HOME | STAFF | LINKS | CONTACT

Palais des Congrès | Porte Maillot | Paris - France

from April 26th to April 30th 2010

Program
A Lacanian Physics of Semblants Texts and papers
Catherine Meut Thematic Bibliography
 
News
From the first lesson of his course "On the Nature of Semblants," Jacques-Alain Miller maintains that "the semblant is a category " Preparatory evenings
invented by Lacan in the wake of his seminar The Other Side of Psychoanalysis, and that it has its place next to the three categories R,
Annotated Bibliography
S, I[1]. He ascertains that "as a category, the semblant is the antonym, the opposite of the real," and specifys: "Strictly speaking, this is
Accomodation in Paris
the modern sense of the semblant." The semblant constitutes an essential theoretical perspective: "I’m emphasizing the term semblant
because it organizes in a different way the ternary concept (RSI) that Lacan introduced to psychoanalysis"[2]. Blog

It is through a reassessment of semblants that he first intends to make a clarification between the category of the real and the scories of
being, of essentialism. J.-A. Miller reintroduces, with Lacan, the inscription of semblants in nature[3], establishing what one could call a
physics of semblants. From this point of view, the explicit reference to Lucretius supports a classical criticism of metaphysics and
constitutes a decisive phase. For it is not just a matter of establishing a hierarchical overturn between essence and existence, but of
extricating from Lacan’s teachings that which constitutes the "front door" to the future knot theory.

First there will be the introduction to the term ‘semblant’ based on Lacan’s shema at the beginning of Chapter VIII, "Knowledge and
Truth", in the Seminar Encore [4]. It represents "the framework where the semblant is declined into three types: strictly speaking; the
semblant on the path of the from symbolic to the real; and the true and reality"[5]. This framework "is necessary if we want to depart
from that which, from philosophy, is being infiltrated even to psychoanalysis, if we call philosophy the discourse that puts being in the
place of the real". Putting being in the place of the real is "the illusion that, through the symbolic, through the articulation of the
signifying chain, one can deduce from what is, a "there is".

In fact, the object a is in the place of the semblant[6]. Its "real nature" is not of the real, even if it is found on the path to the real. Its
nature pertains to being, emphasizes Lacan in 1973. Thus J.-A. Miller explains : "To displace the object a from the real to being is to
highlight its affinities with the semblant."

"Semblants spare us from the real." This conclusive phrase[7] echos Lacan’s fundamental statement : "Jouissance is only questioned,
evoked, pursued or elaborated upon from the semblant". In adding that "the semblant is not vain illusion, the semblant operates", J.-A.
Miller incites us to draw our own conclusions, in a practice where the analytical act operates on the real of jouissance. And he insists:
"Opposing the semblant to the real is in the very spirit of psychoanalysis which itself constitutes a return towards the real of sex"[8]. It is
in this spirit that we will address the category of semblant, with a clinic of the sinthome, where the semblant that is put into function
will be the object little a.

 
Notes
1- Class of November 20, 1991.
2- Class of May 20 , 1992.
3- Lacan J., Seminar XVIII, D’un discours qui ne serait pas du semblant, Paris, Seuil, 2006, chap. I.
4- Lacan J., Seminar XX, Encore, Paris, Seuil, 1975, p. 83.
5- Class of January 22, 1992.
6- Classes of January 22 and February 26, 1992.
7- Class of December 18, 1992.
8- Class of March 25, 1992.

Copyright 2009 - World Association of Psychoanalysis