Bachelor of Management Research Project 1

STRATEGIC THINKING FOR MANAGERS RESEARCH PROJECT

Student’s Name

Course Name

Professor Name

Institution

City

Date
 Bachelor of Management Research Project 2

Abstract

Basically, strategic reasoning and strategic arrangements are always ideas which are not

obviously characterized mutually in the writing and in the act of business associations and in

some cases, they are utilized reciprocally with one another or using various strategic

administration policies. Therefore, the main motivation behind this content is separating and

characterizing the two ideas and relaying their importance with the basic strategic leadership

procedures of any organization. On the contrary the content finishes by moving toward the issue

of supportability as another test in the in evaluating strategic procedures.

Keyword: Strategic reasoning, Strategic arrangements, Leadership, Strategy

 Bachelor of Management Research Project 3

Introduction

Actually, there is yet a broad assertion pertaining strategic reasoning which is critical for

proficient administration of organizations, yet usually missing or being deficient (Bonn, 2001;

Liedtka, 1998). The slit by and by is trailed using verifiable disarray of the idea amid researchers

and experts, pointing out terms such as strategic reasoning, strategic arrangement, and strategic

administration which are utilized conversely. Therefore, there is much worry that the gap will

proceed. Bonn (2005), noticed the fact that strategic reasoning was distinguished by a board of

specialists as being among the 10 most basic zones for imminent administration inquiries. Also,

strategy and Leadership scholars have been showing that strategic reasoning is required at

specific hierarchical dimensions (Mintzberg, 1994).

On the other hand, Goldman et al. (2015), contends that "In spite of the agreement on the

requirement for strategic reasoning, general counsel ought to be sustained by most associations

since there is meager writing on what associations really do in order to encourage pioneers,

managers, while others hired by the firm build up their capacity for thinking deliberately, why

they do it, how they do it, and how much their endeavors are successful." On account of strategic

basic leadership, Eisenhardt and Zbaracki (1992) assert about a focal point among strategic

processes which is undermining strategic leadership. As a result, this is pivoted on the grounds

that it includes essential choices that shape the progression of any organization. Amid the last 30

years, numerous scientists have been perceiving about the centrality of the subject through

handling matters in a strategic and conclusively, authoritative basic leadership.

Research aims and objectives

The main aim of this paper is evaluating the process through which strategic planning aided by

various action aid in order to boost presentation of these programs

 Bachelor of Management Research Project 4

Methodology

In this paper primary data sources were employed through the use of interviews acquired through

intellectual gatherings. Therefore, the fundamental instrument of information accumulation why

they do it the during this analysis was structuring interview schemes. Designed interviews and

inside and out interviews were the two kinds of interviews utilized during the research

assessment. Within the organized interviews, accentuation was based on acquiring answers to the

deliberately stated inquiries while under top to bottom meetings, the questioners looked to

empower free and open reactions, and this permitted an exchange off between complete

inclusion of themes and inside and out investigation of a progressively restricted arrangement of

inquiries. Patton (2002) affirms that, the nature of the data acquired through this technique is

generally reliant on the questioner's abilities and identity.

This paper is enlivened in by three optional data sources (secondary sources) acquired from

Ingrid Bonn (2001, 2005, 2011) and supplemented with various outcomes from a pursuit in the

logical assets such as EBSCO and Google Researcher with the subjects "strategic reasoning",

"strategic arrangement", "strategic basic leadership" and "strategic administration", distributed

from 1985 which occasioned a list of about 35 articles acquired from fundamental referred

writers, for example, Jeanne Liedtka, Ellen Goldman, Kathleen Eisenhardt, Michael Doorman

and Loizos Heracleous, and Henry Mintzberg. Additionally, the research paper was aided by

various exemplary e-books, which include, "Theoretical hypothesis of a firm" and "Corporate

Procedure" and with original articles.

 Bachelor of Management Research Project 5

Literature review

1.1.The need of strategy in firms

According to Mintzberg (1978) he places: "What are procedures and how are they framed in

many firms? An extensive assortment of writing, handled under the strategy section within the

secluded part, and policy drafting within the general public, discourses the subject of how firms

create and interrelate their huge strategic choices." Additionally, Liedtka (2000) states that the

strategic field, is essentially worried about the scan for manageable upper hand and as the bound

of progress within the business sector quickens, this center converts it into a methodological

procedure based on outfitting firms with the ability of bargaining effectively with this evolving

condition.

In addition to that, Hamel and Prahalad (1993) provide the accompanying response to the inquiry

"Define strategy?": “Therefore a considerable number of directors within the expansive Western

organizations, they suggest that the most appropriate response is essentially focused on 3

components: the idea of fit, the connection amid organization and its aggressive condition; the

designation of assets among contending venture openings; and a long-haul viewpoint whereby

"tolerant cash" figures noticeably." More likely to comprehend the need of this methodology,

Ansoff (1963) gives the option of "lack of strategy" and points out that: "The subject of the

helpfulness of procedure as an administrative apparatus should, subsequently, be inspected. This

will be achieved by first looking into an option in contrast to procedure.

Such an option is to have no tenets past the straightforward choice to look under such conditions

the organization for productive projections which does not choose formal destinations, plays out

no examinations, figure no hunt and assessment instructions." Therefore, the literature continues

endlessly clarifying what is the strategy and the reason behind organizations needing them, and
 Bachelor of Management Research Project 6

despite the fact that these descriptions and thoughts change, a clear end is pointed out which will

be that the technique is important in order to enable organizations achieve their stated

destinations, outcomes and hence develop and endure.

1.2.Rationale between Strategic reasoning and strategic arrangement

According to Ansoff (1965) he explained that each accomplished official knows, a noteworthy

piece of an administrator's time is involved in a day by day procedure of settling on various

choices. From that point forward, the scan for the correct strategy for enhancing basic leadership

and upgrade upper hand has grieved a great deal among supervisors and corporate pioneers and

still today this is by all accounts the case, as Reeves et al (2015) confirms. Within the business

domain which is drastically changing and ending up to be increasingly unverifiable and complex

nearly constantly, it's never been progressively vital to pick the correct way to deal with the

technique. Mintzberg (1994) has pointed out the way organizations were blending ideas, between

key arranging, considering and programming, and among dreams and plans which would just

lead them to a misguided course they should seek after. He is resolute attesting that "Strategic

arrangement isn't strategic reasoning".

Such a thought is pointed out by Bonn (2001) by emphasizing about there being no assertion in

the writing on what strategic reasoning is all about. Various scholars have utilized the term

conversely with different ideas, for example, strategic arrangement or strategic overseeing. In

addition to that, Heracleous (1998), fortifies this thought by setting an investigation of the

literature uncovering no concession to what strategic reasoning is all about, the thing that

strategic arrangement is, or what their relationship ought to be. Such misguided judgments were

affirmed in concentrates by Goldman (2012) in the period amid 1985-2010 that clearly

recognized nonattendance of strategic reasoning at best pioneers was depicted as a noteworthy

 Bachelor of Management Research Project 7

reason for hierarchical execution and when vital reasoning was available, better corporate

choices would have been made and more noteworthy esteem gave to constituents.

Three explanations behind the key reasoning hole have been recommended in the literature: an

absence of comprehension of the idea by and large; steady expert and theoretician perplexity of

the expression "key reasoning" with "key arranging" and also other vital administration terms

and apparatuses, for example, a SWOT (qualities, shortcomings, openings, and dangers)

examination and constrained improvement of vital reasoning among hierarchical pioneers. It

turns out to be much progressively basic in the present situation where "Directors and different

business pioneers confront a difficulty: with progressively assorted conditions to oversee and

rising stakes to hit the nail on the head, how would they distinguish the best way to deal with

business procedures. Consequently, Heracleous (1998) separates the two ideas as pursues: "Vital

arranging is regularly used to allude to an automatic, expository manner of thinking and key

reasoning to allude to an innovative, dissimilar point of view.

Such a thought has been fortified by Mintzberg (1994), by pointing out various arrangements

that are dependably been relating to examination of separating an objective or a list of objectives

into procedures, thus sanctifying such means they can be executed consequently through

articulating the foreseen outcomes or consequences of each progression. Strategic reasoning,

conversely, is about blend. It includes instinct and imagination. The result of vital reasoning is a

coordinated viewpoint of the undertaking. Additionally, Liedtka (2000) contends that strategic

arrangements pursue strategic reasoning, and afterward chooses targets, item/advertise decisions

and different elements of management and regulation. Based on Ansoff analysis he points out

that procedures are utilized inside a business firm. It tends to be inferred that a vital arrangement

dependably takes a journey, for the most part anticipating future monetary returns, assessing
 Bachelor of Management Research Project 8

future dangers that influence investor esteem, and choosing what should be accomplished

(Richardson, 2010).

1.3.Strategic thinking obligation

The writing characterizes vital reasoning comprehensively as a fundamental segment of

technique advancement, a psychological, intelligent and issue-arranged process that has the

reason to grow new systems and that may occur previously, amid or after key arranging.

(Goldman, 2012). In spite of the definitely known ideas of vital reasoning, Bonn (2005)

considers the consideration for the way that there is a requirement for more research that can

assist us with bettering comprehend key reasoning. Such understanding would give a critical

missing connection in vital administration inquire about and empower us to get an increasingly

sensible picture of vital leaders and basic leadership. Likewise, it would help rehearsing

administrators to create techniques for enhancing vital reasoning in their associations.

Thus strategic reasoning is manufactured. It looks for inward arrangement and comprehends

interdependencies. Thus, it is fundamental in its core interest. It requires the capacity to

comprehend and incorporate crosswise over dimensions and components, both even and vertical,

and to adjust techniques over those dimensions. Another approach to characterize key reasoning

is that it is a calculated, frameworks arranged, directional and sharp process that drives the

disclosure of new and inventive techniques that are executed as it is made.

This inventive, mental and imaginative qualities related to the vital reasoning definition can be

identified with the idea of vital plan, characterized by Hamel and Prahalad (1989) as a fixation

on winning, an imagine of wanted initiative position, an idea that incorporates a functioning

administration process, inspiring individuals and leaving space for individual and gathering

commitment, continuing energy and utilizing aim to reliably control asset distribution enabling
 Bachelor of Management Research Project 9

organizations to go past their assets and abilities. They express that strategic expectation gives

consistency to transient activity, while leaving space for reinterpretation as new open doors rise.

The significance of the job of key reasoning can be clarified twofold: by the organizations have

to discover and receive the correct technique and, in view of the writing, by the absence of

proficient key reasoning in associations.

Also, Pretorius (2008) points out that the basic reason for a decrease and disappointment is as

often as possible classed as either key or operational in nature vital causes have to do with

powerless or wrong situating in the market, mechanical changes that oversee request

determinants and loss of upper hand by the endeavor vital causes by and large require

progressively quick activity. Consequently, Liedtka (2006) calls a "duck" the production of

images and says that much a similar thing is going on in numerous business associations today.

With an end goal to show up strategic,'' partnerships are making a ton of ducks - techniques that

work as images, not guides. Methodologies that show up, at a separation, to offer and drawing in

yet very close, simply aren't very useful to anybody particularly the general population in the

association who require them most.

1.4.Managers/Planner and Key Leadership Processes

When the ideas concerning vital reasoning and dynamic processes are separated, it is imperative

to unmistakably characterize the mandate of planners and leaders, to enhance the basic

leadership process, as Porter (1996) argues that aggressive techniques are tied in with being

extraordinary. It implies intentionally picking an alternate exercise planning to convey proper

and value management skills. Mintzberg (1994) characterizes planning skills as a formalized

technique to create a verbalized result, as coordinated choices of planning. As it were, leading

and planning are about formalization, which implies the deterioration of a procedure into defined
 Bachelor of Management Research Project 10

enhancements. Planning methodologies are connected with 'level-headed' analysis, which is a

procedure that ought to happen after vital reasoning (Mintzberg 1994, Bonn, 2001) in a way that

empowers key reasoning and not to demoralize it (Mintzberg 1994). Mintzberg (1994) separates

the jobs of organizers and managers, where the previous have time, certain systems and above all

a tendency to do the investigation.

In this sense, Hamel and Prahalad (1993) express that every day; representatives interact with

new clients, take in more about contenders, stand up to and take care of specialized issues, and

find better methods for getting things done. Nevertheless, a few organizations are superior to

others at extricating information from those encounters. Mintzberg (1994) claims that, in view of

writing exploration and his own encounters, by and large what is called key arranging is as a

general rule key programming and that given reasonable, stable procedures, the job of arranging

the one job of arranging progresses toward becoming to program them, that is, to execute as

opposed to define them (Mintzberg, 1994). Regardless, it is imperative for organizations to

permit the right combination among organizers and chiefs so methodology does not end up

unbending and bureaucratic, and prompts a circumstance recognized by Sokol (1992) that

expresses that "When conversing with leaders of little to medium-measure organizations, I as

often as possible experience the accompanying objection.

