Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
net/publication/284663109
CITATIONS READS
4 3,699
3 authors:
Zdeněk Sokol
Czech Technical University in Prague
30 PUBLICATIONS 129 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Kamila Cabová on 03 April 2017.
INTRODUCTION
This paper describes the mechanical behaviour of steel column base of circular hollow section
(CHS) composed of a base plate and anchor bolts subjected to bending moment and an axial force.
The analytical model based on component method, uses the behaviour of each part of the joint to
build a realistic picture of a connection’s characteristic, the resistance and rotational stiffness, is
introduced. By component method the connection is disintegrated into two parts: base plate in
bending and concrete in compression and base plate in bending and anchor bolts in tension. The
effective length of T-stub in tension is described analytically (by the yield line theory) and
evaluated by finite element simulation in ANSYS with non-linear behaviour of material. The
influence of bolt position on the propagation of yield line patterns is compared by the help of four
simulations. Formulas for all possible failure cases which can arise thanks to different bolt position
for CHS column base are stated. Finally, the distribution of yield line mechanism depending on
position of bolt is summed into one figure. Procedure of base plate design follows rules in Eurocode
3, Part 1–8: Design of joints.
1 ANALYTICAL MODEL
where FRd,u is the strength of the component, fjd is the design value of the bearing strength.
The proposed design model for resistance of the components base plate in bending and concrete in
compression as well as all needed formulas are given in [5].
The proposed design model for stiffness of the components base plate in bending and concrete in
compression is given also in [5]. From the deformation of the component the formula to calculate
the stiffness coefficient given in Eq. (2) can be derived.
E c a eq.el L
kc = (2)
1,275 E
where Ec is the Young's modulus of concrete, aeq,el is the equivalent width of the T-stub, L is length
of the T-stub, E is the Young's modulus of steel.
1.3 Base plate in bending and anchor bolts in tension
The base plate in bending and anchor bolts in tension are the main components of the base plate
connection [4]. The behaviour of these parts is described similarly to the beam to column end plate
connection, by the help of T-stub model. The design model of this component for resistance as well
for stiffness is given in [4]. When the base plate is in contact with concrete surface, the prying of
bolts appears and on the contrary no prying forces occur in the case of separated base plate from the
concrete block due to the deformation of long bolts. In [1] prying forces are neglected. When the
column base is loaded by bending moment as it is shown in Fig. 2, anchor bolts transfer tensile
forces. This case of loading leads to elongation of anchor bolts and bending of the base plate.
Deformed bolts can cause failure as well as reaching of the yield strength of the base plate.
Sometimes failure in this tensile zone is caused by both, see [6]. The design resistance of a T-stub
of flange in tension of effective length ℓeff is determined as minimum resistance of three possible
plastic collapse mechanisms. Because of the long anchor bolts and thick base plate different failure
mode arises compare to an end plate connection. When the T-stub is uplifted from the concrete
foundation (there is no prying), new collapse mode mode 1-2 is obtained. In cases where no prying
forces develop, the design resistance of the T-stub is given in Eq. (3) [6].
FRd = min( F1−2.Rd , F3.Rd ) (3)
where F1− 2.Rd is minimum resistance of mode 1-2, F3.Rd is minimum resistance of mode 3.
The equivalent length of T-stub leff, which is very important for the resistance determination, is
calculated by the help of the yield line method.
Fig. 1. Flexible base plate as a rigid plate of Fig. 2. Tensile zone – equivalent T-stub after
effective area with effective width c loading by bending moment
Table 1. Failure cases of CHS column base plate
b (a − a1 )
2
b1 + 1
2
b
l eff ,1 = π m l eff , 2 = b − b b1 − e b a1 − e a
1
2 l eff ,.3 = +
4 a1 − e a b1 − e b
a (b − b1 )
2
a1 + 1
2
a
l eff , 7 = π m l eff ,6 = ( a − a ) b1 − eb a1 − ea
1
2 l eff , 4 = +
4 a1 − ea b1 − eb
a1 + b1 eb e a
2 2
l eff ,5 = + Partition of the yield line mechanism for different bolt positions
4 e a eb
The calculation of the effective length is a function of the position of the anchor bolt. By moving
the anchor bolt around the column corner (changing ea and eb), distribution of the yield line
mechanism, which is also summed up in Table 1, is obtained.
The prediction of the base plate stiffness is based on [4]. In case of no prying the stiffness of the
component of base plate in bending and bolts in tension is summarised in Eq. (5).
where kT is the stiffness of the T-stub, kb is the stiffness of the bolt, kp is the stiffness of the plate.
1.5 Resistance and stiffness of CHS base
The calculation of the column base resistance, based on the force equilibrium on the base plate, is
given in [3]. In case the connection is loaded by axial force NEd and bending moment MEd, the
equilibrium of internal forces is shown in Fig. 3. The position of the neutral axis is calculated
according to resistance of the tension part FT,Rd. Then the bending resistance MRd can be determined
providing the plastic distribution of internal forces. The effective area Aeff under the base plate,
which is demonstrated in Fig. 3 like an active part of equivalent rigid plate, is calculated from an
equivalent T-stub, with an effective width c. The compression force is assumed to act at the centre
of the compressed part. The tensile force is located at the anchor bolts or in the middle when there
are more rows or bolts [3].
Fig. 6. Max. stress area with bolt in [80; 80] Fig. 7. Max. stress area with bolt in [260; 80]
Fig. 8. Max. stress area with bolt in [210; 80] Fig. 9. Max. stress area with bolt in [210; 40]
3 SUMMARY
The introduced analytical model shows a good prediction of the behaviour of CHS column base
plates. It allows the prediction of resistance and stiffness for engineering purposes. The yield line
patterns which can arise thanks to different bolt position are summed up to show its partition better.
In case of no-prying, the yield line mechanisms of CHS column base plate are evaluated by the help
of software. The materially non-linear analysis, worked out in ANSYS, shows good agreement with
results obtained from analytical model.
REFERENCES
[1] Horova, K, “Base plates of hollow sections”, Diploma thesis, Prague, 2010.
[2] EN 1993-1-8, Eurocode 3, Design of steel structures, Part 1-8, Design of Joints, CEN, Brussels 2005.
[3] Wald, F, Sokol, Z, Steenhouis, M, Jaspart, JP, “Component Method for Steel
Column Bases”, Heron. 2008, vol. 53, no. 1/2, s. 3-20, ISSN 0046-7316.
[4] Wald, F, Sokol, Z, Jaspart, JP, “Base Plate in Bending and Anchor Bolts in
Tension”, Heron. 2008, vol. 53, no. 1/2, s. 21-50, ISSN 0046-7316.
[5] Steenhouis, M, Wald, F, Sokol, Z, Stark, JWB, “Concrete in Compression and Base Plate in Bending”,
Heron. 2008, vol. 53, no. 1/2, s. 51-68, ISSN 0046-7316.
[6] Gresnight, N, Romeijn, A, Wald, F, Steenhouis, M, “Column Bases in Shear and Normal Force”, Heron.
2008, vol. 53, no. 1/2, s. 87-108, ISSN 0046-7316.
[7] Wald, F, Bouguin, V, Sokol, Z, Muzeau, JP, “Effective length of T-stub of RHS column base plates”.
[8] Wald, F, “Column bases”, CTU Prague, June 1995.
[9] Wald, F, Sokol, Z, “Navrhování styčníků”, Vydavatelství ČVUT, 1999.
[10] Wardenier, J, Dutta, D, Yeomans, N, Packer, JA, Bucak, O, “Design guide for structural hollow section
in mechanical applications”, CIDECT, Construction with hollow section steel sections, Verlag TUV
Rheinland Gmbh, Köln, 1995.
[11] Bouguin, V, “Column Bases of the Rectangular Hollow Sections Columns”, Diploma theses, Clermont
Ferrand, 2000.
[12] Manenc, G, “Base plates of circular hollow sections”, Diploma thesis, 2004.
[13] Wardenier, J, “Rectangular Hollow Section Joints”, Delft University of Technology, Oslo Course 2009.
[13] ANSYS Release 11.0: Documentation for Ansys.