Cornforth Tax Video Notes (see more on www.richardcornforth.

com )
The key to “getting out of the system is simply put them on notice AHEAD OF TIME, and
create a “Good Faith Defense File” in advance of problem later. Te approach is to
conditionally settle this matter”. You approach is to agree with them, don’t fight. But first build
a RECORD of your good faith efforts to get educated answers and have a record of it. This will
likely protect your from the allegation of “willful” failure to file, as you this did this ahead of
time. Willful has to do with actual criminal “evil” intent. How can an intent be criminal when
you openly asked, failed to receive full answers and acted accordingly. All the “sovereign” ways
to getting out of the system fail to do what a couple of simple letters can. It puts the law on your
side. Just ask them to prove it on the record, and you are done.
Key component in any trial is willfulness (look up willful and all the requirements the
plaintiff must prove) PLUS --- Competent Fact Witness is essential or their evidence can be
thrown out without this. When asked anything in an audit, summons, etc, you can then honestly
say with a record in support: I can’t stipulate to something… I have not first-hand knowledge of
unauthenticated material. Simply DO NOT authenticate anything they bring before you. They
want YOU to verify evidence against you...are you kidding? They may say: talk to us and it will
help. Rule#1 Never answer anything, not even the NAME if you can. Ask lots of questions about
where they get authority to speak to you instead. YOU HAVE TO GET THIS.
They require you to volunteer to go into their jurisdiction and move forward.
When their lawyer shows up, ask for the lawyer’s photo ID, their bond, oath of office, and a copy
of their state issued license (not a bar membership card), and ask how did you get in building?
Judge may say “I know him” so you may ask the judge and prosecutor, “so you are working
together”. Yes really do this. Is this supposed to be an impartial proceeding?
Another good question is, what statute says I can represent a trust when I am actually the
beneficiary/executor?
Ask from the beginning who were witnesses who were actually harmed by you, either physically
or by contract? They may likely say The United States or The State of ___, or something. But
that does not make sense since there is no harmed party, or proper contract present, and YOU do
not work for government in the capacity as a “creature of statute”, do you ( ie: a official job
position they created - statutes apply only to them)?
I will not be my own witness. THIS IS KEY. And in tax court you can take this position:
My own self-assessment as required, and it shows I did not earn enough “taxable income”.
“I also looked up the instruction for the 1040 form and found no instructions defining taxable
“income” and in the 1040 instructions how to fill in line 22 of the 1040 form, seems to be
missing. How I am supposed to know what it means? Can you tell me what the instruction says
about line 22 (“total income”)?
I stipulate the attorney will be the witness. Who is going to testify for the other side? An do NOT
let their attorney enter anything that is not authenticated first hand witness information, keep
objecting.
Sequestered witnesses one at a time. Including the agents (they will hate this).
Did you prepare these papers? Can you stipulate to these materials? KEY: you cannot
authenticate any signatures or recognize papers, you are not required to testify against yourself.
Remember, Willfulness is also required in criminal matters.
What is WILLFUL? (ie: criminal intentional, intent to commit a crime)
Proceeding from a conscious motion of the will; intending the result which actually cronies to
pass ; designed; intentional; malicious. A willful differs essentially from a negligent act. The one
is positive and the other negative. Intention is always separated from negligence by a precise line
of demarcation. Sturm v. Atlantic Mut. ins. Co., 38 N. Y. Super. Ct. 317. In common parlance,
“willful” is used in the sense of “intentional,” as distinguished from “accidental” or
“involuntary.” But language of a statute affixing a punishment to acts done willfully may be
restricted to such acts done with an unlawful intent. U.S. v. Boyd (C. C.) 45 Fed. 855; State v.
Clark, 29 N. J. Law, 90.
Recent supreme court decisions have further stated how clear willfulness must be to be
used against you if you acted based on a good faith belief you were doing the right thing.
These letters to follow on the record ahead of time may help.

A Dentist Case ---

Received a 3rd party summons was presented. Motion to quash was done. He required the IRS to
cite it’s actual statutory authority.
Case had to go to appeal. Once you have been "compelled to testify" against yourself, those
records cannot be used. Tried to get ID from the agent, and agent would not provide. Now you
can charge them for violating their own rules. Don’t get too creative – focus on that. Focus on
their defects and law breaking habits (defects), not YOUR errors. Go on offense and tick to
asking questions. Then motion to dismiss.
In the Process of Helping the IRS Determine Your Tax Liability (from one of his course):
you will show up say “I have done my own self-assessment. You find that the tax rates and
tables don’t apply to all income, just “taxable income”. I must have had insufficient taxable
income to warrant a filing. What is a "revenue taxable activity" I was engaged in ((like excise tax
liability, selling firearms, tobacco, alcohol, etc). Ask them to prove it, with someone who can
authenticate the signatures first hand and swear under oath (good luck with that), or it becomes
inadmissible. Case for dismissal for lack of evidence. Don’t you dare provide anything.

26 CFR 1.862.8 - Method to calculate taxable income, from sources within or without US, etc
If they ask for an amount that is more than the actual amount due, say “prove it” (they are
always asking for ore that is due if it is more than ZERO). But they never define what “income”
is from which to calculate those taxes?
Tax court is plenary court; court of last resort to re-determine your tax bill = final. This is an
opportunity to make your case and get them off you for good. A bunch of state/ Non US Citizen
like paperwork means nothing. Once you set your record, they never be prosecute you for that
tax bill, that year. again.
Once they send letters, ALWAYS send them back something - soon.
If you default by not replying back with clear answers (vs their fraudulent standard frivolous
curve balls), go for an administrative judgment. Administrative process works both ways. It
becomes great evidence I your favor down the road. So simply agree with them and begin a
process of settling. You effectively do it their way, but you are setting them up.
So do a self-assessment, which is your testimony and final unless they can refute is (they really
can't).
It is a Self Assessment tax system. Self assessment is voluntary... not all voluntary. So go ahead
self-assess and submit it and see if they can rebut you liability being ZERO due, as it applies to
you.
Income from within the US - see IRS own definitions mean the territories and DC. When they
say “States (uppercase) it again refers to the territories and DC AGAIN in their circular logic
(not the several union states). Remember, self-assessment is voluntary. Payment is of tax due is
not voluntary.

Source of Duty = Cause of Damages - A key in your defense. They must prove what the
source of your DUTY is.
If you are a “creature of statute” (likely not), thus you would then have a duty and thus earn a
revenue taxable activity. Since we are clearly not a creature of statute, but a natural person
instead (vs sovereign, man, living man and all of that), you likely have no duty to perform under
an unspecified statute, and therefore are not engaged in revenue taxable activity. DONE.
Am I a creature of statute? Not likely. I am a creature of God but not man’s government. If not
a creature of the state, may not apply. To enforce tax collection requires statute, this is THEIR
RULES do use this. Keep asking - what is the statute AND enforcement regulation that says I
have a duty, exactly which one (not the general 7201 they quote), it has to say what they can
do to you – a private American?
Find out what is relevant... “Taxable Income”. Tax rates and tables APPLY. BUT what is the
source? Any document THEY bring must be authenticated (sworn under oath). So do NOT
authentic anything for them, or even recognizing anything they show you as being from you.
The key...Go with an offer – if they can show you the duty to pay, you will. Tell them you have
done own self-assessment and found I didn't have enough to file. Show the papers you did as
outlined in his course. My self-assessment is authenticated (sworn affidavit). Notarized. This
is all you have to offer, now they have to rebut it, and can’t
This IS authenticated evidence, and all you will do. Proof of claim is now proven with sworn
testimony, where is theirs?
In an administrative proceeding court. The party who takes the burden of proof on themselves,
and has supported. THEY have the burden of proof backed by testimony, and authenticated
evidence has proven their claim. THESE are the needed facts. THERE is the evidence.
In an Administrative Court - the party that takes the burden of proof upon themselves and has
supported it with sworn testimony in authenticated evidence has proved their claim for which
relief can be granted (it is un-disputable). The judge cannot change that in an administrative
court record. The facts are now true. I had insufficient taxable income to warrant filing, and that
stand as unrebutted.
Regulations are written only for IRS agents who are “creatures of statute” (they got title
from the government who created them). Take this position vs the whole strawman nonsense.
Use Their language for the same thing. It’s in their laws and rulings. They will take you more
seriously. Also, an unpublished regulation, has LIMITED application for whom it was written.
Regulations are for agents, code are for agents and creatures of statute (not everybody). If
not published, they don't apply to us, there is no duty. If in federal registry it only applies to
certain people (likely not you). Also note CFR 26.1-1 is supposed the regulation that talks
about citizens etc who can then enforce against, however there is not condition for that in Title
26…a regulation with no statue behind is of NO force or effect. It is void an unlawful for them
to use it. BANK – even more deception and fraud you catch them at.
IRS Codes are Internal and NOT published in Federal registry. Don't use 1040, but do a self-
assessment instead and make them rebut it your written assessment and go away. THIS is how
you get “STATUS” in their eye. Beat them so they want to leave you alone.

26 CFR 1.861-8 sources of taxable income from within...Class of gross income MAY consist of
one of the sources on the list. It does not clearly show you are in a Revenue Taxable
“Activity” in this section. They would have to bring proof and evidence of fraud in your
testimony. They must bring a high standard of authenticated first hand proof. They must show
clear and convincing evidence to change your numbers (belief).
Anything they bring MUST be authenticated under oath by some competent man or woman, or
it is VOID (voidable), so object to every time they try to use it without someone who has first
hand knowledge. Make sure you don't testify to anything or authenticate anything they give you
to testify to. For example, they bring docs or boxes of stuff to “stipulate to”. Say, “I cannot verify
or stipulate any of that. THIS IS KEY. They are counting on you to stipulate to it. YOU are the
only fact based witness they can really get about document and signatures.
No sworn witness = no evidence = no case = no jurisdiction = must be dismissed.
IDEA - FILE returns with an affidavit using notary as authenticated evidence. Send to IRS
Commissioner.
File a Claim or Complaint with the Commissioner and Treasury Inspector General for the agent’s
bonds.
Take yourself out of the system letter... Way easier than going down the rabbit hole of the
patriot movement and these documents are you good faith defense.
By composing a letter to you senators,congressman, IRS commissioner, Treasury Secretary,
Chief counsel IRS, US Attorney general, Agents you are dealing with, Secretary of State (birth
state), etc EVERYONE you can think of that makes sense to you.
John Doe
123 Anywhere Street
Rural route 98607
Anytown, Washington-state
Zip Code Exempt
December ___, 2018
John Koskinen, Commissioner Certified mail# ____________________ (return receipt)
Office of the Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service
1111 Constitution Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20224-0002
And to: Assistant Attorney General, Tax Division Certified mail# ________________
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20530-0001
Etc And
(US Treasury and the Treasury out of Puerto Rico).
RE: The estate of JOHN HENRY DOE ending in xxx-xx-1234
I John Henry Doe, declare that is not nor is it ever my intention to avoid paying any
obligation that I/we lawfully owe. In accordance with the Freedom of Information Act and
in order that I can perform a revised voluntary assessment, and pay income taxes to the
extent that I am able, please review the following assertions….

(**I am not asking you to interpret anything, give legal advice, nor am I “protesting” anything
or making frivolous statements, I am merely just asking you to tell me what it actually says).
1. Found at 26 USC 1 – The tax rates and table do not apply to (see attached list of items
found there), but only apply to “taxable income” found there, correct?** Y / N

2. Tell me what is says at CFR 26 1.861-1. Does it SAY what is to be used to determine
“taxable income”? Y / N - And is there a statute that backs this regulation up clearly
relating to whom it applies, if so please provide it?

3. Does it provide at IRM 9.1.2.1, (that ties IRS authority to enforce revenue laws) say it
derives from statute**? Y / N
4. Does it say that people are required through distrains, threats, and even fines and threats
of imprisonment to pay “1040 taxes”**? Please specify exactly where.

5. Does is SAY at 26 USC 1040 that the 1040 tax is an “excise tax” on the privilege of
transferring qualified property to a qualified heir? If I am a decedent, how can I file a
1040 return or be liable for said related codes**? What does it say? Y / N

6. Tell me if you agree with Justice Scalia, who clarified that the Supreme court legislative
says, what is means and means what is says...in the Zedner case. Y / N

7. Where are the “citizenship” definitions found in CFR 26 1-1.1, when in fact Title 26
statutes does it spell out the citizenship issues? In other words, are those regulations
adding or extending beyond the statute in any way regarding the use of “citizenship”, if
so what statute is that?

8. Does it say in Section 83 (IRC) that effectively income is based on the gain on property
(indicating my labor is property)? How is “gain”/income to be defined or calculated?
Is it the gross minus the costs (which for me would be the same number)?

9. I reviewed the IRS instructions from form 1040, line 22, “total income”. However, in the
1040 manual there are instruction for all line items. But then I find no instructions
explaining what line 22 means there, what is the baseline number determining if I have
any tax liability, or a duty to those codes, to even file? Please show me where instructions
for line 22 are, total income went?

10. In searching for what line 22 must mean, I found at Title 31 Section 321(d)2, regarding
what “income” is, does it say?: For purposes of the Federal income, estate, and gift
taxes, property accepted under paragraph (1) shall be considered as a gift or bequest to
or for the use of the United States. So is Federal income a gift? Yes __ or No ___

11. Does it say at 26 U.S. Code § 6331 - Levy and distraint :

If any person liable to pay any tax neglects or refuses to pay the same within 10 days
after notice and demand, it shall be lawful for the Secretary to collect such tax (and such
further sum as shall be sufficient to cover the expenses of the levy) by levy upon all
property and rights to property (except such property as is exempt under section 6334)
belonging to such person or on which there is a lien provided in this chapter for the
payment of such tax. Levy may be made upon the accrued salary or wages of any officer,
employee, or elected official, of the United States, the District of Columbia, or any
agency or instrumentality of the United States or the District of Columbia, by serving a
notice of levy on the employer (as defined in section 3401(d)) of such officer, employee,
or elected official. If the Secretary makes a finding that the collection of such tax is in
jeopardy, notice and demand for immediate payment of such tax may be made by the
Secretary and, upon failure or refusal to pay such tax, collection thereof by levy shall be
lawful without regard to the 10-day period provided in this section.
 THEREFORE, what evidence exists that any of the condition above applied to
me prior to investigations, searches, or seizure of any property? Wouldn’t there be an
obvious lack of jurisdiction to proceed at all from the beginning? How did the IRS obtain
Lawful Notices of Liens and Levy’s on my property? Further how did the IRS agent use
these events prior to investigation for further charges as evidence to gain jurisdiction,
when they knew in advance their authority did not apply? Are omissions, misleading
statements, and perjury a fraud subjecting the agents to various criminal charges? Be
aware, 26 USC 7214 and 18 USC 241, and 18 USC 242 may apply.
12. How does the tax code apply to Private Americans, and where is this found?
For the permanent record, I declare (make this your own) I am a living, breathing man, a
natural person, not creature of statute, and not a deceased person. I declare that I am not now do I
intend to ever be the estate representative or trustee of the decedent. Therefore, I am not nor
have ever to my best knowledge engageding in revenue taxable activity or having sufficient
taxable income to file or fall under those regulations. I cannot possibly file a form 1040, nor be
liable for such a “1040 tax” or related statutes, even if erroneously submitted in the past while
trying to interpret the not understood codes as accurately as possible, but did so based on good
faith and belief at that time, even if erroneous. I cannot be found to willful for not filing, working
in good faith to resolve these issues, or required perform a duty that is in serious questions.
Certainly, there is no willful intent to not pay or file what is actually due, or do things wrong in
attempts to offer remedies to correct these problems in the past, in my search for the proper ways
to address this matter based on my good faith understanding with no criminal intent. Therefore, I
rescind and revoke previous erroneous filings or offers, and including associated signatures
which may have been induced under threat, duress, and coercion (I also submitted a similar
withdrawal for fraud in 2014 in attempts to resolve this and protect my rights). I have made
multiple good faith efforts to verify and correct any alleged debt the IRS claims is due, which
obviously does not apply to me, a non-creature of statute.
30 days from your receipt, your failure to respond with complete answers, will be deemed your
confession and acquiescence and thus declares your agreement that tax tables apply only to
“taxable income”, and that you agree that the method used to determine taxable income as found
at Section 83 regarding gains on property (which I understand labor to be property exchanged for
services), and as found at CFR 26-1.861-8, that the 1040 tax is a death tax, a person cannot be
required to file “1040 tax” unless they are an estate representative.

Therefore, it my reason and belief, that I have not become liable for those related statutes or tax
duties regarding said income tax of that nature, nor would one be liable to any other known
“duty” under similar Title 26 codes, as a result of such filings performed under threat, duress, or
coercion and under such confusing circumstances, or otherwise. This matter would also apply to
my non-working wife, a living man and woman (as agent/beneficiary for JANE HENRY DOE).
She is not to blame for any such matters as she has a language barrier and relies solely on my for
dealing with such matters.
An agreement and trust is formed by your silence and acquiescence. You or your agency has full
authority to set off and settle any alleged liabilities as trustee for this account, as directed my me,
the beneficiary. Therefore, any tax debt alleged as a result of previous erroneous good faith
affidavits in the form of 1040 filings or otherwise, would then establish the requirement to cease
and desist collection efforts, withdraw claim for remaining amounts claimed due, and to return
any levied property over the past 10 years, adjust accounting accordingly, and release therefore
any liens on property or amounts indicated are owed, which IRS or Department of Treasury has
claimed.
Although it seems apparent that a 1040 may not have never been required in my case, and
amended and corrected (not false) forms and information returns have been resubmitted TWICE
to assist the IRS in re- determining taxes due bases on recalculations of what “income” I
discovered was erroneously submitted before. This amendments were in fact my good faith
Affidavit as a corrected Self-Assessment. No rebuttal to this fact was ever made. I have never
received accounting responses or adjustments for those affidavits for the adjustment of
previously incorrectly understood and erroneously reported based on good faith and belief,
perhaps under bad advice, as “taxable income”.
I consider the previous non-answer to my claims as silence is acquiescence to the revised
calculations in those affidavits. These Affidavits significantly alter the outcome of final numbers
being collected, yet two levy collection efforts and liens have continued regardless of verifying
the accounting as requested, including the armed seizure of assets in our home, based on agents
while exceeding their congressionally delegated authority at the time, which constitutes several
Federal Crime under 26 USC 7214 Title 18 USC.
These continued collection actions are clear violations of your fiduciary duty, equate extortion
under color of law, and violate requirements of due process, after jurisdiction and due process
was requested. Other documents sent via the mail are also considered mail fraud. Several offers
and verification of debt were ignored and not rebutted. Even if I never correctly responded to
earlier collection actions, the lack of jurisdiction in the first place would still require
consideration of those adjustments. The ongoing collection activity is a clear violation of the
FDCPA using the US mail service, as well and trespass at common law, as well.
I look forward to your detailed response and shall assist in arrangements for return of my
property immediately.
Regarding filings relating to revenue taxable activity or income using 1040’s for tax years 2013,
2014, 2015, 2016, and 2017, I am awaiting your instructions upon answering the above
questions, so I can best determine how to do so lawfully as the constitution or clear contract may
require. This is my good faith effort to obtain such direction, as it always has been in the past.
This is about:
Qualifications
Bonds
Oath
Authority
--------------------------
After 30 days you can follow up with….(optional but a good ideas for your record)
Dated this _____ Day of December 2015
Pleaser reply via Notary Acceptor for the Record, no later than 30 day after receipt of the first
letters you sent.
Respond via Notary Acceptor:
Dan James, Notary Acceptor
123 Anywhere Street
Boise, ID 97201

COMPLAINT TO COMMISSIONER and LEGAL COUNSEL (Named).

(make this yours, be sure the facts line up) I sent the attached twice provided corrected returns as
an amended affidavit, based on my own voluntary self-assessment, after determining what
taxable income applies to my situation. These were filed on ________ and again on
______________ with no response while collection activity continued.
I have received no formal response to those affidavits addressing the findings of these returns,
yet collection activities, levies’ and liens have gone forward without any consideration or offer
of due process. Agents have exceeded their authority and breached their fiduciary duty, based on
the following.
- No presentation of a bond or delegation of authority upon request.
- Ignoring my presentments and affidavits regarding these corrected filings, then engaging
in armed levy and seizure actions.
- No accounting adjustments based on the submitted affidavits.
- Unrebutted affidavits stands as fact if not disputed. These are in fact undisputed.
- Inquiries asking legitimate question about the nature of “taxable income “ they are
collecting and more.
- Damages have been incurred affecting ability to earn income and sustain family.
- I have made a determination of sources of income, as a result the numbers changes
according to my findings. Taxable income from a privilege granted by the United States.
YADA YADA.
I have tried many methods and communications to resolve this issue in good faith. Consider this
complaint the final attempt to exhaust administrative remedies prior to an action. Consider this
my formal administrative complaint to the Commissioner office in accordance with your duty to
26 USC 7433.
I, also expect return of all property taken since the 2005 returns in question and compensation for
emotional and financial harm of no less than $1,000,000.
I do not accept and expect no further retaliatory collection activities that apparently are underway
in this matter.
Sincerely

Last, First-Middle
as agent/beneficiary for ALL CAPS NAME (agency ID# 555-66-7777)

Last, First-Middle
as agent/beneficiary for ALL CAPS NAME (agency ID# 555-66-7777)

Certificate of service attached to each.

John A. DiCicco
Assistant Attorney General, Tax Division
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20530-0001
John Koskinen, Commissioner Certified mail# ______________________
Office of the Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service
1111 Constitution Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20224-0002

FOIA Division
Treasury..US and Puerto Rico
IRS agent (local) and their manager.

When they fail to answer these 2 letters, they becomes a Good Faith Defense file, and
represents an estoppel to even approaching you to pay a tax, or charge you with anything, as
you have eliminated willfulness. Worrying about patriot issues with licenses, having a mailing
and addresses, using zip codes, citizenship, etc is irrelevant is will be ignored or used against
you. Use the law instead. Creating this written record is powerful. Now it is your belief based on
THEIR actions or failure to act as required. This becomes and estoppel enpies.

Tipping point letter shorter version of first letter above

Date
Addressees etc
SUBJECT: Good Faith Questions I require an Answer To
I John Henry Doe, declare that is not nor is it ever my intention to avoid paying any
obligation that I/we lawfully owe. In accordance with the Freedom of Information Act and
in order that I can perform a revised voluntary assessment, and pay income taxes to the
extent that I am able, please review the following assertions….
To proceed I require answers to the following, to be signed under penalty of perjury: in order
that I may cooperate more effectively and pay tax on any “Taxable Income”. Further, I require
the follow answers...made under the Freedom of Information Act and in accordance with the
duties of any public official as a trustee for the public trust.

1. What is the law requiring private Americans to file and pay and income tax?
2. What is your regulatory authority and delegated authority to address one of the People?

3. What is the law which made the IRS part of the Constitution?
4. How and where do I review the agent’s oath of office, and bond (list agent names)?

5. Where is the contract with both party signatures on it?

6. After reviewing what is “Taxable Income” in your Title 26, please swear under oath that
I, a Private American, as one of the people” have received “taxable income” from
privileged source of “taxable income”?
Be advised, if any of these are unanswered or are simply dismissed as frivolous or some other
common excuse, it shall stand as your silence, and therefore your knowing willing, consent and
agreement that no authority exists to place liens or levies. These are legitimate questions I
require answered to proceed.
Failing to answer leaves us with no choice to file a suit in Federal Court of Record as criminal
violations of Title 18 in various forms, to demand these answers and more under discovery rules.
It might be in your best interest to simply refund the entire amounts seized since 2005, and end
this matter now. Therefore, I order all funds seized for the tax years in dispute.
Since an oath of office by any ‘public official’ is their swearing to uphold and protect the right of
the People, we accept their oath of office and bonds into the matter at hand, and notice you that
these officials are bound to honor their oaths and stop attacking us. We also require production
of all agent’s public hazard bond and the location of offices where claims are to be made. We are
not bound to respond to anyone who has no oath of office, and operating without a bond
confirms, which further establishes my right to sue all parties personally.
Let this act as you notice to sue for exceeding your authority. You have 14 days to respond
in full with complete answers or coordinate return of all property in question.
Your Oath of Office limits those who are in the biz of confiscating our rights and freedoms.
 Sincerely,

xxx a man, one of the People

Beneficiary for JOHN HENRY DOE

Notice Setting Case for Trial

Can you sue IRS for violation of collection procedures guidelines? Of course.
26 USC 7433 - File an administrative complaint with commissioner, asking them to and
compensate you.
Sue for harassment because they have confused us with a decedent. We keep getting demand to
pay a 1040 tax. It is impossible to file. I am not dead. Tell the cease and desist and punish them,
and compensate me.
It is Fraudulent inducement. To send me something requiring a 1040 form. Then claim
something is due. Type of tax 1040.
Tort Claims - Liens - remove - must sure you in Federal court and reduce assessment to
judgment. It must state the type of Tax owed.
Domestic terrorism applies
False presentment of deadly force if they touch their gun.
- need an affidavit explaining why they touched their gun.
- see police manual,
Emotional harm and anguish
7433 for the liens? Copy of credit report, if shows a lien? There is a provision in consumer law,
you can challenge that and THEY must show you the court of law that has judgment... sue for
FCRA violations.
Strategy form?
Property Taxes - File a Tort claim against state - for fraud in connection with collection of
property taxes. Warning - do not bring up constitutionality. Gold or silver is usually required,
motion for declaratory judgment. What has legislature of Oregon determined and enacted in
statute the state can accept as payment or a debt?
If not a currency is defined, under constitutional requirements (Article 1 section 10), you have no
means to know how to pay? What is the substance that I must pay? Keep asking this in follow up
letters, as Offers to pay upson proof of what is mandatory under the constitution?
If you can’t tell me, according to constitution, only gold or Silver, then everything they have
taken was taken in fraud.