0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
221 Ansichten1 Seite
The three classroom management models compared are the Thomas Gordon Model, Dreikurs Logical Consequences Model, and Canter Assertive Discipline Model. The Thomas Gordon Model focuses on accepting teacher-student relationships and student-led problem solving. The Dreikurs Model considers student motivation and uses logical consequences to encourage responsibility. The Canter Model takes a direct, positive approach to ensure teacher instruction and student learning through consistent enforcement of classroom rules.
The three classroom management models compared are the Thomas Gordon Model, Dreikurs Logical Consequences Model, and Canter Assertive Discipline Model. The Thomas Gordon Model focuses on accepting teacher-student relationships and student-led problem solving. The Dreikurs Model considers student motivation and uses logical consequences to encourage responsibility. The Canter Model takes a direct, positive approach to ensure teacher instruction and student learning through consistent enforcement of classroom rules.
The three classroom management models compared are the Thomas Gordon Model, Dreikurs Logical Consequences Model, and Canter Assertive Discipline Model. The Thomas Gordon Model focuses on accepting teacher-student relationships and student-led problem solving. The Dreikurs Model considers student motivation and uses logical consequences to encourage responsibility. The Canter Model takes a direct, positive approach to ensure teacher instruction and student learning through consistent enforcement of classroom rules.
COMPARISON BETWEEN THOMAS GORDON CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT MODEL, DREIKURS LOGICAL CONSEQUENCES MODEL AND
CANTER ASSERTIVE DISCIPLINE MODEL
THOMAS GORDON CLASSROOM DREIKURS LOGICAL CANTER ASSERTIVE DISCIPLINE
MANAGEMENT MODEL CONSEQUENCES MODEL MODEL
A direct and positive approach to make it
Known as Teacher Effectiveness Training possible for the teacher to teach and the students to learn. (T.E.T) A more humanistic approach than just Based on the philosophy of Carl Rogers- It is based on several principles: focusing on discipline both teachers and students have rights in the children are inherently rational and if Promote intrinsic motivation, self-control and directed and forced teachers by teachers, classroom personal responsibility they will be stifled while giving rewards and punishments, teachers The teacher considers the motivation and Assumptions: student is internally must work towards creating and optimal learning goals of the student behaviour in the motivated to be good, should be supported environment. development of a management plan by an accepting relationship and is Teachers must apply rules and enforce The teacher applies Logical Consequences to capable of solving own problems consequences consistently without bias or assist students in taking responsibility for their Teachers are taught to: observe the discrimination. actions and behaviours behaviour, identify who owns problem, Teacher should be assertive rather than non- The teacher’s role is helping pupils to impose demonstrate understanding, be assertive or hostile. limits on themselves. understood, confront if necessary and use Assertive teachers: clearly and firmly express Teacher can model democratic behaviour by win-win problem-solving. their needs. They have positive expectation of providing guidance and leadership and Curriculum design involves structured involving pupils in setting rules and students. they say what they mean, and mean activities, student ownership, what they say. They are consistently and fair. consequences communication and analysis of learning. Non-assertive teachers: fail to make their needs or wants known. They appear indecisive which confuses students. They threaten but students know there will be no follow through.
Manage the classroom in particular ways
Prevent misbehaviours in the classroom Create good and responsible students