z2
+ .... +
zp ⎞
[
⎟ − 1 + (1 − z )(1 + z + z 2 + .....z p −1 )
p ⎟⎠
]
⎝ 2
On simplifying expressiion in the square bracket only z p remains and all other terms
∞ ⎛ z2 zp ⎞
∴ ∑ k k a z k −1
= − z p
exp ⎜
⎜ z + + ..... + ⎟
p ⎟⎠
k =1 ⎝ 2
⎛ z2 zp ⎞
exp⎜ z + + ..... + ⎟ are all positive
Also the coefficient of the expression of ⎜ p ⎟⎠
⎝ 2
⇒ E p (1) = 0 = 1 + ∑ an
k = p +1
∞ ∞
or ∑ | ak | = − ∑ ak =1
k = p +1 k = p +1
Hence for | z |≤ 1
∞
| E p ( z ) − 1 |= ∑ ak z k
k = p +1
∞
=| z | p +1 ∑ a k z k − p −1
k = p +1
∞
≤ | z | p+1 ∑ | ak |
k= p+1
=| z | p +1
20
Proposition
converges absolutely.
∏ | z n | converges / ∏ z n converges
⇒
Example: Let Z n = −1 ∀ n ∏ zn
then | z n |= 1 ∀ n
⇒ ∏| z n | converges to 1.
n
However ∏ z k is ± 1 depending on whether n is even or odd,
k =1
point of accumulation, the most general entire function having zeros at those points
by
∞ ⎛ z
⎞
F ( z) = e h( z ) m
z ∏ E ⎜⎜ a
; k n ⎟⎟ ...(1)
n =1 ⎝ n ⎠
where h(z) is an arbitrary entire function, m ≥ 0 is the order of multiplicity of a0
=0, and the kn are non negative integers such that the series
k n +1
∞
z
∑
n =1 an
...(2)
with | a n |→ ∞
The sequence { k n } of non-negative integers can always be found such that the
as soon as | a n |≥ 2 | z | which for any given z holds for sufficiently large value of
n , say n>N
Since we are not interested in uniform convergence, only point wise convergence.
then for p =2
log E ( z ; k ) ≤ 2 | z | k +1
provided
22
1
| z |≤
2
We have y
k +1
⎛ z ⎞ z an
log E ⎜⎜ ; k ⎟⎟ ≤ 2
⎝ an ⎠ an
provided Z
x
O R 2R
z 1
≤
an 2
⇒ | a n |≥ 2 | z |
Let R be an arbitrary positive number and consider two circles with centres at
⎛ z | a |> 2 R
⎞
is absolutely and uniformly convergent for all∑
n
z, such ⎜ |z|;<k nR,⎟ and it follows that the
log Ethat ⎜a ⎟
|a n | > 2 R ⎝ n ⎠
product
⎛ z ⎞
∏ E ⎜⎜ ; kn ⎟⎟
|a n |> 2 R ⎝ an ⎠
⎛ z ⎞
∏ E ⎜⎜ ;kn ⎟⎟
|a n |≤ 2 R ⎝ an ⎠
contain a finite number of factors each of which is an analytic function, it follows that
⎛ z ⎞
f1 ( z ) = ∏ E ⎜⎜ ;kn ⎟⎟
|a n |≤ 2 R ⎝ an ⎠
is analytic in |z| < R and vanishes in the disc only at those points of the sequence a1, a2,
∞
A ⊂ C, ∑| f (z) | is uniformly convergent on every compact set K ⊂ A , then
n=1
k
We have
⎛ z ⎞
f2 (z) = ∏ E ⎜⎜ ; k n ⎟⎟
|a n | > 2 R ⎝ an ⎠
is analytic and different from zero in |z| < R.
R was arbitrary chosen positive number, so that f(z) is analytic in the whole finite
∞ ∞
⎛ z⎞
place. ∏
sin π(1z += ef kg (( zz) )z.)∏ ⎜1 − ⎟e z / n ; n≠0
k =1 n = −∞⎝ n⎠
⇒ It is an entire function and has less zero precisely at the points a1 , a 2 ...., a n ...
∴ F ( z) = eh(z) z m f ( z)
is most general entire function with the prescribed zeros.
πz :
Factorization of sinπ
Then by Weierstrass factorization theorem the most general form of this entire
function be
∞
⎡⎛ z⎞ ⎛ z⎞ ⎤
= e g ( z ) z .∏ ⎢ ⎜ 1 − ⎟ e − z / n ⎜ 1 + ⎟ e z / n ⎥
n =1 ⎣ ⎝ n⎠ ⎝ n⎠ ⎦
24
∞
⎛ z2 ⎞
= e g ( z ) z ∏ ⎜⎜ 1 − 2 ⎟⎟ ...(1)
n =1 ⎝ n ⎠
⎡ ⎤
( )
∞
d
π cot πz =
dz ⎢
⎣
g ( z ) + log z + ∏
n =1
log( n 2 − z 2 ) − log n 2 ⎥
⎦
1 ∞ ⎛ 2z ⎞
= h′( z ) + +∏⎜ ⎟ z ≠ ±n ...(2)
z n =1 ⎝ z 2 − n 2 ⎠
But ...(3)
sin πz C1 ∞ ⎛ z 2 ⎞
= ∏⎜⎜1 − 2 ⎟⎟ ; z≠0
πz π n=1 ⎝ n ⎠ ∞
1 ⎛ 2z ⎞
Taking z → 0 π cot πz = + ∏ ⎜ 2 ⎟
n =1 ⎝ z − n ⎠
2
z
C1 n
⎛ k2 ⎞
1= lim lim ∏ ⎜⎜1 − 2 ⎟⎟
π z → 0 n → ∞ k =1 ⎝ n ⎠
∞
⎛ z2 ⎞
Since ∏ ⎜⎜1 − n 2 ⎟⎟ is uniformly converges, therefore the order of limit can be
n =1 ⎝ ⎠
changed
C1 n
⎛ z2 ⎞
= lim lim ∏ ⎜⎜1 − 2 ⎟⎟
π n → ∞ z → 0 k =1 ⎝ k ⎠
C n C
∴ 1 = π nlim
1
∏ (1) = π1
→ ∞ K =1
⇒ C1 = π
∞
⎛ z2 ⎞
⇒ sin π z = π z ∏ ⎜⎜ 1 − 2 ⎟⎟
n =1 ⎝ n ⎠
25
Gamma function
According to Weierstrass (the weierstrass fact. th) the Γ function can be defined
as the reciprocal of a particular entire function with simple zeros at the points 0, -1, -
2,.. namely
∞
⎛ z⎞
F ( z ) = e γ z z ∏ ⎜1 + ⎟e − z / n
n =1 ⎝ n⎠
−1
1 e−γ z ∞ ⎛ z ⎞ z / n
⇒
F(z)
= Γ(z) = ∏⎜1+ ⎟ e
z n=1 ⎝ n ⎠
...(1)
Existence of γ
Now we show that there exists such γ.
Γ∞((1z) )=∞1e⎛−1 log C1−1⎞∞−1 ⎛ 1 ⎞ −1
eΓγ(1=)⎛⎜=∏ z⎞
∏ 1 +⎜11+⎟ n .⎟e∏z /e⎜n1 + n ⎟ e
1/ n 1/ n
n =1 ⎝ n ⎠
n =1 ⎝ ⎠
substituting z =1 in the infinite product n =1 ⎝ ⎠ , we get
∞ −1
⎛ 1⎞
∏ ⎜1 + n ⎟ e 1 / n = C a finite positive number ...(2)
n =1 ⎝ ⎠
1
= .C = 1
C
∴
...(3)
Lemma :
1 1 1
Let H n = 1 + + + ... then γ = nlim
→∞
( H n − log n)
2 3 n
Proof : Taking logarithm on both sides of
∞ −1
⎛ 1⎞
e γ = ∏ ⎜1 + ⎟ e 1 / k
k =1 ⎝ k⎠
We have
∞ ⎡⎛ 1 ⎞ 1/ k ⎤
−1
γ = ∑ log ⎢⎜1 + ⎟ e ⎥
k =1 ⎢⎣⎝ k⎠ ⎥⎦
∞ ⎡⎛ k ⎞ 1 / k ⎤
= ∑ log ⎢⎜ ⎟e ⎥
k =1 ⎣⎝ k + 1 ⎠ ⎦
n
⎡ 1⎤
= lim ∑ ⎢log k − log(k + 1) + ⎥
k =1 ⎣ k⎦
n →∞
⎡ ⎤
⎢ n ⎥
= lim ⎢∑ {log k − log( kΓ (+z )1=)}lim + ∑ ⎥ n!.n
n
1 z
⎡ ⎛ 1 1 ⎞⎤
= lim ⎢− log(n + 1) + ⎜1 + + ... + ⎟⎥
n →∞
⎣ ⎝ 2 n ⎠⎦
⎡ ⎛ 1 1⎞ ⎤
= lim ⎢log n − log(n + 1) + ⎜1 + + ... + ⎟ − log n ⎥
n→∞
⎣ ⎝ 2 n⎠ ⎦
⎡⎛ 1 1⎞ ⎛ ( n + 1) ⎞⎤
= lim ⎢⎜1 + + ... + ⎟ − log n − log⎜ ⎟⎥
n →∞ ⎝ n⎠ ⎝ n ⎠⎦
⎣ 2
⎡⎛ 1 1⎞ ⎤ ⎡ ⎛ (n + 1) ⎞ ⎤
⇒ γ = lim ⎢⎜1 + + ... + ⎟ − log n − 0⎥ ⎢Q nlim log⎜ ⎟ = 0⎥
n→∞ ⎝ n⎠
⎣ 2 ⎦ ⎣ →∞ ⎝ n ⎠ ⎦
⇒ γ = lim ( H n − log n)
n→∞
−1
e −γ z n
⎛ z⎞
= lim ∏ ⎜1 + ⎟ e z / k
z n→∞ k =1 ⎝ k ⎠
e−γ z n
kez / k
= lim∏
z n→∞ k =1 ( z + k )
⎛ z z z⎞
e −γ z (1.2.3....n ). exp ⎜ z + + + .... + ⎟
= lim ⎝ 2 3 n⎠
n→∞ z ( z + 1)( z + 2).....( z + n )
⎧ ⎛ 1 1 1 ⎞⎫
e − z ( H n −log n ) .n!.exp⎨ z⎜1 + + + .... + ⎟⎬
= lim ⎩ ⎝ 2 3 n ⎠⎭
n →∞ z ( z + 1)( z + 2).....(z + n)
n!.e − zH n .e − z log n .e zH n
= lim
n →∞ z ( z + 1)( z + 2).....( z + n)
n!.n z
Γ ( z ) = lim e −γ z ∞ nz!.n−1z +1
n→∞ z )n=) lim ∏ ⎛⎜ 1 + ⎞⎟ e z / n
z ( z + 1)( z + 2).....(Γz( +
...(5)
n →z∞ ( z + 1)( z +n2).....( z + n + 1)
n =1 ⎝ ⎠
n! nz nz
= lim
n→∞ z( z +1)(z + 2).....(z + n) ( z + n +1)
n! n z z
= lim lim
n→∞ z ( z + 1)( z + 2).....(z + n) n→∞ z + 1
( + 1)
n
= Γ(z) . z
28
Reflection formula
⎡ ( n! ) 2 .n ⎤
= lim ⎢ ⎥
n → ∞ z (1 − z )( 2 − z ).....( n − z )( n + 1 − z )
2 2 2 2 2
⎣ ⎦
⎡ ⎤
⎢ ⎥
⎢ 1 ⎥
= lim
n →∞ ⎢ ⎛ z 2
⎞ ⎛ z ⎛ n +1− z ⎞ ⎥
2
⎞
⎢ z (1 − z )⎜⎜1 − 2 ⎟⎟.....⎜⎜1 − 2 ⎟⎟⎜ ⎟⎥
2
⎣ ⎝ 2 ⎠ ⎝ n ⎠⎝ n ⎠⎦
1
=
⎧ ⎛ z2 ⎞ ⎛ z 2 ⎞⎫
z lim ⎨(1 − z 2 )⎜⎜1 − 2 ⎟⎟.....⎜⎜1 − 2 ⎟⎟ ⎬.1
n→∞
⎩ ⎝ 2 ⎠ ⎝ n ⎠⎭
π
z)z=) = lim ⎡; z ≠ 0, ±n1,!.±n2,... ⎤ ⎡
1 z
1 ΓΓ e(1(−1−
((szz)=) ΓΓ s log n
−
n!.n
= ∞ n sin πz ⎢ ⎥. lim ⎢
n →∞ z ( z + 1)( z + 2).....( z + n) n →∞ (1 − z )( 2 − z
⎛ z2 ⎞ ⎣ ⎦ ⎣
z ∏ ⎜⎜1 − 2 ⎟⎟
k =1 ⎝ n ⎠
1
=
sin πz
z.
πz
π
=
sin πz
(ε > 0 arbitrary)
Proof : We have
1 1 1 1 1
= = = ≤
ns | nσ +it | | nσ | | nit | nσ n1+ε
∞ 1
and the series ∑ 1+ ε converges, by Weiestrass M-test
n =1 n
t s −1 ∞
Proof : The integral ∫ t dt converges at both the lower and upper limits
0 e −1
whenever Re s > 1
Since
t
lim =1
t →0 + e −1
t
so that by the definition of limit there is a δ > 0 such that for 0 < t ≤ δ the
inequality
t 1
−1 < ε =
e −1
t
2
t 1
⇒ −1<
e −1 t
2
30
t 3
⇒ < holds.
e −1 2
t
∫
t σ −2
e −1
t
3
t dt ≤ ∫ t σ − 2 dt =
2 δ1
3 1
2 σ −1
δ σ −1 − δ 1σ −1 ( )
δ1
δ
t σ −2 σ −1
⇒ ∫e t dt → 3 δ as δ1 → 0
δ1
t
−1 2 σ −1
tm
lim =0
t → +∞ e t − 1
tm 1
So that there is a b1, such that for t ≥ b1 the ineuqality t < is satisfied
e −1 2
∞
t m sσ − m −−1nu s −11 b σ − m −1
( )
b
1 1
1 1 ∫ e t) −=1nt ∫ e dtu≤ 2du∫ t
Γ ( s dt =
σ −
b σ − m − b1σ − m
→ b1σ −m as b → ∞ b1 0 b1 2 m
2 m−σ
∞
−t s −1
Now in Γ( s) = ∫ e t dt
0
⎛ ⎞
⎜ N
N ∞⎟
1
Γ( s )∑ s = ∫ ∑ e
⎜ − nu ⎟ s −1
u du
and n =1 n ⎜ = ⎟
⎜ 123 ⎟
0 n 1
⎝ ( sum of G . P ) ⎠
∞ ⎛ −u
e (1 − e − Nu ) ⎞ s −1
= ∫ ⎜⎜ ⎟u du
0⎝ (1 − e −u ⎟⎠
∞ ∞
u s −1 u s −1 e − Nu
= ∫
0
eu − 1
du − ∫
0
eu − 1
du
31
Now it is required to prove that
∞
u s −1e − Nu
∫0 eu − 1 du → 0 as N → ∞
∞ s−1 −Nu δ ∞
u e us−1e−Nu us−1e−Nu
∫0 eu −1 du= ∫0 eu −1 du+ ∫δ eu −1 du; δ >0
∞ δ ∞
u s −1e − Nu u σ −1 u σ −1
∫0 e u − 1 ∫0 e u − 1 ∫δ e u − 1 du
− Nδ
⇒ du < du + e
For a given ε >0, we choose δ sufficiently small so as to make the first integral
ε
on right hand side less than .
2
Fixing that δ we can now take N large enough so as to make the second term on
∴ for N → ∞
∞
u s −1
Γ( s ) ς ( s ) = ∫ du valid for Re s >1
0
eu − 1
Note:B(E) denotes a closed algebraU
|rb∃ of−
ab,∈=V0C(K, dK1(D)
|<− <
aC<r that
) contains every rational
a, Kε
function with a pole in E 2
Lemma
If a ∈C − k then ( z − a) −1 ∈ B( E )
Proof : Case I : ∞ ∉ E
V = {a ∈ C : ( z − a)−1 ∈ B( E)}
so E ⊂V ⊂U
⇒ V is open
But
−1
⎡ b−a⎤
= ( Z − 1) −1 ⎢1 − ⎥ ...(3)
⎣ Z − a⎦
From (2)
⎢1 − z − a ⎥ = ∑⎜ ⎟ ...(4)
⎣ ⎦ n =0 ⎝ z − a ⎠
By the Weirestrass M-Test series on right hand side of (4) converges uniformly
on K.
⎛b−a⎞
n k
If Qn ( z ) = ∑ ⎜ ⎟ then
k =0 ⎝ z − a ⎠
( z − a ) −1 Qn ( z ) ∈ B ( E )
Since a ∈ V and B(E) is an algebra (3) shows that B(E) is closed and uniformly
( z − b ) −1 = ⎢ ⎥ ( z − a)
−1
⎣ z−a ⎦
⇒ b ∈V
0 = d ( b , K ) or b∈ K
If H is a component of U = C − K then H I K ≠ φ
So H IV ≠ φ
33
∴ H ⊂V
Case 2 :
Then
n
1
Qn ( z ) = −
a0
∑ (z / a
k =0
0 ) k is a polynomial
and ( z − a0 ) −1 = u − lim Qn on K.
Thus ( z − a0 ) −1 ∈ B ( E )
⇒ B(E0 ) ⊂ B(E )
⇒ ( z − a) −1 ∈ B( E ) for each a ∈ C − K
Definition : Function element is a pair (f,G) where G is a region and f is an
analytic function on G.
Definition : Germ of f at a : [ f ]a .
neighbourhood of a.
Let γ :[0,1] → C be a path and suppose that for each t in [0,1] there is a function
(a) γ (t ) ∈ D
continuation along γ. For 0 ≤ t ≤ 1 let R(t) be the radius of convergence of the power
continuous.
function.
Since
f s ( z ) = f t ( z ) ∀ z ∈ Ds
⇒ R ( s ) = ∞ ∀ s ∈ [0,1]
i.e. R (s ) ≡ ∞
let
⇒ γ ( s ) ∈ Dt I B ( τ; R (t ))
and [ f s ] γ ( s ) = [ f t ] γ ( s )
then the radius of convergence R(s) must be at least as big as the distance from
z((τ−
RsR
|B (ss;)τt)R≥
−|−
<= t δR
(dR ∞
R(σ
)) t)t,))≤{D
(t(U | |z≤γ:|(|tzγ) −
(−t )τγ−|(=sγ)R(|s()t )})
| ≥ R (t ) − | τ − σ |
σ to the circle f t ( z ) = ∑1 τ n ( zs − τ) n
n =0
i.e.
⇒ R (t ) − R ( s ) ≤| γ (t ) − γ ( s ) |
Hence for
⇒ R must be continuous at t.
ε>0 then there is a rational function R(Z) whose only poles lie in E and such that
| f ( z ) − R ( z ) |< ε ∀z∈K
36
Proof : By the fact that if K be a compact subset of the region G, then there are
straight line segments γ 1 , γ 2 ,.....γ n in G – Ksuch that for every function f in H(G).
n
1 f ( w)
f ( z) = ∑ ∫ dw ∀z ∈ K
K =1 2πi γ k w − z
Also If γ be a rectifiable curve and let K be compact set such that K I {γ} = φ .
If f is continuous function on {γ} and ε>0 then there is a rational function R(z) having
Let (f, D) be a function element and let G be a region which contains D: then (f,
D) admits unrestricted analytic continuation in G if for any path γ in G with initial point
{γ}along γ.
in D there is an analytic continuation of (f, D)
f ( w)
∫ w − z dw − R( z ) ; ∀z ∈ K
γ
γ 0 (0) = γ 1 (0) = 0 and γ 0 (0) = γ 1 (0) = b then γ 0 and γ 1 are FEP homotopic if there is
a continuous map
Γ : I 2 → G such that
Γ ( s ,0 ) = γ 0 ( s )
Γ ( s,1) = γ 1 ( s )
Γ(0, t ) = a
Γ(1, t ) = b
for 0 ≤ s, t ≤ 1
I 2 = [0,1] × [0,1]
37
[ f 1 ]b = [ g1 ]b
Γ(0, u) = a; Γ(1, u) = b
along γ u
[ f 1 ]b = [ g1 ]b
...(2)
To show this
Since
then
[h1,u ]b = [ K1 ]b ....(5)
∃a such that
since
⇒
⇒ U is closed
then
1 2π iθ
u (a) = ∫ u (a + re )dθ
2π 0
Proof : Let D be a disk such that
39
B (a; r ) ⊂ D ⊂ G, and
| z − a |= r
z = a + re iθ
dz = ir iθ
1 2 π f (a + re iθ )
=
2π 0
∫ re iθ dθ
1 2π iθ
= ∫ f (a + re )dθ
2π 0
1 2π iθ
f (a) = ∫ f (a + re )dθ
2π 0
2π
1 iθ
Then Re f ( a) = 2π ∫ Re f (a + re )dθ
0 A = {Z ∈ G :u ( z ) = u (a)}
1 2π
⇒ u (a) = ∫ u ( a + re iθ )dθ
2π 0
If | z 0 − b |= ρ and b = z0 + ρe iθ 0 ≤ θ ≤ 2π
Hence by MVP
1 2π
u ( z0 + ρe iφ ) dφ < u ( z0 )
2π ∫0
u ( z0 ) =
which is a contradiction.
by connectedness of G, A = G.
Theorem :
1 + reiθ 1 + z
⇒ iθ
= = (1 + z )(1 − z ) −1
1 − re 1− z
= (1 + z )(1 + z + z 2 + ....)
