Sie sind auf Seite 1von 36

CLASSIFICATION OF RESPONDENTS BASED ON THEIR AGE

TABLE 4.1
Valid Cumulative
Aspects Frequency Percent Percent Percent
V 25 to 30 23 46.0 46.0 46.0
a 35 to40 17 34.0 34.0 80.0
above 45 10 20.0 20.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0
d

Sources: Primary data


The above table 4.1) Indicates most of the respondents that is 80% fall
under the age group between 35-0 yrs, 46% of the respondents are between 25-
30 yrs, 20% of the respondents are between above 45 years respectively
CLASSIFICATION OF RESPONDENTS BASED ON THEIR GENDER

TABLE 4.2
Cumulative
Aspects Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Sources: MALE 38 76.0 76.0 76.0 Primary
FEMALE 12 24.0 24.0 46.0

data Total 50 100.0 100.0

The above table (4.2) Indicates that the majority of the respondents 76%

were male, followed by female 2% in the terms of gender.


CLASSIFICATION OF RESPONDENTS BASED ON THEIR
QUALIFICATION

TABLE 4.3
Cumulative
Aspects Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Source: Primary
V B.E 20 40.0 40.0 40.0
data a M.E 6 12.0 12.0 52.0
l A.M.E 7 14.0 14.0 66.0
It i D.M.E 17 34.0 34.0 100.0 is clear
d Total 50 100.0 100.0
from the above table (4.3) that majority of the respondents or B.E 40% followed

by under DME 34%, A.M.E 14% and M.E.12%

CLASSIFICATION OF RESPONDENTS BASED ON THEIR


DESIGNATION
TABLE 4.4
Valid Cumulative
Aspects Frequency Percent Percent Percent
OFFICER 5 10 10 10
DEPUTYMANAGE 4 8 8 18.0
R
TECHNICAL 14 28 28 46.0
OTHERS 27 54 54 100
TOTAL 50 100 100
Sources: Primary data

The above table (4.4) shows that respondents are designation. A

maximum 54% of the respondents are others, 28% of the respondents are

technical 10% of the respondents are officer, and the remaining 8% of the

respondents are deputy manager.

CLASSIFICATION OF RESPONDENTS BASED ON THEIR

EXPERIENCE
TABLE 4.5
Frequenc Valid Cumulative

ASPECTS y Percent Percent Percent


V BELOW 1YEAR 6 12.0 12.0 12.0
1-3 YEAR 14 28.0 28.0 40.0
a 5-8YEAR 14 28.0 28.0 68.0
ABOVE 15 YEARS 16 32.0 32.0 100.0
l Total 50 100.0 100.0
i

d
Sources: Primary data

The above table (4.5) indicates that most of the respondents were having

years of experience above 15 yrs 32%, followed by 1-3 yrs and 5-8 yrs 28%,

and very few from below 1 year with 12%.

CLASSIFICATION OF RESPONDENTS BASED ON THEIR


SATISFACTION LEVEL

TABLE 4.6
Valid Cumulative
ASPECTS Frequency Percent Percent Percent
V STRONGLY AGREE 12 24.0 24.0 24.0
a AGREE 20 40.0 40.0 64.0
NEUTRAL 13 26.0 26.0 90.0
DISAGREE 5 10.0 10.0 100.0
d Total 50 100.0 100.0

Sources: Primary data

The above table (4.6) reveals the satisfaction level of the respondents. A

maximum 40% of the respondents are agree and 26% of the respondents are

neutral and 24% of the respondents are strongly agree and remaining 10% of the

respondents are disagree.

CLASSIFICATION OF RESPONDENTS BASED ON THEIR


JOB SATISFACTION

TABLE 4.7
Valid Cumulative
ASPECTS Frequency Percent Percent Percent
V STRONGLY AGREE 20 40.0 40.0 40.0
a AGREE 26 52.0 52.0 92.0
DIS AGREE 4 8.0 8.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0
d

Sources: Primary data

The above table (4.7) indicates that most of the respondents of job

satisfaction to 52% of agree and followed by 40% strongly agree and remaining

8% of disagree.

CLASSFICATION OF RESPONDENTS BASED ON THEIR

CO-WORKER

TABLE 4.8
Valid Cumulative
ASPECTS Frequency Percent Percent Percent
V YES 49 98.0 98.0 98.0
a NO 1 2.0 2.0 100.0
l Total 50 100.0 100.0
i
d

Sources: Primary data

The above table 4.8) from the above table it is inferred that 98% good
relationship and 2% of respondents co – workers.

CLASSIFICATION OF RESPONDENTS BASED ON THEIR

ENTERTAINMENT

TABLE 4.9
Sources: Valid Cumulative Primary
ASPECTS Frequency Percent Percent Percent
data V YES 12 24.0 24.0 24.0
a NO 38 76.0 76.0 100.0
l Total 50 100.0 100.0
i
d
The above table (4.9) from the above table it is inferred that 98% good
relationship and 2% of respondents co – workers.

CLASSIFICATION OF RESPONDENTS BASED ON THEIR


GOOD REALATION

TABLE 4.10
Valid Cumulative
ASPECTS Frequency Percent Percent Percent
V YES 39 78.0 78.0 78.0
a NO 11 22.0 22.0 100.0
l Total 50 100.0 100.0
i
d

Sources: Primary data


The above table (4.10) inferred that 76% of the respondents to company

and 24% of the respondents to entertainment.

CLASSIFICATION OF RESPONDENTS BASED ON THEIR

LABOUR TURNOVER

TABLE 4.11
Valid Cumulative
ASPECTS Frequency Percent Percent Percent
V YES 27 54.0 54.0 54.0
a NO 23 46.0 46.0 100.0
l Total 50 100.0 100.0
i
d
Source: Primary data

From the above table (4.11) inferred that 54% of the respondents to job

satisfaction and 46% of the respondents to reduce labour turnover.

CLASSIFICATION OF RESPONDENTS BASED ON THEIR

WORK TIME

TABLE 4.12
Valid Cumulative
ASPECTS Frequency Percent Percent Percent
V ROUTINE WORK 24 48.0 48.0 48.0
a TIREDNESS 15 30.0 30.0 78.0
l LESS PRODUCTIVITY 11 22.0 22.0 100.0
i Total 50 100.0 100.0
d

Source: Primary data

The above (4.12) indicates that most of the respondents that is 48%

ballunder the work time between routine work, 22% of the respondent are less

productivity, 30% of the respondents are tiredness.

CLASSIFICATION OF RESPONDENTS BASED ON THEIR

JOB SECURITY

TABLE 4.13
Valid Cumulative
ASPECTS Frequency Percent Percent Percent
V HIGHLY SATISFIED 36 72.0 72.0 72.0
a LESS SATISFIED 14 28.0 28.0 100.0
l Total 50 100.0 100.0
i
d

Source: Primary data

It is clear from the above table (4.13) that majority of the respondents or

36% highly satisfied and followed by 28% of less satisfied

CLASSIFICATION OF RESPONDENTS BASED ON THEIR

JOB SATISFACTION

TABLE 4.14
Valid Cumulative
ASPECTS Frequency Percent Percent Percent
VREGULAR ATTENDENCE 10 20.0 20.0 20.0
a GOOD RELATIONSHIP 16 32.0 32.0 52.0
l PRODUCTION 15 30.0 30.0 82.0
i TRAINING 9 18.0 18.0 100.0
d Total 50 100.0 100.0

Sources: Primary data

The above table (4.14) indicates that most of the respondents were having

job satisfaction 32% of the respondents to good relationship and 30% of the

respondents to production, and 20% of the respondents to regular attendance,

and 18% of the respondents to training.

CLASSIFICATION OF RESPONDENTS BASED ON THEIR

SATISFACTION LEVEL

TABLE 4.15
Cumulative
ASPRCTS Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
VHEALTHY INTERACTION 22 44.0 44.0 44.0
a ENTERTAINMENT 12 24.0 24.0 68.0
l TRAINING 16 32.0 32.0 100.0
i Total 50 100.0 100.0
d
Source: Primary data

Above table [4.15] indicates that most of the respondents were having

satisfaction level 44% of the respondents to healthy interaction, and 32% of the

respondents to training, and 24% of the respondents to entertainment.

CLASSIFICATION OF RESPONDENTS BASED ON THEIR

CONSIDER FOR JOB SATISFACTION

TABLE 4.16
Valid Cumulative
ASPRCTS Frequency Percent Percent Percent
V SALARY 12 24.0 24.0 24.0
a FREEDOM OF 16 32.0 32.0 56.0
l PARTICIPATION
MOTIVATION 17 34.0 34.0 90.0
i WELFARE SCHEMES 5 10.0 10.0 100.0
d Total 50 100.0 100.0
Source: Primary data

Above table [4.16] indicates that most of the respondents were having

consider for job satisfaction 34% of the respondents to motivation, and 32% of

the respondents to freedom of participation, and 24% of the respondents to

salary and 10% of welfare schemes.

CLASSIFICATION OF RESPONDENTS BASED ON THEIR


MEDICAL

TABLE 4.17
Cumulative
ASPRCTS Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
V SALARY 11 22.0 22.0 22.0
a FREEDOM OF 9 18.0 18.0 40.0
l PARTICIPATION
i MOTIVATION 11 22.0 22.0 62.0
d WELFARE SCHEMES 19 38.0 38.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0
Source: Primary data

Above table [4.17] indicates that most of the respondents were having

medical facilities 38% of the respondents to welfare schemes and 22% of

respondents to salary and motivation, 18% of the respondents to freedom of

participation.

CLASSIFICATION OF RESPONDENTS BASED ON THEIR


FINISH YOUR WORK
TABLE 4.18
Cumulative
ASPRCTS Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
V MOST OF THE TIME 9 18.0 18.0 18.0
a SOMETIMES 25 50.0 50.0 68.0
l ALWAYS 13 26.0 26.0 94.0
i NEVER 3 6.0 6.0 100.0
d Total 50 100.0 100.0
Source: Primary data

Above table [4.18] indicates that most of the respondents were having

over stay 50 % of the respondents to sometimes, 32% of the respondents to

always and 14% of the respondents to most of time.

CLASSIFICATION OF RESPONDENTS BASED ON THEIR


PRIORITY

TABLE 4.19
Valid Cumulative
ASPRCTS Frequency Percent Percent Percent
V CAREER 15 30.0 30.0 30.0
a HEALTH 14 28.0 28.0 58.0
l FAMILY 17 34.0 34.0 92.0
i WEALTH 4 8.0 8.0 100.0
d Total 50 100.0 100.0

Source: Primary data

Above table [4.19] indicates that most of the respondents were having

pruesities 34% of the respondents to family, and 30% of the respondents to

career, and 28% of the respondents to health, and 8% of the respondents to 8%.

CLASSIFICATION OF RESPONDENTS BASED ON THEIR


HEALTH

TABLE 4.20
Valid Cumulative
ASPRCTS Frequency Percent Percent Percent
V STRONGLY AGREE 7 14.0 14.0 14.0
a AGREE 27 54.0 54.0 68.0
l DISAGREE 16 32.0 32.0 100.0
i Total 50 100.0 100.0
d

Source: Primary Data

From the above table [4.20] indicates that most of the respondents to

having health suffering 54% of the respondents to agree, and 32% of the

respondents to disagree and 14% of the respondents to strongly agree.

CLASSIFICATION OF RESPONDENTS BASED ON THEIR

TRANSPORT

TABLE 4.21
Valid Cumulative
ASPRCTS Frequency Percent Percent Percent
V YES 31 62.0 62.0 62.0
a NO 19 38.0 38.0 100.0
l Total 50 100.0 100.0
i
d
Source: Primary Data

From the above table 4.21] indicates most of the respondents to were

transport facilities 38% of the respondents to no and 31% of the respondents to

the satisfied company.

CLASSIFICATION OF RESPONDENTS BASED ON THEIR AGE

4.1
CLASSIFICATION OF RESPONDENTS BASED ON THEIR GENDER
4.2
CLASSIFICATION OF RESPONDENTS BASED ON THEIR
QUALIFICATION
4.3
CLASSIFICATION OF RESPONDENTS BASED ON THEIR
DESIGNATION
4.4

CLASSIFICATION OF RESPONDENTS BASED ON THEIR


SATISFACTION LEVEL

4.5
CLASSIFICATION OF RESPONDENTS BASED ON THEIR
JOB SATISFACTION
4.7
CLASSFICATION OF RESPONDENTS BASED ON THEIR
CO-WORKER

4.8

CLASSIFICATION OF RESPONDENTS BASED ON THEIR


ENTERTAINMENT

4.9
CLASSIFICATION OF RESPONDENTS BASED ON THEIR
LABOUR TURNOVER

4.11

CLASSIFICATION OF RESPONDENTS BASED ON THEIR

WORK TIME

4.12
CLASSIFICATION OF RESPONDENTS BASED ON THEIR

JOB SECURITY
4.13

CLASSIFICATION OF RESPONDENTS BASED ON THEIR

JOB SATISFACTION
4.14
CLASSIFICATION OF RESPONDENTS BASED ON THEIR
FINISH YOUR WORK
4.15
CLASSIFICATION OF RESPONDENTS BASED ON THEIR
HEALTH

4.16
CLASSIFICATION OF RESPONDENTS BASED ON THEIR

TRANSPORT

4.17

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen