Untitled http://www.chemteam.info/Chem-History/Noddac...

On Element 93
DR. IDA NODDACK

Zeitschrift fur Angewandte Chemie,

Volume 47, p. 653 (September, 1934)

This article was translated from German by H. G. Graetzer.

About four months ago an article was published in this journal dealing with the
missing elements in the periodic table.1 At the end of that article the possibility
of discovering transuranic elements (that is, elements beyond uranium in the
periodic table) was discussed. A few weeks later it was reported, first in the
newspapers and then also in technical journals, that two scientists, Professor
Fermi in Rome and Mr. Koblic in Joachimsthal, independently had discovered
the element with atomic number 93.

We wish to consider first the work of Fermi.2 Fermi investigated the possibility
of induced radioactivity by means of neutrons. The so-called induced
radioactivity had been discovered by Curie and Joliot in the bombardment of
atomic nuclei by alpha particles.

Fermi put beryllium powder and radium emanation (i.e., radon gas, element 86)
together into a glass container. The radon emits alpha particles, and when these
strike beryllium nuclei, neutrons are released. The neutrons penetrate the walls
of the glass container and can then act on materials placed nearby. Fermi
brought a large number of materials, either in element or compound form, near
to the neutron source for irradiation. The irradiated materials were then placed
in front of a Geiger counter. Many elements were found to emit beta particles
for some time after irradiation, and so verified the induced radioactivity. 3 We
will not discuss here Fermi's proposed explanation4 of the rather complicated
observations, since we are interested only in the one example dealing with the
supposed production of element 93. To study induced radioactivity of uranium,
Fermi took a solution of uranium nitrate, from which all radioactive daughter
products had been removed, and brought it near his neutron source. With a
Geiger counter he was able to show that the solution became radioactive and
emitted beta particles after irradiation. The analysis of the decay curve showed
that not only one but at least five different radioactive half lives were produced.
Fermi emphasized that it was still uncertain whether the different radioactive
decays occur in series (one after the other) or in parallel.

Fermi was able to make a chemical separation of one of the new radioelements,

1 di 4 10/07/2015 15:33
Untitled http://www.chemteam.info/Chem-History/Noddac...

which had a half life of 13 minutes. He did this by adding manganese salt and
concentrated nitric acid to the uranium nitrate solution, then heating to the
boiling point and adding sodium chlorate. The resulting manganese dioxide
precipitate was found to contain almost all of the beta activity with the 13
minute half life. Fermi next tried to show that the radioelement which is
responsible for this beta activity was not an isotope of any known element near
uranium. To show this he added known beta emitting isotopes of the following
elements to the acid solution of uranium nitrate: protactinum (91), thorium (90),
actinium (89), radium (88), bismuth (83), and lead (82). When sodium chlorate
is added to precipitate the manganese dioxide, none of these beta-emitting
isotopes are found in the precipitate, according to Fermi. Since the unidentified
new radioelement does precipitate with manganese, and since it could not be an
isotope of radon (86) or francium (87) either according to its properties, Fermi
concludes that it might be the unknown element 93 (or perhaps 94 or 95).

This method of proof is not valid. Fermi compared his new beta emitter not only
with the immediate neighbor of uranium, namely protactinium, but also
considered several other elements down to lead. This indicates that he thought
a series of consecutive decays was possible (with emission of electrons, protons,
and helium nuclei), which eventually formed the radioelement with the 13
minute half life. It is not clear why he did not investigate the element polonium
(84) which is also between uranium (92) and lead (82), and why he chose to
stop at lead. The old view that the radioactive elements form a continuous
series which ends at lead or thallium (81) is just what the previously mentioned
experiments of Curie and Joliot had disproved. Fermi therefore ought to have
compared his new radioelement with all known elements. It is known from
analytic chemistry that numerous elements will precipitate with manganese
dioxide if they are present as compounds, atoms, or colloids in a nitric acid
solution.

In order to test how various elements behave with Fermi's precipitation method,
we made up 100 cm3 of a 55% nitric acid solution containing a few milligrams
of nearly all stable elements in dissolved or colloidal form. 200 mg manganese
nitrate was added to this solution, it was heated to boiling, and then 2 g of
potassium chloride (dry) was added slowly. The resulting manganese dioxide
precipitate was then tested chemically and spectroscopically for the presence of
other elements. The precipitate contained the following elements: Ti, Nb, Ta, W,
Ir, Pt, An, and Si with almost the total quantity of each element which had been
in solution; Sb, Ph, Bi, Ni, and Co with partial amounts.

As previously noted, Fermi also did not investigate if polonium (84) goes into
the manganese precipitate. An experiment was carried out with polonium which
showed that this element does go almost completely into the MnO 2 precipitate.5
Therefore, the proof that the new (13 minute) radioelement has atomic number

2 di 4 10/07/2015 15:33
Untitled http://www.chemteam.info/Chem-History/Noddac...

93 is in no sense successful, since Fermi's method of eliminating other

possibilities has not been carried through to completion.

One could assume equally well that when neutrons are used to produce nuclear
disintegrations, some distinctly new nuclear reactions take place which have
not been observed previously with proton or alpha-particle bombardment of
atomic nuclei. In the past one has found that transmutations of nuclei only take
place with the emission of electrons, protons, or helium nuclei, so that the
heavy elements change their mass only a small amount to produce near
neighboring elements. When heavy nuclei are bombarded by neutrons, it is
conceivable that the nucleus breaks up into several large fragments, which
would of course be isotopes of known elements but would not be neighbors of
the irradiated element.

The finding that the new radioelement comes down together with rhenium
sulfide when this is precipitated from an acid solution also does not speak for
element 93. In the first place, rhenium sulfide readily absorbs other materials.
Secondly, the prediction of the probable properties of 93 make it appear not at
all certain that this element forms a sulfide which is stable in acid.

Furthermore, if Fermi's interpretation of his experiments were correct, then an

additional necessary conclusion, which was not given by him, is that the beta
decay of element 93 would produce element 94. It should be relatively easy to
separate this chemically from element 93.

One must await further experiments, before one could claim that element 93
has really been found. Fermi himself is careful in this respect, as has been
mentioned previously, but in one article about his experiments 6 and also in the
reports found in the newspapers it is made to appear that the results are
already certain.

The second statement about the discovery of element 93 comes from Odolen
Koblic.7 He reported that he had obtained a substantial quantity of element 93
at Joachimsthal (Czechoslovakia) out of the wash water from roasted
pitchblende ore. (The pitchblende was believed to contain perhaps 1% of this
element.) He described chemical properties of the element and its compounds,
determined its atomic weight, assumed that it was the radioactive parent
substance of protactinum (91), and gave it the name "bohemium" after his
native land. This report also was uncritically accepted and widely distributed in
the newspapers of the whole world.

Through the intervention of Dr. M. Speter, Mr. Koblic sent to me two samples of
his material, with the request to investigate it for the presence of element 93.
Both the chemical analysis and X-ray spectra showed that the material did not
contain any 93; it did show instead a mixture of silver, thallium vanadate and

3 di 4 10/07/2015 15:33
Untitled http://www.chemteam.info/Chem-History/Noddac...

tungstate salts, with excess tungstic acid. After being told of these findings,
Koblic became convinced of the presence of tungsten, and withdrew his claims
to the discovery of element 93.8 It is unnecessary therefore to discuss here the
reactions which Koblic attributed to the supposed new element, since they can
all be explained as reactions from a mixture of vanadium and tungsten. 9

A short time ago (August 11, 1934) news was received from the United States
that Smith and Steinbach in New Jersey succeeded in finding an element with a
higher atomic number than uranium. However there are only some not very
clear newspaper reports available, so that one cannot tell what was done so far.

REFERENCES
1 I. Noddack, Z. Angewandte Chemie 47, 301 (1934).
2 E. Fermi, Nature 133, 898 (1934).
3 Of course not all the atoms of the irradiated material become radioactive, but only an amount

which is undetectable by weighing, perhaps several hundred atoms in this case.

4 E. Fermi, Nature 133, 757 (1934).
5 1 am indebted to Dr. J. Fränz for preparing the polonium and making the radioactive

measurements.
6 Nature 133, 863 (1934).
7 0. Koblic, Chemiker-Ztg. 58, 581 (1934).
8 0. Koblic, Chemiker-Ztg. 58, 683 (1934); Österr. Chemiker-Ztg. 37, 140 (1934).
9 In withdrawing his claim, Mr. Koblic mentioned only the tungsten, not the vanadium, although he

was informed by letter concerning the approximate amounts of both elements in his samples, and
the supposed "bohemium-reactions" were explained due to a mixture containing both vanadium
and tungsten.

4 di 4 10/07/2015 15:33