Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
There are significant barries to leaning that exists in that kind of envrionment, which
prevents organisations from learning from their crisis. These barriers are discussed here.
Toft & Reynolds (2016) holds that many organisations are not able to learn from crisis
because of the rigid core beliefs they follow and the ineffective communication. Accordingly,
rigid organizatioanl beliefs results in misundersandings owing to the wrong assumoptions and
commited by Harold Shipman, in which the investigation by the coroner were hindered by
disbelief at the idea of a doctor killing patients. Reason (1997) explains that supposing it is
assumed that doctors act in a professional way, then the availabel controls will reflect this
assumption.
Drennan, McConnell & Stark (2014) noted that another barrier to learning from crisis
arises from different causes. According to Drennan, McConnell & Stark (2014) one f the
leading isue is the availability of informatation, which may hindr an organisation from
identifying vulnerabilities. Contributing to this subject, Taylor (1989) notes that lack of
information could result from difficulties in gathering and analyzing data regarding the crisis.
Smith & Elliott (2007) noted that the second barrier arises from misundestanding that arises
from the language being used to communicate. According to Smith & Elliott (2007), while there
may be enough information being passed, the language of discourse between the organisation
and key stakeholders may be highly technical for non-experts to understand. As such, Stephens,
Malone & Bailey (2005) noted that some stakeholders may be excluded from the learning
processe particulary those stakeholders with limited resources. In fact, “legitimized” expertise
could be empoyed to prevent some external groups from taking part in the debate. Related to
this aspect, is the role played by experts. Some of the experts distort communication or
undermine the efforts of learning so that their views can be accepted and they may be obsolved
from blame.
Other barriers to organisation learning comes from the tendency by many organisations to
give little attenton and interest to lessons from crises that occurs near-miss occurances or crises
from other organisations. According to Toft and Reynolds (1997), the lack of enough attention
could be due to decoys in te organisation that diverts the attention of managers from focusing on
core issues. Therefore, Toft and Reynolds (1997) asserts that though specific lessons can be
learned by an organisation that can chgang the manner in which the organisation operates and the
Starbauck and Milliken (1998) noted that a barrier that arises from many situations is
cogntive narrowing and event fixation. In this case, the management of the organisation assumes
that crises are distinctive and constrained in time and space, and this hinders the learning
process. Sturges (1994); Lee (2005) points out that absence of interogrnizational learning will
arise if a crisis is overlooked asa function of a certain operating system of the organisation or its
culture. The perception that “such a thing cannot happen in this orgnization” hinders managers
Coombs (2014) underlined that lack of corporate responsibility from the orgnisation
affected by the crisis as well contributes to lack of learning. In such orgnisations, they tend to
follow the existing regulatory requirements. More so, the inclination to blame others also limits
leanring. These type of organisations also tend to focus a lot on single-loop instead of double
loop learning. The inability of organisations to challenge failture through applying effective
double-loop learning appears to ensure that such organisations do not learn good lessons from