Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
NASACONTRACTOR K-2835
REPORT
m
cr)
00
N
=
I
4
m
U
z
ANALYSIS A N D COMPILATION
OF MISSILE AERODYNAMIC DATA
Volume I - Data Presentation and Analysis
James 0,Nichols
Prepared by
AUBURN UNIVERSITY
Auburn, Ala. 36830
jor Langley Research Center
James 0. Nichols
10. Work Unit No.
9. PerformingOrganization Name and Address
Aerospace Engineering Department
Auburn U n i v e r s i t y 11. Contract or Grant No.
Auburn, Alabama 36830 NSG 1002
13. Type of Report and Period Covered
2. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address Contractor Report
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Langley Research Center 14. Sponsoring Agency Code
Hampton, VA 23365
based on t h e d a t a .
iii
some d i s t r i b u t i o n , thus some e r r o r s t h a t e x i s t i n t h a t r e p o r t and i n
e r r o r s have been c o r r e c t e d i n t h i s f i n a l r e p o r t .
l i s t s t h e p i t c h c o n t r o l e f f e c t i v e n e s s as C
ma
. It should
be Cm .
6
The model drawing from TM X-3070 shown i n t h e I n t e r i m Report
f i c i e n t d a t a i n TM X-2367.
typing t h i s report.
V
SUMMARY
are a l s o presented.
The Mach number range of the d a t a is from about 0.2 t o 4.63; how-
a) Base drag c o e f f i c i e n t ,
‘D,b’
b) Drag c o e f f i c i e n t , CDs0.
c) Lift-curve s l o p e , CL
a
.
d) Aerodynamic-center l o c a t i o n , Xac/a.
vi
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SUMMARY .............................. vi
SYMBOLS............................... ix
INTRODUCTION.. .......................... 1
DATAANALYSIS.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
SUMMARY OF CONFIGURATIONS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
DATASUMMARIES.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16,
vii
SYMBOLS
I Axial force
cA axial-force coefficient,
qA
Drag
drag coefficient,
cD qA
Base drag at a=Oo
base drag coefficient at a=O O ,
qA
drag coefficient at a=O0
'D,o
Lift
cL lift coefficient, -
qA
,
lateral (roll) control effectiveness, per deg.
Pitching moment
i
I
m'
m' Ci
pitching-moment coefficient,
qAd
slope of pitching-moment curve at a=Oo, per deg.
C pitch control effectiveness at a = O o , per deg.
m6 Normal force
cN normal-force coefficient,
qA
ix
s i d e - f o r c e parameter, p e r deg.
v a r i a t i o n of side-force c o e f f i c i e n t w i t h d i r e c t i o n a l c o n t r o l
s u r f a c e d e f l e c t i o n , p e r deg.
m a x i m u m body diameter
maximum l i f t - d r a g r a t i o
body l e n g t h
mass-flow r a t i o
free-stream dynamic p r e s s u r e
a n g l e of a t t a c k , deg.
s i d e s l i p a n g l e , deg .
angle of c o n t r o l s u r f a c e d e f l e c t i o n , p o s i t i v e t r a i l i n g edge
down o r t o l e f t looking upstream, deg.
angle of r o l l , deg.
Subscripts:
a aileron
C canard
F flap
roll i n d i c a t e s d e f l e c t i o n of l a t e r a l c o n t r o l s u r f a c e s
W wing
Yaw i n d i c a t e s d e f l e c t i o n of d i r e c t i o n a l c o n t r o l s u r f a c e s
X
INTRODUCTION
d i f f i c u l t y i n p r e s e n t i n g summary d a t a f o r t h e numerous c o n f i g u r a t i o n s
afterbody c o n f i g u r a t i o n s - f l a r e s , f i n s , and b o a t t a i l s .
Most of t h e c o n f i g u r a t i o n s r e p o r t e d h e r e i n are s u i t a b l e f o r h i g h l y
meters square and has a Mach number range from about 0.20 to 1.30.
The Unitary Plan wind t u n n e l has two test s e c t i o n s , each about 1.22
meters square and about 2.13 meters long. The nozzle l e a d i n g t o each
Mach number test s e c t i o n and from 2.3 t o 4.7 i n t h e high Mach number
test section.
d e f l e c t i o n of f o u r s u r f a c e s i n s t e a d of two.
a) Base d r a g c o e f f i c i e n t , CD,b.
b) Drag c o e f f i c i e n t , C
D,o
.
c) Uft-curve slope, C
l e n g t h s were used.
-4-
The aerodynamic-center l o c a t i o n , X
ac
/ a , is referenced t o body l e n g t h
and measured p o s i t i v e a f t from t h e nose. It w a s c a l c u l a t e d w i t h t h e
t h i s report.
-5-
The method of c a l c u l a t i n g CR
varies widely among t h e o r i g i n a l r e p o r t s
6
and care must be e x e r c i s e d when comparing various c o n f i g u r a t i o n s . I n
some cases t h e r o l l c o n t r o l d e f l e c t i o n i s t h e a l g e b r a i c d i f f e r e n c e
r o l l , t h e c o n t r o l s u r f a c e s are d e f l e c t e d d i f f e r e n t i a l l y but e q u a l l y i n
of t h e i n d i v i d u a l c o n t r o l s u r f a c e . The s i g n convention a l s o v a r i e s b u t
i n t h i s r e p o r t p o s i t i v e d e f l e c t i o n gives p o s i t i v e r o l l i n g moment.
surfaces.
% i s t h e change i n r o l l i n g moment c o e f f i c i e n t p e ri ndegree
dicates
of d e f l e c t i o n of t h e lateral ( r o l l ) c o n t r o l s u r f a c e s , and Cy
6
t h e change i n s i d e f o r c e c o e f f i c i e n t p e r degree d e f l e c t i o n of t h e
-6-
DATA ANALYSIS
equations r e p r e s e n t i n g t h e aerodynamic c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s as f u n c t i o n s of
t h e d a t a f o r t h e t h r e e mid-sized wings.
of an i n v e s t i g a t i o n of t h e e f f e c t s of v a r i o u s l o n g i t u d i n a l p o s i t i o n s of
v e r t i c a l f i n e x h i b i t s a s m a l l decrease.
configuration c l a s s i f i c a t i o n such as :
c) Control s u r f a c e s -
wing, t a i l , o r canard. Hinge l i n e s are
shown as dashed l i n e s .
TM X - 3 0 7 0 :E-20
SURFACE-TO-AIR OR AIP-TO-AIR
I 21-23
TM X - 1 5 3 9
>
> TM X - 1 8 3 9 21-23
1 TM X-2491 29-31
-10-
46-47
46-4 7
52-55
-11-
SURFACE-TO-AIF
PAGES
.I'M X - l U Z 3 , 'I'M X - l 4 l b , 56-04
TM X - 1 7 5 1
TM X-2774 65-67
AI R-TO- SURFACE
TM X-1112 68-71
72-73
1- TM X-1492 '74-77
78-79
-12-
REFERENCE PAGES
TN D-7069 80-82
TM X-1538 88-91
I
I
PROJECTILE
! TM X-2831 103-104
-13-
k
0
-14-
TABLE 1. DIRECTIONAL AND LATERAL STABILITY AND CONTROL DATA
CONTAINED I N REFERENCE REPORTS
-15-
DATA SUMMARIES
AIR-TO-AIR M I S S I L E S (AAM)
-16-
k
c-.
aJ
P;
E
2
m
m
N al
I
!
i
TABLE 2. - LONGITUDINAL PARAMETERS; u ~ O 0 ,
DIAMOND AIRFOIL
- -I - -__
M = 2.30 M = 4.60
-- ~ . . -
$=O" $=45 " $=0 O (p=45"
___
cNc4 0.592 0.568 0.454 6.373
I
cmcr -0.643 -0.440 -0.421 -0 146
-
c
a
'
R
0.586 0.569 0.577 0 1547
WEDGE AIRFOIL
- .--__.
M = 2.30 M = &,LO
-
$=O" $=45 O ,p=0 ,t-45"
. -- -
cNa 0.568 0.547 0.424 ii 1374
11
C 0.361 0.463 0.030 0 066
"6
Ref. TM X-846
-1 7-
-18-
r
/J
-7
0
\o
vr
d
1
2. L . \
cn 6
I 1 I I I J
- I I I I I
1 2 3 4 5
M
R e f . TM X-3070
B
OR
1
I
AIR-TO-AIR MISSILES (AAM)
i
I
-2 1-
I
I
i
-22-
- - - - - _ Delta
_. - - Cranked
.4- Rectangular
.3 '
C
D,c
.2.
.1-
CL
a
I I I I I
e6 -
-
Xac
.4 -
li
.2 -
0 1 2 3 11
5
M
Ref. TM X-1839
-2 3-
--,---Delta
Cranked
Rectangular
0 .
I I I I 1
-
I -1.0
-
\ \
'.
-- -- --_ -- --_--
'
\
-2.0 1-
cn
$ -3.0 - --_____-- ----
-4.0 \
-5.0 -
.1
clg -E 1 I I
All c o n f i g u r a t i o n s
I I I
1 I I I 1 1
0 1 2 3 4 5
M
Figure 8. - V a r i a t i o n of s i d e s l i p d e r i v a t i v e s w i t h Mach number; a'Oo, +=(lo,
mid-s i z e d wings.
Ref. TM X-1839
-24-
Moment center
I-.
1 '*'\At 10.16
r- 32.99
( 1 2. 99) 7 1 33.02
(1 3. 00)
12. 70
(5.00)
( 21 . 60 75 ) ,/
Nose 2 (intermediate bluntness nose)
I ( 378.
0 . 9720
92) 7-
3. 81
/ /
Moment center
' 33.000
Nose 3 ( h e m i s p h e r i c a l nose)
Ref. TM x-2289
~~
-25-
Nose
1.6
1.2
C
D $0
.8
.4
.8
.6
cL CL .4
.2
I
0 I I
I
---_
1
2
1.6
cD ,o
1.2
.8
----
__------
-
---------
-
.4
0 I I A
.6 .
cL
a
.4 .
--- -==--= -- ------
--
.2 -
I 1
0
.55
1.2 1.6 2.0 2.4 2.8 3.2
M
$=450
Ref. TM X-2289
-2 7-
NOSE
cn
B
1.0 -
O J I I I I 1
0 - 1 1
--LC_-----
Ctg
-.01 L
-.2
I I I I I 1
1.2 1.6 2 .o 2.4 2.8 3.2
M
Figure 1 2 . - Variation of sideslip derivatives with Mach number;
I
a = O o , +=oo,
Ref. TM X-2289
-2 8-
NOSE
2.0-
cn 1.0-
8
0 I i 1 i 1
.01
cz%
-.01O E
-.l
% - . 20
cy%
-.3
-.4
-.5
a
Q,
U
0
c
I
I
I
iI
-1
I
1
I
!
I
-
~
i w
0
0
-
N
N
sn
n
i
I
1
I
4
rl
~
i
I
I
I
-30-
6.1St2.42)
t 33.02113.001 I
io. /
Body s t a t i o n
55. 88(22.00)
I 200
-25.40t10.00)-
S m a l l booster
F i g u r e 14 - Concluded.
Ref. TM X-2L91
-31-
2.0
C
D , o 1.0
r - ------
only)
0
\ CD ,b (Boosters o f f )
I - - Small boosters
_------
Large b o o s t e r s
Boosters off
cL
a .4 - - -_- %
0 I I I I I
1*2
.8
it All configurat-Jns
\Mi
1.z I. u L."
7
2.8 3.2
L. 1
.4
.4
cL 4 .O
et
.2
13.0
I I
0 I
1.2
X
-
aC!
