NLOG GS PUB 9970 EDMP-87607-V1-K5-13 Final End Well Report

Ref.
: 87607
Version: 1
K5-13 End of Well Report
Date issued: Feb 2008
E&P Nederland B.V. Page: 2 of 47
DISTRIBUTION LIST
Partners
ENERGIE BEHEER NEDERLAND B.V. Mr. J. Dirk Bokhoven PDF

GOAL PETROLEUM (NETHERLANDS) B.V. Mr. R. Kuijper PDF
ROSEWOOD EXPLORATION LTD. Mr. M. Malinowsky PDF
Total E&P Paris

DGEP/EN/GSR Mr. H. Clemencon abstract
DGEP/EN/TEC Mr. J. Hervochon abstract
DGEP/GSR/CAE Mr. C. Mathieu / P. Melas 1 copy (PDF)
DGEP/GSR/VDG Mr. J-P. Maret 1 copy (PDF)
DGEP/TDO/FPL/Operations Paris Mr. M. Raimond 1 copy (PDF)
DGEP/TDO/FPL/Methodes Docs. Mr. D. Mathorel / Mrs. M. Leroix 1 copy (PDF)
Total E&P Pau

DGEP/GSR/COP Mr. B. Simon / P. Baudot 1 copy (PDF)
DGEP/TDO/FP/Operations Pau Mr. C. Baranthol 1 copy (PDF)
DGEP/GSR/ASI/GDM Mrs. T. Texier 1 copy (PDF)
Total E&P Nederland

Archives Mr. H. Driessen 1 copy + original
DM5 access to user
Ref.: 87607
Version: 1
CONTENTS
1. GENERALITIES .............................................................................................................................................6
1.1. GENERAL SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................................6
1.1.1. History and Available Data ..............................................................................................................6
1.1.1. Well Objectives ................................................................................................................................6
1.1.2. Well Duration & Operations .............................................................................................................7
1.1.3. Main Results : ..................................................................................................................................7
1.2. GENERAL WELL DATA ................................................................................................................................8
1.2.1. Location ...........................................................................................................................................8
1.2.2. Classification....................................................................................................................................9
1.2.3. Rig....................................................................................................................................................9
1.2.4. Well Head Location..........................................................................................................................9
1.2.5. Depth Data.......................................................................................................................................9
1.2.6. Partnership.......................................................................................................................................9
1.2.7. Target Data ....................................................................................................................................10
1.2.8. Historic ...........................................................................................................................................10
1.2.9. Well TD ..........................................................................................................................................10
1.2.10. Cost..............................................................................................................................................10
1.2.11. Contractors ..................................................................................................................................11
1.2.12. WellSite Geologists......................................................................................................................11
2. DRILLING.....................................................................................................................................................12
2.1. DRILLING SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................12
2.1.1. Well Design....................................................................................................................................12
2.1.2. Drilling Phase Description..............................................................................................................13
2.2. RIG TIME ANALYSIS .................................................................................................................................15
2.3. DEVIATION DATA......................................................................................................................................16
2.4. DRILLING PRESSURE TEST .......................................................................................................................19
3. MUDLOGGING.............................................................................................................................................20
2.5. MAIN MUD LOGGING ASPECTS .................................................................................................................20
2.6. GENERAL INFORMATION ...........................................................................................................................20
2.6.1. Mud Logging Unit Type..................................................................................................................20
2.6.2. Database Sampling Rate ...............................................................................................................20
2.6.3. Mud Logging Sensors ....................................................................................................................20
2.6.4. Gas System Description ................................................................................................................21
2.6.5. Sample Collection ..........................................................................................................................23
4. HYDROCARBON SHOWS ..........................................................................................................................24
4.1. SHOWS DESCRIPTION ..............................................................................................................................24
4.1.1. Gas Shows.....................................................................................................................................24
4.1.2. Oil Shows.......................................................................................................................................24
5. MUD ANALYSIS ..........................................................................................................................................25
5.1. MUD HISTORICAL SUMMARY .....................................................................................................................25
5.2. MUD ANALYSIS ........................................................................................................................................26
5.3. MUD SAMPLE EXPEDITION ........................................................................................................................26
6. LWD/MWD....................................................................................................................................................27
6.1. LWD SUMMARY.......................................................................................................................................27
6.2. LIST OF RECORDED LOGS ........................................................................................................................27
6.3. LWD EVALUATION ...................................................................................................................................27
5.4. LWD/MWD COST ...................................................................................................................................27
Ref.: 87607
Version: 1
7. WIRELINE LOGGING ..................................................................................................................................28

7.1. WIRELINE LOGGING SUMMARY .................................................................................................................28
7.2. LIST OF WIRELINE RECORDED LOGS .........................................................................................................28
7.3. DATA PROCESSING AND ANALYSIS............................................................................................................28
7.4. FORMATION TEMPERATURE EVALUATION ..................................................................................................29
7.5. WIRELINE LOGGING COST ........................................................................................................................29
8. WIRELINE FORMATION TESTING.............................................................................................................30
8.1. WIRELINE FORMATION TESTING SUMMARY................................................................................................30
8.2. PRESSURE DATA .....................................................................................................................................30
8.3. WATER HEAD X-PLOT ..............................................................................................................................31
8.4. WIRELINE FORMATION SAMPLING .............................................................................................................32
9. SIDEWALL CORING ...................................................................................................................................33
9.1. SIDEWALL CORING SUMMARY...................................................................................................................34
9.2. SIDEWALL CORE DATA .............................................................................................................................34
10. STRATIGRAPHIC AND STRUCTURAL RESULTS..................................................................................37
10.1. STRATIGRAPHIC & STRUCTURAL RESULTS SUMMARY ...............................................................................37
10.2. MARKER CHARTS ..................................................................................................................................37
10.3. LITHOLOGY ............................................................................................................................................38
11. PETROPHYSICAL ANALYSIS..................................................................................................................44
11.1. PETROPHYSICAL ANALYSIS ....................................................................................................................44
11.2. LOG INTERPRETATION PARAMETERS .......................................................................................................44
11.3. RESERVOIR CHART ................................................................................................................................46
12. DRILL STEM TESTING .............................................................................................................................47
Ref.: 87607
Version: 1
LIST OF FIGURES
Enclosure-1 : K5-13, Location Map

Enclosure-2 : K5-13, Progress Chart
Enclosure-3 : K5-13, Litholog 1/500
Enclosure-4 : K5-13, Final Composite log 1/500
Enclosure-5 : K5-13, Logging Supervision Report
Enclosure-6 : K5-13, Abandonment chart
Enclosure-7 : K5-13, Multimin Quantitative Interpretation Log
Ref.: 87607
Version: 1
1. Generalities
1.1. General Summary
1.1.1. History and Available Data
The K5b license was awarded to NAM during the 4th round in 1979. The operatorship was awarded to Total
in 1995 following the transfer of 50 % of NAM’s rights to the company. In November 1996, the K5b
Production license was granted with EBN participating for 50% and in 1997 NAM farmed-out their remaining
interests to Occidental and Rosewood.
The interests of the partners of the K5b licence are now the following:
Production Licence K5b

In force 07.11.1996
Expiry date 06.11.2021
Total E&P Nederland B.V. 25 %
Energie Beheer Nederland B.V. 50 %
Rosewood Exploration Ltd. 4.7269 %
Goal Petroleum (Netherlands) B.V. 20.2731 %
5 wells have been drilled in K5b, 4 exploration wells and recently one long reach production well K5-EC5
• K5-1: Pennzoil 1974 (discovery K5-C field)
• K5-2: NAM 1982 (discovery K5-C North field)
• K4-8: ELF Petroland 1995 (now K4-A3, part of the K4/K5 Unit)
• K5-12: TOTALFINAELF 2002 (discovery K5b-U field)
• K5-EC5: TEPNL 2005 (development well to drain the Northern part of K5-C Unit)
In this study four additional wells in the vicinity of K5b have been analysed to assess the regional geological
model:
• K1-2: NAM 1979 which exhibited gas shows in a degraded Slochteren
• K3-2: ARCO 1990 with water in Westphalian and gas shows in Slochteren
• K1-5: Wintershall 2006 – with water in Westphalian and possible gas in a highly degraded Lower
Slochteren.
1.1.2. Well Objectives
The main objective of the well K5-13 was to evaluate the hydrocarbon potential of the Lower Slochteren
Sandstones, in the K5b-S1 panel. Results were expected to be analogous to K5-12 well. The basal part of
the Lower Slochteren was expected to exhibit good reservoir properties in eolian sandstones. The upper
section was expected to consist of damp to dry interdune to fluvial flood plain deposits.
Possible reservoirs may be encountered in the Carboniferous Lower Westphalian B (WLB2) fluvial sand
reservoirs. These reservoirs are not targeted as additional objectives of the well.
Expected resources for the Lower Slochteren were: 0.8 – 1.2 – 2.4 GNm3 (mini – mode – maxi).
Ref.: 87607
Version: 1
1.1.3. Well Duration & Operations

Well K5-13 was spudded on the 21st of April 2007.The maximum depth of 4005m (-3959.75.m TVDSS) in the
Westphalian was reached on 03rd of June 2007 after 44 drilling days.
Duration of the well was 57 days with the end of operations on the 16/06/2007, including 6 days moving
before actual spud.
1.1.4. Main Results :

The targeted Lower Slochteren Sandstone reservoirs were penetrated between 3879.4m MD / -3834.2m
TVDSS and 3925.35m MD / -3880.14m TVDSS with an angle of 0.83º, unfortunately the reservoirs were
water bearing.
In compliance with the Dutch Regulations and Total in-house Company rules, the well was permanently
abandoned after setting five cement plugs.
Ref.: 87607
Version: 1
1.2. General Well Data

1.2.1. Location
Company : TOTAL Subsidiary : Total E&P Nederland B.V. Country : Netherlands
Licence : K5b Prospect : K5b-S1 Environment : SHELF
Well Name : K5-13 Well Abb : K5-13
Platform : N/A Slot Number : Exploration
K5b License location Fig. 1
K5b
K5-13
K4/K5 Unit
Legend K4/K5 Unit

Developed Field
Upside3P
Main prospects
Undeveloped Field
Fig.1 Location Map

Ref.: 87607
Version: 1
1.2.2. Classification
Well Class: Exploration Well Type: Vertical Vertical Trajectory: Vertical Well
Well Status: P&A KOP: Vertical Well
Maximum Angle: 2.11° at
4005 m
Risk: - Destabilisation of Tertiairy claystones. Mean Azimuth: SW
- Unstable Vlieland shales
1.2.3. Rig
Rig Name: Ensco 72 Rig Type: Jack-up
1.2.4. Well Head Location

Geographical Coordinates Rectangular Coordinates
Geodesic Datum: ED 50/TM CM E5N Projection: Transverse Mercator UTM
Spheroid: International (Hayford, 1909) Central Meridian: 5°E
Origin of Longitudes: Greenwich
Latitude: 53°49' 10.930'' N Northing: 5964497.6 mN
Longitude 03°36' 02.331” E Easting: 407875.5 mE
1.2.5. Depth Data

Water depth: -36 MSL
Logging Depth Origin: RT Drilling Depth Origin: RT
RT Elevation: 44.84 MSL Flow Line Elevation: M
Altimetry Datum: MSL
1.2.6. Partnership
Operator Partner Working Interest Paying Interest
Total E&P Nederland B.V. 25.00% 25.00%
EBN B.V. 50.00% 50.00%
Goal 20.27% 20.27%
Rosewood 4.73% 4.73%
Ref.: 87607
Version: 1
1.2.7. Target Data
Stage/Formation: Permian / Lower Slochteren Sandstone.
The reservoir consists of eolian and fluvial sandstones of Permian age.

