Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
REGULAR MEETING OF THE SAN MARCOS ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS
Thursday, January 17, 2019 5:45 P.M. City Council Chambers
Michael Nolen, Chair Gloria Fortin, Vice Chair
Rick Henderson, Member Wayman Jones, Member
Gary Pack, Member Nicholas Costilla, Alternate
Tom Rowe, Alternate
AGENDA
U
1. Call to order.
2. Roll call.
N
3. Chairperson’s Opening Remarks.
4. Citizen Comment Period.
5. Consider approval of the minutes of the ZBOA Regular Meeting of August 16, 2018.
6. VR‐19‐01 Hold a public hearing and consider a request by Matt Goebel, on behalf of San Marcos Green Investors,
LLC, for reinstatement of nonconforming rights per Section 1.5.1.9 of the San Marcos Development in order to allow
reconstruction of previously destroyed multifamily units at 222 Ramsay Street also known as “Iconic Village.”
(M.Johnson)
7. Hold a discussion and consider approval of the Zoning Board of Adjustments 2019 Regular Meeting
schedule.
8. Question and Answer Session with Press and Public. This is an opportunity for the Press and Public to ask
questions related to items on this agenda.
9. Adjourn.
U
NOTE: The Zoning Board of Adjustments may adjourn into Executive Session to consider any item listed on this agenda if a
U
matter is raised that is appropriate for Executive Session discussion. An announcement will be made of the basis for the
Executive Session discussion. The Zoning Board of Adjustments may also publicly discuss an item listed on the agenda for
Executive Session.
The City of San Marcos does not discriminate on the basis of disability in the admission or access to its services, programs, or
activities. Individuals who require auxiliary aids and services for this meeting should contact the City of San Marcos ADA
Coordinator at 512‐393‐8000 (voice) or call Texas Relay Service (TRS) by dialing 7‐1‐1. Requests can also be faxed to 512‐
393‐8074 or sent by e‐mail to ADArequest@sanmarcostx.gov
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
SAN MARCOS ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS
San Marcos City Council Chambers
630 East Hopkins, San Marcos, TX 78666
August 16, 2018
1. Call to Order
With a quorum present, the Regular Meeting of the San Marcos Zoning Board of
Adjustments was called to order by Chair Nolen at 5:51 p.m.
2. Roll Call
5. Consider approval of the minutes of the ZBOA Regular Meeting of June 21, 2018.
MOTION: Chair Fortin made a motion to approve the minutes with the following
correction: Add the second by Board Member Pack on the 2nd motion to amend for VR-
18-03. The motion was seconded by Chair Nolen. Following a voice vote, the motion
passed 5-0
1 of 3
6. VR-18-04 Hold a public hearing and consider a request by Phil Moncada, on behalf
of Auspro Enterprises, for a variance to Section 7.2.6.1 of the San Marcos
Development Code which regulates the allowable height and opaqueness of fences
and walls. The applicant is requesting to keep an approximately 9 foot 10 inch high
wall that was erected without a permit at 910 N IH 35. (W. Parrish)
There were no additional citizen comments. Chair Nolen closed the public hearing.
MOTION: Board Member Fortin made a motion to deny the request. The motion was
seconded by Board Member Pack. Following discussion and a roll call vote, the motion
passed 5-0.
Amanda Hernandez presented this item and requested a consensus of the Board to cancel
the regularly scheduled meeting on December 20, 2018 due to the proximity of the
meeting to the Christmas holiday.
No one spoke.
9. Adjournment
There being no further business for the Zoning Board of Adjustments, Chair Nolen
adjourned the meeting at 6:18 PM on Thursday August 16, 2018.
_________________________________ ___________________________________
Michael Nolen, Chair Gloria Fortin, Vice Chair
_________________________________ ___________________________________
Gary Pack, Member Rick Henderson, Member
ATTEST:
_________________________________ _________________________________
Wayman Jones, Member Amanda Hernandez,
Development Services Manager
2 of 3
VR-
19-01
Aer
ial
I
conicVil
lage— 222Ramsay St
La
m
ar
Av
e
St
sa
y
am
R
Q
ua
Hl
il
Ln
Cr
en
ee
r
k
ay
eW
l
Dr
da
us
an
Ho
M E
Bl
ue
bo
nn
et
C
l
ar
St k
Dr
ger Av
N e
un
Yo LB
t
lC
J
na
D
r
di
ar
C
t
tS
WB
nu
al
l
ueb
W
onn
C
he
etD
st
nu
r
tS
t
St
_
^
e
re
ht
ac
Pe
0 2 4
Miles
_
^ Sit
eLocat
Subj
ion
ectPr
oper
ty ´ 0 150 300
Par
cel been prepared for or be suitable for legal, engineering, or
surveying purposes. It does not represent an on-the-ground
Cit
y Limit survey and represents only the approximate relative location of
property boundaries.
Map Date: 1/3/2019
Document Path: Y:\_Planning Current\P&Z\2019 Staff Reports\VR\VR-19-01\GIS\VR-19-01 AerialMap.mxd
VR-19-01
Av Lam 92
e ar
0 3
400'Noti
ficati
onBuffer
41 R43
93 ar
33 m
R4 8 La ve
Iconi
cVill
age— 222Ram say St
R4 1 La ve
40 A
41 A
33 ma
91 r 4
Av Lam 94
e ar
2 3
40 R43
68 ar
R4 La e
33 m
03 Av
33 m
R10378 R4 0 La ve
90 ar
109 Panorama Dr
31 A 67 ar
ma 01 9
La 4 338
La 33 am
ve
4
R4
m R 8 L ve
rA
ar 30 A
R4W 2osa
Av
Mi
3 3 16 Ci
Av Lam 36
m
e ar
51 r
1 4
e
32 R10
Av Lam 69
e ar
Av Lam 48
1 3
e ar
31 R43
6 3
30 R43
49 ar
R137806
33 m
Av am 0
N 1350
LBJ Dr
e ar
9 L 37
R4 4 La ve
30 43
R
30 A
Av Lam 71
30 43 e ar
7 3
30 R43
ms 25 96
e
ar 1
Av
Ra 2 340
A Lam 72
am 48
30 R43 ve ar
St
98
5 3
0 L 10
R1
01 3 Ln
ay
32 R
R
R1 11 lay
Av Lam 73
e ar
a
3 3
nd
02 Ma 74 ar
43 Ln 33 m
11
R9 111 lay R4 1 La ve
R1 and
5M
R4 12 J Dr
a
30 A
02 ala
d
t
n
N B
yS
60 30
sa 1
Ma
89 y
am 784
73
L
1 R 13
Mimosa Cir
R43375
W 211
22 R
Ln
R1 10 lay
Ma 200249
Ma R10 105 lay L
02 7 Ln
n
nd 39
yL
10
t
yS
50 e
sa 3
104 House
nd 4
a
am 38
R1 21 say
R1
92 ous l
R43425 Wren Hl
ala
R43426
R
Ma R1 103 lay 3
2 R 10
St
22 129
04 5 St
2
Ra
nd 035
R1 8 H en H
22 R
1
69
y Cr 8 Q 25
a
sa
m
ee ua 2 0 r
Ma R1 101 ay L
k D il R1 1 W
R1 21 say
n
nd 030
1
am
R1 102 lay
2
02 3 St
r
R
22 9
100 House
Q
Ra
Ma
LB 12 424
C 4 Q 251
Wren Hl
01
M
ua
83
Ln
m
J D 24
nd
an
99
LB 12 399
lC reek uail
N 10
Hl
i
da
r
Ln
R
J D 26
l
R1 1 0 1 n e t D
2 4
N 10
Blu
D
en
9 r
Cr 29 Q343 re
ek r
5
r
E on
3
R
02 08 t D
eb
r
88 5 r
Ln
n
R1 10 nne
ay
ee u 0
eW
42
Cre 0 Qu 24
l
ek ail
E bo D
da
k D ail
2 4
t r
us
Dr
e
R1 12 J Dr
Blu
2 3
84 y S R
an
eb 10 260
R1 W 1 onn
R4
22 434
Ho
N B
03 31
23 il
r
Bl
0 3 sa
tD
55 2 Dr
on 06
38 01 et
Blu E R10
34 ua r
ue
R
55
5
L
ne
2
M
84 3 Dr
R1 Ram
R4 6 Qek D
Blu W 277 0 00 et C 1
b
1 r Q
1
ee ua
LB 12 316
1 re
R 1 nn 2
R 7 1 0 ne
53 eb 10 73 E bo r k Dr il
Blu
C
57
J D 04
09 07 t D
E
N 10
22 on 11
eb
04 29 lue 102 920 et D
15
r
on
R
ne
ee u 2
R1 12 J Dr
B
Cr 21 Q343
E
LB 12 211
k D ail
tD 1 6 r R E nn
07 09 05 t D
bo 3
Bl 43 ail
J D 25
r
02 6 S t
N B r
Blue
R7E 10onne 6
2 R4
N 93
ms 01 7
R701004 t Dr Wbonnet Dr
25
R 1 12 1 t nu t
ue Blue r
Ra 2 3499
L 0
43 Qu Dr 4
W onne
r
10 916 net D
R
es
R 1 eb
St
32 t
b
Blu
R
Yo 1 1026 R9 121 ger S
914
Ch
5 b
R2 21 say
049
R 7 k l
on 21 ree 343 uai r
ay
R
E on
LB 10 772
R11 923 t Dr
45 2 St
Ra
2 u 1
ng 9 3 You n 74 ne eb 8 C R4 Q D
J D 00
r 5
52
2 u
N 27
2
m
02 2 St er 77 03 t D E nne t Bl 0 12 Dr 3 k
r
R2 1 0 n n e 1
21 ree
R
R1 121 tnut St C bo R 9 et
Blue
Blue
l
ar W bo E onn
209 Quail
LB 110 553
Creek Dr
R1104000
s 8 C
R43435
St
e
R1 11 J Dr 21
e
h 0 k Blu eb
JD 6
04 02 t St
Dr
C u
N 24
l
1
er
03 19
Av
N
B 2 54
r
1
R
94
R 12 tnu 0
96
LB 102 16 r St
g e 1
R2 100lay L
R 91 0 D r
Ma
102 H Holw
es un 87
eb 10 775
R27715
77
R
E nne t
nd
N
R 1 ge
r
LB 1 54
M a 3 27 7
tD
on 01
76
Ch
Blu W R27
R1053 gbird
R27 915 Dr
o
N 245
ne
W 9 net Dr
nd 00 78
J D 02
76 BJ t
LB l ue b
Yo
55 l C
t
lC
al a
r
E nnet
ummin
R3 1 7 L
n
B
R
45 ina
1
un
ou 11 27 yL
e b o n bo
na
786
4 6
J R2 Card lu
n
r
n 11 B
Av Clar 77
JD
LB 97
S t ger 8
Blueb
di
62
9 D
15 6
e k
N
42 277
11 R37
76 11
1
R10208
22 ut St
r
ar
0 4 st n 30
E 9 net Dr
R3 N 11 J Dr
3
R
R 1 C he
42
C
on
5
N
22
10 20 t S
R 11 tnu 69
Bluebonnet Dr
11
B
42
R2 10 J Dr
t L 5
es R37 108 ut S 57 r R2 77181
N B
Blueb
45 00
R105363
77 13 t D
St
Ch E 9 et Dr
R87712
56
1 stn 9
E 900
L
WB
74 R2 W 9 nne
W9
69 n
ut
e n R26734
02 19 t St t lue bo
ln
Ch R37 106 ut S bo
onnet
1 B E 904
N R2 Dr W 2R277 Wa
26
R 11 tnu Bluebonnet Dr
ue
LB 10 856
1 stn
ueb
Bl
LB 10 704
es
J D 11
N 34
e R26 735
J D 07
Ch Ch
N 7
t Dr
Dr
4
aln 02 64
R3
onn
69 7 St
St
b o 9 1 58
7
Dr
C
ut
u e W 2 77
nn 1
R3 110 tnut
et
he
LB 92 763
9
783
et D
R2 10 J Dr
05 775
Windmill Dr
es 700 st
R27 811 Dr
r
J 0
R2 907net D
N 27
77 8 St
N B
07 05
R48582
R3 10 J D
h t nu
Bl
Dr
BJ 5
T1
109
N B
R
77 01 r
7 5 S R3 101 tnut
53
C W nnet
L
W on
8 L 76
R3 110 tnut
L
W 2 005
r
tS
08
b
R1 E 82 nne
bo
91 7
e
Blu
aln 08 43
Bl
es 07 0
Blue
R
t
03 0 t D
es
Pe 131
76 Dr
ue
ut
Ch 77 10 t St R
Dr
BJ 6
27 903 net
42
h
ac 20 70 St
4 L 76
bo
htr 6 5
C 3 7 R
91 7
ee
R 10 tnu 37 6 n
N R2
W _
^
St
St
7 7
7 08 o
es Wa 204 10 eb
LB 92 714
e
R2 N 9 J Dr Blu
re
Ch R lnut 1
JD 5
776
r
N 37
ac 210 692
t 1 B
r
2 t S 70 R2 817 et Dr
ht
Ch 10 3770 St
R
Pe St
t L 8 Dr
ac
7
ee
6 J W nn 8
R36411
7
7 79
B
7 es 00 9
ebo 1 6 5 r
7 B
htr
77 6 t D
St
Blu
lue
13 nut
88
7 tS
Blu R13W 8o1n3net D
bo
St
8
E nne
e
ebo
7 9 W nne t
Pe
h 0 t t
stn 5
1 7 t R
782
1
ut
3 S N
he 771
2 C
10 2 1 t R3 hes N 37 ueb bo
Peachtree St
R 10 tnu 711 Bl
B l ue
LB 90 718
8C 3
R37691
t C
91 R
es 37 03 t S 659
R27710
6 JD 5 R131801
8 0 et D
r
92
N 8 Dr
Ch R 10 stnu
LBJ
7 7 bo nn
Vis Bue 95
R2lu
ta na
e
r W net Dr 0 2 4
9 3
04 B
e
69
10 R10
Ch
R37717 on W8 Miles
Blueb
R37738 R37706
Peachtree St 915 Chestnut St 906 Chestnut St
Si
teLocati
on
´
_
^ 0 150 300 600
Subj
ect Pr
oper
ty Feet
400' Buffer This product is for informational purposes and may not have
been prepared for or be suitable for legal, engineering, or
Par
cel surveying purposes. It does not represent an on-the-ground
survey and represents only the approximate relative location of
Ci
ty Li
m i
t property boundaries.
Map Date: 1/3/2019
Document Path: Y:\_Planning Current\P&Z\2019 Staff Reports\VR\VR-19-01\GIS\VR-19-01 NotificationMap.mxd
VR-19-01
ZoningMap FD
I
c oni
c Vi
ll
age— 222Ramsay St
SF-
6 La
m
ar
Av
e
MF-
18
St
y
sa
am
R
Q
ua
MF-
24 i
lC
r
Ln
ee
k
Dr
ay
l
da
an
M
D
E
Bl D
DR ue
bo
MU nn
et
St C
l
ger ar
k
Dr
u n Av
Yo e
N
LB
SF-
6 SF-
6
t
lC
J
WB
na
D
di
r
MF-
24
l
ar
u ebo
C
nnet
t
tS
MF-
12
nu
Dr
al
MF-
24
W
_
^
C
he
MU
st
MF-
12
nu
tS
D t
SF-
6
SF-
6
St
e
re
ht
MF-
24
0 2 4
Miles
ac
Pe
_
^ Si
teLoc at
Subj
ion
ec tPropert
y ´ 0 125 250 500
Summary
Request: Reinstate the nonconforming rights, under section 1.5.1.9.A(4), to allow the
reconstruction of multifamily unit that were destroyed at “Iconic Village”.
Applicant: Matt Goebel Property Owner: San Marcos Green Investors, LLC
73 W Monroe Street STE 507 73 W Monroe Street STE 507
Chicago, IL 60603 Chicago, IL 60603
Notification
Personal: Sent 1/4/19
Response: None as of the date of this report
Property Description
Legal Description: 1.82 acres out of the Thomas J Chambers Survey; 2.09 acres out of the Thomas J
Chambers Survey, Tract 277; and Forest Hills lots 1,2,3 Blk 2 and lots 3, 4College
Heights
Location: Corner of Ramsay Street and Clark Avenue
Acreage: 4.5 Acres PDD: Ord. #2011-05
Existing Zoning: MF-24
Existing Use: Multifamily Proposed Use: Multifamily
Preferred Scenario: Existing Neighborhood
CONA Neighborhood: Forest Hills Neighborhood 3
Commission
Sector:
Utility Capacity: Sufficient Floodplain: No
Surrounding Area
Zoning Existing Land Use Preferred Scenario
North of Property: MF-18, P Multifamily, Existing Neighborhood
Electric Substation
South of Property: MF-24 Multifamily Existing Neighborhood
East of Property: D,SF-6 Duplex, Single Existing Neighborhood
Family
West of Property: MU, MF-24, SF-6 Multifamily Existing Neighborhood
Staff Recommendation
Approval as X Approval with Conditions / Alternate Denial
Submitted
Staff recommends approval with the following conditions:
• The development shall not significantly vary from the site plan proposed.
• The development shall comply with all other relevant codes and ordinances including Building and Fire code
Staff: Matt Johnson Title : Planning Technician Date: 1/10/19
1
Reinstatement of 222 Ramsay Street
Nonconforming Rights
VR-19-01
History
The property is located in the MF-24 zoning district with a PDD overlay that allows a maximum of 30 units per
acre. Prior to the 2018 fire, the property consisted of a total of 128 units that contained 226 bedrooms, with a
density of 28 units per acre. The Applicant is requesting to reconstruct 60 multifamily units destroyed by an
arson fire, with a total of 266 bedrooms.
Multifamily, “MF” zoning districts, contain specific development standards that focus on compatibility with their
surrounding areas. This includes standards such as: Bringing buildings towards the street, parking behind the
buildings, and incorporating adequate pedestrian access and circulation.
The Applicant is proposing a new site plan that will ultimately bring the property into more conformance with
the Development Code. Please refer to the Planning Department analysis and the Applicant’s narrative for
additional details.
Relevant Land Development Codes
1.5.1.9(A)(4): Reconstruction of a nonconforming structure that has been destroyed
Chapter 9, Division 3: Multifamily Residential Design Standards
Chapter 7, Article 1: Parking
Chapter 7, Article 2: Landscaping and Screening
2
Reinstatement of 222 Ramsay Street
Nonconforming Rights
VR-19-01
3
Reinstatement of 222 Ramsay Street
Nonconforming Rights
VR-19-01
The proposed change in nonconforming status results in greater conformance with the Comprehensive Plan;
a. The request does not result into greater conformance with the Comp Plan. The Preferred Scenario Map
designation, “Existing Neighborhoods”, would not allow any new entitlement requests for multifamily without
first granting a request to amend the Preferred Scenario Map; however, the entitlements for multifamily
currently exist through the MF-24 zoning on the property.
The proposed change in nonconforming status results in greater conformance with this development code such
that the nonconforming use or structure can eventually come into full compliance with this development code;
b. The proposed site plan is in greater conformance with the Land Development Code.
Granting the application shall not result in greater harm to adjacent and neighboring land uses than the original
nonconformity;
d. The request will not result in greater harm than the original nonconformity. All new construction will be required
to meet the adopted Building and Fire Codes at time of building permitting.
4
FORGE CRAFT
ARCHITECTURE + DESIGN
608 West Monroe Street, Suite C
Austin, Texas 78704
512.872.6655
www.forgecraftarchitecture.com
TRANSFORMER
PAD
BLDG M
BUILDING L
16 UNITS DAMAGED
CLARK STREET
BUILDING 300
16 UNITS DAMAGED
BIM Server: bim2.forgecraft.local - BIMcloud Basic for ARCHICAD 21/SMGI Housing/SMGI Housing MF-24 42-60 ZBOA | Ver. 21.1802 | Wednesday, January 9, 2019 | 7:27 AM
BUILDING 500
28 UNITS DAMAGED
BLDG 100
BLDG 700
BLDG 200
EXISTING OFFICE
CLUBHOUSE
A: 2,808 sq ft
BLDG 600
10' SETBACK +
STREET EASEMENT
5' SIDEWALK SETBACK
PROPERTY LINE
EXISTING SITE
RAMSAY STREET AREA OF WORK
ISSUE:
PLAN
NORTH FEASIBILITY 11 - ZBOA
SITE PLAN - INITIAL CONDITIONS EXHIBITS
1 SCALE: 1" = 30'
DATE:
01/17/2019
PROJECT NUMBER:
2018-0020
SHEET TITLE:
SHEET:
A0.00
©2018 (your company)
Units/ Parking Parking FORGE CRAFT
Units Bedrooms SF Parking Acre Requirements Per Code ARCHITECTURE + DESIGN
608 West Monroe Street, Suite C
Prior to Fire This Site Had 128 226 91,522 222 28 233.10 93.6% Austin, Texas 78704
512.872.6655
www.forgecraftarchitecture.com
Rebuild Proposal 128 266 111,418 263 28 279.30 94.2% Scott Ginder - Texas Architect
Unchanged Buildings Registration # 21234
--
Building 700 28 56 22,064 This document is incomplete and
MANDALAY STREET may not be used for regulatory
Building 100 28 56 22,064 approval, permitting or
construction.
Building M 4 8 3,160
TRANSIT
STOP
24'-0"
TRANSFORMER
1
BIKE C C C C C C
Building 200 4 4 2,260
2
Rebuild New Buildings
LANDSCAPE LANDSCAPE
3
SCREENING SCREENING
24'-0"
28
Building N1 39 93 39,360
4
9
5
BLDG M
Building N2 21 45 20,250 C C C C C C
7
8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
8
C C C C C C
9
BIKE RACK
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
26'-0"
28
LANDSCAPE
150'-0" SCREENING
30'-0"
C C C C C C
21'-11 1/2" 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
26'-5 3/4"
24'-7/8"
1
BLDG N1
18
C
2
1
3BR
3BR
C
A: 1,344 sf
2
A: 1,216 sf
CLARK STREET
13
C
C C C C C C
3
4
4
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
C
STAIR
5
BIM Server: bim2.forgecraft.local - BIMcloud Basic for ARCHICAD 21/SMGI Housing/SMGI Housing MF-24 42-60 ZBOA | Ver. 21.1802 | Wednesday, January 9, 2019 | 7:27 AM
BLDG N2
C
6
6
3BR
3BR
A: 1,140 sf
3BR
A: 1,140 sf
3BR
A: 1,140 sf
3BR
A: 1,140 sf
26'-0" A: 1,184 sf
CROSSING
2BR
A: 840 sf
BLDG 100
1
EXT WALKWAY
BLDG 700
2
COVERED
30 STAIR STAIR
BIKE
2BR
3
A: 864 sf
4
25
A: 840 sf
1BR
14 A: 570 sf
5
1BR
A: 763 sf 2BR
6
A: 864 sf
1BR
A: 704 sf
7
2BR
A: 840 sf
8
26'-0" 2BR
9
A: 864 sf
150'-0"
10
1
2BR
A: 840 sf
11
2
C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C BLDG 200 CLUBHOUSE BLDG 600
2BR
12
3
8 STAIR
A: 864 sf
13
4
SCOPE OF WORK
48 34 REV DATE DESCRIPTION
14
5
PARKING RESTRIPING ONLY
15
6
3BR
A: 1,216 sf
LANDSCAPE 3BR
16
10' SETBACK +
A: 1,344 sf
7
SCREENING
17
8
5' SIDEWALK SETBACK
PROPERTY LINE CROSSING
EXISTING SITE
RAMSAY STREET AREA OF WORK
A0.11
©2018 (your company)
BLDG N2 EXST BLDG
3-STORY TO REMAIN
EXST BLDG BLDG N1
21-UNITS
TO REMAIN 3-STORY
39-UNITS
BLDG N2
3-STORY FORGE CRAFT
ARCHITECTURE + DESIGN
21-UNITS 608 West Monroe Street, Suite C
Austin, Texas 78704
512.872.6655
www.forgecraftarchitecture.com
EXISTING
LANDSCAPE CLUBHOUSE Scott Ginder - Texas Architect
CLUBHOUSE Registration # 21234
SCREENING
--
This document is incomplete and
may not be used for regulatory
approval, permitting or
LANDSCAPE BLDG N1 construction.
CLUBHOUSE
SCREENING 3-STORY
39-UNITS
BLDG N2
3-STORY
21-UNITS
VIEW OF 3-STORY
39-UNIT BUILDING
FROM SW CORNER EXPANDED
PARKING
BLDG N1
3-STORY
39-UNITS
ISSUE:
FEASIBILITY 11 - ZBOA
EXPANDED EXHIBITS
DATE:
PARKING
01/17/2019
PROJECT NUMBER:
2018-0020
SHEET TITLE:
A0.13
60 VIEW FROM NW 60 VIEW FROM SOUTH
urban LANDSCAPES
construction.
ISSUE:
FEASIBILITY 11 - ZBOA
EXHIBITS
DATE:
02/18/2018
PROJECT NUMBER:
2018-0020
LANDSCAPE
PRECEDENTS
SHEET:
A0.22
©2018 (your company)
San Marcos Green Investors LLC - Request to the San Marcos
Zoning Board of Adjustments and Appeals.
San Marcos Green Investors LLC, the fee simple owner of Iconic Village Apartments (222
Ramsay Street) and Vintage Pads Apartments (1000 N LBJ Drive), is proposing to reconstruct the
portion of Iconic Village and Vintage Pads that were destroyed by arson fire on July 20th, 2018.
In order to reconstruct the 60 apartment units that were destroyed by the fire, it is necessary to
request that the Zoning Board of Adjustments and Appeals (ZBOA) authorize the reinstatement
of certain non-conforming aspects of the properties that were in effect prior to the fire, a
summary of which can be found below:
• Permit the reconstruction of a project that exceeds the base zoning density of 24 units
per acre. The proposed project will involve the reconstruction the 60 units destroyed,
resulting in a total density of 28 units per acre, which is the density that was in-place
prior to the fire. The PDD approved in 2012 recognized an existing density of 28 units
per acre and provided for the construction of additional units that would bring the
density to 30 units per acre (additional units never constructed).
• Permit the reconstruction and restriping of the non-conforming parking area. The
project was previously parked at approximately 93% of the number of spaces currently
required for multi-family development. In addition, the parking area did not reflect
compliance with the parking lot design and landscaping standards found in Section 7 of
the current Code. The proposed project will reconstruct the parking area with263
parking spaces, which is approximately 94% of the 276 parking spaces that would be
required by the current code for the proposed site (a slightly improved percentage) and
would more closely conform to current parking design standards.
• Permit the reconstruction of the units reflecting improved, but not full, compliance
with the current multi-family design standards. The proposed project will reflect
substantial compliance with the architectural and building placement requirements of
the new code, including: building placement, street frontages, and specific architectural
requirements. Slight deviations to certain standards, such as street frontage on
Mandalay Street, will be necessary to provide for the reconstruction of the units within
the site limitations and to maintain the existing parking area.
• Permit other minor areas of non-conformity to allow for the reconstruction indicated
on the attached conceptual plan.
Below is a summary of the ways in which the newly constructed buildings, as well as the
remaining buildings that were un-harmed by the fire, will comply with, or be brought into
greater compliance with, the current building code:
• The construction of all new units / buildings will fully comply with the current building
and fire safety codes of the City of San Marcos.
• The construction of all new units / buildings will substantially comply with the current
multi-family design standards codes of the City of San Marcos.
• Existing buildings in the plan will be refitted with interconnected smoke alarm systems,
fire extinguishers in each apartment unit, and building alterations to slow down the
spread of fire to improve their fire safety to the bring the structures into greater
conformance with current Codes. The ownership is also committed to working with the
Fire Marshall and other City staff to explore additional retrofit options.
• New sidewalks and other pedestrian facilities will be included to improve pedestrian and
bicycle access on and adjacent to the property. The new construction will include
improved and secure bicycle storage facilities.
• Storm water quality and control facilities will be incorporated into the reconstruction
project. Overall impervious cover will be reduced below current percentages.
• The new construction and retrofitting of the existing units will result in safer apartments
and an improved urban landscape for the varied and diverse residents of the complex.
o The project will reflect improved and greater conformance to the current
standards of the San Marcos Development Code. The ownership of the project
has expressed and demonstrated a willingness to work with the City to move
substantially toward full compliance with the new construction and to retrofit
the existing buildings to bring their fire safety above and beyond what is
required code.
• The request will not cause greater harm to the surrounding land uses.
Parking
Units/ Parking Per
Units Bedrooms SF Parking Acre Requirements Code
Prior to Fire This Site Had 128 226 91,522 222 28.00 233.10 93.6%
CONTACT INFORMATION
Applicant’s Name Matt Goebel Property Owner San Marcos Green Investors, LLC
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST
Non-conforming use Non-conforming structure
_______________________________________________________________________________________
AUTHORIZATION
I certify that the information on this application is complete and accurate. I understand the fees and the process
for this application. I understand my responsibility, as the applicant, to be present at meetings regarding this
request.
Submittal of this digital Application shall constitute as acknowledgement and authorization to process
this request.
Planning & Development Services • 630 East Hopkins • San Marcos, Texas 78666 • 512-393-8230
CHECKLIST FOR CHANGE IN NONCONFORMING STATUS
APPLICATION
**San Marcos Development Code Section 2.3.1.1(C): “Every application accepted by the responsible official
for filing shall be subject to a determination of completeness…the responsible official is not required to
review an application unless it is complete…”
Planning & Development Services • 630 East Hopkins • San Marcos, Texas 78666 • 512-393-8230
William M Bennett
222 Ramsay Street
Ed Theriot
Change in Nonconforming Status
12-4-18
William M Bennett
It shall
be the responsibility of the applicant to periodically check sign locations to verify that the signs remain
in place had have not been vandalized or removed. The applicant shall immediately notify the
responsible official of any missing or defective signs. It is unlawful for a person to alter any notification
sign, or to remove it while the case is pending; however, any removal or alteration that is beyond the
control of the applicant shall not constitute a failure to meet notification requirements.
If, for any reason, more than one notice is required to be mailed it may be
at the expense of the applicant. The renotification fee shall be $88 plus a $12 technology fee.
I have read the above statements and agree to the required public notification, as required, based on the attached
application. The City’s Planning and Development Services Department staff has my permission to place signs, as
required, on the property and I will notify City staff if the sign(s) is/are damaged, moved or removed. I understand the
process of notification and public hearing and hereby submit the attached application for review by the City.
12-4-18
William M Bennett
2019 Meetings
HPC Complete Application
Meeting Date Deadline*
January 3 Dec. 5, 2018
February 7 January 9
March 7 February 6
April 4 March 6
May 2 April 3
June 6 May 8
July 11 June 12
August 1 July 3
September 5 August 7
October 3 September 4
November 7 October 9
December 5 November 6
ZBOA Complete Application
Meeting Date Deadline*
January 17 Dec. 5, 2018
February 21 January 9
March 21 February 6
April 18 March 6
May 16 April 3
June 20 May 8
July 18 June 5
August 15 July 3
September 19 August 7
October 17 September 4
November 21 October 9
December 19 November 6
* San Marcos Development Code Section 2.3.1.1(c): “Every application accepted . . . shall be subject to a determination
of completeness . . . the responsible official is not required to review an application unless it is complete.”
Applications must be deemed complete by the Planning and Development Services Department by the deadline to be
considered at the corresponding meeting.