R
.8
.4
0
0
----
1
I
2
M
3 4 5
I I
F i g u r e 1 7 . - V a r i a t i o n of l o n g i t u d i n a l parameters w i t h Mach number; a-0:
.4
cn .3
f3
.2
.1
$-.01
" C O
-.02 $=0° & 45"
0 1 2 3 4 5
M
R e f . TM X-1309, TM X-1352
-35 -
I I I I 1
-
11
.02
+=oo & 45”
.01 -
0
.02 -
cy6
.01 - +=O O
~
/
- ---- -
0 . I I I I
I '
, I u"
t-
u
M
cu
I
x
5
k
aJ
ffi
4.
cL *
a
--
II
I I I I J
0 1 2 3 4 5
b?
Ref. TM X-2367
-38-
I
i h
-39-
0
Horizontal t a i l s deflected
C
m6 -.5
-1 .o 1 /
/
For eb ody
1.6
0" Conical
Conical
Blunt
C
D,o .8
1.0 -
cL
a .5 -
I I I I J
0 -
--
X
ac
-
R
.5 - / - -
0 I I I I I
2 3 4 5
M
F i g u r e 23. - V a r i a t i o n of l o n g i t u d i n a l parameters w i t h Mach number; a-09
Ref. TM X-2780
-40-
H o r i z o n t a l ca
0
C
.
J' \
D,o \
r
A- ---
1.0
X
- ac
.5
R
0
0 1 2 3 4 5
M
F i g u r e 2 4 . - V a r i a t i o n of l o n g i t u d i n a l p a r a m e t e r s w i t h Mach number; a=O.
Ref. TM X-2780
-41 -
.5 -
.4 -
C
.3 -
"6
.2 -
.1 -
0 1 1
-
[$=Oo ( 2 canards d e f l e c t e d )
C 0- -----_ _ _ _ _ e - -
-.01 c
I
$=45O ( 4 canards d e f l e c t e d )
-.02 .
I
I 1 1
1 2 3
M
F i g u r e 2 5 . - D i r e c t i o n a l and l a t e r a l c o n t r o l e f f e c t i v e n e s s o f c a n a r d con-
f i g u r a t i o n w i t h blunted ogive nose; cl=Oo.
Ref. TM X-2780
-4 2-
d
a
U
m
C
I ‘
L
I
-43-
I . I 7-
I
I
I
i
I
I
Y
-44 -
L
.2
C
m6
.1 - 1
1 d-~-Cmg
0 1 1 I I
.8
.4
.2
.6 \
.4
cL
a
.2
R
XaC-4
0 1
t
0
1
1 2
1
M
I
3
1
4
I
Ref. TM X-1834
-45-
.8 - \
\
\
\
Cn
B
-4 - \
'\
.2 -
0 I I I 1
-.2 -
0 I I I I 1
-.2 -
cys -.4 -
-.6 -
-.8 -
0 1 2 3 4 5
M
Figure 28. - Variation of sideslip derivatives with Mach number; azoo.
R e f . TM X-1834
-46-
(II
rl
0
k
4
c
0
0
rn
I+
0
a
k
k cd
c,
c c
aJ
0 0
V
0
hD
=I
a
Q,
B
(II
I
M
C
d
2aJ
rl
d Q,
aJ bo
k
c,
2Ld
3a
F:
aJ
rn
G 4
4 k
k
aJ
c,
B
d
a,
a
Q,
a
5
d
3
k
t
rl
5
d
Q,
a 3
2 rl
Q,
a
aJ
v 2
n
P
W
'UBLE 3. - LONGITUDINAL PARAMETERS AT MACH NUMBER 4.65; a~0"
V
A
C ac
-
CCNFIGURATI ON cm 6 D $0 cL
a R
C
CONFIGURATION
t
TABLE 5. - DIRECTIONAL AND LATERAL CONTROL EFFECTIVENESS
AT MACH NUMBER OF 4.65; a"Oo
CONFIGURATION
C
"6
cy6
roll yaw
Ref. TM X-187
-47-
0
m
7- b
B
.-
0
..
- L
w
l-l
0
0
a J I
u
P C
h,
L)
u
C
a,
E
I 'I
-49-
.a 4.0
cLi .4 2.0
0 0
1.2
*a c
R
.4
0
0 1 3 4 5
M
09
I-
co
\o
i
v)
&
o\ P)
U rl U
C) rn
m
I
I
I
!
I P)
k
i 0
I
I
I
I
1
I
d
co
m
I-
hl
d
d
FV
U
m
0
d
-5 3-
- -....
- ---
....
.....
..... ......
c # - - . . a -
/
0
.....
/
0
Tail Configurations
..........x Cruciform
--- - -T Inverted
1 Conventional
c
configuratione
0
.
cL
a
O 8
.6
I
I I I I
1.0
..................................
-
'ac 05 LT
e
0
1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0
M
R e f . "If X-71984
-54-
TAIL CONFIGURATIONS
.................... X C r u c i f o r m
-- - - - - -,TInverted
'l°F
.8
LConvent ional
.1 r
- - _ _ _ a - --
............
-I,
fl-. O
1
I ------- L
-.2 L
O --I
cyfl -.2 ...........
..- *
..*
-.3 L
Ref. TM X-71984
-55-
--_---- T Inverted
Conventional
I I 1
-1.5 L
-06
%yaw O
. ..................
--- - - - -
-.06 1 /
/-
d - - -
.02 - - ’. e * . .
.01 - - ----__- - - - _
0 I I I
1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0
M
Figure 37. - Directional and l a t e r a l control e f f e c t i v e n e s s ; cl”oo.
Ref. TM X-71984
SURFACE-TO-AIR MISSILES ( S A M )
.
-56-
4
a
8
k
0
ul
r(
d
10
8 ii
8 I
Q)
m
-57-
-.4 L
I
OL I I I 1 I
.8 4
v 7
CL
a
.4
-m 2
0 I I I I 0
>
.8
7
R
I I I 1 I
-5 8-
.8 r
-6 -
C
n
B -4 -
.2 -
0 I
-.2
cy B -.4
-.6
-.8
c
0 1 2 3 4 5
M
Ref, TM X-1025
-59-
I I I 1
C
n6 -.l -
-.2 -
-.3 i
.06
.04
.02
0 I I I I I J
0 1 2 3 4 5
M
Ref. TM X-1025
-60-
--
I
-6 1-
-.4 '
+ = 00 & 45O
--4L--
R
00 I 2 M 3 4 5
.8
c .4
"8
B -.4
-.8 L
r- 4=45 O
.04 I
C
.02
01 I 1 I I 1
0 1 2 3 4 5
M
Ref. TM X-1416
rl
In
l-
d
I
X
-64-
C I i 1
m6
-.1-
I-
/
4
X
-
ac
.8
.6
.4
7
R
.2
0
2 3 4 5
M
Figure 46. - Variation of longitudinal parameters with Mach number; a=O:
Ref. TM X-1.751
+
-65-
__
,'
I
I
I
.I
ti
41-
'i I
I
I
I
i I
-4 I
- D
-
n
-66-
-
W
L
C
W
E
0
H
Y)
.-a
V
'D
q-l
pz
-1
-
-67-
$I = oo
cD ,o
'. '.
cL
a
.8
11 .4
0
0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3
M v
Figure 48. - Variation of longitudinal parameters w i t h Mach number; a-0'.
4
0 c
mi
0
-0
co-
J
t-i
a,
U hl
C rl
a, d
u ri
I
U x
C
a,
5
c
I
a
m
m
.
h
m
m
ri
ri c
J J'
4
I
-69-
C
m6
-.3
l.or
cL
a .2
1.2
.a
-
'ac
R
.4
0
1.5 2.0 2.5
M
R e f . TM X-1112
-70'
C
"B
0 i i
I 1 J
cyB - . 2
-.4
-.6
I 1 1
1.5 2.0 2.5
M
R e f . TM X-1112
-71-
0 I i
C -.l -
"6
-
-.2
-.3 3
-08 -
.06 -
.04 -
.02 -
0 I I
Ref. TM X-1112
7-72-
* -c.
-
W
I-
. 4 -
TABLE 6 . - LONGITUDINAL PARAMETERS; ~ 1 ~ 0 " .
