← Vitrified Forts – Dun and Dusted

The Wroxeter Chronicles: Broken Red Sandstone →

The Roman Time Line and the Heinsohn Horizon

Posted on May 12, 2016by malagabay

Q-Mag.org have published a new paper by Gunnar Heinsohn that reviews the
stratigraphy for seven cities:
Aachen, Kalisz, Rome, Athens, Byzantium, Jerusalem, and Samarra.
http://www.q-mag.org/wrecked-metropolises-of-the-1st-millennium-a-
comparison.html
The stratigraphy of Aachen, for example, illustrates Gunnar Heinsohn’s central theme
that the mainstream has mistakenly populated 700 phantom years [in the 1st
millennium] withRoman Architecture and Artefacts from Antiquity i.e. 1st – 3rd
centuries.
Wrecked Metropoles of The 1st Millennium CE: A Comparison
Gunnar Heinsohn – 1 May 2016
http://www.q-mag.org/_iserv/dlfiles/dl.php?ddl=gunnar-wrecked-metropoles-1st-
millennium-comparison-heinsohn-01-may-2016-1.pdf
When Roman Architecture and Artefacts are correctly allocated to Antiquity it’s easier
to understand the full implications of Gunnar Heinsohn’s perspective.
Heinsohn’s interpretation of the 1st millennium is beyond the pale for academia because
it undermines so many of their carefully crafted creations.
However, for open minded individuals, Gunnar Heinsohn provides an invaluable
opportunity to discover whether Stratigraphy is Mightier than the Pen.
Therefore, for open minded individuals, here is a basic reality check.
The reality check involves establishing a Roman Empire Time Line of events.
The first three elements in the Roman Empire Time Line are the fundamental academic
anchors used to bind together the Roman Empire, the Church of Rome and Modern
Times into a unified historical narrative.
Octavian’s power was then unassailable and in 27 BC the Roman Senate formally
granted him overarching power and the new title Augustus, effectively marking the
end of the Roman Republic.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_Empire
There is no year zero in this scheme, so the year AD 1 immediately follows the year 1
BC. This dating system was devised in 525, but was not widely used until after 800.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anno_Domini
Theodosius I, the last emperor to rule over both East and West, died in 395
AD after making Christianity the official religion of the empire.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_Empire
The next three elements in the Roman Empire Time Line come from the comical parade
of Four, Five and Six Emperors used to bind together a fragmenting Roman Empire.
The Year of the Four Emperors…
…
Between June of 68 and December of 69, Rome witnessed the successive rise and fall
of Galba, Otho, and Vitellius until the final accession of Vespasian, first of the Imperial
Flavian dynasty, in July 69.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Year_of_the_Four_Emperors
The Year of the Five Emperors refers to the year 193 AD, in which there were five
claimants for the title of Roman Emperor.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Year_of_the_Five_Emperors
The Year of the Six Emperors refers to the year 238 AD, during which six people
were recognised as emperors of Rome.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Year_of_the_Six_Emperors
The completed Roman Empire Time Line contains six textbook dates that define the
mainstream Roman Empire narrative: 27 BC, 1 AD, 68 AD, 193 AD, 238 AD and 395 AD.
The Roman Empire Time Line is spliced onto the Old Japanese Cedar chronology so
that the Crisis of the Third Century starts before the Heinsohn Horizon.
The Crisis of the Third Century, also known as Military Anarchy or the Imperial
Crisis, (AD 235–284) was a period in which the Roman Empire nearly collapsed
under the combined pressures of invasion, civil war, plague, and economic depression.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crisis_of_the_Third_Century
Even to my jaundiced eye the close alignment of six textbook dates spanning
the Heinsohn Horizon is a startling result.
The alignment implies the Machiavellian Monks simply manufactured a false narrative
to establish authoritarian antecedents and distance themselves from natural disasters.
The Anno Domini dating system was devised in 525 by Dionysius Exiguus to
enumerate the years in his Easter table.
…
According to the Catholic Encyclopedia, popes continued to date documents according
to regnal years for some time, but usage of AD gradually became more
common in Roman Catholic countries from the 11th to the 14th centuries.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anno_Domini
The revised splicing also implies natural disasters were the underlying reasons for the
collapse in the Purity of Roman Coins and the disintegration of the Roman Empire.
There are other very interesting implications.

Firstly, it provides a revised interpretation of the Trepidation data that more accurately
reflects R. R. Newton’s view that the Earth-Moon system experienced “a ‘square wave’ in
the accelerations that lasted from about 700–1300”.

See: https://malagabay.wordpress.com/2015/05/07/trembling-stargazers/
Empirico-Statistical Analysis of Narrative Material and its Applications to Historical
Dating – Volume 1 – The Development of the Statistical Tools
A T Fomenko – Translated by O Efimov
Kluwer Academic Publishers – 1994 – The Netherlands
http://www.chronologia.org/en/es_analysis1/index.html
See: https://malagabay.wordpress.com/2015/11/14/heinsohn-and-the-eclipse-record/
Similarly, it closes [with a jolt] the mysterious gap in 1st millennium observations
of Axial Tilt that George Dodwell partially filled with Chinese observations.
See: https://malagabay.wordpress.com/2015/04/29/rock-around-the-clock/
Secondly, it provides a rationale for re-aligning Justinian’s Raging Bulls with the
formation of the Denver Middle Sand Unit.

See: https://malagabay.wordpress.com/2016/05/01/justinians-raging-bulls/
See: https://malagabay.wordpress.com/2016/04/29/denver-dust-bowl/
The re-alignment implies Samarra was eventually drowned in a sea of sand following
the final disintegration of one [or two] of Justinian’s Raging Bulls.
Wrecked Metropoles of The 1st Millennium CE: A Comparison
Gunnar Heinsohn – 1 May 2016
http://www.q-mag.org/_iserv/dlfiles/dl.php?ddl=gunnar-wrecked-metropoles-1st-
millennium-comparison-heinsohn-01-may-2016-1.pdf
Thirdly, it implies Stratigraphy is Mightier than the Pen.
Share this:

 Twitter

 Facebook1


Related

Friends, Romans, Countrymen...

In "Catastrophism"

Dendrochronology: Disastrous Data

In "Catastrophism"
 History: Stretching the Truth
In "Astrophysics"

Gallery | This entry was posted in Astrophysics, Atmospheric Science, Catastrophism, Gunnar
Heinsohn, History,Science, Uniformitarianism. Bookmark the permalink.

← Vitrified Forts – Dun and Dusted

The Wroxeter Chronicles: Broken Red Sandstone →
One Response to The Roman Time Line and the
Heinsohn Horizon
1. Pingback: The Wroxeter Chronicles: Broken Red Sandstone | MalagaBay

Leave a Reply