They have a 100-page vital arrangement, created by outside advisors. It was never actualized.

Consequential to the right arrangement among organizers and supervisors is compelling vital

basic leadership, a theme of extraordinary enthusiasm for the field of vital administration

(Eisenhardt and Zbaracki, 1992) which past investigations have given critical bits of knowledge

into its procedures (Eisenhardt 1989). Bonn (2005) claims that a superior comprehension of key

reasoning would give a critical missing connection in key administration investigate and
 Bachelor of Management Research Project 11

empower us to acquire a progressively sensible picture of vital leaders and basic leadership.

What's more, it would help rehearsing supervisors to create methodologies for enhancing key

reasoning in their associations. Cyert and March (1963) states that; in the event that we wish to

build up a hypothesis that predicts and clarifies business basic leadership conduct, we confront

an issue that can be summarized as far as the accompanying:

 Individuals (i.e. the people) have objectives; collectivities of individuals do not.

 To characterize a hypothesis of authoritative basic leadership, we appear to require

something undifferentiated from – at the hierarchical dimension – to singular objectives

at the individual dimension.

Bonn (2011) states that the vital basic leadership process is worried about the manner in which

choices are come to in an authoritative setting and incorporates the exercises that pave the way to

and bolster the decision of methodology. In this sense, examines suggest that key reasoning

ought to be tended to at both individual and gathering levels so as to enhance the nature of key

choices (Bonn, 2001; Amason and Schweiger, 1994). They strengthen the possibility that to

actualize choices organizations require the interest of colleagues, in a setting where

representatives can add to the general vision of the association and permit innovativeness and

development. Bonn (2001) states that the mandate of managers is to structure and build up a

workplace where everybody is urged to investigate new thoughts, concoct upgrades and

developments. By including the individual and the gathering dimension of the organization's

workers and tending to the components of vital reasoning (frameworks considering, imagination,

vision, and so forth), directors can always filter the inward and the outside conditions and help

them decide.
 Bachelor of Management Research Project 12

In their investigations, Steptoe-Warren, Howat and Hume (2011) contend that it was declared

that procedures planned with learning from center administration and other applicable people

inside an association are crucial. This is better than simply the key mastermind is probably going

to be better as thought is given than both data seeing what activities are required and also

whether the moves to be made are operationally conceivable regarding assets (staff and materials

and so forth. The idea created by Eisenhardt, Kahwajy &Bourgeois III (1997) strengthens this

thought by attesting that "the capacity of senior officials to cooperate as a durable and viable

group is basic to the achievement of the firm. Together, individuals from the best supervisory

crew shape the vision of the enterprise as well as understandable and execute that vision through

an on-going arrangement of gathering connections and choices.

This thought is likewise shared by Liedtka (2000) that insists researchers contemplating the

subject of the more extensive incorporation of supervisors in procedure influencing procedures to

have noticed various critical favorable circumstances to such consideration. Bower and Gilbert

(2007) had better portray the ramifications of the absence of arrangement among procedures and

every dimensions of an association. In their article, they investigated the jobs of midlevel chiefs

in various organizations and discover that occasionally they settle on choices independent from

anyone else paying little respect to the introduction of central station and consequently the

system of the organization. They express the way that at any organization duty is partitioned up

among different people and units have indispensable ramifications for how methodology gets

made. What's more, pursue creating procedure is an iterative, constant process; duties must be

made, at that point either reexamined or ventured up as new substances develop. Because

learning and power have authoritative dimensions, managers at each dimension are probably

going to affect technique.

 Bachelor of Management Research Project 13

Data Analysis

According to a survey carried out in the paper it was founded that 47.7 percent of organizations

considered supportability and corporate obligation, which is an imperative driver of

development. In any case, for the lion's share of organizations, seeing how to make their

organizations increasingly feasible was a test. The zones that represented the best test for roughly

80 percent of organizations were distinguishing and organizing issues, creating systems and

approaches and estimating execution. This finding is in accordance with episodic proof from our

counseling work. The Director of Sustainability of a vast assembling organization in New South

Wales, Australia, for instance, expressed for us, maintainability is critical, both at the vital and at

the operational dimensions. That is the reason we made the position Director of Sustainability

around a half-year back.

In any case, for me, as Director of Sustainability, the test is to recognize the regions that require

a more noteworthy maintainability center, to create fitting procedures and to administer their

usage. It is an extremely mind-boggling process. This thought is shared by Stead and Stead

(2013) that contends that manageability has turned out to be focal in the public arena and it has

likewise turned into a focal worry in the business condition prompting a significant move in the

key setting. They discovered that in the review, specialists found that organizations completely

holding onto maintainability as a key issue could effectively execute beneficial preemptive

systems in new socially and naturally situated market space, and they additionally discovered

that organizations that were just calmly embracing manageability as a vital activity were not able

adequately contend in this new market space.

90% of the reacting officials said that actualizing manageability methodologies is currently or

will be an aggressive need for their associations, and 70% said that they have put maintainability
 Bachelor of Management Research Project 14

on their vital motivation inside the previous 6 years. Half of the reacting officials said that they

had changed their fundamental plans of action to join supportability on account of the vital open

doors that it gives them, a full 20% expansion over the earlier year's review. It is contended that

for associations to accomplish manageability, chiefs must address the distinctive parts of

maintainability amid the key basic leadership process and consolidate them into their corporate,

business and useful dimension systems. Eight diverse economical techniques that might be

connected to create and immature markets: eco-productivity, Socio-effectiveness, item

stewardship, environmental change, rising business, reasonable highlighting, co-advancement,

and BOP (base of the pyramid) procedures.

This new layer of trouble in the methodology procedure is specifically identified with the issue

of vital reasoning in organizations to succeed this new test. Managers must embrace a radical

new vision in its hierarchical culture, at all dimensions, as we contend that in the event that

associations are to wind up progressively maintainable, chiefs need to guarantee that

manageability is incorporated into the technique procedure from the earliest starting point and is

tended to on a continuous premise. Distinguished issues chiefs encounter when attempting to

make their associations increasingly maintainable. Portions of these issues are because of

directors tending to maintainability as an operational as opposed to as a key issue.

4. Discussion and Conclusion

This paper offers contentions to separate the ideas of key arranging and vital reasoning as created

over the most recent thirty years of research and distinguishes that there is still perplexity

between these ideas that have by one way or another impacted experts and scholastics amid this

period. From a specialist's viewpoint, the writing proposes that there is yet an absence of key

reasoning in organizations, which prompts awful techniques in these manner awful choices, in a
 Bachelor of Management Research Project 15

world that is being progressively focused, the question of quicker changes and with considerably

more perplexing requests that can affect in the survival of these organizations. In concurrence

with the thoughts of Liedka (2000), this paper safeguards that vital planning ought to pursue vital

reasoning and supervisors are vital to execute systems to plan and build up a workplace. A good

workforce allows everybody to investigate new thoughts and to think of enhancements and

advancements, through a consistent appraisal of both outer and inner conditions, with more

possibilities for enhanced outcomes (Bonn 2001).

In view of the writing talked about in this paper, it tends to be reasoned that the correct

arrangement of these distinctive ideas of methodology with the attention on the advancement of

vital reasoning would prompt better choices that would enhance results, particularly when

created inside all dimensions of the association, both individual and with the gathering. It is

concurred that key reasoning is an increasingly innovative, visionary and intelligent process that

gives a more extensive and better learning of the organization and its business. This permits a

general enhancement of the board, particularly as long as possible and in this manner, maintain a

strategic distance from what has been brought up by Mintzberg (1994) as: the supposed

multiyear plan which is just a mechanical extrapolation of current information, with no

impression of the executives’ choices and judgment; such an activity is absolutely useless. The

significance of this article turns out to be progressively current assumptions that Reeves et al

(2015) illustrates. The research analysis presents various strategies that have been evaluated over

the years. Significantly, new strategies, which are fundamental for business expansion, are

proposed. The proposed concepts and strategies are significant since they enable organizational

managers to embrace the correct measures that assure sustainability and development in

business.
 Bachelor of Management Research Project 16

The issues on sustainability offer a genuine and applicable point of view demonstrating that the

business world is under the interest of embracing significant changes with support from various

partners to change the plans of action and enhance its items and systems. These requests

asserting for reasonable improvement is in the motivation of most vast organizations which just

strengthens the requirement for an expanded duty of groups, a quicker capacity to respond and

new, coordinated techniques that enables organizations to accurately address these necessities,

which will be just conceivable through the advancement of vital reasoning in their everyday

business. No exact information is exhibited, however a large number of the articles used to help

the ideas are supported by measurements and contextual analyses, by and by more degree and

observational research, which can recognize and assess the key reasoning capacity of directors

are proposed alongside ID of criteria that can anticipate long haul key reasoning capacity.
 Bachelor of Management Research Project 17

Reference

Amason, A. C., & Schweiger, D. M. (1994). Resolving The Paradox of Conflict, Strategic

Decision Making , and Organizational Performance. International Journal of Conflict

Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb022745

Ansoff, H. I. (1965). Corporate Strategy. An analytic approach to Business Policy for Grwoth

and Expansion.

