Sie sind auf Seite 1von 2

Republic v Jabson

DOCTRINE: That land has been removed from the scope of the Regalian Doctrine
and reclassified as part of the public domain's alienable and disposable portion
cannot be assumed or implied.

2 lots in Barrio San Jose and Bariio Bagong Katipunnan

Jabson Family owned land since 1909 – Respondents acquired lots via inheritance
and purchase from predecessor in interest
1978, 1st Filing: denied due to failure to comply with reco of land registration
commission to include complete names and addressed of lessees

2nd Filing: Siblings lakambini, paraluman, tala and magpuri, filed for registration of
title before RTC in Pasig

RTC: ruled in favor of jabson, Jabson purchased and possessed land for more than
30 years OCEAN in concept of owner, title never disputed by oithers, Jabsons proved
and established their rights over properties

CA: set aside RTC cdecision,. The appellate court noted that the rule on confirmation
of an imperfect title grounded on adverse possession does not apply unless and until
the subject land has been released in an official proclamation to that effect so that it
may form part of the disposable lands of the public domain. To this end, the
applicant must secure a certification from the Government that the land applied for
is in fact alienable and disposable.

No evidence presented by jabson showing that land was classified as alienable and
disposable land of public domain. Mere photocopy of Community Environment and
Natural Resources Office (CENRO) Certification dated May 14 1998 presented. No
party indentified such do.

MR by jbason – Granted by CA, they established adverse possiesion thru exercising

acts of ownership (construction of houses and leasing to 3rd parties), possession
since 1944



NO. Jabson failed to present during trial evidence estbalishing properties alienable
and disposable nature. Evidence presented in 1998 was mere photocopy not offered
in trial and only formed part of record at instance of oppositor not of Jabson. DENR
certification offered during MR - not offered in evidence, mere afterthought.
Only president may classifiy lands of public domain into alienable and disposable. C
Denr certification not sufficient to prove lands alienable nature.

The general rule prevailing over claims of land is the Regalian Doctrine, which, as
enshrined in the 1987 Constitution, declares that the State owns all .lands of the
public domain.30 In other words, land that has not been acquired from the
government, either by purchase, grant, or any other mode recognized by law,
belongs to the State as part of the public domain.


It is clear from the above-cited provisions that any applicant for registration of title
to land derived through a public grant must sufficiently establish three things: (a)
the subject land's alienable and disposable nature; (b) his or her predecessors'
adverse possession thereof, and ( c) the reckoning date from which such adverse
possession was under a bona fide claim of ownership, that is, since June 12, 1945 or