DIVISION MEMORANDUM

NoJ~:b s-2017

TO OSDS (ASDS, AO)

cm (Chief, EPS, PSDS, DIC s)
SGOD (Chief, EP S, School Health Section)
Elementary and Secondary School Heads
All others concerned

FROM FLORDE~ZA4--C. GECOBE, PhD., C ESO VI

Officer in Charg~ ~
G
Office of the Schools Division Superintendent

SUBJECT DIVISION SEARCH FOR SCHOOL HEALTH AND NUTRITON

PROGRAM BEST IMPLEMENTER

DATE JULY 04, 2017

1. The School Govemance and Operation Division -School Health and Nutrition will
conduct a search for Health and Nutrition Program Best Implementers of the different health
programs in the whole Schools Division of Nueva Vizcaya. As stipulated in the DepEd order
no. 43 s-2011 "Strengthening the Schoo! Health and Nutrition Programs for the Achievement
of the Education for All (EF A) and Millennium Development Goals (MDGs).

2. As mandate of this office it is appropriate to strengthen the implementation of the

different programs to fully evaluate the effectiveness in the learning process of students and
pupils to improve the health educational system of the department.

3. Be guided with the contested programs which are suitable in the schools that convey
its own goal in the achievement of better quality education.

4. Enclosed are the criteria preliminary evaluation shall start during the month of
September and finally on the month of November, awarding of winners will be this December
during the Division Search of Outstanding Employee Award .

5. For infonnation guidance and compliance.

Rudz/shn
 CRITERIA FOR JUDGING THE BEST IMPLEMENTERS OF SCHOOL CANTEEN 2017
CRITERIA % Points Rating Remarks
1. Structure: 18
a. Presence of school canteen 5
b. Presence of prominent sign age 2
c. Absence of hazardous objects such as uncovered
electrical outlets and wire, sharp and pointed
5
objects in the eating place, rough objects along
pathways, slippery floor
d. Presesnce of ventilation and illumination facilities 4
e. Presence and displayed updated Sanitary Permit 2
2. Facility 20
a. Presence of clean and safe facilities (dining tables,
5
chairs, kitchen, utensils, display racks/cabinets, etc.)
b. Water Supply
c. Presence of Drinking Station in the area 5
d. With certificate of water potability 5
e. Presence of Handwashing Facility 5
3. Food Protection 20
a. Presence of food storage equipment 6
b. Food displayed for sale at least 18 inches above the floor 4
c. Food displayed in well protected cases or cover 5
d. Non-utilization of plastic materials in food wrapping
and packaging 5
4.Wholesomeness of food for sale / Nutritive Value 20
a. Food in generally fresh appearance 5
b. Absence of repacked foods 4
c. Absence of food with incomprehensible label 4
d.Absence of carbonated or soft drinks 7
5. Personnel/ Food Handlers 7
a. All food handlers have an updated health certificate 2
b. Food handlers are wearing clean clothes, hair restrain,
2
food gloves and with well trimmed finger nails .
c. No Walk -in vendors 1
d. Use canteen as laboratory 2
6. Waste Management: 8
a. Presence of clean and covered waste receptacle 3
b. Practicing waste segregation I 2
c. Presence of well-maintained drainage system . 3
7. Administrative Support System: 1
a. 1-2 school policies/programs 2
b. Adherence to the breakdown of proceeds 5
OVER ALL RATING 100
 CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION

DIVISION SEARCH FOR THE

MOST FUNCTlONAl SCHOOL GARDEN

DistrictlSchool: _ _ _,

I
I CRITERIA 1--,-1 ' - ­
SCHOOLS
"--'---'--'-'~----'-,--'---'---r--r---'-----'---'----'-""-"----',......---j

l!1!ursery (15 points) =-r, j-+--+----+---J--t-+----!--t--+--+-- +

~~~ence of seed bed lboxes (2_pL-~s-,-L)_ _ \

'_ b. Presence of varied seedlin S ,3 ris
I c. No. of seedling produced/distributed _=2J:..t=s'-----t--+ · ---!---+-+--+-----!I--+--+-+--+--+--+--t----+-+---+--l
I~d.Presence of Planting Calendar Seasons (2 ts) I ,
e. Use of !n-organic and Systematic Application of i I Ii I I I' !

fertilizers, pesticides, insecticides (2pts)

f. Seed bank with labels (2 pts)
g. Inventory of produced seedlings and
-=m-
I
I II I
!
I~~-!

I
I I ,

I I : I
I111
I
, distribution (2pts)
! 2. Vegetable Production (40 points)
_____ !
l
_ I , ; ~
_
t+!
I

__
I L~_L+---L.
' i __ -L___
1------.1__
~
J
I a. Total Yield in kilograms (8 pts) _ .____ _,_ __I -­ l--+--L . .__ __
, b, Varieties of vegetable planted (8 ~ _____ ~ I 1 I it__, L-I _ : 1_

d. Maxil'£lum utilization of Plant Area (~J?!.S ' ~ _ ---+-W-+- I i I !

1__
e. Technol. ad ted in Gard.enin 8 ts
3. School Feadlflg P ram (10 POints)
. ,! I 1 I , ! I
, I I
I

I [
I i
!
'+' I
a. On record frequency & feeding I I I ! Iii I
I
~ w~th the number?f participants 1L2!~L_
- Withdocumentation and sch€dule~\
I I I i~
~ -l--'
1-1-: tIH
i I I I_.L
;
t4, Composting (10 points) _
I
_1_L
I

~ ! ~ i I I
T . I
I
----+-I .
. !' I I : H
-LL=f=r
U ttt+.
m
a. Technolo adopted I! I I i

5. Re rtingiRacord Keeping (5 points) ~ i ~ I: I ~

I a. Presence of Logbooks ! II I I I Ii ! I' I I
! [visitation, tools, Seed'ing.illj_~_ _ ~_ _ I I -~J+H' I i_I -W--+-LJ-I
~. ~~:::~~~~t!tf!\1
H
'

h6. V~a~Garden
i La~JJil15 points)
pt) --aB%rrf
i r-j Ii:iT~
1-+ I IIII
I
iJI iii i
I a. Layout (10 pts) , I I I I ! I +- I 1- I ~~.,tt=+~
b. Water Supply (2.5 pts) I , i I I ! I i l-+-r-L
, --1----,- --1 ! I
~- c. FenCing(2,5 pts~ --.-J I ! I --I I' ! I l-H--H j I j fTl-H'
~~~~:S;:~So~~~~:~\OOIS ~I' W
~I I I
'I

--=t=FF=
I' i · :I,-_r
W-L-ll--h I rjtl'+,:--1"I,- -i',, ---l I,

_ l_
I'

_ ___ J!.Q.~~!!.tQ!)'_~£l_d acquisition] ______--'-'--_-- - - -'- - _ _ _ _ '------' J

Evaluator.
 Republic of the Philippines
DEPART1\rfENT OF EDUCAT10N
Region 02

SSCHOOLS D1VTSrON OF NUJ:'VA. VIZCAYA

Bay omboTIg

CRITERIA FOR THE BEST SCHOOL-BASED FEEDING IMPLEMENTER

District/School - - -

f- A~ i!~yR1~,i6w!rXt1h:B~~-OF 12f~-ts
;~. --- --.-- .-- --- .--.-----.- ....- -.- ..- - -- . -- --- ~~'-r----~
-I soor~t· Rank~

..- .- .- -.. -- ., -.-- - .---..- ..--t- - --.-..- ~ . _ .j

i \. Validated N utritio~L~~~lIs ofBeneficiaries I l_O~- --__ J..__ .---- - .....- ~I L____._ _

L-:. :..J:J~ated ~ily attendance- _ _._._.__._____~ ~ ____. --------.-- ------t---- - -- -..--.­ J
L-- j . :'C!1001 Work and Fm~ncla! Plan
i 4. Pr~iect Procurement Management Plan &
~)-- ------ L ----------I
I4 ! i !
------1
L____ ___~'y~!e M~nu . ~----- ~--------J------J
I~__ __p'arents
5. Orientation of SBFP & involvement of 3 I,'! i i I . I
.____ _ ___ _- ------.- ----.L---- - - -- .f.-- -1.-- - - - ---1
6. Partnershin with stakeholders ;3 i ' I
i --
I
B~- PROGR~\I MAN-AGEMiNT--- --- ---i-is-------- i . - - - -j
r -----~-Tim~Feeding Started ·- - r - -·------ -~---I
! a. Upon release of fund by SDO is J
I b One week after release i 2
f-.- .----:--..- - - -_.---.---- -- - --------.---..------,---- -,-'---------;

i
I 2. f eedm12 Area i !

I
,
a. Feeding Room! Canteen! H.E. Room
~
I5

i b. Within the Glassroomlinside th~ classroom i 3 .

, 3. Proper StOr:ageo:Cfood suppJy/ inspection r I I

r-'
i report
4. Observance of proper h~'gicnc & sa~itation
II ~--------L
I
--.---
-i
I
i nrocedure 4 i ' !
.C- 5~=2b~!Van~.e of propcrrO"od handling
i
14 ~ -----t---- -- -i
~6: ~roper attire of ~ood ha~dle:s "' 3 I -r==----=--~l -l
l-_~~ ~9- ,~LEMF~NTAR' ACTIVITIES _' 10 ____ .+ ________ __ __ _________.1
L ____..J ·_~hth ~nctlOnal school gardcl , ..~--- 4-·- ---ti --.l1'.. ----..-... ----.- - -.- J
~. 2. Waste segr~gatJ,on & con~tln~ __~__ : 3 i -------t-..- -.----- - - ' I
1-- --- 3. ~o ofbeneftctartes dewormed ji
2 __.___ _ ....L______.. L__ ._ _
r _ _ • LJQUIDA:r~~_PROCESS
D ... . _____ ,2....- , .- -L--- --.-.- I -------i
! 1, Submission of complete liquidation report i ! i
! On time l5 : i I
r
I

L-_
• Late 13
K :~~::~~T·ICF,S/INNO'rA TI()NSI- - -'l~~
,___ ~ _,, _ _ _ ,_ .~ _ _ .. _.~ ... ~ _ _.___
,
I -- -------T·- --~- -·- '- -l
. _., .__.~~ __ ~ _ _..__.1
i
I F. CHANGE IN THE NUTRITIONAL r------r ---r- ­
; STATUS OF BENEFICIARIES
rcRA~1) TOTAL ______ ________ __ _
I.~~%.----l------l-
..---1
I !
1 _ _ _ __
.---1.
--- .-.-~

- '_ __ __ _ __

Name of Evaluator:,_ _ _ _~_ __________ Date:_ _ _ __

 CRITERIA FOR JUDGING THE BEST IMPLEMENTER OF THE NATIONAL DRUG

EDUCATION PROGRAM (NDEP) 2017

Components Assigned Actual

points points
1. Curriculum and Instruction (15)
a. Integration of drug concepts in relevant subject areas 5
classroom
b. Functional action Plan 5
c. Brochures/leaflets 5
2. Co-Curricular Activities and ancillary Services (35)
Presence of
a. Bulletin boards/NDEP corners in the classroom 5
b. Peer counselling program 5
c. Teen drop center/kiosk for teens 5
d. Functional Guidance Office 5
e. Functional school clinic 5
f. Scouting movement/BARKADA KONTRA DROGA(DepEd memo 5
no. 49 s. 2017)
g. functional students organizations 5
3. Teachers Organization (10)
a. NDEP committee is formed with the respective duties and 5
function
b. NDEP coordinators/Guidance counselor/Nurse are trained 5
4. Parent Education and Community outreached (15)
a. Close coordination with the Barangay/Municipal/Provincial 5
Anti- drug Education Council with Private and Religious
Organization
b. Drug Abuse Prevention Education is conducted during PTA 15
meetings
5. Research and Evaluation (25)
a. Action research/ Case study (i.e. anti-smoking, drug awareness
and prevention cases of students/Abuse drugs and its relevance to
Education)

Total Points 100

 Republic of the PtJiippifles
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Regjon02
DIVISION OF NUEVA ~AYA
Bayombong

CRITERIA FOR DIVISION SEARCH OF BEST HERBAL GARDEN

SCHOOL: DISTRICT',
CRITERIA Points Ratio I!:
1. Integration in the lesson plan (Health, Science,
Araling Panlipunan. TLE etc.) 5
2.Presence of 10 herbal medicine plants
accredited by the DOH 40
a Ampalaya
b. Acapulco
c. Bayabas
d. Bawang
e. Lagundi
f. Niyog-niyogan
g. Pancit-pancitan
h. Tsaang Gubat
i. Sambong
j. YerbaBuena
3. Herbal~lants labelled and its usage 10
4. Landscaping
a Wide space with robust complete plants
b. Enough space with robust plants 15
c. Wide but unattended with scattered plants
d. Enough space but unattended with several
plants
5. Write ups and documentation on the usage of
the herbal medicines
a. Testimonies 15
h. Records oftreatment in the School Clinic
c. Presence of fliers or instructional
materials in the School Clinic
6. Best Practices (documentations and samples)
a Production of soaps, decoctions or ointment 15
Total Points 100
 Republic of the Philippines

DEPARTMENT O F EDUCATIO N

Region 02

SCHOOLS DIVISION OF NUEVA VIZCAYA

Bayombong

CRITERIA FOR DIVISION SEARCH OF BEST OARTH IMPLEMENTER

(Daily after Recess Tooth Brushing Habit)

Criteria Points Rating

5

1. Integration to Classroom Progra m

30

2. Presence of functional tooth brushing trough,

presence of toothbrushes/Tb rack/tooth paste
sufficient water supply
20

3. Presence of DARTH record in the

c1assroom(monthly)
30

4. Strict Implementation of the Progra m(daily drill

with documentation)
15

5. Best Practices (sustainability)

100
Total Points