Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
The Supervision Style Guide differs from the CFPB’s Style Guide in some respects. In these
cases, the CFPB Supervision Style Guide prevails. When faced with a style question, first
consult the Supervision Style Guide. If the answer is not here, check the CFPB’s Style Guide.
a CD (a “c”)
a POS terminal (a “p”)
a $5.00 bill (a “five")
abbreviations Spell out full name with the abbreviation in parentheses; do not use quotes
around the abbreviation in parentheses. May use the abbreviation in
subsequent references.
Use abbreviations for proper names only if the reference is clear. In addition,
consider using abbreviations instead of acronyms in documents referencing
entities with similar names. Compare the acronyms and abbreviations for
American Express Bank, FSB and American Express Centurion Bank in the
following:
The CFPB coordinated supervisory reviews of AEFSB and AECB with
prudential regulators.
to the preferred
acronyms Spell out full name with the acronym in parentheses; do not use quotes around
the acronym in parentheses. May use the acronym in subsequent references in
upper-case with no periods.
Today the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) announced that
it is proposing to amend Regulation X, which implements the Real Estate
Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA).
If the acronym is being used as a noun, precede the acronym with the.
to the preferred
administration Lowercase.
Carter administration
Plural is appendices.
automatic teller May use acronym initially without the full term because of the acronym’s
machine (ATM) common usage.
attorney(s) Use lowercase when referring generically to state attorneys general. Capitalize
general when referring to a specific state attorney general.
North Carolina Attorney General Roy Cooper made a statement.
Add “s” to attorney when talking about more than one attorney general.
The attorneys general of Maryland and Virginia filed suit against the Bank.
B
bank, May use the term banks informally when referring to all depository
banks institutions, credit unions, and their affiliates.
billion Use the dollar sign, a number, and the word billion. Use no more than one
digit after the decimal point.
The Bank had $20.3 billion in assets as of December 31, 2011.
board of Use lowercase. Capitalize when used as a proper noun (i.e., preceded by
directors proper name).
(board) The board of directors acknowledged the examination rating.
C
canceled, Use one “l.”
canceling
chief compliance Capitalize only when used as a formal title or when prefaced with a proper
officer name.
Chief Compliance Officer John Smith met with examiners to discuss the
entity’s policies and procedures.
West Bank’s Chief Compliance Officer ensures that all staff have training
in the Federal consumer financial laws pertinent to their jobs.
civil money Spell out full term with acronym in parentheses; may use acronym in
penalties (CMPs) subsequent references. Do not use periods with acronym.
compliance Use lower case except for the acronym and a proper name. Spell out
management full term with acronym in parentheses; may use acronym in subsequent
system (CMS) references.
Examiners reviewed the compliance management system (CMS) at
the entity during the last examination. They found the CMS
adequate for the entity’s operations.
Consumer Spell out full name of agency with acronym in parentheses; may use acronym
Financial in subsequent references. Do not use Bureau.
Protection
Bureau (CFPB) When used as a noun, precede CFPB with the word the.
The CFPB issued its first enforcement action against the Bank.
consumer Do not use this term when referring to laws under the CFPB’s jurisdiction.
financial Instead, use Federal consumer financial laws. See Federal consumer financial
protection laws laws.
consumer Do not use acronym CRA to refer to consumer reporting agency. Always use
reporting agency the full term consumer reporting agency. The acronym CRA commonly refers
to the Community Reinvestment Act.
The three large consumer reporting agencies that most consumers are
familiar with are: Experian, Equifax, and TransUnion.
corporation Capitalize corporation when part of a proper name. May abbreviate and use
Corp. when the term comes at the end of a proper noun. Always spell out
corporation when it occurs elsewhere in the name.
Dell USA Corp.
Corporation for Public Broadcasting
credit card bill, May use either credit card statement or credit card bill. Whichever term is
credit card used, use it consistently within a document.
statement
D
data Data is a plural noun; always use a plural verb.
Personal financial data are treated confidentially by the human
resources department.
Dodd-Frank Wall In formal documents, spell the full name of the statute with acronym in
Street Reform parentheses; may use the acronym in subsequent references.
denial Use denial when referring to loan applications that are denied by an entity.
Do not use declination.
For home improvement applications received in 2012, the entity’s
denial rate was 32 percent for African Americans and 10 percent for
Asians.
different from, Use different from when followed by a noun and describing items that are
different than, unlike.
differ with The CFPB’s focus on practices that pose risks to consumers is different
from prudential regulators’ focus on practices that pose risks to a
bank.
If a clause, having a subject and verb, follows different, then use than.
The CFPB way is different than I expected.
E
e-banking Use lowercase and hyphen.
e.g., Abbreviation for the Latin words for for example. Always use with periods
and followed by a comma. Do not italicize. Do not confuse with i.e. which
is the Latin abbreviation for that is; also means in other words. Compare:
to
elderly When discussing age discrimination under the Equal Credit Opportunity Act,
use elderly to refer to consumers who are age 62 or older.
If phrase or list starts with for example or including, do not use etc. at end of
it.
examiner Lowercase.
examiner-in- Use hyphens with the full term. Spell out full term with acronym in
charge (EIC) parentheses; may use acronym in subsequent references. Do not use periods
with acronym.
F
Fair Housing Act Use FHAct for the acronym. Do not use acronym FHA for the Fair Housing
Act because the acronym FHA more commonly refers to the Federal Housing
Administration.
federal banking Use this term when collectively referring to the FDIC, the Federal Reserve,
agencies and the OCC.
Federal Use this term when referring to specific laws enumerated in Section
consumer 1002(12) of the Dodd-Frank Act. These are the laws the CFPB has authority
financial laws to enforce. Before using the term, confirm that the statutory definition covers
the context in which the term is being used.
Do not add and regulations after the term since regulations are included in
the Dodd-Frank definition of Federal consumer financial laws.
federal financial Use this term when referencing other (i.e., non-CFPB agencies) supervisory
institution agencies collectively. However, do not use it when referring collectively to
regulatory agencies when also including the CFPB. See Federal financial supervisory
agencies agencies.
federal Use lowercase for federal government. Use capital letters and periods for
government, U.S. government.
U.S. government
Federal Register Use italics for Federal Register. Use Fed. Reg. for abbreviation.
(Fed. Reg.)
fewer, Use fewer for things that are countable; use less for things that are not
less countable. HINT: If the noun can be preceded by a number (one branch, 19
violations), modify the noun with fewer, as shown by the following examples.
The violations found at the current examination were less serious and did
not require the attention of the board of directors.
However, less than is used in front of a plural noun that denotes a measure of
distance, time, or amount.
fiscal year(s) When referring to a specific fiscal year, use FY immediately before the year,
without a space. Use all four digits of the year. The fiscal year is designated
by the year in which the fiscal year ends; for example, fiscal year 2013
begins on October 1, 2012 and ends on September 30, 2013.
The CFPB planned a target examination at Bank of the Pacific in
FY2012.
fixed rate, Use two words and no hyphen when used as a noun.
fixed-rate The homeowner mistakenly thought his mortgage had a fixed rate.
follow up, Use two words and no hyphen when used as a verb.
follow-up The examiner will follow up on the corrective actions taken at the next
examination.
government Spell out full term with acronym in parentheses; may use the acronym in
sponsored subsequent references.
enterprise (GSE)
H
Headquarters Capitalize when designating the CFPB’s head office in Washington, D.C.
Hispanic When discussing national origin discrimination under the Equal Credit
Opportunity Act, use either Hispanic or Latino.
Use upper case for Hispanic. Also, for non-Hispanic White, use upper
case for Hispanic and White but lower case for (and a hyphen after) non.
I
i.e., Abbreviation for the Latin words for that is. Also means in other words.
Always use with periods and followed by a comma. Do not italicize. Do
not confuse with e.g., which is the Latin abbreviation for for example.
Compare:
to
its, Its is possessive; do not use an apostrophe. It’s means it is. In formal
it’s documents, use it is; do not use the contraction it’s.
It is unlikely that the Bank will agree to the formal enforcement action
currently being proposed by its supervisor.
K
L
Latino When discussing national origin discrimination under the Equal Credit
Opportunity Act, use either Hispanic or Latino.
less, Use fewer for things that are countable; use less for things that are not
fewer countable. HINT: If the noun can be preceded by a number (one branch,
19 violations), modify the noun with fewer.
The Bank originated fewer loans in 2012 in the state than it did in
2011.
logos for credit card When referring to the logo on a credit card (i.e., Visa, MasterCard,
brand networks Discover, or American Express), call it a network-branded card. Use
the full term throughout for clarity.
While private label gift cards are accepted by only a few merchants,
long term, Use two words and no hyphen when used as a noun.
long-term We will win in the long term.
low- and moderate- Use hyphen after both low and moderate, with a space after low-.
income housing
M
majority Use when meaning more than half the amount.
The majority of state governors (i.e., 26 of the 50 governors)
attended the national meeting.
Matter Requiring Capitalize and spell out full term with acronym in parentheses on first
Attention (MRA) reference; may use acronym in subsequent references. Always
capitalize the acronym. Plural is Matters Requiring Attention or MRAs.
Memorandum of Spell out full term with acronym in parentheses; may use acronym in
Understanding subsequent references. Plural is memoranda of understanding or
(MOU) MOUs. Always capitalize the acronym.
metropolitan Spell out full term with acronym in parentheses; may use acronym in
statistical area subsequent references.
(MSA)
millions Use the dollar sign, a number, and the word million. Use no more than
one digit after the decimal point. Do not use the Roman number MM to
denote one million.
The company had a loss of $10.2 million in net income last year.
multifamily No hyphen.
N
nationwide One word.
One word.
Do not use only nonbank. Always use the term nonbank entity or, after
the first usage of nonbank entity, may simply use entity. Synonymous
with nondepository institution.
O
off-site Use hyphen.
open- and closed-end Use hyphen after both open and closed, with a space after open-.
opt out, Use opt out (written without a dash) as a verb. Use opt-out is an
opt-out adjective. Use opt in and opt-in similarly.
The consumer opted out of the Bank’s overdraft protection
opt in, program.
opt-in
The Bank failed to provide opt-out notices to consumers.
P
part Capitalize when referring to a regulation.
The CFPB regulations can be found in Title 12 CFR Parts 1000-
1099.
percent One word. Do not use “%” in narratives. Use numbers in advance of
point-of-sale (POS) Spell out full term with acronym in parentheses; may use acronym in
subsequent references.
See African American for the preferred style when using the term as a
noun or adjective.
S
Section Capitalize when referring to a specific section of the Dodd-Frank Act or
other laws.
The CFPB’s authority for prohibiting unfair, deceptive, or abusive
acts or practices can be found under Section 1031 and Section 1036
of the Dodd-Frank Act.
Refers to a provider that may or may not be affiliated with the person to
which it provides services.
Supervisory Letter When referencing a specific supervisory letter, spell out Supervisory
(Letter) Letter on first usage with Letter in parentheses; may use Letter in
subsequent references. Capitalize Supervisory Letter or Letter when
referencing a specific supervisory letter.
third party, Use two words and no hyphen when used as a noun.
third-party The Bank services its loans through a third party.
thousands For dollar values in the thousands, use numbers. Do not use the Roman
number M to denote one thousand.
$200,000
U
underrepresented One word.
unfair or deceptive Use when referencing Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act.
acts or practices Spell out full term with acronym in parentheses; may use acronym in
(UDAPs) subsequent references.
Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act prohibits unfair or
deceptive acts or practices (UDAPs).
NOTE: The CFPB does not enforce Section 5 of the FTC Act; the
prudential regulators do.
unfair, deceptive, or Use when referring to the CFPB’s rulemaking, supervision, and
abusive acts or enforcement authority under Sections 1031 and 1036 of the Dodd-Frank
V
variable rate, Use two words and no hyphen when used as a noun.
variable-rate The homeowner mistakenly thought his mortgage had a variable rate.
W
web Use lower case for the following:
web, web page, website, webcam, webcast, and webmaster.
Do not include www. in front of the domain name. All websites should
be hyperlinked, if possible.
which, that Use that in a restrictive clause, which is essential to the meaning of the
sentence. Do not use commas to set off the clause.
The Bank’s policy that loan application records be retained for 24
months did not comply with Regulation B’s record retention
requirement of 25 months (12 CFR 1002.12(b)(3)).
Because joint possessors are considered a unit, use only one apostrophe and s
after the second possessor:
A father and son’s account
to the preferred
to the preferred
For lists that do not comprise complete thoughts or sentences, capitalize the
first letter in the line item and do not put periods at the end.
In order to protect consumers, the CFPB’s actions include:
• Conducting rule-making, supervision, and enforcement for Federal
consumer financial laws;
• Restricting unfair, deceptive, or abusive acts or practices;
• Taking consumer complaints; and
• Promoting financial education.
For lists that do consist of complete thoughts or sentences, capitalize the first
letter in the line item and end the line item with a period.
Consumers should always remember to:
• Read their statements every month.
• Check their balances before making ATM withdrawals.
• Look for ATMs within their bank’s network to avoid surcharges.
commas In a list of three or more items, use a serial comma immediately before a
Use a comma before and after the year when the month and day precede the
year.
The examiners completed the May 31, 2010, supervisory letter that
concluded the Bank’s compliance management system needed to be
strengthened.
commas v. Follow these general rules for commas v. semicolon v. period separation.
semicolon v.
period Use commas to separate bullet points when there is an introductory statement
separation but no internal punctuation within each item listed. For example:
While on an examination, we are careful to check for the following issues:
• Miscalculated APRs,
• Misstated introductory rates, and
• Hidden fees that were not disclosed to the borrower.
Use semicolons to separate bullet points when the items listed contain internal
punctuation. For example:
The Bank had operations in the following U.S. cities and foreign countries:
• New York City, San Francisco, and Chicago; and
• Mexico, Canada, and United Kingdom.
Use a period after each bullet point when items listed are sentences.
Below is a list of recommended ways to improve your grade.
• Study at least 3 hours per day.
• Reach out to teachers when you do not understand a lesson.
• Do not stay out late the night before exams.
The Bank’s president did not attend the final meeting with examiners.
dash Use dash from keyboard, with a space before and after the dash ( - ).
2010 - 2012; Pages 1003 - 1033; June - December
In informal documents, may use the full numerical format with four digits for
the year.
Please forward comments on the draft Examination Report by 3/17/2013.
When a full date (month, day, and year) appears before the end of a sentence,
include a comma after the year, as shown below (i.e., the comma after
November 24, 2011 and after July 4, 2014).
The on-site examination began November 24, 2011, and ended January 13,
2012.
The review period was from July 4, 2014, to August 20, 2014.
The close-out meeting with the board of directors will be held at 10:00
a.m. on June 25, 2012, in Washington, D.C.
Use $ sign and figures in all except casual references or amounts without a
figure.
The book cost $4.
Please give me a dollar.
Dollars are flowing overseas.
For amounts of more than $1 million, use one digit after the decimal place. Do
not link the numerals and the word by hyphen.
He is worth $4.3 million.
He is worth exactly $4,351,242.
He proposed a $300 billion budget.
hyphen A hyphen clarifies the relationship between words that are combined to modify
a noun. The hyphen shows that the words do not modify the noun separately.
Compare:
Old-furniture salesman refers a salesman of old furniture.
to
Typically, hyphenate compound modifiers when they come before a noun and
do not hyphenate them when they come after a noun.
The second-rate opera company gave a performance that was first rate.
Compare:
fifty-yard-wide field
fire-resistant curtains
to
italics Use italics to highlight the names of books, newspapers, journals and
pamphlets. Place in quotation marks the titles of booklets, articles, and other
publications that are part of an italicized work.
Use italics to emphasize words or phrases. In most texts, bold is too much
emphasis.
Italicize words or phrases when discussing what they mean or how they
function.
numerals Use numerical digits for 10 and above and spell out whole numbers below 10.
However, when a number less than 10 appears before percent, use the
numerical digit except for zero percent.
The Bank has five branches (17 percent of total branches) in low- to
moderate-income areas, 25 (83 percent) in middle-income areas, and none
(zero percent) in upper-income areas.
For ordinal numbers, spell out first through ninth and use figures for 10th and
above.
The examination was the first one conducted by the CFPB.
The Bank is the 12th largest in the United States based on asset size.
Spell out the fractions less than one, using a hyphen between the words (e.g.,
two-thirds, four-fifths, one-half). When using decimals for amounts less than
one, use the numeral zero before the decimal point (e.g., 0.03).
Use figures for precise amounts larger than one, converting fractions to
decimals whenever practical (e.g., use 1.5 instead of 1½ or 2.75 instead of
2¾).
page numbers Paginate all documents. Use the pagination embedded in SES templates. For
other documents, center the number at the bottom of the page, in the same font
as the rest of the document. Generally begin pagination on page 2 of a
document.
periods May use either one space or two spaces after a period or any other punctuation
that concludes a sentence. Whichever is used, use it consistently within a
document.
quotation Place end quotation marks outside of commas and periods, and inside
marks semicolons, exclamation marks, and question marks (except when exclamation
marks or questions marks are part of the quotation).
The Bank asked the committee to act “with discretion”; the Bank agreed
not to act until an updated contract was signed.
spacing May use single or double spacing after a period. Whichever is used, use it
consistently within a document.
to the preferred
HINT #1: If you are unclear whether a sentence is in the passive voice, a
general rule of thumb is to add by John Smith right after the verb. If the
sentence makes sense with by John Smith added, then the sentence is in the
passive voice. For example, if the sentence above only said All sentences
are reviewed monthly, you could add by John Smith, and the sentence
would make sense; thus it is in the passive voice:
The policy was drafted in July 2011 [by John Smith].
Compare the above sentence in the passive voice to the following sentence
in the preferred active voice:
John Smith drafted the policy in July 2011.
HINT #2: In Word, turn on the proofing option to check for Grammar and
Style.
comparative file review Use the term comparative file review when referencing an
analysis as described in the Interagency Fair Lending
Examination Procedures.
matched pair Do not use this term when referencing an analysis as described in the
Interagency Fair Lending Examination Procedures. Use
comparative file review. See entry for comparative file review.
to the preferred:
resubmit Use these terms when discussing a supervised entity’s need to resubmit
resubmission its HMDA LAR data. Do not use refile.
unfair, deceptive, or When writing an examination report or supervisory letter, do not say
abusive acts or practices that the entity is “in compliance with UDAAPs.” Instead write that,
(UDAAPs) “As a result of their review, the examiners did not identify any
UDAAPs” or the entity “avoided UDAAPs.” For example:
After a thorough review, examiners did not identify any unfair,
deceptive, or abusive acts or practices.
Guidance of other agencies. The CFPB generally does not consider guidance or similar
documents issued by other agencies in connection with laws that transferred to the CFPB to be
within its enforcement authority. However, for laws for which rulemaking authority transferred
to the CFPB, the CFPB will apply any official commentary, guidance, or policy statements that
were issued prior to July 21, 2011 by a transferor agency that had exclusive rulemaking authority
for the law in question, pending any future CFPB action. This would also apply to similar
documents that were jointly agreed to by all relevant agencies in the case of shared rulemaking
authority. (See 76 Federal Register 43569). For example, the CFPB would not apply to its
supervised agencies the Interagency Guidance on Overdraft Protection Program (70 Fed. Reg.
9127; February 24, 2005) since the agencies involved did not have shared rulemaking authority
for the laws governing overdrafts. In contrast, the CFPB would apply the commentary to
Regulation DD, the implementing rule for the Truth in Savings Act (TISA); the commentary was
written by the Federal Reserve Board and the Board had exclusive TISA rulemaking authority
which transferred to the CFPB.
Proposed regulations. Examiners should only cite violations of final regulations. However,
when reviewing a compliance management system, examiners may make general references to
the importance of monitoring future rulemaking so that management is aware of rulemakings
that could affect its business practices.
Referencing statutes and regulations. When discussing regulations, the initial reference should
include the name of the statute in order to inform the reader of the regulation’s subject. The
statute only has to be referenced once when introducing the implementing regulation. Compare:
The examiners reviewed the Bank for compliance with Regulation Z (12 CFR Part 1026).
to the preferred:
The examiners reviewed the Bank’s mortgage operations for compliance with the Truth
in Lending Act (TILA) and its implementing Regulation Z (12 CFR Part 1026).
For subsequent references to sections of the regulations, use the CFR reference. Do not use the
word Section before the number unless the sentence begins with the CFR citation.
Section 1022.72 of Regulation V contains the general requirements for risk-based pricing
notices.
If the statutory requirements are not implemented by a regulation, cite the US Code for the
statute. Do not cite the section of the statute.
Compare:
The debt collector violated Section 807 of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act
(FDCPA) that prohibits the use of false, deceptive, or misleading representations in
connection with the collection of any debt.
to the preferred:
The debt collector violated the provisions of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act
(FDCPA) that prohibit the use of false, deceptive, or misleading representations in
connection with the collection of any debt (15 USC 1692e).
If the statutory requirements are implemented by a regulation, do not cite the US Code. Only
cite the regulatory requirement. Compare:
The Bank violated ECOA’s requirements for record maintenance (15 USC 1691b(h)) and
the implementing Regulation B’s record retention requirements (12 CFR 1002.12(b)).
to the preferred:
The Bank violated ECOA’s implementing Regulation B requirements for record retention
(12 CFR 1002.12(b)).
Use Part only when referring to the entire regulation. Do not use Part when referring to sections
of a regulation.
The Equal Credit Opportunity Act is implemented by the CFPB’s Regulation B (12 CFR
Part 1002).
In examination reports and supervisory letters, use the name of the statute and, depending on
situation, the pertinent regulation in parentheses.
Truth in Lending Act (Regulation Z) or
Truth in Lending Act and its implementing Regulation Z
Commentary. When referencing the commentary of a regulation, use the following format the
first time a specific regulation’s commentary is referenced:
After the first full reference to the regulation and commentary, for subsequent references
to different commentary of the same regulation, use only:
Comment 9(a)(5)-1.
• 12 USC 5514. This USC cite refers to Defining Larger Participants Of Certain
Section 1024 (Supervision of Nondepository Consumer Financial Product And Service
Covered Persons) of the Dodd-Frank Act. Markets
• 12 CFR Part 1090
• Atlanta • Milwaukee
• Baltimore • Minneapolis
• Boston • New Orleans
• Chicago • New York
• Cincinnati • Oklahoma City
• Cleveland • Philadelphia
• Dallas • Phoenix
• Denver • Pittsburgh
• Detroit • St. Louis
• Honolulu • Salt Lake City
• Houston • San Antonio
• Indianapolis • San Diego
• Las Vegas • San Francisco
• Los Angeles • Seattle
• Miami
References to all other U.S. cities require the city and state.
Federal banking agencies: Use this term when collectively referring to the FDIC, the Federal
Reserve, and the OCC. However, do not use it when referring collectively to agencies,
including the NCUA and the CFPB.
Federal financial institution regulatory agencies: Use this term when referencing other (i.e., non-
CFPB agencies) supervisory agencies collectively, including the NCUA. However, do
not use it when referring collectively to agencies when also including the CFPB.
Federal financial supervisory agencies: Use this term when referencing the following agencies
collectively:
o Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Federal Reserve or FRB)
Do not use Fed on its own to refer to the Federal Reserve.
When referencing one of the 12 Federal Reserve System banks, initially use
the full name of the specific Reserve Bank, with a shortened name in
parentheses; may use the shortened name in subsequent references.
• Examiners from the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (San
Francisco Reserve Bank) participated in the joint examination with
CFPB examiners.
o Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), if referring to post-July 20, 2011 date
o Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC)
o National Credit Union Administration (NCUA)
o Office of Comptroller of the Currency (OCC)
o Office of the Thrift Supervision (OTS), if referring to pre-July 21, 2011 date.
NOTE: The instructions in this section apply to both examination reports and supervisory
letters; however, the section discusses MRAs in the context of examination reports. Examiners
should adjust the instructions, as appropriate, for supervisory letters (for example, by making the
completion due dates and reporting dates based on the transmittal of a supervisory letter).
1. Information to include:
a. actions necessary to address violations or CMS weaknesses described in the report or
letter, and
b. completion due dates and reporting dates that are specific, realistic, and measured from
the transmittal date of the examination report
Compare:
Improve compliance with the Equal Credit Opportunity Act and its implementing
Regulation B.
to the preferred:
Provide staff training on the Regulation B’s requirements for adverse actions,
including the requirement to provide a reason for denial in written notices.
c. If management completed an MRA taken during the course of the examination, list the
MRA and then indicate that it was completed during the examination.
NOTE: MRAs that were completed during the examination must be entered into SES.
NOTE: The information in the examples is illustrative and may not reflect the information
included in actual MRAs resulting from examination findings.
The examination found matters that require a written response to the CFPB.
Reporting date: 90 calendar days from the transmittal 1 of this Report (and every 90 calendar
days thereafter until the MRA completion date), provide the CFPB progress reports on fulfilling
the following MRAs. Include in the reports details on the steps taken to complete the MRA(s)
and the results of the steps taken.
Area Reviewed: Mortgage Origination – Affiliate Marketing Opt-out Notices
1. Review accounts of customer whose mortgage loans originated in the past 12 months to
determine which customers did not receive affiliate marketing opt-out notices. For
customers who did not receive the opt-out notices, send the opt-out notices.
Completion due date: 90 calendar days from the transmittal of this Report.
2. Review the accounts of customers who did not receive opt-out notices to determine
whether the entity used the eligibility information about the consumer for affiliate
marketing purposes. For any such accounts identified, immediately cease such affiliate
marketing.
Completion due date: 120 calendar days from the transmittal of this Report.
3. Revise policies and procedures to reflect Regulation V’s affiliate marketing requirements.
Completion due date: 90 calendar days from the transmittal of this Report.
1
The Transmittal Date is the date that the CFPB emails the Report to the supervised entity.
When writing MRAs for compliance management systems where there is no related violation of
law:
• Keep MRAs at a high level with a focus on improving a compliance management system.
• Do not direct the entity to do specific things to address weaknesses as it is the board of
directors’ and management’s responsibility to determine the specific steps necessary to
effect change.
NOTE: The examples on this page do not include time frames for completion or reporting.
Compare (underlined text highlights language that may be considered too specific):
Evaluate the staffing needs of the institution’s compliance management department.
Provide the CFPB a written document that details the institution’s staffing plans. Include
the identified needed staffing positions, the required experience, and the staffing
numbers. Provide the proposed job descriptions and time frames for posting and filling
the positions.
to the preferred:
Compare:
Ensure that the board is apprised of matters related to Federal consumer financial laws
and consumer risks through regular and detailed discussions at board and committee
meetings, and inclusion of appropriate materials in board packages.
to the preferred:
Ensure that the board is apprised of Federal consumer financial laws and consumer risks
through regular and detailed discussions at board and committee meetings.
NOTE: The information in the examples is illustrative and may not reflect the information
included in actual MRAs resulting from examination findings.
The examination found matters that require a written response to the CFPB.
Reporting date: 90 calendar days from the transmittal 2 of this Report (and every 90 calendar
days thereafter until the MRA completion date), provide the CFPB progress reports on fulfilling
the following MRAs. Include in the reports details on the steps taken to complete the MRA(s)
and the results of the steps taken.
Area Reviewed: Compliance Management Systems
Board and Management Oversight
1. Evaluate the staffing needs of the institution’s consumer compliance management
department and develop a plan that ensures consumer compliance management positions
are filled with a sufficient number of qualified individuals.
