Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
ARPES on Correlated
Electron Systems
CUSO Lecture – Lausanne 02/2011
Outline
• Introduction: Transition metal oxides
• ARPES: Fundamentals and spectral function
• ARPES: Technique and developments
• Sr2RuO4: A Fermi liquid with SO coupling
• Polarons and sudden approximation
• HTSC: The fate of quasiparticle strength
http://www.physics.ubc.ca/~quantmat/ARPES/RESEARCH/ARPES_intro.html
http://www.physics.ubc.ca/~quantmat/ARPES/RESEARCH/ARPES_intro.html
Outline Part I
Introduction:
Transition metal oxides
• Mott-Hubbard
Temperature (K)
'Normal'
• Heavy Fermions 200 Metal
Ps
• Unconventional SC
eu
do
100
• Spin-charge order
ga
AF AF
p
• Colossal MR 0 SC SC
0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3
Dopant Concentration x
Strongly Correlated Electron Systems
d-f U<<W
Charge fluctuations
open
shells U>>W
materials Spin fluctuations
radial extent
Temperature (K)
'Normal'
200 Metal
Ps
eu
Spin-orbit
do
100
ga
AF AF
p
coupling 0 SC SC
0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3
Dopant Concentration x
Novel Complex Materials and Functionalities
Tune the physical properties • Modern synthesis methods
Single crystals, multilayers, nanostructures
Chakhalian et al., Nature Physics 2006
CMR
Understand interplay of
Interface-tuned magnetism
lattice, spin, charge, orbital
in oxide multilayers
degrees of freedom
Outline Part I
ARPES: Fundamentals
and spectral function
Crystal Electronic
Structure? Structure?
X-ray Photoelectron
diffraction spectroscopy
Scientific application: Spectroscopy
Andrea Ekin EB
Damascelli
Scientific application: Spectroscopy
Andrea Ekin EB
Damascelli
Solid State: Electrons in Reciprocal Space
Many properties of a solids are
determined by electrons near EF
(conductivity, magnetoresistance, Allowed electronic states
superconductivity, magnetism) Repeated-zone scheme (E ,k)
EF
Energy
Momentum Momentum
Reinert & Hufner, NJP 2005 Zhou et al., Nat. Phys. 2006
Angle-Resolved Photoemission
A “Simple” Example : Metal Surfaces (Cu and Spectroscopy
Ag)
K=p = Ekin
Ekin, ,
Ekin EB
K k
ARPES:
A “Simple” One-Step
Example vs Three-Step
: Metal Surfaces (Cu and Ag) Model
Photoemission
Intensity I(k,)
One-step model
ARPES:
A “Simple” One-Step
Example vs Three-Step
: Metal Surfaces (Cu and Ag) Model
Photoemission
Intensity I(k,)
Photoemission
Intensity I(k,)
Sudden approximation
One Slater determinant
ARPES:
A “Simple” The
Example Sudden
: Metal Approximation
Surfaces (Cu and Ag)
Photoemission
Intensity I(k,)
Sudden approximation
One Slater determinant
ARPES:
A “Simple” The
Example Sudden
: Metal Approximation
Surfaces (Cu and Ag)
Photoemission
Intensity I(k,)
Sudden approximation
One Slater determinant
Photoemission
Intensity I(k,)
Sudden approximation
One Slater determinant
Photoemission
Intensity I(k,)
Sudden approximation
One Slater determinant
ARPES:
A “Simple” Role
Example ofSurfaces
: Metal the Crystal Potential
(Cu and Ag)
Photoemission
Intensity I(k,)
Photoemission
Intensity I(k,)
Ekin, ,
Energy Conservation
Ekin EB
Momentum Conservation
k|| K|| Ekin
ARPES: Energetics and Kinematics
Electrons in
Reciprocal Space
Ekin, , k||
kF
EF EB
Energy Conservation
Ekin EB
Momentum Conservation K||
Photoemission intensity:
Photoemission intensity:
No Renormalization
Infinite lifetime
(k,) : the “self-energy” captures the effects of interactions
Nature 342, 480 (1989)
Franck-Condon
“In gaseous hydrogen, the equilibrium bond length is dependent on the degree of occupation of that level. The electrons
are dressed by interatomic displacements. The intensities are given by the Franck-Condon factors, the molecular
equivalent of the sudden approximation. The ARPES spectrum of solid hydrogen, developed from the molecular spectrum,
will be angle dependent but for some angle will resemble the broken line. The fundamental transition (0-0) becomes the
solid state quasiparticle peak. The phonon excitations develop into a broad, incoherent quasicontinuum.”
ARPES: The One-Particle Spectral Function
A. Damascelli, Z. Hussain, Z.-X Shen, Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 473 (2003)
Im=21.5eV
EF
=0.31
Energy
Courtesy of
T. Takahashi
Momentum
N.J.C. Ingle, K.M. Shen, A. Damascelli et al., PRB 72, 205114 (2005)
Outline Part I
ARPES: Technique
and developments
E (meV)
past 20-40 2°
now 1-10 0.2°
Angle-Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy
E (meV)
past 20-40 2°
now 1-10 0.2°
Angle-Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy
Sr2RuO4
Parallel multi-angle recording
Improved energy resolution
Momentum
Improved momentum resolution
Improved data-acquisition efficiency
E (meV)
past 20-40 2°
now 1-10 0.2°
Binding Energy
Angle-Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy
E (meV)
past 20-40 2°
now 1-10 0.2°
A. Damascelli et al., PRL 85, 5194 (2000)
Angle-Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy
E (meV)
1-10 0.2°
NIM/SCIENTA System
Au sample
h=22.7 eV
Intensity (a.u.)
T=10 K
Total
Total
resolution
Resolution
5.0meV
5.0 meV
20 10 0 -10
Binding Energy (meV)
New Developments: ARPES + Spin + Time
ARPES+Spin polarimeter ARPES+Time of Fight
UBC - Geneva
Nishide et a., New J. Phys. 12, 065011 (2010) Wang et al., arXiv:1101.5636 (2011)
ARPES:
Advantages Surface
and Limitations vs Bulk
of ARPES Sensitivity
HeI
21.2 eV
o
10 A
CeRu2
TK=22K
Seah, Dench et al., SIA 1, 2 (1979) Sekiyama et al., Nature 403, 396 (2000)
ARPES:
Advantages Advantages
and Limitations and
of ARPES Limitations
Advantages Limitations
Mackenzie & Maeno, RMP 75, 657 (2003) Xia et al., PRL 97, 167002 (2006)
1D (dxz,yz) versus 2D (dxy) Superconductivity ?
Ru4+ 4d 4 z z z
y y y
eg
x x x
t2g
xz yz xy
S=1
dxy dyz,xz
Bergemann et al., PRL 84, 2662 (2000) Mazin et al., PRL 79, 733 (1997) Damascelli et al, PRL 85, 5194 (2000)
The Fermi Surface of Sr2RuO4
Bergemann et al., PRL 84, 2662 (2000) Damascelli et al, PRL 85, 5194 (2000) Damascelli et al, PRL 85, 5194 (2000)
surface
Cleavage bulk
plane
3
M. Braden et al., PRB 57, 1236 (1998) O. Friedt et al., PRB 63, 174432 (2001)
Cleaving-Temperature Dependence of Sr2RuO4 Surfaces
Temperature dependent STM
“Protrusion”
0 0
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
A. Liebsch et al, PRL 84, 1591 (2000) Mazin et al., PRL 79, 733 (1997)
Band Renormalization by Electronic Correlations
Ru4+ 4d 4 z z z
y y y
eg
x x x
t2g
xz yz xy
S=1
v = E / k
U = 1eV
vFband / vF exp
= 3.2
M
A. Liebsch et al, PRL 84, 1591 (2000) Damascelli et al., PRL 101, 026406 (2008)
Many-Body Correlation Effects in Sr2RuO4
Im=21.5eV
EF
=0.31
Energy
Courtesy of
T. Takahashi
Momentum
N.J.C. Ingle, K.M. Shen, A. Damascelli et al., PRB 72, 205114 (2005)
What is the role of spin-orbit coupling in Ru-oxides?
In Sr2RuO4 it has been effectively mostly ignored!
