Proficiency Test

Charpy Impact Test

(CIT 2004)

Final Report

March, 17th 2005

Institut für Eignungsprüfung

Langenbochumer Str. 310, D-45701 Herten

DAP-IS-3779.00/00L04

Organisation:
Prof. Dr.-Ing. H. Frenz; Head of Inspection body
Prof. Dr.-Ing. C. Vogt
Dipl.-Ing. E. Krämer
Dipl.-Ing. C. Weißmüller

Advisory Board:
Dr.-Ing. R. Landgrebe; MPA / TU Darmstadt
Dr. rer. nat C. Lehmann; DAP GmbH, Berlin
Dipl.-Ing. J. Triebel; LMPA Sachsen-Anhalt, Magdeburg
Table of contents

Page

1 Introduction 3

2 Programme 3

2.1 Test procedure 3

2.2 Participants 4

2.3 Homogeneity testing 5

3 Statistical design 6

3.1 Determination of assigned values and calculation of 6

performance statistics

4 Results 8

4.1 Testing at room temperature 8

4.2 Testing at -20°C 9

4.3 Specimen geometry 10

4.4 Determination of measurement uncertainty 14

5 Summary 16

6 Bibliography 18

7 Directory of the participants 19

Appendix A

2
1 Introduction

In 2004, the Institut für Eignungsprüfung (IfEP) organised a proficiency test Charpy Impact
Test at room temperature (RT) and at -20°C (CIT 2004). The participation in this proficiency
test was open to accredited and not accredited laboratories from all over Europe.
This proficiency test contributes to the development of a system which offers regularly
proficiency tests to the laboratories, to make a continuous monitoring of their technical
competence possible.
The inspection was carried out by Prof. Dr.–Ing. Holger Frenz.
During the last years the determination of measurement uncertainty became an important
topic in testing laboratories. The organiser present to the participants a general survey of the
currently model for calculation of the measurement uncertainty in Charpy Impact Testing.

2 Programme
2.1 Test procedure
This proficiency test is based on the test standard EN 10045-1: [1] and was designed
according to ISO Guide 43-1 [2].
The participants received steel material with the dimension of 130 x 60 x 16 mm and should
machine up to ten Charpy test pieces with V-notch according to the specifications given in
table 2 of EN 10045 1:1999 [1].
The participants should determine the absorbed energy of the material at room temperature
and / or -20°C.
Additionally, the laboratories were asked to measure the dimensions of the specimens and
should state the compliance of these specimens with the test standards.

3
2.2 Participants
80 laboratories located in 24 different countries (Table 1) participated in this proficiency
test, 79 of them stated results.
74 were accredited based on EN ISO/IEC 17025 [3].

Table 1: Participants coming from the following countries

Austria 2 Finland 3 Poland 1
Belgium 4 Germany 39 Portugal 2
Bulgaria 1 Greece 2 Romania 1
Croatia 1 Hungary 1 Slovakia 3
Czech Republic 3 Ireland 1 Slovenia 1
Denmark 1 Italy 4 Sweden 2
Estonia 1 Mexico 1 Switzerland 2
France 1 Norway 1 Turkey 2

Information about the laboratories were given by themselves, they are summarised in Table 2.

Table 2: Information on laboratories

Number of personnel
1 to 4 5 to 8 9 to 12 more than 13
Participants 5 20 11 43
Branch (multiple statements possible)
Inspection Private Industry State Others
body laboratory Institute
Participants 8 34 24 9 5

4
2.3 Homogeneity testing
Homogeneity testing was carried out by an accredited laboratory. 100 Charpy V test pieces
(same raw material as in the proficiency test) were machined according to ISO 148-3 [4]. The
specimens were tested at room temperature and at -20°C according to EN 10045-1 [1]. The
statistical evaluation followed ISO/DIS 13528:2002 [5]. Additionally, the geometrical
characteristics of control samples were verified by the Materialprüfungsanstalt NRW. Table 3
shows the permissible limit and the achieved limits when testing the material used in this
Proficiency Test.

Table 3: Results of homogeneity testing

Max. permissible
Energy level of the Result Homogeneity
standard deviation
specimens Testing
ISO 148-3 Table 4
< 40 J (-20° C) ≤ 2,0 J 0,88 J
≤ 5 % of average 0,97 %
≥ 40 J (RT)
absorbed energy (0,50 J)

The comparison of column 2 and 3 of table 3 shows that the requirements of ISO 148-3 are
clearly met by the material used. The material is therefore suitable for the Proficiency Test
Charpy Impact Test 2004.

5
3 Statistical Design
The statistical method used for the evaluation of this proficiency test is based on
ISO/DIS 13528 [5], ISO/IEC Guide 43-1 [2] and EN 10045-2 [6]. The criteria for the
laboratory assessment were the error (AB) of laboratories’ mean value MWLAB against the
assigned value X und the repeatability (WB) within the laboratory.

3.1 Determination of assigned values and calculation of performance

statistics
The assigned value X is determined as a consensus value of the results of all participating
laboratories. It is calculated as a robust mean value. For each test parameter an assigned value
was calculated.
The criterions are: Error (AB) of the testing machine and repeatability (WB) of the testing
machine
The error (AB) characterises the difference of the laboratory mean value from the assigned
value X (equation 1).
AB = MWLAB − X (1)

The repeatability (WB) is calculated according to equation 2.

WB = MAX LAB − MIN LAB (2)

The permissible limits according to EN 10045-2 [6] are stated in table 4.

Table 4: Comparison of the limits acc. to EN 10045-2 [6] and limits chosen by the
organiser.

Test
Repeatability (WB) Error (AB)
temperature

EN 10045-2 used for EN 10045-2 used for

Table 3 evaluation Table 3 evaluation

- 20°C (< 40 J) ≤6J ≤6J ≤4J ≤4J

RT (≥ 40 J) ≤ 15 % of X ≤ 15 % of X ≤ 10 % of X ≤ 15 % of X

6
EN 10045-2 [6] states in table 3 a maximum permissible error of 10 % from the assigned
value X. When testing at room temperature this would be in this proficiency test 4,8 J.
Deviating from this the organiser uses a maximum permissible error at room temperature of
15 %. This takes into account the influence of test piece machining.
Table 5, row 1 and 2 gives a review of the respective assigned values X and the permissible
limits. The respective thresholds can be taken from table 5.

Table 5: Compilation of assigned values X and the permissible limits of the

proficiency test
Absorbed energy Absorbed energy
Test parameter KV in J KV in J
RT -20°C
X 47,9 19,7
lower limit 40,7 15,7
upper limit 55,1 23,7

7
4 Results
The results of this proficiency test are summarised in table 6 to 9 and graphically presented in
appendix A.

4.1 Testing at room temperature

79 laboratories reported results. Laboratories listed in table 6 are outside the limits of
permissible error chosen by the organiser. Laboratories listed in table 7 achieved a result
outside the limits of repeatability according to EN 10045-2 [6].
The results of this task are graphically presented in figures A1 to A7, appendix A.

Table 6: Testing at room temperature: Error from assigned value 47,9 J;

laboratories with unsatisfactory results
Lab.-No.: Permissible error:
15%
in J in %
4 -17,5 -36,5
26 -8,6 -18,1
32 -8,1 -16,8
34 9,4 19,5
46 -7,6 -15,8
60 9,4 19,5
62 7,6 15,9
103 -12,9 -26,9
105 13,9 29,1
116 -7,5 -15,6
124 13,2 27,5
128 9,1 19,0

Table 7: Testing at room temperature:

Laboratories outside the limits of repeatability
Lab.-No.: Permissible repeatability:
15%
in J in %
12 7,5 15,6
42 7,5 15,6
47 13,0 27,1
108 9,0 18,8

8
4.2 Testing at -20°C
74 laboratories reported results. Laboratories listed in table 8 are outside the limits of
permissible error according to EN 10045-2 [6]. Laboratories listed in table 9 achieved a result
outside the limits of repeatability according to EN 10045-2 [6].
The results of this task are graphically presented in figures A8 to A14, appendix A.
Table 8: Testing at -20°C: Error from assigned value 19,7 J;
Laboratories with unsatisfactory results
Lab.-No.: Permissible error:
4J
4 -6,1
12 4,7
26 -6,9
109 7,1
132 5,6

Table 9: Testing at -20°C: Laboratories outside the limits of repeatability

Lab.-No.: Permissible repeatability:
15%
128 6,2

9
4.3 Specimen geometry

In the context of this proficiency test the laboratories were ask to state the conformity of
their specimens according to EN 10045-1, table 2 [1]. 76 laboratories state that their
specimen are in compliance to EN 10045-1, table 2 [1]. Three laboratories reported that they
machined specimen according to other specifications. Table 10 summarises participants
Declaration of conformity according to EN 10045-1, table 2 [1] and the Results of the
measurement made by the laboratory.
Column “Measurement Lab” shows the values reported by the laboratories which are not
according to the standard based on their statement. They refer to the in the task prompted
specimen dimensions.
(1) Length
(2) Height
(3) Width
(4) Angle of notch
(5) Height below notch
(6) Radius of curvature at base of notch
(7) Distance of plane of symmetry of notch from ends of test piece
(8) Angle between plane of symmetry of notch and longitudinal axis of test piece
(9) Angle between adjacent longitudinal faces of test piece

Results in column “Measurement Lab” marked with [ ], show that the laboratory has made
no measurement or made a statement like “o.k.”, but did not report a value. In practice often
templates are used to check the overall dimensions of the specimen.

10
Table 10: Laboratory’s measurement of specimens; results
In compliance with Measurement
Lab.-No.: test standard Lab.
Yes No
2 X
3 X
4 X (3)
5 X
6 X
7 X
8 X
10 X
11 X
12 X
14 X
17 X
19 X
20 X
21 X
22 X
23 X [6] [8] [9]
24 X
26 X [5] [6]
28 X
32 X
33 X
34 X
40 X
41 X

11
Table 10: Laboratory’s measurement of specimens; results (continued)
In compliance with Measurement
Lab.-No.: test standard Lab.
Yes No
42 X [8] [9]
43 X (6)
44 X (6)
46 X
47 X
49 X [8] [9]
51 X
56 X
57 X
58 X
59 X (5)
60 X
61 X
62 X (6)
63 X [9]
66 X
70 X
72 X [7] [8] [9]
75 X
76 X
77 X
79 X
89 X
90 X
91 X
92 X (2)
93 X [6]
95 X
96 X
98 X

12
Table 10: Laboratory’s measurement of specimens; results (continued)
In compliance with Measurement
Lab.-No.: test standard Lab.
Yes No
101 X (5)
X [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]
103
[9]
105 X (2) (4)
106 X
108 X
109 X
115 X [4] [6]
116 X
120 X
121 X
122 X
124 X
125 X (2)
126 X (4)
127 X
128 X
129 X (2) (5)
131 X
132 X [5]
142 X
143 X
144 X
145 X (5) (6) [8] [9]
516 X [6]

13
4.4 Determination of Measurement Uncertainty

In the Proficiency Test „Charpy Impact Test 2004“ the Measurement Uncertainty of the
Charpy Pendulum was determined according to the German proposal of annex A of
ISO DIS 148-1 [7]. This proposal is based on UNCERT Code of Practice No. 06 [8]. The
shown formulae are under consideration and present the state of the art of Measurement
Uncertainty calculation in Charpy Impact Testing. It must be pointed out that in the
standardisation process the formulae can be enhanced or changed.
The expanded Measurement Uncertainty of the indirect verification of the Charpy Impact
Pendulum (PSW) UPSW can be calculated according to equation (3):

U PSW = 2 * u CVR
2
+ u 2x CVR + u 2r (3)
with:
uCVR Uncertainty of Charpy-Reference Test Piece
uxCVR Uncertainty of Impact Pendulum when testing Reference Test Pieces
ur Uncertainty of the smallest measurement step of the PSW
2 Coverage Factor k, for a confidence level of nearly 95 %

