Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
The non-inclusion of a necessary party does not prevent the court from proceeding in the action,
and the judgment rendered therein shall be without prejudice to the rights of such necessary
party.
section 10. Unwilling co-plaintiff. – If the consent of nay party who should be joined as plaintiff
can not be obtained, he may be made a defendant and the reason therefor shall be stated in the
complaint.
Section 11. Misjoinder and non-joinder of parties. – Neither misjoinder or non-joinder of parties
is ground for dismissal of an action. Parties may be dropped or added by order of the court on
motion of any party or on its own initiative at any stage of the action and on such terms as are
just. Any claim against a misjoined party may be severed and proceeded with separately.
Section 12. Class suit. – When the subject matter of the controversy is one of common or general
interest to many persons so numerous that it is impracticable to join all as parties, a number of
them which the court finds to be sufficiently numerous and representative as to fully protect the
interest of all concerned may sue or defend for the benefit of all. Any party in interest shall have
the right to intervene to protect his individual interest.
Section 13. Alternative defendants. – Where the plaintiff is uncertain against who of several
persons he is entitled to relief, he may join any or all of them as defendants in the alternative,
although a right to relief against one may be inconsistent with a right of relief against the other.
Section 14. Unknown identity or name of defendant. – Whenever the identity or name of a
defendant is unknown, he may be sued as the unknown owner, heir, devisee, or by such other
designation as the case may require; when his identity or true name is discovered, the pleading
must be amended accordingly.
Section 15. Entity without juridical personality as defendant. – When two or more persons not
organized as an entity with juridical personality enter into a transaction, they may be sued under
the name by which they are generally or commonly known.
In the answer of such defendant the names and addresses or persons composing said entity must
all be revealed.
Section 16. Death of party, duty of counsel. – Whenever a party to a pending action dies, and
the claim is not thereby extinguished, it shall be the duty of his counsel to inform the court within
thirty (3) days after such death of the fact thereof, and to give the name and address of his legal
representative or representatives. Failure of counsel to comply with this duty shall be a ground
for disciplinary action.
The heirs of the deceased may be allowed to be substituted for the deceased, without requiring
the appointment of an executor or administrator and the court may appoint a guardian ad litem
for the minor heirs.
The court shall forthwith order said legal representative or representatives to appear and be
substituted within a period of thirty (30) days from notice.
If no legal representative is named by the counsel for the deceased party, or if the one s named
shall fail to appear within the specified period, the court may order the opposing party within a
specified time, to procure the appointment of an executor or administrator for the estate of the
deceased and the latter shall immediately appear for and on behalf of the deceased. The court
charges in procuring such appointment, if defrayed by the opposing party, may be recovered as
costs.
Section 17. Death or separation of a party who is a public officer. – When a public officer is a
party in an action in his official capacity and during its pendency dies, resigns, or otherwise
ceased to hold office, the action may be continued and maintained by or against his successor if,
within thirty (30) days after the successor takes office or such time as may be granted by the
court, it is satisfactorily shown to the court by any party that there is a substantial need for
continuing or maintaining it and that the successor adopts or continues or threatens to adopt or
continue the action of his predecessor. Before a substitution is made, the party or officer to be
affected, unless expressly assenting thereto, shall be given reasonable notice of the application
therefor and accorded an opportunity to be heard.
Section 18. Incompetency or incapacity. – If a party becomes incompetent or incapacitated, the
court, upon motion with notice, may allow the action to be continued by or against the
incompetent or incapacitated person assisted by his legal guardian or guardian ad litem.
Section 19. Transfer of interest. – In case of any transfer of interest, the actin may be continued
by or against the original party, unless the court upon motion directs the person to whom the
interest is transferred to be substituted in the action or joined with the original party.
Section 20. Action on contractual money claims. – When the action is for recovery of money
arising from contract, express or implied , and the defendant dies before entry of final judgment
in the court in which the action was pending at the time of such death, it shall not be dismissed
but shall instead be allowed to continue until entry or final judgment. A favorable judgment
obtained by the plaintiff therein shall be enforced in the manner especially provided in these
Rules for prosecuting claims against the estate of a deceased person.
Section 21. Indigent party. – A party may be authorized to litigate his action, claim or defense as
an indigent if the court, upon an ex parte application and hearing, is satisfied that the party is
one who has no money or property sufficient and available for food, shelter and basic necessities
for himself and his family.
Such authority shall include an exemption from payment of docket and other lawful fees, and of
transcripts of stenographic notes which the court may order to be furnished him The amount of
the docket and other lawful fees which the indigent was exempted from paying shall be alien on
any judgment rendered in the case favorable to the indigent, unless the court otherwise provides.
Any adverse party may contest the grant of such authority at any time before judgment is
rendered by the trial court. If the court should determine after hearing that the party declared as
an indigent is in fact a person with sufficient income or property, the proper docket and other
lawful fees shall be assessed and collected by the clerk of court. If payment is not made within
the time fixed by the court, execution shall issue or the payment thereof; without prejudice to
such other sanctions as the court may impose.
Section 22. Notice to the Solicitor General. – In any action involving the validity of any treaty,
law, ordinance, executive, order, presidential decree, rules or regulations, the court in its
discretion, may require the appearance of the Solicitor General who may be heard in person or
through a representative duly designated by him.
Filipinas Industrial Corp. v. Sn. Diego, 23 SCRA 706 (’68)
FACTS: Pastor Ago filed a complaint vs. petitioner in his name as atty. in fact of Laiz. Petitioner
filed a MTD on the ground that action was not brought in the name of the real party in interest.
HELD: Under the RoC, every action must be brought in the name of the real party in interest.
This provision is mandatory. The real party in interest is the party who would be benefited or
injured by the judgment or is the party entitled to the avails of the suit. An atty.-in-fact is NOT a
real party in interest; there is no law permitting an action to be brought by an atty.-in-fact &
hence, an action brought by him cannot be maintained. Even if the principal authorizes his agent
to commence actions in a ct. for & in behalf of the principal, such action must still be filed in
the name of the principal who is the real party in interest.
FILIPINAS: Case dismissed due to lack of cause of action; not due to non-joinder of parties. Atty-
in-fact can’t represent principal in the case since atty-in-fact was not the one injured
REPRESENTATIVE PARTIES: Not the real parties but are allowed by law or the Rules to sue on
behalf of the principal
Plaintiffs sue in 2 capacities: 1) themselves; 2) on behalf of the parties of the class or those with
an interest in the subject matter of the suit but are too numerous to be brought in the
suit (OPOSA V FACTORAN)
L: What if defendant is a volleyball player of a sportsfest and the plaintiff wants to sue all
participants of the sportsfest?
A: Identify all and do not apply sec. 15 since identifiable and also a volleyball team is not a
proper juridical entity.
JOINDER OF PARTIES (Sec. 6) not necessary that parties be indispensable or necessary parties
a. Necessary or proper party (Sec. 8) Case may proceed, only plaintiff may not be able to obtain
complete relief
Aranico-Rabino v. Aquino, 80 SCRA 254 (’77)
Facts: Petitioners filed a complaint for recovery of a lot w/c priv. resp. claims to be owned by
one Meimban & his successors-in-interest. The ct. ordered the complaint be amended to include
all the heirs of the late Meimban in order that there will be a final adjudication of the rights of
the parties in the case. Counsel for petners. refused.
Held: The heirs of Meimban are indispensable parties who should be included in the complaint in
order that there will be a final adjudication of the rights of the parties in their case.
ARANICO: Dismissal not due to failure to implead a party but due to contumacious refusal to
comply with the order of the court; misjoiner or non-joinder is not basis for the dismissal of case
Laperal Dev. Co. v. CA, 223 SCRA 261 (’93)
Facts: Counsel sought recovery of atty.’s fees fr. Sunbeams Foods referred to in the complaint as
“Mr. Laperal’s Corporation” but w/c was not joined by name as a party-defendant.
Held: Sunbeams should have been joined as a party-deft. in order that the judgment of the lower
ct. could legally affect it. But even if it was not impleaded, the ct. could still validly proceed w/
the case bec. Sunbeams was not an indispensable party but only a proper party. A proper party is
one w/c ought to be a party if complete relief is to be accorded as between those already
parties. A party is indispensable if no final determination can be had of an action unless it is
joined either as plff. or deft.
FILIPINAS INDUSTRIAL – Indispensable
LAPERAL DEVT V CA – Proper party. Sunbeam only a necessary party and therefore not a party to
the compromise agreement. But atty can’t collect atty’s fees since there was a udicial admission
as to waiver of all claims
BARFEL: disclosure, not existence of 2nd mortgage is the issue. The 2nd mortgagee is liable to
plaintiff in Contract to Purchase. Not a proper party. Mortgages follow property wherever it
goes, thus, PISO can’t become a party since there is no cause of action against it.
b. Indispensable (Sec. 7) If not impleaded, case cannot proceed since there can be no final
determination.
Petitioner-minors can, for themselves, for others of their generation, & for the succeeding
generation, file a class suit. Their personality to sue in behalf of succeeding generations can only
be based on the concept of intergenerational responsibility insofar as the right to a balanced &
healthful ecology is concerned. Every generation has a responsibility to preserve the rhythm &
harmony for the full enjoyment of a balanced & healthful ecology. The minor’s assertion of their
right to a sound environment constitutes, at the same time, the performance of their obligation to
ensure the protection of that right for the generations to come.
OPOSA V FACTORAN. Are unborn children w/ capacity to be party to a suit? No, but purposes of
this class suit, SC used intergenerational responsibility argument. Limit Consti Art 11 sec. 16 to
ecological suits. L’s note: no legal basis, natural law only. Also, other Art. 11 provisions
hortatory and not basis for a class action suit. Not all taxpayers’ suits are class suits
A public official may sometimes be held in his personal or private capacity if he acts in bad faith
or beyond his authority or jurisdiction. In this case, however, the acts were performed as part of
official duties w/o malice, gross negligence or bad faith. Thus, no recovery may be had vs. them
in their private capacity as well.
LECTURE ON PARTIES: Remedies available for certain situations. L at his most practical.
Eg. Co-owner sues for partition of property owned in common; thus, he must implead all co-
owners in order that final determination might be made. What if P sues only 1 co-
owner? (ARANICO-RABINO)
Plan B) If court refuses to implead the other co-owners, file MTD for lack of due process for
failure to implead an indispensable party
Plan C) Go to CA for certiorari on grounds of grave abuse of discretion on part of trial court judge
for refusing to iplead indispensable party w/o whom there can be no final determination of the
case.
Permissive joinder of parties: not necessarily imply that parties indispensable or necessary
Counsel for D: Rule 3 sec. 18 file motion to bring guardian of insane party brought in as a
representative. If insane > 18 years old, ask for guardian ad litem
1. Party dies. His counsel duty bound to inform court of such fact and of his legal representative
If there is no rep, court will order Counsel for D to procure appointment of executor or
administrator
NOTE: Personal action: remedy filed where cause of action involves personal property or
right. Subject matter involves personal property and others. Not a real action which involves
title to or possession of real property. Important for proper venue.