Sie sind auf Seite 1von 6

International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 5 (x) (2017) xxx-xxx

International Journal of Engineering & Technology


Website: www.sciencepubco.com/index.php/IJET
doi:
Research paper, Short communication, Review, Technical paper

Evaluation Model of the Implementation of Quality


Managemen System of Electrical Skills in Vocational High
School
I Gede Budi Mahendra1*, Giri Wiyono2, Asnul Dahar Minghat3
1
Electrical Engineering Education of Postgraduate Departement, Yogyakarta State University, Indonesia
2
Faculty of Engineering, Yogyakarta State University, Indonesia
3
Razak Faculty of Technology and Informatics, University of Technology Malaysia

*Corresponding author E-mail:igede.endra@gmail.com

Abstract

This study aims to find out (1) the proper evaluation model is used to evaluate the implementation of the quality management system
for electricity expertise in vocational schools (2) components of the evaluation model, and (3) the criteria for effectiveness of the
evaluation program. The method used is litelature study with research data sources in the form of textbooks, journals, scientific
articles, magazines, newspapers, and. The results obtained are (1) CIPP evaluation model is the most suitable model used in
evaluating the implementation of the quality management of electricity expertise in vocational schools. (2) CIPP evaluation model
consists of 4 components, namely Context, input, process, product. (3) Criteria for the effectiveness of the evaluation program on the
4 components of the CIPP evaluation model in the form of criteria for Context effectiveness, criteria for input effectiveness, process
effectiveness criteria, and criteria for product effectiveness.

Keywords: Evaluation Model, Quality Management System, Vocational High School.

Copyright © 2016 Authors. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits
unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
activities in the school the problem of school
1. Introduction implementation of ISO environment. vocational culture [4]. The
quality management system medium. The whole process implementation of the ISO
Vocational High School as an international quality of learning activities should quality management system
is one of the levels of standard will consistently follow the learning climate will be better and success
formal secondary education improve efficiency in conditions and conditions will be achieved if it is
in Indonesia. Vocational managing school resources that are in accordance with accompanied by a school
High School is an advanced and school quality [2]. In ISO-based quality vision that is the overall
secondary education which addition, it is hoped that management systems. If responsibility of the school
has the main objective of there will be a continuous applied and entrenched, the community and not only the
preparing a skilled, improvement process for application of an ISO responsibility of
professional and highly school performance so that quality management system individuals, especially
disciplined workforce in the quality and output of will be able to improve the leaders. On the other hand,
accordance with the schools as an educational quality of customer service the success of vocational
demands of the workforce institution always gets and indirectly improve the high schools in obtaining
which has the aim of better over time. ISO-based quality of the learning ISO certificates requires
preparing graduates to work quality management system process in the vocational high quality culture in the
in certain fields that are in aims to improve the high school environment. In management of leadership
line with market needs in competitiveness of an general, the implementation organizations in a
this case the business world institution in this case of an ISO quality vocational high school. The
and the world work [1]. The educational institutions in management system in ISO certificate that has been
implementation of order to improve the vocational secondary obtained must be
vocational secondary process of providing schools has constraints maintained with the
schools is one of the efforts education to ensure which include the first, acculturation of the quality
made by the Indonesian customer satisfaction. One namely the application of must be integrated in all
government to improve and focus of the ISO principle is ISO quality management policy actors in the
improve existing human the costomer focus or focus systems that are not yet organization within the
resources. The needs of the on the customer. Customers entrenched, service and school itself. Considering
work world for quality of educational institutions documentation to be this, the commitment of
human resources and internally are teachers and increasingly complicated so vocational secondary
skilled forcing and staff in schools, while that it needs a good schools in implementing the
encouraging an educational externally customers of evaluation to uncover all ISO quality management
institution is no exception, educational institutions are aspects of the quality system in ensuring
namely vocational high parents of students and the management system. Lack customer satisfaction needs
schools to conduct a quality community [3]. Efforts to of consistency in the evaluation. The evaluation
assurance of the educational improve the quality of performance of internal of the implementation of
process held, it is done in services through the vocational high schools, the ISO quality
the hope of getting positive implementation of a quality this is characterized by the management system aims to
values and customer management system were ups and downs of the provide benefits in the
satisfaction can be fulfilled. not accompanied by performance of educators application of a quality
Quality graduates are students' understanding, so and education personnel, culture in vocational
printed by schools that have that many of them did not besides that vocational secondary schools so as to
quality assurance as well. understand the meaning and secondary schools find it produce quality learning to
With the demands of function of the ISO in their difficult to focus their work prepare vocational high
globalization, schools that schools. Thus, students in accordance with ISO school graduates to work in
have quality quality have not been able to feel demands because there are certain fields that are in line
assurance will continue to the results of implementing many jobs in each with the needs of the
improve the existing ISO in their schools. vocational high school workforce. One factor in
education services. Improve Currently, not all educators work unit. And the most the success of vocational
aspects that support a and related parties have important thing that is an education is an absorption
school to improve the implemented or cultivated obstacle in the application of graduate to the World of
quality of school education an ISO-based quality of ISO quality management Industries. It is important to
services. Implementing an management system in the systems in vocational high study the World
ISO quality management process of learning schools is the difficulty of Development Quality in the
system is one of the efforts activities in vocational adaptation of teachers or vocational high school as a
that can be done to carry secondary schools, besides employees to the means of improving the
out quality assurance in that not all values in the development of information partnership that produces
violating the educational ISO-based quality and technology. Common vocational relevance of
process in an educational management system are constraints experienced by education to the labor
institution. The applied in academic vocational high schools are market. [5]. The evaluation
Copyright © 2016 Authors. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits
unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
International Journal of Engineering & Technology 3

