VOTING 9-4, the Supreme Court yesterday upheld the constitutionality
of the third extension of martial law and suspension of the privilege of writ of habeas corpugr{n Mindanao, 12
Edcel Laeman reiterat- While terrorism has
ed that ihere was no the purpose of sowing factual basi6 to justify rear ancl panlc among the extension of martial ii the populace, rebellion Those who voted to law in Mindanao. an armed uprising dismiss the consolidated They argued that the aqainst the eovernrnent petitions, whicb ques- attacks by terror groups for the culpa-ble purpose tioned the extension and violent incidents in of removing the country were Qhief Justice Lul Mindanao were cas Beisamin, and Jus- terrorism and notacts of or a portion thereof from allegiance to the Repub, tices Diosdado Peralta. lion as required byrebel- law lic or preventinq _the Mariano del Castillo, Es- in declaring martial law. President or the Con- tela Perlas-Bernabe An- "The following acts of gress from exercisins dres Reyes Jr., Alex- terrorism and -lawless their respective powersJ ander Gesmundo, Jose violence mentioned in their pleading read. Reyes Jr.. Ramon Paul the letter dated 06 De- On the other hand, Hernando, and Rosmari cember 2018 of the Pres- Solicitor General .Iose Carandang. ident do per On the other hand, evince the not se existence of Calida cited several at- tacks attributed to the those who voted to grant rebellion and the Presi- New Peoole's Armv in the petitions were Jus- dent failed to connect or Mindanair. which" he tices Antonio CarDio- relat€ said acts to rebel- stressed were clearlv Marvic Leonen- Fraicis lion or furtherance of acts of rebellion. Jardeleza and Alfredo rebellion," petitioners He reiterated that the Benjamin Caguioa dis- insisted. Jolo Cathedral bombine sented, "Terrorism is not i proof of the ongoin! In their memoran- equivalent to rebellion threat to public safetv in dum, petitioners led bv because thev differ in Mindanao posed bv lbcal Albay 1st district Red. motive, talget and scope: