‘the Mythology (pia Dy pkey Bios of Sri ont roel Duda art tn nda, ng oe Pesan TRINITARIANISM, — See uai008 ORDERS (Christian). ‘Taxrry, Re TRINITY.—1. ,The term and ‘The term * covtesponding Crock ter Wiad" (pdt) appears iy The Chetan (a) ‘the 8 or Ottis cepa Pameguiaane atmociatd, if loopy ean of humanity aa th ‘sa the Great Mediam, and Fetish. character to the Crist- nity in ita close amosiation with the distinctive Christian view of divine in- carnation, In other religions and religious philo- sophies we moct with the {dee of divine incarnation, ‘bat it may be claimed that nowhere is the union of God and man so concrete and definite, and so uni- verml in ita import, as in the Christian religion. As Augustine said," if in the books of the Platon: inte it was to bo found that “in the boginning was 14, 8 Farcaer, Religie Lireare & Ine, Oct, B ors | thi ‘Trinity’ (from Lat. Irian pear te 1 meee at 5 alowed, howeves! tat the OT tad The Wiodom of God ace gS Sa eee ee epians Sco cas Ne an are fem ye ok ‘Trinity im anything lke it devel. et is the Peale and Johannine wtnene in borne to te the doetine three Son, and reflects the ‘Chareb, and in which the ‘re’ already “all. three Tt la alsa to bo toon in the of the Lord Jona Cust, and the fod, and the commasion of tho Holy Ghowt” Thar leat hes Soon called, and juaty so, the great Trinitarian tart of the NT, aa being one of She fow NT and the earliest of them, in which the tree ania of the Trinity are act alongaide of each ‘ther in'esiagle sentatives “Ifthe to formulated expression of the ‘rinity, tp sled ee thd ha’sume of the Holy Bist could te employed ac oe oe god tloae of te Hel Spice olds epploredivi ‘and ‘from the. the ‘Trinity of | through the Son. (5) The doctrine of the double the Trinity of dogma the theological | procession from the Father and the Son (the alement tends to lows touch with the gracious | jltoqe clans, added io the Nienno- Constantine. ‘of, the historical Christ. "In the Niowno- | Politan Creed on canonically indefensible, ) doctrine which representa the ditference between Western orthodoxy and Eastern (with its ‘connexion with | view of procession as from the Father alone, the fo [H 4a FEEE 2 Hae | Eee i ee i iif [a elit cd ne if ; | atin Soe sealasaies eel ee cereale oa Riau ae iat ce ed cre BS meine By buena aPicatatalel a abp ahs foe Son’ the Sptit an subordinate tthe Father ‘The Roman ( ian) theology found the Hts Aci ike Gel See Baca Sees es ev ee tect it it i Ky ra tee i ; ts ile i if all along on the lines of the Niowno-Constantino- EEE bd I0 eternally begotten of the Father: | te Ha Sealy ping tm ie Fbrcd ‘alas internally in ontsfagal an allan ott the ‘a0. shar ‘active in the threofold work, if with of function, Verily the dectrine of “tT speculative constractioa of the doctrine. jig) Altsongh the Gratian Charch toon came to ook upon the Trinity ax an incomprehensible mystery of revelation, which reason ‘might not ‘theologian felatlonship of love. It isnot pretended, however, ry the doatrine ofthe Triniey tional | pletely’ interpenetrating, are differentiated. a4 bl taal } ‘Bauman personality is ‘Tho result is ‘has indicated, we hear a ‘nowadays, even in non-Unitarian Christianity, wo. S, Wetbe ‘of * the Personality of God,’ whereas the historical doctrine tr that 2°“ Perwonlty ww God hia {tines the’ question, whether the Yate of Chriate uldeophil movement ot peronaiam or i, Se Rooewel of is old lance ith ‘Platoniam. Into {her also denuty isthe nature” Wine Teint vo within us is more than: ‘of the trath that in God ty i alge triane: Tf wo might ‘made Tel etaaly noite to ‘the unmade lose Trinity.» the Godhead bea Pereonality, ‘-must indeed be « unity, but, the anity-—like ‘unity of human ity—is composed of three Persons, which, - Ichough not self-existent bat it ‘each other mach the stress of their individual fune- Honing.” forsonality, whether in God or in