Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Can we trust;
a) the structural analyses ?
b) the fabrication quality ?
c) the technical documentation?
d) the inspection process ?
Condition Perform
Assessment – inspection –
The process of The process
What to be done
of How to do
Page 7
Operational part of SIM
• Supervice inspection
• Adjust program
• Define and secure proper repair and modification
• Deliveries:
a) Inspection reports
b) Insp.eng- reports
c) Integrity reports
d) Design of modification
e) M&R reports (Modification & Repair )
Main Conclusion
• Traditional follow-up regime
– 20-40% of the detected cracks are in accordance with the initial fatigue analyses
– Crack growth does mainly occur at details given poor fabrication quality
– All units given comparable amount of inspections
• Refined Follow up and RBI (level 3 and partially level 2)
– The calculations are based on As-Is description
– 70-80% of the fatigue crack growth are according the calculated crack growth
potential
– The scope of inspection varies from 30 to 200% of a traditional follow up scope
Competance at Site
Unit 1 - As-Is description and improved follow-up regime for
inspection, repair, modifications and weld improvement
Page 15
Main Challenges - 2:
Page 16
Main Challenges - 3
Activity and Competence
• Inspection
• Report inspection results and apply acceptance criteria
• How to close (design) and secure closing (construction) of
findings?
• The Life Cycle Documentation; a) Structural analyses
results and design data, b) Inspection, operation and
construction data
• Condition assessment and program for inspection and
improvements
• Reporting to PSA, Client and Owners
THANKS