ARBITRATION IN CRIMINAL ALGORITHM

Date 2-1-2019

THE LEGAL RESEARCH JOURNAL.

JUDICIAL RIGHTS INVESTIGATION SERVICE.
3742 Pipeline Rd.
Panama City Florida 32404.
Case no. 00108
Lower Court Case No
Dear Mr. Smith,
We have received your complaint on or about December 3, 2018. Your issues
are listed as follows.

Due to the partial United States Government Shut Down, the “Supreme Tribunal of
the Juris” shall hear cases only, pertaining to complaints in which a person is
accused of a non-violent offense; and that a person is a Resident, Civilian, or
Member of the GOVERNMENT OF USIC, that are subjected to a sentence of
incarceration.
(See) Title 22 USIC 0.3 §21.2 (4) (a) and (b) (Juris Rules and Codes)(2015).

Under the Juris Code of ethics, it is unconstitutional; and therefore against Juris
Law, for the Supreme Tribunal to hear cases of criminal concerns in which there is
no victim, or accuser. Unless, the Lower Tribunal Courts has violated clear and
established Constitutional authority of Juris Rules of Criminal procedure.
(see) (Judicial Note § 22.2(6)(I).

1
 THE JUDICIAL RIGHTS INVESTIGATION SERVICE made contact with
the East Brewton Police Department 615 Forrest Ave, East Brewton Al; 36426 on
or about December. Arbiter Belion / Juris No. 002278 spoke with Officer # 202.
Our Agent explained to officer 202 that the your Judge residing on the case is in
need for you to be represented by counsel. Thus, in order for this independent
Government Agency to adequately resolve this matter, it is the duty of the accused
to furnish the “police investigatory report” to this agency; so that the SUPREME
TRIBUNAL OF THE JURIS may issue order(s) of dismissal in particular cases
were the Lower Courts cannot demonstrate a violation or injury toward a physical
person. It is your constitutional right to observe and confront the injured person
upon the record that’s held against you. See “Discovery” Fed. Rule 26 (A) (i)(iv).

In order for the “SUPREME TRIBUNAL OF THE JURIS” to reside over this case
in its original jurisdiction. Therefore, complainants are directed to.

1) Complete and submit on file the Affidavit of Status.

2) Submit, and file on record the NEWLY DISCOVERED EVIDENCE.

3) Receipt of the filing shall be forwarded to this Agency.

You should understand that the actual definition of Pleading is to “beg”.

Therefore, under the constitution of Intro-National Law Policy, which has
recognized that resident(s) civilian(s), and member(s) of the GOVERNMENT OF
USIC are human people, and shall not be forced to beg. In contrast, resident(s),
civilian(s), and member(s) are encouraged not to beg or plea to any criminal
charges non substantiated with acts of violence.
If the Lower Courts, or Charging Agency fail to allow you to observe the record
that is being held against you, please notify this agency through a formal request
that is attached to this letter. We shall then notify the court through the formal
process of “Notion to Divest Jurisdiction” to reside over this case.
(See) (Title 22 USIC 0.3 §32.2 (3) (4) (Juris Rules Codes) (2015).

2
Attached you shall find.
a) The Affidavit of Status.
b) The formal request to the Judicial Rights Investigation Service.
c) Arbitration in Criminal Algorithm 2019 / Newly discovered evidence in
your case.

Your concern.
JUDICIAL RIGHTS INVESTIGATION SERVICE.

Barbra Emery Juris No. 002015.

FILED THIS DAY FEBRUARY 1, 2019.
SECRETARY OF THE JURIS.