Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Template
Dr. Misty McDowell SPD 590 Fall 2018
You will be completing this portion of the STEP document using the following
link:
STEP Standard 1, Part I
After completing the e-doc portion, submit the PDF you receive into the Learning
Management System (LMS).
You will be completing this portion of the STEP document using the following
link:
STEP Standard 1, Part II
After completing the e-doc portion, submit the PDF you receive into the Learning
Management System (LMS).
Unit Title: Fractions and Decimals are best friends: how to convert from fractions to decimals.
Learning Goal
By the end of this unit, students will be able to create a fraction, as described in a math problem,
and convert the fraction to a decimal. Advanced students will also learn to convert the decimal to
a percentage.
Measurable Objectives
My goal is for students to achieve each goal, with 90% correct answers. For some students this
may be a little too challenging, but it encourages growth and achievement.
1. create fractions from visual images
2. create fractions from word problems
3. demonstrate how a fraction can be written as a division problem and how a division problem
can be written as a fraction.
4. convert fractions to a decimal
*5. convert decimals to a percentage (for advanced students)
Exceeds (90%-100%)
Meets (70%-89%)
Approaches (60-69%)
Pre-Assessment Data: Whole Class - Once you have assessed your students’ knowledge on the topic,
collect and analyze the pre-assessment data to determine if you will need to modify the standards,
learning goal, or measurable objectives that will be addressed during instruction.
Number of Students
Exceeds (90%-100%) 5
Meets (70%-89%) 5
Approaches (60-69%) 6
Background: I am teaching grade 9-12 basic math. Each student is performing at a different level and
with different strengths and weaknesses. I have basic skills students through pre-algebra skill level
students. In addition, several of the students have had me for their math teacher for more than one
year.
Based on the above data, I will not make any changes to the core selection of national or state academic
standards. Although I do have 5 students who exceed standards, the remainder of the class can use
additional support. The pre-assessment, evaluated students on their ability to achieve the end goal of
converting a fraction to a decimal, in addition to the incremental objectives. I had an advanced
objective of converting decimals to percentages, which 10 of the students demonstrated the ability to
do (52.6% can complete the task). Because of this, I’m considering adding an additional advanced
application objective involving solving real-world word-problems using fractions, decimals, and
percentages.
I was very surprised by the pre-assessment data. I had expected students to perform at a lower level,
even though I have a broad range of students with a broad range of abilities. When reviewing the
assessments, I found that the students who exceeded standards, were students who I had taught the
year before. When I taught this topic, previously, I did it differently than I am doing this year. I am
impressed and please with the level of comprehension and skill retention, that students demonstrated.
Prior evaluations, when these students were taught by other instructors, did not demonstrate this level
of retention. This group of students will need to be working on application of fraction, decimal, and
percentage math skills to real-world problems, while the remainder of the class is working on enhancing
their skills in the objective areas.
I typically provide multiple levels of practice, each day, with each lesson, given the variety of student
achievement levels. This assessment demonstrates how that I will need to continue to do this, in
addition to encouraging real-world application. The data also causes me to consider that this topic
would be ideal, for students to learn, by groups. I intend to provide overall class instruction and then
have students break into groups to practice skills at the different levels. The students who are exceeding
standards will be working on advanced applications, while those who are at a lower level, will be
working to solidify conceptual understanding. This will also allow me to circulate through the room and
support each group in their areas of need, with focused mini-lessons.
My goal is for all students to at least meet standards, and for most of the students to exceed standards.
I set the level of expectation high for my students, because I feel that they can, at some point in their
lives, meet that level. My lessons rely heavily on repetition and rapid interventional support, by
circulating the room and providing as close to ‘immediate feedback’ as possible. I want to ensure that
students practice solving the problems correctly, rather than find out later that they did them wrong. It
does not facilitate learning for students to spend time practicing a skill with incorrect methods and
solutions.
Post-Assessment – Copy and paste the post-assessment you plan to use to assess the students’ knowledge
of the topic after implementing the unit lessons. The post-assessment can be the same as the pre-
assessment, a modified version, or something comparable that measures the same concepts. Include the
scoring criteria used to determine whether the student Exceeds, Meets, Approaches, or Falls Far Below the
learning goal and measurable objectives.
The post-assessment is the same as the post assessment and attached to this document
Meets (70%-89%)
Approaches (60-69%)
Instructional Application to Application to real- Application to real- Application to real- Application to real-
and real-world world challenges. world challenges. world challenges. world challenges.
