CHAPTER 4

PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS OF DATA

As formerly stated, this study is concerned with testing the motivation, hygiene factors
and job satisfaction among the Non Uniform Police Officers of Angeles City which was
based on Herzberg's motivation-hygiene theory. This chapter presents respondent and
demographic data and the analysis of the data.

TABLE 1
Testing Reliability with Cronbach’s coefficient alpha

Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's Alpha Cronbach's Alpha Based N of Items
on Standardized Items

.868 .912 48

TABLE 2
Age of the Participants
Frequency Percent Valid Cumulative
Percent Percent
21 - 25 years old 8 5.4 5.4 5.4
26 - 30 years old 46 31.3 31.3 36.7
31 - 35 years old 41 27.9 27.9 64.6
36 - 40 years old 32 21.8 21.8 86.4
Valid
41 - 45 years old 9 6.1 6.1 92.5
46 - 50 years old 9 6.1 6.1 98.6
51 - 56 years old 2 1.4 1.4 100.0
Total 147 100.0 100.0

Gender of the Participant

Frequen Percen Valid Cumulative Percent

cy t Percent

Valid Male 119 81.0 81.0 81.0

 Femal 28 19.0 19.0 100.0
e
Total 147 100.0 100.0

Rank of the Participant

Frequency Percent Valid Cumulative Percent
Percent
Police Officer 1 56 38.1 38.1 38.1
Police Officer 2 24 16.3 16.3 54.4
Police Officer 3 34 23.1 23.1 77.6
Senior Police 13 8.8 8.8 86.4
Officer 1
Senior Police 10 6.8 6.8 93.2
Valid
Officer 2
Senior Police 7 4.8 4.8 98.0
Officer 3
Senior Police 3 2.0 2.0 100.0
Officer 4
Total 147 100.0 100.0

Length of Service of the Participant

Frequency Percent Valid Cumulative Percent
Percent
1 - 10 years 77 52.4 52.4 52.4
11 - 20 years 51 34.7 34.7 87.1
Valid 21 - 30 years 17 11.6 11.6 98.6
31 and above 2 1.4 1.4 100.0
Total 147 100.0 100.0

Civil Status of the Participant

Frequency Percent Valid Cumulative Percent

Percent

Valid Single 47 32.0 32.0 32.0

 Married 98 66.7 66.7 98.6
6 2 1.4 1.4 100.0

Total 147 100.0 100.0

Work Designation of the Participant

Frequency Percent Valid Cumulative Percent
Percent
Patrol 37 25.2 25.2 25.2
Intelligence 19 12.9 12.9 38.1
Administration 10 6.8 6.8 44.9
Investigation 23 15.6 15.6 60.5
Valid
Logistics 10 6.8 6.8 67.3
Traffic 36 24.5 24.5 91.8
Others 12 8.2 8.2 100.0
Total 147 100.0 100.0
Table 2 showed the profile of the respondents in terms of the gender, age, civil status,

rank, number of years of working experience, and work designation of the participants.

There were more male respondents than female respondents in the study. Out of the

147 responses received, a total of 119 were male participants (81%) in comparison to

28 female participants (19%).

In terms of age, 31.3% were 26-30 years of age, followed by 27.9% in the age range of

31-35, 21.8% in the age range of 36-40, followed by 6.1% in the age range of both 41-

45 & 46-50, 5.4% in the age range of 21-25, and only 1.4% in the age range of 51-56.

Out of the 147 responses received, a total of 98 were married participant (66.7%) in

comparison to 47 single (32%) and 2 widowed (1.4) participant.

Furthermore, most Respondents are Police Officer 1 (38.1%), followed by Police Officer

3 (23.1%), Police officer 2(16.3%), Senior Police officer 1(8.8%), Senior police officer

2(6.8%), Senior police officer 3(4.8%), and Police officer 4 (2.0%).

The Most work designation of most respondents was Patrol (25.2%) followed by traffic

(24.5%), Investigation (15.6%), intelligence (12.9%), other work (8.2%), and

Administration same with logistics (6.8%).

In terms of a Number or length of service of the participant, most of the respondents are

between 1-10 years (52.4%), followed by 11-20 years (34.7%), 21-30 years (11.6%)

and 31 years and above (1.4%).

In this survey, respondents are generally fresh in police service, and only low in rank

because of length of service. Based on the profile of participant, low rank participant

apparently dominated the participant in this study. Therefore, the analysis may not be

generalized to the whole population of Non Commissioned Police Officer as highest

rank of Non Commissioned Police Officer may have different attitude, belief, behavior,

and attributes towards motivations of job satisfaction as compare to lower rank of Non

Commissioned Police Officer.

TABLE 3