Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
PREPARED FOR
EPIC BURGER
Delivered by: TEAM BRAIN
Miranda Escutia, Mackenzie Greene, Dan Tausk, Caroline Crew, Scott Thomas
EXECUTIVE
1 2 3 4
MDO Preparation: How we decided on Explicit data from Explicit data from
literature search
Prior to the the Research
client secondary data and client-
interview we Objectives: It provided data:
meeting/informan
explored Epic was concluded that From the 2015 Fall
Burger's online their business t interview: consumer survey, 76% of
the consumers stated that
presence and problems were social Spencer stated
menu options was the
prepared relevant media and that “one of the most important factor in
questions. It delivery. Both social comparison to the dining
things Epic Burger
environment--motivating
was concluded that media and delivery wants is help with them to order delivery
their business MDOs were chosen According to Mintel, 67%
online
problems were because Epic Burger of millennials indicated
ordering” (Macken that they ordered from a
social media and could utilize social
delivery media to implement zie's Interview restaurant for delivery in
the last month
deliver services. Data)
SOLUTION (RFP)
Also followed the marketplace The unstructured part of the observations consists
best processes to avoid of how the customers interact with each other
combative overload and fatigue and/or the environment. Behaviors varied between
for our survey participants very social behavior and also very reserved behavior
(individuals isolated with only their technological
devices).
Solution, Qualtrics Survey: What design traits were
untraditional?
NOIR Questions: Interactive Avoids Leading:
Nominal and Ordinal
Features: Avoided leading
questions were
implemented in order to Photos and gifs were through pretesting our
collect the most reliable used to keep survey. Edits were
results. Skip logic to kept participants madein order to
the data as accurate as
engaged throughout keep questions
possible and user
friendly.
the survey. objective.
Multiple
Exhaustive
Pretests:
Responses:
Two pretests
Participants were
provided with multiple, during class time were
exhaustive implemented.
options per question in Optimized time by
order to obtain their making edits to the
true feelings. survey after
pretesting.
SAMPLING
What is the sampling frame? Does the Is it clear who is underrepresented by What ethical dilemmas happened or
frame fairly represent the population the research or not represented at all? If might happen? Did everyone have a
under study? so, what are those demographics? fair chance?
For Analysis, planned the dates Transform -> Recode into the
and locations for in store Same Variables -> select the
observations. Then, reported
Variable -> click "Old and
findings to come to conclusions.
For the survey analysis, each New Values" -> select
RO was analyzed individually. "System-missing" under Old
From Qualtrics, Value -> Add the New Value
click Data & (i.e. 2=no) -> click Continue -
Analysis at the top > click OK
bar. Then on the right
there is an export and *Make sure to also include
import button. Click export data. codes for the Value via
Then it will export the data to SPSS (if your Variable View e.g. 1 = yes 2
computer has that feature) = no This coding can be
completed either before or
the Transform sequence
above.
Conclusion
RO 1: To determine millennial delivery habits and
preferences
Q6: How often do you currently use delivery? 61.1% (n=40) of participants who
Q7: What is most important when you order food for order food for delivery once in a
delivery? given month value price
Q8: What hinders you from ordering food for delivery? 72.5% of participants selected that
(select all that apply) ordering food for delivery was too
expensive
Cross-Tab of Questions:
Which delivery services do you use
MOST when ordering food for
delivery
&
If you were allowed only allowed to
order one type of food for delivery,
which would
you pick?
CONCLUSION, INSIGHTS
Recommendation
Mintel. “Fast Casual Restaurants—US” Feb. 2017. Mintel. Loyola University Chicago, Chicago,
IL. 1 May. 2018.
Mintel. “Social Media in Foodservice—US” Aug. 2017. Mintel. Loyola University Chicago,
Chicago, IL. 1 May. 2018.
Mintel. “Restaurant Decision Making Process—US” Dec. 2017. Mintel. Loyola University
Chicago, Chicago, IL. 1 May 2018.
Patton, Brooke, and Lisa Whetstone. “5 Pitfalls in Quantitative Research and How to Avoid
Them.” GutCheck, 14 June 2017, www.gutcheckit.com/blog/5-pitfalls-quantitative-research-
avoid/?utm_content=link.
LinkedIn