Mach Number 1 . 6
Config- Fin
cm6 CD 9 0 cLci 'ac"
uration Sweep $=O" $=45" $=O" $=45" O=O" $=45" $=O" $=45"
BF2
65" - - .400 .398 .lo4 .lo8 .684 .697
BF2
30" - - .565 .560 ,114 .114 .702 .720
BF2W2 30" -.012 -.016 .688 .690 .218 .227 .619 .619
BFIWl 30" -.012 -.016 .610 .590 .174 .185 .606 .603
BF2
30" - - ,508 ,509 .110 .lo6 .683 .694
R e f . TM X-1491
-73-
-74-
.-t
a
m
\U
m
-3
d
I
X
I
-75-
/-- '. - 7 -
a
0
'I :
z
-
3
e
Y
TABLE 7. - LONGITUDINAZ, PARAMETERS AT MACH NUMBER 2.5
W I T H INLETS COVERED; ~
1'0".
CONFIGURATION -
'ac
R
9 = 45"
X
C ONFI GURAT ION C
ac
-
cm6 D9 0
R
Ref. TM X-1492
-76-
TABLE 8. - SIDESLIP DERIVATIVES AND ROLL CONTROL EFFECTIVENESS
AT MACH NUMBER 2.5 WITH INLETS COVERED: w o o .
i$ = oo
C C C *
Configuration "6 zB l6
roll
i$ = 4 5 O
C f
C C
Configuration 1,
ni3 li3 cyi3 roll
* Horizontal t a i l s were d e f l e c t e d .
t All f o u r t a i l s were d e f l e c t e d .
Ref. TM X-1492
-77-
h
VI
Q,
.c
0
c
v
.r(
I
i' ~
VI
L
j, , '
Q,
z
c,
Y
.r(
c
aJ
V
c
.r(
Q,
k
(d
VI
c
0
.r(
VI
c
z
;a"
L
.a
0
c
3
1
-81-
1.0
C
Dso .5
10.0
8.0
1.0
6.0
(L/D)ma:
4.0
cLa .5
2 .o
0 I I 1
1,,o
.5 I
\
0 I I I
0 1 2 3
M
Ref. TN D-7069
C
nB
.1
-.01
0
..
-- I
-82-
I I
-.03
cys
-.2
-
-
I
I
-- I
I
I
I
1
I
0 1 2 3
M
Figure 59. - Variation of sideslip derivatives with Mach number; o"Oo.
Ref. TN D-7069
-83-
I-
L
E
=
..-
.-
h
x
C
.-
c
4
.-
a
c
..
mm
c m
04
nY
o
r(
4-.
a
a
c
n
0-
rtN
v .-CD
z
I
-0
o m
..
oc
-85 -
'm
6
-.8 t Afterbody o f f
- - - - - - - Afterbody on
C
D,o
.5 - C
D,b
I I
1.0 10 I
cL .5
a
1.0
X
-
ac
.5
R
I I
0
1.6 2.0 2.4
M
Ref. TM X-1304
-86-
.2 -
C
ng .1 -
0 I I
1.6 2 .o 2.4
M
Figure 6 2 . - V a r i a t i o n o f s i d e s l i p d e r i v a t i v e s w i t h Mach number; ct=Oo.
Cone-shaped f a i r i n g a t t a c h e d t o n a c e l l e i n l e t .
R e f . TM X-1304
TABLE 9. - DIRECTION AND LATERAL CONTROL EFFECTIVENESS;* a=Oo.
Yaw Control t ~ 0 1 1Control+'+
C C C C
Mach No. n6 5 n6
1.80 -.161 .032 ,040 .437 .lo2 -.075
-.215
~~
t t R o l l control provided by d i f f e r e n t i a l d e f l e c t i o n of t a i l f i n s .
Ref. TM X-1304
-87-
-88-
‘r
n
c
c
0 I 1 I
c -.l
"6
-.2
-
-
c
C
.4 -
D,o
.2 -
I I I I I I
- 5.
-<-
.e p
CL,.4 - 3. (L/D>,,,~~
I I I I I 1.
Ref. TM X-1538
-90-
-.lO 3
cyB - . l
-.2 c -
L 1 1
1.5 2.0 2.5
Ref. TM X-1538
-9 1-
0
i 1
-.01-
-.02 -
C
ns -.03,
-.04 .-
-.05 -
-.06-
czG
1; F0
, ,
1.5 2.0 2.5
M
Ref. TM X-1538
-92-
-
t
m
-
In
n
c
Y
N
1 h
m n
T
A-
i -
n-4
.-IN
0 O/ \
N
m .
L
I-
I
4
?
-
A L
m
N
d
t
m 0
D a
n I-
n
c)
c
m
i
h
m
i ll
m
'9
-
-
m
0
m
I
m
0
1I.
-9 3-
4
6.385
(is, 218)
Canard hinge l i n e
--
(0.356) (1.064)
0.071 (0.180)
(0.089) 0.035
0.270 Root f l a r e
(0.686)
Small canard,C2
(5.398)
(0.318) (5.227)
(0.318) 42.125
0.125 1 1
(15.240
6.000
5.400
c
k- 6.440 (16.358)
T a i l T3
T a i l Tp
Figure 6 7 . - Concluded
Ref. TM SX-1531
-94-
.4 r
.3 -
C
m
6c .2 -
.1 1 1 1 I 1 I I
.2 ' 1 1 I I 1 1 I
.5
+-
cL
.4 -- -------- - -
o!
.3 4.
.8
-
xac .4
R
.5
.4
C
ng .3
.2
-1
-.01
B
-.02
i
I
I
8-
1
-9 7-
-
L
I
I
7.500
119.0501 1-7
119.0501
. 1 , ,
0.250
0.250 TIoo
I
I
(12. 700)
(12. 700)
E-- - -1
w2 Wing
Ref. TM SX-1961
-98-
w1 .
-6 - F1 w2 .- --
C
mg
C
.4 -
.2 1 I I
- .04
C
D ,b
- .02
5.0 1 5 .O
.5 4.0 .5 4.0
(L/D)
max (L/DImax
.4 3.0 .4 3.0
.3 .3
1.0 -
---- - - - - - -
R .5 -
1 1 I 1
0
1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
M M
F i g u r e 71. - V a r i a t i o n of l o n g i t u d i n a l p a r a m e t e r s w i t h Mach number; c i = O o .
Kef. TM SX-1961
C
"B
-.lL
11111
-.3 L
.016 .016
a .008 - \
.004 .004 -
0
1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
M M
Figure 72. - Variation of sideslip derivatives and r o l l c o n t r o l
effectiveness with Mach number; a=Oo.
Ref. TM SX-1961
-100-
- . 9,
D
n H
i 8
-101-
1.0
.9 - - - --
c”s C
.3
.2
.8
.7
C
D,o
.6
.5
.4
I
1.0
0
1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 3.0
M
Figure 7 4 . V a r i a t i o n o f l o n g i t u d i n a l p a r a m e t e r s w i t h Mach numbers; a=Oo.
Ref. TM SX-2299
-102-
.1 -
-.-=- /= - = ,I--- '.
C -_ '
.---
/
//
\
- / - - -
"B 0 - // 1 1 I
-.1-
01 I I 1 I I I I I
Ref. TM SX-2299
-103-
c
m'
k
9)
U
B
.rl
U
C
Q,
V
C
.rl
9)
2
(II
C
0
.rl
(II
E:
9)
E
;a"
4
$
E
v
a,
+
4
.rl
V
.-90)
k
a
E
E
m
2
cd
w
0
-104-
.11
r 0 . 5 CAL. C O W I G .
1.0 CAL. C O B F I G .
1.5 CAI,. CCLIFIG.
.3
.2 1 I I I
cI, .06
a
.05
1.2
.R
-
'ac
2
.4
I I I
1 2 3
M
Ref. TM X-2831
LIST OF DOCUMENTS SUMMARIZED
-105-
-106-