Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Beyond Onboarding
BY DAVID CREELMAN
01 // Beyond Onboarding
I’ll reveal one part of the story right away. The reason it makes sense to think beyond
onboarding now is that we have the technologies to make it easier. Managing
transitions was always a good idea, but it was not always practical. Automation allows
us to do much more.
Yet this is not a story about technology or a list of onboarding tips. It is about
recognizing that processes for managing work transitions are valuable and relatively
straightforward to put in place. It is a great way for HR to add value and at the same
time craft an exceptionally high-touch experience for employees.
1. Onboarding – the classic transition that has long been managed through a
formal process.
These sorts of transitions exist in most organizations but do not exhaust the
possibilities. Once you begin thinking about transitions, and developing the processes
to handle them, you may find other sorts of transitions which are particularly important
in your own organization. Whatever the type of transition, each is a “moment of truth”
for the company; this is a time when employees need support and if you deliver it to
them, it creates a glow that lasts for years.
3. Manage workflow
If new hires need a desk, security clearance, a parking spot, and a meeting with
HR, all those steps and more can be coordinated by workflow software.
1. Trigger. Identify the event that will launch the process. Typically a good rule is
‘the sooner the better.’ In the case of onboarding you should not wait until the
new hire walks in the door. Rather, the decision to hire someone should trigger
the onboarding process and begin sending relevant information to the new hire.
2. Workflow. The most important part of process design is the workflow defining
what needs to be done, when, and by whom. The required steps encompass
everything from filling in forms, to providing information, to scheduling meetings.
HR is the process owner but that doesn’t mean HR needs to do all the work. The
managers will have a sense of what needs to be done to smooth transitions, so tap their
expertise. And since the biggest winner is the employee, tap them to say what would
have made their transitions easier.
1. Have you checked-in with the business units to find out where there are time to
proficiency problems, unwanted turnover or other issues that can be improved
through better onboarding?
2. Are you starting early enough? There is no reason not to begin the moment the
hiring decision is made.
4. Have you checked-in with people who were recently hired to be sure they had
all the information and tools they needed?
5. Have you included anything that goes beyond meeting basic needs to actually
delighting the employee?
An ambitious overhaul may be required, but simply getting the administrative side
of onboarding automated can be such an improvement that it will win fans for
implementing other well-designed transition processes.
1. Voluntary departure
2. Involuntary departure
3. Retirement
4. Maternity
Maternity may seem a little out of place here, but as we will see it has a lot in common
with the other flavors of off-boarding. These commonalities are:
1. Preparation
When off-boarding can be predicted well in advance (retirement, maternity)
there is an opportunity to provide employees with a lot of preparation before
they leave the organization.
2. Continuity management
The transfer of knowledge and relationships is important. This can include
simple things like passwords and complex things like helping a new sales rep
build relationships with old customers.
3. Administration
For example, ensuring assets are returned (laptops, smartphones, etc.).
Handling security issues (the employee’s access to the intranet and physical
premises). Completing forms (anything to do with tax, payroll, and so on).
4. Ongoing connection
Organizations may want to retain a connection with employees for a variety of
reasons, the most common one being that an alumni network can be useful for
sourcing talent.
The process for voluntary departures is the easiest. The employee will normally give
reasonable notice and be happy to cooperate in continuity management
and administration.
Involuntary departures happen very quickly, but that is all the more reason to have a
highly honed process that will ensure nothing falls through the cracks.
Retirement has special challenges. Dianna Tafazoli is president and CEO of DBK
Associates and author of The Role and Responsibility of HR in Retirement and Transition
Readiness. She points out that most people are very poorly prepared, emotionally and
financially, for retirement. Unlike onboarding, which is full of excitement, retirement can
be a difficult time. As well as serving the organization’s need for a smooth transition,
Tafazoli argues that there is a social responsibility component to having a good
retirement process.
Loneliness, depression, and even suicide are problems among retirees, and lack
of financial preparedness puts a burden on the economy. A transition process that
helps connect retirees to volunteer and community involvement opportunities can be
very helpful. The financial side can partly be handled by the off-boarding process, but
Tafazoli notes that it takes many years to build up savings, and that even if the trigger
for the off-boarding process is five years before retirement, that won’t be enough to get
a neglected savings plan in order.
The key to avoiding overbearing processes is to lean toward guiding rather than compelling. The key to
making processes easy to maintain is to avoid unnecessary detail. We’ve already talked a bit about continuity
management. It may be tempting for HR to want to hold a manager’s hand and make sure they handle every
possible aspect of knowledge transfer. Yet it is probably sufficient in an off-boarding process to ask managers
“Have you set aside time to do knowledge transfer?” In some cases it may be a 30-second conversation
(“Where did you put the keys to the storage room?”), while in other cases it may involve an extensive process of
having the person who is leaving train a replacement.
If your processes have a light touch, and use a common technology, then transition processes simply become
a normal part of how work is done and a sign of a professionally run HR department. A reliance on processes
also signals a purposefulness; it emphasizes doing things right, not just getting them done.
Maternity may not feel like it belongs on the list because one expects the employee to
return. However, most of the same off-boarding issues apply; particularly maintaining
an ongoing connection. When an employee does return after taking time off for children,
a good process soothes what can be a difficult transition.
While setting up processes for these different off-boarding situations may seem like a lot
of work, once in place they take the load off HR and managers as the appropriate steps
have been thought through and the process ensures no one drops the ball.
• Significant promotions
• Relocations
Significant Promotions
There are a number of upward transitions that are particularly difficult and HR
should be prepared with processes that reduce the risk of failure and improve time
to proficiency. Jon Younger, a consultant at the RBL Group in New York, points to work
by Harvard Business School professors Gene Dalton and Paul Thompson on four
career stages.
Jon says that when someone moves up a stage they often experience an “Oh sh-t!”
moment, as they realize that what worked for them before won’t do the trick at this
new level. An internal transfer transition process should share information about
these stages and provide guidance on how to successfully adjust to the new role. The
transition process may well include suggested reading, scheduling various kinds of
training, or arranging for a mentor. Not every upward move needs this much support,
but the transition process should support these major changes.
Another kind of internal transfer that deserves special attention in a transition process
is a move from line to staff or staff to line. In Japan these kinds of transfers are seen as
essential to leadership development, and Japanese consultants have suggestions for
the key things to be aware of:
• Line managers frequently underestimate the complexity of staff roles. They need
to be prepared to take on a difficult job that requires new skills.
• Staff managers who move to line jobs may need to learn to be more directive
and more decisive in their management style.
• Staff managers tend to value process, but in line jobs results matter more.
It is a mistake to assume that managers ‘know this stuff already.’ A transition process
can ensure people get access to the right resources and training, as well as handling
all the administrative issues of any transfer.
Relocation
However, if the organization does not use an external provider, then it absolutely
needs a well- thought-out process to consistently handle relocations. There are many
issues to be managed and according to Stephen Cryne, president and CEO of the
Canadian Employee Relocation Council (CERC), there are three areas in particular that
are often overlooked:
If you have had a chance to create processes for other transitions then you will have
the pieces you need to build a process for easing an acquisition. If not then this is the
perfect time to invest in both building processes and acquiring technology to
automate them.
An acquisition is much like onboarding, so in that sense it is familiar terrain. The sheer
scale, however, makes everything harder. And while onboarding is typically a happy
event, an acquisition will be plagued with mixed emotions (see sidebar: The Emotional
Stuff). As I have said, transitions are a moment of truth and how well employees are
cared for in the early days of an acquisition can have a large and long-term impact
on the business.
This is relatively new terrain. The guts of the answer is that the emotional side needs to be handled
face to face. That means the job of the transition process is to make sure those face-to- face meetings
are happening.
It is also conceivable that creative HR leaders will find ways to use videos on the transition portal to
set the right tone. Perhaps videos of people talking about their experience in an involuntary transition
and modeling the right attitudes. The right attitudes, according to Dutch consultant Coert Visser,
revolve around elegance and self-determination. Behaving elegantly revolves around being able
to view things from the other person’s perspective, taking a long-term perspective, and to be mild
and forgiving. Self-determination involves adopting the position that you can have an impact on the
outcomes and that you are not just a passive victim of something thrust involuntary upon you.
Coert also warns us that even voluntary transitions are beset with emotional mood swings. The
excitement of taking a new job is often followed by a period of frustration or disappointment. The
best transition processes will schedule face-to-face meetings to check that nothing has gone
seriously awry.
Making it happen
We started this e-book by noting that while managers believed onboarding was a
good idea, they often handled it poorly. The same thing goes for all the
beyond onboarding transitions as well. There are things HR can do to make sure
that transitions are handled effectively, things that will also speed up time to
proficiency, minimize unwanted turnover, and create a memorable high-touch
experience for employees.
1. Have processes
You cannot blame managers for doing a poor job of overseeing a transition if
they do not have a process that guides them. Thinking through the triggering
2. Automate
Automation of transition processes is not unduly difficult or expensive.
Automation makes the process easier and more reliable. In fact, once you have
automated transition processes it will be hard to imagine having done it any
other way.
3. Create accountability
When a transition goes badly is anyone held accountable for making sure it
won’t happen again? Does anyone even know how well a transition has gone?
Part of the automated transition process should include an evaluation of what
went well, what did not, and if anything important was missed. A questionnaire
completed by the employee is an easy way to keep an eye out for problems.
Onboarding has long been a part of HR’s toolkit. Now is the time to move beyond
onboarding and make transition processes part of your organization’s standard way of
doing business.
The three big drivers of value are reduced waste (i.e., avoiding problems when things go
wrong); improved time to proficiency; and improved engagement. A fourth driver is reduced
administration costs.
Look at the impact on the following areas when you need to demonstrate the value of transition
management.
Reduced waste
• Cost of errors (such as no knowledge transfer) due to poor planning of transition
• Unwanted turnover
Improved engagement
• Better productivity
• Better retention
For some of these factors one can work with management to estimate the financial impact; for others,
illustrative stories will be very convincing. It doesn’t take too many cases of angry employees who
have suffered from a poor transition, angry customers inadequately served by poorly oriented new
employees, or projects gone off track because of poor knowledge transfer to convince managers that
improved transition processes make sense. On a more positive note, glowing reports from employees
about excellent transition processes are also important for leaders in assessing whether or not this is
a good investment.
David Creelman is CEO of Creelman Research. He does writing, research and speaking
on the most critical issues in human capital management. His clients include think
tanks, consultants, academics and organizations in Japan, the US, Canada and the EU.
He publishes regularly in the US, Japan, Turkey, Brazil, South Africa, Holland, Romania
and Singapore.
Prior to founding his own company David was Chief of Content and Research for
HR.com. As the first employee of HR.com David played an integral role in growing
a successful dot com; one that continues to thrive. For many years David was a
management consultant in Canada and Malaysia, most notably with the Hay Group.
He has an MBA from the University of Western Ontario and a Combined Honours B.Sc.
in Chemistry and Biochemistry from McMaster.