Completion due date: 90 calendar days from transmittal of this Report.
2. Implement the plan that ensures consumer compliance management positions are filled
with a sufficient number of qualified individuals.
Completion due date: One year from transmittal of this Report.
3. Take measures to ensure that the board is apprised of matters related to Federal consumer
financial laws and consumer risks through regular and detailed discussions at board and
committee meetings.
Completion due date: 90 calendar days from transmittal of this Report.
2
The Transmittal Date is the date that the CFPB emails the Report to the supervised entity.
Training
8. Develop an improved consumer compliance training program that is current, complete,
effective, and commensurate with the institution’s size and risk profile. The training
program is expected to be directed to appropriate individuals based on their roles, and
include not only regulatory requirements imposed by Federal consumer financial laws,
but also the institution’s specific consumer compliance-related policies and procedures.
Completion due date: 90 calendar days from transmittal of this Report.
9. Implement the improved consumer compliance training.
Completion due date: One year from transmittal of this Report.
13. Develop an audit schedule and scope that is appropriate for the institution’s size, its
consumer financial product offerings, and the manner of conducting its consumer
financial products business.
Completion due date: 90 calendar days from transmittal of this Report.
14. Ensure that audit coverage extends to all lines of business that offer consumer financial
products and services, including any new consumer financial products or services that the
institution implements.
Completion due date: One year from transmittal of this Report.
16. Implement the revised Service Provider Management Policy to ensure that service
providers operate in compliance with Federal consumer financial laws, and that vendor
management due diligence efforts are effectuated and documented appropriately.
Completion due date: 120 calendar days from transmittal of this Report.
NOTE: The information in the examples is illustrative and may not reflect the information
included in actual MRAs resulting from examination findings.
3
The Transmittal Date is the date that the CFPB emails the Report to the supervised entity.
The HMDA violations identified in the course of the examination, any additional violations that
might be identified, and any additional corrective action will be addressed separately from this
Examination Report.
4
The Transmittal Date is the date that the CFPB emails the Report to the supervised entity.
When examiners find violations of Federal consumer financial laws during an examination or
review, examiners must relay information about the violation in a manner that allows the
supervised entity to understand clearly:
The write-up of a violation should include the following (examples are included in section C and
D):
Conclusion
a. Include a conclusion statement about the violation, including a statutory or regulatory cite
for each violation.
b. Include a phrase summarizing the statutory or regulatory requirements (e.g., use the title
of the subsection of the law, or a variation thereof, as the examples below illustrates).
c. Do not describe violations or requirements of law as “technical.”
d. If a statute’s provisions have been implemented by a regulation, only cite the section of
the regulation that was violated; do not cite the U.S. Code section for a statute (however,
in such cases, include the name of the statute).
The Bank violated the Truth in Savings Act’s periodic statement disclosure requirements
for overdraft services as implemented by Regulation DD (12 CFR 1030.11(a)).
The Bank violated 12 CFR 1005.11’s required procedures for resolving errors in
electronic fund transfers, as required by Regulation E, the implementing regulation for
the Electronic Fund Transfer Act.
b. Describe in greater detail the statutory or regulatory requirements in order that all readers
of the examination report or supervisory letter, including a board of directors who may
HINT: You may copy the statutory or regulatory language. If the legal language is
lengthy, paraphrase the legal requirement.
c. Describe what the supervised entity was doing (or not doing); make a clear connection
that the practice was not adhering to the law.
d. Describe the root cause of the violation, tying it to weaknesses in one of the components
of a compliance management system.
Before beginning to draft findings of unfair, deceptive, or abusive acts or practices (UDAAPs),
examiners should discuss the write-up with their Headquarters Office of Supervision Policy
point-of-contact (Policy POC). Such descriptions of findings will require a different style than
those involving laws and regulations that prescribe specific requirements.
UDAAP write-ups will generally focus on the standards that must be met for a finding of
unfairness, deception, or abusive practices. Examiners should describe the entity’s relevant acts
or practices (or omissions) using the related standard language below. Before a report is issued,
the Legal Division must review the report (the Policy POC will facilitate the Legal Division’s
review).
Unfair
The standard for unfairness is:
1. The act or practice must cause or be likely to cause substantial injury to consumers;
2. Consumers must not be reasonably able to avoid the injury; AND
3. The injury is not outweighed by countervailing benefits to consumers or to competition.
Deceptive
The standard for deception is:
1. There must be a representation, omission, act, or practice that misleads or is likely to
mislead the consumer;
2. The representation, omission, act, or practice must be considered from the perspective of
the reasonable consumer; AND
3. The representation, omission, or practice must be material.
Abusive
Section 1031 of the Dodd-Frank Act gave the CFPB the authority to declare an act or
practice abusive in connection with the provision of a consumer financial product or service
if the act or practice:
1. materially interferes with the ability of a consumer to understand a term or condition of a
consumer financial product or service; or
2. takes unreasonable advantage of:
a. a lack of understanding on the part of the consumer of the material risks, costs, or
conditions of the product or service;
b. the inability of the consumer to protect the interests of the consumer in selecting or
using a consumer financial product or service; or
c. the reasonable reliance by the consumer on a covered person to act in the interests of
the consumer.
Only list UDAAP as an Area Reviewed IF the CFPB’s UDAAP examination procedures were
completed. Do NOT list UDAAP as an Area Reviewed if examiners merely kept a look out for
potential acts or practices that might need a thorough review using the UDAAP examination
procedures.
Do NOT say that examiners reviewed whether an entity was “in compliance” with the unfair,
deceptive, or abusive acts or practices provision of the Dodd-Frank Act. Instead, say that
examiners reviewed whether the entity “engaged in” unfair, deceptive, or abusive acts or
practices.
Example 1
NOTE: The information in the examples is illustrative of describing a violation of law. The
examples may not reflect all the information that would be included when writing up the Area
Reviewed sections. Further, actual reports may have referenced certain terms (such as the
Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act in the example below) earlier in the report; in such cases, the acronym
(e.g., GLBA) may be used in the Area Reviewed section that describes the violation.
Conclusion
The Bank violated 12 CFR 1016.5(a)(1) by failing to deliver annual privacy notices as
required by the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act’s implementing Regulation P (Privacy of
Consumer Financial Information).
In reviewing a sample of 30 privacy notices, examiners found that 10 credit card members
who completed a notice of address change did not receive billing statements and other
communications, including the required privacy notices. The violations resulted from
technical changes made on January 1, 2012, to the entity’s information management
system that generates billing statements and privacy notices. The technical changes failed
to reflect changed addresses. The violations evidence weaknesses in the monitoring of
system changes by failing to evaluate and test technical changes before implementation.
Management agreed with the violations and, during the examination, corrected the Bank’s
practices. Examiners reviewed a listing of affected card members and actual examples of
subsequent mailings of privacy notices and determined that the Bank had implemented
practices to prevent future violations.
NOTE: The information in the examples is illustrative of describing a violation of law. The
examples may not reflect all the information that would be included when writing up the Area
Reviewed sections. Further, actual reports may have referenced certain terms (such as the Real
Estate Settlement Procedures Act in the example below) earlier in the report; in such cases, the
acronym (e.g., RESPA) may be used in the Area Reviewed section that describes the violation.
Conclusion
The Bank has an adequate compliance management system that minimizes the occurrence of
violations of Federal consumer financial laws for mortgage origination activities.
Nevertheless, examiners found violations of the following provisions of the Real Estate
Settlement Procedures Act’s implementing Regulation X:
• 12 CFR 1024.17(g) - requirements for Initial Escrow Account Statements
• 12 CFR 1024.8(b) - requirements for the use of HUD-1 or HUD-1A settlement
statements
Each year the Bank reviews its product offerings, policies, and procedures to assess its ability
to adhere to Federal consumer financial laws. This assessment includes updating policies
and procedures to reflect new regulations, guidance, and interpretations. The Bank also
conducts transaction testing and external reviews to determine the effectiveness of its internal
controls. This testing is comprehensive and generally effective. However, the review of
mortgage lending revealed the following violations:
Section 1024.17(g)(1)(i) of Regulation X requires that after conducting the escrow account
analysis for each escrow account, the servicer submit an initial escrow account statement
to the borrower at settlement or within 45 calendar days of settlement for escrow accounts
that are established as a condition of a loan.
(i) The initial escrow account statement shall:
• include the amount of the borrower's monthly mortgage payment and the
portion of the monthly payment going into the escrow account;
• itemize the estimated taxes, insurance premiums, and other charges that the
servicer reasonably anticipates to be paid from the escrow account during the
escrow account computation year and the anticipated disbursement dates of
those charges;
• indicate the amount that the servicer selects as a cushion; and
• include a trial running balance for the account.
Section 1024.8(b) of Regulation X requires the settlement agent to complete the HUD–1 or
HUD–1A, in accordance with the instructions set forth in Appendix A of Regulation X (12
CFR Part 1024). The loan originator must transmit to the settlement agent all information
necessary to complete the HUD–1 or HUD–1A.
For all 10 residential real estate loans reviewed, examiners found that the Bank failed to
properly disclose the correct amount of reserves in the aggregate adjustment section (line
1000) on the HUD-1 settlement statement. The Bank used one extra month in the calculation
of the amount of taxes for the aggregate adjustment. The cause of the violation was
attributed to an error in the information management system used to generate the HUD-1s.
The violations evidence weaknesses in monitoring systems to ensure compliance with legal
requirements. While the aggregate adjustment was not calculated correctly, it should be
noted that the disclosed initial deposit required of the customer and the amount that was
actually collected from the borrower were correct. Therefore, this error did not have an
adverse impact on borrowers.
NOTE: The information in the examples is illustrative of describing a violation of law. The
examples may not reflect all the information that would be included when writing up the Area
Reviewed sections. Further, actual reports may have referenced certain terms (such as the
Electronic Fund Transfer Act in the example below) earlier in the report; in such cases, the
acronym (e.g., EFTA) may be used in the Area Reviewed section that describes the violation.
Conclusion
The Bank violated the error resolution requirements, covering time limits and investigations,
of the Electronic Fund Transfer Act’s implementing Regulation E (12 CFR 1005.11(c)(2)).
During the examination, a total of 99 disputes were reviewed by examiners. In four of the 99
disputes, examiners found that the Bank provided provisional credit outside of the 10
business day window prescribed by Regulation E. These cases were discussed with
management, who acknowledged that provisional credit had been given outside of the
required time frame.
These violations stem from the fact that the Bank’s current practice is to begin the error
investigation upon receipt of a completed and signed dispute form, instead of beginning the
investigation immediately upon oral communication of an issue from a consumer. Though
the Bank’s written procedures explain that the investigation time frame begins upon oral
notification, in practice, investigations do not begin until written confirmation of the error is
received. In some cases, written receipt of the error may be received several days after oral
Management explained that they are in the process of revamping their Regulation E error
resolution process, which includes the development of a new automated system for the
reporting and tracking of disputes. Management indicated that the new system will allow for
disputes to be immediately documented upon oral notification, which they believe should
eliminate the time delay between oral notification, written confirmation of the error, and the
start of the investigation. Management expects the new system to be up and running within
120 days.
NOTE: The information in the examples is illustrative of describing a violation of law. The
examples may not reflect all the information that would be included when writing up the Area
Reviewed sections. Further, actual reports may have referenced certain terms (such as the
Home Mortgage Disclosure Act in the example below) earlier in the report; in such cases, the
acronym (e.g., HMDA) may be used in the Area Reviewed section that describes the violation.
NOTE: Only one of the following examples would be applicable to a particular report.
Conclusion
Examiners reviewed a sample of the Bank’s Home Mortgage Disclosure Act Loan Application
Register (HMDA LAR) and found no violations of HMDA or Regulation C (12 CFR Part 1003).
Management has adopted policies and procedures to ensure HMDA data integrity.
We verified the Bank’s 2012 HMDA LAR by reviewing the data for 32 randomly selected files.
We identified one record in which the loan purpose was incorrectly coded as home improvement
instead of refinance. We determined that this was an isolated instance in coding the loan in the
Bank’s systems.
We reviewed 79 loan files from the Bank’s 2011 HMDA LAR and identified 32 records
containing one or more errors, a 40.5 percent sample error rate. The data fields containing the
largest number of errors were action date (17) and application date (15). Additional errors were
identified in the loan amount and income fields. While some errors appeared to be isolated,
others, such as those in the application date and action date, were recurring. The errors are
attributed to weaknesses in training staff in Regulation C requirements and to weaknesses in
monitoring and taking corrective actions.
The Bank provided a written response admitting that 20 of the HMDA LAR entries had errors,
but challenging the errors that the examination team identified in the additional 12 entries. We
fully considered the Bank’s responses and concluded that two entries were not errors; however,
the other 10 were errors.
In 17 files, examiners determined that the Bank stated the action date incorrectly on the HMDA
LAR. Based on documents found in the loan files, the action date that was listed on an internal
Withdrawn/Denied form was not the date found on the HMDA LAR. The differences between
the reported and actual dates varied from one day up to up to three months.
In 15 files, examiners determined that the Bank stated the application date incorrectly on the
HMDA LAR. Based on documents found in the loan files, the application date was not the date
found on the HMDA LAR. The differences between the reported and actual action dates varied
from 10 days to up to three months.
In seven files, examiners determined that the loan amount stated on the HMDA LAR was
inaccurate. The differences between the reported and actual loan amounts varied from $500 to
several thousand dollars. Management indicated that the larger variances were due to changes in
the amounts due to collateral values, but the loan documentation did not support these changes.
Despite multiple prior citations of inaccurate HMDA data by its prudential regulator, the Bank
continues to submit inaccurate HMDA data. The Bank has not developed or implemented the
necessary policies and procedures to ensure timely submission of accurate data.
Over the past several years, the Bank has failed to comply with HMDA and Regulation C’s
requirements to compile accurate loan data. Further, the Bank continues to have no formal
policies and procedures, training program, or process for conducting compliance audits of its
HMDA practices, all of which are components of a compliance management system.
The Federal Reserve Bank of New York identified HMDA data integrity failures during its
previous two examinations, citing widespread HMDA violations in the Bank’s 2008, 2009, and
2010 HMDA LARs. The Federal Reserve’s Examination Reports dated May 1, 2009, and June
10, 2011 both included citations and corrective actions related to the Bank’s weak HMDA
compliance. Despite these past findings, errors persist.
In 2011, the Bank’s HMDA submission included 15,588 mortgage applications. Of these
applications, 9,557 were reported as originated; 888 as approved but not accepted; 1,267 as
withdrawn; 2,843 as denied; and 1,033 as closed for incompleteness.
In this current examination, CFPB examiners reviewed a sample of 2011 LAR, including 79 loan
applications: 33 were reported as originated; 20 as withdrawn; six as denied applications; and 20
as closed for incompleteness. Of the 79 loan files sampled, examiners identified at least one
error in each of 36 loan files, resulting in a high error rate of 45.6 percent. Examiners noted the
inaccurate date in the following fields:
• Action Taken;
• Type of Purchaser of Loan (the type of entity purchasing the loan within the same
calendar year);
• Loan Amount (in thousands); and
• Gross Annual Income (in thousands, relied on in processing the application).
In 21 files, examiners determined that the type of purchaser of the loan was coded incorrectly as
“other type of purchaser” on the HMDA LAR. The Bank incorrectly coded each loan it
originated and closed in its own name as “other type of purchaser” regardless of whether the loan
was sold within the same calendar year. The applicable code identifying the type of entity
purchasing the loan, as defined in Appendix A to Part 1003 of Regulation C, must be chosen
when the loan originated was then sold within the same calendar year.
In nine files, examiners determined that the loan amount stated on the HMDA LAR was
inaccurate. The differences varied from $500 to several thousand dollars. Management
indicated that the larger variances were due to changes in the amounts due to collateral values,
but the loan documentation did not support these changes.
In one loan file, examiners determined that the HMDA LAR entry for gross annual income of the
applicant was inaccurate. It appears that the income reported on the HMDA LAR came from
documentation in the file, which was not used to document the final underwriting decision.
The Bank’s procedures for HMDA input and validation are not commensurate with its size and
complexity. For several years, the Bank’s prudential regulator has directed the Bank to
implement procedures to improve HMDA data integrity. Previous Federal Reserve Examination
Reports addressed the need for the Bank to implement procedures to correct previous HMDA
data errors. The persistence of HMDA data errors in spite of the repeated notification requires
corrective action.