Sie sind auf Seite 1von 9

Mitigating Aggravating Exempting Not MC or AC

1. In crimes against 1. Crimes against Article 332 Parricide


property (Art 332) persons a. Theft Adultery
a. Robbery (Arts 294 - Where: b. Swindling Concubinage
302) a. offended party is a c. Estafa because it is
b. Usurpation (Art 312) relative of a higher degree Not criminal liability therefore not inseparable and
c. Fraudulent than the offender, MC or AC if the offender
inherent in the offense
insolvency (Art 314) b. or where offender and is related to the offended party
d. Arson (Arts 321,322, offended party are as spouse, ascendant,
325,326) relatives of the same line or descendant or if the
c. Not aggravating: when offender is a brother or sister
the offender killed his or brother in law or sister in
brother in law law of the offended party and t
hey are living together.
(Absolutory cause)
(e) Only civil liability Death of victim who is Article 247
committed by relative of a lower degree Less serious physical injuries
Spouses, ascendants, when the crime is Serious physical injuries
descendants, homicide (Art 249) or Where a spouse committed after
or relatives by affinity murder (Art 248) having surprise the offended
in same line; spouse or paramour or mistress
brothers-, sisters- in- committing actual sexual
law intercourse
i. Theft
ii. Swindling
iii. Malicious mischief
Trespass to dwelling 1. Crime against persons
when it is serious
physical injuries
(the offended party is
descendant, whether
illegitimate or legitimate)
2. Less serious physical
injuries if offended party
is relative of higher
degree of the offender
3. Slight physical
injuries - same as b.
Death of victim who is a
step child by a step parent
on the fact that the victim
of crime is a relative of
lower degree, but not
parricide
Other condition Crime against chastity
attending; Acts of lasciviousness
Ex. Where accused (Art 336)
killed his brother in law Rape
in view of conduct Regardless of whether the
pursued by the latter in offender is a relative of a
contracting adulterous higher or lower degree of
relations with the wife the offended party
of the accused; or
Accused, a brother in
law, struck the
deceased, the reason
is to render service to
relative
Qualifying AC.
a. Crime of qualified
seduction where the
victim must be a virgin
and under 18 years of age
b. Qualified seduction if
the offender is the brother
or son of the offended
woman

Intoxication.
Must be proved
"when the offender has committed a felony in a state of intoxication" - the offender's mental faculties must
be affected by drunkenness. Amount of liquor must be of such quantity as to blur the offender's reason and
deprive him of self control.
Mitigating Aggravating
1. If intoxication is not 1. If intoxication is habitual -
habitual - Must be one given to intoxication by
proved by satisfactory excessive use of intoxicating
evidence, in the absence drinks.
of proof to the contrary, it
is presumed to be
unintentional
2. If intoxication is 2. If it is intentional
unintentional - not (subsequent to the plan of
subsequent to the plan committing a felony)
to commit a felony
If the intoxication is Exception - when intoxication
accidental, where the is non habitual but
accused was drunk at subsequent to the plan to
the time of the commit the crime.
commission of the crime
is considered as MC

Degree of instruction and education of the offender.


Mitigating Aggravating
Low degree, absence of, High degree of instruction
or lack of instruction and and education
education
Lack of sufficient Highly intelligent and
intelligence exceptional and mentally
alert
Must be proved positively When the offender is a city
and directly and cannot resident who knows how to
be based on mere sign his name
deduction or inference.
Trial court not the
appellate court to
FIND and CONSIDER
the circumstance of lack
of instruction. When the
trial court did not make
any finding, an appeal
that alternative
circumstance cannot be
considered in fixing the
penalty to be imposed on
the accused
Apply in almost all crimes Crimes against property.
Ex. Robbery with example. Estafa, theft,
homicide; anti-subversion robbery, arson
law; murder; homicide
Not mitigating:
Crimes against chastity.
Eg. Rape and adultery

Treason, Murder
A professional who use his
degree of instruction to take
advantage of it in committing
the crime. Estafa,
falsification, slander, etc.
Exception - lawyer liable for
physical injuries,rape

Note:
Non-habitual intoxication, lack of instruction and obfuscation are not to be taken separately.
One mitigating circumstance and impose the proper penalty in the minimum period.

Categories: Criminal Law 1

Newer Post
Older Post

Search
QUESTIONS?
Name
Email ID

CATEGORIES
Constitutional Law 1
Criminal Law 1
Criminal Law Cases
Haiku Case Digest
Persons and Family Relations
Statutory Construction
Taxation


 Activist Post 
 
 



 Audio Codals 
 
 


 Law and Sexuality 
 
 


 Music Playlist for Study 
 
 


 Phil Jurisprudence 
 
 


About Skinny Cases

Never mind.
View Complete Profile

Life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused
men to make laws in the first place. -Frederic Bastiat

2013 Skinny Cases. Powered by Blogger.

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen