Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Team: 1
1
ABSTRACT
To begin with, this experiment was conducted in order to achieve the objective which are to
study the effect of different pressures across reverse osmosis (RO) membrane on solute
fluxes and separation. The experiment was conducted for 30 minutes with the initial of feed
solution of sodium chloride with 2 gram per liter concentration. The membrane used was
polyamide film reverse osmosis. The pressure range for this experiment is 5, 10, and 15 barg.
The conductivity for the experiment is measured for every 3 minutes interval up to 30 minutes
by using conductivity meter. The conductivity for both permeate and retentate are taken. For
the results, for pressure 5 barg, it shown the best results as the conductivity of permeate is
decreasing at some point and last 6 minutes also decreasing but for the retentate is
decreasing. The hypothesis when the time is increasing, the conductivity of should be
decreasing and the retentate should be increasing. The value of conductivity of permeate for
pressure 5 barg at 3 minutes is 520.3 𝜇𝑆 and decreasing to 102.0 𝜇𝑆 after 30 minutes. While
for retentate, the conductivity of permeate for pressure 5 barg at 3 minutes is 3.87 mS and
decreasing to 1.623 mS after 30 minutes. From the calculation, the value for flux of NaCl is at
the 30 minutes for 5, 10, and 15 barg were 1.5588 x 10-4, 1.5553 x 10-4, and 1.5587 x 10-4
𝑚2 .𝑠
respectively. The membrane resistance value is −99800.4 𝑔 𝑚𝑜𝑙
. It can concluded that the
conductivity of permeate should be decreasing and the retentate should be increasing with
respect to time. For recommendations to improve the results, the conductivity meter should
be placed in water during time interval for the best accuracy of results
2
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Membrane filtration (MF) can be a very efficient and economical way of separating
components that are suspended or dissolved in a liquid [1]. A membrane is a thin layer of
semi-permeable material that separates substances when a driving force is applied across
the membrane [2]. Membrane process are increasingly used for removal of bacteria,
microorganisms, particulates, and natural organic material, which can impart colour,
tastes, and odours to water and react with disinfectants to form disinfection byproducts [2].
Types of membrane filtration based on membrane pore sizes are described below;
Ultrafiltration
Ultrafiltration (UF) is the process of separating extremely small particles and dissolved
molecules from fluids. The primary basis for separation is molecular size, although in all
filtration applications, the permeability of a filter medium can be affected by the chemical,
molecules which differ by at least an order of magnitude in size. Molecules of similar size
molecular weight (MW) are retained by certain ultrafiltration membranes, while salts and
water will pass through. Colloidal and particulate matter can also be retained.
Ultrafiltration membranes can be used both to purify material passing through the filter
and also to collect material retained by the filter. Materials significantly smaller than the
pore size rating pass through the filter and can be depyrogenated, clarified and separated
from high molecular weight contaminants. Materials larger than the pore size rating are
retained by the filter and can be concentrated or separated from low molecular weight
for buffer exchange, desalting, or concentration. Ultrafilters are also ideal for removal or
exchange of sugars, non-aqueous solvents, the separation of free from protein bound
3
ligands, the removal of materials of low molecular weight, or the rapid change of ionic
and/or pH environment (see Figure 1). Depending on the protein to be retained, the most
frequently used membranes have a nominal molecular weight limit (NMWL) of 3 kDa to
100 kDa. Ultrafiltration is far gentler to solutes than processes such as 1 precipitation. UF
is more efficient because it can simultaneously concentrate and desalt solutes. It does
not require a phase change, which often denatures labile species, and UF can be
Nanofiltration
Nanofiltration membranes have a nominal pore size of approximately 0.001 microns and
a molecular weight cut-off (MWCO) of 1,000 to 100,000 daltons. Pushing water through
these smaller membrane pores requires a higher operation pressure than either MF or
UF. Operating pressures are usually near 600 kPa (90psi) and can be as high as 1,000
kPa (150psi). These systems can remove virtually all cysts, bacteria, viruses, and humic
materials. They provide excellent protection from DBP formation if the disinfectant
residual is added after the membrane filtration step. Because NF membranes also remove
alkalinity, the product water can be corrosive, and measures, such as blending raw water
and product water or adding alkalinity, may be needed to reduce corrosivity. NF also
removes hardness from water, which accounts for NF membranes sometimes being
called “softening membranes.” Hard water treated by NF will need pretreatment to avoid
precipitation of hardness ions on the membrane. However, more energy is required for
NF than MF or UF [2].
4
Reverse Osmosis
Reverse osmosis (RO) separates salts and small molecules from low molecular weight
solutes (typically less than 100 daltons) at relatively high pressures using membranes
with NMWLs of 1 kDa or lower. RO membranes are normally rated by their retention of
molecular weight of retained solutes. Millipore water purification systems employ both
systems are primarily used to purify tap water to purities that exceed distilled water 2
quality. Ultrafiltration systems ensure that ultrapure water is free from endotoxins as well
5
1.2 Configuration of Operating a Filtration Process
filtration a constant turbulent flow along the membrane surface prevents the accumulation
of matter on the membrane surface. The membranes used in this process are commonly
tubes with a membrane layer on the inside wall of the tube. The feed flow through the
membrane tube has an elevated pressure as driving force for the filtration process and a
high flow speed to create turbulent conditions. The process is referred to as "cross-flow",
because the feed flow and filtration flow direction have a 90 degrees angle. Cross-flow
filtration is an excellent way to filter liquids with a high concentration of filterable matter
[1].
membrane surface.
ii. The concentrate (retentate) remains in a mobile form suitable for further
processing.
iii. The solute content of the concentrate may be varied over a wide range.
6
A typical crossflow operation includes recirculation loop which is as shown in Figure 3.
7
2.0 OBJECTIVES
ii. To determine the effect of differential pressure across reverse osmosis membrane
3.0 THEORY
Numerous theoretical models for ultrafiltration, nanofiltration, and reverse osmosis have
been proposed along with the identification of new factors controlling flux or mass transfer
through membranes [3]. The basic operating patterns are best outlined in terms of the
membrane surface.
1 𝑑𝑉 ∆𝑃 ∆𝑃
𝐽= = = (1)
𝐴𝑚 𝑑𝑡 μ(𝑅𝑚 + 𝑅𝑐 ) 𝜇[𝑅 + (𝛼𝑉𝐶𝑏 )]
𝑚 𝐴𝑚
For most biological materials, α is a variable depending on the applied pressure and time
A useful method for the effects of cross-flow removal of depositing materials is to write:
∆𝑃
𝐽= (2)
μ(𝑅𝑚 + 𝑅𝑐 − 𝑅𝑟 )
convective particle transport at steady state (JssCb), which can be obtained experimentally
seldom achieved. In such cases, it is possible to describe the time dependence of filtration
deposit rather than being swept along by the bulk flow. This gives:
(3)
8
𝛽𝛼𝑉𝐶𝑏
𝑅𝑐 = , 𝑤ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒 0 < 𝛽 < 1
𝐴𝑚
Figure 5: Typical dependence of membrane flux. (a) Applied pressure difference, (b)
9
Solution containing macromolecular gel-forming solute will form a gel on the surface of the
membrane. The gel formation will contribute to formation of dynamic membranes. The
mechanism is as follows:
Due to convective flux through the membrane a concentration of the solution at the surface
Cw increases and eventually reaches a gel formation concentration Cg (Figure 3b). The
𝐶𝑤
𝐽 = 𝑘. 𝑙𝑛 (4)
𝐶𝑏
𝐶𝑤 ∆𝑃
𝑙𝑛 = (5)
𝐶𝑏 𝜇(𝑅𝑚 + 𝑅𝑝 )𝑘
As long as concentration Cw is less than Cg, Cw, will increase with pressure, but the moment
Cw, equals Cg, an increase in ∆P brings about an increase of the layer resistance Rp, and
Assuming no fouling effect, the membrane resistance, Rm can be calculated from the flux
equation below:
∆𝑃
𝐽= (6)
𝜇. 𝑅𝑚
1
The slope obtained from the plot of flux, J versus ∆P is equal to 𝜇.𝑅 where µ is the dynamic
𝑚
10
The retention of any solute can be expressed by the rejection coefficient, R.
𝐶𝑓
ln (𝐶 )
0 (7)
𝑅=
𝑉
𝑙𝑛 (𝑉0 )
𝑓
Where,
V0 = initial volume
polarization including UF rate and mixing. For material entirely rejected, the rejection
Rejection is a function of molecular size and shape. Nominal cut off levels, defined with
molecular size then by more open membranes. For maximum retention of a solute, select
Many biological macromolecules tend to aggregate so that effective size may be much
larger that the “native” molecule, causing increased rejection. Degree of hydration, counter
ions and steric effects can cause molecules with similar molecular weights to exhibit very
11
4.0 APPARATUS
5
1
1. Control System
2. Feed Tank, T1
3. Pump
5. Membrane
12
5.0 PROCEDURE
A. START-UP PROCEDURE
2. Valve V4 is closed and the solution is filled into the feed tank, T1.
3. The water inside the heating or cooling tank is ensured to be above the heating
element.
6. The pressure regulator PR1 is opened using a wrench until the desired
8. The liquid level inside the heating or cooling tank is made sure to always be
B. EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE
Closed valve: V1, V2, V4, V6, V8, V9, V10, V12
2. Valve V7 is adjusted to achieve the desired inlet pressure starting with the lowest
pressure at 5 barg.
13
C. SHUT DOWN PROCEDURE
1. The leftover liquid must be completely drained after the experiment is finished.
2. The liquid must be drainage points (V1, V4, V6, V8, V9 and V10).
6.0 RESULTS
Pressure (barg)
Flowrate,Q
(LPM) 5 barg 10 barg 15 barg
Conductivity
3 520.3 3.87 202.8 1.67 131.5 4.04
14
Initial Concentration of NaCl of water = 0.357 M
Pressure (barg)
Concentration
(M)
3 5.698x10-3 0.0424 2.221x10-3 0.0182 1.440x10-3 0.0442
15
Table 3: Flux at interval 3 min at different pressure
Pressure (barg)
5 10 15
Time (min)
3 1.5387 × 10−4 1.5539 × 10−4 1.5574 × 10−4
1.56
Flux (x10-4 mol/m2s)
1.55
1.545
1.54
1.535
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Time (min)
16
For pressure = 10 barg
1.557
Flux (x10-4 mol/m2s)
y = -3E-05x + 1.556
1.556
1.555
1.554
1.553
1.552
1.551
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Time (min)
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Time (min)
17
Flux versus pressure
1.559
1.5585
Flux (x10-4 mol/m2s)
1.558
y = -1E-05x + 1.5577
1.5575
1.557
1.5565
1.556
1.5555
1.555
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
Pressure (barg)
𝑚2 .𝑠
Membrane Resitance = −99800.4
𝑔 𝑚𝑜𝑙
0.102 𝑚𝑆 × 0.64
=
58.44 𝑔/𝑚𝑜𝑙
= 1.117 × 10−3
18
2. Calculating the flux of NaCl:
𝐽 = 𝐴𝑠 (𝑐1 − 𝑐2 )
𝑐1 = 𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛
𝑐2 = 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑚𝑒𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛
𝐿
𝐽 = (4.38 × 10−7 𝑚/𝑠)(0.357 𝑀 − 1.117 × 10−3 𝑀) (1000 )
𝑚3
1
𝑅𝑚 =
𝜇. 𝑚
1 𝑚2 . 𝑠
𝑅𝑚 = = −99800.4
1.002 × 10−3 × 103 × (−1 × 10−5 ) 𝑔 𝑚𝑜𝑙
19
8.0 DISCUSSION
The experiment was carried out to determine the effect of differential pressure
across reverse osmosis membrane on solute fluxes and separation. Reverses osmosis is
a process by which a pressure in excess of the osmotic pressure of the saline water feed
membrane [4]. Pure water is thereby caused to diffuse through the membrane, while the
salt molecules or other impurities are retained by the membrane. The experiment was
conducted for 30 minutes with the initial feed solution of sodium chloride with 2 gram per
litre concentration. The membrane used was polyamide film reverse osmosis. Reverses
osmosis membrane comprise two layers a porous polysulfone support layer and a semi-
permeable layer of amine and carboxylic acid chloride functional groups [5]. The
polyamide active layer is the thinnest of all layers and sits upon the porous polysulfone
layer. There is concern that the active layer might tear that the membrane has been
resulting in too short of useful life, and too low flux or salt rejection, resulting in inefficient
operation [4].
For 30 minutes at 3 minutes interval, the conductivity reading was taken for
permeate and retentate sample. As the time passes by, the expected conductivity of
permeate should be decreasing and the retentate should be increasing. For pressure at
5 barg, the conductivity of permeate seems to be uneven, while the reading conductivity
because the reading of conductivity are not stable yet or the conductivity probe are not
swirl completely in sample. For pressure 10 barg, the conductivity reading of permeate
seems to be following the hypothesis at first, but then it inclined for the last 6 minutes,
while the retentate followed the hypothesis but with slight increase in the reading. For
pressure at 15 barg, the permeate conductivity reading becomes unstable but shows a
20
decrease reading pattern at some moment. The retentate reading did increase but in small
amount.
By calculating all the flux at each interval time at different pressure, three graphs
are plotted to look at the pattern of flux at different pressure. The pattern for 5 barg shows
an overall increase in slope, while for barg 10 is the opposite. For 15 barg, the pattern
show just slightly decrease in slope. The flux at the 30 minutes for 5, 10, and 15 barg
were 1.5588 x 10-4, 1.5553 x 10-4 and 1.5587 x 10-4 respectively. The optimum flux was
Apart from that the membrane resistance can be calculated from plotting the flux
at 30 minutes against pressure. The membrane resistance was calculated from the
gradient of linear equation of the graph. The value of membrane resistance of polyamide
𝑚2 .𝑠
film used was −99800.4 𝑔 𝑚𝑜𝑙
.
The value was quite large in negative because of the small value of negative
gradient from the graph plotted. This could show that the membrane has already surpass
its lifespan on working lifetime. Some mistakes also must be occurred that lead to the
9.0 CONCLUSION
After completing the experiment, the result yield that at low pressure (5 barg), the
flux of NaCl is at optimum value. The flux value for 10 barg and 15 barg is lower than 5
barg. For pressure at 5 barg, the conductivity of permeate seems to be uneven, while the
expected to be. For pressure 10 barg, the conductivity reading of permeate seems to be
following the hypothesis at first, but then it inclined for the last 6 minutes, while the
retentate followed the hypothesis but with slight increase in the reading. For pressure at
21
15 barg, the permeate conductivity reading becomes unstable but shows a decrease
reading pattern at some moment. The retentate reading did increase but in small amount.
The value of membrane resistance is negatively large because of the small negative value
of gradient from the graph plotted. This experiment finalized that pressure at 5 barg was
better for operation of reverse osmosis membrane instead of 10 and 15 barg of working
pressure.
10.0 RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Keep monitoring and adjusting valve V7 as the pressure keep fluctuating from the
2. Always put the conductivity meter probe in clean deionized water every time after usage
to avoid the error of the actual reading, since the probe is very sensitive.
3. The desire pressure should not exceed the maximum pressure of the RO membrane
4. The membrane should be in good condition to ensure the experiment runs without any
problem.
22
11.0 REFERENCE
[1] Ahsan Munir. (2006). Dead End Membrane Filtration. Page 1-4.
[3] Zubir, N. A., Chang, S. H., Jalil, M. J., Osman, M. S., and Abd Jalil, S. N. (2017). Unit
[4] John E. Cadotte. (1977). United States Patent. REVERSE OSMOSIS MEMBRANE.
Page 2
23
12.0 APPENDIX
24