∞
= 1 + 2∑ z n
n =1
41
∞
= 1 + 2 ∑ r n e inθ
n =1
⎛ 1 + re iθ ⎞ ∞
⇒ Re⎜⎜
−
⎟
iθ ⎟
= 1 + 2 ∑ r n cos nθ
⎝ 1 re ⎠ n =1
∞
(e inθ + e − inθ )
= 1 + 2∑ r n
n =1 2
∞
= ∑ r |n| e inθ
n = −∞
= Pr (θ) ....(1)
Also
(1 − r 2 ) + r (i 2 sin θ)
=
| 1 − re iθ | 2
⎛ 1 + re iθ ⎞ 1− r2
⇒ Re⎜⎜ iθ
⎟=
⎟ 1 − 2r cos θ + r 2 ....(2)
⎝ 1 − re ⎠
[Q| 1 − reiθ |2 = 1 − 2r cos θ + r 2 ]
Prop. 2.3
1 π
(a) ∫ Pr (θ)dθ = 1
2π − π
(b) Pr (θ) > 0 ∀θ, Pr ( −θ) = Pr (θ) and Pr is periodic in θ with period 2π.
(a) u ( z ) = f ( z ) ∀ z ∈ ∂D
(b) u is harmonic in D.
Proof : Define u : D → R as
1 π
u (re iθ ) = ∫ Pr (θ − t ) f (e )dt
it
for 0 ≤ r < 1 ...(1)
2π − π
1 π ⎡1 + rei ( θ−t ) ⎤
u (re iθ ) =
2π −∫π ⎣1 − re i ( θ−t ) ⎦
it
Re ⎢ ⎥ f (e )dt
1442443
by definition of Pr ( θ )
⎧⎪ 1 π it ⎡1 + re
i ( θ −t )
⎤ ⎫⎪
= Re⎨ ∫
⎪⎩ 2π − π
f ( e ) ⎢ i ( θ −t ) ⎥ ⎬
dt
⎣1 − re ⎦ ⎪⎭
⎧⎪ 1 π ⎡ e it + re iθ ⎤ ⎫⎪
= Re⎨ ∫
⎪⎩ 2π − π
f (e it ) ⎢ it iθ ⎥ ⎬
dt ...(3)
⎣ e e∂ε−Dαre0 ∃ a⎪ ρ, 0 < ρ < 1
i>
⎦ ⎭
Let us define g : D → C by
1 π it ⎡ e + z ⎤
it
2π −∫π
g ( z) = f ( e ) ⎢ it ⎥ dt ...(4)
⎣e − z ⎦
Re g = u ...(5)
∴ ∇ 2u = 0 ⇒ u is harmonic.
(ii) Continuity of u on D–
...(8)
δ
for ρ < r < 1 and | θ |≥
2
iθ ⎧ δ⎫
Let A be the arc ⎨e :| θ |< ⎬ then if
⎩ 2⎭
e iθ ∈ A and ρ < r < 1
1 π
u (re iθ ) − f (1) = ∫ Pr (θ − t ) f (e )dt − f (1)
it
2π − π
ε
Pr (θ) <
3M
1 1
= ∫ Pr (θ − t )[ f (e it ) − f (1)]dt + ∫ Pr (θ − t )[ f (e ) − f (1)]dt
it
2π |t |< δ 2π |t |≥ δ
δ δ
if | t |≥ δ and | θ |≤ then | t − θ |≥
2 2
1 1
| u (re iθ ) − f (1) |≤ ∫ 2π |t |∫≥δ
Pr (θ − t ) | f (e it ) − f (1) | dt + Pr (θ − t ) | f (e it ) − f (1) | dt
2π |t |< δ
ε ε
≤ + 2M . [from (7) and (8)]
3 3M
⇒ | u (re iθ ) − f (1) |< ε
| u ( re iθ ) − f (e iα ) |< ε ...(9)
⇒ u-v=0
⇒ u is unique.
Harnack inequality
and all θ
R−r R+r
u (a) ≤ u ( a + re iθ ) ≤ u (a)
R+r R−r
harmonic function.
un → u in C (G, R)
⇒ u is harmonic
(b) Assuming u1 ≥ 0
⇒ Either u (z ) = ∞ or u (z ) ∈ R and u n ( z ) → u ( z ), ∀ z ∈ G
Define
A = {z ∈ G : u ( z ) = ∞} ....(1)
45
B = {z ∈ G : u ( z ) < ∞} ...(2)
Then A U B = G and A I B = φ
...(3)
If a ∈ A then
⇒ B ( a; R ) ⊂ A
⇒ A is open.
⇒ u n (z ) < ∞ ∀ z ∈ B ( a; R )
⇒ B is open
Suppose A = G; that is u ≡ ∞
Mu n ( a ) ≤ u n ( z ) for | z − a |≤ ρ
Now suppose B= G
i.e. u( z) < ∞ ∀ z ∈G
If ρ < R then there is a constant N, which depends only on a and ρ such that
for | z − a |≤ ρ and ∀ n
So if
≤ C[u n ( a ) − u m ( a )]
Since u n ( z ) → u ( z )
⇒ ϕ
0m:(≤aG
B≤
Mu
u is the required harmonic function. nu;(nr→
n a())z⊂)≤R
−
Gu u,n (mz()z≤) ≤NNu
u n n( a( a) ) − Mu m ( a )
Definition :
such that
2π
1
ϕ (a) ≤ ∫
2π 0
ϕ (a + reiθ )dθ
Definition:
such that
2π
1
ϕ (a) ≥ ∫
2π 0
ϕ (a + reiθ )dθ
47
Definition :
that
Dirichlet Problem : It consists in determining all regions G such that for any
(c) for
If we define ψ̂ r by letting
ψ̂ r = ψ r on G(a; r)
ψˆ r ( z ) = 1 for
then is superharmonic.
zero.
Theorem : Let G be a region and let a ∈ ∂ ∞ G such that there is a barrier for G
at a.
| w − a |< 2δ ;
Let ψ = ψδ
Let ψˆ : G → R defined by
Then is superharmonic.
then
− Mψˆ − ε is subharmonic.
Because
If particular if w ∈ ∂ ∞ G I B ( a; δ ) then
lim sup[− Mψˆ ( z ) − ε ] ≤ −ε < f ( w) by the choice of δ.
z →w
Hence
...(6)
Similarly
liminf[Mψˆ ( z) + ε ] ≥ limsup(ϕ( z)) and w in .
z →w z →w
we have
∀ϕ in and z ∈ G
Hence
....(7)
Harmonic function
Harmonic conjugate
z2 zk 1 k +!
Log (1 − z ) = − z − − − z ....
2 k k +1
for | z |< 1
1 k +1 1 1
∴ log E ( z; k ) = − z − z k + 2 − ..... for | z |≤ p < 1
k +1 k+2
50
⎛ 1 1 ⎞
∴ | Log E ( z; k ) |≤| log E ( z; k ) |≤ | z |k +1 ⎜ + | z | +...⎟
⎝ k +1 k + 2 ⎠
≤| z | k +1 (1+ | z | + | z | 2 +.....) [Q k > 0]
⎛ 1 1 ⎞
≤ | z | k +1 ⎜⎜1 + + 2 + ... ⎟⎟
⎝ p p ⎠
p
= | z | k +1
p −1
for k =0
⎛ |z| ⎞
| log E ( z;0) |=| log(1 − z ) |≤| z | ⎜1 + + ...⎟
⎝ 2 ⎠
⎛ 1 1 ⎞
≤ | z | ⎜⎜ 1 + + 2 + ... ⎟⎟
⎝ p p ⎠
p
| log E ( z;0) |= |z|
p −1
for p =2
2
| Log E ( z; k ) |≤ | z |k +1 = 2 | z |k +1
2 −1
1
provided | z |≤
2
Example : construct an entire function with simple zeros at the point
0, 1, 2 p , 3 p , ... , n p , ... ( p > 1)
Solution : We may take kn = 0 for every n. The series
∞ ∞
z 1
∑ n p
=| z | ∑ p
n =1 n =1 n
1
m=1 (simple zero at z=0), kn = 0, an =
np
∞
⎛ z ⎞
⇒ F ( z ) = e h ( z ) z ∏ ⎜1 − p ⎟
n =1 ⎝ n ⎠
....(1)
k n +1
∞
z
provided ∑
n =1 an
converges for ∀z where a n , n ≥ 1 are zeros.
k n +1
∞∞
⎛ ⎛z z ⎞ ⎞
∞
r F ( zπ)z==e he( z ) z mz∏
sin h( z) 1
∏ E⎜⎜E ⎜⎜ ; k;n k⎟⎟ n ⎟⎟
since ∑
n = −∞ an
< ∞; n ≠ 0, ∀ r > 0 n =n1 =1 ⎝ a ⎝n a n ⎠ ⎠
∞
1
= 2 | z |2 ∑ n2 that conveyes for each z
n =1
⎡⎛ z ⎞⎛ z ⎞ ⎛ z ⎞ ⎛ z ⎞⎤
∞
sinπz = e h( z )
z∏ ⎢⎜1+ ⎟⎜1 − ⎟ exp⎜ ⎟ exp⎜ − ⎟⎥
n=1 ⎣⎝ n ⎠⎝ n ⎠ ⎝ n ⎠ ⎝ n ⎠⎦
52
∞
⎛ z2 ⎞
sin πz = e h( z )
z∏ ⎜⎜1 − 2 ⎟⎟
n =1 ⎝ n ⎠
Example : Construct an entire function with simple zero at the point 0, -1, -2,
...., -n.
k n +1
∞ ∞ ∞
z 1 1
i.e. ∑
n =1 an
=| z | ∑
2
n =1 | −n |
2
=| z |2 ∑n
n =1
2
∞ z
⎛ z⎞ −
= e h ( z ) z ∏ ⎜1 + ⎟e n
n =1 ⎝ n⎠
∞ ⎛ z ⎞
is said to be rank of the infinite product. ∏ E ⎜⎜ a ; k n ⎟⎟
n =1 ⎝ n ⎠
infinite product
∞ ⎛ z ⎞
∏ E⎜⎜ a ; k ⎟⎟ is called canonical product.
n =1 ⎝ n ⎠
If F ( z) = eh( z ) .z m P( z) ...(1)
where P(z) is canonical product of rank k and A a non-empty set of non negative
converges.
Then the number ρ = glb A is called the exponent of convegence of the zeros of
is given by
1 log rn
= lim
ρc n→∞ log n
1
Example : If (i) | a |= n 2 log (ii) | an |=| a |n , | a |> 1 then find ρc.
n n
called the genus of the entire function and q is said to be the exponential degree of F.
If P(z) is not of finite rank k, or if h(z) is not a polynomial, then F is said be of infinite
genus.
h( z ) = z 2 is a polynomial of degree 2.
P( z ) = 1
∴ kn = k = 0
for all sufficiently large value of r = |z|, then F(z) is caled an entire function of
finite order.