process requires a suitable collected so that it was the work' to how people relationships; vocational
method to evaluate a analyzed into a conclusion. think and talk and behave: a high school institution and
program to produce 'quality culture'. (3) its customers are
maximum evaluation 3. Results and Involvement of people; interdependent partnership
because Project quality Discussion Involving people across all and a mutually beneficial
management is the process levels of the Institution is relationship enhances the
required that ensures that ISO quality management one of the effective ways to ability of both to create
the project meets system is recognized as an achieve quality. The value. [8]
requirements and international standard on vocational high school
expectations of the best practices in internal institutions should take full 3.1. Evaluation Model to
beneficiary involved in the quality management [6]. advantage of the staff's Evaluate the
projec [16]. Thus this study knowledge and experience; Implementation of the
ISO 9001: 2008 gives a
aims to: (1) Knowing the clarify their job and Electricity
series of general
right evaluation model is responsibility requirements Management Quality
requirements that can be
used to evaluate the and make them realize that Management System
applied irrespective of the in Vocational Schools
implementation of the organization’s activity, size reaching the Institution's
power management quality or ownership. The direct objectives is their own
management system in objectives. (4) Process In the field of education,
benefit that can be realized evaluation is an assessment
vocational high schools, (2) approach; A desired result is
from the implementation of in this field or an
Components of the achieved more efficiently
ISO 9001: 2008 is the assessment of matters
evaluation model and, (3) when the activities and the
combined alignment of the relating to educational
the criteria for effectiveness related resources are
activities of internal activities. Evaluation of
of the evaluation program managed as a process,
processes that are focused education programs is an
on the implementation of rather than as individual
towards the improvement of evaluation that measures
the quality management tasks. Managing these educational activities that
customer satisfaction which
system for electricity activities provides greater provide basic services that
will result in many other
expertise in vocational efficiencies through a clear are sustainable and involve
reimbursements, whether
secondary schools. view of what is happening. educational curricula.
internal or external. [7]
Eight principles of quality (5) System approach to Evaluation of educational
2. Research Methods management; Management programs also means
management are methods of
how to lead, regulate, and should view all activities activities to examine the
This research is a study and processes as parts of an shortcomings of education
control a school
literature that provides a integrated system. This will activities or implementation
organization in accordance
logical description in then contribute to the and to find out the
accordance with the with the ISO 9001: 2008
institution's effectiveness achievement of educational
objectives of the study. This quality management
and efficiency in achieving program objectives. thus
is done by giving meaning system. These eight quality evaluation is very important
management principles its objectives. (6) Continual
to the data that has been in education programs
(Point Development improvement; Continual
collected which is carried including evaluation of the
International, 2008) are as improvement of the
out from beginning to end. application of quality
follows: (1) Customer vocational high school
This analysis and management systems.
interpretation is done by focus; Successful institution's overall
therefore an appropriate
referring to the theory or vocational high school performance should be a evaluation is needed to
the results of the research in institutions are reliant upon permanent feature of the evaluate the application of
accordance with the their customers, thus HE sector that really wishes to the quality management
problems to be solved. To should understand their excel within labor system in this case to the
make it easier to see the current and future needs, marketplace. The education electrical engineering
results of the summary, a meet their requirements, institution can improve the expertise in the vocational
matrix is created. In the and measure their quality system by managing middle school. The most
pattern of the matrix form satisfaction degree. (2) the auditing periodically appropriate evaluation
can be seen a complete Leadership; Leaders of and continuously for the model is used to evaluate
picture of certain parts of vocational high school daily tasks. (7) Factual the implementation of a
the research results. On the approach to decision quality management
institutions establish unity
basis of the pattern shown making; In vocational high system. therefore, an
of purpose and direction.
in the data presentation, it school institution, effective appropriate evaluation is
They should create and
can be concluded that the decisions should be based needed to evaluate the
data collected has meaning. maintain the internal
on analysis of data and implementation of the
As explained earlier in this environment in which
information that has been quality management system
study that the analysis people can become fully in this case the electricity
involved in achieving the gathered via predetermined
process was carried out engineering expertise in the
institution's objectives. This measures. (8) Mutually
since the initial data was vocational middle class is
goes beyond merely 'doing beneficial supplier
the CIPP evaluation model
4 International Journal of Engineering & Technology

