Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
NEPAL
To conclude, we must say that the impressive growth of print media in
Nepal in the 1990s does not necessarily mean that it has served the cause
of democracy in a thoroughly satisfactory manner. Print media in Nepal
at
the turn of the century looks impressive when compared to its status in
1990 but it also suffers from several institutional weaknesses discussed
earlier. As a result, Nepali print media can not do ground-breaking
investigative reporting that would rock the power equations of Nepali
society. In other words, Nepali print media is a partial democratizing
force
in Nepal but at the same time, it shares the privileges of power
associated
with the three wings of the state and the Nepali financial-business world.
Thus we can conclude that while Nepali print media has contributed
toward the reduction of the ruthlessness of our political and financial
bosses, it has a long way to go before it can truly speak for the set of
multiply disenfranchised Nepalis. Hence, painstaking advocacy at all
levels—further research on the structural and institutional constraints
discussed above and policies and programs to overcome them—will be
necessary for years to come if we want to bring about some significant
changes. All those who have a stake in improving media's effectiveness as
a force for democracy in Nepal must take this task seriously.
Major Challenges for Press Freedom and Media
Development in South Asia
1) Lack of political freedom and democratic norms
2) Political instability
3) Religious domination
4) Low educational status
5) Social discriminations
6) Economic constraints
7) Geographical complications
8) Technological backwardness
9) Weakness in policy implementation
10)Lack of professionalism
11) Growing violence against media and media persons
PRESS FREEDOM SITUATION IN ASIA
- Freedom House, based in New York
- a press freedom institution recognized by the UN
- evaluates press freedom situation all over the world since 1979 in five year
interval
- evaluation based on Universal Declaration of Human Rights Art.19
- 5 major criteria for evaluation press freedom in each country:
a) legal provisions
b)government ownership in media
c)political domination
d)economic pressure on news
e)violence against media and media professionals
- three stander of press freedom : Free, Partly Free and Not Free
- according to 2005 report 17% global population are in free media society,
38% in partly free society and 45% are in not free media society
- In Asian continent:
Free- Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, Mauritius
Partly Free – India, Sri Lanka, Thailand, Philippines, Indonesia, Mongolia
Not Free – China, Russia, former soviet states, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal,
Bhutan, Maldives, Afghanistan, Myanmar, Laos, Cambodia, Vietnam,
Malaysia, Brunei, Singapore, Iran, Iraq, North Korea, Arabian nations .
According to International Press Institute (IPI) based in Vienna –
- From the beginning of the new millennium (2001 – 2008) total 575 media
persons have been killed
- highest number of the victims – 100 in 2006, lowest 54 in 2002
- According to IPI Report, total 66 media persons were killed around the
world in 2008
- Highest killing - Iraq - 14
Second - Pakistan- 6
Third - India, Philippines and Mexico - 5 each
Presented by
Faisal Siddique
Submitted to