Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Strategic S U P P LY C H A I N M A N A G E M E N T
Leadership Program
Module
Procurement and Supply Management
C A N D I D AT E M A N U A L : S E L F - S T U D Y
Enhanced. Exceptional.
P u r c h a s i n g M a n a g e m e n t A s s o c i a t i o n o f C a n a d a
Module Two
Strategic Supply Chain Management Leadership Program Procurement and Supply Management
Module Two
Copyright © 2007 Purchasing Management Association of Canada. (Rel. 1) Revised October 2009.
No part of this material in this manual may be reproduced without the prior written consent of the
Purchasing Management Association of Canada. 777 Bay Street, Suite 2701, P.O. Box 112, Toronto,
Ontario M5G 2C8 Tel: (416) 977-7111 Fax: (416) 977-8886 Web Site: www.pmac.ca.
Use of this material is restricted to PMAC and its Provincial/Territorial Institutes for the express purpose of
delivering the Strategic Supply Chain Management Leadership Program. No other use is authorized, express
or implied. This material must be used in its entirety.
Table of Contents
Appendix: Fabritek, 1992 Sample Case and Report (see News section of community)
General Information
About the The Strategic Supply Chain Management Leadership Program is PMAC’s C.P.P.
Program Accreditation Program that has been redesigned and enhanced for 2007. This new
Program is competency based and takes an integrated approach, shifting the focus of
the profession from purchasing to strategic supply chain management in order to
meet the evolving needs of the marketplace.
The new C.P.P Accreditation Program is the most comprehensive program available
in Canada, balanced to deliver advanced supply chain management knowledge and
high-level business skills. The education component of the Program consists of eight
modules which cover the foundational knowledge of supply chain management and
six interactive workshops which address higher-level business skills.
Program As stated above, there are eight modules which will be delivered over a 36-month
Modules period. There are four modules that are 13 sessions in duration and four modules that
are seven sessions in duration. This is the second module of the Program –
Procurement and Supply Management, a 13-session module. Below is a listing of all
the modules so that candidates can see how they are progressing in the program and
what they have to look forward to in the coming months.
Module Title
13-Session Modules
1 Supply Chain Management
2 Procurement and Supply Management
3 Logistics and Transportation
4 Operations and Process Management
7-Session Modules
5 Knowledge Management
6 Global Sourcing
7 Supply Chain Management for the Public Sector
8 Supply Chain Management for Services, Capital Goods and Major Projects
Program PMAC’s philosophy for all of its modules and interactive workshops is that candidates
Philosophy learn by doing. Candidates who work thoroughly through the material to develop a
good understanding of concepts and principles presented, and complete all the assigned
readings, framework questions and assignments should have no trouble successfully
completing the Program.
Memorization of the materials is not as important as is:
• careful preparation
• being able to fully grasp the ideas and concepts presented, and
• knowing where to go for the appropriate reference material.
It is expected that candidates will be able to apply the appropriate concepts or
techniques to the correct problem or decision at the right time.
Schedule This module has twelve sessions and a final exam session.
Candidates will receive a session schedule upon enrollment in the module. The session
schedule includes the following information:
- Assignment due dates
- Assignment submission instructions
- Information on the final exam
- Information on marking
Candidates who have not received this information should contact their local provincial
or territorial institute.
Candidate In order to be successful in this module it is important for all candidates to do the
Responsibilities required work for each session. Candidates who do all the required work are prepared
for writing the case report in the module exam.
Many different assignments and learning activities are provided in this module in order
to increase and reinforce transfer of knowledge. To ensure success candidates are
expected to:
• Do all the required readings for each session prior to completing the assignments
• Read and prepare the assignments for submission, following the instructions provided
• Through assignments, contribute relevant and timely information that will enhance
learning
Module Overview
About this The focus of this module is on matters of strategic and tactical importance in
Module procurement. The module starts with a discussion of strategic and tactical procurement,
and goes on to consider key processes that support an organization’s strategic
procurement goals. A comprehensive procurement strategy backed up by solid
procurement tactics supports an organization’s goal of providing customers with highly
valued products. Specific tactical matters are considered along the way.
The sessions in this module are inter-related. Tactical and strategic purchasing delves
into procurement processes (session 2), which leads to an examination of relationships
and teams (session 4), and an exploration of the core competencies of the organization
including make or buy decisions (session 5), price and cost analysis (session 6), supplier
selection (session 8), and e-procurement (session 11). The cases examined in this
module further apply the concepts and tools learned throughout the module.
The module has a reading list with diverse but important topics. The articles provided
are often theoretical, and explain complex methodologies. It is important when reading
to focus on how the methodologies presented are applied. Avoid spending too much
time on the theories themselves. Focus on the introductions, management implications
and conclusions in the articles. Information gathered in readings can be applied to the
activities and case analyses.
• Develop and apply tactics that support procurement strategy including those
related to processes, organization, supplier selection and relationships, decision
making, and technology.
• Analyze, or direct others in the analysis of make or buy decisions, price, cost,
quality, inventory, and total cost of ownership.
Module and This module consists of thirteen sessions. Each session’s workload is equivalent to that
Session of a three-hour instructor-led class. The module objectives are covered in sessions one
Organization to twelve and the module ending examination is administered during session thirteen (a
four-hour exam). This self-study module contains the equivalent workload and content
as the instructor-led thirteen-week module.
Candidates will receive the following materials:
1. Candidate Manual (this manual): the guide for the module
2. Readings and Cases Manual: articles and cases for this module
3. Session Schedule: assignment due dates and instructions for submission
Each session of this manual will contain the following sections as required:
• Agenda – a guide to each session’s format and content
• What You Already Know - a brief statement linking information in the session to any
previous session (or to the candidate’s experience).
• Overview – a brief description of the contents of the session
• Objectives – a description of what candidates are expected to learn from the session
• Required Reading – reading assignments for the session
• Case Preparation – indicates the cases to be prepared for written reports
• Framework Questions – questions for framing each case analysis and report
• Exercises – instructions for preparing and submitting exercises
• Self-Assessment Activities – exercises to reinforce knowledge
• Session Notes – notes on the specific concepts or issues covered in the session
Learning Candidates will achieve learning in this module through the following learning
Activities activities:
• Readings
• Case study preparation
• Written case reports
• Exercises
• Self-assessment activities
Module Materials
Module Readings
Module The readings for this module are drawn from business, professional and academic
Readings publications. Each reading is assigned a letter which is used in the Session Schedule
and Reading Summary (see the following section) for your easy reference. They are as
follows:
A. Burt, Dobler and Starling (2003). World Class Supply Management, 7th edition,
McGraw-Hill Irwin, New York.
Module K. Stuart, F. Ian and Mueller, P. Jr. Total Quality Management and Supplier
Readings, Partnerships: A Case Study. International Journal of Purchasing and Materials
continued Management. Winter, 1994, Pages 14-20.
L. Genna, Albert. How do you find the right quality wavelength? Purchasing. Jan
16, 1997. Pages 45-46.
O. Cruz, Clarissa. Purchasing Pros Search for the Perfect Number of Suppliers.
Purchasing. July 11, 1996, Pages 28 and 29.
P. Carter, Phillip L., Monczka, Robert M., and Mosconi, Trish. Strategic
Performance Measurement for Purchasing and Supply. CAPS: Center for
Strategic Supply Research, 2005, Pages 10-27.
S. Park, Hong Y., Reddy, S., C. Shin, G.-C. and Eckerle, C., Impact of Supplier
Certification Program on U.S. Firms. European Journal of Purchasing and Supply
Management. Volume 2, 1996. Pages 107-118.
U. Ellram, Lisa M., Tate, Wendy L. and Billington, Carey. Understanding and
Managing the Services Supply Chain. Journal of Supply Management. Nov. 2004
Pages 17-32.
Z. Clark, Chris. Five Auction Steps. Purchasing. June 21, 2001. Pages 24 to 26.
AA. Manciagli, Dana. A Supplier’s View. Purchasing June 21, 2001. Page 26.
AB. Atkinson, William. IT Firm uses reverse auction for big contract labour buy.
Purchasing, December 22, 2000. Pages 97 to 99.
AC. Palmer. Richard J., Green, Leland D., and Ventura, Marie T. Are Corporate
Procurement Cards for You? Management Accounting. September 1996. Pages 22-
27.
AD. Carbone, James. To save more distribute more cards study says. Purchasing.
May 18, 2006. Page 29.
AF. Waller, M, Johnson, M.E., and Davis.D., Vendor Managed Inventory in Retail
Supply Chains, Journal of Business Logistics, #20, 1999. Page 183-187.
AG. Dixon, Lance. JIT II: A New Approach to Supply Management. Center for
Quality Management Journal. August 1992. Pages 15-19.
AH. Pragman, Claudia, H. JIT II: A Purchasing Concept For Reducing Lead
Times IN Time-Based Competition. Business Horizons. July-August 1996. Pages
54-58.
Module
Readings, Case Studies
continued
• Blozis Company. Purchasing Agents Association of Connecticut. Inc.
(Session 2)
• Placido Engine Company. Burt Dobler and Starling. World Class Supply
Management. (Session 7)
Supplementary These are a selection of additional references on business mathematics that candidates
Readings and may find useful. These are not required readings for the module. Note that Wikipedia
Websites provides information on various subjects. The web links below are suggested reading
if you feel you need to review business mathematics and accounting. Also provided
are some sites that describe some of the terminology and tools used in this module.
Introduction The table below provides a summary of all the readings, topics and activities in this
module for easy reference. A more detailed listing of the readings can be found on the
preceding pages.
Supplier Selection
• Sourcing: Finding Suppliers
• Weighted Evaluation Systems & Product Attribute Considerations
• Total Cost Approach
8 M, N, O
• Single versus Multiple Sourcing & The Perfect Number of Suppliers
• Individual exercise: (marked – 5%) Un-weighted Supplier
Evaluation Matrix: Platinum Box
• Individual Written Case Report: (marked – 5%) Platinum Box
Services Procurement
• Services are different
• Procurement involvement: Services are the same
• Services spend analysis
• Specification: Statements of Work & Service Level
10 U,V,W
Agreements
• Individual exercise: (marked – 5%) Services Spend Analysis
for Your Organization
• Individual exercise: (marked – 5%) Services Procurement –
Statement of Work
e-procurement
• Forms of e-procurement
• Pros and cons of e-procurement X,Y,Z,
11 • e-procurement knowledge areas / Implementing e-procurement AA, AB,
• Reverse auctions AC
• Individual Written Case Report: (marked – 10%) Boeing
Australia Limited
Candidate Evaluation
Mark The following table shows the allocation of marks for the different methods of
Allocation evaluation used in this module.
Individual
Exercises There are a total of seven marked exercises. These exercises are in various forms.
Generally, the exercises require candidates to apply the concepts and tools learned in
the session to their own organizations. Each of the marked exercises will be worth 5
percent of the candidate’s total mark.
Please see the Exercise section of each session for detailed exercise instructions.
Candidates are provided with a separate session schedule with assignment due dates
upon course enrolment. This schedule will indicate when each exercise is due.
1. Read the opening and closing paragraphs to identify issue(s) and challenges.
2. Examine tables and figures in the exhibits to determine what information is
useful in the decision-making process.
3. Examine the headings in the case to determine what information is available
for analysis.
4. Review the framework questions provided in each session of this module.
5. Read the first sentence of each paragraph, scanning for decisions made and
alternatives available.
6. Read closely, highlight issues, and make notes to gain a full understanding
of the case.
7. Decide what you would do if you were the decision maker in the case.
Written Case The six cases to be submitted as written case reports are:
Reports: an
Introduction 1. Blozis Company (session 2, worth 5%)
2. De Havilland Inc.: Applying Negotiation Analysis (session 3, worth 10%)
3. Make or Buy and Total Cost of Ownership: Happyland Construction
(session 5, worth 5%)
4. Frich Turbo Engine Co. & Price Analysis (session 6, worth 5%)
5. Platinum Box (session 8, worth 5%)
6. Boeing Australia Limited (session 11, worth 10%)
For specific instructions on each case, refer to the session in which the case report
occurs. Candidates will be evaluated on their ability to analyze and present information
according to the Written Case Report Guidelines (see next section).
When writing the paper connecting threads between thoughts must be present. For
example issues, analysis, recommendations and implementation must flow from each
other. Ideally all recommendation(s) will fall in line with the identified strategy. The
main recommendation(s) should be aimed at fixing the system not the symptoms.
The following section outlines the requirements for a case report. For further reference,
A sample case, Fabritek, 1992, and a sample case report marking sheet have been
provided in the Appendix for your reference. This case represents an example of how a
response will be graded by applying the marking structure, it’s is not a sample of a
model response.
Each of the cases present a procurement situation in which a decision must be made in a
particular context, and in light of a number of tradeoffs and alternatives. While there are
no right answers to a case, there are definite approaches that address the issues and
recognize the trade-offs involved.
For each of the cases there will be framework questions. These questions aid in
discovering the important aspects of the case, and guide the preparation of the written
case report. Candidates should be prepared to address these questions in the written
report itself. It is important for the candidate to adopt the role of decision maker, and to
address the real issues: "What should be done and why?", and “How do I plan to resolve
the situation?”
Candidates are provided with a separate session schedule with assignment due dates
upon course enrolment. This schedule will indicate when each case report is due.
Written Case The written case reports should follow these guidelines:
Reports
Audience: You will normally be writing your report to a specific person. Assume this
person is already familiar with the facts of the case. Do not simply repeat the facts.
Rather, use them, as required, to support your position.
Style: Your report must be typed and double spaced. It must have at least 2.5 cm
margins on all edges; and, it must be printed on white paper, complete with page
numbers. Write in complete sentences. Do not use point form, except when providing a
coherent list in a wider context. Resist the temptation to use too many new "tools" (e.g.,
clip art, colour printing). Black-on-white is all that is required.
Font: The minimum acceptable font is 12-point for the report and 10-point for exhibits.
Length: You are limited to a maximum of 1500 words; this does not include the title
page, executive summary, key assumptions, or exhibits. You may have a maximum of
three pages of exhibits.
Major Components: The major components of your report should contain all of the
elements associated with this structure but do not necessarily have to follow the exact
format :
Executive Summary
I. Process Elements
II. List of issues with impact analysis
III. Environmental and Root Cause Analysis
IV. Alternatives or Options
V. Recommendation(s) and Implementation
VI. Monitor and Control
VII. Judgement and Integration
VIII. Written Communication: Format, Language and Style
b. Exhibits and/or Appendixes (if applicable)
Title Page: This is a separate page that contains the name of the case, the module title,
your marker’s name, your name and candidate number, and the date you submitted the
report.
Executive Summary: This is on a separate page, along with any key assumptions you
have made. The executive summary is a short paragraph, consisting of your decision
and the major elements and implications of your action plan. Begin with "My decision is
to . . ." (You are required to make a decision to receive a mark for the report). The
reader should be able to read your executive summary and understand the direction to be
taken in implementing your decision. Do not outline background information or present
your analysis in this section.
Written Case Process Elements: Are all of the process elements in place? Does your response
Reports include all of the elements? A sample of the type of content that should be included
(continued) in this section is noted below and further detailed in the individual areas.
• Statement of Operating Environment (including assumptions)
• Statement of Strategic intention
• Issue Identification
• Analysis of issue
• Alternatives with Pro/Con analysis
• Decision criteria / desired outcome
• Recommendations
• Implementation
List of Issue(s) with Impact Analysis: As the decision maker in the case, explain
what you see as the main issue(s) to be addressed. Feel free to write in the first
person. Explain, with reference to the data of the case, why the issue is important
and/or sensitive. Demonstrate how the external and internal environments faced by
the organization influence the issue. Identify one main issue – or just a few issues –
not a long list of issues.
Written Case Recommendation and Implementation: Based on your analysis of the options,
Reports state what you would do (recommendation); then, outline the specific steps to be
(continued) taken (implementation). Your analysis has explained why you made the decision,
now provide the short- and long-term implementation details (who, what, where,
when, and how). Set priorities or a timeline for a specific action, where applicable.
Then, explain how you intend other stakeholders to buy into your decision; and how
you intend to deal with any negative consequences of your decision; and how you
intend to protect yourself from critical changes in the environment. The acid test is
this: could your action plan be implemented without further study? (For example, an
action plan is not complete if it recommends that a consultant or other expert
determine the details of how to implement the decision.)
Monitor and Control: State, where feasible, the method(s) you will use to
determine if your recommendation and implementation plans are working. Some
examples are use of budgets, regularly scheduled meetings, or scheduled reviews.
The approach you use will depend on the nature of the recommendation.
Exhibits: Exhibits may be used for such things as drawing process flow diagrams or
showing detailed calculations. Remember that the report should stand alone; the
exhibits provide supporting information only. An exhibit should be used when there
are more than a few lines of quantitative material in the body of the report.
Judgement and Integration: Pay close attention to the logic, structure and clarity
of the analysis. Is there a connecting thread or a sequence in the analysis or is it a
potpourri or hodgepodge of ideas and calculations? How well have knowledge and
concepts learned throughout the SSCMLP (concepts such as controls and
procedures to be addressed, spending authority, information systems to facilitate
data transfer, role and accountability of Supply Chain Management in
organizational structure) been integrated?
Written Case Grading: The case studies will be graded as indicated in the below sample worksheet.
Report Each section will carry an approximate weighting as indicated below. A completed is
(continued) sample is available in the Appendix of the manual.
I. PROCESS ELEMENTS 10
V. RECOMMENDATIONS 5
VI. IMPLEMENTATION 10
OVERALL
RACI Model The RACI model is tool used to identify roles and responsibilities of individuals and
Overview is often used by organizations when dealing with change management. The tool
applies a responsibility assignment methodology that works by assigning a level of
accountability to individuals. This model is an important strategic tool to use both
when creating and presenting a procurement plan of action.
Finance IT Legal HR
Supplier A C R I
Selection
Contract R I A C
Approval
The model should be applied as you work through the various stages of your
proposal to ensure that you have incorporated both internally and externally
(vendor), the various people, departments and factors that should play a role in your
assessment and final recommendation.
Self-Assessment Candidates will have the opportunity to review, test and reinforce their knowledge
Activities through self-assessment activities. These activities are not marked. Generally, the
activities require candidates to apply the concepts and tools learned in the session to
their own organizations, or to a case study. Candidates are strongly encouraged to
complete the self-assessment activities, as these activities provide further coverage of
the module content.
Module Ending A four-hour module ending examination consisting of a case analysis will be
Examination administered during the final session (session 13) of this module. This examination is
worth 25% of the total mark for the module.
The candidate must arrange for exam invigilation through their provincial or territorial
Institute.
Module Evaluation
Module At the end of the module, candidates are required to submit an evaluation form for this
Evaluation module, rating the module content and format.
Form
To obtain the evaluation form, please access the PMAC site at http://www.pmac.ca.
Then, click on the Education tab.
Then, on the right-hand menu, click on New Accreditation Program
The evaluation form will be in this menu.
Please print the form, complete it, and mail it to the following address:
Purchasing Management Association of Canada
777 Bay Street, Suite 2701
P.O. Box 112
Toronto, Ontario
M5G 2C8
Email: info@pmac.ca
Activity Directions
Module Overview Read the Introduction and Overview chapter to understand the
objectives for this module, and the methods of evaluation used
Overview of module, objectives for in this module.
module, and methods for candidate
evaluation.
Session Overview and Objectives Read What You Already Know, the Session Overview and the
Objectives found in this session.
Objectives, and a brief overview of the
session. Review the PowerPoint slides for this session (see the Appendix
of this manual. These slides are from the instructor-led version
of this module.)
Session Notes: Strategic vs. Tactical Read the session notes for this section.
Procurement
Here are the key teaching points:
Resources: • Evolution of procurement.
- Session Notes in this session • Modern perspective on procurement.
• Difference between strategy and tactics.
• Alignment of strategy and tactics with corporate level.
• Procurement is strategic, but uses tactics to meet the
strategic purpose.
Session Notes: Cavinato’s 5 Stages of Read the Cavinato article (see the Readings and Cases Manual).
Strategic Procurement A summary of Cavinato’s 5 stages is in the session notes.
Activity Directions
Session Notes: Spend Analysis Read the resources for this section.
Self-assessment Activity: Spend Read and complete the self-assessment activity in this session.
Analysis (not marked)
Resources:
- Session Notes and readings in this
session
Self-assessment Activity Evaluation When you are finished the self-assessment activity, review the
Self-assessment Evaluation section in this session.
Individual Exercise: Goods Spend Read the requirements and complete the exercise in this
Analysis at Your Organization session.
(marked – 5%)
Submit the exercise for evaluation. Refer to the Session
Schedule provided for submission instructions.
Session Notes: Defining Supply Risk Read the resources for this section.
Review of Written Case Report Review the Written Case Reports section of the Introduction
requirements and Overview chapter.
Session Wrap Up Review this session’s objectives. View the topics and
activities for the next session.
What You In Module 1, the focus was on supply chain management and relationship management
Already Know between and within organizations to achieve organizational goals. In this module the
focus is on a specific aspect of supply chain management – strategic procurement.
Strategic procurement is the driver of the supply chain. It is through strategic
procurement that the buying organization manages its supply chain. The field and
practice of strategic procurement includes entering into arrangements with various
suppliers including goods and service providers, logistics firms, information
consultants (such as technology consultants or legal counsel), and asset disposal
providers.
Overview In this session candidates will be introduced to some of the underlying concepts of
strategic procurement. It is important to remember that effective procurement is
strategic, and that strategic procurement is the examination and formulation of all
procurement activities and policies in alignment with the goals of the organization.
This is the link between procurement and supply chain management: procurement that
aligns with the goals of supply management at the organization, and with the
organization’s goals as a whole. Strategic procurement drives the whole supply chain.
In effect, strategic procurement “owns” the chain.
Even at the strategic level (i.e. answering the questions “why” and “where”),
procurement has tactical elements (i.e. answering the question “how”). As a warm up
to this module, candidates should assess the situation in their own organization. The
session examines some fundamental and strategic aspects of purchasing using
Cavinato’s five stages of strategic management. Cavinato lists a large number of
criteria for each stage of strategic management. For the purposes of this module, these
criteria have been distilled down to a more manageable number.
Then, the session examines spend analysis, which is a key tactical method for
facilitating strategy. Spend and indirect spend are defined, as are opportunities and
constraints to spend analysis. Using Heath’s approach, candidates are introduced to
dimensions of spend, as well as triggers for spending. Candidates are required to
perform an individual (marked) exercise on spend analysis.
The final part of the session considers procurement risk. Procurement risks are
important considerations in weighing strategies. There are also other risks to consider
in formulating procurement policies. Zsidisin’s definition of supply risk is examined.
Framework Framework questions help you focus on the issues presented in the session. Answer
Questions the following questions as you complete the readings and activities in this session.
This activity is not submitted for evaluation. See below for instructions on self-
evaluating this activity.
This exercise is worth 5% of the overall mark for this module. It must be typed and
double spaced, with 2.5 cm margins on all edges, and be in 12-point font. This
exercise is limited to a maximum of five pages. Remember to write in complete
sentences; do not use point form, except when providing a coherent list in a wider
context.
Refer to your Session Schedule for instructions on submitting this assignment for
marking.
There are three components to the exercise that must be handed in:
1. Show the steps you would use to conduct a goods spend analysis for your
organization.
3. Describe how spend analysis would fit within your current procurement strategy.
For more details on the characteristics and purposes of a goods spend analysis, refer to
the session notes and readings for this session.
Goods Spend The objectives of the activity are to familiarize the candidate with spend analysis
Analysis terminology, and to promote a strategic view of the candidate’s organization’s spend
analysis strategy. You do not have to submit this activity for marking; it is for self-
evaluation purposes only.
This activity is based on your own experience at your organization. The answers you
provide depend on your experience and position within the organization. You should
develop a list of reasons to adopt (or not adopt) spend analysis, and ways that the
adoption of spend analysis will (or won’t) benefit your organization.
Procurement Purchasing, procurement, and supply management has been defined in a variety of ways
and Supply by a variety of practitioners. In its earliest form, purchasing was seen as a function that
Management provided the right input at the right place at the right time. This dated perspective still
holds in some organizations. A modern view of procurement is that it is process-
oriented, and concerned with the management of all supplies of an organization, giving
rise to the term “supply management.” Supplies do not necessarily mean goods supplies
such as metal, pens, paper, and the like. Supplies also mean supplies of services such as
legal advice, and auditing, actuarial and engineering services, among others.
The focus on all supplies places procurement at the leading edge of managing corporate
supply chains. Through its processes, procurement determines the following:
• what specifically is required
• who will supply it
• how it will move from its source to destination
• how its performance or progression will be monitored
• how used assets, waste, scrap and redundant supplies will be disposed of
The role of procurement has expanded to encompass the lifecycle of the good or service
being acquired.
The overall goal, i.e. the strategic goal, is to provide value to the customer. Given
the breadth of the procurement process, procurement plays a key role in relationships
with other supply chain partners, as well as with the ultimate customer.
Strategic Stages Procurement is of vital strategic interest to the organization. Procurement also provides
of Purchasing tactical services to the organization. To better understand these roles, consider strategy as
reflecting “where are we going” while tactics answer the question “how are we getting
there”. An example of strategy is to require low-cost high-quality suppliers. An example
of a tactic to achieve that strategy is to single source. Another tactic is to enter into an
alliance with a key supplier.
Cavinato’s Five To understand where an organization is strategically placed, we can examine Cavinato’s
Stages of five stages of strategic management:
Strategic Stage 1: Basic financial planning
Management Stage 2: Forecast based planning
Stage 3: Externally oriented planning
Stage 4: Strategic management
Stage 5: Knowledge based business
The following table, abridged from Cavinato, highlights his staging with respect to
procurement.
Stage 1: Basic In stage 1, an organization operates at the basic budgeting level. The major performance
Financial criterion is to conform to budget, and control is enforced by financial accounting entities
Planning within the organization. In stage 1 organizations, procurement’s role is “buyer” only.
The strategic focus is finding the lowest price for an item (or driving the item price
down). The supply chain as a whole is not considered, as procurement’s role is to buy
goods for production. Value-creation (procurement’s value proposition) is to lower costs.
Management is reactive and focuses on conformity. In stage 1 organizations,
procurement’s authority is usually restricted to buying maintenance, repair and
operational items. Management focuses on meeting the standards, not changing policy.
Performance is measured exclusively in terms of financial targets.
Some supply chain perspective has been adopted, in that suppliers are seen as critical to
internal production. Management is focused primarily on process efficiency, and meeting
standards. Managers have authority to react to events in the marketplace, but not to
provide strategic direction for developing supply chain capabilities.
Stage 3: In stage 3, procurement begins to step into a more strategic role with a focus on
Externally- supporting lines of business. Procurement is managing a variety of supply chain
oriented activities in addition to basic acquisition. The supply chain view is holistic, from the
Planning supplier's suppliers to the final customer. At this stage, procurement becomes proactive
and the organization works with partners within the business.
Stage 4: In stage 4, procurement becomes strategic, and proactively creates value for the
Strategic organization in line with the strategy of the organization. The measurement of
Management procurement’s success is total supply chain costs. The supply chain from a procurement
perspective ranges from innovating with suppliers in design, through satisfaction creation
for the customer. Supply alliances become more common. Strategy focuses on
entrepreneurship as a member of development teams. Management is proactive. Team
leadership skills become important.
Stage 5: Stage 5 organizations use procurement as the driver of value creation from all elements
Knowledge- of the supply chain through to the final customer. Strategy is viewed as being an
based Business interpreter of external and internal customer needs, and a conduit through which those
needs are met. Procurement determines which needs are viable, and how to meet those
needs. The supply chain is viewed as a network, with many other possible networks
available. Management leads the organization in strategic supply chain development.
Skills needed by procurement staff include the ability to consult, receive feedback,
analyze, and implement (i.e. to act as a conduit between the organization and its
suppliers in the best interest of the organization’s customers and overall strategy).
Spend Analysis Spend analysis provides metrics to monitor organizational spending. Without accurate
information on spending, it is difficult to manage spend tactically and even less likely
that it will be managed strategically. Spend analysis provides information regarding
what amount of funds or how many transactions are related to a particular good or
service undertaken with a particular supplier or from a group within an organization.
Without proper spend analysis, opportunities are missed.
The Heath article (2006) refers to goods as commodities, and those who require spend
as customers, and those receive spend as suppliers or contractors. Heath suggests that
spend be analyzed by commodity, supplier and customer, and that ‘triggers’ be used to
select procurement enhancement opportunities. The triggers are dollar-value and
transaction-based. Suggested triggers for supplies to be considered for focus are:
There are barriers to spend analysis in many organizations, according to Heath these
include:
Procurement All procurement involves risk. Zsidisin’s article (2003) examines supply risk in a
Risk variety of organizations to develop a definition of this risk. The analysis suggests that
supply risk emerges from two sources:
• Individual supplier failures: Cases where the supplier does not meet the
requirements
• Market characteristics: Cases where there are market shortages or a non-
competitive market
The article also considers the outcomes from procurement risk. The typical outcome is
an inability of the purchasing organization to meet its customer’s requirements. This
ranges from missed shipments to failure to meet specifications. The ultimate effect of
failing to meet customer requirements is a negative effect on profits. The author also
notes that in several cases, the effect of supply risk is the safety of ultimate customers.
Using the results of the analysis, Zsidisin proposes that supply risk be defined as:
Review Now that you have looked at tactical vs. strategic aspects of procurement, stages of
Objectives for procurement management, procurement risk, and completed activities on spend
this Session analysis, you should review the session’s objectives as restated here:
Preview Next In session 1 we explored the tactical and strategic aspects of procurement. In session
Session 2, candidates will explore the procurement process in detail, and prepare a written
case report for the Blozis Company.
Procurement Process
Activity Directions
Session Overview and Objectives Read What You Already Know, the Session Overview and
the Objectives found in this session.
Objectives and a brief overview of the
session. Review the PowerPoint slides for this session (see the
Appendix of this manual. These slides are from the
instructor-led version of this module.)
Session Notes: Steps in the Read the resources for this section.
Procurement Process
Here is the key teaching point:
Resources: • Leenders’ 10 steps in the supply process (also see
- Leenders, Johnson, Flynn and Fearon, summary in session notes).
Purchasing and Supply Management
13th Ed. (page 61)
- Session notes
Session Notes: Needs Recognition and Read the resources for this section.
Description (Specification)
Here are the key teaching points:
Resources: • Describe need recognition and specification.
- Leenders, Johnson, Flynn and Fearon, • Understand the importance of the specification stage.
Purchasing and Supply Management
(pages 62 and 63).
- Session notes
Activity Directions
Session Notes: Supplier Selection, Read the resources for this section.
Ordering, Monitoring, Receipt and
Inspection, Payment, Documentation, Here is the key teaching point:
and Relationship Management - Understand the processes: supplier selection, ordering,
monitoring, receipt and inspection, payment, documentation
Resources: and relationship management. (Some of these will be
- Leenders, Johnson, Flynn and Fearon, covered in more depth in later sessions.)
Purchasing and Supply Management
(pages 65 to 73).
- Course notes
Individual Reflection: Follow up and Provide one or more examples of follow-up and expediting
Expediting (and other steps in the from your experience.
procurement process)
Key teaching points:
• There are different levels and approaches of follow-up
and expediting.
• There are different approaches to procurement at
different organizations.
Session Notes: Types of Specifications Read the resources for this section.
Activity Directions
Individual Case Report: Blozis Analyze the case using the Case Preparation method
(marked – 5%) described in the Introduction and Overview.
Session Wrap Up Review this session’s objectives. View the topics and
activities for the next session.
Procurement Processes
What You In the last session we saw that while modern procurement focuses on strategy, there are
Already Know also tactical elements. In this session the major procurement processes are considered,
as these form the basis of tactics to meet the strategy. As specification of needs and
requirements is a critical procedural step, candidates will prepare a case study related to
a conflict in specifications (Blozis Co.). This case also encourages an analysis of the
procedural elements of purchasing, and requires a restructuring of procedures.
Overview Building on the strategic and tactical approach of the previous session, candidates will
now be introduced to the key processes of procurement. While these processes are
more tactical and operational in nature, proper attention to procedural issues results in
effective implementation of procurement strategy.
The session involves the preparation of a case (Blozis Company) in which a key
problem area is specification development. In addition, the case highlights some areas
where there may be organizational issues.
Framework Framework questions help you focus on the issues presented in the session. Answer
Questions the following questions as you complete the readings and activities in this session.
Blozis Company:
1. Is the supply function organized properly? Is it strategic or tactical in nature?
2. How would you revise purchasing procedures at Blozis related to:
specifications, the use of requisitions, purchase orders, receipt and delivery?
3. What problems are likely to occur with the specifications as things now stand?
This case report is worth 5% of your overall mark for this module. Refer to your
Session Schedule for instructions on submitting this assignment for marking.
The requirements (i.e. the problems to be solved) for the written case report are stated at
the end of the case. In addition, your case report should address the following issues:
3. What problems are likely to occur with the specifications as things now stand?
To help you prepare for the report, see the session notes in this session. For further
reference, please see the sample case, Fabritek, 1992, and the sample case report in the
Appendix.
Procurement In most organizations procurement involves a sequence of activities that results in the
Processes acquisition of the required good or service. The ten steps in the sequence are:
1. Need recognition
2. Need description
3. Sourcing
4. Supplier selection
5. Ordering
6. Monitoring
7. Receipt and Inspection
8. Payment
9. Documentation
10. Relationship management
1. Need Need recognition is the process of identifying that a good or service is required and
Recognition determining the timing of the requirement. Need recognition may take place in many
parts of the organization simultaneously. For example in a manufacturing plant needs
may occur on the production floor for items such as welding rods. At the same time in
financial reporting there may be a need for audit services. The key to need recognition
from a strategic perspective is to ensure that procurement is working actively with
goods and services users, as well as with potential suppliers of those goods and
services.
2. Need Need description or specification is describing the need in sufficient detail to ensure
Description that the correct good or service is procured, in the correct quality, at the correct time,
(Specification) at the correct place. It is considered one of the most important keys to successful
procurement.
Specifications can range from simple to complex. An example of the former is copier
paper, while the latter may could include complex designs such as a computer main
board or an office tower. As need complexity increases so should the degree of
interaction between the procurement group, users and potential suppliers. The
advantage of increased procurement and supplier involvement is improved precision
of the specification, identification of a greater range of potential options, higher
quality and lower costs. Ultimately, correct specification yields higher customer
satisfaction. It is important to note the author’s comment about “mini processes that
are owned and managed by different functional areas of the organization” (Leenders,
p.63). This is quite typical and is to be avoided.
Identification can range from looking up suppliers in phone books or on the internet to
formal requests for proposals. Evaluation can range from a simple process such as
reviewing delivered price, to consulting procurement colleagues in other organizations
for their opinions, to multi-faceted evaluative models. Once the evaluation has been
made the supplier is selected.
5. Ordering Ordering is the process of making the purchase from the supplier. Orders can range
from simple purchase orders to complex contracts. When ordering paper for a copier a
simple purchase order or purchasing card may be used. For a complex product such as
an office building, contracts would be negotiated which lay out details of the project,
performance guarantees, milestone payments, and etc.
Follow up is the process of routine contact with the supplier as to the status of the
order. This can be as simple as a regular phone call or email, to presentations by the
supplier regarding the progress of completing complex goods or services.
The greater the integration of the supplier with the buying organization, the less
activity directed to monitoring. For example if the supplier actually manages the item
such as in supplier (vendor) managed inventory, follow-up may be less frequent, or
unnecessary.
7. Receipt and Receipt and inspection involves taking delivery of the good or service and checking
Inspection that it meets the specified requirement. In a manufacturing setting, receipt may be a
procedural process involving a formal “receiving” area where goods in a shipment are
matched against the order and inspected to ensure they are the correct goods in the
correct quantity. The goods are then transferred to the user departments or inventory,
along with the appropriate documentation.
Inspection may be as simple as the verification process just described or may involve
systematic quality-oriented inspection to ensure the goods fit and meet the required
performance standards. At this stage goods may be rejected and returned to the
supplier with related follow-up and corrective action required.
With services receipt and inspection also occurs; however, it is much more subtle. For
example, if a company uses consulting services to develop a strategic plan, the user
(executive) will receive the planning advice, review it and make suggestions for
changes.
8. Payment Payment is the process of clearing the invoice for the good or service and issuing
payment. Typically an indication is provided from the user (or from the receiving
department) to the accounts payable department, who will then issue full or partial
payment for the goods.
The actual process of paying for goods or services is not as important as ensuring
there is an alignment of the goals of the process with the overall corporate objectives.
An example of goal misalignment is when the corporate goal is to use suppliers as a
means of financing accounts payable (i.e. extending payment terms to their
maximum), while the procurement goal is to pay invoices quickly in order to acquire
discounts and future price reductions from suppliers.
9. Documentation Documentation includes completion of all the paperwork related to the goods and
service purchased including: bills of lading, invoices, payment requisitions, payment
registers, and more.
Documentation also includes the completion of documents related to the process used
to acquire the goods and services, i.e. How was the specification developed? Which
suppliers were contacted? How were they evaluated (and etc)? The more complex
the purchased good or service, the greater the need for accurate and clear
documentation that documents the whole procurement cycle.
10. Relationship Relationship management is the process of managing internal and supplier
Management relationships. This may include ongoing liaison with the supplier with respect to
failures or repair and maintenance.
Specifications It is important to identify the type of specification applicable to the good or service
and being purchased, and then identify the best process to define the specification.
standardization Specifications can be simple or complex. Standardization may apply to both simple
and complex specifications.
Simple A simple specification provides a high level description of the product or service
Specifications needed. An example of a simple specification is “provide automotive batteries”.
Function and Fit: describe how the good and service will fit and within the larger
product or service.
Function and fit involve more teamwork between the supplier and buyer as well as
within the buying organization to ensure the fit and function goals align with the
larger goals. Suppliers are often integrated into the design process.
Simple Samples: A sample is product designed by a potential supplier to meet the buyer’s
Specifications need. A classic example of a sample is an artist’s proof used in print work. The
(continued) problem with a sample is that it may not meet the needs of the production process or
the end user. Furthermore, samples or prototypes impose additional costs on suppliers.
A sample may be required when the good or service is highly complex. It can be an
inexpensive way to test a concept or finalize the specification of a good or service.
Grades: Grades are an agreed upon set of standards for a good. An example of a
grade is “regular unleaded gasoline”. Grades typically apply to a commodity. An
example of a specification is: a flour mill requires # 1 hard spring wheat.
Commercial specifications are similar to grades, however, are used where the
product is not a commodity in nature. Commercial standards come with a complete
description of the product. An example is the American Petroleum Institute Standards
for motor oil.
Complex Engineering drawings: Are used either by themselves or to enhance the description
Specifications developed in a design specification. Such drawings (or blueprints) provide a detailed
(continued) view of the product required. While more costly to prepare than a design
specification, engineering drawings provide greater precision in detail, and act as a
guide to measure quality. Engineering drawings are a simple way to describe
relatively complex parts, and allow more options for sourcing, as the drawings can be
provided to a variety of possible suppliers.
Specification There are a variety of approaches used to develop specifications. As a general rule,
Development the interrelationship between internal departments should increase as the importance
and complexity of the item being acquired (or supplied) increases (see Figure 2.1).
For low complexity and important supplies, the user department may have little need
to be involved (example cleaning services) so both departmental and procurement
involvement is minimal. Conversely for an important mission critical supply,
(example: the type of beef served in a chain of high-end steak houses) the chef, the
restaurant, and the procurement department would have a high level of interaction.
High
Complexity
and
Departmental Importance of
Involvement the supply
Low
Low High
Procurement
Involvement
Specification In addition to the organizational challenges related to the proper level of involvement,
Problems there are a variety of common problems which may occur in specification preparation:
Lack of clarity: The specification is not precise enough in order to meet the
requirement. This may occur due to lack of bidders for the work as they do not
understand what is required, or when the work being undertaken is incorrect, resulting
in re-work.
Review Now that you have looked at procurement processes and have examined a case to do
Objectives for with specifications, you should review the session’s objectives as restated here:
this Session
Upon completion of this session candidates should be able to:
Preview Next In session 2 we explored the procurement process. In session 3, candidates will
Session explore competitive bidding and negotiations, and prepare a written case report for De
Havilland Inc.
Activity Directions
Session Overview and Objectives Read What You Already Know, the Session Overview and
the Objectives found in this session.
Objectives and a brief overview of the
session. Review the PowerPoint slides for this session (see the
Appendix of this manual. These slides are from the
instructor-led version of this module.)
Session Notes: Competitive Bidding Read the resources for this section.
Individual Reflection: Example of Write down examples from your own experience of each
Competitive Bidding type of competitive bid.
Activity Directions
Session Notes: the Negotiation Process Read the resources for this section.
Case Preparation: De Havilland – Parties, Prepare for writing the case report. First, decide what is
Value, and Barriers De Havilland’s BATNA. Then, focus on parties in the
negotiation, value of the negotiations, and barriers to
negotiation.
Activity Directions
Case Preparation: Power Relationships Determine the power relationships that exist in the De
and Ethics in the De Havilland Case Havilland case. Also, list the ethical issues that arise
before, during, and after negotiations.
Individual Case Report: De Havilland Analyze the case using the Case Preparation method
(marked – 10%) described in the Introduction and Overview.
Session Wrap Up Review this session’s objectives. View the topics and
activities for the next session.
What You In this session, candidates are introduced to concepts related to competitive bidding
Already Know and negotiation. Competitive bidding is a method to source suppliers. Negotiation is an
approach to acquire the good or service at a fair and reasonable price. Negotiation
impacts the ordering and payment processes reviewed in session 2, as well as price and
supplier relationships, which are topics in later sessions.
Overview In this session the focus is on competitive bidding and negotiation. Competitive
bidding and negotiation are considered unique approaches to acquiring a product or
service. The criteria that support choosing one or the other are reviewed. Common
types of competitive bids are considered.
1. Understand the factors that suggest bidding is more appropriate than negotiation and
vice versa.
2. Determine whether negotiation or bidding is more suited to a particular situation.
3. Describe types of bids.
4. State the objectives of a negotiation.
5. Define the keys steps in negotiations.
6. Prepare a negotiating plan.
Framework Framework questions help you focus on the issues presented in the session. Answer
Questions the following questions as you complete the readings and activities in this session.
1. What are some of the methods of competitive bidding that I am familiar with?
2. Does my organization have a formal approach to negotiation? Should it?
3. What would the advantages and disadvantages be of a formal approach to
negotiating?
De Havilland Inc.:
1. What are some possible BATNAs for De Havilland? For Marton?
2. Who are the parties and what were their interests/objectives?
3. What is the potential value to be created?
4. What are some potential barriers to success?
5. What are the power relationships between De Havilland and Marton?
6. What are some possible ethical considerations?
This case report is worth 10% of your overall mark for this module. Refer to your
Session Schedule for instructions on submitting this assignment for marking.
The requirement for the written case report is: considering the following questions, as
Kim Tomar, write a report stating the issues, criteria, analysis and plan of action (i.e.
recommendations) to De Havilland’s Source Selection Board.
To help you prepare for the report, see the session notes in this session. For further
reference, please see the sample case, Fabritek, 1992, and the sample case report in the
Appendix.
Conditions Competitive bidding is when an open offer is made to potential bidders to respond to a
for specification. When the offer is widely distributed, perhaps through a newspaper or on the
Competitive internet, it also provides an opportunity to identify previously unknown suppliers.
Bidding Therefore, it is also a method of identifying potential new sources.
Significant Contract:
The amount of the contract put out to bid must be significant enough to warrant the effort
on the supplier’s part to bid on the contract. For example it may be appropriate for a small
company to put a contract for a new office building to bid. However if the company uses
one case of pens a year, it would be inappropriate to put that requirement to bid.
Clear Specification:
The specification must be clear to both the buying organization and potential supplier. If
the specification is imprecise or ill defined, two problems may occur:
• The number of bids is minimal as few suppliers wish to take a chance on providing
the product or service.
• The bids that arrive may not be comparable due to bidders interpreting the
requirement differently.
Often the buying company may have a time period where bidders are allowed to ask
questions about the product or service. These questions and answers are typically made
available to all bidders.
Supplier Diversity:
There must be enough sellers in the market to prevent collusion or bid allocation.
Collusion occurs where bidders gang up to provide a consistent price. Bid allocation
occurs where bidders determine which organizations will bid, or alternately which
organization will have the lowest price.
Supplier Ability:
There must be suppliers that are qualified and able to provide the product or service. If
there are no qualified suppliers, the best potential supplier is chosen, and the buying
organization enters negotiation with the supplier to qualify them. Even if there are
qualified suppliers they may not want to bid on the work. Bidders must be qualified and
willing in order for competitive bidding to apply.
Types of In practice there are many variants of competitive bidding. The typical or most common
Competitive types are as follow:
Bids
Request for quotation (RFQ). Provides a clear requirement and asks organizations to bid
with a firm price to provide the product or service. A typical example is for a grade or
commercial standard.
Request for information (RFI) An approach to pre-qualify organizations who then may
be asked to provide a quotation for the product or service. Typically the buying
organization provides the requirement and seeks organizations to provide information
related to their willingness and ability to provide the product or service.
Request for Proposal (RFP). Typically identifies the requirement and asks suppliers to
propose a solution along with the price for that solution. These are used for more complex
purchases such as office space requirements or custom built software.
Reverse auction. In a reverse auction the buyer provides the requirement to a group of
potential suppliers. In the auction the suppliers bid prices down in order to receive the
contract to provide the product or service. Typically these are conducted over the internet.
Auction (or Forward Auction). The purchaser bids against other bidders for the supply
of the product or service.
Negotiation Negotiation typically occurs where the buying organization has selected a supplying
and Bidding organization with whom they wish to conduct business.
At times negotiation may become a secondary part of the competitive bidding process;
however, caution should be considered in this approach as it undermines the purpose of
RFPs and RFQs.
For instance, if the bid in the RFP or RFQ is negotiable, then what is the price the vendor
should provide: their best price, or a higher price to be negotiated once the RFP or RFQ is
accepted?
Negotiation in combination with bidding may occur where an RFI has been used, or where
the request is for technical proposals. In either case price should be absent from the bid
requirement.
When is Negotiation is applicable in cases where the conditions for competitive biding are not met.
Negotiation
Applicable? Negotiation is also applicable where:
• Costs and risk are hard to estimate. An example is the development of new specialized
software for a company. Typically this occurs where technical proposals have been
submitted.
• Price (or cost) is not the most important decision variable. In cases where factors such
as quality, delivery assurance or intangibles (such as brand alliance) are important
then negotiations with the supplier are required.
• The specification will likely change.
• Special needs are important and a significant component of costs. Through negotiation
the fair value and responsibility for costs can be determined.
• Supplier involvement is important, particularly early on.
• There are long lead times so product development and improvement can occur as part
of the work.
The objectives of negotiation relate to these conditions. A significant, but not necessarily
the most important, objective of negotiation is to obtain a fair and reasonable price. The
price must be acceptable to the buyer and supplier. A specified quality level or a goal of
continuous quality improvement may be a negotiating objective. Negotiation may also be
used to ensure a specified level of performance, for example, with respect to delivery
times. In certain cases an objective may be to ensure greater co-operation from the
supplier or to have more control. Finally negotiation may be useful in building a long term
relationship with the supplier, as it starts to consolidate the relationship between the
buying and selling organization.
What Can Be The old saying is that everything is negotiable. Typically items that are negotiable fall into
Negotiated five groupings: price, transportation, supply, support and quality.
Price: negotiation focuses on obtaining a fair and reasonable price for the overall
purchase. Within that goal, the buyer may wish to negotiate discounts. These could be in
the form of a straight volume discount per order, to cumulative discounts over a range of
orders. Payment terms may also be negotiable. This could include interest charged on
overdue accounts, to payment schedules.
What Can Be Supply factors relate to the actual good itself. The lead time between order and delivery
Negotiated may be negotiated or alternately the delivery dates. Options to expand the requirement or
(continued) cancel the requirement (along with penalties) may be included. For large projects such as
capital projects, bonds may be required as part of the supply agreement. In the ultimate
case, the buying organization may wish to limit their involvement with the particular
supply, moving to supply (or vendor) managed inventory.
Support is a variety of activities that improve productivity related to the good or service.
For a new software system, support might include training and the ability to call the
developer when problems arise. Support may involve the warranty provided on the good
or service. For industrial machines it may include either spare parts or an agreement on the
time frame in which spares will be available.
Quality is also subject to negotiation. Quality negotiations may include anything from
what the performance requirements for the good or service are, to how those are to be
measured, through to a system of continuous improvement.
The The most important part of negotiations is to develop a negotiation plan. A standard
Negotiation negotiating plan will consist of five basic steps:
Plan • Selecting the team and team leader
• Analysis
• Mock negotiations
• Negotiations.
• Post Negotiation
Depending on the value or importance of the product or service being negotiated, the
effort put into each step should be adjusted. It is not appropriate to have a large full
empowered team for negotiating small items ( for example, office supplies) and
conversely it is not appropriate to have a small underpowered team to negotiate large
value items (for example, engine assemblies for a new vehicle).
Teams The first step is to establish the team and team leader. Team size may vary depending on
the importance of the item. For small importance items it may only require staff of the
supply department. For significant items it may include members from finance, marketing
engineering and procurement. The key is to involve areas with a significant interest in the
outcome of the negotiations. Typically the team leader is from the procurement area.
Within the team there should be several clear cut rules for the negation phase, such as:
there is only one spokesperson. Internal disagreements are aired outside the negotiation.
Wheeler’s Six According to Wheeler there are six steps in the analysis phase and 1 additional
Steps of consideration. The six steps are:
Negotiation
Analysis • BATNA: What to do in the event an agreement is not reached?
• Identification of the parties.
• Assessing the interests of the parties and their priorities.
• Determining the value that will be created and how it will be distributed.
• Identifying barriers to success.
• Considering the effect of power relationships.
In addition to these steps, an important consideration is the ethical issues related to the
negotiation.
Identification of the Parties. The members of the other negotiating group are not
necessarily the key parties to the negotiation. When preparing to negotiate identify who
the key parties are for both the current negotiation and for a BATNA.
Assessing the interests of the parties and their priorities. In this phase, the objectives
regarding the key BATNAs of the buyer, seller and potential other parties are defined.
Suppose the negotiation is for a new office tower. The buyer of the building may have
objectives related to price, operating cost, esthetics, and environmental impact. The seller
may have objectives related to profit, creating a landmark (reputation) and relationship to
the local community. A further party may be the City itself who wants to use the building
as an anchor for redevelopment. In preparing for negotiation, all these parties’ interests
should be analyzed and potential BATNA reviewed.
Wheeler’s Six Determining the value that will be created and how it will be distributed. In this stage
Steps of the value proposition is considered. In terms of sequence the first goal is to create value,
Negotiation the second is to obtain an appropriate share of the value.
Analysis
(continued) Identifying barriers to success. Even if there is a value to be captured by both parties,
this does not necessarily mean that an agreement will be reached. Barriers occur in a
variety of areas. Strategic barriers occur where the parties overstate their positions. This
may in the worse case scenario result in a position where the party is locked into their
position, making agreement difficult if not impossible. Interpersonal relationships are a
factor in negotiations as trust breaks down. Institutional barriers may affect negotiations.
Considering the building example above, the two parties may agree, but local regulations
may prevent the agreed upon position being implemented.
Related to these analytical steps is the matter of ethics. Ethics are the principles of
conduct governing an individual or a profession. Ethics enter into negotiations in a variety
of ways. A series of ethical question should be considered in the preparatory phase of the
negotiation. Some of these may include:
Negotiations
In their text, Lysons and Farrington (2005) describe 5 stages within a successful
negotiation:
• The first stage is introductions, agreement on the agenda and rules of procedure.
• Stage 2 involves clarifying the issues that the negotiation will address.
• Stage 3 results in goal alignment between the parties. The goals to be achieved will be
agreed upon. Some movement from positions related to the initial definition of the
issues can be expected.
• The fourth stage is removal of impediments to reaching common goals.
• The final stage is drafting of the agreement and ending the negotiation.
Post Negotiation
In this phase the i’s are dotted and t’s crossed in the agreement, perhaps with the help of
legal counsel. During this phase the negotiating team documents the negotiation process
and conducts debriefing sessions on the negotiation process.
Review Now that you have looked at the criteria for competitive bidding and negotiation, and
Objectives for have recommended a course of action for De Havilland Inc., you should review the
this Session session’s objectives as restated here:
1. Understand the factors that suggest bidding is more appropriate than negotiation
and vice versa.
2. Determine whether negotiation or bidding is more suited to a particular situation.
3. Describe types of bids.
4. State the objectives of a negotiation.
5. Define the keys steps in negotiations.
6. Prepare a negotiating plan.
Preview Next In session 3 we explored bidding and negotiations. In session 4, candidates will
Session explore managing procurement and the financial leverage effect, and prepare an
exercise on centralization vs. decentralization.
Activity Directions
Session Overview and Objectives Read What You Already Know, the Session Overview and the
Objectives found in this session.
Objectives and a brief overview of the
session. Review the PowerPoint slides for this session (see the
Appendix of this manual. These slides are from the instructor-
led version of this module.)
Session Notes: Internal Procurement Read the resources for this section.
Relationships
Here are the key teaching points:
Resources: • Procurement interactions with different business units.
- Burt, Dobler and Starling, World • The types of interactions are different.
Class Supply Management, (Pages 41 • The importance of internal relationship management.
to 49)
- Session notes
Activity Directions
Session Notes: Financial Leverage The financial leverage effect may be difficult to approach.
Effect Review the example of the financial leverage effect provided in
the session notes. Also, review the different example provided in
Resources: the session slides.
- Session notes
Here are the key teaching points:
• There is synergy between financial objectives and
procurement objectives
• There is an important relationship with finance
• The financial leverage effect is a way to empower
procurement
Self-assessment Activity: Financial Read and complete the self-assessment activity in this session.
Leverage Effect
(not marked)
Self-assessment Activity When you are finished the self-assessment activity, review the
Evaluation Self-assessment Evaluation section in this session.
Activity Directions
Session Notes: Read the resources for this section.
Procurement Org.
Structures Here are the key teaching points:
• Types of procurement organization structures
Resources: • Advantages and disadvantages of each
- Johnson and Leenders. • The key factors that guide procurement organization structure (Johnson
The Supply Organizational and Leenders)
Dilemma • Effect of organizational change on procurement
- Session notes
Individual Exercise: Read the requirements and complete the exercise in this session.
Centralization vs.
Decentralization Submit the exercise for evaluation. Refer to the Session Schedule provided for
(marked – 5%) submission instructions.
Session Wrap Up Review this session’s objectives. View the topics and activities for the next
session.
What You The previous session reviewed the concepts of specifications, bidding and negotiation.
Already Know This session builds further on internal supply relationships and cross functional teams.
Overall corporate strategy from the top level down is reviewed, and the issue of
centralized versus decentralized procurement is examined.
Overview Who do procurement team members meet with? Why? The first part of this session
deals with these issues. Overall the goal of procurement is to have healthy, open
relationships directed toward corporate strategic goals with all relevant parties in the
organization. This session also provides the candidate with an overview of the
significant leverage effect that procurement may have on financial results.
Framework Framework questions help you focus on the issues presented in the session. Answer
Questions the following questions as you complete the readings and activities in this session.
Self-assessment Calculate the financial leverage effect at Tricorp, using the following information.
Activity
You are the Director of Strategic Procurement with Tricorp, a company that
(not marked)
manufacturers aftermarket automotive sheet metal. At the latest strategic planning
session there was concern over the slow deterioration of Tricorp’s shares. Some
investment analysts had been commenting that the return on assets was lower relative to
other automotive suppliers. As part of the strategic commitment you agreed to review
procurement costs with your team. You assign Eric Morales, a PMAC certified CPP to
see if there is a way to cut costs of materials.
Sales: $75,000,000
Overhead: $18,000,000
Inventory: $7,000,000
Cash: $5,000,000
Accounts Receivable: $7,000,000
Total Current Assets $19,000,000
Eric comes up with two options. The first is a decrease in sheet metal costs of
$2,000,000. The second is a decrease in the cost of dies of $1,000,000. What is the
effect of each option on the ROA for Tricorp?
Refer to your Session Schedule for instructions on submitting this assignment for
marking.
1. Select one organization that uses centralized purchasing. This could be your current
organization, or a previous organization. (If you do not have an example from your
own experience, please feel free to use the cases in this module.) Prepare a written
report of the changes if any that could be made toward decentralization. Justify
keeping the status quo or the changes.
2. Select one organization that uses decentralized purchasing. This could be your
current organization, or a previous organization. (If you do not have an example
from your own experience, please feel free to use the cases in this module.)
Prepare a written report of changes if any that could be made toward centralization.
Justify keeping the status quo or the changes.
For more details on centralization and decentralization, refer to the session notes and
readings for this session.
Before After
option 1 option 2
*Note person in charge of unit: the 560 000 $ (be 8% of 7 MM $) and the 280 000 $ (be 4% of 7 MM $) are the same percentages that those of
the reduction of the cost of the matters. Hypothesis of the designer = there is a direct link between these two elements. In practice, it arrives
often that the matrix cost (equipment) is absorbed.
Procurement Procurement should be a central hub for departments within an organization. The
Internal procurement as a hub perspective assures that procurement is involved in the many
Relationships areas where it can provide a positive effect. Procurement should be aware, and in
contact with, the many parts of the organization that may affect procurement
processes.
Production. It is through procurement that goods and services are made available for
production. Examples include raw materials for transformation such as paper in a print
plant, to call centre services for a software producer. At the same time procurement
relies on production. Production requirements and schedules provide inputs into the
procurement cycle. Without these, supply shortages and excesses may occur resulting
in production downtime, or excess resources being tied up in inventory.
Finance. Procurement works with finance, in terms of payment for goods and services
purchased. The goal is alignment of finance’s requirements with benefits that
procurement can negotiate with suppliers. At the same time procurement can provide
substantial financial leverage benefits for a corporation.
Marketing. Sales forecasts drive the production schedule in most organizations and
consequently drive supply requirements. At the same time, procurement is an
important focal point in the provision of goods and services for the organization to
market. Through procurement, costs and price is affected, as is quality and
availability.
Procurement Legal. Many procurement agreements, especially for large capital items, may be quite
Internal complex. Accordingly, legal counsel may be involved. From time to time
Relationships relationships with suppliers may fail, due to a variety of reasons. The result may be
(continued) legal and procurement working together to resolve the issues.
The Leverage Better procurement management has a powerful effect on financial results. Consider
Effect of an organization with the following Income Statement and Balance Sheet.
Improved
Procurement on
Financial Results Income Statement (partial)
Sales: $60,000,000
Material: $35,000,000
Labour: $15,000,000
Overhead: $ 5,000,000
Cost of Goods Sold: $55,000,000
Gross Profit $5,000,000
Inventory: $5,000,000
Cash: $3,000,000
Accounts
Receivable: $2,500,000
Total Current Assets: $10,500,000
Land: $10,000,000
Building: $21,000,000
Total Fixed Assets: $31,000,000
Suppose through strategic procurement activities the costs of material are reduced by
10% to $31,500,000.
Cross Functional Cross functional teams are teams directed towards a common goal that use resources
Teams: across the organization. In procurement, the goal might be the acquisition of a new
Benefits service such as technology support or a component for a new product such as a jet
engine assembly for a new airplane. Cross functional teams are becoming more
common-place. Some of the reasons for, and benefits of cross functional teams are:
• The realization that procurement is strategic and has a significant financial
impact
• Teams yield better results than individual activity
• The ability to cut timelines (provided the team performs effectively)
• They improve cross organizational communication and use of information
• The increasingly complicated nature of products and the inputs to products
(global supply chains, high quality requirements)
• They improve the ability of an organization to deal with these complex
issues and products
• Greater creativity and brainstorming
Cross Functional The use of cross functional teams is not without problems. Some of these are:
Teams:
Problems • Role conflicts for team members between their individual and team duties
• Excessive workloads for some team members
• Ineffective reward mechanisms for team players
• Loss of knowledge: team members may devote more time to teamwork and
less time understanding the specifics of their subject area
• Cost of training and retraining team members
Cross Functional There are a number of critical success factors for successful cross functional team
Teams: deployment:
Critical Success • Executive sponsorship is a necessity. In order for resources to be freed to the
Factors team, senior management must release time of those resources. Through
executive sponsorship, the resources are made available. Issues and
developments within the teams can be brought forward at a senior level as
necessary.
• Effective leadership as a second success factor. While there are many qualities
that go into successful leadership, generally effective team leaders are non
autocratic, communicators who focus on team dynamics and team goals. Such
leaders gain power through their ability to build consensus. They do not attain
their stature in the team through their formal organizational hierarchical
position. For the team to work effectively, the right people must be on the team.
Are all the areas with vested interest represented? Are the members of the team
competent? Do they want to be on and contribute to the team? Do they have the
ability to adapt to the requirements of the team?
• Once a group of team members has been selected, the members will need
training in order to effectively reach the team goal. Training can range from
group dynamics through effective communications to specific technical skills to
work on the project.
• Finally for a team to be successful it will need resources to undertake the work.
Resources include rooms, technologies and materials to support the team effort.
It also includes sufficient time to undertake the work.
Ways of Most of the literature related to supply management suggests there are three models
Organizing for organizing procurement:
Procurement • The centralized structure approach creates a central procurement organization for
all locations and divisions of the organization.
• In a decentralized approach procurement activities are disbursed throughout the
organization.
• Hybrids are a combination of the two, where certain activities are managed by a
central procurement function while others are distributed throughout the
organization.
Centralized - Advantages
• Can achieve cost savings
• Reduces supplier costs as they have to deal with only one part of the buying
organization
• Procurement staff can specialize
• Simpler co-ordination and control
• Easier to develop a strategic view
Centralized – Disadvantages
• May work against teamwork approach
• Potential for too much control
• Isolation from business units
• Positions may become too specialty focused and this can disenfranchise staff
Decentralized – Advantages
• Speedier response for business units
• Creates more incentive to use local supply good local PR
• Results in wider job authority potential a staff motivator
Decentralized – Disadvantages
• Loss of volume opportunities
• Communication may be more difficult
• May lack strategic view as focus is on operational needs of the business unit
• Will have inconsistencies between business units in terms of goods and
services
The Hybrid The hybrid approach is an attempt to capture the advantages of centralization and
Approach and decentralization without the related disadvantages. In the hybrid structure, the central
Trends in areas role may be the co-ordination of activities across units (for example sources,
Procurement policies, procedures) in keeping with overall corporate strategy. At the business unit
Organization level the actual procurement occurs. Alternately, the central group may be responsible
for “strategic” purchases, while the business units are responsible for operational
purchases.
Large multi-unit organizations tend to migrate from one approach to the other over
time. The Johnson and Leenders article shows that while the advantages and
disadvantages of centralized versus decentralized structures may be a partial
consideration in the how procurement is organized, there are larger overarching
considerations.
The analysis indicates that it is external environmental factors such as costs and
market dynamics that drive the changes, since these factors also drive corporate
strategic initiatives. As these initiatives cause changes in the corporate organizational
structure the procurement area adapts to the new organizational structure. Within this
paradigm of change major influencers, generally from the Chief Executive Office
affect the change. At the same time, moderators affect the pace and type of change.
Moderators range from external consultants to business unit managers.
Johnson and Leenders also suggest that the shift in the procurement organization had
substantial effects on the procurement function:
• Typically the Chief Purchasing Officer (CPO) was responsible for the re-
alignment, and it was often necessary to change the CPO.
• Second, the implementation phase caused a significant stress for staff of the
procurement organization.
• Third, establishing a shared services organization which charged for its services
was often a common tactic to procurement reorganization where centralization
occurred, as well as where decentralization occurred.
• Finally where the organization was moving toward centralization issues arose
with the skills of staff, as there may not have been sufficient numbers of senior or
even middle-level staff to effectively resource the new central organization.
Review Now that you have looked at the management of procurement, and have analyzed
Objectives for centralized vs. decentralized operations, you should review the session’s objectives as
this Session restated here:
Make or Buy
Z Make or Buy
Z Core Competencies
Z Core Products
Z Total Cost of Ownership: Elements
Z Total Cost of Ownership: Benefits
Z Total Cost of Ownership: Implementation
Activity Directions
Session Overview and Read What You Already Know, the Session Overview and the Objectives
Objectives found in this session.
Objectives and a brief Review the PowerPoint slides for this session (see the Appendix of this
overview of the session. manual. These slides are from the instructor-led version of this module.)
Activity Directions
Individual Reflection: Core Reflect on the following questions:
Competencies at Your 1. Does your organization have core competencies? What are they?
Organization 2. What are your organization’s core products? Do they flow from the
core competencies?
Activity Directions
Session Notes: Calculating Read the resources for this section.
TCO
Key teaching points:
Resources - Learn to calculate present value.
- Session Notes - Perform the steps in total cost of ownership analysis.
- Examples in session notes - Apply total cost of ownership analysis to your organization, or to the
- Examples in PowerPoint examples provided (i.e. determine what the numbers really mean).
slides
Individual Case Report: Analyze the case using the Case Preparation method described in the
Make or Buy and TCO – Introduction and Overview.
Happyland Construction
(marked – 5%) Prepare the case report according to the instructions in this session. Also,
use the guidelines in the Written Case Reports section of the
Resources: Introduction and Overview.
− Happyland case
− Introduction and Submit the case report for evaluation. Refer to the Session Schedule for
Overview: Written submission instructions.
Case Reports (report
guidelines) Here are the key teaching points:
− Session notes in this • Apply the total cost of ownership in a make of buy decision.
session • Examine the qualitative factors in a make or buy decision.
− PowerPoint slides for • Calculate TCO correctly – this will ensure you have the information
this session you need to make the decision.
− Framework questions in • Provide your recommendations.
this session
− Required readings for
this session
− Fabritek, 1992 Sample
Case and Report
(Appendix)
Session Wrap Up Review this session’s objectives. View the topics and activities for the
next session.
Make or Buy
What You An important strategic and tactical decision is whether to make or buy a particular
Already Know product or service. Make or buy depends on procurement processes such as
specification, sourcing, competitive bidding and negotiation (see session 3). If buy is
the dominant focus of the organization, this will have ramifications on the organization
design and supply relationships. You may already have faced these kinds of decisions
at your organization. This session will explore the issues and strategies behind make or
buy decisions.
Overview Make or buy has both strategic and tactical elements. At the strategic level, make or
buy depends on two significant factors: the core competencies of the organization and
the threat of supplier dependence. At the tactical level cost is the significant issue in the
decision. The appropriate method to assess cost is through the life cycle approach
where all costs (pre-transaction, transaction and post-transaction) are considered. The
make or buy decision is also influenced by tactical issues such as production
availability of capacity and qualitative factors (e.g. raw material quality).
The life cycle approach or total cost of ownership is a critical element of make or buy.
Since the decisions involved in determining total costs of ownership are for products
and services that are used over a period of time, discounted cash flow analysis is an
important part of calculating total cost of ownership.
Framework Framework questions help you focus on the issues presented in the session. Answer
Questions the following questions as you complete the readings and activities in this session.
1. Does your organization deploy make or buy analysis? Why? Why not?
2. In your organization have you considered the strategic level factors related to
make or buy?
3. Is your organization organized on a strategic business unit or core competence
basis?
4. Does your organization have core competencies? What are they?
5. What are your organization’s core products? Do they flow from the core
competencies?
6. Do you use total cost of ownership in your organization?
7. What are the pros and cons of using total cost of ownership in your organization?
This case report is worth 5% of your overall mark for this module. Refer to your
Session Schedule for instructions on submitting this assignment for marking.
The requirements for the written case report are stated below.
To help you prepare for the report, see the session notes in this session. For further
reference, please see the sample case, Fabritek, 1992, and the sample case report in the
Appendix.
Bill: I see that the GargantuLift 6000 is being recommended, what sort of
financial analysis has been done to date?
Sid: We have examined both the purchase price and cost information for the
GargantuLift, and the team is quite confident it is a best buy for the work we
need to do.
Bill: What about costs such as defining the requirement and investigating
alternate sources?
Sid: We did a lot of prior research working with mine production staff and
engineering. We also spent considerable time finding alternate supplies. Mega
Corp appears to be the best source.
Bill: What did all that internal time and effort amount to?
Sid: About $500,000.
Bill: Any other financial analyses planned?
Sid: We expect to do a total cost of ownership study. Betty Jolly who works in
my area will be doing the analysis. She sent the following by email this morning
knowing you and I would be meeting:
Individual Bill: That looks good but do not forget we depreciate our capital assets over 5
Written Case years using a straight line approach, and use a discount rate of 5%. When Betty
Report is finished, let’s sit down with Kerry Contented the CEO and go over the
(continued) analysis.
The next day Sid and Betty meet with Bill (CFO) and Kerry (CEO).
Betty investigates and finds that Digger Construction will supply a GargantuLift to
Happyland for $1,500,000 yearly payable at the end of the year for the next 10 years.
Digger will be responsible for all maintenance, operating and decommissioning at the
end of 10 years. Happyland will provide the operators.
Requirements:
1. Prepare Betty’s original make analysis (as best you can).
2. Then, prepare the buy analysis Sid has promised.
3. Compare both make and buy analyses. What is the best choice?
4. What are the qualitative factors that should be considered?
Make or Buy Make or buy involves decisions related to producing a good or service in house or buying
Decisions the good or service. There are two levels to the make or buy decision - strategic decisions
and tactical decisions.
Core competencies: The make or buy should be consistent with the core competencies of
the organization. Organizations should consider carefully before outsourcing any activity
that is a core organizational competency (e.g. if the organization is a specialty
manufacturer or service provider).
Supplier dependence: The make or buy decision should consider the potential that the
supplier may attain sufficient power that they are able to dictate future arrangements with
the organization. This would put the organization in a position of dependence on a single
supplier, and affect the critical operations of the organization.
Total cost of ownership: The approach (either to make or buy) should reflect the lowest
total cost of ownership. Total cost of ownership is ownership over time, and any
calculation of total cost of ownership must also account for the time value of money
(discounted cash flow analysis).
If there is limited available production capacity (or other production can not be shifted to
increase production capacity for the product or service) a buy decision should be seriously
considered.
If the critical nature of the component increases or there are concerns with potential
supply disruptions, a make decision should be seriously considered.
The make or buy decision is also affected by the quality of inputs available from suppliers.
Some of the quality (and intangible) factors that support a buy decision are:
Some of the quality (and intangible) factors that support a make decision are:
• The quantities are too small to contract to suppliers (no economy of scale)
• Making the product or service allows for greater organizational integration (e.g.
economy of scale is achieved through assembly of many different products at the
same plant)
• Potential suppliers in the current market are considered unreliable
• Management believes that there will be shortages in the future, and that the
organization must make the product or service to assure supply
• There is local political pressure, or union pressure to maintain a stable workforce
(the organization may be experiencing declining orders for other products or
services)
• Management requires the organization to maintain or increase control over the
product line
Core Prahalad and Hamel (1990) provide a variety of elements that define an
Competencies organization’s core competency:
• The competency improves/grows with use (i.e. naturally develops along with
the organization).
Prahalad and Hamel suggest that the following three criteria must be satisfied for an
activity to be a core competence:
• The activity must provide a benefit to the end product consumer (i.e. be
strategic to the company in that it delivers value to the customer).
Competitive Competitive advantage is the fostering of core competency to strategically grow the
Advantage business.
Core competencies flow across business units and are not unique to any single
division. For example, a core competency would be a research company having
specialized knowledge in the mathematical theory and applications of statistics to risk
assessment. In this organization, mathematical theory and application of statistics is
not the domain of a specific business unit. There may be a software unit, a corporate
training unit and an education unit all using this same core competency, and perhaps
other core competencies.
Core products are the products arising from the core competency. Suppose the core
competency of the research organization above is deployed in a risk measurement
model for investments. This core product might be sold directly to investment
managers, but the organization may also chose to market the algorithm to other risk
management software providers that sell to investment managers.
End products are the outputs of business units. In the example above this may be the
software sold by the company’s software unit.
From a strategic perspective, organizations must find their core competencies and use
those as drivers for growth and profitability (i.e. to foster their competitive
advantage).
Total Cost of The Ellram article (1993) provides a detailed discussion of the total cost of ownership
Ownership methodology.
The total cost of ownership includes the purchase price, but that is only one of the
costs that should be considered in procuring a product or service. In addition to the
price, there are costs that occur prior to procuring the item and costs that occur after
procuring the item. Total cost of ownership is all these costs combined. Since the
costs before and subsequent to the buy are considered, the costs are often referred to
as the total life cycle costs. These life cycle costs are particularly evident in capital
goods purchases.
Pretransaction Pretransaction costs are all the costs that occur prior to the good or service being
Costs delivered. Typical costs components in the pretransaction phase include:
• Need recognition
• Need description
• Sourcing
• Supplier selection
Within sourcing are costs of finding sources, evaluating them (qualifying) and adding
them to the list of approved suppliers (administrative costs).
Transaction Transaction costs are the costs that occur after supplier selection, and up to the point
Costs the product or service is delivered to the organization. These costs include:
• Ordering
• Monitoring
• Receipt and inspection
• Payment
• Documentation
Ellram specifically notes price as a transaction cost. Price is often a link between pre
transaction and transaction costs as price is typically a major consideration in supplier
selection.
Duties and tariffs also are typically included in price assessment. Ellram is somewhat
unclear with respect to payment and documentation as components of the transaction
cost, nevertheless, these costs are elements of the product or service life cycle costs.
Posttransaction Posttransaction cost analysis is often the most significant contribution that the total
Costs cost of ownership approach adds to procurement decision making. In the previous
review of procurement processes (session 2), the identifiable posttransaction process
was relationship management. Over the life cycle of the product, there are a variety of
additional costs that should be considered:
Many of these post-transaction costs can occur years after the initial acquisition.
Post-transaction costs must be analyzed and quantified. They must reflect actual
expenditures or expected losses. Items that are accounting costs, such as depreciation,
are excluded (i.e. paper-based costs with no real cash outlay).
Total Cost of According to Ellram, total cost of ownership provides the following benefits:
Ownership:
Benefits Performance Measurement
Decision Making
Communication
Total Cost of Implementation of total cost of ownership analysis may be difficult as it has extensive
Ownership: data requirements. Spend analysis may provide a variety of detail for the transaction
Implementation phase but is unlikely to provide pretransaction or posttransaction information. Issues
that must be addressed when moving to a total cost of ownership approach are:
• Refocus: move from simple price analysis to long term cost analysis
• Determination of when to use total cost of ownership, i.e. only for capital
projects, or for all manufacturing components, or for some of both
• Data will need to be developed, stored, and maintained
• Will TCO analysis be rolled out for all applicable situations, or pilot tested
first?
Vendor A can provide the software for $100,000. Billy has checked with other users
of this software and discovered it fails from time to time. His colleagues tell him each
time it fails, which seems to be about 2 times per year, they expect the cost to be about
$20,000 in terms of repairs and loss of goodwill with suppliers. Annual licensing fees
are $20,000. The software is expected to have a life of 5 years at which point it will be
decommissioned. Costs at that point will be $60,000.
Vendor B can provide the software for $250,000. When checking with colleagues at
other organizations he finds this software is considered very reliable, rarely going
down. Annual licensing fees are $30,000 and decommissioning is estimated to be
$25,000. Vendor B’s software is also expected to last 5 years.
Assuminganainterest
Assuming discountraterate of 7.5%
of 7.5% what
what is is the present
the present value of: value of:
Year 0 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Cash $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000
Discount Factor 0.930233 0.865333 0.804961 0.748801 0.696559
1/1.0751 1/1.0752 1/1.0753 1/1.0754 1/1.0755
Discounted Value $9,302 $8,653 $8,050 $7,488 $6,966 $40,459
Year 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Total
Cash $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $250,000
Discount Factor 0.63017
1.086
Discounted Value $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $157,542 $157,542
Total Cost of In both cases, the first years’ licensing fees are included in the initial purchase price.
Ownership: Billy and his team have spent about $100,000 on developing the specification, finding
Discounting sources, qualifying them and reviewing the two bids. The organization uses a discount
Example rate of 7%. Using the total cost approach the analysis is as follows:
(continued)
Time Up to today Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 TOTAL
(or year 0)
Vendor A
Pretransaction $100,000
Transaction $100,000
Posttansaction $40,000 $60,000 $60,000 $60,000 $120,000
Total Cost $200,000 $40,000 $60,000 $60,000 $60,000 $120,000 $540,000
Discount factor 0.9346 0.8734 0.8163 0.7629 0.7130
Discounted value $200,000 $37,383 $52,406 $48,978 $45,774 $85,558 $470,099
Vendor B
Pretransaction $100,000
Transaction $250,000
Posttansaction $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $55,000
Total Cost $350,000 $0 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $55,000 $495,000
Discount factor 0.9346 0.8734 0.8163 0.7629 0.7130
Discounted value $350,000 $0 $26,203 $24,489 $22,887 $39,214 $462,793
Discount Rate 7%
Note that if price were simply the criteria then Vendor A would be selected since the
cost is $100,000 versus $250,000. However when total cost of ownership is used
vendor B proves to be superior, at least at a 7% discount rate.
The discount rate is an important consideration. Suppose the discount rate is 15%.
Then the choice of Vendor A is superior to Vendor B as shown below:
Time Up to today Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 TOTAL
(or year 0)
Vendor A
Pretransaction $100,000
Transaction $100,000
Posttansaction $40,000 $60,000 $60,000 $60,000 $120,000
Total Cost $200,000 $40,000 $60,000 $60,000 $60,000 $120,000 $540,000
Discount factor 0.8696 0.7561 0.6575 0.5718 0.4972
Discounted value $200,000 $34,783 $45,369 $39,451 $34,305 $59,661 $413,569
Vendor B
Pretransaction $100,000
Transaction $250,000
Posttansaction $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $55,000
Total Cost $350,000 $0 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $55,000 $495,000
Discount factor 0.8696 0.7561 0.6575 0.5718 0.4972
Discounted value $350,000 $0 $22,684 $19,725 $17,153 $27,345 $436,907
(In this example an interest rate of about 8.5% is the crossover point).
Review Now that you have examined make or buy analysis, and have recommended a course
Objectives for of action for Happyland Construction, you should review the session’s objectives as
this Session restated here:
Preview Next In session 5 we explored total cost of ownership and the make or buy decision. In
Session session 6, candidates will explore price and cost analysis, and prepare a case report on
Frich Turbo Engine Co.
Activity Directions
Session Overview and Read What You Already Know, the Session Overview and the Objectives
Objectives found in this session.
Objectives and a brief Review the PowerPoint slides for this session (see the Appendix of this
overview of the session. manual. These slides are from the instructor-led version of this module.)
Case Preparation: Frich Prepare for the Frich Turbo Engine case by answering the following
Turbo Engline questions:
Activity Directions
Individual Reflection: Reflect on the following:
Buyer’s Leverage 1. Provide an example of where you have buying leverage, and where
you do not have leverage (at your organization, or elsewhere).
Resource 2. What are the reasons behind the leverage, or non-leverage (i.e. why
- Session notes parties in negotiations/market situations have the advantage, and
why).
Session Notes: Cost Data Read the resources for this section.
and Profit
Here are the key teaching points:
Resources • Analyze the sources of cost data
- Burt, Dobler and • Analyze the types of costs
Starling, World Class • Allow for a “reasonable profit”
Supply Management • “Reasonable profit” is not based on % of cost!
(pages 413-430)
- Session notes
Session Wrap Up Review this session’s objectives. View the topics and activities for the next
session.
What You Price assessment and cost analysis are two key tools in strategic procurement. The
Already Know selling price and the cost of goods are important considerations in total cost of
ownership, and especially in the identification of transactional costs. Thus they are
important elements of the make or buy decision, as explored in session 5.
Overview In this session candidates will explore the mechanisms of pricing and costs. You may
already be searching for a tool that provides a solution to “what is the right price” for a
good or service. The right price has a number of qualitative elements. Also, there are a
number of approaches to assessing price, including cost analysis. A key consideration
in price negotiation is procurement leverage for a given market condition.
Cost analysis is examined in detail in the second half of the session. Approaches to cost
analysis are considered, as are types of costs. The contentious issue of a “correct” level
of profit is reviewed. There is no “correct” answer to what is the right price for a
product or service, and neither is there a “correct” answer to what is the right amount
of profit. To ensure that profit aligns with other strategic procurement goals, the “right”
profit should not be based only on the cost of the product or service.
Framework Framework questions help you focus on the issues presented in the session. Answer
questions the following questions as you complete the readings and activities in this session.
1. With respect to price assessment, which of the following have you used in your
organization: competitive price proposals, current price comparisons, use of web
tools, historical price comparisons and cost analysis?
2. Were there missed opportunities to use one or some of these methods?
3. What types of discounts does your organization typically receive?
4. What are some cases where your organization has procurement leverage? Where
it does not?
5. What sources of cost data has your organization used?
6. When have you been involved in a strategic supply project where direct and
indirect costs have been split?
7. What were some of the problems you faced, if any?
8. Are learning curves appropriate in your organization for some purchases? Why?
This case report is worth 5% of your overall mark for this module. Refer to your
Session Schedule for instructions on submitting this assignment for marking.
The requirements (i.e. the problems to be solved) for the written case report are stated at
the end of the case. Your case report should address these requirements, and present
your analysis, conclusion and recommendations in case report format.
To help you prepare for the report, see the session notes in this session. For further
reference, please see the sample case, Fabritek, 1992, and the sample case report in the
Appendix.
This is a short case related to price and cost analysis. The point of the case is to
consider the differences in costs estimates from different organizations, and why those
estimates may vary. A secondary issue is whether the bids of Bayfleet and Union were
late, and the proper process to deal with late bids (even when they are lower). There is
no “right” answer. Candidates should look beyond the cost information provided in a
bid or quotation to determine the real reasons for the variance in bids among suppliers.
What is the In determining price for a good or service, the rule of thumb is that the price should be
Right Price? “fair and reasonable”. A fair and reasonable price is a price that neither results in an
efficient supplier being put in financial peril, nor results in the buyer paying too much for
the good or service.
The right price is not necessarily the lowest price. In addition to price, other
considerations that relate to the procurement decision include:
• Quality
• Reliability of the supplier
• Terms and conditions (discounts, financing, transportation etc.)
• Risk – supplier, exchange rate, and logistics
At an exchange rate $Cdn 1.15 per $ U.S 1, judging by price alone, the purchase should be
made from the U.S. firm ($US $250 = $Cdn 287.50).
However, there may be hidden logistics issues, for example documentation and clearance
at the US/Canada border. Further there is exchange rate risk. Suppose the Canadian dollar
falls in value to $Cdn 1.22 = $US 1. Then, the paper costs more from Supplier B than
Supplier A.
Therefore these and other factors appropriate to the situation should be considered.
Analysis of Assuming the procured item was submitted for competitive bidding, and that competitive
Competitive bidding was conducted fairly and appropriately, the bids can be compared to one another.
Proposals In some cases, such as government procurement, it is mandated that the lowest bid be
accepted. When lowest price is the requirement, procurement staff should ensure that the
products being supplied are standardized.
For example, Supplier A provides a bid of $10 per unit for automotive gauges, and the
gauges are mount-ready. Supplier B provides a bid of $8 per gauge but the gauges are not
mount-ready. Taking the lower bid in this case may be incorrect if it costs more than $2
during production to make the gauges from supplier B mount-ready. This example
highlights the importance of thoroughness in preparing specifications (see session 2 for a
review of specifications).
Even if bids are identical, other factors should be considered in analyzing the price. Some
questions to consider are:
• Does the selling firm have a history of trying to negotiate price changes?
• Will it help them become more dominant in the market and thereby reduce price
competition for subsequent purchases?
• Is the lowest price supplier reliable, i.e. can they commit to a delivery schedule?
(They may be cheaper in price but delivery delays will adversely affect production
costs.)
Price There are a variety of methods to compare current prices. One method is to compare
Comparisons: current prices to market prices. This is particularly relevant for commodities. For
Current Prices example lumber, gold, oil and grains are traded on commodity markets, where price
levels are highly visible (and highly volatile).
A second approach is to compare with published catalog prices. Catalogs may be widely
available either in paper format or via the internet.
In some cases the prices of goods and services are regulated. Regulated prices are
published and easily accessible.
Price Comparison can be made to previous purchases of similar items. When such
Comparisons: comparisons are made it is useful to understand the dynamics of the industry involved.
Historic Prices
For example, a comparison of diesel fuel prices by a transit agency in 2006 with prices
from 2000 would have limited value, as oil prices are highly volatile, and have been
increasing year over year.
Often it is useful to index historic prices to new levels. Statistics Canada publishes a
variety of indexes which can be used to bring historic prices to current levels.
Using Web A variety of tools are available to make price comparison via the internet. A typical
Tools approach is membership in exchanges, where buyers can see prices from a variety of
suppliers.
Cost Analysis In cost analysis the approach taken is to determine the underlying costs of producing the
good or service, and then determine the profit. A comparison is then made to the quoted
price.
Discounts Suppliers often provide discounts from the quoted price. There are four basic types of
discounts – cash, trade, volume and seasonal discounts.
Cash discounts – are discounts that provide a lower price when prompt payment is made.
Typically they are stated along the lines of “2% 10 days, net 30”. This means a 2%
discount is available if payment is received in ten days; otherwise, the balance is due in 30
days.
Trade Discounts – are discounts made available to a certain trade, profession or industry.
For example, a plumbing company would receive a trade discount from a plumbing
supplier.
Careful analysis should be undertaken when considering trade discounts from distributors.
In some cases, the price, inclusive of discounts, from a distributor may be higher than the
price of obtaining the good directly from the manufacturer when possible. In other cases,
the price may be lower, as the distributor purchases volumes sufficient to obtain lower
prices and higher discounts from the manufacturer.
Discounts Volume Discounts – are discounts for buying a certain quantity of goods or services.
(continued) Volume discounts may occur on a single buy. For example a shirt maker receives a 10%
discount for buying 20,000 buttons or more. Another approach to volume discounts is
when a supplier offers a discount once a certain dollar threshold is reached. For instance,
the shirt manufacturer buys buttons and cloth from the same supplier. The manufacturer
reaches a threshold of $1,000,000 worth of purchases, at which time the supplier provides
a discount of 5%. Volume discounts may also apply over a set time period. Rather than
providing a volume discount applicable to each purchase, the discount threshold may
cover a time period, such as a year.
Seasonal Discounts – are discounts provided during seasonal cycles. For example, a
flaxseed crusher may offer discounts to paint manufacturers to clear out linseed oil
products in inventory prior to the new linseed crop becoming available.
Market Procurement managers need to consider the competitive aspects of the market in which
Conditions and they are dealing when considering price. The degree of competitiveness in markets can
Price range from perfect competition to monopoly. Where there are many competitive
Negotiation suppliers (or price taker markets) the influence of any single supplier is minimal. An
Strength example is the influence an individual farmer would have on wheat prices that a grain
(Procurement mill purchases. Where a monopoly exists there is one supplier. In this case the
Leverage) monopolist has the ability to dictate price arrangements and the purchaser has little
negotiating leverage. . Between these are markets with varying degrees of competition
ranging from monopolistically competitive markets, where branding is prevalent to
differentiate essentially similar products, to oligopolies where it relates a few sellers to a
variety of goods in a given market, and there could then be one, two or three sellers,
depending on the specific good.
Market The following diagram highlights the issue of price negotiation in regards to the number
Conditions and of sellers.
Price
Negotiation Figure 6.1: Procurement Leverage and Sellers
Strength
(Procurement
Leverage,
continued)
Negotiating
leverage
0
Number of Sellers
Similarly the number of potential buyers influences price negotiation leverage. If there
is only one buyer, procurement managers in that buying firm have substantial leverage.
If there are many buyers, procurement managers in any particular firm will have little
leverage.
Negotiating
leverage
0
Number of Buyers
Cost Analysis Cost analysis attempts to determine if the price being charged by the supplier is fair and
reasonable by examining the costs to make the product or service. Cost data can be
obtained in various ways: cost breakdown can be a requirement of a bid where bidding is
used; pricing can be obtained from other firms in the industry or from strategic partners;
or costs can be derived from cost models.
Cost breakdowns – can be required as part of a bid package. Cost breakdown is usually
stated at various quantities supplied. Procurement staff can compare these costs structures
across bids. As well, this becomes important historic documentation for future cost and
price analyses.
Cost Models – the procuring organization can attempt to determine what the costs would
be based on a model of the supplier’s potential costs structure that the procuring
organization develops internally. This model may also use benchmark data.
These are the costs directly related to the production of the product or service. Consider
the provision of an actuarial valuation for a pension fund. The direct costs of service from
a consulting actuarial firm would be the costs of the actuary’s and their assistant’s time,
plus items such as printing the reports and shipping them to the pension fund.
Indirect costs
These are costs that support production and cannot be directly attributed to the particular
product or service (often these are referred to as allocated costs, burden, or overhead). In
the example of the consulting actuarial firm to the pension fund, these costs might include
office space rent, heating, building and liability insurance, and disability plan coverage
(indirect payroll costs). These are allocated to departments, or to an individual product or
service.
Direct Costs Direct costs are usually described in terms of direct labour and direct materials.
Direct labour is the labour used in the physical production of the product or service. For
example, consider the production of a computer. Direct labour is the labour of the
assembly line workers who put the various components (mainboard, optical drives,
memory, and etc.) into the chassis and build the computer.
Direct materials are the materials that are used in the physical production of the product.
In the case of a computer being produced, direct materials include the case, optical drive,
wiring, memory, mainboard, cooling fan, and etc.
Indirect Costs Indirect costs must also be accounted for in the price of a product in order for the
organization to remain viable (i.e. profitable) in the long term.
Indirect cost is usually expressed as a percent of direct labour, and is applied to the
product or service as a per unit cost.
• Indirect costs related to production. For instance, heat in the production plant,
miscellaneous production supplies, and production equipment maintenance. In this
case, the term “labour burden” is sometimes used and it may be shown as a charge per
hour much like the wage rate.
• Indirect costs that are “overhead.” These costs are “corporate” in nature, such as
administration, and are allocated as a percent of all other costs.
Total cost of a computer is $100 in direct labour based on 8 hours of direct labour, and
$200 in direct materials per unit.
The total cost excluding pure overhead and profit would be $380:
Overhead and profit are then added to reach the selling price:
Indirect costs are typically quite “sticky” with respect to different levels of production,
and do not change with production level. For example, a production line may be shut
down due to reduced demand for a firm’s products. Direct labour and direct material
would become 0 during the shutdown. However, costs such as insurance, heating and rent
would not decrease, and, in any case, would never reach 0.
With fixed costs, the effect on per unit cost decreases the greater the number of units
produced. This is an important consideration in costs analysis, since a large order would
be expected to have a lower per unit cost than a small order.
Profit What is the right level of profit that should be provided to the supplier when a purchase is
made? There is no correct answer to this question, as the right amount of profit is
contingent on a variety of factors. These include:
• The competitiveness of the industry in which the supplier operates. The more
competitive the more likely that profits are lower.
• The size of the order. (On a per unit basis the profit per unit can be lower the
larger the order).
• The greater the risk related to supplying the product or service, the greater the
profit.
Profit should not be calculated on a percent of cost basis. The problem with this approach
is that an organization that is inefficient is rewarded for that inefficiency. Furthermore, the
use of the percent of cost approach is a disincentive to improve efficiency once the
purchase has been made. This is at odds with goals of long term supply relationships (to
be reviewed later in this module).
Learning In the production of goods and services, worker skill improves with the number of
Curves repetitions. The effect is a decrease in the time per unit of output. In the case of an
actuary, it may take quite a while to produce the first pension valuation report. On the
second valuation report, the time required would decrease, and so on. Similarly for a
worker installing optical drives in a computer, as the worker installs more drives, the time
to install a drive decreases. This concept is called a learning curve.
For cost analysis, learning curves are used to determine the effect of higher units of
production on the direct labour costs. As the level of production rises the cost per unit
should decrease. This should be reflected in the cost analysis.
Review Now that you have examined price and cost decisions, and have recommended a
Objectives for course of action for Frich Turbo Engine, you should review the session’s objectives as
this Session restated here:
Preview Next In session 6 we analyzed price and cost decisions. In session 7, candidates will
Session explore quality and inventory issues, and do an exercise on ISO 9001:2000 and their
organization.
What You We have already explored price and cost in session 6. This session discusses quality,
Already Know and completes our exploration of the cost, price and quality triangle. The importance
of quality in the triangle is that price or cost should not be considered in isolation from
quality. For example, price and quality should be considered simultaneously when
determining the value provided to the ultimate customer.
Overview In this session a third dimension is added to the procurement decision: quality. The
session begins with a look at the factors that procurement influences that affect quality.
Then, we review some common total quality management system: Deming’s, Six
Sigma and ISO. Then we consider the importance of quality management training for
procurement staff.
The second part of the session focuses on inventory. Customer perception of value is
influenced by their ability to acquire the desired good or service when they want and
need it. Inventory is often the key factor in meeting this requirement. The reasons for
holding inventory are considered as are some common inventory models. Order size
decisions are often based on these inventory models. When deploying models such as
these, it is important to consider the relationship between delivery time and inventory
level, as well as the relationship between inventory level and customer service.
Stuart, F. Ian and Mueller, P. Jr. Total Quality Management and Supplier
Partnerships: A Case Study. International Journal of Purchasing and Materials
Management. Winter, 1994, Pages 14-20.
Genna, Albert. How do you find the right quality wavelength? Purchasing. Jan 16,
1997. Pages 45-46.
Placido Engine Company case. Burt Dobler and Starling. World Class Supply
Management, accompanying material.
Framework Framework questions help you focus on the issues presented in the session. Answer
Questions the following questions as you complete the readings and activities in this session.
To help you prepare the case, see the framework questions on the case in this session.
For further reference, please see Case Preparation in Introduction and Overview.
This activity is not submitted for evaluation. When you have completed the activity,
see the Self-Evaluation section in this session.
Refer to your Session Schedule for instructions on submitting this assignment for
marking.
1. Outline four reasons for your organization to become ISO 9001:2000 certified. If
ISO 9001:2000 is not applicable to your organization, outline four reasons that one of
your main suppliers should become ISO 9001:2000 certified. Provide a rationale for
each of the reasons you have outlined.
3. Assuming you are responsible for the implementation, describe how you would
proceed through the certification steps.
For more details on the characteristics and purpose of ISO 9001:2000 certification,
refer to the session notes and readings for this session.
• Did you analyze your organization, or your supplier’s organization, and relate it to
the requirements and framework of ISO 9001:2000?
• Was the analysis realistic and compelling?
Overview The objective of the Placido Engine case is to explore building in quality, as opposed to
inspecting quality in. Focus on determining and implementing the methods required to
deal with quality problems.
As in most case studies, there is no “right answer.” The following information and
questions should help you decide what you would do if you were responsible for this
situation.
Basic Issues The obvious basic issue in the case is the corrosion of the castings. However, this case
is about much more. For instance:
• Penson’s approach to dealing with the problem. Is a formal response the right
approach?
• Perhaps a less formal approach followed up with a formal ‘change request’
would be better.
• Does the supplier unilaterally have the right to change the specification, as
Penson attempts to do?
• The working relationship between Placido and the suppliers seems quite distant.
Given the importance of quality, is this appropriate?
Relationship Ask yourself how you would have responded if you were a supplier and had received
Placido Has Penson’s letter.
with its
Suppliers Placido has been heavy handed in dealing with suppliers, and, judging by the suppliers’
responses, the organization may have damaged the relationships.
How Could The case provides some information on the quality process at Placido: they inspect
Placido quality into the product. When inbound goods are unsatisfactory they appear to fix them
Improve in order to preserve the production schedule.
Quality?
Ask yourself why they use inspection. What are the pros and cons of fixing supplies
that do not comply with standards? Rather than fixing the castings, what are the other
alternatives? (Hint: is Placido is the author of its own problems by fixing the castings?)
Consider alternate methods that Placido could have used. These might include:
Factors That Four factors are typically considered with respect to the long run quality of supplies.
Effect Long Run These are:
Quality
• Specification quality
• Selecting suppliers that have the expertise to deliver the right quality
• Supplier understanding of the quality requirements, and supplier motivation to
deliver the required quality
• Monitoring supplier performance
Specification Procurement must work closely with the users of the supply to properly describe, i.e.
Quality specify, the quality required. The quality specified must suit the ultimate customer’s
requirements. Burt, Dobler and Starling suggest there are three ways that quality can
be specified:
Selecting Two typical approaches to considering quality aspects when selecting suppliers are
Suppliers product testing and proposal analysis.
Supplier Monitoring suppliers ensures that the goods and services received continue to meet
Monitoring the desired quality requirements.
Total Quality There are several definitions of total quality management. Stuart and Mueller define
Management total quality management as “a system of management that has the customer
satisfaction as its primary business goal”. Other authors suggest that TQM means an
organization should manage every job and every process so that it is carried out right
the first time. Others suggest TQM focus on continuous improvement.
Deming’s Total quality management focuses on defect prevention. A variety of methods have
Approach been adopted to implement TQM. A classic method is Dr. W. Edwards Deming’s.
Deming outlines 14 points to better quality:
Six Sigma A newer approach is Six Sigma. The name Six Sigma refers to six deviations from the
Approach mean as a statistical measure for error prevention. (Deviation is expressed
mathematically as the Greek symbol for sigma: σ.)
1. Customer focused
2. Fact based
3. Process oriented
4. Management is proactive
5. Collaboration is required
6. Focused on perfection / taking risks is necessary / failures are expected
ISO 9001:2000 Many companies use the International Standards Organization (ISO) quality
designation ISO 9001:2000. The designation covers processes used within the
organization, and does not apply to a specific product of the organization. The ISO
organization does not certify organizations. Certification is provided by third party
certifying and registering entities. For example, a printing company may choose to
use ISO quality standards. The standards would apply to its management processes,
and not to the papers it produces. When the printing company is certified, it can
represent itself as ISO 9001:2000 compliant, but not its products.
1. Focus on customers
2. Provide leadership
3. Involve your people
4. Use a process approach (to manage activities and resources)
5. Take a systems approach (to manage the organization)
6. Encourage continual improvement
7. Get the facts before you decide
8. Work with your suppliers (for mutual benefit)
ISO 9001:2000 ISO outlines a generic methodology to meeting the ISO 9001:2000 standards. The
Methodology steps are as follows:
ISO 9001:2000 Apply the ISO 9000 family of standards in your management system
Step 4
If you are seeking certification, or if you are applying for a national quality award,
your quality management system should be in conformance with ISO 9001:2000.
ISO 9001:2000 Obtain guidance on specific topics within the quality management system
Step 5
These topic-specific standards are:
ISO 9001:2000 Establish your current status, and determine the gaps between your quality
Step 6 management system and the requirements of ISO 9001:2000
ISO 9001:2000 Determine the processes that are needed to supply products to your customers
Step 7
Review the requirements of the ISO 9001:2000 section on Product Realization to
determine how they apply or do not apply to your quality management system. The
processes to be reviewed include:
ISO 9001:2000 Develop a plan to close the gaps in step 6 and to develop the processes in step 7
Step 8
Identify actions needed to close the gaps. Allocate resources to perform these actions.
Assign responsibilities and establish a schedule to complete the needed actions. (ISO
9001:2000 Paragraphs 4.1 and 7.1 provide the information you will need to consider
when developing the plan.)
You may want to, or be required to show conformance (i.e. ISO certification and
registration) for various purposes, for example:
• Contractual requirements
• Market reasons or customer preference
• Regulatory requirements
• Risk management
• To set a clear goal for your internal quality development (motivation)
Review the effectiveness and suitability of your quality management system. ISO
9004:2000 provides a methodology for improvement.
Quality Training A significant issue related to quality and procurement is TQM (Total Quality
for Procurement Management) training for procurement staff. In many organizations TQM is part of
Staff the culture, and training in TQM systems for procurement staff is expected and
planned. In organizations where TQM is not part of the culture, or where the
procurement staff does not have access to training, there are several issues. The
article by Genna addresses quality training for procurement staff. In the article,
Genna makes the following observations and suggestions:
• Quality training of procurement staff will reduce error rates, and thereby
improve the bottom line.
• With training, procurement can effectively convey the expected quality
standards to suppliers.
• If procurement initiates its own training program, it is likely to be more
effective in creating a culture of quality management within procurement.
• The more formal the training program is, the more likely it will be effective.
• The program may be extended to suppliers as part of a supplier development
program.
• It is more difficult to implement TQM in organizations where procurement is
decentralized than where it is centralized; however, there are approaches that
will work.
• For small companies, an in-house training program is likely not cost effective;
however, procurement staff can benefit from third party courses that focus on
quality management from a procurement point of view.
Forecasting Forecasting demand is a complex task. You might start with asking these six basic
Demand questions:
• What is the purpose of the inventory? This determines the level of effort required
to forecast demand. If the forecast is for a high value item subject to substantial
fluctuation, significant effort should be spent in determining demand.
• What is the time horizon: short, medium or long? The longer the time horizon the
greater the expected forecast error.
• What techniques should be used, qualitative or quantitative?
• What data is the basis of the forecast? If the historical data used is inaccurate, the
forecast will be inaccurate. If the purpose of the forecast is critical to the
organization, significant effort should be spent on assuring the data is accurate.
• How will the forecast be presented?
• How accurate was the forecasted demand? Monitoring and feedback are required
to improve future forecasts.
Qualitative The qualitative approach to forecasting demand relies on factors such as the
Approach to predictions of internal and external experts, and customer feedback methods such as
Forecasting surveys and testing.
One approach to qualitative forecasting is the Delphi method. In this method, different
experts are asked to provide forecasts, and the average of these forecasts is used.
Where there are significant differences in the forecasts, a feedback loop is used. The
experts are contacted about the divergence, and asked to explain how and why their
forecast differs significantly.
Quantitative Quantitative approaches usually involve the use of historical data (often described as
Approach to time series data). There are a variety of methods for using historical data, and these
Forecasting methods have different levels of sophistication.
Inventory Models Inventory models are designed to determine the size of an order. There are three
fundamental types of models:
• Ordering : 1 day
• Production: 3 days
• Ocean shipping to Canada: 15 days
• Unloading and shipment to Winnipeg: 5 days
• Receipt and inspection at plant: 3 days
• Average daily request: 60 pumps per day
Suppose that the procurement group institutes a program to reduce delays in at the
plant. The result is the pumps spend only 1 day for receiving and inspection.
Economic Order The economic order quantity model is more sophisticated and attempts to balance
Quantity order (or acquisition) costs versus carrying costs of inventory.
Example
Suppose for the farm equipment manufacture in Winnipeg that it costs $400 per order
for pumps, the costs of financing inventory is 7%, and each pump is $500.
Annual demand is 15,660 pumps. (60x261 working days)
Therefore,
2DS / CI = 357,943
EQO = √2 x D x 2
CxI
Every time the fixed order point is reached, 598 pumps are ordered. Notice that the
simple EOQ model does not consider additional factors such as shipment times.
Periodic Review The previous inventory models are based on reordering at a point that inventory
Models reaches a certain level. In the periodic review model, order points are time based. At
each review a quantity is ordered to bring the inventory up to the desired level. The
order amount is dependent on the time period of the review.
The desired (or maximum) level of inventory is determined based on the following
formula:
M = W (T+L)+S
Where:
In our example, the farm equipment manufacturer’s review period is 30 days, with a
desired safety stock of 300 pumps.
Using the periodic review formula, the desired inventory level is:
Every 30 days the manufacturer would review the inventory and top it up to 3,960
pumps.
Similar to the first example if the lead time decreased to 29 days there would be an
affect on inventory. In this case the desired inventory level would be:
Inventory There are two important relationships to consider with respect to inventory. Delivery
Relationships lead time and customer service.
In the fixed order quantity and periodic review models, as delivery time increases so
does the required levels of inventory:
High
Level of
Inventory
Low
Short Long
Similarly, the ability to provide reliable customer service is related to inventory. The
greater the desired level of service the greater the required inventory:
High
Level of
Inventory
Low
Low High
Desired level of customer service
Review Now that you have examined quality and inventory issues, and have recommended an
Objectives for implementation plan for ISO 9001:2000, you should review the session’s objectives as
this Session restated here:
Preview Next In session 7 we examined quality and inventory issues. In session 8, candidates will
Session explore methods for selecting suppliers. Candidates will also perform an exercise on
supplier evaluation, and submit a written case report.
Supplier Selection
Activity Directions
Session Overview and Read What You Already Know, the Session Overview and the Objectives
Objectives found in this session.
Objectives and a brief Review the PowerPoint slides for this session (see the Appendix of this
overview of the session. manual. These slides are from the instructor-led version of this module.)
Individual Reflection: Develop a list of the potential sources to find suppliers. How do you
Sources of Suppliers currently find them? Should you expand your search? If so, where would
you start?
Resource:
- Session notes Here are the key teaching points:
• There are many possible sources to find suppliers.
• Find some experts at your organization, or outside your organization,
to help you develop more resources.
Individual Exercise: Un- Read the requirements and complete the exercise in this session.
weighted Supplier
Evaluation Matrix for Submit the exercise for evaluation. Refer to the Session Schedule
Platinum Box provided for submission instructions.
(marked – 5%)
Activity Directions
Session Notes: Type of Read the resources for this section.
Product and Supplier
Selection Here are the key teaching points:
• Note the importance of the type of product in supplier selection
Resources: methods.
- Wilson article: The • Review and understand the components of the total costs approach.
Relative Importance of
Supplier Selection.
- Smytka article: Total Cost
Supplier Selection: A Case
Study.
- Session Notes
Session Notes: Single vs. Read the resources for this section.
Multiple Sourcing
Here are the key teaching points:
Resources: • Note the arguments in favour of single sourcing.
- Burt Dobler and Starling, • Note the arguments in favour of multiple sourcing.
World Class Supply • Review the concept of the right number of suppliers (supplier
Management (p. 342-343) optimization).
- Cruz article: Purchasing
Pros Search for the perfect
number of suppliers.
- Session notes
Activity Directions
Individual Case Report: Analyze the case using the Case Preparation method described in the
Platinum Box Introduction and Overview.
(marked – 5%)
Prepare the case report according to the instructions in this session. Also,
Resources: use the guidelines in the Written Case Reports section of the
− Platinum Box case Introduction and Overview.
− Introduction and
Overview: Written Submit the case report for evaluation. Refer to the Session Schedule for
Case Reports (report submission instructions.
guidelines)
− Session notes in this Key teaching points:
session • Pay close attention to the total costs, and all the information provided
− Framework questions in for evaluating the suppliers.
this session • Present your analysis and conclusions in case report format.
− Required readings for
this session
− Fabritek, 1992 Sample
Case and Report
(Appendix)
Session Wrap Up Review this session’s objectives. View the topics and activities for the
next session.
Supplier Selection
What You Session 2 mentioned key procurement processes: sourcing and supplier selection. In
Already Know this session the supplier selection process is more fully developed. One approach
discussed is the common evaluative matrix approach. Another is the total cost
approach. The total cost approach builds on the total cost of ownership concept
discussed in session 5.
Overview This session considers two general models for supplier selection. The common
evaluative matrix model is discussed. Un-weighted and weighted evaluation matrices
are discussed, and activities reinforce understanding of these models.
Type of product is a key evaluative factor in the evaluative matrix model. Evaluative
criteria and their importance may differ depending on the type of product. Total cost of
ownership forms a basis for evaluating criteria; however, risk factors and desirable
characteristics of suppliers are also considered.
Supplier selection also involves deciding how many suppliers are appropriate for a
particular good or service. Single sourcing and multiple sourcing are reviewed.
Smytka, Daniel L and Clemens, Michael W. Total Cost Supplier Selection: A Case
Study. International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management. Winter, 1993,
Pages 42-49.
Cruz, Clarissa. Purchasing Pros Search for the perfect number of suppliers.
Purchasing. July 11, 1996, Pages 28 and 29.
Platinum Box case. Satayas Consulting. Copyright © 2007 Allister Hickson, Ph.D.
Reprinted with permission.
Framework Framework questions help you focus on the issues presented in the session. Answer
Questions the following questions as you complete the readings and activities in this session.
Refer to your Session Schedule for instructions on submitting this assignment for
marking.
1. Refer to the Platinum Box case and the session notes. Develop an un-weighted
evaluation matrix for each of the possible press selections in the case.
2. Rank each of the printing presses in the case according to each evaluative factor
you have chosen (i.e. complete the un-weighted evaluation matrix).
For more details on supplier selection and evaluation, refer to the session notes and
readings for this session.
• Did you analyze all your options? Did you provide realistic factors and rankings?
Did you complete your un-weighted evaluation matrix?
• Was the analysis realistic and compelling?
• Were the recommendations realistic, given the organization’s resources and
capabilities?
This case report is worth 5% of your overall mark for this module. Refer to your
Session Schedule for instructions on submitting this assignment for marking.
The requirement for the written case report is: as Jared John, write a report stating the
issues, criteria, analysis and plan of action (i.e. recommendations) to the board of
Platinum Box re: which press to use. Here are some things to consider in preparing
your report:
1. Should Platinum Box use single or multiple sources? Why, or why not?
2. If they continued to single source with JabaKing, what would the effect be on
their negotiating position?
3. What type of product is the new printing press?
4. Develop a list of evaluative factors, rankings, and weighting for each of the
options.
5. Make the supplier selection for Platinum Box using the total cost framework.
6. Remember to put yourself in the role of Jared John, and make your
recommendation(s) realistic.
To help you prepare for the report, see the session notes in this session. For further
reference, please see the sample case, Fabritek, 1992, and the sample case report in the
Appendix.
Supplier Once potential suppliers for a good or service have been identified, a supplier (or
Selection: Un- suppliers) needs to be selected. The most common model of supplier selection is to
Weighted use an evaluation matrix. When using an evaluation approach the procurement team
Evaluation (or the cross functional procurement team) should use the following general steps:
Systems
• Identify the important evaluative factors.
• Determine the range for the rating scale (example 1 to 5, or 1 to 10, etc.).
FIRM: A B C
Criteria
Number of engineers
5 = >15 5
4 = 10-15 4
3 = 7-9
2 = 4-6 2
1 = 1-3
Related Experience
5 = worked with firm before, no issues 5
4 = worked with firm before, some issues
3 = firm has a lot of similar work, no issues 3
2 = firm has a lot of similar work, some issues 2
1 = firm has done a bit of similar work
Manufacturing facilities
5 = Firm has up to date tools and techniques
4 = Firm has about 75% up to date tools and techniques 4
3 = Firm has about 50% up to date tools and techniques 3 3
2 = Firm has about 25% up to date tools and techniques
1 = Firm has about 10% up to date tools and techniques
Financial Strength
5 = Firm has a very positive financial outlook 5
4 = Firm has a positive financial outlook
3 = Firm has an average financial outlook 3 3
2 = Firm has a below average financial outlook
1 = Firm is financially weak
Weighted The simple un-weighted evaluation matrix approach does not consider that certain
Evaluation evaluative factors may be more important than other evaluative factors. Also, the
finance members of the team may consider financial strength more important than
manufacturing facilities. The production members of the team might consider
manufacturing facilities more important than financial strength. Since the evaluative
factors may have different levels of importance, a weighted evaluative matrix is
typically used. The steps in the process are as follows:
• Determine the range for the rating scale (example 1 to 5, or 1 to 10, etc.).
Weighted In this example, the members of a team reach the following consensus for evaluative
Evaluation factors, as shown in Table 2 below:
Matrix: An
Example Table 2
Rankings
FIRM: A B C
Criteria
The Wilson article shows that evaluative factors differ by product type. It also shows
that the importance of factors within product types change over time.
Routine Order The importance of evaluative factors in routine order products has changed over the
Products years:
• In 1974, quality was the second least important consideration. By 1993 it had
become the most important factor.
• In 1974 delivery was the most important factor. By 1992 it had become the least
important factor.
• In 1974 service was the least important factor and remained that way up to 1982.
Service increased marginally between 1982 and 1993.
• Price remained the second most important factor throughout the time periods.
Procedural The importance of evaluative factors in procedural problem products has also changed
Problem over the years:
Products • In 1974 and 1982 service was the least important factor. In 1993 it was the most
important factor.
• Conversely, delivery was the most important factor in 1974 and 1982. It became
the least important factor in 1993.
• Quality increased in importance from 1982 to 1993
• Price decreased in importance during the same time period.
Performance The importance of evaluative factors in performance problem products has also
Problem changed over the years:
Products • Quality became the most important consideration for performance problem
products in 1992 increasing from a third place ranking.
• Delivery decreased from being the most important in 1974, to the least important
in 1993.
• Service also increased in importance over the years.
• Price was largely unchanged throughout the years.
Political Problem And finally, the importance of evaluative factors in political problem products has
Products also changed over the years:
• Price decreased from the most important factor in 1974 and 1982 to the least
important factor in 1993.
• Quality became the most important factor in 1993, rising from the second least
important factor in 1972.
• Delivery became slightly less important over the years.
• Service increased, from being the least important to the second most important.
Supplier Smytka and Clemens (1993) describe a total cost approach to supplier selection using
Selection: the model developed by General Electric Wiring Devices (GEWD). In addition to
GEWD’s Total quantifiable total costs, the GEWD model employs an initial qualitative assessment
Cost Approach relating to risk factors and business desirable factors.
In applying GEWD’s total cost model, the first step is to evaluate qualitative risk
factors. If the supplier passes the risk analysis, the supplier undergoes a qualitative
assessment of business desirable factors. If the supplier passes the business desirable
factors analysis, they undergo the total cost quantitative assessment.
• Enumerate total costs (quantitative analysis- involves adding the result for
each potential supplier)
Step 1: Risk In the first step of the GEWD model, the team performs a risk assessment on the
Factors Level supplier. The following risk factors can be considered:
• Financial stability
• Labour contract matters
• Environmental issues
• Quality
• Product line fit
• Warranties
• Proprietary design
• Supplier visits
• Awareness of market conditions
• Capacity constraints
• Effect on supplier research
Each factor is rated as pass or fail (go, or no-go). If there is an overall fail, then the
supplier is excluded. If there is an overall pass, proceed to the next steps. Then this
step is repeated for each potential supplier.
Step 2: Business Business desirable factors are factors that are important in the buyer’s strategy but are
Desirable Factors not quantifiable. A list of factors for consideration are:
Level
• Delivery capability
• Productivity
• Quality and quality systems
• Other capabilities
Step 3: Total This total cost analysis is described differently than the total cost of ownership method in
Cost Analysis session 5 (Make or Buy). It is important to note that any total cost analysis should include
pre and post transaction costs. (The risk analysis layer of this method for supplier
selection is equivalent to qualifying suppliers as described in session 5.)
Using the total cost of ownership approach introduced in session 5, we can derive a total
cost analysis for supplier selection (items in italics are the cost items from the Smytka and
Clemens article, and are fit within the total cost of ownership framework):
Pretransaction
• Need recognition
• Need description
• Sourcing
Supplier visits
• Supplier selection
Transaction
• Ordering
Price with Discounts
Ordering costs
Transportation
• Monitoring
Delivery expediting
• Receipt and Inspection
Technical support (inspection mainly)
Non conformance (quality)
• Payment
• Documentation
Post transaction
• Relationship costs with the supplier
Supplier visits
• Maintenance costs
• Repair costs
• Lost production costs
Line down costs
• Customer goodwill costs
Inventory costs
Line down costs
• Decommissioning and disposal costs
After suppliers pass the risk assessment, all the factors (risk, business desirable
factors, and total cost) are considered in order to reach a decision.
The lowest total costs do not necessarily trump other factors. For example, a supplier
may have the lowest total costs, but have a higher risk assessment consequently the
supplier is ruled out. Or, suppliers could have about the same total costs, but one
supplier has better business desirable factors.
Single vs. A significant strategic decision for procurement is when to single or multiple source a
Multiple good or service.
Sourcing
Single sourcing provides the opportunity to establish a tight relationship with a
preferred supplier. Some reasons for single sourcing are:
Multiple sourcing results in less tight relationships with suppliers. Some reasons for
multiple sourcing are:
Determining the Somewhere within the continuum from one supplier to multiple suppliers lies the
Perfect Number optimal number of suppliers for a particular good or service. The Cruz (1996) article
of Suppliers addresses supplier optimization, and some of the things an organization should
consider:
Advocates of supplier optimization suggest instead that these problems arise from
inadequate management of supplier optimization programs, which may focus on
supplier numbers and fail to promote collaborative partnerships with suppliers.
Cruz indicates that only 54% of organizations who use supplier optimization
experience cost reductions. For those who were successful, the key is collaboration
between procurement and engineering (design). Among organizations who have
established supplier optimization programs, the common requirement is supplier
evaluation.
Review Now that you have examined supplier selection in detail, and have recommended a
Objectives for course of action for Platinum Box, you should review the session’s objectives as
this Session restated here:
Preview Next In session 8 we analyzed methods for evaluating suppliers. In session 9, candidates
Session will explore the development and certification of suppliers, and do activities on
supplier certification and supplier development.
Activity Directions
Session Overview and Read What You Already Know, the Session Overview and the Objectives
Objectives found in this session.
Objectives and a brief overview Review the PowerPoint slides for this session (see the Appendix of this
of the session. manual. These slides are from the instructor-led version of this module.)
Activity Directons
Session Notes: Supplier Read the resources for this section.
Certification
Here are the key teaching points:
Resources: • Review objectives and benefits of certification.
- Lockhart: Vendor • Review steps to supplier certification.
Certification: Seven Steps to
a Better Product
- Park: Impact of Supplier
Certification Program on
U.S. Firms
- Session notes
Individual Exercise: Read the requirements and complete the exercise in this session.
Supplier Certification
(marked – 5%) Submit the exercise for evaluation. Refer to the Session Schedule
provided for submission instructions.
Activity Directions
Self-assessment Activity: Prepare the Fisher and Paykel case by answering the following questions:
Fisher and Paykel case • Is this an attractive contract for Walton?
• What supplier development activities would you recommend in this
case?
Resources: • How do you think Walton will respond?
- Fisher and Paykel case • If Walton does not agree then what should Fisher and Paykel do?
- Session notes
Here are the key teaching points:
• There is more than one choice of development activities.
• Suppliers may or may not agree to supplier development.
• If supplier does not agree, propose an alternate plan.
Self-assessment Activity When you are finished the self-assessment activity, review the Self-
Evaluation assessment Activity Evaluation section in this session.
Session Wrap Up Review this session’s objectives. View the topics and activities for the
next session.
What You In the last session, the focus was on selecting suppliers and determining the correct
Already Know number of suppliers. Before that, we examined delivery and quality. This session
assumes suppliers have been selected, and addresses how to develop and certify
suppliers. Quality and delivery are important reasons to consider supplier development.
A natural outcome of supplier development and certification is the reduction of the
supply base. The focus shifts towards closer relationships with existing supply
partners.
Park, Hong Y., Reddy, S., C. Shin, G.-C. and Eckerle, C., Impact of Supplier
Certification Program on U.S. Firms. European Journal of Purchasing and Supply
Management. Volume 2, 1996. Pages 107-118.
Sharland, Alex, Eltantawy, Reham, A. and Giunpero, Larry C. The Impact of Cycle
Time on Supplier Selection and Subsequent Performance Outcomes. Journal of
Supply Chain Management. Summer, 2003. Pages 4-12.
Fisher and Paykel Limited case. Richard Ivey School of Business #9A97D015.
Framework Framework questions help you focus on the issues presented in the session. Answer
Questions the following questions as you complete the readings and activities in this session.
Self-assessment Prepare the Fisher and Paykel Ltd. case by focusing on the following issues:
Activity • What are the basic issues in this case?
(not marked) • What do you think of the relationships within Fisher and Paykel, and the
relationships the organization has with its suppliers?
• How can Alan Day solve the immediate problems?
To help you prepare the case, see the framework questions on the case in this session.
For further reference, please see Case Preparation in Introduction and Overview.
This activity is not submitted for evaluation. When you have completed the activity,
see the Self-Evaluation section in this session.
Refer to your Session Schedule for instructions on submitting this assignment for
marking.
Requirements:
• Select one supplier from your organization that you have determined is a good
candidate to undergo certification. Provide a brief explanation as to why you chose
this supplier for certification.
• Prepare a brief summary for how you would apply each of the steps in the
certification process to this supplier.
• Prepare a short written report of your findings.
Overview The Fisher and Paykel case is used to illustrate inventory tradeoffs. Focus on
development of the supplier, potential reactions of the supplier and potential
consequences.
Recommended This case begs for an improvement in inventory management procedures, both at F&P
Supplier and Walton. The group approach that Alan Day has adopted is desirable. There are
Development thirteen supplier development activities discussed in the session:
Activities
1. Feedback on evaluations
2. Supplier visits at the buying organization
3. Supplier site visits
4. Verbal or written requests for improvement
5. Promising future benefits
6. Formal evaluation
7. Creating competition amongst suppliers
8. Informal supplier evaluation.
9. Promising current benefits
10. Certification
11. Recognition of supplier achievements
12. Training and education of suppliers
13. Investment in suppliers
Suggested The key supplier development activities to focus on are 2, 3, 10, 11 and 12 (2 and 3 are
Approach already in place, it seems.)
The focus should gravitate towards certification and training and education. These are
important because they create a path for F&P and Walton to become more closely
aligned in meeting their common goals.
Recommend the use of JIT to solve the problems of shortages. JIT is covered more fully
in session 12.
Note that F&P and Walton have a good working relationship, which is evident by the
composition and openness of the team Alan Day has assembled.
How Will Given the openness of the relationship it can be expected that Walton will respond
Walton favorably to positive approaches to supplier development.
Respond?
Go through the list of potential activities, and determine what the expected response
from Walton will be to each.
In general candidates should be aware that the F&P and Walton supply issue is a joint
problem. Consequently, development activities that focus on Walton solely will result
in a negative response. Those that focus on joint activities are likely to have a positive
response. These will also result in a more secure long term relationship.
If Walton Does If Walton does not agree to supplier development type activities, which is unlikely given
Not Agree the importance of the F&P contract, there are four possible approaches for Alan Day to
take:
1. Do nothing.
2. Improve the current system: In this alternative Walton is retained as the supplier
and practices are improved. Come up with possible improvements. Potential
solutions are better inventory control practices, greater information sharing
between F&P and Walton with respect to demand, and changes in F&P
production schedules.
3. Find another supplier. There is only one supplier (Walton in New Zealand). It
may be possible to encourage another supplier to move into this business.
Comment on the consequences of this, especially in a small place like New
Zealand. Another possibility is to source offshore. This however, would have
significant additional effects on inventory, which F&P does not have room for,
as well as costs due to transportation.
4. Produce in house. In this scenario F&P would acquire the machinery to cut the
holes in house. There are several issues with this. First, it moves F&P further
away from their core competencies, second the machine will likely be idle a
significant part of the time, finally it may have an undesirable effect on Walton.
Procurement Carter, Monczka and Mosconi (2005) provide a process-oriented framework for
Performance strategic supply performance monitoring. According to the article, there are eight
Monitoring: elements that constitute best practices in procurement performance monitoring:
Eight Best
Practices • Align procurement measures with corporate goals
• Establish comprehensive measures
• Set aggressive but dynamic targets
• Make the measures transparent and known
• Link them to performance-based incentive systems
• Provide the necessary resources to succeed
• Provide systems to support the measures
• Provide leadership
Procurement Using this framework, various types of measures can be deployed. The types of
Performance measures are as follows:
Monitoring
Measures • Price/cost
• Revenue
• Inventory
• Availability
• Technology, innovation and new product or process introduction
• Quality
• Workforce
• Operational
• Customer satisfaction
• Supplier
Cost reduction
These measures usually compare current prices with the prices paid on previous
purchases. An important consideration is that market prices (particularly for
commodities) will affect the calculation of cost changes. Issues include: ensuring that
quantities used to measure the cost reduction are consistent, and that procurement
adjusts for the effect of cost increases, and that procurement applies What You
Already Know cost reductions to the factors responsible for the cost reduction.
These measures are used for products where there is a well functioning market. A
comparison is made between the relative change in market cost of the good or service
and the change in the organization’s cost for the equivalent good or service. There are
two issues with this approach: the cost of building and maintaining the internal
indices, and finding a comparable basket of goods and/or services.
Cost avoidance
These measures are designed to consider what would have happened if procurement
had not taken action.
Guidelines for The Carter (2005) article suggests the following guidelines for target pricing and cost
Target and Cost reduction measures.
Reduction
Measures Target Pricing Guidelines
Revenue The Carter (2005) article identifies three issues with using revenue measures:
Measures
• Revenue generation is a non-traditional view of procurement’s strategic role
• Be sure to define the effect that procurement has on revenue generation
• Account for the multiple organizational entities involved in revenue
generation, and how this relates to procurement’s role
Inventory The greatest issue in terms of performance monitoring is a focus on singular measures
Measures of performance where multiple measures of performance are required.
Availability Availability measures expand beyond simple inventory measures. The focus is on
Measures assuring the good or service is available to the customer at the right time, in the right
quantity with the right quality. The most significant problem is handling changes in
the timing and quantity demanded by the customer.
Technology The critical issue here is measuring the effect of technology or process
Measures implementation. Tracking systems are important to determine results. As well, in
order to convince suppliers to focus attention on the need for innovation, the buying
company must focus on innovation and push innovation through to the vendor.
Technology and process improvement measures are difficult to implement.
Quality Measures Quantitative measures determine the degree of conformance or defects in goods and
services.
User surveys ask users of products their opinions of the quality of goods and services.
Quality system certification was discussed in the total quality management section
of session 7.
Operational Operational measures focus on the efficiency of the procurement area as well as the
Measures degree of internal compliance with company policy. The major issue with these
measures is politically-motivated performance compliance. As only a limited number
of measures can be implemented, departments will optimize their performance with
respect to those measures. This may mean poor performance in areas which are not
subject to measurement.
Customer Measures of internal and external customer satisfaction may be used. These may
Satisfaction consist of surveys, measures of return rates, and etc.
Measures
Supplier Supplier performance measures focus on how well the supplier performed related to
Measures the good or service being acquired. We will explore this topic in more depth in this
session.
Approaches to Krause (1997) defines supplier development as any effort of a firm to increase the
Supplier performance and/or capabilities to meet the firm’s short and long term supply needs.
Development Supplier development effort can range from piece-meal, to fully-integrated long term
relationship with the supplier. Forms of development activities ranked in terms of
frequency 1are:
• Feedback on evaluations
• Supplier visits to the buying organization
• Supplier site visits
• Verbal or written requests for improvement
• Promising future benefits
• Formal evaluation
• Creating competition amongst suppliers
• Informal supplier evaluation
• Promising current benefits
• Certification
• Recognition of supplier achievements
• Training and education of suppliers
• Investment in suppliers
1
The use of 4 or more suppliers was removed from the list table.
Objectives of One method of supplier development that has grown in importance is supplier
Supplier certification. The Park (1996) article describes the results of a study on the objectives
Certification of certification programs. Based on a survey of purchasing professionals, the
programs objectives of certification from most to least important are:
• Quality improvement
• Establish long term partnerships
• Reduce price/cost
• Improve on-time delivery
• Promote co-operation
• Reduce suppliers
• Develop technology/product development
• Other
Differences The authors also considered the differences between organizations that use supplier
between certification and those that do not. Organizations with certification tend to be:
Certifying
Organizations • Larger
and Non • Use international sources compared to local or regional sources
Certifying • Single source more often
Organizations • Have longer term contracts with suppliers
• Involve suppliers earlier in product development
• Share technology more broadly
Benefits of The following table shows the effects of supplier certification based on the Park
Supplier (1996) study.
Certification
Objective Benefit
Improve Quality Lower rejection rates and reduced inspection costs.
Establish long term relationships Contracts length increased, supplier change frequency
decreased.
Reduce price/cost The most prevalent result is no change in price. Where
prices change, more often there is a decrease not an
increase.
Improve on-time delivery The most common effect was improved on-time
delivery, followed by no change in on-time delivery.
Promote co-operation Co-operation improved significantly.
Reduce Suppliers Significant reduction in the number of suppliers.
Develop Technology/Product In terms of technology sharing there was little
Development difference when it came to sharing technology with all
firms. With closely-linked firms there was greater
sharing of technology with certified firms. In terms of
product development, certifying firms were more likely
to involve suppliers in product development.
Supplier Lockhart and Ettkin (1993) provide a model for supplier certification with respect to
Certification: quality. The model is applicable for any other criteria the buying organization wishes
Steps to consider. Certification is a process of examining a supplier to ensure that its goods
and services will consistently meet the needs of the buyer. Certification means a
tighter and longer-term relationship between supplier and buyer.
Setting Goals and Objectives - In this step, the goals and objectives for the
certification program are established. Typically, goals include better quality with the
end result being higher customer satisfaction, speedier product development,
improved quality, cost reductions and risk mitigation.
Agreement - At this stage an agreement is reached between the buyer and supplier
concerning the responsibilities of each party with respect to the goals and objectives
of the certification.
Cycle Times and Cycle time is the time from initial concept of the design for a product until the product
Supplier enters the defined market. Cycle times have become increasingly important in order to
Performance meet rapidly changing customer expectations, and to stay competitive. Consequently,
Measurement cycle times are becoming an increasingly important component of supplier
performance management.
Sharland, Eltantawy and Giunipiero (2003) provide insight into the importance of
cycle times with respect to supply. Product development cycle time is of above-
average importance in terms of supplier selection, it is also of above-average
importance in terms of supplier performance.
Review Now that you have examined supplier development and certification, and have
Objectives for performed an exercise on supplier certification, you should review the session’s
this Session objectives as restated here:
Preview Next In session 9 we examined how to develop and certify chosen suppliers. In session 10,
Session candidates will explore the issues behind procuring services, and perform exercises on
spend analysis and statement of work.
Services Procurement
Activity Directions
Session Overview and Read What You Already Know, the Session Overview and the Objectives
Objectives found in this session.
Objectives and a brief Review the PowerPoint slides for this session (see the Appendix of this
overview of the session. manual. These slides are from the instructor-led version of this module.)
Session Notes: Services Are Read the resources for this section.
Different
Here is the key teaching point:
Resources: • Understand the differences between services and goods procurement
- Ellram: Understanding and and contracts.
Managing the Services
Supply Chain
- Smeltzer: Purchasing
Professionals Perceived
Differences Between
Purchasing Materials and
Purchasing Services
- Session notes
Activity Directions
Session Notes: Spend Read the resources for this section. And, review spend analysis from
Analysis session 1.
Individual Exercise: Spend Read the requirements and complete the exercise in this session.
Analysis (marked – 5%)
Submit the exercise for evaluation. Refer to the Session Schedule
provided for submission instructions.
Individual Exercise: Read the requirements and complete the exercise in this session.
Statement of Work
(marked – 5%) Submit the exercise for evaluation. Refer to the Session Schedule
provided for submission instructions.
Activity Directions
Individual Reflection: Prepare your own approach to a service level agreement for the service
Service Level Agreements you prepared a statement of work for.
Services Procurement
What You Strategic and tactical issues in procurement have been examined throughout this
Already Know module. In this session, we will examine strategic and tactical issues that are unique to
services procurement. While services procurement differs from goods procurement in
some ways, services procurement involves many of the same issues.
Some of the tactical and strategic issues in services procurement are: bidding and
negotiation, organizational issues, make or buy issues, price, cost and quality issues,
supplier selection, and supplier development and certification issues.
Overview The session begins with a description of the characteristics of services that are unique.
This uniqueness however does not mean that services are excluded from normal
procurement protocols. Services fit well within the normal procurement protocol.
Services spend analysis follows the same process as goods spend analysis. Using the
spend analysis concepts and tools presented in session 1, candidates will prepare a
service spend analysis in this session. In addition, we will examine statements of work
and service level agreements, as they are crucial in services procurement.
Service Level Agreements: Guidelines for Public Sector Organizations. New South
Wales Premier’s Department, 1999
Framework Framework questions help you focus on the issues presented in the session. Answer
Questions the following questions as you complete the readings and activities in this session.
Refer to your Session Schedule for instructions on submitting this assignment for
marking.
2. Show the steps you would use to conduct a services spend analysis for your
organization on the chosen service. Describe specific key triggers for the services
spend analysis, and why you chose these triggers.
3. Describe how services spend analysis would fit within your current procurement
strategy. Describe the benefits and constraints (i.e. pros and cons) of services spend
analysis as it relates to your organization.
For more details on the characteristics and purposes of a services spend analysis, refer
to the session notes and readings for this session, and for session 1.
Refer to your Session Schedule for instructions on submitting this assignment for
marking.
1. For the service you analyzed in the services spend analysis exercise, outline the
steps you would take to specify a statement of work for this service.
2. Provide a rationale for each step as it relates to the service being procured and
implementation issues that may arise.
3. Prepare the statement of work so that it can be used as a basis for preparing a
service level agreement in the future.
• Did you provide all the necessary steps for a complete statement of work?
• Did you provide the rationale for each step? Including, did you anticipate
important implementation issues?
• Was your analysis relevant, realistic, and achievable?
For more details on statements of work and service level agreements, refer to the
session notes and readings for this session. General evaluation information for all
exercises is available in Introduction and Overview: Candidate Evaluation.
Services are Services have characteristics that make them different from goods. Services are less
Different tangible than typical goods. For example, audit services are far less tangible than an
engine assembly for a bus. Services cannot be inventoried, while many goods can be
inventoried. In most cases, you cannot store a service for later application or
production.
Smeltzer and Ogden (2002) point out that quality measurement has different
dimensions for services as compared to goods. For services, quality measurement is
often subjective (or qualitative). Using our audit example, measures such as
“thoroughness” and “support of conclusions” are quality dimensions, whereas an
engine assembly can be inspected quantitatively for performance attributes.
Services are often indirectly linked to products. Goods are often directly linked to
products. For example, an audit service may be indirectly involved in creating a bus.
An engine assembly is obviously part of the finished bus.
There may be a range in the complexity of services purchased (lawn cutting is a lot
less complex than legal advice); however, service purchases are usually more complex
than goods purchases. This is a result of the characteristics of services.
Customer support services. These are services directly related to customer support.
Examples include help desks, reverse logistics providers, etc.
Tactical and Smeltzer and Ogden (2002) uncovered several important differences between goods
Strategic purchases and services purchases. For goods purchases, some important and unique
Considerations: considerations are:
Goods
• Factors that relate to the tangible nature of goods (storage, handling, etc.)
• Transportation
• Trust in continuous performance reliability
• Delivery schedule flexibility
Tactical and For services, some important and unique considerations are:
Strategic
Considerations: • Determining target and total costs is more difficult for services
Services • Specification statements (statements of work and service level agreements)
are less robust for services, and usually more complex to prepare
• It is difficult to make quantity purchases with services
• Price negotiation is more complex for services
• Evaluating performance is more complex for services
Using a supply chain analysis approach, the Ellram (2004) article suggests that:
• Poor specifications cause poor control from a service delivery perspective and
a financial perspective.
• Service specifications are often poorly developed, since organizations have an
inability to develop appropriate internal measures of performance for the
same activities. By outsourcing them the same problem occurs.
• Moral hazard problems: a service supplier has incentive to increase the scope
of work (scope creep).
• Lack of professional management.
Additional Costs There are added costs in the services supply chain such as:
for Services
• Service suppliers use their customer’s leverage to extract lower prices from their
suppliers. These savings are not necessarily passed on to the buyer.
• Potential Additional charges for work outside the agreement.
• Suppliers withholding payments to sub-suppliers for long time periods. Sub-
suppliers build this cost into their costs, and this is passed on to the buyer.
• Billing errors may be frequent.
• Providing summary rather than detailed invoicing.
• Use of lower-skilled labour than specified in the agreement.
• Providing service below what was agreed to.
• Providing package deals so suppliers can not be easily compared.
Services are the Similar to the procurement of goods, procurement for services should follow a
Same: standard set of steps. The steps are:
Procurement
Involvement • Need recognition
• Need description
• Sourcing
• Supplier selection
• Ordering
• Monitoring
• Receipt and inspection
• Payment
• Documentation & Relationship management
Similar to procurement for goods, procurement should be the lead resource for service
purchases.
Services Spend Service often are indirect spend; however, where the organization making the
Analysis purchase is a customer service oriented organization, it may be direct spend. Consider
a computer manufacturer that offers phone support for the computer hardware and
software it produces. Suppose the phone support is provided by a third party call
centre. In this case, the third party provider costs are direct spend. Suppose the
manufacturer also contracted for lawn maintenance service at its headquarters. This
would be an indirect spend.
Many organizations allow services spend to occur throughout the organization with
little management from procurement. This compounds the difficulty in acquiring
spend analysis information.
Spend analysis for services should follow the approach outlined in session 1.
The complexity of a statement of work will depend on the complexity of the service
being acquired. Typical Content for development of the statement of work are as
follows:
• Communicate on a regular basis with the supplier. Use the team that
developed the statement of work to engage with the supplier if appropriate.
• Monitor the plan.
• Review and approve or disapprove deliverables as required.
• Limit scope creep and change orders as required.
Specification: Service level agreements arose from the outsourcing of information technology.
Service Level Service level agreements are a subcomponent of all outsourcing agreements, and can
Agreements arise from a statement of work. Service level agreements set the expected standard
for service quality.
The New South Wales methodology (1999) for developing service level agreements
can be applied equally in private and public sector organizations. The steps in the
process are as follow:
1. Start up: form a team of members from the service supplier and service user.
Determine the goals for the agreement. Set general parameters related to the
timeframe for the agreement.
2. Involve key players. Who will be affected by the agreement? Who has a
vested interest?
3. Identify needs and expectations.
4. Define service levels. Typically these are defined in terms of quantity, quality,
timeliness and cost.
5. Establish performance indicators. The indictors are developed from the
service level specifications.
6. Confirm mutual issues. The agreement should recognize the two-way nature
of the agreement. It should include the method of dispute resolution and the
method to refresh the agreement as time passes.
7. Determine the costs and terms of payment.
8. Agree on the framework, content and style of the SLA.
9. Establish a review framework.
10. Create and sign the agreement.
Review Now that you have examined supplier development and certification, and have
Objectives for performed an exercise on supplier certification, you should review the session’s
this Session objectives as restated here:
Preview Next In session 10 we examined how to procure services from suppliers. In session 11,
Session candidates will explore the issues behind e-procurement, and submit a written case
report.
e-Procurement
Z Forms of e-procurement
Z Pros and cons of e-procurement
Z e-Procurement knowledge areas
Z Implementing e-procurement
Z Reverse auctions
Activity Directions
Session Overview and Read What You Already Know, the Session Overview and the
Objectives Objectives found in this session.
Objectives and a brief overview Review the PowerPoint slides for this session (see the Appendix of
of the session. this manual. These slides are from the instructor-led version of this
module.)
Individual Reflection: E- Reflect on the following:
procurement Used • What forms of e-procurement do you use in your organization?
• What are the advantages and disadvantages of your e-procurement
strategy?
Resources:
- Session notes
Session Notes: Advantages Read the resources for this section.
and Disadvantages of
E-procurement Here is the key teaching point:
• Expand on the list of advantages and disadvantages of e-
Resources: procurement methods as outlined in the session notes.
- Session notes
Session Notes: Read the resources for this section.
E-procurement Knowledge
Areas Here is the key teaching point:
• It is important to gain an understanding of each of the key
Resources: knowledge areas.
- Porter: A purchasing
manager’s guide
- Session notes
Activity Directions
Individual Reflection: Reflect on the following:
Knowledge Level and E- • What is the knowledge level in your organization related to e-
procurement procurement?
• In which knowledge area(s) is your organization the weakest? Where
is it strong?
Activity Directions
Individual Case Report: Analyze the case using the Case Preparation method described in the
Boeing Australia Limited Introduction and Overview.
(marked – 10%)
Prepare the case report according to the instructions in this session. Also,
Resources: use the guidelines in the Written Case Reports section of the
− Boeing case Introduction and Overview.
− Introduction and
Overview: Written Submit the case report for evaluation. Refer to the Session Schedule for
Case Reports (report submission instructions.
guidelines)
− Session notes in this Here are the key teaching points:
session • Are there limitations to BAL current practices? What are they?
− PowerPoint slides for • What issues need to be considered in upgrading BAL’s procurement
this session platform?
− Framework questions in • Is the company’s size important?
this session • What are the potential costs and benefits?
− Required readings for
this session
− Fabritek, 1992 Sample
Case and Report
(Appendix)
Session Wrap Up Review this session’s objectives. View the topics and activities for the
next session.
e-Procurement
What You E-procurement links concepts from many of the previous sessions. E-procurement, i.e.
Already Know the procurement of goods or services electronically, and specifically over the Internet,
must be based on sound strategy. The procurement relationship issues we have studied
may be favorably or adversely affected by the implementation of e-procurement. In
some cases the supply partnership is strengthened by e-procurement (e.g. by EDI, or
electronic data interchange), while in other cases the relationship may be weakened
(e.g. by reverse auctions). For e-procurement to work an organization needs to be clear
on what is being procured, therefore, needs definition and specification is crucial.
Supplier evaluation is also an important issue, and so is the use of cross-functional
teams to implement e-procurement.
Overview This session covers the range of e-procurement activities, ranging from simple
electronic data interchange to reverse auctions. The advantages and disadvantages of e-
procurement are considered as are the knowledge areas needed to use e-procurement in
a strategic and tactical manner. Factors to be considered in implementing e-
procurement are provided. Reverse auctions, an emerging trend in e-procurement are
considered in depth. These form the basis of any e-procurement approach.
e-Procurement, continued
Clark, Chris. Five Auction Steps. Purchasing. June 21, 2001. Pages 24 to 26.
Manciagli, Dana. A Supplier’s View. Purchasing. June 21, 2001 Page 26.
Atkinson, William. IT Firm uses reverse auction for big contract labour buy.
Purchasing. December 22, 2000. Pages 97 to 99.
Framework Framework questions help you focus on the issues presented in the session. Answer
Questions the following questions as you complete the readings and activities in this session.
e-Procurement, continued
This case report is worth 10% of your overall mark for this module.
Refer to your Session Schedule for instructions on submitting this assignment for
marking.
The requirement for the written case report is: considering the following questions,
write a report stating the issues, criteria, analysis and plan of action (i.e.
recommendations) for Boeing Australia:
To help you prepare for the report, see the session notes in this session. For further
reference, please see the sample case, Fabritek, 1992, and the sample case report in the
Appendix.
Forms of E-procurement is a form of e-commerce (electronic commerce and commerce over the
E-procurement Internet). E-procurement relates specifically to b2b (business to business)
relationships in the sale (from the supply side) and acquisition (from the buyer side) of
goods and services. E-procurement can take a variety of forms. These include:
• Electronic data interchange (EDI). EDI ranges from file exchange for orders
to email for routine purchases.
• EFT or electronic funds transfer is used for payments.
• E-catalogs are catalogs available electronically. They range from simple
versions of a suppliers catalogue on CD to customized catalogs for specific
types of buyers available on the Internet or an Intranet.
• E-marketplaces (also called net markets or hubs) are traditional markets
available in electronic form, i.e. on the Internet or an Intranet.
• E-auctions are auctions that take place on the Internet. E-auctions can be
forward auctions or reverse auctions.
EDI is the process of exchange information and documents over computer networks.
The most wide-spread use of EDI is through e-mail. Electronic data interchange may
involve more sophisticated approaches with specific software applications. An
example is the use of a wide area network (WAN) by an automobile insurance
company to issue purchase orders for vehicle repairs to body shops. In this case, the
WAN provides a higher level of security than the Internet. Similarly the exchange of
funds between two organizations can be accomplished through electronic funds
transfer.
E-catalogs
E-Auctions
E-auctions are a subtype within e-marketplaces. Forward auctions are auctions where
buyers enter the market to buy a good or service. Once a base price is established, the
price is driven up through buyers auctioning for the good or service.
Reverse auctions are auctions where the buyer places their requirements in the
marketplace, and suppliers bid to provide the good or service. Once the base price is
established, the price is driven down through sellers auctioning to provide the good or
service (at lower and lower prices).
E-procurement Millen Porter (2000) outlines the seven key knowledge areas that procurement
Knowledge Areas professionals need be familiar with in terms of e-procurement. These are:
• Software
• Net markets (hubs)
• Market making technologies
• Content creation, management and aggregation
• Integration with back end systems
• Service to net markets
• Intelligent agents
Net markets: certain websites are designated as sources for procurement. A search of
the site with a web browser is used to procure the goods or services. This approach
offers the least amount of customization, but is typically the lowest cost method.
Net Markets Even if an organization has installed software, it may wish to participate in net
markets. Net markets operate in a hub fashion, allowing multiple information flows
simultaneously. For a procurement professional, an important consideration in net
markets is deciding the type of market that the organization wants to participate in.
Net markets can be classified in terms of two criteria: openness and focus. Openness
refers to whether the market is a public marketplace (meaning it is open to all sellers
and buyers) or a closed private marketplace. Focus refers to who leads the net market.
The market can be led from the buy side, resulting in a focus on supplier competition.
Or, the supply side can lead, resulting in competition amongst buyers.
Market Making Market making technologies are tools to establish pricing (formerly called pricing
Technologies discovery) that result in an exchange occurring between the buyer and seller. Some
examples of market making and enabling technologies are: tools that allow for better
specifications, tools that aid in RFP and RFQ writing, decision support technology,
multi-organization collaboration technology, and auction technology.
Content Content aggregation is the process of collecting catalogs of information and compiling
Aggregation the information at one site. Content aggregators can create additional content by
providing customized views of catalogs or product categories. There are several
important considerations with content aggregation:
Integration with Systems designed to work in the e-marketplace typically do not provide data to
Back End back end systems (e.g. an organization’s financial and manufacturing systems). One
Systems approach is to revise system infrastructure to allow for integration. A second approach
is to manually populate data in the back end system (e.g. enter the transactions
generated by the e-procurement system manually into the accounting system). A third
option is a middleware solution. Middleware is software between the front end
procurement system and the back end systems that automatically converts e-
procurement transactions into a format that can be used in the back end systems.
Services to Net Millen Porter (2000) indicates that as net markets become more competitive and
Markets efficient, transaction costs will decrease to the point that market hosts will not earn
sufficient revenue from hosting. To survive, hosts will need to provide additional
value added services. Some of the services that might be offered are sourcing
research, supplier evaluation, and logistics services.
Intelligent Agents The intelligent agent refers to tools that can search many e-marketplaces. The
intelligent agent tools use a set of specifications and preliminary decision criteria to
arrive at a set of potential choices for the purchase of goods and services.
Implementing The article entitled "Consultants’ Top 12 e-procurement tips" (2000) discusses the
E-Procurement considerations in implementing e-procurement in an organization. The twelve tips are:
Tips
1. Do something, do it soon.
2. Start with strategic sourcing. Then apply e-procurement.
3. Respect your legacy.
4. Segment the supply base and apply e-sourcing tools appropriately.
5. Start with the easy, but don’t neglect the hard.
6. Don’t underestimate the sweeping internal changes e-procurement demands.
7. Focus on delivering sustainable benefits.
8. Understand your power as a market maker.
9. Treat critical suppliers with kid gloves.
10. Benchmark the competition.
11. Remember there are no best practices established in e-procurement.
12. Bear in mind that “you ain’t seen nothing yet.”
1. Do something, do it soon.
Rather than being mired in never ending analysis on this decision, the article suggests
that organizations should move forward on e-procurement. Risk can be mitigated
through the use of ASP’s. Risk is also reduced since data format standards are
becoming more common.
Two questions related to back end or legacy systems need to be considered when
moving to e-procurement:
• How will the e-procurement system relate to the back end system?
• Should the legacy purchasing system be cleansed and mined prior to the new
system being implemented?
Implementing 4. Segment the supply base and apply e-sourcing tools appropriately
E-Procurement
Tips, continued Apply the appropriate e-procurement tool to the type of supply. Different approaches
and degrees of effort apply depending on the good or service (e.g. office supplies vs. a
new piece of capital equipment).
In many cases e-procurement tools are applied only to simple goods and services. This
is a good starting point for e-procurement. E-procurement should move to more
sophisticated supplies.
Instead of focusing on short term benefits from lower prices due to enhanced sourcing
options, the real focus of e-procurement should be improving the efficiency of the
markets and supply chains in which the organization operates. This will provide the
most significant long-term benefits.
At the time of the article (2000) there was no best approach to e-procurement. Since
that time e-procurement has continued to expand. Keep apprised of developments in
e-procurement as you implement.
Reverse A reverse auction is an electronic auction where buyers enter requirements, and
Auctions: suppliers bid to provide the required goods and services It is conducted in real-time,
Steps and bidders see the offers of competitive bidders but no the names of the other
bidders. The bidding prices move downwards as the auction progresses.
Define the good or service that is the subject of the auction, and provide a timeline for
auction-related activities.
Develop a list of qualified suppliers, and attempt to obtain their buy in for the auction
process. Train the suppliers to use the tools required for the auction.
Allow sufficient time for bidders to review and analyze the specifications. Answer
questions in a timely manner during this phase.
Run the auction, and provide prompt feedback to successful and unsuccessful bidders.
Reverse Reverse auctions while providing a method to elicit favourable pricing, have a number
Auctions: Issues of issues:
• Suppliers may view the auction as focusing on price and not value or quality.
They may bid using the lowest possible quality that meets the specification.
• There is opportunity for unethical behavior on the part of buyer and suppliers.
Buyers could submit phantom “low ball” bids, or include an unqualified
bidder in the auction to increase competition even though they don’t intend to
use the supplier. Suppliers could collude, and similar bids to trigger
renegotiation. Or, suppliers could participate in the event in order to gain
knowledge about their competitors.
• The auction may drive certain buyers out of the supply chain, even though
they have ongoing relationships with the buyer.
• Reverse auctions may undermine supply relationships. Existing suppliers
may be threatened by the approach. Low bidders at one reverse auction may
be different than those at another auction for the same good or service.
Review Now that you have examined the issues involved in e-procurement, and have
Objectives for recommended a course of action for Boeing Australia, you should review the session’s
this Session objectives as restated here:
Preview Next In session 11 we analyzed the issues and decisions behind an e-procurement strategy.
Session In session 12, candidates will explore issues involving users and suppliers, such as p-
cards, vendor managed inventory, and just in time inventory.
Z P-Cards: Benefits
Z P- Cards: Considerations in Implementation
Z Vendor ( Supplier) Managed Inventory
Z Just in Time II
Z Wrap up
Activity Directions
Session Overview and Objectives Read What You Already Know, the Session Overview and
the Objectives found in this session.
Objectives and a brief overview of the
session. Review the PowerPoint slides for this session (see the
Appendix of this manual. These slides are from the
instructor-led version of this module.)
Session Notes: Read the resources for this section.
P-Cards
Here are the key teaching points:
Resources: • Understand the benefits of p-card use.
- Palmer: Are Corporate Procurement • Understand the considerations related to p-card use.
Cards for You? • And, understand the implementation issues.
- Carbone: To save more distribute more
cards study says.
- Gibley: A guide to purchasing card
success: overcoming 8 key hurdles.
- Session notes
Activity Directions
Individual Reflection: VMI Reflect on the following:
• Does your organization use vendor managed inventory? Why? Why
not?
• Should your organization be using vendor managed inventory?
• What would be the benefits of vendor managed inventory for your
organization
• How would you implement VMI?
Arrange the details for the invigilation and writing of your exam with
your provincial or territorial Institute.
The exam will be the same format as the written case report assignments.
The format is explained in the Written Case Reports section of the
Introduction and Overview.
What You As shown in session 11, e-procurement processes may lead to closer supplier/buyer
Already Know relationships as well as increase efficiency of the procurement process. E-procurement
enables additional opportunities such as: purchasing card (p-cards), vendor managed
inventory and Just in Time II inventory systems. Enabling these technologies often
results in closer relationships with suppliers.
Overview In this session we explore the use of purchasing cards as a tactical method to reduce
procurement costs, as well as to provide additional benefits. Issues and approaches to
p-card implementation are discussed.
Two key approaches that affect buyer-supplier relationships are explored: vendor
managed inventory and Just in Time II (JIT II). The joint gains of vendor managed
inventory are considered, as well as steps in the implementation of vendor managed
inventory. Just in time inventory and JIT II are discussed. JIT II is one of the closest
supply partnerships, with the supplier’s staff working at the buying company. The
supplier’s staff has authority to transact in much the same way as the staff of the
buying company.
Dixon, Lance. JIT II: A New Approach to Supply Management. Center for Quality
Management Journal. August 1992. Pages 15-19.
Pragman, Claudia, H. JIT II: A Purchasing Concept For Reducing Lead Times in
Time-Based Competition. Business Horizons. July-August 1996. Pages 54-58.
Framework Framework questions help you focus on the issues presented in the session. Answer
Questions the following questions as you complete the readings and activities in this session.
P- Cards: In spite of these benefits there are often concerns over the use of p-cards. The most
Considerations in prevalent of these is the control issue. There is a perceived risk that employees may
Implementation use the card for inappropriate purchases.
The Palmer (1996) article suggests there are 3 considerations in implementing p-card
programs. These are:
1. Controlling p-card behavior (the risk of abuse)
2. Organizational issues
3. Integration issues
4. Implementation issues
The control issue involves: who receives p-cards, what are the dollar limits and item
types allowed, and what is the documentation and approval process.
There are a variety of options: provide them to all employees, provide them only
senior staff, provide them only to procurement employees, provide them to volume
purchasing employees, provide them only to employees who travel, and etc. The
decision on who to provide p-cards to will depend on the risk tolerance of the
organization as well as the degree of control exercised over the cards.
Dollar limits
Dollar limits may be set in a variety of ways such as: limits on spend on a particular
type of supply (or supplier), number of uses, and etc. To derive the right dollar
amount level, assess p-card spending relative to the spend under current purchasing
processes. Also, determine the level of risk the organization can tolerate.
Documentation may range from attaching receipts to the monthly statements, to more
formal purchase logging systems with sign off by superiors. The system of
documentation will depend on the risk tolerance of the organization.
Other measures
These could include having staff sign an internal agreement on the use of p-cards.
Organizational considerations
Another organizational issue is encouraging p-card use. If p-cards are not used, the
benefits are not realized. The article suggests higher charge-backs to areas that are
authorized and do not use p-cards. Another suggestion is to award bonuses based on
the number of transaction shifted to p-cards (this could have unintended consequences
if not managed carefully).
Gibley (1999) extends the discussion with an analysis of issues that need to be
addressed during P-card implementation:
Implementation Issues
• Challenge #1: Build support across the organization: the crucial parts of the
organization should be aware, or be part of the implementation effort.
• Challenge #2: Obtain senior management support: focus on profits.
• Challenge #3: Avoid excessive controls otherwise benefits may be limited.
• Challenge #4: Allocate sufficient resources.
• Challenge #5: Hire the right administrator – a financial-oriented person with
liaison skills (internal and external to the organization).
• Challenge #6: Clearly define the goals and measures for success.
• Challenge #7: Expand the program. Roll out a pilot program and, if successful,
take the next steps.
• Challenge #8: Report successes.
Vendor Vendor or supplier managed inventory is where the vendor controls the amount of
Managed inventory at a particular site or sites. Vendor managed inventory is a component of a
Inventory: just in time approach to inventory.
Benefits
In vendor managed inventory, the goals are to reduce costs across the chain and to
improve response time. The vendor decides when to order and how much inventory to
order. The vendor is often the owner of the inventory.
For both suppliers and buyers, vendor managed inventory can reduce transportation
costs as the frequency of small shipments is reduced.
Vendor managed inventory also has costs and disadvantages. Suppliers can
experience increased inventory holding costs. The buying organization has a greater
risk of supplier failure, and potentially less leverage over the supplier in future
negotiations.
Implementing The implementation of vendor managed inventory should follow a set of steps:
Vendor Managed
Inventory Gaining Support – Gaining support of senior management is critical. Only after this
step can you engage the support of the supplier or potential suppliers.
Analysis - Procurement outlines the qualitative and quantitative benefits, and costs
and risks of vendor managed inventory related to a particular supply or supplier
Negotiation - During this phase negotiation occurs with the chosen supplier(s). The
goals of the negotiation are related to the following factors: staffing for the project,
technology, and sharing of financial gains.
Just In Time Just in Time, or JIT is an approach to inventory management where supplies arrive at
the desired location when they are needed. Just in time systems minimize stationary
inventory and inventory holding costs. Often, suppliers are located near the
organization. Since failure of just in time supplies can adversely affect production,
just in time systems focus on low defect (zero) in terms of the supply and delivery of
the supply.
JIT has several implications for procurement. Relationships with suppliers become
increasingly important. This results in additional emphasis on sourcing, selection,
monitoring, certification and development. Specifications must be precise with respect
to quality, quantity and timing. Procurement must also have a strong relationship with
the users of the goods.
Due to the risk of potential failures, organizations have adopted ‘just in case’
inventory. In this approach a certain amount of inventory is held either on or off site
as a buffer to JIT system failures.
Just in Time II The strongest supplier relationships occur when an organization uses a JIT II
approach. JIT II was pioneered by the Bose Corporation and is a registered trademark.
The Dixon article (1992) outlines JIT II at Bose. In JIT II, supplier employees work
within the buying host organization. They are usually empowered to undertake
activities such as ordering goods and services, and meeting with product engineers,
design teams, and marketing staff. They have the same authority as an employee of
the host.
JIT II provides a variety of benefits to the buying organization. Some of these are:
• The relationship will likely be long term, assuring a market for their goods.
• Improved communication (and lower error rates due to miscommunication)
with key buyers.
• Reduced transportation costs.
Review Now that you have examined ways to involve other users and suppliers, you should
Objectives for review the session’s objectives as restated here:
this Session
Upon completion of this session candidates should be able to:
Preview Next In session 12 we explored involving users and suppliers in the management of the
Session supply chain. This is the last session before the exam.
In the exam, you will be required to analyze a case, and prepare a written case report.
The exam case and instructions will be sent to you prior to the exam. If you have not
received this information, or arranged for exam writing, contact your provincial or
territorial Institute.
Module Examination
Z Examination Format
Z What to Bring to the Examination
Z Final Marks
Module Examination
Overview The final examination is the final step in successfully completing this module. This
section will provide you with information on the process involved in writing the final
examination.
Examination The final exam is four hours long, and consists of a case analysis and written case
Format report. The exam is worth 25% of your total mark for the module.
You must confirm the exact date, time, and location of the final exam with your
provincial or territorial Institute.
The exam case study and exam instructions will be available prior to the exam. If
you have not received this information, contact your Marker or your provincial or
territorial Institute.
Candidates will be expected to prepare the case study prior to the exam. Then,
candidates will write a written case report on this case during the exam.
For guidelines on preparing and writing cases, please refer to Case Preparation and
Written Case Reports in the Introduction and Overview.
What to Bring to The following items can be taken into the examination room.
the Examination
The textbook and any course materials needed for reference. Although the
examination is "open book", you should know where to look in the materials for
information. Prepare in advance by using "post-it" tabs to mark important topics
and label them.
A (quiet) calculator
Do not bring any other pre-written materials for submission. All writing for the
case report must be done during the four hours of the exam.
Candidates who achieve a mark of less than 60%, but more than 50% will receive a
letter of caution.
Candidates who achieve a mark of less than 50% will be required to complete an
additional assignment. Please contact your provincial or territorial Institute to discuss.
Final marks are mailed to candidates approximately four (4) weeks after the final
examination is written. To ensure confidentiality, marks are not given over the
telephone. Also, marks are mailed only to the candidates.
Module Evaluation
Module Candidates are required to submit an evaluation form for this module, rating the module
Evaluation content and format.
Form
To obtain the evaluation form, please access the PMAC site at http://www.pmac.ca.
Then, click on the Education tab.
Then, on the right-hand menu, click on New Accreditation Program
The evaluation form will be in this menu.
Session 1
Tactical versus Strategic
Procurement
Session Agenda
1
Session Objectives
Session Objectives
2
Discussion Questions
Be prepared to discuss the following questions:
Where is your organization with respect to strategic purchasing? Is it
tactical or strategic? Is it both?
Is your organization acquiring greater strategic skills in its purchasing?
How will your organization move to become more strategic?
Does your organization use spend analysis?
What are the benefits and constraints to performing a spend analysis
in your organization?
What is an example in your organization of direct spend? Indirect
spend?
Why is spend analysis important in your organization?
What are the supply risks in your organization?
How might you manage supply risks in your organization?
• Modern view:
¾ Procurement is involved with all supplies
¾ Procurement is the key to supply chain
management
¾ Procurement is proactive
¾ Procurement is customer value focused
3
Procurement and Strategy
• Procurement is strategic.
4
Procurement and Strategy
• Cavinato’s staging:
10
5
Procurement and Strategy
11
12
6
Procurement and Strategy
• Spend Analysis
¾ Definition:
13
• Spend Analysis:
¾Heath suggests:
14
7
Procurement and Strategy
• Spend Analysis
¾ Heath’s Triggers for action:
15
• Spend Analysis
16
8
Procurement and Strategy
• Spend Analysis
17
18
9
Procurement and Strategy
• Supply Risk
¾ Definition (Zsidisin):
o“the probability of an incident associated with inbound
supply from individual supplier failures or the supplier
market occurring, in which its outcome results in the
inability of the purchasing firm to meet customer
demand or causes threats to customer life and security”
19
Supply risk
¾ Market characteristics
20
10
Procurement and Strategy
21
22
11
Procurement and Strategy
23
• Executive Summary
• Process Elements
• List of issues with impact analysis
• Environmental and Root Cause Analysis
• Alternatives or Options
• Recommendation(s) and Implementation
• Monitor and Control
• Judgment and Integration
• Written Communication: Format, Language
and Style
• Exhibits and/or Appendixes (if applicable)
12
Case Report: Marking
CASE ANALYSIS MARKS MARK
AVAILBLE
I. PROCESS ELEMENTS 10
V. RECOMMENDATIONS 5
VI. IMPLEMENTATION 10
OVERALL
JUDGEMENT AND INTERGRATION 10
25
Session Objectives
26
13
Session Objectives
27
14
Session 2
Procurement Processes
Session Agenda
1
Session Objectives
Session Objectives
6. Apply principles.
2
Discussion Questions
Be prepared to discuss the following questions:
How are needs recognized in your organization?
Why is getting the specification correct the most important part of a
purchasing requirement?
In your organization, do you collaborate on specifications? Why? Why
not? Should you?
Provide an example of follow-up and expediting from your experience.
Describe a situation where you wished you had good documentation
and it was missing?
Can your organization use standard products more often?
What would the benefits be to your organization if you used standard
products more often?
Have you developed specifications with some of the common problems?
or tactical in nature?
How would you revise purchasing procedures at Blozis
3
Procurement Processes
• 10 steps:
¾ Need recognition
¾ Need description (Specification)
¾ Sourcing
¾ Supplier selection
¾ Ordering
¾ Monitoring
¾ Receipt and Inspection
¾ Payment
¾ Documentation
¾ Relationship management
Procurement Processes
4
Procurement Processes
Procurement Processes
10
5
Procurement Processes
11
Procurement Processes
12
6
Procurement Processes
•Documentation
13
Procurement Processes
14
7
Procurement Processes
¾ Simple Specifications:
o Performance
o Fit and function
o Brand or equal
o Samples
o Grades (commodities)
15
Procurement Processes
¾ Complex Specifications:
o Commercial
o Design
o Engineering Drawings
o Material and Method
16
8
Procurement Processes
¾ Standardization:
17
Procurement Processes
High
Complexity
and
Departmental Importance of
Involvement the supply
Low
Low High
Procurement
Involvement
18
9
Procurement Processes
High
Complexity
and
Supplying firm Importance of
Involvement the supply
Low
Low High
Supplying firm
involvement
19
Procurement Processes
¾ Problem Areas
o Lack of Clarity
o Limiting Competition
o Overly Restrictive
20
10
Procurement Processes
21
Procurement Processes
22
11
Session Objectives
23
Session Objectives
24
12
Individual Written Case Report
25
26
13
Session 3
Competitive Bidding and
Negotiation
Session Agenda
1
Session Objectives
Discussion Questions
Be prepared to discuss the following questions:
What are some of the methods of competitive bidding
2
Discussion Questions, continued
DeHavilland Inc:
What are some possible BATNAs for DeHavilland? For
Marton?
Who are the parties and what were their
interests/objectives?
What is the potential value to be created?
and Marton?
What are some possible ethical considerations?
3
Evaluating Case Discussions
• Competitive bidding
4
Competitive Bidding and Negotiation
• Competitive bidding
• Negotiation
10
5
Competitive Bidding and Negotiation
• Negotiation
¾ Objectives:
o To obtain a fair and reasonable price
o To obtain the desired quality
o To obtain the desired performance
o To persuade the supplier to provide a high level of co-
operation
o To have more control
o To build a sound long term relationship with the
supplier
11
• Negotiation
12
6
Competitive Bidding and Negotiation
13
14
7
Competitive Bidding and Negotiation
¾ BATNAS
¾ Parties
¾ Interests
¾ Values
¾ Barriers
¾ Power
¾ Ethics
15
¾ BATNA:
16
8
Competitive Bidding and Negotiation
¾ PARTIES:
17
¾ INTERESTS:
¾ VALUE:
18
9
Competitive Bidding and Negotiation
¾ BARRIERS:
19
¾ POWER:
20
10
Competitive Bidding and Negotiation
¾ ETHICS:
o Truth or not
o Fairness
o Economic Pressure
o Effect in bystanders
21
22
11
Competitive Bidding and Negotiation
23
24
12
Competitive Bidding and Negotiation
25
26
13
Competitive Bidding and Negotiation
27
28
14
Session Objectives
29
15
Session 4
Procurement and
Supply Management
Organization
Session Agenda
1
Session Objectives
Session Objectives
2
Discussion Questions
Be prepared to discuss the following questions:
What department in your firm do you have working
relationships with on a day to day basis as it relates to
procurement?
What is the condition of those relationships?
¾ Production
¾ Design
¾ Finance
¾ Marketing
3
Procurement and Supply Management
Organization
• Internal Relationships
¾ Information technology
¾ Legal
4
Procurement and Supply Management
Organization
• Financial Leverage Effect Example
Sales $15,000,000
Total Materials $5,000,000
Total Labour $7,000,000
Overhead $1,500,000
Cost of Goods Sold $13,500,000
Profit $1,500,000
10
5
Procurement and Supply Management
Organization
• Financial Leverage Effect Example
11
Inventory $3,000,000
Other $1,000,000
Total current Assets $4,000,000
Fixed Assets $7,500,000
12
6
Procurement and Supply Management
Organization
• Financial Leverage Effect Example
¾$15,000,000/$11,500,000 = 1.3
13
14
7
Procurement and Supply Management
Organization
• Financial Leverage Effect Example
Partial I n c o m e S t a t e m e n t
B e fo re A fte r
S a le s $ 1 5 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0 $ 1 5 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0
T o ta l M a te r ia ls $ 5 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0 $ 4 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0
T o ta l L a b o u r $ 7 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0 $ 7 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0
O v e rh e a d $ 1 ,5 0 0 ,0 0 0 $ 1 ,5 0 0 ,0 0 0
C o s t o f G o o d s S o ld $ 1 3 ,5 0 0 ,0 0 0 $ 1 2 ,5 0 0 ,0 0 0
Gross P r o f i t $ 1 ,5 0 0 ,0 0 0 $ 2 ,5 0 0 ,0 0 0
P r o fit M a r g in 1 0 .0 % 1 6 .7 %
Partial B a l a n c e S h e e t
In v e n t o r y $ 3 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0 $ 2 ,4 0 0 ,0 0 0
O th e r $ 1 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0 $ 1 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0
T o ta l c u rre n t A s s e ts $ 4 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0 $ 3 ,4 0 0 ,0 0 0
F ix e d A s s e ts $ 7 ,5 0 0 ,0 0 0 $ 7 ,5 0 0 ,0 0 0
T o ta l A s s e ts $ 1 1 ,5 0 0 ,0 0 0 $ 1 0 ,9 0 0 ,0 0 0
A s s e t tu rn o v e r 1 .3 1 .4
R e tu rn o n A s s e ts 1 3 .0 % 2 2 .9 %
15
16
8
Procurement and Supply Management
Organization
• Cross Functional Teams
¾ Benefits/Reasons:
o Procurement is strategic
o Financial improvement
o Better results
o Cuts time
o Better communication
o Better to deal with complex products
o Higher creativity
17
¾ Success factors:
o Executive sponsorship
o Effective leadership
o Right people
o Training
o Resources
18
9
Procurement and Supply Management
Organization
• Do we use cross functional teams in my
organization?
• What worked?
19
¾ Centralized
¾ Decentralized
¾ Hybrid
20
10
Procurement and Supply Management
Organization
• Procurement Organization
¾ Centralized - Advantages
o May reduce costs
o Lower supplier costs
o Specialization
o Better co-ordination and control
o Easier to develop strategic view
21
¾ Centralized - Disadvantages
o Reduces teamwork
o Too much control
o Too specialized
o Isolation from business units
22
11
Procurement and Supply Management
Organization
• Procurement Organization
¾ Decentralized - Advantages
o Faster response to business unit needs
o Support local activities
o Wider authority better morale
23
¾ Decentralized - Disadvantages
o Higher cost lost volume discount opportunities
o Communications
o Difficult to create strategic focus
o Inconsistencies
24
12
Procurement and Supply Management
Organization
• Procurement Organization
25
¾ Effect on Procurement
o CPO’s role
o Stress on staff
o Shared services approach
o Staff competency issue if shift toward centralization
26
13
Procurement and Supply Management
Organization
Group exercise (marked):
Centralization vs. Decentralization
27
Session Objectives
28
14
Session Objectives
29
15
Session 5
Make or Buy
Session Agenda
1
Session Objectives
Session Objectives
2
Discussion Questions
Be prepared to discuss the following questions:
Does your organization deploy make or buy analysis? Why? Why not?
In your organization have you considered the strategic level factors
related to make or buy?
Is your organization organized on a strategic business unit or core
competence basis?
Does your organization have core competencies? What are they?
What are your organization’s core products? Do they flow from the core
competencies?
Do you use total cost of ownership in your organization?
What are the pros and cons of using total cost of ownership in your
organization?
Make or Buy
3
Make or Buy
¾ Core competencies
¾ Supplier dependence
Make or Buy
¾ Production capability
¾Qualitative/intangibles
4
Make or Buy
• Core Competencies
o tend to be hidden
Make or Buy
• Core Competencies
10
5
Make or Buy
• Core Competencies
¾ Core Products
¾ End Products
11
Make or Buy
12
6
Make or Buy
o Pretransaction
o Transaction
o Posttransaction
13
Make or Buy
¾ Pretransaction costs:
o Need recognition
o Need description (specification)
o Sourcing
o Supplier Selection
14
7
Make or Buy
¾ Transaction costs:
o Ordering
o Monitoring
o Receipt and Inspection
o Payment
o Documentation
15
Make or Buy
¾ Benefits:
o Performance measurement
o Decision making
o Communication
o Insight/Understanding
o Supports continuous improvement
o Decommissioning and Disposal
16
8
Make or Buy
¾ Issues in Implementation:
o Refocusing
o Deciding appropriate circumstances
o Data needs
o Pilot testing versus full rollout
17
Make or Buy
18
9
Make or Buy
¾ Discounting:
Year 0 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Cash $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000
Discount Factor 0.930233 0.865333 0.804961 0.748801 0.696559
1/1.0751 1/1.0752 1/1.0753 1/1.0754 1/1.0755
Discounted Value $9,302 $8,653 $8,050 $7,488 $6,966 $40,459
19
Make or Buy
¾ Steps:
20
10
Make or Buy
¾ Example
Time Up to today Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 TOTAL
(or year 0)
Vendor A
Pretransaction $100,000
Transaction $100,000
Posttansaction $40,000 $60,000 $60,000 $60,000 $120,000
Total Cost $200,000 $40,000 $60,000 $60,000 $60,000 $120,000 $540,000
Discount factor 0.9346 0.8734 0.8163 0.7629 0.7130
Total Discounted value $200,000 $37,383 $52,406 $48,978 $45,774 $85,558 $470,099
Vendor B
Pretransaction $100,000
Transaction $250,000
Posttansaction $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $55,000
Total Cost $350,000 $0 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $55,000 $495,000
Discount factor 0.9346 0.8734 0.8163 0.7629 0.7130
Total Discounted value $350,000 $0 $26,203 $24,489 $22,887 $39,214 $462,793
Discount Rate 7%
21
Make or Buy
Pretransaction $100,000
Transaction $100,000
Posttansaction $40,000 $60,000 $60,000 $60,000 $120,000
Total Cost $200,000 $40,000 $60,000 $60,000 $60,000 $120,000 $540,000
Discount factor 0.9208 0.8479 0.7807 0.7189 0.6620
Total Discounted value $200,000 $36,832 $50,873 $46,845 $43,135 $79,439 $457,125
Vendor B
Pretransaction $100,000
Transaction $250,000
Posttansaction $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $55,000
Total Cost $350,000 $0 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $55,000 $495,000
Discount factor 0.9208 0.8479 0.7807 0.7189 0.6620
Total Discounted value $350,000 $0 $25,437 $23,422 $21,568 $36,409 $456,836
22
11
Make or Buy
Transaction
Post Transaction
TOTAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Discount Factor
Discount Rate 5%
23
Session Objectives
24
12
Session Objectives
25
13
Session 6
Price and Cost Analysis
Session Agenda
1
Session Objectives
Session Objectives
2
Discussion Questions
Be prepared to discuss the following questions:
With respect to price assessment, which of the following have you used in
your organization: competitive price proposals, current price comparisons,
use of web tools, historical price comparisons and cost analysis?
Were there missed opportunities to use one or some of these methods?
What types of discounts does your organization typically receive?
What are some cases where your firm has procurement leverage? Where
it does not?
What sources of cost data has your organization used?
When have you been involved in a strategic supply project where direct
and indirect costs have been split?
What were some of the problems you faced, if any?
Are learning curves appropriate in your organization for some purchases?
Why?
o Quality
o Reliability
o Risk
o Other?
6
3
Price and Cost Analysis
• Price Assessment
¾ Methods:
o Competitive proposals
o Web tools
o Cost Analysis
4
Price and Cost Analysis
• Discounts:
¾ Cash
¾ Trade
¾ Volume
¾ Seasonal
10
5
Price and Cost Analysis
Negotiating
leverage
0
Number of Sellers
11
Negotiating
leverage
0
Number of Buyers
12
6
Price and Cost Analysis
13
¾ Cost Breakdown
¾ Other Firms
¾ Cost Models
14
7
Price and Cost Analysis
• Types of Costs:
¾ Direct
¾ +Indirect
= Total Cost
+ Profit
= Price
15
• Type of Costs:
¾ Direct
o Direct materials
o Direct labour
¾ Indirect
o Allocated (Burden)
Production overhead
Corporate overhead
16
8
Price and Cost Analysis
• Profit
¾ Considerations
o Competitiveness of industry
o Size of order
o Specialization/Customization
o Risk
17
18
9
Price and Cost Analysis
• Learning Curves
19
•DeHavilland Incorporated
20
10
Session Objectives
21
Session Objectives
22
11
Session 7
Quality and Inventory
Session Agenda
1
Session Objectives
Session Objectives
2
Session Objectives
Discussion Questions
Be prepared to discuss the following questions:
In your organization what quality issues have you experienced?
Refer to the four factors the determine long run quality. Which factors
were, or are, absent at your organization?
Do you partner with firms as a method to improve quality? Why or
why not?
Are you overly dependent on inspection for quality?
Should your organization provide quality management training to
purchasing staff?
Why does your organization hold inventory?
What inventory model or models does your firm use?
How does delivery affect the level of inventory your firm holds?
How do customer service requirements affect the level of inventory
your firm holds?
3
Quality and Inventory
¾ Specification quality
¾ Selecting Suppliers
¾ Supplier Understanding
¾ Monitoring
• Specification quality
¾ Absolutely
¾ In terms of need
¾ Conformance
• Selecting Suppliers
¾ Product Testing
¾ Proposal Analysis
4
Quality and Inventory
• Specification Quality
• Monitoring
¾ Defect detection
¾ Error/defect prevention
10
5
Quality and Inventory
11
12
6
Quality and Inventory
13
¾ Definition
¾ Demings
¾ Six Sigma
¾ ISO 9001:2000
14
7
Quality and Inventory
15
16
8
Quality and Inventory
17
¾In either case what are some of the problems that are likely to
occur?
¾If you were responsible how would you proceed through the
steps?
18
9
Quality and Inventory
19
20
10
Quality and Inventory
21
• Demand forecasting
¾ Qualitative models:
o Experts
o Customer feedback
o Delphi
¾ Quantitative models:
o Simple
o Moderately sophisticated
o Sophisticated
22
11
Quality and Inventory
• Inventory Models
¾ Periodic Review
23
• Inventory Models
High
Level of
Inventory
Low
Short Long
24
12
Quality and Inventory
• Inventory Models
High
Level of
Inventory
Low
Low High
Desired level of customer service
25
26
13
Session Objectives
27
Session Objectives
28
14
Session Objectives
29
15
Session 8
Supplier Selection
Session Agenda
1
Session Objectives
Session Objectives
2
Discussion Questions
Be prepared to discuss the following questions:
What methods do we use to find suppliers in our organization?
In selecting suppliers what type of evaluation system does your
organization use?
Does your organization have products that are routine order? Procedural
problem products? Performance problem products? Political outlay
products? What are they?
What are some of the risk, business desirable, and cost factors your
organization would consider in adopting the total cost approach?
For what goods and services has your organization single sourced?
What were the factors in the decision?
How do the power relationships change when we negotiate in a single
source situation?
What are some implications of reducing the number of suppliers your
organization uses?
Supplier Selection
3
Supplier Selection
3. Make a recommendation.
Supplier Selection
¾ Steps:
4
Supplier Selection
¾ Steps:
Supplier Selection
• Effect of Weighting
10
5
Supplier Selection
• Effect of Weighting
FIRM: A B C
Critirea
11
Supplier Selection
¾ Part 1
12
6
Supplier Selection
• Product Types
¾ Routine Order
¾ Procedural Problem
¾ Performance Problem
¾ Political Problem
13
Supplier Selection
¾ Steps:
14
7
Supplier Selection
¾ Steps:
o
15
Supplier Selection
¾ Steps:
o Decision Level
16
8
Supplier Selection
¾ Part 2
17
Supplier Selection
18
9
Supplier Selection
19
Supplier Selection
o Improved delivery
o Cost reduction
¾ Concerns:
o May overshoot
20
10
Supplier Selection
21
Session Objectives
22
11
Session Objectives
23
12
Session 9
Supplier Development and
Certification
Session Agenda
1
Session Objectives
Session Objectives
2
Discussion Questions
Be prepared to discuss the following questions:
Does your organization use strategic purchasing performance measures? If
so which ones?
If not, should it use them? Why?
What supplier development activities does your organization engage in?
How has supplier development affected your organization’s performance, if
at all?
Does your organization engage in supplier certification? Why or why not?
How has supplier certification affected your organization’s performance, if at
all?
What are some of the problems of certification? Have they occurred in your
organization?
Does your organization use product cycle times for supplier evaluation?
Why or why not?
Assume you are Alan Day and you have to consider the following
questions only:
3
Supplier Development and Certification
o Provide leadership.
4
Supplier Development and Certification
¾ Types of Measures
o Price/Cost
o Revenue
o Inventory
o Availability
¾ Types of Measures
o Quality
o Workforce
o Operational
o Customer satisfaction
o Supplier
10
5
Supplier Development and Certification
11
¾ Approaches
o Evaluation feedback
o Supplier visits at buyer
o Buyer visits at supplier
o Verbal or written requests to improve
o Future benefits
o Formal evaluation
o Supplier competition
12
6
Supplier Development and Certification
¾Approaches
o Current benefits
o Certification
o Achievement recognition
o Training and education
o Investment
13
• Supplier Development
14
7
Supplier Development and Certification
• Supplier Certification
¾ Objectives
o Promote cooperation
o Reduce # of suppliers
o Develop technology/products
o Other
15
• Supplier Certification
¾ Benefits
Objective Benefit
Improve Quality Lower rejection rates and reduced inspection
costs
Establish long term Contracts length increase, supplier change
relationships frequency decrease
Reduce price/cost The most prevalent result is no change in
price, where prices change, more often it is a
decrease than an increase
Improve on-time delivery The most common effect was improved on
time delivery, followed by no change in on-
time delivery.
Promote co-operation Co-operation improved significantly
16
8
Supplier Development and Certification
• Supplier Certification
¾ Benefits
Objective Benefit
Reduce Suppliers Significant reduction in the number of
suppliers
Develop In terms of technology sharing there was little
Technology/Product difference when it came to sharing technology
Development with all firms. With closely linked firms there
was greater sharing of technology with
certified firms. In terms of product
development, certifying firms were more
likely to involve suppliers in product
development.
17
18
9
Supplier Development and Certification
• Supplier Certification
¾ Steps
o Involving suppliers
19
• Supplier Certification
¾ Steps
o Measurement (Implementation)
o Agreement
o Maintenance
20
10
Supplier Development and Certification
21
22
11
Supplier Development and Certification
¾ Conclusions:
23
24
12
Session Objectives
25
Session Objectives
26
13
Session 10
Services Procurement
Session Agenda
1
Session Objectives
Session Objectives
2
Discussion Questions
Be prepared to discuss the following questions:
What types of services do we buy in our organization?
Services Procurement
¾ Less tangible
¾ Not storable
¾ Lower traceability
¾ More complex
3
Services Procurement
o Quantity purchases
o Price negotiation
Services Procurement
4
Services Procurement
Services Procurement
o Need recognition
o Need description
o Sourcing
o Supplier selection
o Ordering
o Monitoring
o Receipt and Inspection
o Payment
o Documentation
o Relationship management
Except
10
5
Services Procurement
11
Services Procurement
12
6
Services Procurement
¾ 13
Spend Analysis
14
7
Spend Analysis
15
Spend Analysis
16
8
Services Procurement
• Spend Analysis
17
Services Procurement
18
9
Services Procurement
¾ Provide background
¾ Describe objectives
¾ Describe deliverables
19
Services Procurement
¾ Other matters
20
10
Services Procurement
Services Procurement
¾ Start up
22
11
Services Procurement
23
Services Procurement
24
12
Session Objectives
25
Session Objectives
26
13
Session 11
e-Procurement
Session Agenda
1
Session Objectives
Session Objectives
2
Discussion Questions
Be prepared to discuss the following questions:
What forms of e-procurement do you use in your
organization?
Should you use more? What would be the advantages?
they?
What issues need to be considered in upgrading BAL’s
procurement platform?
Is the company’s size important?
3
e-Procurement
e-Procurement
• Forms of e-procurement
¾ e-catalogs
¾ e-marketplaces
¾ e-auctions
4
e-Procurement
e-Procurement
• Advantages of e-procurement
¾ improved collaboration
¾ speed
¾ more sources
¾ lower costs
10
5
e-Procurement
• Advantages of e-procurement
¾ customization
11
e-Procurement
• Disadvantages of e-procurement
¾ security
12
6
e-Procurement
• Disadvantages of e-procurement
¾ resistance to change
13
e-Procurement
¾ Software
o Installed
o Net Marketplaces
14
7
e-Procurement
¾ Net Markets
o Openness
o Focus
o Consortium or Independent
15
e-Procurement
¾ Content Aggregation
o Terminology
o Many aggregators
o Complex requirements
16
8
e-Procurement
¾ Intelligent agents
17
e-Procurement
• Implementing e-procurement
¾ So something, do it soon
9
e-Procurement
• Implementing e-procurement
19
e-Procurement
20
10
e-Procurement
• Reverse auctions
¾ Steps
21
e-Procurement
• Reverse auctions
¾ Issues
22
11
e-Procurement
23
e-Procurement
24
12
e-Procurement
25
e-Procurement
26
13
e-Procurement
27
Session Objectives
28
14
Session Objectives
29
15
Session 12
Involving Users and Suppliers
Session Agenda
• P-Cards: benefits
• P- Cards: considerations in implementation
• Vendor (Supplier) managed inventory
• Just in Time
• Just in Time II
• Course wrap up
• Discuss module exam requirements
1
Session Objectives
Session Objectives
2
Discussion Questions
Be prepared to discuss the following questions:
Are p-cards used in your organization?
If they are used what steps did you go through in the implementation?
What were the cost savings?
What were the potential risks?
Does your organization use vendor managed inventory? Why?
Should your organization be using vendor managed inventory?
What would be the benefits of vendor managed inventory for your
organization?
What steps would your organization take in implementing vendor
managed inventory?
What are the strategic and tactical changes I will make (or attempt to
make) to my job/department/organization?
What is the one most important thing I learned?
• Benefits of P-cards
¾ Speed
¾ Information availability
¾ Employee morale
¾ Supplier goodwill
¾ Cost savings
3
Involving Users and Suppliers
2. Organizational issues
3. Integration issues
4. Implementation issues
¾ Who
¾ Dollar limits
¾ Item types
¾ Other
4
Involving Users and Suppliers
• Organizational Issues
¾ Encouraging use
• Integration Issues
• Implementation Issues
¾ Challenges
10
5
Involving Users and Suppliers
11
12
6
Involving Users and Suppliers
¾ Supplier Benefits:
o Partnering
o Long term relationships
o Smoothing demand
¾ Buyer Benefits:
13
¾ Steps in Implementation
o Analysis
o Gaining support
o Negotiation
o Development
o Testing
o Implementation
o Improvement
14
7
Involving Users and Suppliers
15
16
8
Involving Users and Suppliers
• JIT II
17
• JIT II
18
9
Involving Users and Suppliers
• JIT II
19
20
10
Involving Users and Suppliers
21
Session Objectives
11
Session Objectives
23
24
12