ROLL : 183040004 RESEARCH THEME : Road Air Pollution : Emission based modelling SELECTED PAPERS :
Sl. No. Paper Reason
1 Ahn, K., Rakha, H., Trani, A. and Van Aerde, 1. Used both light duty M. (2002). Estimating vehicle fuel vehicle and light duty consumption and emissions based on truck. instantaneous speed and acceleration 2. Use instantaneous speed levels. Journal of transportation and acceleration. engineering, 128(2), pp.182-190. 3. Also used microscopic doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733- model. 947X(2002)128:2(182)
2 Bandeira, J.M., Fontes, T., Pereira, S.R., 1. Using new technology
Fernandes, P., Khattak, A. and Coelho, M.C., (smart navigation (2014). Assessing the importance of vehicle technologies) for selection type for the implementation of eco-routing of eco-friendly route. systems. Transportation Research 2. Use intelligent road Procedia, 3, pp.800-809. pricing to control air doi:10.1016/j.trpro.2014.10.063 pollution. 3. Large data base is used. 3 Colberg, C.A., Tona, B., Stahel, W.A., 1. Used dynamometric test Meier, M. and Staehelin, J. (2005). measurement and engine Comparison of a road traffic emission model maps at different (HBEFA) with emissions derived from conditions. measurements in the Gubrist road tunnel, 2. Validation of result with Switzerland. Atmospheric two version of HBEFA. Environment, 39(26), pp.4703-4714. 3. Large size data collection doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.04.020 (12 year).
4 Ghose, M. K., Paul, R. and Banerjee, S. K. 1. Describe complexity
(2004). Assessment of the impacts of involves with Indian city vehicular emissions on urban air quality and context. its management in Indian context: The case 2. Headlight also effects of of Kolkata (Calcutta), Environmental air pollutant on human Science and Policy, 7(4), pp. 345–351. doi: health. 10.1016/j.envsci.2004.05.004. 3. Also did vulnerable analysis. 5 Hirschmann, K., Zallinger, M., Fellendorf, 1. Link microscopic traffic M. and Hausberger, S. (2010), September. A flow simulator VISSIM new method to calculate emissions with with instantaneous simulated traffic conditions. In Intelligent emission model PHEM. Transportation Systems (ITSC), 2010 13th 2. Both gasoline and diesel International IEEE Conference on(pp. 33- vehicles are used with 38). IEEE. doi:10.1109/ITSC.2010.5625030 different standards. 3. Used speed trajectories in evaluation. 6 Svenson, G. and Fjeld, D. (2016). The impact 1. Study effect of road of road geometry and surface roughness on geometry such as radius of fuel consumption of logging trucks, curvature, gradient and Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research. roughness on fuel Taylor & Francis, 31(5), pp. 526–536. doi: consumption and emission 10.1080/02827581.2015.1092574.
REJECTED PAPERS :
Sl. No. Paper Reason
1 Borge, R., de Miguel, I., de la Paz, D., 1. This paper compares two well- Lumbreras, J., Pérez, J. and known models COPERT-IV and Rodríguez, E., (2012). Comparison of HBEFA. road traffic emission models in 2. Similar type of methodology is Madrid (Spain). Atmospheric used in past papers also. Environment, 62, pp.461-471. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.08.073
2 Shu, Y. and Lam, N.S.(2011). Spatial 1. Mostly generalized idea is used.
disaggregation of carbon dioxide 2. The independent variable is not emissions from road traffic based on looking suitable to environment multiple linear regression pollution emission. model. Atmospheric environment, 45(3), pp.634-640. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.10.037
3 Briggs, D.J., Collins, S., Elliott, P., 1. Period of collection of data
Fischer, P., Kingham, S., Lebret, E., respect to other paper is small. Pryl, K., Van Reeuwijk, H., 2. Procedure adopted in this paper is Smallbone, K. and Van Der Veen, A., found in previous paper also. (1997). Mapping urban air pollution using GIS: a regression-based approach. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 11(7), pp.699-718. doi:10.1080/136588197242158
4 Mulholland, M. and Seinfeld, J.H., 1. Abstract is not clear what
1995. Inverse air pollution modelling procedure and what they get in of urban-scale carbon monoxide result. emissions. Atmospheric Environment, 29(4), pp.497-516. doi:10.1016/1352-2310(94)00245-G