Chapter 2.3 shows that the material used in this Proficiency Test meets the requirements of
ISO 148-3 [4]. Therefore the Uncertainty of the Impact Pendulum when testing Reference
Test Pieces, uxCVR was calculated from the laboratory results. The smallest measurement
step was set to 1 J for all participants. The results of the estimation of the expanded
Measurement Uncertainty of the Charpy Impact Pendulum are shown in figure A15, annex
A. The expanded Measurement Uncertainty at -20°C is shown in figure A16, annex A.

14
The combined expanded Measurement Uncertainty of a test serial UCPM can be calculated
by the testing laboratory using equation (4). The uncertainty uxCVTP includes uncertainties of
the homogeneity of the material, uncertainties of the dimensions, and uncertainties of the
test procedure. This uncertainty factor is combined with the uncertainty of the testing
machine uPSW calculated using equation (3). Before using equation (4) the calculated UPSW
must be divided by coverage factor k = 2.

U CPM = 2 u 2PSW + u 2x CVPT (4)

with:
uPSW Uncertainty of the Charpy Impact Pendulum with k = 1
uxCVTP Uncertainty caused by inhomogeneity of test pieces (ISO DIS 148-1 [7])
2 Coverage Factor k, for a confidence level of nearly 95 %

15
5 Summary
The criterion for the assessment of results of the proficiency test Charpy Impact Test,
CIT 2004 was “error from the assigned value” and “repeatability” on basis of
EN 10045-2 [6].
Table 11 gives an overview of the satisfactory results.

Table 11: Final score of proficiency test CIT 2004

No. of satisfactory results
participants
Error at room temperature 79 85 %
Error at -20°C 74 93 %
Repeatability at room temperature 79 95 %
Repeatability at -20°C 74 99 %

Laboratories listed in table 12 achieved at least one non-satisfactory result.

There is no over-all assessment for this proficiency test; each result is assessed on its own.
Laboratories not listed in table 12 achieved a satisfactory result for all of their results.

16
Table 12: Laboratories reporting at least one non-satisfactory result
Lab.-No. AB RT WB RT AB -20°C WB -20°C

4 X X
12 X X
26 X X
32 X
34 X
42 X
46 X
47 X
60 X
62 X
103 X
105 X
108 X
109 X
116 X
124 X
128 X X
132 X

AB RT / -20°C Error at room temperature / -20°C

WB RT / -20°C Repeatability at room temperature / -20°C
X Result unsatisfactory

17
6 Bibliography

[1] EN 10045-1:1991, Charpy impact test on metallic materials; part 1: test method.
Beuth Verlag, Berlin, April 1990.

[2] ISO/IEC Guide 43-1:1997, Proficiency Testing by Interlaboratory Comparisons.

International Organisation for Standardization, Genève, First Edition 1997.

[3] EN ISO/IEC 17025:2000, General requirements for the competence of testing and
calibration laboratories – trilingual version. Beuth Verlag, Berlin, April 2000.

[4] ISO 148-3:1998, Metallic materials - Charpy pendulum impact test - Part 3:
Preparation and characterization of Charpy V reference test pieces for verification of
test machines. Beuth Verlag, Berlin, Dec. 1998.

[5] ISO/DIS 13528-2002 (E): Statistical methods for use in proficiency testing by
interlaboratory comparisons. International Organisation for Standardization, Genève,
February 2002.

[6] EN 10045-2: 1993, Metallic materials; Charpy impact test; part 2: verification of the
testing machine (pendulum impact). Beuth Verlag, Berlin, Jan. 1993.

[7] ISO/DIS 148-1: 2003, Metallic materials - Charpy pendulum impact test - Part 1:
Test Method. Beuth Verlag, Berlin, August 2003.

[8] UNCERT COP 06: 2000 - Lont, M.A., Manual of Codes of Practice for the
Determination of Uncertainties in Mechanical Tests on Metallic Materials,
The Determination of Uncertainties in Charpy Impact Testing,
Project, No. SMT4-CT97-2165, Issue 1, September 2000.

18
7 Directory of participants
The participants are listed in alphabetical order. There is no relation between the code number
and the position on the following list. 12 of 79 participating laboratories did not want to be
named in this table.

AIB Vingotte International BE Vilvoorde

BAM DE Berlin
Bayer Technology Services GmbH DE Leverkusen
BHP Laboratories IE Limerick City
BK-Werkstofftechnik GmbH DE Bremen
Bodycote Materials Testing AS NO Sandnes
Böhler Edelstahl GmbH AT Kapfenberg
Butting GmbH & Co. KG DE Wittingen- Knesebeck
Bytest SRL IT Volpiano
Danish Technological Institute DK Aarhus C
Eurolab Garanzia Qualità S.r.l. IT Campogalliano
Framatome ANP GmbH DE Erlangen
GATS LTD GR Ionia Thessaloniki
Germanischer Lloyd Prüflabor GmbH DE Stuttgart
GMA - Werkstoffprüfung GmbH DE Düsseldorf
GMA - Werkstoffprüfung GmbH DE Dortmund
Hochschule für Angewandte Wissenschaften Hamburg DE Hamburg
IGH d.d. HR Zagreb
Ineti - Instituto Nacional De Engenharia PT Lisboa
E Technologia Industrial
L.B.I. FR Amneville
LVQ - WP Prüflabor GmbH DE Magdeburg
LVQ - WP Werkstoffprüfung GmbH DE Mülheim a. d. Ruhr
Mannesmannröhren Mülheim GmbH DE Mülheim
Materialprüfungsanstalt Universität Stuttgart DE Stuttgart
Met Lab OY FI Tampere
Mirtec SA. GR Volos
19
MTT Werkstofflabor GmbH DE Herne
Multitest LTD BG Varna
NMBS BE Brüssel
NORDTEST Prüfgesellschaft mbH DE Rostock
NUTECH GmbH DE Neumünster
QUALITEST LAB. LTD HU Dunaujvaros
Rautaruukki Steel FI Raahe
RUAG Land Systems CH Thun
Saarstahl AG DE Völklingen
Safe Control Materialteknik AB SE Göteborg
Salzgitter Flachstahl GmbH DE Salzgitter
SGS F.H. Gottfeld GmbH DE Herne
Sider Test SRL IT Castel San Giovanni
Siemens Power Generation, Gasturbinenwerk Berlin DE Berlin
Skoda Vyzkum s.r.o. CZ Plzen
Slovenian National Building and Civil Engineering Institute SI Ljubljana
SLV München Niederlassung der GSI mbH DE München
SSAB Tunnplat AB SE Borlänge
Studio Tecnico "Mario Cuzzolin SRL" IT Mogliano Veneto
Tallinn Technical University of Materials Technology EE Tallinn
TPW Werkstoffprüfung GmbH DE Neuss
TÜRK STANDARDLARI ENSTÝTÜSÜ TR Çiðli - ÝZMÝR
Ýzmir Bölge Müdürlüðü
Turkish Standards Institution TR Gebze Kocaeli
TÜV Hannover / S.A. e.V. DE Hannover
TÜV Industrie Service GmbH DE München
TÜV Industrie Service GmbH DE Mannheim
TÜV Industrie Service GmbH DE Leipzig
TÜV Nord e.V. DE Hamburg
U.S. Steel Kosice - Labortest s.r.o. SK Kosice
UDT - Urzad Dozoru Technicznego PL Poznan
Uzina Constructoare de Masini RESITA S.A. RO Resita
Vitkovice - testing and Laboratories, Ltd CZ Ostrava-Vitkovice
20
Voestalpine Krems GmbH AT Krems/Donau
Volkswagen AG DE Wolfsburg
VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland FI VTT
Vyskumny Ustav Dopravny, a.s. SK Zilina
Welding Research Institute - Industrials Institute SR SK Bratislava
Werkstoff Technik Labor (WTL) DE Aalen
WTCM Gent BE Gent - Zwynaarde
Zentrallabor GmbH Leipzig DE Leipzig
ZWP - Werkstoffprüfung Peters GmbH u. Co. KG DE Duisburg

21
-intentionally left blank-

22
 Appendix A

Content Figures Page

Testing at room temperature;

A1 to A3 A1
mean values of the Laboratories

Testing at room temperature;

A4 A4
standard deviation of all Laboratories

Testing at room temperature;

A5 to A7 A5
range of the results

Testing at -20°C;
A8 to A10 A8
mean values of the Laboratories

Testing at -20°C;
A11 A11
standard deviation of all Laboratories

Testing at -20°C;
A12 to A14 A-12
range of the results

Measurement Uncertainty of the Charpy Impact Pendulum

A15 A15
at room temperature

Measurement Uncertainty of the Charpy Impact Pendulum

A16 A16
at -20°C

23
 65,0
Schlagarbeit in J bei RT / Impact energy in J at RT

60,0
zulässige Abweichung
permissible error
55,0

50,0 Median

45,0

40,0 zulässige Abweichung

permissible error

35,0

30,0

25,0
4
103
26
32
46
116
76
51
79
17
98
108
129
58
49
516
5
44
59
90
91
28
95
20
93
115
3
89
127
144
6
72
143
21
8
56
11
2
122
77
63
142
66
57
131
41
43
42
106
19
125
145
70
14
109
61
24
96
132
101
22
75
7
92
33
121
40
120
47
23
10
126
12
62
128
34
60
124
105
Labor-Nr. / Laboratory Code
Bild / Figure A1: Raumtemperatur; Mittelwerte aller Laboratorien / Room temperature; mean values of all laboratories

A1
 65,0
Schlagarbeit in J bei RT / Impact energy in J at RT

60,0
zulässige Abweichung
permissible error
55,0

50,0
Median

45,0

40,0
zulässige Abweichung
permissible error

35,0

30,0

25,0
2

10

11

12

14

17

19

20

21

22

23

24

26

28

32

33

34

40

41

42

43

44

46

47

49

51

56

57

58

59

60

61

62
Labor-Nr. / Laboratory Code
Bild / Figure A2: Raumtemperatur; Mittelwerte der Laboratorien 2 bis 62 / Room temperature; mean values of laboratories 2 to 62

A2
 65,0
Schlagarbeit in J bei RT / Impact energy in J at RT

60,0
zulässige Abweichung
permissible error
55,0

50,0

Median
45,0

40,0
zulässige Abweichung
permissible error

35,0

30,0

25,0
63
66

70
72
75

76
77
79
89

90
91
92
93

95
96
98

101
103
105
106

108
109
115
116

120
121
122

124
125
126
127

128
129
131
132

142
143
144

145
516
Labor-Nr. / Laboratory Code
Bild / Figure A3: Raumtemperatur; Mittelwerte der Laboratorien 63 bis 516 /
Room temperature; mean values of laboratories 81 to 516

A3
 Standardabweichung in J bei RT /
Standard Deviation in J at RT

Bild / Figure A4:

0,0
1,0
2,0
3,0
4,0
5,0
6,0

41
70
8
33
32

Median
49
59
91
103
132
144
109
5
19
6
516
11
2
66
101
128
145
93
77
51
40
7
126
60
4
98
106
57
61
14
20
63
22
116
79
129
95
124
62
72
26
21
105
96
120
23
Labor-Nr. / Laboratory Code

76
3
127
46
17
122
125
115
28
131
89
10
56
58
143
75
121
44
43
92
142
24
90
12
34
42
108
47
Raumtemperatur; Standardabweichung aller Laboratorien / Room temperature; Standard deviation of all laboratories

A4
 Spannweite in J bei RT / Range in J at RT

0,0
2,0
4,0
6,0
8,0
10,0
12,0
14,0

Bild / Figure A5:

70
41
32
49
8
33
91
59
144
128
5
19
66
11
126
101
2
permissible repeatability

6
zulässige Wiederholbarkeit

109
60
103
516
132
145
93
7
51
77
40
61
106
4
116
14
22
24
57
98
62
95
105
20
26
72
21
124
79
34
63
129
120
Labor-Nr. / Laboratory Code

23
96
46
10
17
28
76
89
3
58
Raumtemperatur; Spannweite der Einzelwerte / Room temperature; Range of results

125
127
56
92
115
121
75
122
143
131
43
90
44
142
12
42
108
47
A5
 14,0

12,0
Spannweite in J bei RT / Range in J at RT

10,0

8,0 zulässige Wiederholbarkeit

permissible repeatability

6,0

4,0

2,0

0,0
2

10

11

12

14

17

19

20

21

22

23

24

26

28

32

33

34

40

41

42

43

44

46

47

49

51

56

57

58

59

60

61

62
Labor-Nr. / Laboratory Code
Bild / Figure A6: Raumtemperatur; Spannweite der Einzelwerte Laboratorien 2 bis 62 /
Room temperature; range of results laboratories 2 to 62

A6
 14,0
Spannweite in J bei RT / Range in J at RT

12,0

10,0

8,0 zulässige Wiederholbarkeit

permissible repeatability

6,0

4,0

2,0

0,0
63
66

70
72
75

76
77
79
89

90
91
92
93

95
96
98

101
103
105
106

108
109
115
116

120
121
122

124
125
126
127

128
129
131
132

142
143
144

145
516
Labor-Nr. / Laboratory Code
Bild / Figure A7: Raumtemperatur; Spannweite der Einzelwerte Laboratorien 63 bis 516 /
Room temperature; range of results laboratories 63 to 516

A7
 30,0

28,0

26,0
zulässige Abweichung
Schlagarbeit in J bei -20°C /
Impact energy in J at -20°C

permissible error
24,0

22,0

Median
20,0

18,0

16,0
zulässige Abweichung
permissible error
14,0

12,0

10,0
26
4
115
42
142
129
62
76
145
6
98
5
103
28
79
46
89
516
43
91
61
70
128
131
11
51
49
41
101
63
108
56
143
17
24
60
120
34
8
93
144
106
19
116
58
72
21
125
122
127
90
77
22
33
14
40
124
23
75
7
44
20
126
92
3
57
121
47
96
2
59
12
132
109
Labor-Nr. / Laboratory Code
Bild / Figure A8: -20°C; Mittelwerte aller Laboratorien / -20°C; mean values of all laboratories

A8
 30,0

28,0

26,0
zulässige Abweichung
Schlagarbeit in J bei -20°C /
Impact energy in J at -20°C

permissible error
24,0

22,0

Median
20,0

18,0

16,0
zulässigeAbweichung
permissible error
14,0

12,0

10,0
2

11

12

14

17

19

20

21

22

23

24

26

28

33

34

40

41

42

43

44

46

47

49

51

56

57

58

59

60

61

62
Labor-Nr. / Laboratory Code
Bild / Figure A9: -20°C; Mittelwerte der Laboratorien 2 bis 62 / -20°C; mean values of laboratories 2 to 62

A9
 30,0

28,0

26,0
zulässige Abweichung
Schlagarbeit in J bei -20°C /
Impact energy in J at -20°C

permissible error
24,0

22,0

Median
20,0

18,0

16,0
zulässige Abweichung
14,0 permissible error

12,0

10,0
63

70

72

75

76

77

79

89

90

91

92

93

96

98

101

103

106

108

109

115

116

120

121

122

124

125

126

127

128

129

131

132

142

143

144

145

516
Labor-Nr. / Laboratory Code
Bild / Figure A10: -20°C; Mittelwerte der Laboratorien 63 bis 516 / -20°C; mean values of laboratories 63 to 516

A10
 Standardabweichung in J bei -20°C /
Standard Deviation in J at -20°C

Bild / Figure A11:

0,0
0,5
1,0
1,5
2,0
2,5
3,0
3,5

79
58
122
127
23

Median
98
142
12
49
19
90
22
124
4
5
43
101
63
131
33
89
75
8
42
93
59
115
76
28
11
92
121
145
34
56
62
129
61
116
20
126
57
2
24
109
103
60
41
Labor-Nr. / Laboratory Code

106
91
516
143
40
70
44
3
108
17
47
7
51
14
-20°C; Standardabweichung aller Laboratorien / -20°C; Standard deviation of all laboratories

46
144
96
120
72
125
6
21
26
77
132
128
A11
 Spannweite in J bei -20°C / Range in J at -20°C

0,0
1,0
2,0
3,0
4,0
5,0
6,0
7,0

Bild / Figure A12:

58
79
122
127
23
142
12
98
4
5
8
19
22
24
43
49
permissible repeatability

63
zulässige Wiederholbarkeit

75
89
90
101
124
131
33
42
93
145
59
62
2
11
20
28
34
41
56
57
60
61
70
76

-20°C; Spannweite der Einzelwerte / -20°C; Range of results

92
103
106
109
115
116
Labor-Nr. / Laboratory Code

121
126
129
143
516
7
91
40
3
14
17
44
47
108
125
144
46
96
120
51
6
21
26
72
77
132
128
A12
 7,0

zulässige Wiederholbarkeit
Spannweite in J bei -20°C / Range in J at -20°C
permissible repeatability
6,0

5,0

4,0

3,0

2,0

1,0

0,0
2

11

12

14

17

19

20

21

22

23

24

26

28

33

34

40

41

42

43

44

46

47

49

51

56

57

58

59

60

61

62
Labor-Nr. / Laboratory Code
Bild / Figure A13: -20°C; Spannweite der Einzelwerte Laboratorien 2 bis 62 / -20°C; range of results laboratories 2 to 62

A13
 7,0

zulässige Wiederholbarkeit
Spannweite in J bei -20°C / Range in J at -20°C
permissible repeatability
6,0

5,0

4,0

3,0

2,0

1,0

0,0
63

70

72

75

76

77

79

89

90

91

92

93

96

98

101

103

106

108

109

115

116

120

121

122

124

125

126

127

128

129

131

132

142

143

144

145

516
Labor-Nr. / Laboratory Code
Bild / Figure A14: -20°C; Spannweite der Einzelwerte Laboratorien 63 bis 516 / -20°C; range of results laboratories 63 to 516

A14
 Messunsicherheit der Prüfmaschine bei RT in J/
Measurement Uncertainty oftesting machine at RT in J

0,0
1,0
2,0
3,0
4,0
5,0
6,0
7,0

70
41
8

Bild / Figure A15:

33
32
59
91
103
132
144
5
19
49
66
11
101
2
516
145
109
93
77
6
51
40
7
126
60
4
106
98
61
57
128
20
63
116
79
129
95
124
62
26
14
21
105
96
22
76
72
24
Labor-Nr. / Laboratory Code

120
23
127
46
17
125
122
115
Relative erweiterte Messunsicherheit der Prüfmaschine bei Raumtemperatur/

131
10
89
3
56
58
75
143
Relative expanded Measurement Uncertainty of the testing machine at room temperature

121
28
43
44
142
90
12
92
34
42
108
47
A15
 Messunsicherheit der Prüfmaschine bei -20°C in J/
Measurement Uncertainty of testing machine bei -20°C in J

0,0
1,0
2,0
3,0
4,0
5,0
6,0

58
79

Bild / Figure A16:

122
127
23
98
142
12
19
49
90
22
24
124
5
4
43
101
63
131
33
89
75
93
59
28
76
92
11
115
121
145
34
42
56
62
61
116
129
20
126
2
57
8
60
103
91
Labor-Nr. / Laboratory Code

40
Relative erweiterte Messunsicherheit der Prüfmaschine bei -20°C/
109
70
106
41
3
44
17
Relative expanded Measurement Uncertainty of the testing machine at -20°C

108
516
143
47
7
51
46
144
96
120
72
6
14
21
125
26
77
132
128
A16