McGraw & Hill, New York. Bonn, I. (2005). Improving strategic thinking: A multilevel

approach. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 26(5), 336–354.

https://doi.org/10.1108/01437730510607844

Bonn, I. (2001). Developing strategic thinking as a core competency. Management Decision.

https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000005408

Bonn, I., & Fisher, J. (2011). Sustainability : the missing ingredient in strategy. Journal of

Business Strategy. https://doi.org/10.1108/02756661111100274

Bower, J. L., & Gilbert, C. G. (2007). Create or Destroy Your Company's Strategy. Harvard

Business Review, (February 2007).

Casey, A. J., & Goldman, E. F. (2010). Enhancing the ability to think strategically : A learning

model. Management Learning. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507609355497

Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Prentice Hall.

Eisenhardt, K. M., & Zbaracki, M. J. (1992). Strategic decision making. Strategic Management

Journal, 13, 17–37. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250130904

 Bachelor of Management Research Project 18

Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). MAKING FAST STRATEGIC DECISIONS IN HIGH-VELOCITY

ENVIRONMENTS. Academy of Management Journal, 543–576. https://doi.org/10.2307/256434

Eisenhardt, K. M., Kahwajy, J. L., & Bourgeois III, L. J. (1997). Conflict and strategic choice:

How Top Management Teams disagree. California Management Review, 39(2),

https://doi.org/10.2307/41165886

Goldman, E. (2009). Experiences That Develop the Ability to Think Strategically. Journal of

Healthcare Management, 403–418. Goldman, E. F. (2006). Strategic Thinking at the Top. AoM,

1–7.

Goldman, E. F. (2012). Leadership practices that encourage strategic thinking. Journal of

Strategy and Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/17554251211200437

Goldman, E. F., & Casey, A. (2010). Building a Culture That Encourages Strategic Thinking.

Journal of Leadershiop & Organizational Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051810369677

Goldman, E. F., Scott, A. R., & Follman, J. M. (2015). Organizational practices to develop

strategic thinking. Journal of Strategy and Management, 8(2), 155.

https://doi.org/10.1108/JSMA-01-2015-0003

Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1989). Strategic Intent. Harvard Business Review.

Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. (1993). Strategy as stretch and leverage. Harvard Business Review.

Heracleous, L. (1998). Strategic thinking or strategic planning? Long Range Planning, 31(3),

481–487. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-6301(98)80015-0

Liedtka, J. (1998). Strategic Thinking : Can it be Taught ? Long Range Planning, 6301(97).

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-6301(97)00098-8
 Bachelor of Management Research Project 19

Liedtka, J. (2006). Is your strategy a duck ? Journal of Business Strategy. Liedtka, J. (2000). In

Defense of Strategy as Design. California Management Review, (3).

https://doi.org/10.2307/41166040

Liedtka, J. (2000). Strategic Planning as a Contributor to Strategic Change : A Generative Model.

European Management Journal, 18(2), 195–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-2373(99)00091-2

Mintzberg, H. (1994a). The Fall and Rise of Strategic Planning. Harvard Business Review, 107–

114.

Mintzberg, H. (1994b). Rethinking strategic planning part I: Pitfalls and fallacies. Long Range

Planning, 27(3), 12–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-6301(94)90185-6

Mintzberg, H. (1994c). Rethinking strategic planning part II: New roles for planners. Long

Range Planning, 27(3), 22–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-6301(94)90186-4

Mintzberg, H., & Waters, J. (1985). Of Strategies , Deliberate and Emergent. Strategic

Management Journal, 6(March 1983), 257–272. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250060306

Mintzberg, H., &Westley, F. (1992). Cycles of organizational change. Strategic Management

Journal, 13, 39. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250130905

Mintzbergt, H. (1978). PATTERNS IN STRATEGY FORMATION. Management Science,

24(9), 934–949. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.24.9.934