[9]. CIPP is an evaluation evaluation, with the and alternative strategies 1. Context
model that uses a intention of not to prove, offered in similar programs The context evaluation
management-oriented but rather improve, the [14]. The intent of this primarily leads to
approach or referred to as a program itself [11]. An stage is to choose an identification
form of program evaluation following the appropriate strategy to strengths and
management evaluation. CIPP model may include a implement to resolve the weaknesses of the
The CIPP model rests on context, input, process, or program problem [12]. In organization and in
the view that the most product evaluation, or a addition to context providing input to
important goal of program combination of these evaluation and input improve the
evaluation is not to prove, elements [11]. The context evaluation, reviewing organization. The
but to improve. In this evaluation stage of the program quality is a key main objective of
decision-oriented approach, CIPP Model creates the big element to CIPP. Process context evaluation
program evaluation is picture of where both the evaluation investigates the is assessing all
defined as the “systematic program and evaluation quality of the program’s organizational
collection of information [14]. This stage assists in implementation. In this conditions,
about the activities, decision-making related to stage, program activities are identifying its
characteristics, and planning, and enables the monitored, documented and weakness,
outcomes of programs to evaluator to identify the assessed by the evaluator inventory its
make judgments about the needs, assets, and resources [12][14]. Primary strengths that can
program, improve program of a community in order to objectives of this stage are be utilized to cover
effectiveness, and/or inform provide programming that to provide feedback up its weaknesses,
decisions about future will be beneficial [12][14]. regarding the extent to diagnose problems
programming [10]. The Context evaluation also which planned activities are faced by the
CIPP evaluation model (see identifies the political carried out, guide staff on organization, and
figure 1) is a framework for climate that could influence how to modify and improve find solutions.
guiding evaluations of the success of the program the program plan, and Evaluation context
programs, projects, [14]. To achieve this, the assess the degree to which also aims to assess
personnel, products, evaluator compiles and participants can carry out what goals are and
institutions, and evaluation assesses background their roles [11]. The final predetermined
systems [11] information, and interviews component to priorities meet
program leaders and CIPP, product evaluation, needs parties who
stakeholders. Key assesses the positive and are the target of
stakeholders in the negative effects the the organization.
evaluation are identified. In program had on its target 2. Input
addition, program goals are audience [14], assessing Input evaluation is
assessed, and data reporting both the intended and specifically intended to help
on the program unintended outcomes [11]. determine the program to
environment is collected. Both short-term and long- make changes required.
Data collection can use term outcomes are judged. Evaluate inputs looking for
multiple formats. These During this stage, obstacles and potential
include both formative and judgments of stakeholders available resources. The
summative measures, such and relevant experts are main goal is to help clients
as environmental analysis analyzed, viewing examine alternatives
of existing documents, outcomes that impact the relating to needs
program profiling, case group, subgroups, and organizational and
study interviews, and individual. Applying a organizational goals. In
Fig 1: Components of
Stufflebeam’s CIPP Model
stakeholder interviews [14]. combination of other words, input
Throughout this process, methodological techniques evaluation serves to help
Designed to assist continual dialogue with the assure all outcomes are clients avoid futile
administrators in making client to provide updates is noted and assist in verifying innovations and are
informed decisions, CIPP is integral. To complement evaluation findings [14] expected to fail or at least
a popular evaluation context evaluation, input [11]. waste of resources.
approach in educational evaluation can be
3. Process
settings [12][13]. This completed. In this stage, 3.2. Components of
approach, developed in the information is collected Evaluation Model
late 1960s, seeks to regarding the mission,
improve and achieve goals, and plan of the Mahmudi (2011)[9] The
accountability in program. Its purpose is to CIPP model has four
educational programming assess the program’s continuous elements.
through a “learning-by- strategy, merit and work
doing” approach [13]. Its plan against research, the
core concepts are context, responsiveness of the
input, process, and product program to client needs,
International Journal of Engineering & Technology 5

Process evaluation basically Product evaluation aims to assessment criterion. 4. Product Criteria
checks implementation measure, interpret, Assessment criteria include The product criteria cover
predetermined plan. The and assess the following: all activities of the process
goal is to give input for the program 1. Context criteria of applying the quality
manager or manager and his achievements. For Context criteria in the management of electrical
staff regarding suitability further details, Application of Electrical engineering expertise in
between the implementation Product evaluation Engineering Expertise vocational high schools,
of the plan and the schedule aims to assess the Quality Management at including the teaching and
that has been made success of the Vocational High Schools, it learning process. The
previously and the efficient program in is said to be effective if: (a) product component is said
use of available resources. meeting program The school has planned to be effective if: (a) The
If the plan needs to be target needs. community needs and relationship between
modified or developed, Assessments about expectations through the teachers and students, the
process evaluation provides the success of this field of activities, vision, relationship between the
instructions. There are still program or mission and school world of work and the
goals another thing worth organization objectives or school profile. school and students is well
noting, which is to assess collected from (b) The head of the school established and mutually
periodically how much far people involved has determined the quality beneficial. (b)There is
the acceptance of the individually or policy and school quality supervision and evaluation
program participants and collective, and objectives. of quality policies and
their success in carrying out then analyzed. 2. Input Criteria quality objectives as a
their roles; and give notes That is, success or Evaluation of inputs is preventive/corrective and
the complete program failures intended for school corrective action.
implementation of the plan are analyzed from readiness (principals,
and its comparison with its various points of teachers, students, and 5. Conclusion
original purpose. Process view. facilities and
evaluation can review the infrastructure). The input CIPP evaluation model is
organization's plans 3.3. Criteria For criteria for the success of the most suitable model
previous evaluations to Effectiveness Of the Implementation of used in evaluating the
identify aspects important Evaluation Quality Management of application of quality
from the organization that Electricity Engineering management of electricity
must be monitored. Here Evaluation activities are Expertise at Vocational expertise to vocational high
you have to Keep in mind is always related to High Schools are said to be schools because it has a
that the evaluation process predetermined criteria that effective if: (a) Teachers are more holistic, detailed and
is primarily aimed at ensure are the objectives of the involved in work broad approach of the
the process. Deviations program. The basis of mechanisms, quality plans, object being evaluated.
from the plan originally consideration makes it easy and training, (b) Control of CIPP evaluation model
explained. The main for evaluators to consider documents and recordings consists of 4 components,
function of process the value or price of the as evidence of school namely Context, input,
evaluation is to provide program components that activities. process, product. Criteria
input that can help they judge, whether they 3. Process Criteria for the effectiveness of the
organizational staff run have been successful in Process criteria cover all evaluation program on the 4
program according to plan, accordance with the activities of the process of components of the CIPP
or maybe modify a plan that previous provisions or not. applying the quality evaluation model in the
turns out to be bad. In turn, In this evaluation the management of electrical form of criteria for Context
process evaluation be a approach that will be used engineering expertise in effectiveness, criteria for
source of information that is is a fidelty approach, where vocational high schools. input effectiveness, process
vital for interpreting results the criteria have been set Process components are effectiveness criteria, and
product evaluation. before. In this approach the said to be effective if: (a) criteria for product
4. Product criteria approach used is an The existence of standard effectiveness. Context
approach that refers to the operating procedures and criteria (a) The school has
success criteria for the work procedures for planned the needs and
implementation of the learning procedures to expectations of the
quality management control the learning process. community through the
program of electrical (b) The existence of field of activities, vision,
engineering expertise in accurate data and mission and goals of the
vocational secondary information in making school (b) The principal
schools referring to the decisions such as survey sets the quality policy and
principles of the data on the level of school quality objectives.
implementation of quality satisfaction of the working Input Criteria (a) The
management systems. [15] world of graduate users. teacher is involved in the
Determining the success of work mechanism, quality
a program requires an plan, and training (b) There
6 International Journal of Engineering & Technology

is control of documents and Volume 1, Number 1, learning programs.


June 2015 (13-24). Journal of higher
records as evidence of [6] Lazibat T., Sutic I., education and outreach
school activities. Process Jurcevic M. (2009). engagement 15(4), 57 –
Criteria (a) The existence of Quality management 83.
standard operating system at the faculty of [14] Mertens, D. & Wilson,
economics and A. (2012). Program
procedures and learning business, in: proc. of evaluation theory and
work instructions (b) The 31st Annual EAIR practice: A
existence of accurate data Forum in Vilnius, comprehensive guide.
and information in making Lithuania. New York: Guilford
[7] Giri Wiyono.(2013). Press. EISBN:
decisions. Product Criteria Pengembangan Model 9781462503254.
(a) The relationship Sekolah Bermutu Total [15] Setiyana (2016).
between the teacher and the (Total Quality School) Evaluasi Implementasi
students, the relationship di SMK untuk Sistem Manajemen
Peningkatan Mutu Mutu ISO 9001:2008 di
between the world of work Pendidikan Kejuruan. SMA Negeri
and the school and students Seminar Nasional 2Yogyakarta dan SMA
are well established and Pendidikan Teknik BOPKRI 1
mutually beneficial (b) Elektro 2013.UNY Yogyakarta. S2 thesis,
[8] A. El-Morsy, H. UNY
There is supervision and Shafeek, Abdullah [16] Tauseef Aized.(2010).
evaluation of quality Alshehri, Saud A. Total Quality
policies and quality Gutub.(2014). Management and Six
objectives as a preventive Implementation of Sigma. InTech. ISBN
Quality Management 978-953-51-0688-3,
and improvement measure. System by Utilizing 306 pages.
ISO 9001:2008 Model [17]
References in the Emerging
Faculties. Life Science
[1] Bekti Wulandari, & Journal 2014;11(8)
Herman Dwi Surjono. [9] Mahmudi.(2011).CIPP:
(2013). Pengaruh Suatu Model Evaluasi
Problem-Based Program Pendidikan.
Learning Terhadap ejournal UNIDA. Vol.
Hasil Belajar Ditinjau 6, No. 1, Juni 2011.
Dari Motivasi Belajar [10] Patton, Q. M. (1997).
PLC di SMK. Utilization focused
Yogyakarta. Jurnal evaluation: The new
Pendidikan Vokasi, Vol century text (3rd Ed.),
3, Nomor 2. ISSN London: Sage
2088-2866 Publications.
[2] Geoffrey D.Doherty. [11] Stufflebeam, D. (2003).
(2005). Developing The CIPP model of
quality systems in evaluation. In T.
education. 11 New Kellaghan, D.
Fetter Lane, London Stufflebeam & L.
EC4P 4EE. ISBN 0- Wingate (Eds.),
203-42366-6 Master e- Springer international
book ISBN handbooks of
[3] Sallis, Edward. (2012). education: International
Total Quality handbook of
Management in educational evaluation.
Education. Yogyakarta: Retrieved.
IRCiSod. [12] Fitzpatrick, J., Sanders,
[4] Candra, I Wayan J., & Worthen, B.
(2012), Studi Evaluatif (2011). Program
Implementasi evaluation: Alternative
Penerapan Manajemen approaches and
Berbasis Sekolah di practical guidelines (4th
SMK Negeri 3 Ed.). New York: Allyn
Singaraja, Kabupaten & Bacon. Canadian
Buleleng, Propinsi Bali. Publisher: Pearson.
Tesis, Administrasi ISBN: 978-0-205-
Pendidikan, Program 57935-8.
Pascasarjana, [13] Zhang, G., Zeller, N.,
Universitas Pendidikan Griffith, R., Metcalf,
Ganesha. D., Williams, J., Shea,
[5] Felestin & Mochamad C. & Misulis, K.
Bruri Triyono.(2015). (2011). Using the
The Implementation Of context, input, process,
Total Quality and product evaluation
Management At model (CIPP) as a
Vocational High comprehensive
Schools In Indonesia framework to guide the
Research And planning,
Evaluation In implementation, and
Education Journal assessment of service-

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen