Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
guistics? How about this, “fan-freaking-tastic? If your answer is yes, I owe you for you are
truly rich in vocabulary. Because I myself didn’t really know what this exactly means. For
this is my first time I have encountered this word. Anyway, what makes it more important
now is I am about to learn this by just answering the set of questions at the back of my
mind.
Questions like, where does this word or set of words come from? Who coined this
term? Is it acceptable? Does it have a meaning? Is learning this group of words will give
us learning that can be used in the development one’s awareness in linguistic changes?
If not, why do we need to read and/or study this? Let’s us find its significance!
On the other hand, it has been defined as “the separation of parts of a compound
word by an intervening word or words, used mainly in informal speech for emphasis (e.g.
These archaic words are evident on the study conducted by James Bleeping
McMillan (1980). Additionally, according to the Eberspacher (2018), these group of words
are not new for it existed in the last few decades as exemplified in the writings of H.L
Sources: https://www.omniglot.com/writing/writingvspeech.htm
http://theweek.com/articles/441722/why-linguists-freak-about-absofreakinglutely
https://www.thefreedictionary.com/infixing
2
Kent Hermie A. Marciano Paper no. 2.1 Morphology
EM 204: Structure of English Prof. John Frederick B. Tesoro
Goshdarn Mecken in 1936. To answer the question where it was originated? It was first
However, another proof rose when it was recorded in the writings of the classical
poet George Bernard Shaw in his Pygmalion: Eliza Dolitttle: “Fan-bloody-tastic” or “abso-
poem entitled Richard II, ““How-heinous-ever it be”. Given these examples proved that
these inserted emphatic words have its origin and can still be considered as syntactically
correct.
be that this wouldn’t meet the criteria of a morpheme that is why is it considered as
morphologically unacceptable. This rule states that a morpheme cannot be divided into
remainders.
the way how we construct sentences using phrasal verb. This has been classified as
cutting phrasal verbs, an example of which is the phrasal verb “turn off” can be cut into
two parts by inserting another word, such as “radio,” to form the phrase “turn the radio
off“. In here the meaning of the phrasal verb is retained. In other instances, however, it
modifiers. A good example for this is, “I got forty-bloody-seven /and that’s good e-
Sources: https://www.omniglot.com/writing/writingvspeech.htm
http://theweek.com/articles/441722/why-linguists-freak-about-absofreakinglutely
https://www.thefreedictionary.com/infixing
3
Kent Hermie A. Marciano Paper no. 2.1 Morphology
EM 204: Structure of English Prof. John Frederick B. Tesoro
‘absofreakinglutely’ is something that confuse the readers and language learners and
at the same time challenges them. Challenges the language learners like me to know the
implication and its significance to the language awareness and development of every
individual. Thus, I therefore conclude that every word created either morphologically
coined or not has its true value and essence. Reading this article really made me more
information literate in terms of the newly coined words that create a big impact to the
Sources: https://www.omniglot.com/writing/writingvspeech.htm
http://theweek.com/articles/441722/why-linguists-freak-about-absofreakinglutely
https://www.thefreedictionary.com/infixing