Eigenstates with Spin-Orbit Coupling
M.W. Haverkort, I.S. Elfimov, L.H. Tjeng, G.A. Sawatzky, A. Damascelli, PRL 101, 026406 (2008)
Importance of Spin-Orbit Coupling in 4d Oxides
xy
xz
yz
M.W. Haverkort, I.S. Elfimov, L.H. Tjeng, G.A. Sawatzky, A. Damascelli, PRL 101, 026406 (2008)
Outline Part II
Polarons and
sudden approximation
Franck-Condon
“In gaseous hydrogen, the equilibrium bond length is dependent on the degree of occupation of that level. The electrons
are dressed by interatomic displacements. The intensities are given by the Franck-Condon factors, the molecular
equivalent of the sudden approximation. The ARPES spectrum of solid hydrogen, developed from the molecular spectrum,
will be angle dependent but for some angle will resemble the broken line. The fundamental transition (0-0) becomes the
solid state quasiparticle peak. The phonon excitations develop into a broad, incoherent quasicontinuum.”
Development
A “Simple” Exampleof Low-Energy
: Metal LASER-ARPES
Surfaces (Cu and Ag)
Development
A “Simple” Exampleof Low-Energy
: Metal LASER-ARPES
Surfaces (Cu and Ag)
Low energy ARPES is now becoming popular as a new tool for spectroscopy
Im=21.5eV
EF
=0.31
Energy
Courtesy of
T. Takahashi
Momentum
N.J.C. Ingle, K.M. Shen, A. Damascelli et al., PRB 72, 205114 (2005)
Many-Body effects in the High-TC Cuprates
Magnetic fluctuations ?
Mechanism for High-TC
Electron-phonon coupling ?
Veenstra, Goodvin, Berciu, Damascelli, PRB 82, 012504 (2010)
Renormalization of Polaronic Quasiparticles
Far from the Migdal limit (<<EF for a parabolic band), the effective coupling parameters deduced from
the renormalization of quasiparticle mass, velocity, and spectral weight are momentum dependent and,
in general, distinct from the true microscopic coupling; the latter is thus not readily accessible in the
quasiparticle dispersion revealed by ARPES through the mass enhancement factor 1/(1+).
Tl2201
U
Correlations suppress Zk
Tl2201
U
A. Damascelli, Z. Hussain, Z.-X Shen, Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 473 (2003) -- see pgs 486-490
Doping a Mott Insulator: Spectral Weight Transfer
It is the connection between low and high energy scales that distinguishes the
Mott gap from a more conventional gap (i.e., semiconductor, CDW, etc.)
Undoped
Hole-doped
Electron-doped
Doping a Mott Insulator: Spectral Weight Transfer
It is the connection between low and high energy scales that distinguishes the
Mott gap from a more conventional gap (i.e., semiconductor, CDW, etc.)
Doping a Mott Insulator: Spectral Weight Transfer
Meinders, Eskes, Sawatzky , PRB 48, 3916 (1993) C.T. Chen et al., PRL 66, 104 (1991)
It is the connection between low and high energy scales that distinguishes the
Mott gap from a more conventional gap (i.e., semiconductor, CDW, etc.)
Fermiology of Underdoped YBCO
=0
Energy
Momentum
Veenstra, Goodvin, Berciu, Damascelli, PRB 82, 012504 (2010)
Renormalization of Polaronic Quasiparticles
=0.1
Energy
Momentum
Veenstra, Goodvin, Berciu, Damascelli, PRB 82, 012504 (2010)
Renormalization of Polaronic Quasiparticles
=0.5
Energy
Momentum
Veenstra, Goodvin, Berciu, Damascelli, PRB 82, 012504 (2010)
Renormalization of Polaronic Quasiparticles
>0.5
Zk=0
Energy
Momentum
Veenstra, Goodvin, Berciu, Damascelli, PRB 82, 012504 (2010)
Renormalization of Polaronic Quasiparticles
>0.5
Zk=0
Energy
~
Sawatzky, Anderson, Randeria, Rice, et al.
Bilayer band splitting and quasiparticle coherence
Basov et al.
PRB 2005
• Quantitative estimate of Z
• Agreement with 2p/(p+1) for x>0.23
• Isotropic ZN~0.54 and ZAN~0.50
• Vanishing ZN below 15-10%
• t~10meV consistent with QO
• Z even smaller for pockets’ “other side”
• Pseudogap? Loss of coherent SW
• Fermi surface? Luttinger’s counting?
Thank you!