Republic of the Philippines )

Taguig City, Metro Manila ) s.s.

x- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x

AFFIDAVIT OF DENIAL
I, PO1 Jeffrey Guitguit Cuizon, of legal age, bonafide member of the Philippine
National Police presently assigned with Northern Police District, Caloocan City Police
Station, Traffic Accident Unit after having been sworn to, in accordance with law do
hereby depose and state:

That, I am one of the PNP personnel which was directed to explain in the
Memorandum dated November 19, 2018 with subject Verification of PNP
Personnel Who Might Have Illegal Activities.

That, I am not the person appearing in the Warrant of Arrest for Criminal Case
No. TC-2011-058 which was filed at 10 th Judicial Region, Regional Trial Court, Branch
16 of Tangub City Davao Del Norte and Criminal Case No. CO 801- Criminal Case No.
MCEB-18-01103- CR both filed at Municipal Trial Circuit Court Branch 2 of Cebu City.

That, a patent difference of the names indicated in the Warrant of Arrest and in
my name indicated in my PNP Personal Data Sheet (PDS) can be recognized easily
even by a person without experienced in investigation.

That, the validation conducted by the PNP organization was not properly
implemented and scrutinized to the full extent of the rules and an obvious shortcoming
of the investigators. I vehemently deny that I am involved in any criminal offense nor
charge of the same in any judicial body in the Philippines.

That, upon receipt of the said directives from the authorities, undersigned have
made all efforts to prove that he is a person of good character with highest standard of
morality and professionalism. (Please see the attached updated NBI Clearance,
Certification from RTC Branch 16 of Tangub Davao Del Norte and letter for MTCC
Branch 2 of Cebu).

That, the above mentioned documents are substantial enough to support a

conclusion that I was never involved in any criminal offense. Elementary is the rule and
it has long been established that in any administrative investigations and quasi-judicial
proceedings, “substantial evidence is sufficient as a basis for judgment. Substantial
evidence has been defined to be such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might
accept as adequate to support a conclusion”. (Domasig vs. NLRC, G.R. No. 118101,
September 16, 1996). Since the abovementioned documents conform and satisfy the
requirements, hence, the validation or investigation against me should be set aside.

That, I knew and believed in good faith that I have never committed any
infraction that would implicate myself to be charged with a criminal or administrative
offense since I knew for a fact that I am not an earring PNP personnel.

Gleaned from the foregoing, supported by substantial evidence and

jurisprudence, there is a clear showing that I could not be held criminally and
administratively liable in any judicial and quasi-judicial body.

That, I attest to the truthfulness of this and submit to the legal and administrative
consequences thereof if ever the statements above are wanting in truth and in
substance.
 PO1 Jeffrey Guitguit Cuizon
AFFIANT

Subscribed and sworn to before me this ___th day of December 2018 at Camp
Bagong Diwa, Lower Bicutan Taguig City.

_____________________
Administering Officer