Sie sind auf Seite 1von 3

Ultimate Facts – means the - Must be the result of • (a) Full discussion of known

essential facts constituting proper and honest facts of the case in the
the plaintiff’s/complainant’s inquiries and efforts proceedings
cause of action - Must connect to an • (b) Submit affidavits and
objective reality / documents
• Such facts are so essential
objective fact - Identity Issues
that they cannot be stricken
- Facilitate settlement
out without leaving the Unfounded B.
- Limit scope of trial
statement of the cause of • Product of pure
• (c) Not a contest to destroy
action inadequate. subjectivism
the other parties / their
• Distance from
Question of Fact cases
objective world
• But collective effort of all
•Question Form (Preferred) • Unmindful of the
• To search for the truth and
•Whether… • To render justice to all
Admission –
Issue is Legal Disputed Facts – Must
Benefit:
•An issue is legal when the be proven
(d) Save Court’s time
contending partied assume a -Test: Relevancy and
(e) Encourage efficiency
thing exists or has actually Materiality
happened, but disagree on Mandatory Disclosure of
Material – when
its legal significance or effect Evidence
expression /
on their rights / obligations.  Disclose evidence
concealment of w/c
during Pre-trial
All legal issues -> SC would reasonably result
otherwise not
Factual Issue -> Trial (RTC, in a diff. decision.
allowed except at
MTC) Evidence – Proves fact the discretion of the
Establishing Facts court
Due diligence (Check list)
•Testimonial Evidence • Company Profile 1. Objective Evidence
•Object and Documentary • Company Records - Objects s evidence
Evidence • Financial Docs are those addressed
•Circumstantial Evidence •Contracts to the senses of the
•Personnel data court. When an
Fact •Other related transaction object ______ to the
- Thing / Event •Stakeholder fact in issue, it may
- Something that be exhibited to,
exists / does not Litigation (Judicial / Quasi- examined / viewed
exist judicial) by the court
- Something that *Investigation - Ruler 130, Section 1
happened / did not *Evidence-taking (ROE)
happen 2. Documentary
Pre-Trial (Preliminary
Conference) Evidence
Well founded belief (Clear
Policy - As evidence consists
and Sound Idea)
of writing / any
material containing
letters, words, -Witness can only Direct Examination
numbers, figures, testify to those facts
Questions – who,
symbols / other w/c he knows of his
what, when, where,
modes of written personal knowledge,
why, which, how
expression that is w/c are
derived from his own • Not leading
Best evidence rule: Original perception, except as question
Sec. 4, Rule 130 (ROE) otherwise provided
a. Original itself in these rules -Leading question
b. Duplicate Original suggests to the
c. Certified Copy •Not a statement of witness the answer
opinion (belief) w/c the examining
Exceptions (Section 3 Rule -Except: Expert party desires
130 ROE) Witness Judicial affidavit
a. Original – Lost -Shall take the place
b. Fails to produce it Witness of such witnesses’
c. Original consists of -Identify direct testimonies
numerous Documentary
documents / other Evidence Contents
documents -Identify Object a. Name, age,
d. Original is public Evidence address
record -Attest to the truth, b. Lawyer
whole truth and c. Oath
3. Testimonial nothing but the truth d. Signature
Evidence – to the facts e. Jurat
Formal written /
Spoken statements Order of Questions and answer
Examination of • concretively numbered
Witness (Section 20 witness
Rule 130) a. Direct • ___ the circumstances
-all (normal) persons examination ___
Cross Examination – Stand in
who can perceive proponent
direct examination or
and perceiving, can b. Cross
connected them
make their examination ___
perception to others opponent -to test the accuracy and
(may be witnesses) c. Re-direct truth ___ and freedom from
examination ___ interest / bias, or the reverse
Perception – result proponent – and to ___ if all important
of our personal d. Re-cross facts ___ upon the issue
senses examination ___
Preparing for cross
opponent
examination:
•Personal knowledge e. Court can ask
except hearsay qualification of • Master the facts
witness
• Make a cross examination
outline

• Do not ask questions w/c


you do not know the answer

• Include just one fact per


question

Evidence is not required:


When there is an admitted
fact

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen