Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Rhetorical Analysis:
Soil Geomorphology
Branden Montero
RWS 1301
Dr. Vierra
Abstract
The problem that is being understood is why rhetorical appeals are important to
understand. The participates that are included in this are Soil Geomorphology. The research that
is occurring is gathering information from previous scholars and books to further understand the
Rhetorical Analysis
Soil Geomorphology
Kain and Wardle (2004) agreed that key concepts for rhetoric are necessary to be
explained (p. 325) While analyzing readings it is necessary to understand these appeals, because
it’s important to understand the different ways the author is trying to appeal to us. It is significant
to understand these rhetorical appeals as you can apply them into your own writings to appeal to
the audience. The authors of the book used these appeals to be able to appeal to the audience that
The monograph of Soil geomorphology is written by more than one author however it
argues only one argument. According to Daniels and Hammer (1992), soil geomorphology is
when a scientist uses techniques to investigate soils. This type of technique is necessary in
determining the soil and how it react to the water. This is necessary for the research project as it
has to do with Arroyos. Because soil forms a change into arroyos, when the rain water has run
off from the mountain. This is why geomorphology is important because it allows to know if
there will be more of these arroyos and how they form. Because it’s known how the soil in the
area will react to the rain water that runs down from the mountain. This book leads to a certain
can have a broad range when it comes to categories. They can range from: poetry, Sci-Fi, and
more. In literature most, scholars base their genres usually off of two different kinds of genres.
The first one is called a Monograph which is a scholarly book that makes one argument. The
second kind of genre is called an Anthology, this has many arguments that are made up of many
arguments. Both of these genres share in common many things however the main one being that
the claim is usually always on the title of the novel or book. The genre that fits this book are the
RHETOICAL ANALYSIS 4
people that need information about their environment and how soil varies from different land
forms.
Discussion
Audience
Audience according to Wardle and Downs (2004), is when the speech is given before the
assembly (p.333). The authors are taking an interdisciplinary approach to reach a broader
audience. The reason that it is so broad is because it can range from many different people
reading the content. The reason this ranges it because it can go from the intended audience to the
actual audience. For the intended audience the author takes an interdisciplinary approach to make
a narrower approach. It was going to be for the people or students that were looking for
information on geomorphology. Which is the study of soil and how the land can change from it.
The actual audience is still the same, because the audience for this book is not for the general
public, it is intended more for an academic audience. According to Ede and Lunsford (1984) The
author needs to make to it more (p.154). This is needed because then the audience would become
Ethos
Explained by Wardle and Downs (2004), ethos is good character that consequent
credibility of the rhetor (p. 336). In Soil Geomorphology, the book is written by two different
authors that share the same concepts and ideas, this gives them credibility because they went to
school to study geomorphology and they both come together to write a book that gives it more
credibility. The first author Raymond Daniels studied at North Carolina State University. The
second author studied at University of Missouri (p. 5). Throughout the course of the book they
refer to previous books with information on soil and the affect that water has on it. As they
RHETOICAL ANALYSIS 5
mention “that no one is an expert in the field they study” (preface), so they try their best by
gathering other information to give the most precise information available. They do also mention
that they have 10 years of field experience with mapping soils (p. 15).
Pathos
Wardle and Downs (2004) claimed that pathos is an effective text will somehow activate
or draw upon the sympathies and emotions of the auditors (p. 338). While reading Soil
Geomorphology it is hard to have an emotional appeal to it at first. During the beginning you not
have any emotional connection because you don’t realize how it may pertain to you as it only
talks about “soil the reason why the soil varies on landscape”. (p. 1). Until the people of this field
of study are able to make the connection about how the soil can affect people. The main problem
that can occur from this may be landslides that can take away people’s homes. The way that it
can connect here to El Paso is through the arroyos. Once these arroyos overfill they can begin to
flood people’s homes and cause major issues to their homes. This is how the emotional appeal
begins to take over to the way that it can affect personal belongings.
Logos
Wardle and Downs (2004) claimed that logos is modes of reasoning that the audience
finds convincing and persuasive (p 338). In Soil Geomorphology, the authors are arguing one
point. The argument is that they are trying to show how soil properties vary (p. 3). By them
doing this it allows them to help problems that soil can have affect on. Some people will only
understand this however that are in this discourse community of studying this information. To
normal people it would just see like regular information. Instead the data that is included
provides information about how the soil works in different areas especially to water in that area.
RHETOICAL ANALYSIS 6
Conclusion
Its significant to understand the rhetorical appeals because so they can be applied to your
own work to be able to appeal to the audience. By knowing the meaning of each of these appeals
we can better understand the way the author is trying to grab our attention. By not noticing this it
Reference
Downs, D., Wardle, E. (2017). Rhetoric: How is meaning constructed in context? Writing about
writing: A college reader (3rd ed., pp. 447-456). Boston, New York: Bedford /St.
Martin’s.
Daniels, R. B., & Hammer, R. D. (1992). Soil geomorphology New York: Wiley, c1992. Retrieved
from http://0-
search.ebscohost.com.lib.utep.edu/login.aspx?direct=true&db=cat04704a&AN=nug.b1481850
&site=eds-live&scope=site