Alternatively
K >0
A
or | F ( z ) |< K e r ;
If F(z) is an entire function of finite order ρ and there exists a constant B >0 such
that
r large enough
maximum type).
if either the function is of order ρ =1 and type , or the function is of order less
then 1.
log log M (r )
∴ ρ−ε< <ρ+ε
log r
log log M (r )
⇒ ρ = lim
r →∞ log r
logM (r)
σ = lim
r →∞ rp
Proof : Since the entire function f(z) of finite order ρ is of type σ
Therefore
ρ
M ( r ) < e σr ...(1)
1 2π n
R
∫
2π 0
log | f (Re iθ
) | d θ = log | f ( 0 ) | + ∑ log
| ak |
k =1
is dfined at the point a1 , a 2 ,..., a n then it becomes analytic in | z |< R ′ and does
not vanish analytic in this disc. Then there exists a function h(z) analytic in R'such that
2π
1
∫ h(Re
iθ
= )dθ = 0 ...(3)
2π 0
But Re h( z ) = log | g ( z ) |
1 2π a1 .a 2 ......a n f (Re iθ )
∫ (a − Re iθ )...(a − Re iθ ) f (0) dθ = 0
log
2π 2 π 2π 0
1 1 1
1 n 2π n
⇒ 2π ∫0
log | f (Re iθ
) | dθ −
2π ∫0
log | f ( 0 ) | d θ + ∑ log | a k | dθ
2π k =1 ∫0
1 n 2π
− ∑ log | a k − Re iθ | dθ = 0
2π k =1 ∫0
1 2π 1 n
⇒
2π ∫0
log | f (Re iθ
) | d θ − log | f ( 0 ) | + ∑ log | a k | ×2π
2π k =1
1 n 2π 1
+ ∑ ∫
2π k =1 0
log
| a k − Re iθ |
dθ = 0
1 2π 1 n
⇒ 2π ∫0
log | f (Re iθ
) | d θ − log | f ( 0 ) | + ∑ log | a k | ×2π
2π k =1
58
⎛ ⎞
⎜ ⎟
n 2π
1 ⎜ 1 ⎟
+ ∑ ∫ log⎜ ⎟dθ = 0
2π k =1 0 a e−iθ
⎜ | Re | k
iθ
−1 ⎟⎟
⎜ R
⎝ ⎠
1 2π 1 n
⇒
2π ∫0
log | f (Re iθ
) | d θ − log | f ( 0 ) | + ∑ log | a k | ×2π
2π k =1
1 n ⎡ ⎤
2π
ak e−iθ
+ ∑ ⎢
2π k =1 ∫0 ⎣
− log | R | − log1 −
R
⎥dθ = 0
⎦
1 2π 1 n
⇒
2π ∫0
log | f (Re iθ
) | d θ − log | f ( 0 ) | + ∑ log | a k | ×2π
2π k =1
2π
1 n 1 n ak e−iθ
+ ∑ 2π (− log R) − ∑ ∫ log1 − dθ = 0
2π k =1 2π k =1 0 R
1 2π 1 n
⇒ ∫
2π 0
log | f (Re iθ ) | dθ − log | f (0) | + ∑ log | a k | ×2π
2π k =1
n 2π
1 a k e − iθ
+ (− n) log R −
2π
∑ ∫
k =1 0
log 1 −
R
dθ = 0
14 4244 3
( = 0 when |a k / R|≤1)
2π n n
1
∫ log | f (Re ) | dθ = log | f (0) | −∑ log | ak | + ∑ log R
iθ
⇒ 2π 0 k =1 k =1
n ⎛ R ⎞
= log | f (0) | + ∑ log⎜⎜ ⎟
k =1 ⎝ | ak | ⎟⎠
Corollary : If n(r) denotes the number of zeros of the entire function F(z) in the
Proof : Let a1 , a 2 ,...., a n are zeros of F(z) in |z| <R such that | a1 |<| a 2 |< .... <| a n |
Then
n ⎛ R ⎞ n
∑ log⎜⎜ | a ⎟⎟ = n log R − ∑ log | a k |
k =1 ⎝ k |⎠ k =1
59
n −1
= n log R + ∑ k[log | a k +1 | − log | a k |] − n log | a n |
k =1
n −1 |a k +1 |
1
=∑ ∫ k dt + n(log R − log | a n |)
k =1 |a k | t
n −1 |a k +1 | R
k 1
=∑ ∫ dt + n ∫ dt ....(1)
k =1 |a k | t | an | t
n(t ) = 0 for 0 ≤ t ≤| a1 |
We have (from 1)
( n − 1)
n |a | |a | |a | |a |
R
R 2
1 3
2 4
3 n
1
∑ log = ∫ dt + ∫ dt + ∫ dt + ... + ∫
| a k | |a1 | t
dt + n ∫ dt
k =1 |a 2 | t |a 3 | t |a n −1 | t | an | t
R
n(t )
=∫ dt
0 t
1 2 r n (t )
log 2 ∫0 t
⇒ n(r ) ≤ dt ....(1)
⇒ n(r) = o(r ρ +ε ) as r → ∞
Now we show that
from (5)
1 1 1
<
rnρ + ε n log 2
( ρ +δ ) /( ρ + ε )
1 1 ⎛ 1 ⎞
and <A A = ⎜⎜ ⎟⎟
rnρ +ε n( ρ +δ ) /( ρ +ε ) ⎝ log 2 ⎠
(ρ + δ ) ∞
1
(ρ + ε )
> 1 , the series ∑n ρ δ
n=1
( + ) /( ρ +ε ) converges
∞
Hence ∑ rn−(ρ+ε)
n =1
1
P(z), a dix of radius r p is described where rn = | a n | and = order P(z). Then in
n
the region R complementary to the union of all those discs, the inequality
−p −p
the intervals U [ rn − rn , rn + rn ] on the real axis each of length 2rn− p does not cover
n
There are infinitely many circles with center at the origin and radii arbitrarily large
which lie in R.