There was only one target:
Lower Slochteren Sandstone.
Depth MD: 3879.4m MD Depth TVDSS: -3834.2 m Fluid: WATER
Target Latitude: 53 °49' 10.400" N Target Northing: 5964482.0 mN

Target Longitude: 03 °36' 01.200" E Target Easting: 407853.8 mE
Inclination at 0.83°
Target:
Departure at 26.74m Mean Azimuth at 238.86º
Target: Target:
1.2.8. Historic
On Location Date: 15 April 2007 End of Operations Date: 16 June 2007
Spud Date: 21 April 2007 Off Location Date: 16 June 2007
Sidetracked: N/A Actual Drilling Duration: 44 day (s)
End of Drilling Date: 03 June 2007 Total Duration: 63 day (s)
1.2.9. Well TD
TD Driller MD: 4005 m TD Logger MD: 4008 m
TD Driller TVDSS: -3959.75 m TD Logger TVDSS: -3962.75 m
TD Stage/Formation: Carboniferous
Westphalian B
TD Driller Latitude: 53° 49' 10.3"N TD Driller Northing: 5964479.80 mN
TD Driller Longitude: 03 ° 36' 01.1"E TD Driller Easting: 407852.25 mE
Departure at TD: 28.92m Mean Azimuth: SW
Angle at TD: 2.11 ° Azimuth at TD: 214.19°
1.2.10. Cost
Estimated Cost : 20.8 M Euros
Actual Cost : 18.9 M Euros
Ref.: 87607
Version: 1
1.2.11. Contractors
Contract Company
RIG : Ensco 72
Mud Logging : Geoservices
Mud Engineering : MI Drilling Fluid
Directional Drilling : Baker Hughes Inteq
LWD : Baker Hughes Inteq
MWD : Baker Hughes Inteq
Wireline : Schlumberger Electrical Logging
Cement : Halliburton Cementing
Testing : Expro Well Testing
Casing Services: Weatherford
1.2.12. WellSite Geologists

Name Company Top Depth Bot Depth Date in Date out
Gregory N. Crook STAG 0m 1445 m 19/04/07 03/05/07
Erik Jan Kruyswijk DTN 1445 m 3380 m 03/05/07 17/05/07
A. Flahaut (trainee) TOTAL 1445 m 2935 m 26/04/07 10/05/07
Gregory N. Crook STAG 3380 m 3800 m 17/05/07 01/06/07
Erik Jan Kruyswijk DTN 3800 m 4005 m 03/05/07 08/06/07
A. Camoin (trainee) TOTAL 3586 m 4005 m 24/05/07 08/06/07
Ref.: 87607
Version: 1
2. Drilling
2.1. Drilling Summary
2.1.1. Well Design
Structure of K5-13
Ref.: 87607
Version: 1
2.1.2. Drilling Phase Description
Hole TD Driller Hole TD Hanger Driller

Hole Size Casing Diameter Shoe Driller (MD) Cement
(MD) Logger (MD) (MD)
30” 0m - 30'' 132m -
17 ½’’ 1445m - 13 3/8” 1437m - surface
12 ¼” 3500m - 9 5/8” 3491m - 825 m
8 ½’’ 3586m - 7’’ 3581 m 3388 m 3388 m
5 7/8” 4005m 4008m
The jack-up Ensco 72 came on contract for the K4-A5 well at 20:30hrs on the 10th of July 2006. The rig
reached the K5-13 location on the 16th of April 2007. The well K5-13 was spud on 21st of April 2007.
K5-13
30” Conductor Pipe
The objective was to drive the 30” CP vertically to a minimum of 30m or refusal. 132m was achieved with 52
penetration (weight of hammer: 16 tons).
The excess 30” conductor was cut and laid down, and then the diverter overshot was nippled up.
Drilling Phase 17 1/2” and 13 3/8” casing (14 days)
A rotary assembly, with 17 ½” rock bit was picked up to drill out the 30” casing shoe
Drilling commenced in rotary mode from 132m with 1.10 SG spudmud/SW polymer. The first 50m were
drilled on reduced parameters to avoid washing out the shoe. At 807 m the mud system was displaced with a
1.16 sg KCL-Polymer-Glydrill mud system. The mud weight was increased gradually with depth and a final
mud weight of 1.32 SG was achieved. Drilling stopped at 1445m section TD.
The casing was run in hole to 893 m, then washed down to 987m. At 987m the hole packed off and the
casing got stuck. The circulation could be regained and the casing was pulled out to surface.
A wiper trip while opening hole to 19” was done, the trip show large amount of caving and confirmed that
keeping the mud weight in a range from 1.30 to 1.32 SG was not enough. The mud weight was raised to
1.35 SG which gave a better wellbore stability.
Finally, the 13 3/8” casing was run and the shoe was set at 1437m and cemented as per programme.
Drilling Phase 12 1/4” and 9 5/8” casing (18 days)
A steerable BHA, with a MWD directional/gamma tool and rock bit was picked up to drill out the 13 3/8”
casing shoe and 5m of new formation to 1450m. An FIT to 1.50 SG EMW was performed. However the
formation was not fractured, the pressure leaked off and did not stabilize.
Drilling however started with a tri-cone insert bit in the cherty chalk. After entering the clean chalk at around
1850m, the bit was pulled out at 1920m and changed with a PDC bit. Drilling continued through the clean
chalk to a depth of 2934m where some traces of cherts were found. The BHA was pulled out to surface and
make up and with new tri-cone insert bit to drill the lower chert in Ommelanden chalk formation.
Drilling then continued in rotary mode from 2934 to 2980m, at which depth the string washed out, and bottom
BHA (±101m) was lost in hole. The remainder of the string was pulled out to surface and fishing operations
had to be done. The fish was engaged and brought to surface successfully.
A new bi-cone insert bit, MWD tools, motor, jar and accelerator were picked and run in hole. Drilling then
continued from 2980 to 3086m, at which depth the bit was pulled out, due to low ROP (2m/hr). The next tri-
Ref.: 87607
Version: 1
cone bit made it through the chert section and was pulled out at 3149m after having penetrate the Texel
Formation at 3141m.
A PDC bit was picked up and drill from 3149 to 3380m. The MW was displaced to 1.25 SG at 3149m and
then to 1.30 SG prior to enter the Vlieland Formation at 3304m. The ROP dropped dramatically at around
3372m and at 3380m and the decision was made to POOH. At the surface it appeared that the bit was balled
up. The same bit was re-run and drilling continued to section TD at 3500m with several intervals of low ROP.
Several unsuccessfull attempts were made to clean the bit by pumping nutplug pills.
The 9 5/8” casing was run and cemented without problems to 3491m.
Drilling Phase 8 1/2” (5 days)
A rotary assembly, with 8 ½” PDC bit was picked up to drill out the 9 5/8” casing shoe. 3m of new formation
were drilled and an FIT to 1.95 SG EMW was successfully done. At 3560m, the ROP was voluntarily reduced
to 3 m/hr until the top of the Basal Zechstein Carbonates was encountered. The section TD was set at
3586m, 4 m inside the Basal Zechstein Carbonate.
The 7” Liner was run to 3586m where TD was tagged. Subsequently the liner was pulled back to the planned
shoe depth of 3581m. The hanger was set, but the running tool could not be unlatched. After several
attempts to unlatch, the liner was pulled out to surface and the hanger was replaced. The liner was RIH
again and successfully set, with the shoe at 3581m and the hanger at 3388m. The liner was cemented
without problems.
Drilling Phase 5 7/8” (7 days)
A 5 7/8” rotary assembly with a new PDC bit and a GR-Res LWD was picked up and drilled from 3581m to
3731 m, where a strong building tendency was met. A round trip was performed to pick up a motor assembly
to adjust the wellpath.
The string was RIH again and drilling continued. At 3850m, control drilling operations commenced with a
constant ROP of 3m/hr in the claystone, in order to identify the coring depth by a positive drilling break
(expected when penetrating the sandstone). A low WOB was required in order to achieve a ROP of 3m/hrs in
the claystone. Due to the lack of clear drilling breaks, several depths were picked for circulation bottom up
based on GR offset well correlation. The reservoir sandstones were identified, but the gas readings were
disappointing and coring was cancelled. Normal drilling resumed from 3897m and continued to 4005m (Final
TD) which was reached without problems.
The string was pulled to surface; slight overpull was met when the BHA passed the 7” liner shoe.
Wireline logging operation was then carried out and 4 runs were performed:
- run# 1.1.1 HRLA-APS-HNGS-PEX

- run# 1.1.2 XPT-DSI
- run# 1.1.3 MSCT
- run# 1.1.4 CBL-VDL (inside 9 5/8” casing)
After the rig down of Schlumberger equipment, the well was permanently abandoned with 5 cement plugs.
Ref.: 87607
Version: 1
Abandonement
Five cement plugs have been set for permanent well abandonment as follows:
Cement plug-1 3870 – 3645 m (1.93 SG, G-cement slurry)

Cement plug-2 3640 – 3320 m (1.93 SG, G-cement slurry)
Cement plug-3 3300 – 3150 m (1.90 SG, cement slurry)
See enclosure 6 for detail.
The Ensco-72 finally was released on Saturday, 16 June 2007.
2.2. Rig Time Analysis
PT/NPT distribution for K5-13
WOW
All NPTs
3.0%
13.5%
All NPTs
PT
83.5% PT
WOW
The detailed NPT’s is as follows:
Run 13 3/8” casing : 126.4 hrs (8.50%)

Drilling 12 ¼” phase : 38.5 hrs (2.60%)
Run 7” liner : 32.0 hrs (2.2%)
Drilling 5 7/8” phase : 3.5 hrs (0.20%)
Wait on Weather : 45.6 hrs (3%)
NPT experienced on K5-13 well amounts to 13.5% of well duration corresponding to 8.3 days NPT (does not
include 1.9 days of waiting on weather prior to moving out from location) for 63 days total duration.
Ref.: 87607
Version: 1
2.3. Deviation Data

Well Head Rectangular Coordinates:
Easting : 407 875.5 E
Northing : 5 964 497.6 N Type of Projection : Transverse Mercator UTM
Log depth Origin : RT Driller Depth Origin : RT

Log Depth Origin above MSL : -44.84m Driller Depth Origin above MSL : -44.84m
Total Measured depth : 4005m MD/RT

Total Vertical depth : -3959.75 TVDMSL
Method used for the TVD calculation: Minimum Radius of Curvature
Wellpath K5-13
Magnetic References
Magnetic North is 1.05°W of True North.
Grid North is 1.13°W of True North.
Magnetic North is 0.08°W of Grid North
Gyro measurements are referenced to the True North. The gyro type surveys are converted to Grid North
by subtracting 1.13°.
MWD measurements are referenced to the Magnetic North. The MWD surveys are converted to Grid North
by subtracting 0.08°.
Section Top depth Bottom depth Tool

17 ½” 0 1390 Gyro
12 ¼” 1445 3500 Navigamma , Gr from 3100m.
Ref.: 87607
Version: 1
8 ½” 3500 3586 Navigamma

5 7/8” 3586 3731 Ontrak Gr-Res-Dir-PWD
5 7/8” 3731 4005 Ontrak Gr-Res-Dir-PWD
Projection to bit 4005
All the surveys, which are listed below, are referenced to the Grid North.
K5-13
Deviation Data Table K5-13
Type MD Inc Azi TVD TVDSS Easting Northing
Gyro 0.00 0.000 0.000 0.000 44.84 0.000 0.000
Gyro 25.00 0.090 241.440 25.000 19.84 -0.017 -0.009
Gyro 50.00 0.110 217.580 50.000 -5.16 -0.049 -0.038
Gyro 75.00 0.220 262.670 75.000 -30.16 -0.111 -0.063
Gyro 100.00 0.410 276.270 99.999 -55.16 -0.248 -0.059
Gyro 125.00 0.190 252.500 124.999 -80.16 -0.376 -0.062
Gyro 150.00 0.160 216.840 149.999 -105.16 -0.437 -0.102
Gyro 175.00 0.130 224.710 174.999 -130.16 -0.478 -0.150
Gyro 200.00 0.190 230.770 199.999 -155.16 -0.530 -0.197
Gyro 225.00 0.230 232.810 224.999 -180.16 -0.602 -0.253
Gyro 250.00 0.170 247.020 249.999 -205.16 -0.676 -0.298
Gyro 275.00 0.260 272.390 274.998 -230.16 -0.767 -0.310
Gyro 300.00 0.200 285.610 299.998 -255.16 -0.865 -0.296
Gyro 325.00 0.220 297.770 324.998 -280.16 -0.950 -0.262
Gyro 350.00 0.230 279.490 349.998 -305.16 -1.042 -0.231
Gyro 375.00 0.230 302.980 374.998 -330.16 -1.133 -0.196
Gyro 400.00 0.230 305.540 399.997 -355.16 -1.216 -0.139
Gyro 425.00 0.250 284.410 424.997 -380.16 -1.310 -0.097
Gyro 450.00 0.270 289.730 449.997 -405.16 -1.418 -0.063
Gyro 475.00 0.330 292.390 474.997 -430.16 -1.540 -0.016
Gyro 500.00 0.370 302.640 499.996 -455.16 -1.675 0.055
Gyro 525.00 0.350 310.390 524.996 -480.16 -1.801 0.148
Gyro 550.00 0.360 311.160 549.995 -505.16 -1.918 0.249
Gyro 575.00 0.340 318.820 574.995 -530.15 -2.026 0.357
Gyro 600.00 0.320 312.320 599.994 -555.15 -2.127 0.460
Gyro 625.00 0.290 317.030 624.994 -580.15 -2.221 0.553
Gyro 650.00 0.260 339.020 649.994 -605.15 -2.285 0.652
Gyro 675.00 0.200 313.540 674.993 -630.15 -2.337 0.735
Gyro 700.00 0.200 304.690 699.993 -655.15 -2.404 0.790
Gyro 725.00 0.190 282.050 724.993 -680.15 -2.481 0.824
Gyro 750.00 0.230 291.650 749.993 -705.15 -2.568 0.851
Gyro 775.00 0.240 309.130 774.993 -730.15 -2.655 0.902
Gyro 800.00 0.220 307.730 799.993 -755.15 -2.734 0.965
Gyro 825.00 0.260 310.660 824.992 -780.15 -2.815 1.031
Gyro 850.00 0.220 323.260 849.992 -805.15 -2.887 1.106
Gyro 875.00 0.260 332.720 874.992 -830.15 -2.941 1.195
Gyro 900.00 0.200 295.630 899.992 -855.15 -3.007 1.265
Gyro 925.00 0.130 297.900 924.992 -880.15 -3.071 1.297
Gyro 950.00 0.190 243.610 949.992 -905.15 -3.133 1.292
Gyro 975.00 0.190 252.120 974.991 -930.15 -3.210 1.260
Gyro 1000.00 0.290 277.700 999.991 -955.15 -3.312 1.256
Gyro 1025.00 0.370 297.450 1024.991 -980.15 -3.446 1.302
Gyro 1050.00 0.260 306.600 1049.990 -1005.15 -3.563 1.373
Gyro 1075.00 0.110 333.430 1074.990 -1030.15 -3.620 1.428
Gyro 1100.00 0.040 181.080 1099.990 -1055.15 -3.631 1.441
Gyro 1125.00 0.080 154.830 1124.990 -1080.15 -3.623 1.416
Gyro 1150.00 0.120 274.500 1149.990 -1105.15 -3.642 1.403
Gyro 1175.00 0.130 238.760 1174.990 -1130.15 -3.692 1.390
Gyro 1200.00 0.150 207.860 1199.990 -1155.15 -3.732 1.346
Gyro 1225.00 0.140 179.440 1224.990 -1180.15 -3.747 1.287
Gyro 1250.00 0.170 171.160 1249.990 -1205.15 -3.741 1.220
Gyro 1275.00 0.230 208.470 1274.990 -1230.15 -3.759 1.139
Ref.: 87607
Version: 1
Gyro 1300.00 0.240 219.910 1299.990 -1255.15 -3.817 1.055

Gyro 1325.00 0.240 234.210 1324.989 -1280.15 -3.893 0.984
Gyro 1350.00 0.180 156.390 1349.989 -1305.15 -3.919 0.917
Gyro 1375.00 0.260 53.740 1374.989 -1330.15 -3.858 0.915
Gyro 1389.93 0.330 55.140 1389.919 -1345.08 -3.795 0.959
MWD 1475.50 0.34 135.46 1475.49 -1430.15 -3.42 0.92
MWD 1504.00 0.27 100.51 1503.99 -1459.15 -3.29 0.85
MWD 1562.00 0.51 136.11 1561.99 -1517.15 -2.98 0.64
MWD 1591.00 0.20 172.70 1590.99 -1546.15 -2.89 0.49
MWD 1620.00 0.39 178.86 1619.99 -1575.15 -2.88 0.34
MWD 1648.00 0.31 133.62 1647.99 -1603.14 -2.82 0.20
MWD 1737.00 0.63 135.43 1736.98 -1692.14 -2.31 -0.32
MWD 1853.00 0.72 132.15 1852.97 -1808.13 -1.32 -1.26
MWD 1909.00 0.54 135.04 1908.97 -1864.13 -0.87 -1.69
MWD 1937.13 0.79 130.64 1937.10 -1892.13 -0.63 -1.91
MWD 2025.00 0.77 145.23 2024.96 -1980.12 0.16 -2.78
MWD 2112.00 0.51 146.38 2111.96 -2067.11 0.71 -3.58
MWD 2200.00 0.76 198.21 2199.95 -2155.11 0.75 -4.46
MWD 2286.00 0.87 228.38 2285.94 -2241.10 0.08 -5.44
MWD 2374.00 0.87 238.84 2373.93 -2329.09 -0.99 -6.23
MWD 2462.00 0.97 242.98 2461.92 -2417.08 -2.22 -6.91
MWD 2548.00 1.08 254.93 2547.91 -2503.07 -3.65 -7.45
MWD 2636.00 0.75 232.04 2635.90 -2591.06 -4.91 -8.02
MWD 2723.00 0.85 251.48 2722.89 -2678.05 -5.96 -8.58
MWD 2811.00 0.67 242.53 2810.88 -2766.04 -7.04 -9.02
MWD 2899.00 1.04 242.58 2898.87 -2854.03 -8.21 -9.63
MWD 2956.00 1.03 229.17 2955.86 -2911.02 -9.05 -10.20
MWD 3039.00 0.27 199.16 3038.86 -2994.02 -9.68 -10.87
MWD 3067.00 0.16 203.57 3066.86 -3022.02 -9.72 -10.97
MWD 3126.00 0.07 146.84 3125.86 -3081.02 -9.73 -11.07
MWD 3216.00 0.22 220.76 3215.86 -3171.02 -9.82 -11.25
MWD 3303.00 0.44 253.43 3302.85 -3258.01 -10.24 -11.47
MWD 3392.00 0.68 224.64 3391.85 -3347.01 -10.94 -11.94
MWD 3478.00 0.61 221.27 3477.84 -3433.00 -11.60 -12.65
MWD 3578.00 0.73 222.82 3577.84 -3533.00 -12.38 -13.51
MWD 3609.00 1.11 256.84 3608.83 -3565.99 -12.81 -13.73
MWD 3641.00 1.53 263.03 3640.82 -3595.99 -13.53 -13.85
MWD 3668.00 2.03 266.51 3667.81 -3622.97 -14.37 -13.92
MWD 3696.00 3.03 261.64 3695.78 -3650.95 -15.6 -14.02
MWD 3720.00 4.46 253.83 3719.73 -3674.89 -17.12 -14.41
MWD 3743.00 3.55 258.79 3742.68 -3697.84 -18.68 -14.8
MWD 3771.00 1.55 265.43 3770.65 -3725.81 -19.9 -15
MWD 3798.00 0.7 239.28 3797.64 -3752.80 -20.39 -15.11
MWD 3827.00 0.75 245.87 3826.64 -3781.80 -20.72 -15.28
MWD 3858.00 0.78 241.3 3857.64 -3812.80 -21.09 -15.46
MWD 3884.00 0.83 237.86 3883.63 -3838.80 -21.41 -15.65
MWD 3946.00 1.18 225.17 3945.62 -3900.79 -22.24 -16.34
MWD 3974.00 1.83 217.58 3973.62 -3928.78 -22.6 -16.84
MWD 3986.00 2.11 214.19 3985.62 -3940.77 -22.84 -17.18
Projected 4005.00 2.348 209.78 4004.59 -3959.75 -23.23 -17.18
Projected 4008.00* 2.348 209.78 4007.59 -3962.75 -23.21 -17.19
* TD logger
17 ½” section - 132 to 1445 m MD/RT

After drilling the 17 ½” section, the well path was measured by Gyro from 0-1390m.
12 1/4" section – 1445 m to 3500 m MD/RT
During the 12 1/4" drilling phase, well deviation was measured by a BHI MWD tool from 1445 to 3392m.
Down to 1562m, a survey was taken every stand (ca. 30m). Below this depth the survey interval was
Ref.: 87607
Version: 1
increased to 3 stands (ca. 90m) to a depth of 3500m. The inclination was kept to more a less vertical. An
attempt to slide in the Ommelanden Chalk formation, with bit #3(PDC;HCM605S) was not successful due to
low ROP and high reactive torque.
The Gamma sensor was activated at 3100m.
During the 8 1/2" drilling phase, well deviation was measured by a MWD-tool from 3500 to 3586m.
The well was drilled with a rotary assembly down to 3731m. At this depth it was noticed that the inclination
built too fast (1.71°/30m). The rotary assembly was pulled out and changed for a motor assembly. Drilling
continued and the well was steered back to vertical. The TD was reached as per programme.
2.4. Drilling Pressure Test

Depth mMD Depth mTVDBRT Max. rec Leak off Pressure
MW EMW at
Type Date Pressure
TD shoe TD shoe (sg) At TD At shoe TD (sg)
(bar)
Performed 1.5 sg. Test failed
FIT 05/05/07 1450 1437 1449.99 1436.99 1.35 21.7 pressure decreased 2.8
bars/10min. No stabilization.
FIT 23/05/07 3503 3491 3502.80 3490.80 1.7 88 n/a n/a 1.95
Ref.: 87607
Version: 1
3. MudLogging
3.1. Main Mud Logging Aspects
The mudlogging supervision was performed by GEOSERVICES from 132 to 4005m MD/RT (Date: from
19 May to 11 June 2007).
A mudlogging audit has been performed at the end of the 17 ½”’ section. It started on, 27 April 2007 and was
completed on 05 May 2007.
The results are summarized in the sections below.
3.2. General Information

3.2.1. Mud Logging Unit Type
The A60 mudlogging unit was operated by 2 crews on shift (2 data engineers and 2 mudloggers) and fitted
with basic equipment.
The unit was located at the shaker-roof at the starboard side of the cantilever deck. An excellent place; close
to the LWD unit (2m), close to the shakers (15m, with one stair) and close to the gastrap (15m).
3.2.2. Database Sampling Rate

The depth database was recorded with a sampling rate of 1m from 132 to 4005m MD/RT. The time data
base was logged with a sampling rate of 4sec during all the well duration.
Database type Sampling Rate m MD/RT m MD/RT

Time 4s 152 4005
Depth 1m 152 4005
3.2.3. Mud Logging Sensors

The table below lists all the recorded parameters, the type of sensors, their location and their accuracy.
Parameter Sensor type Location Accuracy

WOH / WOB tensiometer deadline ± 0.5% of full scale
± 1 cm vertical movement of
Hook Height drawwork
travelling block
RPM Rig Signal top drive
Torque Rig Signal top drive
SPP Pressure stand pipe ± 0.5% of full scale
WHP Pressure choke manifold ± 0.5% of full scale
CUP Pressure Cement unit ± 0.5% of full scale
Calculated from pumps stroke
Flow In 3 pumps ± 1 pulse / minute
counter sensor (proximity sensor)
Flow Out Ultrasonic flow line ± 0.25% of full scale
Mud Density In Differential pressure active ± 0.0005 kg/l
Mud Density Out Differential pressure flow line ± 0.0005 kg/l
Temp In Probe active pit ± 0.1°C
Temp Out Probe flowline ± 0.1°C
Pit levels Ultrasonic pits 1 to 5, trip tank, slug pit ± 0.25% of full scale
drill floor, shaker room,
H2S Analox, semiconductor
pitroom, mudlogging unit
Calcimetry Autocalcimeter Geoservices unit 1%
Ref.: 87607
Version: 1
3.2.4. Gas System Description

Two gas systems were in use: The Reserval as the main system and the Geofid-FGP/FCP as back-up.
RESERVAL
Total Gas and Chromatography
Gas Time for Saturation Max
ID_Number Type Status In/Out Oven Temp Remarks
Equipment Analysis C1 (ppm) C1/C2
100% TG analysis based on peak
RESERVAL 1264028 FID Active OUT 50°C 42s
50% Chrom surface
The analysis on the gas out corresponds to the full cycle C1 to nC5.
The FCP equipment was tested weekly by a gas-injection of a known gas composition.
GEOFID
Total Gas
Type ID_Number Status Accuracy Gas Cal Conc
CH4 at different
GEOFID - FGP 1251127 Active 100ppm
concentrations
The FGP is calibrated during each trip before each drilling phase. The calibration is made using pure CH4
diluted in a close circuit in order to test 3 different concentrations (1, 5 and 10%).
Chromatography
Gas Time for Saturation Max
ID_Number Type Status In/Out Oven Temp Remarks
Equipment Analysis C1 (ppm) C1/C2
analysis based on peak
GEOFID - FCP 1261396 FID Active OUT 65°C 160s 300000
surface
The analysis on the gas out corresponds to the full cycle C1 to nC5.
The FCP equipment was tested weekly by gas-injection of a known gas composition.
Integration module: none
Gas Line
Trap Failure
Type Location Length Blow Back Section Transit Time
Alarm
from gas trap to 120s (injection
Removable about 15m No manual, when necessary 132 to 4005m
GEOSERVICES unit gas trap)
Three gas lines were available. One fore each gas-equipment (Reserval and GEOFID) and one back-up.
Ref.: 87607
Version: 1
Gas Trap
Trap
Type Location Status Volume/Flow Comments
alarm
QGM Flowline Active Non-volumetric No GZ11 for FCP/FGP
Air Flowline Active Non-volumetric No GZG for Reserval
Data Quality Control
17 ½” section:
No drill floor monitor was available for this section due to a damaged cable.
The airconditioner in the main cabin of the mudlgging unit was down from the beginning of the well (21e
of April). A technician was necessary to top up the freon, unfortunately he arrived at 06 th of June.
The quality of the mudlogger’s computer screen was poor, the red colour was gone and the other
colours faint. This monitor was replaced at the 06th of June.
The WOH was accurate at normal drilling levels, however when overpull was experienced the values
were incorrect and the sensor required re-calibration. The RPM also required re-calibration.
The mudlogger computer was down from the beginning of the well. A new one was ordered.
12 1/4’’ section:
The airconditioner in the working area was still down.
The spare mudlogger computer arrived at the 11th of May.
The rig’s RPM signal was still inaccurate. Calibration, after visual counting the string rotation, was often
necessary.
8 ½” section:
Operations went smooth during the 8 ½” section. A part from poor airconditioner system in the working
room, no major or minor problems occurred.
5 7/8” section:
The second airconditioner (equipment-cabin) went also down. A technician arrived at the 06 th of June
and replaced the mudloggers computer screen and the main cabin airconditioner. Also an extended
maintenance was done on the equipment-cabin airconditioner. Both airconditioners were on line on the
07th of June.
Summary:
After the start of drilling, the following parameters (depth, WOB, WOH, torque, RPM, pump flow, active
pit, trip tank and SPP) were cross-checked between the drillfloor and the mudlogging unit on regular
times. Most of the checks were satisfactory. Recalibrations were carried out when necessary.
Gas equipment checks and calibration checks were carried out at a weekly basis, during casing breaks
and when necessary. The results of the tests were all positive, no recalibrations were needed. An
additional quality check was possible to the fact that the FID was running parallel with the reversal. The
readings of both equipments show exactly the same trend; only a small quantitative difference was
noticed.
A regular visit from Geoservices country manager to the rig was done on 30 to 31 May 2007.
Ref.: 87607
Version: 1
3.2.5. Sample Collection
According with the geological interest, the potential drilling hazards and the expected ROP, various
sampling rates were planned. Effective ROP and mud loggers efficiency can temporary affect this
sampling proposal. In that case, labelled empty bags were stored in the sample boxes showing these
technically missing samples. Actual sampling started from 140m.
From To Interval (m) Remarks

140 3080 10 K5-13
3080 4005 5 K5-13
Several sets have been collected:

SET A: wet unwashed sample (+/- 800g) for Total Boussens,
SET B: wet washed sample (+/- 500g) for Total Boussens,
SET C: dried unwashed sample (+/- 100g) for NITG.
K5-13
Set A : Wet/Unwashed Set B : Wet/Washed Set C : Dried/Washed
Box# From To Box# From To Box# From To
1 140 390 1 140 390 1 140 380
2 400 630 2 400 630 2 390 690
3 640 860 3 640 860 3 700 960
4 870 1070 4 870 1070 4 970 1200
5 1080 1290 5 1080 1290 5 1210 1390
6 1300 1530 6 1300 1530 6 1400 1700
7 1540 1810 7 1540 1810 7 1710 1970
8 1820 2110 8 1820 2110 8 1980 2340
9 2120 2320 9 2120 2320 9 2350 2660
10 2330 2600 10 2330 2600 10 2670 2970
11 2610 2870 11 2610 2870 11 2980 3250
12 2880 3120 12 2880 3120 12 3255 3415
13 3130 3320 13 3130 3320 13 3420 3560
14 3325 3455 14 3325 3455 14 3570 3670
15 3460 3605 15 3460 3605 15 3675 3800
16 3610 3705 16 3610 3705 16 3805 3900
17 3710 3830 17 3710 3830 17 3905 4005
18 3835 3955 18 3835 3955
19 3960 4005 19 3960 4005
Ref.: 87607
Version: 1
4. Hydrocarbon Shows
4.1. Shows Description
4.1.1. Gas Shows
K5-13
Mud
Depth Gas TG C1 C2 C3 iC4 nC4 iC5 nC5
Weight Formation
(m MD/RT) Type % ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm
(sg)
tr tr
81 - 710 FG 1.1 Upper North Sea tr tr tr tr tr tr
0.6 5975
710 – 720 FG 1.16 Middle NorthSea 0.37 3518 tr tr tr tr tr tr
720 – 1431 FG 1.16-1.30 Lower NorthSea 0.034 99 tr tr 0 0 0 0
Ommelanden tr tr
1431 - 3141 FG 1.20-1.21 tr tr tr tr tr tr
Chalk 0.036 188
0.008 tr
3141 - 3232 FG 1.21-1.32 Texel chalk tr tr tr tr tr tr
0.0248 82
0.029 11
3232 - 3304 FG 1.32 Holland tr tr tr tr tr tr
0.301 123
0.0182 10 tr tr
3304 - 3482 FG 1.31 Vlieland tr tr tr tr
0.1723 239 107 44
tr tr tr tr
3482 – 3570.5 FG 1.71 Zechstein (undif) tr tr tr tr
0.0609 102 47 24
Zechstein (Basal 0.208 1887 99 53 10 21 10
3570.5 - 3618 FG 1.21 10 33
Carbonates) 3.0267 29606 1127 313 46 141 32
0.0232 100
3618-3883 FG 1.21 Silverpit tr tr tr tr tr tr
0.0804 668
Lower Slochteren 0.045 270 7 tr tr tr
3883-3920 FG 1.21 tr tr
Sandstone 0.1145 991 19 7 9 7
0.135 855 101 45 7 12 7
3920-4005 FG 1.21 Westphalian B 6 29
2.9116 25170 2475 706 61 131 19
4.1.2. Oil Shows
No oil shows were noticed.

Ref.: 87607
Version: 1
5. Mud Analysis
5.1. Mud Historical Summary
K5-13
17 ½ “ section – 132 to 1445m MD/RT
Drilling commenced with 1.10 SG spud mud/SW polymer. The first 50 m were drilled on reduced parameters
to avoid washing out the shoe. At 807 m the mud system was displaced with a 1.16 SG KCL-Polymer-Glydrill
mud system. The mud weight was increased gradually with depth and a final weight of 1.30 SG was
achieved. Drilling stopped at 1445 m section TD.
During the reaming of the 17 ½” section the mud weight was increased to 1.35 SG.
12 1/4” section – 1445 to 3500m MD/RT
The 13 3/8” shoe was drilled out with 1.35 SG KCL-Polymer-Glydrill mud to 1450 m. At this depth a FIT to
1.5 SG EMW was performed. The mud was displaced to 1.20 SG KCL-Polymer mud at 1450 m. Drilling
continued to 3149m. The MW was increased to 1.25 SG at 3149m. During drilling, the MW was increased
stepwise to 1.30 SG down to 3275m, just prior to enter the Vlieland Formation.
8 1/2” section – 3500 to 3586m MD/RT
During drilling out cement and the float collar the 1.35 SG mud was replaced by a 1.70 SG salt saturated
mud system for the drilling of the Zechstein salt interval.
5 7/8” section – 3586 to 4005m MD/RT
After tagging cement at 3528m, the 1.70 SG mud was changed out to 1.20 SG water based polymer mud.
The MW was kept constant around 1.21 SG till TD at 4005m.
Mud type From To Phase MW Formations

Seawater 0 132 17 ½”” 1.05 Upper North Sea Group
Spud Mud 152 807 17 ½” 1.05 – 1.10 Upper-Lower North Sea Group
KCl/ polymer, WBM 807 1445 17 ½ 1.16 – 1.30 Lower North Sea Group
KCl/polymer, WBM 1445 Reaming, after the 9 1.35
Lower North Sea Group
5/8” casing got stuck
KCl/ polymer, WBM 1445 3122 12 ¼” 1.20 – 1.21 Chalk
KCl/ polymer, WBM 3122 3500 12 ¼” 1.32 Rijnland
NaCl saturated, WBM 3500 3586 8 ½” 1.71 Zechstein
Polymer carbonate, WBM 3586 4005 5 7/8” 1.21 Silverpit, Lower Slochteren and Westphalian B
Ref.: 87607
Version: 1
5.2. Mud Analysis
Depth Mud Type Mud weight ECD Viscosity Fitrate Oil/Water Cl- pH Temp Additives
ºC
155 WBM 1.07 4 10 26 spudmud
540 WBM 1.12 29 KCl, Polymer
859 WBM 1.16 10 6 95000 9.0 29 KCl, Polymer
1357 WBM 1.28 1.28 18 5.5 78000 8.5 50 KCl, Polymer
1445 WBM 1.30 17 6.0 100000 9.0 56 KCl, Polymer
1582 WBM 1.20 1.23 20 3.5 48000 9.5 39 KCl, Polymer
1869 WBM 1.20 1.22 15 4.4 44000 9.0 44 KCl, Polymer
1961 WBM 1.20 1.23 16 5.0 40000 9.1 38 KCl, Polymer
2486 WBM 1.20 1.23 17 5.0 40000 9.2 52 KCl, Polymer
2923 WBM 1.20 1.23 26 6.0 38000 9.0 56 KCl, Polymer
3078 WBM 1.21 16 7.0 30000 9.0 54 KCl, Polymer
3149 WBM 1.21 18 7.0 32000 9.0 54 KCl, Polymer
3380 WBM 1.32 1.32 30 3.0 64000 8.5 55 KCl, Polymer
3413 WBM 1.31 1.36 29 3.0 68000 8.5 51 KCl, Polymer
3500 WBM 1.32 25 3.5 77000 8.5 56 KCL, Polymer
3578 WBM 1.71 1.86 37 3.5 186000 8.5 56 NaCl , Saturated
3586 WBM 1.71 37 3.5 185000 7.0 41 NaCl , Saturated
3665 WBM 1.21 15 59000 10.0 44 Polymer
3731 WBM 1.21 19 64000 9.6 46 Polymer
3860 WBM 1.21 21 59000 9.9 53 Polymer
4005 WBM 1.21 20 58000 9.7 53 Polymer
5.3. Mud Sample Expedition
Three mud samples of 1 liter were taken during drilling the 5 7/8” section, just before and after logging.
Box Bottle Depth Date Source Comment

1 4005 03 June 07 flowline 5 7/8” section, transported to Total
1 2 4005 03 June 07 flowline Office, the Haque at 08 June 07.
3 4005 05 June 07 active pit

Ref.: 87607
Version: 1
6. LWD/MWD
6.1. LWD Summary
The LWD acquisition has been carried out by Baker Hughes Inteq. The LWD runs are as per list below.
6.2. List of Recorded Logs

K5-13
Bit Desc Date in Date out Log Suite Depth(MD) Bit Remarks
Nb Top Bot. Size

2 1 04-May-07 07-May-07 NaviTrak gamma 1445 1920 12 ¼” Dir only
3 2 07-May-07 10-May-07 NaviTrak gamma 1920 2935 12 ¼” Dir only
Dir only. String washed out and
4 3 10-May-07 11-May-07 NaviTrak gamma 2935 2980 12 ¼”
parted at 2980m.
5 4 12-May-07 14-May-07 NaviTrak gamma 2980 3086 12 ¼” Dir only. POOH for bit change
6 5 14-May-07 15-May-07 NaviTrak gamma 3086 3149 12 ¼ Dir only to 3149m. Gr from 3100m
NaviTrak gamma Poor ROP, POOH, made up same
7 6 15-05-07 17-5-07 3149 3380 12 ¼
(Dir-Gamma) BHA & bit
NaviTrak gamma
7RR1 7 17-05-07 19-5-07 3380 3500 12 ¼ Reached 12 ¼” section TD
(Dir-Gamma)
NaviTrak gamma
8 8 23-05-07 24-5-07 3500 3586 8½ Reached 8 ½” section TD
(Dir-Gamma)
Ontrak ROP dropping, changed with new
9 9 27-05-07 31-05-07 3586 3731 5 7/8”
(Dir-Gamma-Res) BHA
Ontrak
10 10 31-05-07 03-06-07 3731 4005 5 7/8” Reached 5 7/8” section TD
(Dir-Gamma-Res)
6.3. LWD Evaluation
All ten MWD/LWD runs were performed as per specification. No LWD failure was noticed during drilling this
well.
Maximum circulation temperature at TD (4005m MD) is 87°C (detected by TCDM MWD/RDW tool
temperature).
6.4. LWD/MWD Cost

The LWD cost including MWD directional for this well is 90,442.- Euros, which acquired GR from 3100 and
GR/Resistivity from 3585 to 4005m (TD driller).
Ref.: 87607
Version: 1
7. Wireline Logging
7.1. Wireline Logging Summary
No open hole wireline logs performed down to 7” liner (3581m)
Open Hole Wireline logging 5 7/8” :

Three wireline logging runs were performed as follows:
Run 1.1.1 HRLA-APS- HNGS – PEX
Within the initial logging programme, the HRLA-APS-HNGS-PEX-XPT-DSI tool configuration was supposed to be
performed in one run. Due to a potential risk of not sufficient power to run the whole toolstring, the decision
was made to split the original run 1.1.1 into : run 1.1.1 (HRLA-APS- HNGS – PEX) and run 1.1.2 (XPT-DSI). Both
runs were performed without problems.
Run 1.1.2 XPT-DSI-GR
Thirty attempts to obtain a pressure reading were taken, resulting in 8 successful tests, 20 tight tests and 2
lost seals.
Run 1.1.3 MSCT-GR
Thirty rotary sidewall cores were successfully taken (100% recovery). All the plug samples were sent to Total
Headquarter Laboratory in Pau, France, for further analysis. The results of XRD and PHI-K measurements
are listed in page 35.
Cased Hole Wireline logging 9 5/8’’ x 7’’ casing :

One run was performed inside casing:
Run 1.1.4 CBL/VDL/GR

The tool was RIH to 3393m and logged up. Likely due to the effect of a micro-annulus, the cement was hard
to recognize. Finally the top cement was found at 825m. A more precise examination of the CBL-VDL data
was still ongoing during writing this report.
7.2. List of Wireline Recorded Logs
K5-13
Logged Depth
Run Log Suite Max. Temp º C (MD) Remarks
Top Bot.
1.1.1 HRLA-APS- HNGS - PEX 126.5 3583 4000.5
30 pressure stations. The last pressure
1.1.2 XPT-DSI 126.5 3587 3996
point at 3922m
1.1.3 MSCT 127 3886.5 3924.8 30 cores
1.1.4 CBL-VDL-GR 130 0 3393 Inside casing, GR to surface
7.3. Data Processing and Analysis

No data processing was performed in this well.
Ref.: 87607
Version: 1
7.4. Formation Temperature Evaluation

Results of the temperature extrapolation with Horner plot method are given below. All the temperatures are
derived from the head thermometers of the logging suit.
WELL : K5-13
ABBREVIATION : K5-13
WIRELINE COMPANY : Schlumberger DRILLER DEPTH : 4005m DRILLING PHASE : 5 7/8"

WIRELINE JOB Nº : 1 STOPPED DRILLING AT : 6/3/2007 11:00
STARTED : 4-Jun-07 STOPPED CIRCULATING AT : 6/3/2007 12:40
HRLA/TLD/APS/ DSI/XPT/GR MSCT 130

Tool Type HNGS
Descent nbr 1.1.1 1.1.2 1.1.3

Bottom logger 4000.5 3996.0 3924.8 129
D 6/3/2007 12:40 6/3/2007 12:40 6/3/2007 12:40
tk1 10 10 10
tk2 100 100 100 128
t 6/4/2007 5:10 6/4/2007 17:20 6/5/2007 5:00
∆t = t - D (mn) 990 1720 2420
tk = tk1 + tk2 110 110 110
Temperature ºC
BHT 126.5 126.5 127 127
log ((tk+∆t)/∆t) 0.046 0.027 0.019
126
D = Date of end of circulation (d/h:mn) Linear regression
tk1 = Time to drill the last meter (mn) y=ax+b
tk2 = Last circulation duration (min) a -65.64
t = date tool off bottom (d/h:mn) b 128.27 125
Remarks :
tk=tk1+tk2 is the formation cooling time Line plotting
∆t=t-D is the formation heating time Input Output 124
xmin 0.0 128.3 ymax
Extrap. Temp. xmax 0.3 109.9 ymin

123
128.3 ºC @m: 3996
0.000 0.050 0.100
log ((tk+∆t)/∆t)
7.5. Wireline Logging Cost

The entire K5-13 logging cost is 884,518.00.- Euros including the monthly rental unit.
Ref.: 87607
Version: 1
8. Wireline Formation Testing

8.1. Wireline Formation Testing Summary
XPT’s tool has been used for this operations. Thirty attempts to obtain a pressure reading were taken in
Zechstein carbonate and Lower Slochteren sandstone reservoirs, resulting in 8 successful tests, 20 tight
tests and 2 lost seals.
The cross plot pressure vs.depth shows a water gradient trend. (See § 8.3 and 8.4 for detail)
8.2. Pressure Data

Hydrostatic Formation
Depth Mud Mobility Temp.
No Formation Pressure Pressure EMW Quality Remark
mD/c ºC
M MD M TVDSS Bara emw Bara
Zechstein
1 3587.0 3542.00 427.96 1.21 108.3 Tight
carbonate
Zechstein
2 3591.0 3546.00 427.96 1.21 109.9 Lost Seal
carbonate
Zechstein
3 3616.0 3571.00 428.40 1.21 110.3 Tight
carbonate
Zechstein
4 3618.0 3573.00 428.40 1.21 111.1 Tight
carbonate
5 Silverpit 3838.0 3792.80 431.29 1.21 115.1 Tight
6 Silverpit 3849.5 3804.30 431.54 1.21 120.3 Tight
7 Silverpit 3864.7 3819.50 457.30 1.21 121.4 Tight
8 L.Slochteren 3887.0 3841.80 457.30 1.21 122.4 Tight
11 L.Slochteren 3902.5 3857.29 458.66 1.21 432.22 1.13 0.5 124 Good
12 L.Slochteren 3903.5 3858.29 460.45 1.21 433.25 1.13 3 124.5 Good
13 L.Slochteren 3905.5 3860.29 463.10 1.21 433.43 1.13 5.1 124.7 Good
Zechstein
21 3587.5 3542.50 466.00 1.21 109.5 Tight
carbonate
22 Silverpit 3838.2 3793.00 466.54 1.21 116.5 Tight
23 Silverpit 3849.7 3804.50 466.73 1.21 120.5 Tight
25 L.Slochteren 3890.70 3845.49 464.81 1.21 123.4 Lost Seal
Ref.: 87607
Version: 1
8.3. Water Head X-plot
K5-13 True potential plot

K5-13 (XPT measurements) (Water Density 1.09, Salinity 226000 ppm)
Water Head vs Depth

Pressure in bars
433.0 433.5 434.0 434.5
180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190
3855 3855
3860 3860
DEPTH in m TVDSS
DEPTH in m TVDSS
3865 3865
3870 3870
Water gradient : 1.55 psi/m = 0.11 bars/m

K5-13
Bottom hole density : 1.09 g/cc K5-13
Surface density : 1.13 g/cc (Vol. factor 1.035)
Salinity : 200 g/l = 226000 ppm
Rw : 0.0125 at 124.6 DegC
Ref.: 87607
Version: 1
8.4. Wireline Formation Sampling

No fluid samples were taken.
Ref.: 87607
Version: 1
9. Sidewall Coring
9.1 Sidewall Coring Summary
A MSCT was run and 30 sidewall cores were taken (100% recovery), without any problems.
All 30 SWC plugs were sent to Total HQ Pau laboratory for further analysis.
9.2 Sidewall Core Data

The sidewall cores data including the XRD and PHI-K measurements, Vitrinite and Fluid inclusion
analyses are listed in the following Pages.
Ref.: 87607
Version: 1
Result of XRD and PHI-K measurements
PHIT RHOG KH CEC (mEq/100g)

Well Log Depth Log Depth FORM Origin Albite (Plagio) Quartz Ankerite Siderite Apatite Anhydrite Hematite Barytine Anatase Kaolinite Illite + IS R1 Clays & micas ISS/LAB
corrected
10/31/2007 0.5 m (Na,Ca)(Si,Al)4O8 SiO2 Ca(Mg,Fe)(CO3)2 FeCO3 Ca5(PO4)3(OH,F,Cl) CaSO4,2H2O Fe2O3 BaSO4 TiO2 (CEC 3-10-50) (CEC 10-40) Sum Calculated Measured
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 11
2.62 2.65 3.10 3.88 3.18 3.00 5.20 4.50 3.89 2.59 2.82 0 on powder
(m) (m) V/V g/cc mD (Mass %) (Mass %) (Mass %) (Mass %) (Mass %) (Mass %) (Mass %) (Mass %) (Mass %) (Mass %) (Mass %) (Mass%) 30 150°C
K5-13 3886.50 3886.00 Lower Slochteren RSWC 0.038 2.849 N/A 4.626 12.397 2.391 3.100 0.357 0.000 6.138 0.085 0.984 7.00 62.88 69.88 9.642 10.583
K5-13 3887.00 3886.50 Lower Slochteren RSWC 0.049 2.722 0.042 1.381 66.249 16.181 1.000 0.155 0.000 0.637 0.704 0.266 4.45 8.93 13.38 1.474
K5-13 3890.50 3890.00 Lower Slochteren RSWC 0.034 2.823 0.016 3.670 25.373 3.000 3.000 0.356 0.000 4.968 0.239 0.914 6.82 51.62 58.44 7.948 7.397
K5-13 3904.00 3903.50 Lower Slochteren RSWC 0.089 2.696 0.728 1.322 80.371 0.500 8.000 0.163 0.000 -0.022 0.003 0.265 4.58 4.70 9.28 0.842 0.441
K5-13 3911.50 3911.00 Lower Slochteren RSWC 0.132 2.650 17.178 1.460 89.762 1.852 1.000 0.093 0.000 -0.036 0.446 0.082 2.13 3.15 5.27 0.536
K5-13 3919.00 3918.50 Lower Slochteren RSWC 1.631 60.000 2.000 3.000 0.199 3.500 1.994 0.258 0.472 4.83 22.00 26.83 3.445 2.000
Ref.: 87607
Version: 1
Result of geochemistry measurements on Westphalian B cutting.
MATURITY ASSESSMENT
DEPTH Sampling Reflectance
Stratigraphy
(m TMD) (m TVDSS) Type Rr % Nature SD. NM. Q
Westphalian B 3950.0 3904.8 Cutting 0.92 V 0.05 40 I
RR %: Reflectance Random. Nature: Type of particles (V=Vitrinite, B=Bitumen).

SD: Standard Deviation. NM: Number of Measurements.
Q: Quality code (I=Important, M=Medium, L= Low, NS=Not Significant).
PETROLEUM POTENTIAL
DEPTH TOC S1 S2 PI T HI OI
Geo No. Nature
(m TMD) (m TVDSS) Max
Westphalian B Coal 3950.0 3904.8 66.92 12.98 167.74 0.07 441 251 3
Westphalian B Shale 3985.0 3939.8 2.96 0.37 3.87 0.09 446 131 16
TOC: Total Organic Carbon (Weight % of rock).

S1 Productivity: Kg of hydrocarbons (Free and Thermovaporizable per ton rock Æ Oil.
S2 Potential Productivity: Kg of hydrocarbons (Cracking of Kerogen) per ton of rock -----Æ Kerogen.
PI Production Index: Ratio Productivity / Productivity+ Potential Productivity (S1/S1+S2).
TMax Temperature: Temperature (°C) of the maximium formation of hydrocarbons by cracking of
kerogen (S2).
HI Hydrocarbon Index: Mg of hydrocarbon (coming from cracking of kerogen) per gram of TOC (S2/TOC).
OI Oxigen Index: Mg of carbon dioxide (coming from cracking of kerogen) per gram of TOC
(CO2/TOC).
Ref.: 87607
Version: 1
Fluid inclusion volatile profiles

Ref.: 87607
Version: 1
10. Stratigraphic and Structural Results

10.1. Stratigraphic & structural results summary
K5-13
Stratigraphy Prognosed Depth Actual Depth
Seismic Diff
Age Group Formation/Member/unit MD/RT TVDBRT TVDSS MD/RT TVDBRT TVDSS
Marker
Msl 44.84 44.84 0 44.84 44.84 0
Recent- U. North Sea
81 81 -37.2 81 81.0 -36.20
Tertiary Group
M. North
Teriary 710 710.0 -665.15
Sea Group
Brussels Marl Mb 720 720.0 -675.43
L. North Sea
Tertiary Ieper Clay Mb 750 750.0 -705.45
Group
Landen Mb 1360 1360.0 -1315.45
C2 Ommelanden Chalk Fm 1444 1444 -1400 1431 1431.0 -1386.15 -13.8
Upper chert 1431 1431.0 -1386.15
Upper
Chalk Clean Chalk 1850 1850.0 -1805.13
Cretaceous
Lower Chert 2930 2929.9 -2885.03
D0 Texel Chalk 3184 3184 -3140 3141 3140.9 -3096.02 -44
D1 Holland 3234 3234 -3190 3235 3234.9 -3190.02 0
Lower
Rijnland D2 Vlieland Claystone 3274 3274 -3230 3308 3307.8 -3263.01 33
Cretaceous
Vlieland Sandstone 3466 3465.8 -3421.01
D4 Zechstein Undiff 3464 3464 -3420 3483 3482.8 -3438.00 18
Z2 Basal Anhydrite 3573.2 3573.0 -3528.20
Zechstein F4 Z2 Carbonate 3556 3556 -3512 3577 3576.8 -3532.00 20
Z2 Anhydrite 3594 3593.8 -3549.00
Permian Z1 Carbonate 3611 3610.8 -3565.99
R Silverpit 3598 3598 -3554 3620 3619.8 -3574.99 21
TLS,MFS3 L.Slochteren Sst 3852 3852 -3808 3879.4 3879.04 -3834.20 26.2
U.Rotliegend
MFS2 3901.9 3901.53 3856.69
MFS1 3913.0 3912.63 3867.79
Westphalian
DH Coal Measures 3884 3884 -3840 3925.35 3924.98 -3880.14 40.14
B
TD 3984 3984 -3940 4008* 4007.59 -3962.75 22.75
* Logger Depth
10.2. Marker Charts

