Sie sind auf Seite 1von 2

SERANA VS SANDIGANBAYAN

Facts:

Accused movant charged for the crime of estafa is a government scholar and a student
regent of the University of the Phillipines, Diliman, Quezon City. While in the performance of
her official functions, she represented to former President Estrada that the renovation of the
Vinzons Hall of the UP will be renovated and renamed as Pres. Joseph Ejercito Estrada
Student Hall and for which purpose accused requested the amount of P15,000,000.00.
Petitioner claims that the Sandiganbayan had no jurisdiction over her person because as a UP
student regent, she was not a public officer due to the following: 1.) that being merely a
member in representation of the student body since she merely represented her peers; 2.)
that she was a simple student and did not receive any salary as a UP student regent; and 3.)
she does not fall under Salary Grade 27.The Ombudsman contends that petitioner, as a
member of the BOR is a public officer, since she had the general powers of administration and
exercise the corporate powers of UP. Compensation is not an essential part of public
office.Moreover, the Charter of the University of the Philippines reveals that the Board of
Regents, to which accused-movant belongs, exclusively exercises the general powers of
administration and corporate powers in the university. It is well-established in corporation law
that the corporation can act only through its board of directors, or board of trustees in the case
of non-stock corporations.

Issue:

WON a government scholar and UP student regent is a public officer.

Held:

Yes.

First, Public office is the right, authority, and duty created and conferred by law, by which for a
given period, either fixed by law or enduring at the pleasure of the creating power, an individual
is invested with some portion of the sovereign functions of the government, to be exercise by
him for the benefit of the public. The individual so invested is a public officer. (Laurel vs
Desierto)Delegation of sovereign functions is essential in the public office. An investment in an
individual of some portion of the sovereign functions of the government, to be exercised by him
for the benefit of the public makes one a public officer. Second, Section 4(A)(1)(g) of P.D. No.
1606 explicitly vest the Sandiganbayan with jurisdiction over Presidents, directors or trustees,
or managers of government-owned or controlled corporations, state universities or educational
institutions or foundations. Hence, it is not only the salary grade that determines the jurisdiction
of the Sandiganbayan. As the Sandiganbayan pointed out, the BOR performs functions similar
to those of a board of trustees of a non-stock corporation. By express mandate of law,
petitioner is a public officer as contemplated by P.D. No. 1606 the statute defining the
jurisdiction of the Sandiganbayan. Third, it is well established that compensation is not an
essential element of public office. At most, it is merely incidental to the public office. Hence,
Petitioner is a public officer by express mandate of P.D.No. 1606 and jurisprudence.

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen