Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
2 1
Nina Chipman
Regent University
PORTFOLIO ASSIGMENT NO. 2 2
For the Assignment No. 2 for the ePortfolio, I chose to create a Kahoot. The information
being tested in my Kahoot was derived from Standard 8.5 of the English Standards of Learning
Curriculum Framework (2010) for Grade Eight (Virginia Department of Education, pp. 10-14).
This standard focuses on the student’s knowledge of “literary form and its characteristics”
I personally chose Kahoot because I have seen how effective this tool can be in creating
excitement in the classroom. I’ve seen kids in elementary schools and even high schools being
actively engaged and truly learning with this resource. It’s easy to use and share. With more
schools moving towards a 1:1 technology policy, Kahoot is a viable option. Once the teacher has
either found a ready-made quiz or chooses to make her own, she must press play to begin the
quiz. Then the option to play either classic or team will pop up. I always choose classic because
this allows each student to play and test their knowledge individually. If this Kahoot quiz is
being used as a sort of pre-assessment or review before a test, it’s important for each student to
test their own knowledge. A game pin is needed so that each student can enter this pin and join
the game. The teacher doesn’t have to choose the game pin, Kahoot makes this pin
automatically. Once all the students have joined on their devices, the game can start. There’s an
option when creating the game to make it run automatically so that the teacher doesn’t have to
pause after each question. However, if the teacher would like she can allow for these pauses in
order to reflect after each question and provide clarity for students who missed the question.
PORTFOLIO ASSIGMENT NO. 2 3
The game pin “797514” is displayed above. This preview of the game allows for a simulated device/student to enter
the game pin and play. In the device above, I have already entered both the pin and my name. I’m waiting for the
Now that the game has commenced, the device to the right shows how the student can interact with Kahoot. The
question relates to some of the vocabulary from Standard 8.5 (Virginia Department of Education, 2010, p. 10). The
PORTFOLIO ASSIGMENT NO. 2 4
student can choose the correct answer by tapping the colored shape that corresponds with the correct answer on the
This is the final screen in the game. I was the only one playing and the one who made the quiz, so I won. Usually
when there are more students playing, the top three have their names appear on the podiums. I would most likely
give a piece of candy or some other reward to the top three. By rewarding the students, this gives an incentive to all
the students to be engaged and try their hardest during this activity.
Overall, I found Kahoot to be easy to use and effective. The only downside I’d see to this
application would be the need for individual devices. In a classroom where not every child has
access to a computer or iPad, this application doesn’t serve each student as well. However, if
Kahoot is play in “team” mode, then less devices are needed. I enjoyed the background music to
the game because it creates a level of excitement. The sound effects make the game very
dramatic. I could see myself using this resource to review before a quiz. Or even using this as a
reward at the end of class as an exit ticket. I think that the GettyImages provided in making the
Kahoot were very useful, but next time I think I’ll use my own images that more closely relate to
the question. Again, I think that Kahoot is easy to use, but next time I think I’ll search more into
PORTFOLIO ASSIGMENT NO. 2 5
the ready-made Kahoots to see whether or not any of them cover SOLs that relate to my own.
a317-a5bfcd4cb9b2
I did, however, attempt to familiarize myself with two other web-based applications.
Both “Plickers” and “Nearpod” had different pros and cons to them, and these pros and cons
One of the major cons to Plickers that I saw was the fact that it’s not completely web
based. One of the major components of game play relies on the teacher printing out playing cards
for the students. These cards have a sort of QR code on the back of them with the question and
multiple choice answers on the back. Although I think that having a physical component can
make this game play more interactive, and cater to a classroom that has less access to devices,
this web-based application didn’t fit my needs or goals. I wanted to have a game that is easy to
play with little set up for a quick review with the class. I think that Plickers would take just a
little bit more time to set up. I liked that Kahoot made the gameplay intense with the background
music and timer, and that the students could see the results quickly on both the main screen and
their own devices. I could see Plickers being used to teach the kids rather than review. Plickers
allows the teacher to save the data and see where students are missing the concepts. A
spreadsheet of student answers can be printed out, so I think that Plickers is good for more of a
Just as I thought that Plickers could be used more to teach and get a view of where
students are at with a concept, I thought that Nearpod leaned even more so towards teaching
rather than reviewing. Whereas Kahoot is great for reviewing concept that are already known,
Nearpod allows the teacher to interact more with the students and provide video, audio, and
PORTFOLIO ASSIGMENT NO. 2 6
drawings for the students to view together in real time. These are basically PowerPoint slides
where the students access the slides that the teacher is on through choosing “Live Lesson.” The
teacher can respond to student questions, highlight certain slides, and move the lesson forward. I
think that using Nearpod would be good for class time to get the student actively engaged and
following along with the teacher. Like Kahoot, the students join the Live Lesson through
entering both their name and the pin on their personal devices. I like that the presentation allows
for many different types of media within one presentation. The teacher can have the class answer
questions in an assessment, read a slide while she speaks, or even watch a video together.
Whenever the teacher progresses in the presentation, the student’s screen progresses as well. I
References
Virginia Department of Education, Curriculum Framework,. (2010). English Standards of
Learning. Richmond, Virginia: Board of Education, Virginia Commonwealth.