Engagement challenges. The promise of The promise of The promise of The promise of
Strategies The promise of simplifying complex simplifying complex simplifying complex simplifying complex
What strategies simplifying material or areas of material or areas of material or areas of material or areas of
are you going complex material frustration. frustration. frustration. frustration.
to use with or areas of Helping students to Helping students to Helping students to Helping students to
your students frustration. master concepts that master concepts that master concepts that master concepts that
to keep them Helping students seem ‘too big or too seem ‘too big or too seem ‘too big or too seem ‘too big or too
engaged to master concepts hard’ hard’ hard’ hard’
throughout the that seem ‘too big Student participation Student participation Student participation Student participation
unit of study? or too hard’ Discussion Discussion Discussion Discussion
Post-Test Data: Whole Class - Once you have assessed your students’ learning on the topic, collect and
analyze the post-test data to determine the effectiveness of your instruction and assessment.
Number of Students Number of Students
Pre-Test Post-Test
Highly Proficient
(90%-100%) 5 (26%) 12 (60%)
Proficient
(80%-89%) 5 (26%) 5 (25%)
Partially
Proficient
6 (31%) 1 (5%)
(70%-79%)
Minimally
Proficient
3 (16%) 2 (10%)
(69% and below)
The pre-test demonstrated 52% of the class being proficient or highly proficient, with 47% being
partially or minimally proficient. After the unit, 85% of the class is proficient or highly proficient
and only 15% were in the proficient or minimally proficient. In addition, one student who scored
in the minimally proficient range, was absent for the lesson and misunderstood the instructions.
The additional advanced goal of students learning to convert fractions from decimals to
percentages, showed 52.6% proficiency on the pretest and 80% proficiency on the post-test.
The 33% increase in students performing in the top two proficiency categories, demonstrates that the
lesson was successful. In addition, the 32% decrease in the number of students scoring in the lowest two
categories for proficiency, demonstrates the growth, based on the lesson. What is of interest is that all
students in this class, except for two, have IEP’s. Many of these students struggle with information
retention. I was concerned that the retention struggles would be exacerbated, because the students had a
four-day holiday, after the lesson, and an additional two days of working on other math concepts before
the post-test occurred. However, clearly the students did understand the lesson and retain the concepts, for
there was a dramatic improvement in ability, after going for six days, without practicing the new concepts.
Under these circumstances, the data demonstrates to me that the lesson method was very effective.
Post-Assessment Analysis: Subgroup Selection
Nearly all students in this class are on an IEP. No students are receiving support for a 504 plan,
TAG, or ELL. This could be evaluated by grade level, because there are students from grades 9-
12 in the class, however, the grade levels are not represented equally (as little as one student),
which would result in inaccurate data. Because of this, gender would be the most reasonable
subgroup population, for analysis.
Post-Assessment Data: Subgroup (Gender, ELL population, Gifted, students on IEPs or 504s, etc.)
Falls Far Below Boys: 6 (43%); 2 (40%) Boys: 2 (14%); Girls (0%)
Both genders showed growth in their abilities. The boys showed the greatest improvement in
proficiency level, however, there were boys who continued to perform in the lowest two
proficiency categories after the lesson. The girls showed a smaller improvement in proficiency,
but there were no girls in the lowest two proficiency categories, after the lesson. The class is
made up of twice as many boys as girls, resulting in some potential factors for consideration, in
data analysis. The boys went from having 78% performing in the lowest two categories prior to
the lesson, to only 21% performing in these two categories after the lesson.
There is a significantly greater population of male students, than female students, in high school
basic math. Both populations showed dramatic improvements in performance levels, after the
lesson, which indicates that the lesson was taught effectively. In addition, as mentioned above,
students had six days of being out of school and/or not addressing the lesson topic, prior to post-
testing. This may have an affect on the gender discrepancy, in performance, due to potential
differences in long/short-term memory ability, since all students are on IEPs (except for two). The
primary alteration I would make to the lesson would be to assess the students immediately after
completion of the unit, to help control for the memory factor. However, having the time between
lesson completion and testing, demonstrates, arguably, a greater level of effectiveness,
considering student concept retention. Both populations demonstrated growth in learning, which
was significant.
(PLEASE SEE EVALUATION ABOVE FOR BOTH GROUPS OF DATA AND ANALYSIS)
Number of Students Number of Students
Pre-Test Post-Test
Exceeds # #
Meets # #
See above
Students gained significantly, through this lesson. Because of the level of growth, the next focus
for this lesson should be on concept expansion and application to real-life/real-world problems,
particularly those including personal finance. Since the class was demonstrating an eagerness to
learn and apply these skills, I expanded the lesson to include conversion of a decimal to a
percentage. In addition, we started utilizing real-world application, to draw connections to
concepts. This path needs to continue to be pursued, to demonstrate a need for the lesson content
and to encourage students to be engaged and retain the material.