⎛ z ⎞ ⎛ z ⎞
| P ( z ) |= ∏ E ⎜⎜ a ; k ⎟⎟ ∏ E ⎜⎜ a ; k ⎟⎟ ....(1)
rn ≤ 2 r ⎝ n ⎠ rn > 2 r ⎝p >n ρ ⎠ ρ +ε
| P( z ) |> e − r (ε > 0)
⎛ z ⎞ ⎛ z ⎞
⇒ log | P ( z ) | = ∑ log E ⎜⎜ a ; k ⎟⎟ + ∑ log E ⎜⎜ a ; k ⎟⎟
rn ≤ 2 r ⎝ n ⎠ rn > 2 r ⎝ n ⎠
k
z z ⎛ z ⎞ 1 ⎛ z ⎞
≥ ∑ log 1 − −∑ + .... + ⎜⎜ ⎟⎟ . − ∑ log E ⎜⎜ ; k ⎟⎟ ....(2)
rn ≤ 2 r an rn ≤ 2 r an ⎝ an ⎠ k rn > 2 r ⎝ an ⎠
⎛ z ⎞ ⎧⎪ 1 ⎛ a ⎞ ⎫⎪
2 k k −1 k −1
k
z 1⎛ z ⎞ 1⎛ z ⎞ 1 ⎛ an ⎞
+ ⎜⎜ ⎟⎟ + ..... + ⎜⎜ ⎟⎟ ≤ ⎜⎜ ⎟⎟ ⎨ + ⎜ ⎟ + .... + ⎜ n ⎟ ⎬
an 2 ⎝ an ⎠ k ⎝ an ⎠ ⎝ an ⎠ ⎪⎩ k k − 1 ⎝ z ⎠ ⎝ z ⎠ ⎪⎭
⎧⎪ 1 k −1
⎫⎪
k
⎛ r ⎞ an
≤ ⎜⎜ ⎟⎟ ⎨ + .... + ⎬
⎝ rn ⎠ ⎪⎩ k z ⎪
1 4 42 4 4 3⎭
( A1 which does not depend on r )
k
⎛r ⎞
= A1 ⎜⎜ ⎟⎟ ....(3)
⎝ rn ⎠
62
k k
z 1⎛ z ⎞ ⎛ r ⎞
∴ ∑ + ....... + ⎜⎜ ⎟⎟ ≤ A1 ∑ ⎜⎜
k ⎝ an ⎠
⎟⎟
rn ≤ 2 r an rn ≤ 2 r ⎝ rn ⎠
2 ρ + ε / 2− k .r ρ + ε / 2+ k
= A1 ∑ ρ+ ε / 2−k .r ρ+ε / 2 (r ) k
rn ≤ 2 r 2 n
2 ρ + ε / 2− k .r ρ+ ε / 2
= A1 ∑ ρ+ε / 2−k
.(rn ) k
rn ≤ 2 r ( 2r )
1
= A1 2 ρ + ε / 2 − k .r ρ + ε / 2 ∑ (rn ) ρ+ε / 2−k
.(rn ) k
rn ≤ 2 r
⎛ 1 ⎞
= r ρ + ε / 2 ⎜⎜ A1 2 ρ + ε / 2 − k ∑ ρ + ε / 2 ⎟⎟
⎝144 42n4 4 43⎠
=1 rn
= A2 r ρ + ε / 2 ....(4)
If k =0 the sum in (4) does not appear in (2). For z outside every circle | z − an |= rn− p
with rn ≤ 2r .
We have
z | a − z | rn− p
1− = n = = rn− p −1 ≥ (2r ) − p −1
an | an | rn
Hence for all circles |z| =r in the region R, with r sufficiently large,
ρ+ε
log | P ( z ) |> − r ρ + ε ⇒ | P ( z ) |> e − r
63
...(1)
When h(z) is an entire function and P(z) a product which may or may not be
canonical.
replacing ε by we have
|≤
FεPρ
((zz))=|>eeh(−zr) z m P( z)
ρ+ ε / 2
Re h( z ) < r ρ + ε
sinπ z ∞ π 2n z n
Solution : Let F ( z) = = ∑ (−1)n ....(1)
π z n =0 (2n + 1)!
64
π2 z
=1− + .....
3!
∞
when F ( z ) = ∑ c n z then by the formula
n
n =0
1 log(1 / | c n |)
= lim ...(2)
ρ n→∞ n log n
1 1
= 2 i.e. ρ = ...(3)
ρ 2
Since zeros of F(z) are z =1, 4, ..., n2, ... we have
sin π z ∞
⎛ z ⎞
F ( z) = = e h ( z ) ∏ ⎜1 − 2 ⎟ ...(4)
π z n =1 ⎝ n ⎠
⇒ h( z ) = C (constant)
∞ 1
⎛ z⎞ h( z ) ≤
∴ F (z) = e ∏⎜1− 2 ⎟
C
2
n=1 ⎝ n ⎠
Since F (0) = 1
⇒ C =0
sin π z ∞
⎛ z ⎞
∴ = F ( z ) = ∏ ⎜1 − 2 ⎟
π z n =1 ⎝ n ⎠
Replacing z by z2
sin πz ∞ ⎛ z2 ⎞
= ∏ ⎜⎜1 − 2 ⎟⎟
πz n =1 ⎝ n ⎠
65