Maududi and Qumaini

JI called the Qumaini as a Great Personality. They

say Sd. Maududi is also Great personality. So how
can be both Qumainy and Sd. Maududi be great
personalities for a Muslim who follow Quran and
Sunnah. Then there must be something common
between these two personalities. (Qumainy and
Maududi).
z Yes, let us see some points and proof, then we will
understand why JI wants to justify the Rafidas as
Muslim to hide the fact that they(JI) are rafidies in the
name of Islam. (See page 68 Ibadath Oru Samgra Padanam by KC)

This is "hakimiyathulla" Maududi cooked in his

mind It was not known to mufassireen / fuqkahs
before him. See Qumainy has also the same
concept.
 See Maududies and Seyyid Quthb books have
helped for Iran revolutions. Prahodanam 1999
July 3 page 28

z Nuri Tibiris, one of the most renowned Shi'ite scholars and mujtahids,
wrote a book against the present Quran. The book is entitled: 'Faslul
Khitab Fi Tahreefi-Kitabi Rabbil Arbaab' (The Final Verdict on the
Distortion of the Book of the Lord of Lords)

z Khomeini mentions this scholar with great respect in his Al-Hukumatul

Islamiyah" (The Islamic State). In fact, Khomeini has actually used
Nuri Tibiris's work entitled "Mustadrakul Wasail" to complete his theory
of Wilayatul Faqih.

So Qumaini has also the same concept of

Hakimiyath. KC in the above book mentions the
Hakimiyyha Maududi envisaged has been
implemented in Iran. Not yet implemented in
Hiijaaz (aoodubilla)
z There were instances of agreements and approvals
from the Qumainy’s to accept / confirm Sd. Maududi
during his life time. Did Qumainies agreed / approved
any scholars of Sunnis OTHER THAN Sd.Maududi?
(See the attached file: What Shias says about the
ulama of Sunnath Jamath). If Shias said the Ulema of
 Sunnath Jamath as murthad and Kafir at the same
time agreed / approved only Sd.Maududi, what does it
mean?. It means Sd. Maududi is an agent of Shias to
propagate Shiaism among the Sunnath Jamath by
wearing the gown of Sunnath Jamath. The same job
JI has been doing by translating the books of Shias.
Maududi was a close friend of Khomeini and was
sympathetic to his course. In a book titled, 'Two brothers -
Maududi and Khomeini' page 129, the following statement of Dr Ahmad
Farouk Maududi (son of Abul-A'ala Maududi) was published in Roz
Naame, Lahore - 29 September 1979,"Allama Khomeini had a very old
and close relationship with Abba Jaan (father). Aayaatullah Khomeini
translated his (fathers) books in Farsi and included it as a subject in
Qum. Allama Khomeini met my father in 1963 during Hajj and my
father's wish was to create a revolutionary in Pakistan similar to Iran.
He was concerned about the success of the Iranian revolution till his last
breath.'

See the book Minhaj Al Ambiya of Sh. Rabeeh

page 157 the same friendship of Qumainy and
Maududi we can read.

z Sd. Maududi is the first person (outside the Shias)

who called the Iran revolution as Islamic revolution.
Sd.Maududi is the first person (from otherthan Shias)
who called “Iran Revolution as Islamic Revolution” /
supported / advise the world to support Qumainy’s
Iran revolution. In the news paper of Ihwaanul
Muslimoon Sd.Maududi said “thourathul Qumainy
 thaurathul Islamia” Verily Iran Revolution as Islamic
Revolution So every body has to support Qumainy..”

z When Sd. Maududi died the news in the Official press

of Qunany’s “Al Majlist-Shia” said in the front page
after giving the photo of Maududi “ today the world is
in sorrow due to the death of usthad Maududi”. When
we say this JI can ask “Why to wonder for the news in
the press of Shias about the death of such a great
personality known all over the world like Maududi,
the first recipient of King Faisal Award..” OK. No
problem.. leave it.. But continue the news in Al
Majlist-Shia continues as “Still… no problem we have
the book from Usthad Maududi named “Al kilafath
Wal Mulk” (What is the specialty of that book; where
in there are instances of strong accusing and scolding
against Aboobacker, Umar, Othman and Aysh and
Muawiya(RAA)). press continued “so even if Usathad
Maududi died.. the book “Al kilafath Wal Mulk will
flourish here”.
I gave this book to read to a Pakistani friend; (I swear
by Allah) after reading page 103-108; he told me
"sorry I can not read this, because it will affect my
love to wards Othman (R)."
So brother think.. If shia says that the book Kilaafath
wal Mulk will flourish.. who is benefited with that
book? Shias or Sunnath Jamath?. Sure Shias.. It is not
possible for any body from Sunnath Jamath to write a
book accusing / scolding Aboobacker, Umar, Othman
and Aysh (RA). The same book has been translated in
to Malayalam also in the name “Islamul
Raajawaychayum”. Then the JI workers can asking.
The JI scholars did not see this? What they say about
this?. Yes at least the person who translated the book
 in to Malayalam has seen this. But translation is made
by omitting these accusing and scolding.

z When Qumaini died Prabhodanam (24/06/1989) wrote

"Qumainiyude viyogam Islamika lokathinu theera
Nastam". Death of Qumaini an ever loss for Islamic
world. The Qunainy who said Quran is corrupted,
Jibril Mistaken, called Othman(R) and Yazid(R) as
rascals, called Sahabas as Murthad, Kafir, called all
Muslims are off-springs of prostitutes has dies, sure it
is loss for JI but not for the Muslims who believe in
Allah and Akhirath.

z All the above evidences are convincing us that

Maududi and JI has a close liaison with the Qumaines
and Rafidies. See more shiaism with Maududi.

z In the explanation of the verse 2:1 Maududi has

rejected the opinion of 5 Sahabas (Abubacker, Omer,
Othman, Ali and Ibn Masoud(RAA). See Ibn kathir
Tafseer.

See Thafsser Ali Muhsin Khan

 Now see what Maududi said about this

See one more example that Maududi has rejected

the opinion of Ibn Abbas, Imam Buhaari, Imam
Masai, Imam Thabri and Al Awfi.
Ibn kathir Tafseer. Verse 28:85
See Ali Muhsin Khan

See Amaani Maulawi