Marker Depth (m) Remarks
Name MD/RT TVDBRT TVDSS
Top Chalk C2 1431 1431 -1386.15 From ROP, cuttings
Base Chalk D1 3235 3234.9 -3190.01 From cuttings, LWD GR
Base Cretaceous D4 3483 3482.8 -3438.00 From ROP, cuttings, LWD GR
Top R 3620 3619.8 -3575.00 From cutting, LWD GR
TLS (MFS3) 3879.4 3879.04 -3834.20 From cutting, LWD GR
MFS2 3901.9 3901.53 3856.69 From cutting, LWD GR
MFS1 3913.0 3912.63 3867.79 From cutting, LWD GR
DH 3925.35 3924.98 -3880.14 From cutting, LWD GR
Ref.: 87607
Version: 1
10.3. Lithology
RECENT-TERTIARY (81m – 1431m)

UPPER NORTH SEA GROUP (81 m – 710 m)
Drilling started in the loose Quaternary sands at the seabed.
132– 390 m:
Loose SAND: translucent, fine to medium, sub round to round, moderately to well sorted, abundant
shell fragments, wood inplaces, occasional traces of mica, pyrite and lignite.
390– 450 m:
Sandstone: Loose SAND: translucent, fine to medium, sub round to round, moderately to well sorted,
shell fragments, wood inplaces, occasional traces of mica, pyrite and lignite.
alternating with:
Claystone: medium grey, soft, sticky, slightly calcareous, occasional shell fragments and
lignite,silt/sandy in places.
450 – 710 m:
Claystone: medium grey, soft, sticky, slightly calcareous, occasional shell fragments and
lignite,silt/sandy in places.
MIDDLE NORTH SEA GROUP (710– 720m)
710 – 720 m:
Claystone medium grey, soft to firm, sticky and amourphous in places. Slightly calcareous, shell
fragments and lignite in places, silty/sandy in places.
LOWER NORTH SEA GROUP (720– 1431m)
Dongen Formation (720 – 1360m)

The Dongen Formation can be subdivided into the Brussels Marl and the Ieper Claystone. The
boundaries were picked on cuttings lithology.
Brussels Marl Member (720– 750m)

Claystone: green grey, rare dark brown, light grey in places, soft to firm, calcareous,
micaceous in places, moderately indurated.
Ieper Clay Member (750 – 1360m)

750 – 790 m:
Claystone: green grey, dark brown to light grey in places, soft to firm, calcareous,
micaceous, in places, moderately indurated.
Ref.: 87607
Version: 1
790 – 860 m:
Claystone: grey brown, light to medium grey, soft to firm, silty in places, calcareous,
micaceous and lignitic in places.
860 – 1180 m:
Claystone: Medium grey, green grey, brown grey, sub block to blocky, soft to firm, rarely
amorphous, calcareous, slightly silty, grading to Marl in places, micaceous, pyritic and
glauconitic in places.
1180 – 1360 m:
Claystone: Medium grey, green grey, brown grey, sub block to blocky, soft to firm, rarely
amorphous, calcareous, slightly silty, micaceous, pyritic in places.
Landen Clay Member (1360 – 1431m)
Claystone: red brown, medium grey, green grey, brown grey, sub block to blocky, soft to firm,
rarely amorphous, calcareous, slightly silty, micaceous, pyritic and glauconitic in places.
With thin stringers of:
Dolomite: light brown to light tan, very hard to hard, crystalline.
Tuffite: off white to light grey, speckled, soft crumbly, silty in places.
CRETACEOUS (1431– 3483m)

CHALK GROUP (1431 – 3232m)
The top of the Chalk Group was clearly indicated by a negative drilling break and the appearance of
chalk and chert in the cuttings.
OMMELANDEN FORMATION (1431 – 3141m)
1431 – 1850 m:
Chalk: white, soft-firm, slightly fine glauconitic, fossiliferous (good traces bentic foraminifera and
traces bryozoa), occasionally partly silicified and hard, becoming slighty argillaceous with depth.
30-3% (decreasing with depth) Chert: light grey and translucent, often grey and opaque, very
hard.
1850 – 2918 m:
Chalk: white, soft-firm, becoming hard with depth, very slightly argillaceous, fine glauconitic.
Interbedded with:
Ref.: 87607
Version: 1
thin Claystone streaks: brown grey, very calcareous, glauconitic, sandy.
2918 – 2930 m:
Chalky Limestone: off white to creme, firm to very hard, mudstone to wackestone.
Max. 5% Chert: light grey, translucent, very hard.
2930 – 3141m:
Chalky Limestone: off white to creme, occasionally in places very light pinkish, firm to very hard,
mudstone to wackestone.
5-20% Chert: light grey, occasionally orange-pinkish, translucent, very hard.
TEXEL FORMATION (3141 –3235m)
The top of the Texel Formation was clearly indicated by the appearance of black claystone in
the cuttings and the onset of a GR peak.
Actinocamax Plenus Marl Member (3141 – 3144m)
Claystone: dark grey to black, soft to predominantly firm, bituminous, subfissile, calcareous.
Texel Marl Member (3144 – 3235m)
The top of the member is characterized by the appearance of argillaceous limestone and a
decrease in GR readings.
The member consists of Limestone: off white to creme, firm to hard, slightly argillaceous,
becoming very argillaceous with depth, mudstone to wackestone, grading into calcareous
Claystone: light grey, soft to firm.
RIJNLAND GROUP (3235 – 3483m)
HOLLAND FORMATION (3235 – 3308m)
The boundary between the Texel and the Holland Formation is sharp. The boundary is
characterized by the appearance of brick red Claystone and a distinctive GR increase.
The member consists of Claystone: red brown to brick red, firm, calcareous, in places silty.
Occasionally interbedded with;
Claystone: green grey, firm, calcareous.

Ref.: 87607
Version: 1
VLIELAND CLAYSTONE FORMATION (3308 – 3466m)
The top of the Vlieland Claystone Formation is clearly defined by another increase in GR and
the appearence of dark grey Claystone.
Claystone: predominantly medium to dark grey, occasionaly red brown to brick red, rarely green
grey, soft to firm, sub blocky to blocky, non to calcareous, slightly silty in places, micro pyritic
and glauconitic.
Interbedded with:
Limestone: mudstone, light grey to off white, soft to hard, amorphous, crypto to micro crystalline,
micro laminations.
Dolomite: off white, light tan, angular crystalline.
VLIELAND SANDSTONE FORMATION (3466 – 3483m)
The Vlieland Sandstone Formation is very poorly developed in the K5-13 well. The top is picked
at the onset of a small GR peak. The formation consists of Claystone and Siltstone.
Claystone: as above, becoming more glauconitic.
Alternating with:
Siltstone: light grey to offwhite, argillaceous, glauconitic.
PERMIAN (3483 – 3620m)

“ZECHSTEIN Undifferentiated” (3483 – 3577)
The top of the Zechstein Group was indicated by a sharp decrease in ROP and the appearance of
anhydrite.
It was not possible to differentiate the upper part. This interval consists of Anhydrite/Halite/Polyhalite.
Anhydrite: soft to firm, white to off white, in places becoming crystalline, off white to light grey, and
translucent. In places grading to Halite/Polyhalite.
Z2 Basal Anhydrite Member (3577 – 3583.0)
The top is defined by offset well correlation and characterized by a sharp decrease in the
GR. The member consists of clean Anhydrite: offwhite, soft.
Ref.: 87607
Version: 1
Z2 Carbonate Member (3583 – 3594m)
The top is characterized by the appearance of dolomite and a slight increase in the GR. The
member consists in the upper part of dolomitic Anhydrite and at the lower part of dolomitic
Limestone.
Dolomitic Anhydrite: off white, dark grey to brown grey mottled, firm to hard in places,
argillaceous, black carbonaceous specks.
Z2 Anhydrite Member (3594 – 3611m)
The top is defined by a slight and slow decrease in the GR. The member consists of
Anhydrite: soft, white, calco-dolomitic.
Z1 Carbonate Member (3611 – 3620m)
The top is picked by GR correlation with offset wells and is characterized by a slight
increase. The member consists of dolomitic Limestone, which becomes argillaceous with
depth. The base consists of black Claystone (Coppershale), clearly indicated by a high GR
peak.
dolomitic Limestone: medium grey to light brown grey, soft, argillaceous, black
carbonaceous, micro laminations in places, becoming crystalline in places with depth.
Claystone: black, soft to hard, rich in organic material.
UPPER ROTLIEGEND GROUP (3620 – 3925.35m)
SILVERPIT CLAYSTONE FORMATION (3620 – 3879.4m)
The top of the formation is characterized by the appearance of red brown claystone and picked
at the base of the above mentioned GR spike.
The formation consists of Claystone, occasionally interbededd with Siltstone and Sandstone.
Claystone: red brown, firm, silty, occasionally slightly anhydritic, very slightly calcareous.
Siltstone: red brown, light orange brown mottled, firm, argillaceous, slightly calcareous.
Sandstone: light red brown to light orange brown, very fine to fine, soft crumbly, loose quartz
grains, transparent colourless, moderately well sorted, moderately well rounded, silty. No visible
porosity.
Ref.: 87607
Version: 1
SLOCHTEREN FORMATION (3879.4 – 3925.35m)
The top is defined by a decrease in GR readings and the appearance of sandstone.
Lower Slochteren Sandstone (3879.4 – 3925.25m)
The member consists of sandstone alternating with claystone.
Sandstone: mainly as off white to light grey rockflour, in places light pinkish, very fine to fine,
becoming medium to occasionally coarse at the base, slightly dolomitic, siliceous cemented
alternating with:
Claystone: red brown, soft, sticky, silty, slightly calcareous/dolomitic.
CARBONIFEROUS (3925.35 – 4008m, TD)

WESTPHALIAN B (3925.25 – 4008m)
The top is picked by GR offset well correlation. The upper 12m consists of red brown claystone,
comparable with the Rotliegendes. At 3932m the lithology changed in an alternation of grey
claystone, sandtone and siltstone, occasionally interbedded with coal.
Claystone: light grey, often dark grey and carbonaceous, soft to firm, silty.
alternating with:
Siltstone: light grey, argillaceous, soft to firm, occasionally hard, carbonaceous in places.
grading to:
Sandstone: mainly as light grey to off white rock-flour, very fine to fine, argillaceous, in places
carbonaceous.
Coal: black, hard, brittle.

Ref.: 87607
Version: 1
11. Petrophysical Analysis.

11.1. Petrophysical Analysis
The log interpretation of the lower part of the Zechstein has been performed from 3584 to 3620 m MD,
for the Lower Slochteren reservoir from 3620 to 3925.7 m MD and for the Westphalian reservoir from
3925.7 to 3985 m MD.
11.2. Log Interpretation Parameters

The log interpretation has been performed in house using Geolog6 Multimin module software.
Spectral GR, Sonic, Resistivity, Neutron APS, Density and Sigma curves were used for the
interpretation.
Used data and parameters for the log interpretation:

Used resistivity curves: RLA5 & RXOZ.
Rw = 0.0125 @ 124.6°C (228.000 ppm eq. NaCl).
Rm surface = 0.082 ohmm @ 23°C.
Rmf surface = 0.073 ohmm @ 23°C.
Rmc surface = 0.720 ohm @ 23°C.
Zechstein: m = 2.20, n = 2.00.
Lower Slochteren and Westphalian: m = 2.10, n = 1.70.
Gas density: ±0.2 gr/cc, 0.64 sg.
Bit size = 5 7/8”.
Mud type: WBM, density = 1.21 gr/cc, KCl = 5%.
Temperature = 124.6°C at 4005m.
The interpretation parameter for the Zechstein, Lower Slochteren and Westphalian reservoirs are
presented in the following tables:
Zechstein:
k05013_thur Method Curve Uncertainty Calcite Dolomite Halite Anhydrite Gas FreeW
Formation density RHOZ 0.015 2.71 2.847 2.037 2.977 g/c3
Neutron Schlum APS_APLC APLC 0.014 0 0.025 -0.018 -0.02 v/v
Sonic transit time wyllie linear DT4P 1000 47.79 43.49 67 49.99 175 175 us/ft
Photo-electric factor/absorption PEFZ>>U 0.32 20 9.6 9.63 14.95 b/c3
Total gamma HCGR 6 25 35 5 5 gapi
Spectral thorium HTHO 1 0.5 3 0.2 0.2 ppm
Spectral potassium HFK 0.5 1.5 1.5 0 0 %
Spectral uranium ppm
Unflushed conductivity Dual-water Non-Linear RLA5>>CT 0.06 0 0 0 0 mh/m
Flushed conductivity Dual-water Non-Linear RXOZ>>CXO 0.14 0 0 0 0 mh/m
Thermal neutron decay sigma SIGF 1.1 7.44 6.92 750 16 8.8 100 cu
True formation resistivity
Flushed zone resistivity
Caliper from nuclear/porosity HCAL
Caliper from resistivity/sonic HCAL
Ref.: 87607
Version: 1
Lower Slochteren:
k05013_ls Method Curve Uncertainty Quartz Dolomite Siderite Illite Kaolinite Barite Gas BndW FreeW
Formation density RHOZ 0.015 2.65 3 3.89 2.8 2.59 4.5 g/c3
Neutron Schlumberger APS_APLC APLC 0.014 -0.05 0.025 0.184 0.17 0.34 -0.02 v/v
Sonic transit time wyllie linear DT4P 1000 50.4 43.49 43.8 85.34 85.34 121.9 175 175 175 us/ft
Photo-electric factor/absorption PEFZ>>U 0.32 5.04 9.6 72.2 11.12 5.38 1090 b/c3
Total gamma HSGR 6 1 8 6 200 104 0 gapi
Spectral thorium HTHO 1 0 0 0.4 18 19.3 0 ppm
Spectral potassium HFK 0.5 0 0 0 5 0.08 0 %
Unflushed conductivity Dual-water Non-Linear RLA5>>CT 0.06 0 0 0 0 0 0 mh/m
Flushed conductivity Dual-water Non-Linear RXOZ>>CXO 0.14 0 0 0 0 0 0 mh/m
Thermal neutron decay sigma SIGF 1.1 4.71 22 54.21 40.56 20.12 21 5 50 50 cu
Badhole sections are determined using mainly the caliper HCAL and the density correction HDRA.
A specific Lower Slochteren badhole-model is applied in these sections.
k05013_ls_bh Method Curve Uncertainty Quartz Illite Kaolinite BndW FreeW

Formation density RHOZ 1000 2.64 2.78 2.65 g/c3
Neutron Schlumberger APS_APLC APLC 1000 -0.01 0.247 0.451 v/v
Sonic transit time wyllie linear DT4P 1.951 50.4 85.34 85.34 175 175 us/ft
Photo-electric factor/absorption PEFZ>>U b/c3
Total gamma HSGR 6 1 160 104 gapi
Spectral thorium HTHO 1 0 24 28 ppm
Spectral potassium HFK 0.5 0.25 6.5 1.5 %
Unflushed conductivity Dual-water Non-Linear RLA5>>CT 0.06 0 0 0 mh/m
Flushed conductivity Dual-water Non-Linear RXOZ>>CXO 1000 0 0 0 mh/m
Thermal neutron decay sigma SIGF 1.1 4.71 40.56 20.12 100 100 cu
Westphalian:
k05013_west Method Curve Uncertainty Quartz Dolomite Siderite Illite Kaolinite Gas BndW FreeW
Formation density RHOZ 0.0264 2.65 2.9 3.89 2.8 2.59 g/c3
Neutron Schlumberger APS_APLC APLC 0.014 -0.05 0.025 0.184 0.17 0.34 v/v
Sonic transit time wyllie linear DT4P 10 50.4 43.49 43.8 85.34 85.34 189 189 189 us/ft
Photo-electric factor/absorption PEFZ>>U 0.32 5.04 9.6 72.2 11.12 5.38 b/c3
Total gamma HSGR 6 1 8 6 200 104 gapi
Spectral thorium HTHO 0.5 0 0 0.4 18 19.3 ppm
Spectral potassium HFK 0.2 0 0 0 5 0.08 %
Unflushed conductivity Dual-water Non-Linear RLA5>>CT 0.06 0 0 0 0 0 mh/m
Flushed conductivity Dual-water Non-Linear RXOZ>>CXO 0.2 0 0 0 0 0 mh/m
Thermal neutron decay sigma SIGF 1.1 4.71 22 54.21 40.56 20.12 5 50 50 cu
Ref.: 87607
Version: 1
A specific model is designed for coal intervals:
k05013_coal Method Curve Uncertainty Illite Spec Min 1 BndW FreeW

Formation density RHOZ 0.015 2.7 1.8 g/c3
Neutron Schlumberger APS_APLC APLC 0.014 0.3 0.5 v/v
Sonic transit time DT4P us/ft
Photo-electric factor/absorption PEFZ>>U b/c3
Total gamma HSGR 6 200 50 gapi
Spectral thorium HTHO 1 2 5 ppm
Spectral potassium HFK 0.5 0.25 0.2 %
Unflushed conductivity Dual-water Non-Linear RLA5>>CT 0.06 0 0 mh/m
Flushed conductivity Dual-water Non-Linear RXOZ>>CXO 0.14 0 0 mh/m
Thermal neutron decay sigma SIGF 50 0 100 100 cu
11.3. Reservoir Chart

Averages and sums for Lower Slochteren and Westphalian.
Cut-off Phie > 6% and cut-off Vcl < 40%.
Averages and sums, cut-off Phie>6% and Vcl<40%.

MD Top Bottom Gross Net Net/Gross Φe Swe Vcl Net x Φe Net x Φe x Sg
Hydrocarbons
Porous height
height
09.01.2008 m MD m MD m m % % % m m
level 3620.0 3654.5 34.5 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00
R_MFS10 3654.5 3685.5 31.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00
R_MFS9 3685.5 3716.4 30.9 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00
R_MFS8 3716.4 3762.8 46.4 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00
R_MFS7 3762.8 3786.2 23.4 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00
R_MFS6 3786.2 3824.5 38.3 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00
R_MFS5 3824.5 3852.7 28.2 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00
R_MFS4 3852.7 3879.4 26.7 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00
R_MFS3 3879.4 3901.0 21.6 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00
R_MFS2 3901.0 3913.3 12.3 7.9 0.64 10.6 74.6 14.5 0.84 0.21
R_MFS1 3913.3 3925.4 12.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00
Westphalian 3925.4 4000.0 74.7 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 380.0 7.9 0.02 0.84 0.21
Ref.: 87607
Version: 1
12. Drill Stem Testing

No DST was performed in this well

NLOG GS PUB 9970 EDMP-87607-V1-K5-13 Final End Well Report

Hochgeladen von

Dokumentinformationen

Copyright

Verfügbare Formate

Dieses Dokument teilen

Dokument teilen oder einbetten

Freigabeoptionen

Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

NLOG GS PUB 9970 EDMP-87607-V1-K5-13 Final End Well Report

Hochgeladen von

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

Ref.

ENERGIE BEHEER NEDERLAND B.V. Mr. J. Dirk Bokhoven PDF

Total E&P Paris

Total E&P Pau

Total E&P Nederland

7. WIRELINE LOGGING ..................................................................................................................................28

Enclosure-1 : K5-13, Location Map

1.1.1. History and Available Data

Production Licence K5b

1.1.2. Well Objectives

1.1.3. Well Duration & Operations

1.1.4. Main Results :

1.2. General Well Data

K5b License location Fig. 1

Legend K4/K5 Unit

Fig.1 Location Map

1.2.4. Well Head Location

1.2.5. Depth Data

1.2.7. Target Data

Stage/Formation: Permian / Lower Slochteren Sandstone.

The reservoir consists of eolian and fluvial sandstones of Permian age.

Lower Slochteren Sandstone.

Depth MD: 3879.4m MD Depth TVDSS: -3834.2 m Fluid: WATER

Target Latitude: 53 °49' 10.400" N Target Northing: 5964482.0 mN

Angle at TD: 2.11 ° Azimuth at TD: 214.19°

1.2.12. WellSite Geologists

2.1.2. Drilling Phase Description

Hole TD Driller Hole TD Hanger Driller

30” Conductor Pipe

Drilling Phase 17 1/2” and 13 3/8” casing (14 days)

Drilling Phase 12 1/4” and 9 5/8” casing (18 days)

Drilling Phase 8 1/2” (5 days)

Drilling Phase 5 7/8” (7 days)

- run# 1.1.1 HRLA-APS-HNGS-PEX

Cement plug-1 3870 – 3645 m (1.93 SG, G-cement slurry)

See enclosure 6 for detail.

The Ensco-72 finally was released on Saturday, 16 June 2007.

2.2. Rig Time Analysis

PT/NPT distribution for K5-13

The detailed NPT’s is as follows:

Run 13 3/8” casing : 126.4 hrs (8.50%)

Wait on Weather : 45.6 hrs (3%)

2.3. Deviation Data

Log depth Origin : RT Driller Depth Origin : RT

Total Measured depth : 4005m MD/RT

Section Top depth Bottom depth Tool

8 ½” 3500 3586 Navigamma

Gyro 1300.00 0.240 219.910 1299.990 -1255.15 -3.817 1.055

17 ½” section - 132 to 1445 m MD/RT

12 1/4" section – 1445 m to 3500 m MD/RT

The Gamma sensor was activated at 3100m.

8 1/2" section – 3500 m to 3586 m MD/RT

5 7/8" section – 3586 m to 4005 m MD/RT

2.4. Drilling Pressure Test

The results are summarized in the sections below.

3.2. General Information

3.2.2. Database Sampling Rate

Database type Sampling Rate m MD/RT m MD/RT

3.2.3. Mud Logging Sensors

Parameter Sensor type Location Accuracy

3.2.4. Gas System Description

Integration module: none

Data Quality Control

The spare mudlogger computer arrived at the 11th of May.