Sedimentation Plots M

T
C  

3D Seismic

Seismic  and  Sequence  Stratigraphy  for  Oil  and  

MTC

Biostratigraphy BFF RMS Amplitude Maps

Gas  Exploration  and  Development  
Submarine
Canyon
White  Channel  

Roger  M.  Slatt  

University  of  Oklahoma    

Time Slices and Variance Cube Salt  

Belinda Ferrero-Hodgson
Stratigraphic Cross-section
     Who  am  I??????????????  
 
-­‐Name:         Roger  Slatt  
-­‐Education:       Ph.D.  1970,  University  of  Alaska  
-­‐University    Employment:     1970-­‐76:  Memorial  Univ.      
          Newfoundland,  Canada  
        1976-­‐78:  Arizona  State  Univ.  
        1992-­‐2000:  Colorado  School  of      
        Mines  
        2000-­‐pres.:    Univ.  of  Oklahoma  
-­‐Petroleum  Industry    
  Employment:     1978-­‐80:  ARCO  Research  
        1980-­‐83:    Cities  Service  Research  
        1983-­‐90:    ARCO  Research  
        1990-­‐92:    ARCO  International  

So,  up    there  on  that  outcrop    

you  can  clearly  see  the  MFS  
that  overlies  the  CS  that  is  part  
of  the  TST  overlying  the  TSE.  
Then  on  top  of  the  MFS,  you  
see  the  downlapping    HST.  
^Ž͙͙͘ŝĨŶŽŽŶĞŚĂƐĂŶLJ
questions,  we  can  move    on  to  
the  next  outcrop!!!!  
 Reservoir  Life  Cycle  and  
               Business  Value  
A  main  goal  of  reservoir  
characterization  
Exploration   Appraisal   Development   Maturity  

Maximize  Production  
Economically  
Maximize  
Accelerate   Recovery  
 Production   Economically  
Cash  Flow  

 Time  

Minimize   Defer  
Opex   Abandonment  
Minimize  
 Capex  
Optimized  Development   Traditional  Development  

The  time  aspect  of  reservoirs  

͞ƐƚŝŵĂƚĞĚhůƚŝŵĂƚĞZĞĐŽǀĞƌLJ͟  

The  time  aspect  of  reservoirs  

 E X P L O R AT I O N
‡ W H E R E IS T H E SA N D?
‡ W H AT IS T H E P O R OSI T Y?

‡ W H AT IS T H E V O L U M E?

‡ W H AT IS T H E T R A P T Y P E??

‡ IS T H E R E A D E Q U AT E SO U R C E R O C K &
M I G R AT I O N PAT H WAY?

‡ IS T H E R E G O O D SE A L?

‡ W H AT E C O N O M I C FA C T O RS
(I N F R AST R U C T U R E , E T C .) W I L L
A F F E C T PR O D U C T I O N?

People  issues  
 A PPR A ISA L & D E V E L O P M E N T
‡ H O W B I G IS T H E R ESE R V O I R?

‡ H O W W I L L T H IS R ESE R V O I R ST Y L E P E R F O R M?

‡ H O W W I D E LY M UST W E SPA C E O U R
E X P E NSI V E D E V E L O P M E N T W E L LS?

‡ SH O U L D W E D R I L L A V E R T I C A L , SL A N T, O R
H O R I Z O N TA L W E L L??

‡ H O W C A N W E FAST-T R A C K D E V E L O P M E N T O F T H IS
R ESE R V O I R?

‡ W H AT W E N T W R O N G?

People  issues  
The  Perfect  Reservoir  Analog  
Rooms  =       Reservoir  sands  
 
Floors  and  Ceilings  =     Reservoir  seals    
      (compartments)  
 
Walls  =    Sealing  faults/stratigraphic  pinchouts  
 
Ƶƚ͙͙͘͘EŽƚĂůůƌŽŽŵƐĂƌĞƚŚĞƐĂŵĞ͗  
    -­‐Offices  
    -­‐Dining  area  
    -­‐Rest  Rooms  (WC)  
    -­‐Conference  Rooms  
    -­‐Commercial  stores  
Seismic  reflection  does  not  image    
͚ƐƵďƐĞŝƐŵŝĐ͛ƐĐĂůĞĨĞĂƚƵƌĞƐ͙ďƵƚ͕  
Reservoir  performance  is  often  governed  by  features  that  are  often  
ďĞŶĞĂƚŚƐĞŝƐŵŝĐƌĞƐŽůƵƚŝŽŶŽƌĚĞƚĞĐƚŝŽŶ;͚ƐƵď-­‐ƐĞŝƐŵŝĐƐĐĂůĞ͟Ϳ  
 Integration  of:    
             Geology                              Geophysics              Petrophysics                                Res.  Engineering  

Structure   3D  Seismic   Conventional  logs   Well  tests  

     -­‐Faults      -­‐Inversion   Special  logs   Production  data  
     -­‐Folds      -­‐Attributes   Core  
     -­‐Fractures  
Stratigraphy  
     -­‐Litho  
     -­‐Sequence   Identify  surfaces  and  structure  
     -­‐Bio  
Geochemistry  
Infill  volumes    
Outcrops   With  strata  

Building  a  
geological  
model  for  field   Grid  and  
Input  numerical  
development     parameters  

(and  exploration)  
        Structure  
  Feature                      Seismic                        Sub-­‐seismic  
   
  Fault  
 
Fold  
  Oil  

Diapir   No  
  oil  

Fracture             Antonelli  et  al.,  1999,  AGU  Geophys.  

Monograph  113,  p.  7-­‐26.  Photo    
Provided  by  Peter  Eichhubl  
Exam  Question  1:  Interpret  the  structure  of  this  interval  below.  

c  
bff  
bff   mtc  

?  
?  
 Integration  of:    
             Geology                              Geophysics              Petrophysics                                Res.  Engineering  

Structure   3D  Seismic   Conventional  logs   Well  tests  

     -­‐Faults      -­‐Inversion   Special  logs   Production  data  
     -­‐Folds      -­‐Attributes   Core  
     -­‐Fractures  
Stratigraphy  
     -­‐Litho  
     -­‐Sequence   Identify  surfaces  and  structure  
     -­‐Bio  
Geochemistry  
Infill  volumes    
Outcrops   With  strata  

Building  a  
geological  
model  for  field   Grid  and  
Input  numerical  
development     parameters  

(and  exploration)  
 184  ms   160  ms  

Conventional  2D  and    

3D  seismic  for    
structure  and    
stratigraphy  
 
 Type  Seismic  Line  with  distribution  of  Seismic  Sequences    

Seismic  sequences  I  to  VIII  were  obtained  from  Escalante,  (2005)  which  had  age  control  in  the  area.      

14  
Fig.  9.  Strat-­‐slices  through  (a)  coherence,  
and  long  wavelength  (b)  most-­‐positive  and  
(c)  most-­‐negative  curvature  attribute  
volumes.  While  some  channels  are  seen  on  
the  coherence  display,  their  definition  and  
number  is  much  higher  on  the  curvature  
displays.  (Data  courtesy  of  Arcis  
Corporation.)    

Seismic  attributes:    Curvature  (+/-­‐)  

 (A)  Seisimc  profile.    (B)  Neural  Net  seismic  
A   Original  seismic  data   inversion  of  the  same  line  showing  the    
1200  ms   variation  in  acoustic  impedance  (colors).  This  
technique  is  a  very  valuable  means  of  
extracting  rock  property  information  from    
seismic  reflection  data  In  this  case,  the  inverted  
seismic  line  shows  some  reflectors  that  look  
U.  Barnett  Sh.   continuous  in  the  original  seismic  data,  but  
Forestburg  Ls   which  are  more  variable  and  discontinuous    in  
L.  Barnett  Sh.  
properties  on    the  inverted  line.    Figure  
provided  by  R.  Perez.  
Viola  Ls  
1400  ms  

B   Neural  Net  Seismic  inversion   Impedance  

((ft/s)*(g/cc))  
26952  

3D  Seismic  inversion  allows  calibration  of  

seismic  to  rock  types  and  their  continuity   44743  
 Integration  of:    
             Geology                              Geophysics              Petrophysics                                Res.  Engineering  

Structure   3D  Seismic   Conventional  logs   Well  tests  

     -­‐Faults      -­‐Inversion   Special  logs   Production  data  
     -­‐Folds      -­‐Attributes   Core  
     -­‐Fractures  
Stratigraphy  
     -­‐Litho  
     -­‐Sequence   Identify  surfaces  and  structure  
     -­‐Bio  
Geochemistry  
Infill  volumes    
Outcrops   With  strata  

Building  a  
geological  
model  for  field   Grid  and  
Input  numerical  
development     parameters  

(and  exploration)  
 Four  basic  Lithofacies  comprising  deepwater  stratigraphic  sequence  

Sheet  ss.   Channel  ss.  

Distal  overbank   Proximal  levee/    
shale   Overbank  shale  

UniformSandstone   Heterogenous   Organic-­‐rich   Organic-­‐poor  

shale  (OR-­‐sh)   shale  (OP-­‐Sh)  
Lithofacies  (US)   Sandstone  
Lithofacies    (HS)  
No.  core  plugs      60                  83                      5                                          7  
Por.(%)              28.1(+/-­‐1)                  19.4  (+/-­‐0.2)                14.7                                18.9  
K(md)           153  (+/1<10)            26  (+/-­‐>100)      0.001                                    0.085    
Av.  Bed  Thick.(m)          1.03                      0.76  
 Core  Plug  
Por.        Perm.        Bulk.  Den.    Vp                Vs            Vp/Vs      AI  
Measurements   (%)          (md)        (gm/cc)    (m/sec)                                  
             (gm/cc)(m/sec)  

Heterogenous    
29.0      292      1.92        2129      1206    1.77      4087  
Sandstones  (HS)                                                              

Uniform      29.5      415      1.91        1964      1156      1.70    3747    

Sandstones(US)   3

= US

Log10Permeability (md)
2

= HS
Org.  Poor  Shale   18.9    0.085    2.69      3514      1823      1.94      9444   1 Org.P.Sh
Org.R.Sh
0

y = -0.0008x + 5.6038
R2 = 0.9672
-1

Org.  Rich  Shale   14.7    0.001    2.67      3550      1853      1.95      9485   -2

-3
3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000 11000

Core-derived acoustic impedance [(gm/cc)(m/sec)]

3 35

= US
= US = HS
Log10Permeability (md)

2 30

= HS Org.P.Sh

Porosity (%)
1 Org.P.Sh 25
Org.R.Sh
Org.R.Sh y = -0.0022x + 37.876
2
R = 0.9139
0 20

y = -0.0008x + 5.6038
R2 = 0.9672
-1
15

-2
10
3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000 11000

-3
Core-derived acoustic impedance [(gm/cc)(m/sec)]
3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000 11000

Core-derived acoustic impedance [(gm/cc)(m/sec)]

35

= US
30 = HS
Acoustic  impedance  =  (rock  density)  X  (rock  P-­‐wave  velocity)  
Org.P.Sh
Porosity (%)

25
Org.R.Sh
y = -0.0022x + 37.876
2
R = 0.9139
20
Core/cuttings  data   ͻ Porosity,  Permeability,  
Water  Saturation  
ͻ Elevation  
ͻ Fluids  
ͻ Rocks  
ͻ Environment  
 
ʹ Make  Facies  log  based  on  
the  core  data  
ʹ Poro,  Perm,  SW  in  a  table  
(in  Depth)  
 Shown  are  capillary    
Pressure  curves  for  four  rocks,  A,B,C,  
And  D.    List  them  below  in  order  
KĨ͞ďĞƐƚ͟ƚŽ͞ǁŽƌƐƚ͟ƌĞƐĞƌǀŽŝƌ͕ǁŝƚŚ  
Best  on  top  and  worst  on  bottom.  
 
 
Best  
 
 
 
 
 
 
Worst  

Capillary pressure curves of four samples, A-D. The horizontal axis is nonwetting phase (Hg) saturation. The vertical axis shows the primary
measurement, Hg-injection pressure (
 Integration  of:    
             Geology                              Geophysics              Petrophysics                                Res.  Engineering  

Structure   3D  Seismic   Conventional  logs   Well  tests  

     -­‐Faults      -­‐Inversion   Special  logs   Production  data  
     -­‐Folds      -­‐Attributes   Core  
     -­‐Fractures  
Stratigraphy  
     -­‐Litho  
     -­‐Sequence   Identify  surfaces  and  structure  
     -­‐Bio  
Geochemistry  
Infill  volumes    
Outcrops   With  strata  

Building  a  
geological  
model  for  field   Grid  and  
Input  numerical  
development     parameters  

(and  exploration)  
Canfield  Ranch  Field  (OOIP  aprox.  4,000  
MMBO)within  the  San  Joaquin  Basin  is  
located  in  Kern  County,  California.      

This  reservoir  can  be  subdivided  

Into  two  major  intervals.    What  
are  they???    
 0   100%  

Sw  

Each  facies  has  

characteristic  porosity  
and  permeability  

Data  blocking  is  the  stage  where  data  are  

Original facies   Blocked facies   transferred  from  wells  resolution  to  grid  blocks  
 Image  Data  
-­‐Bedding  
-­‐Facies  
-­‐Lithology  
-­‐Environments  
-­‐Faults  
-­‐Fractures  
-­‐Stress  Directions  

N E Orientation
o
0o 90o 180 270o 360o

N E S W N
Dip azimuth is trough of sinusoid
Dip Angle = tan -1(h/d)
 Integration  of:    
             Geology                              Geophysics              Petrophysics                                Res.  Engineering  

Structure   3D  Seismic   Conventional  logs   Well  tests  

     -­‐Faults      -­‐Inversion   Special  logs   Production  data  
     -­‐Folds      -­‐Attributes   Core  
     -­‐Fractures  
Stratigraphy  
     -­‐Litho  
     -­‐Sequence   Identify  surfaces  and  structure  
     -­‐Bio  
Geochemistry  
Infill  volumes    
Outcrops   With  strata  

Building  a  
geological  
model  for  field   Grid  and  
Input  numerical  
development     parameters  

(and  exploration)  
Must  know    
depositional  
system  of  your  
reservoir  
 1. General Information
Location  /  Current  Production  and  Reserves  

Canfield  Ranch  Field  

 
Location:  Kern  County,  
California  -­‐  USA.  
 

Cumulative  Fluid   Estimated  Fluid    

     Production   Reserves  
Oil  (Mbbls)   40,063   1,002  
Gas  (MMcf)   39,036   1,150  
(Chernow  et.  al,  2009)  

ŚĞƌŶŽǁ͕ĞƌĞŬ͕͘DŝůůĞƌ͕ůĞŶĂ͕͘^ŶŽǁ͕>ĞƐƚĞƌ͘͞ϮϬϬϵŶŶƵĂůZĞƉŽƌƚŽĨƚŚĞ^ƚĂƚĞKŝůĂŶĚ'ĂƐ^ƵƉĞƌǀŝƐŽƌ͘͟^ĂĐƌĂŵĞŶƚŽ͕ĂůŝĨŽƌŶia,  2009.  
Channel  sandstones  (laterally  discontinuous)  

Sheet  sandstones    
(laterally  continuous)  

Canfield  Ranch  Field  (OOIP  aprox.  4,000  

MMBO)within  the  San  Joaquin  Basin  is  
located  in  Kern  County,  California.    It  is  a  
turbidite  reservoir  consisting  of  channel  
and  sheet  sandstones  and  some  shale-­‐
filled  channels.    
 Facies  Model  Cross  Section  C-­‐͛  
-400 0 400 800 1200 1600 2000 2400 2800 3200 3600 4000 4400 4800 5200 5600 6000 6400
-6000

-6000
-6400

-6400
-6800

-6800
-7200

-7200
-7600

-7600
Channel  Sands  
-8000

-8000
-8400

-8400
-8800

-8800
-9200

-9200
-9600

-9600

1.2832E+7
1.2832E+7
1001000 1002000 1003000 1004000 1005000

41-13
C  

1.2831E+7
1.2831E+7
-10000

-10000

1.283E+7
1.283E+7
0 250 500 750 1000 1250ft
-10400

-10400

1.2829E+7
1.2829E+7
44X-13

-400 0 400 800 1200 1600 2000 2400 2800 3200 3600 4000 4400 4800 5200 5600 35X-13 6000
55X-13 65-13 6400

36U-13
36L-13

1.2828E+7
1.2828E+7
46-13
56-13

37Z-13

Sand   Using  the  SP  log  a  simple  facies  model  were  created  with  just  sand  and  shale.  To   ͛   37L-13
47-13

1.2827E+7
1.2827E+7
18-13 48X-13

  populate  the  model  for  the  Sheet  sands  an  isotropic  variogram  were  used  and  for   38-13
78-13

Shale   the  channel  sands  a  strong  anisotropic  variogram  were  used  in  the  direction  of   1001000 1002000

0
1003000

500 1000
1004000

1500 2000ft
1005000

depositation  (N-­‐S).  
Work  Flow   Input  Data   Stratigraphic  Modeling   Structural  Modeling   Property  Modeling   Volume  Calculations  

Zone   Top   Base  

1   Marker  1   Top  Sand  1  

2   Top  Sand  1   Base  Sand  1  
3   Base  Sand  1   Top  Sand  2  
4   Top  Sand  2   Base  Sand  2  
5   Base  Sand  2   Top  Channel  1  
6   Top  Channel  1   Base  Channel  1  
7   Base  Channel  1   Top  Sheet  Sands  
8   Top  Sheet  Sands   Base  Sheet  Sands  

Note  this  is  a  different  zonation.  

The   orange   Zone   5   comprises   the  

discontinuous   channels   between   the   base   of  
Sand  2  and  the  top  of    channel    1.    The  light  
green   comprises   the   discontinuous   channels  
between   the   top   of  the   sheet   sands   and   the  
base  of  the  channel  1.    
 Volumetrics   Note  this  is  a  different  zonation.  
Case Bulk  volume[*10^6  ft3] Net  volume[*10^6  ft3] Pore  volume[*10^6  RB] HCPV  oil[*10^6  RB] STOIIP  (in  oil)[*10^6  STB] STOIIP[*10^6  STB] Recoverable  oil[*10^6  STB]
A 7280 0 0 0 0 0 0
B 6411 3 0 0 0 0 0
C 11400 29 0 0 0 0 0
D 8704 4228 258 92 87 87 17
E 13840 6131 290 107 102 102 20
F 8533 4094 183 60 57 57 11
G
H
9869
6581
5152
2753
261
118
84
44
80
42
80
42
Channel   16
8
I 8443 4808 234 81 77 77 15
J 14370 8852 443 171 163 163 Sheet   33
K 13190 2757 138 51 49 49 10
M 4336 2856 121 53 50 50 10
Total 112957 41663 2046 743 707 707 140

180   Channel  Sands   Sheet  Sands  

160  

140  

120  

100  
STOIIP[*10^6  STB]  
80   Recoverable  oil[*10^6  STB]  

60   Total  STOOIP:  707MM  STB  

Recoverable  Oil:  140MM  STB  
40  
Considering  the  low  
20   permeability  values  and  
assuming  a  primary  recovery  of  
0   20%  the  Recoverable  volume  is  
A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   M  
 Zone  J  Top  Subsea  Map  
1000000 1002000 1004000 1006000

1.2832E+7
1.2832E+7

-8400 -8400
Proposed  
41-13 Horizontal  
-8500 -8500 well  

1.283E+7
1.283E+7

-8600
-8600

-8700
E   44X-13 ͛  
35X-13
55X-13 65-13
0 0
-87
36U-13

1.2828E+7
36L-13
1.2828E+7

46-13 56-13

37Z-13 00
-87

47-13
0

Target  
-870

37L-13

18-13 48X-13
38-13
78-13

1.2826E+7
1.2826E+7

00
-88

Target  
1000000 1002000 1004000 1006000

0 500 1000 1500 2000ft

E   0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2200 2400 2600 2800 3000 ͛   The  zone  J  is  the  one  with  the  highest  oil  in  place,  specially  
because  of  the  good  lateral  continuity    and  thickness  of  the  
-8600

-8600
sheet  sands.  The  two  basal  sands  are  good  candidates  for  
horizontal  drilling.  
-8800

-8800

STOOIP  Zone  J  (Sheet  Sands):  163MM  STB  

-9000

-9000

Recoverable  Oil:  33MM  STB  

Good  lateral  continuity  for  horizontal  drilling.  
-9200

-9200
-9400

-9400

0 200 400 600 800 1000ft

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2200 2400 2600 2800 3000
 Integration  of:    
             Geology                              Geophysics              Petrophysics                                Res.  Engineering  

Structure   3D  Seismic   Conventional  logs   Well  tests  

     -­‐Faults      -­‐Inversion   Special  logs   Production  data  
     -­‐Folds      -­‐Attributes   Core  
     -­‐Fractures  
Stratigraphy  
     -­‐Litho  
     -­‐Sequence   Identify  surfaces  and  structure  
     -­‐Bio  
Geochemistry  
Infill  volumes    
Outcrops   With  strata  

Building  a  
geological  
model  for  field   Grid  and  
Input  numerical  
development     parameters  

(and  exploration)  
 Production  data  
‡ Connectivity   DATE WORK DESCRIPTION PRIOR PRODUCTION AFTER PRODUCTION
Oil, bbl Water, bbl Gas, Mcf Oil, bbl Water, bbl Gas, Mcf P, psi
‡ Interactive  Facies  Modeling   Jun-50 Oper. # 1: Open initial completion 7,786-7,805'. - - - 354 10 -
‡ Perforations  for  the  reservoir   May-53 Oper. # 2: Sqzd initial perfs & added 7,490-7,518 - - - 19 0 822
Dec-54 Oper. # 3: Added 7,788-7,803', 7,911-24'. 0 0 26 50 154 87
location   Feb-59 Oper. # 4: Sqzd all perfs, deepened to 10,265', & 1 100 20 129 1 84
‡ Volumes   open perfs 9,645-9,664',10,182-10,199', 10,209-
10,249'.
Oper. # 5: Reperfd 10,217-10,199', 10,174-93', 9,632-
May-90 60'. 17 24 2 10 22 0
& added 9,777-87', 9,766-71', 9,754-59', 9,424-34',
9,390-95', 9'353-65', 9'335-9,340', 9,322-27'.
Oper. # 6: Set brdg plug @ 9,300'. Open perfs 8,047-
May-92 52'. 20 86 4 62 26 90
Oper. # 7: Test/sqzd 7,800-05' (wet)& added 7,590-
Sep-00 7,605'. 17 95 20 26 153 19

Reservoir Drainage Calculations:

Cum (bbl) 59,000 Cum (bbl) 34,000

Bo (bbl/stb) 1.4 Bo (bbl/stb) 1.4
Poros (fract) 0.23 Poros (fract) 0.23
Sw (fract) 0.4 Sw (fract) 0.4
Re (fract) 0.35 Re (fract) 0.35
h (ft) 10 h (ft) 8
DRAINAG (acre) ---- DRAINAG (acre) ----
E AREA > 22 E AREA > 16

Cum (bbl) 145,000

Bo (bbl/stb) 1.4 18-13 MONTHLY DAILY
Poros (fract) 0.23 Info PROD OIL (bbl) WTR (bbl) GAS (Mcf) OIL (bbl) WTR (bbl) GAS (Mcf)
Sw (fract) 0.4 Jun-50 1 13 1835 2 732 141.2 0.2 56.3
Re (fract) 0.35 Jul-50 31 4051 112 2764 130.7 3.6 89.2
h (ft) 8
DRAINAG (acre) ----
E AREA > 68
 Daily Production History for KCL 47-13

500.0
OIL (10/98) Oper. # 3: Sqzd
(4/58) Oper. # 1: Open Dual Csg: 7385- GAS 7,365-7,460'. Test 8,815-
7405, Tbg: 9145-52, 9164-70, 9197- WATER 33'. BP @ 8,790'.
400.0 9206, 9228-36, 9241-45, 9273-77, (7/01) Oper. # 5:
9286-9316, 9349-70, 9566-94'. Added 8,743-
Oil (bbl), Water (bbl), Gas (Mcf)

(12/59) Oper. # 2: Added 7530-35'. 8,751' & Repf d

8,764-8,770'.

300.0 (9/00) Oper. # 4:

Open 8,764-8,769'.
(6/75) Brdg plg @ 7600',

200.0

?  
100.0 (6/91)
Clean w ell .

0.0
Jun-57 Dec-62 Jun-68 Dec-73 May-79 Nov-84 May-90 Oct-95 Apr-01Daily Production History for KCL 37Z-13
Date , dd/m m /yy
200.0 OIL
GAS
WATER (10/01)
(05/97)
Added #7
Daily Production History for KCL 37L-13 Added #5
150.0 (8/03)

Oil (bbl), Water (bbl), Gas (Mcf)

(12/95) Added # 8
300.0 Added #4
OIL
(3/97) Tested # 7 (w et).
GAS (10/95)
(5/96) Sqzd # 5 &
(3/98) Oper. # 9: Added WATER Added #3
cmt plug @ 7354' 100.0
9,097-9,101'.
(6/96) Open #6
(5/00) Oper. # 10: Test 7,476-
(10/91) Added #3 (7/96) Drll'd plug
82', 7,438-48' (Wet).
Oil (bbl), Water (bbl), Gas (Mcf)

(12/00) Sqzd all perfs,

(07/95)
200.0 (1/95) Added # 5 Drlld Horiz & liner # 6
(08/00) Oper. # 11: Reperfd #2
Added 8,019-22' & 50.0(01/95)
9,325-35'. Open #1
(12/93)
(1/01) Sqzd All Perfs.
(7/91) Added #4
Drlld Horiz, liner # 12.
Open #1,2.
(11/01) Oper. # 13: 0.0
100.0 Added 9,288-98' & Jun-94 Oct-95 Mar-97 Jul-98 Dec-99 Apr-01 Sep-02 Jan-04
9,272-78'.
Date, dd/mm/yy
(5/02) Oper. # 14:
Added 9,740-52',
9,560-9,600', 9,375-
80', 9,325-35'.
0.0
May-90 Sep-91 Jan-93 Jun-94 Oct-95 Mar-97 Jul-98 Dec-99 Apr-01 Sep-02 Jan-04
Date, dd/m m /yy
 Integration  of:    
             Geology                              Geophysics              Petrophysics                                Res.  Engineering  

Structure   3D  Seismic   Conventional  logs   Well  tests  

     -­‐Faults      -­‐Inversion   Special  logs   Production  data  
     -­‐Folds      -­‐Attributes   Core  
     -­‐Fractures  
Stratigraphy  
     -­‐Litho  
     -­‐Sequence   Identify  surfaces  and  structure  
     -­‐Bio  
Geochemistry  
Infill  volumes    
Outcrops   With  strata  

Building  a  
geological  
model  for  field   Grid  and  
Input  numerical  
development     parameters  

(and  exploration)