Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
1. ANOVA
i. ASSOCIATION BETWEEN FINANCE PROBLEMS AND TYPE OF
ORGANISATION(TO)
ANOVA
Finance Problem
Sum of df Mean F Sig.
Squares Square
Between Groups 6.751 2 3.375 7.808 .000
Within Groups 171.626 397 .432
Total 178.377 399
ANOVA
Finance Problem
Sum of df Mean F Sig.
Squares Square
Between Groups 12.331 2 6.166 14.741 .000
Within Groups 166.046 397 .418
Total 178.377 399
ANOVA
Finance Problem
Sum of df Mean F Sig.
Squares Square
Between Groups .745 2 .372 .832 .436
Within Groups 177.633 397 .447
Total 178.377 399
iv. ASSOCIATION BETWEEN FINANCE PROBLEMS AND MANUFACTURING
ACTIVITY (MA)
ANOVA
Finance Problem
Sum of df Mean F Sig.
Squares Square
Between Groups 4.589 1 4.589 10.509 .001
Within Groups 173.788 398 .437
Total 178.377 399
ANOVA
Finance Problem
Sum of df Mean F Sig.
Squares Square
Between Groups 2.481 3 .827 1.862 .135
Within Groups 175.896 396 .444
Total 178.377 399
2. FACTORIAL ANOVA
Between-Subjects Factors
Value Label N
TO 1 Sole Proprietorship 281
2 Partnership 64
3 Private Ltd 55
SOU 1 Micro 187
2 Small 177
3 Medium 36
NA 1 Manufacturing 335
2 Repair & Maintenance 22
3 Service 43
MA 1 Own Marketing 383
2 Sub-Contracting 17
YE 1 Below 10 years 87
2 11 to 20 years 168
3 21 to 30 years 100
4 31 and above 45
OUTPUT
With alpha level of 0.05 the Factorial ANCOVA has conducted for explanatory
variables, scale of operation, type of organization, nature of activity, manufacturing
activity and year of existence on the financial problem facing. The explanatory
variables nature of activity (F – 0.821, df - 2, p = 0.441) and year of existence (F –
0.630, df - 3, p = 0.596) accept the null hypothesis. What they indicates? The
different groups comes under the exogenous variables nature of activity
(manufacturing=3.32, repairs and maintenance=3.19, services =2.94) and year of
existence (first generation, mean value=3.33, second mean =3.35, third mean=3.25
and fourth mean= 4.14) unanimously agreeing the statement that they are facing
financial problems. The other variables scale of operation (F – 10.810, df - 2, p –
value = 0.000) type of organization (F – 5.219, df - 2, p – value = 0.006) and
manufacturing activity (F – 4.799, df - 1, p – value = 0.029) are rejecting the null
hypothesis informing that among the group, there is a differences. In all the groups
comes under five explanatory variables, accept or reject the null hypothesis, their
differences in the perceptions are on the agreeing or strongly agreeing the
statements meaning that the respondents unanimously agreeing the statements that
they are facing financial problems.
Between-Subjects Factors
Value Label N
Type of Organisation 1 Sole Proprietorship 281
2 Partnership 64
3 Private Ltd 55
Scale of Operation 1 Micro 187
2 Small 177
3 Medium 36
Between-Subjects Factors
Value Label N
Nature of Activity 1 Manufacturing 335
2 Repair & 22
Maintenance
3 Service 43
Manufacturing Activity 1 Own Marketing 383
2 Sub-Contracting 17
Year of Existence 1 Below 10 years 87
2 11 to 20 years 168
3 21 to 30 years 100
4 31 and above 45
OUTPUT