Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
This study evaluates the influence of wear test parameters such as sliding speed and normal load on dry sliding wear
performance of Al-Cu-Mg/titanium dioxide particle reinforced composites. Three different weight percentages of titanium
dioxide reinforced composite materials are used to conduct the test. Experiments are performed based on the plan of
experiments generated through Taguchi technique. A mathematical model is developed relating wear rate and the test
parameters using multiple regressions and the model is checked for adequacy. The experimental results and the developed
model show that higher sliding speed and titanium dioxide reinforcement will favor for reducing the wear rate of
composites.
Metal matrix composites (MMCs) are engineering sliding wear tests using a pin-on-disc wear tester
materials that refer to metal based materials where the pins were of 0.45% carbon steel and disc
reinforced with particulates, whisker or fiber, which were made of aluminum alloy composites reinforced
can produce a considerable alteration in the with SiC-whisker, Al2O3-fibers and SiC particles.
physical and mechanical properties of the base alloy. The result analysis shows that the wear rate of
Metal matrix composites are an important class of MMCs decreased with increasing volume fraction
materials with the potential to replace a number of of reinforcing material. Ranganath et al.11 studied
conventional materials being used in automotive, the dry sliding wear of garnet reinforced
aerospace, defense and leisure industries where the Zn-Al metal matrix composites and reported that
demand for lightweight and high strength components wear resistance of the MMCs increases as the
are increasing1,2. The mechanical components that content of the garnet increases. Acharya et al.12
undergo sliding or rolling contact, such as bearings, investigated the wear behavior of Al/red mud
clutches, seals, guides, piston rings, splines, composites and reported that the coefficient of friction
brakes and clutches subject to some degree of wear. decreases as the load increases. The presence of
Wear is a surface phenomenon that occurs by the red mud particles improves the hardness and wear
displacement and detachment of materials, because resistance of the composites.
it usually implies a progressive loss of weight and Fernandez et al.13 used a statistical method, the
alteration of dimensions over a period of time3. factorial experimental design to investigate the
MMCs generally possess superior wear effects of reinforcement, load and abrasive grain
resistance compared to unreinforced aluminum alloys. size of Ni based coating alloy. The summary of
Many researches on the dry sliding wear behavior of the result is grain size exerted the greatest effect
MMCs had been reported4-9. Tribological behavior of on abrasive wear, followed by reinforcement. The
materials depends on many factors such as properties applied load had a much lower effect and the
of material combinations, experimental condition and environment was found to have a minor effect.
type of wear tester. Miyajima et al.10 carried out dry Hariharan et al.14 adopted Taguchi techniques for
—————— optimization of heat treatment factors using design of
*Corresponding author (E-mail: hemantkumar.iem@gmail.com) experiment. The tribological behavior of aluminum
330 INDIAN J. ENG. MATER. SCI., AUGUST 2013
both contact surfaces of the pair. To facilitate was used to calculate the coefficients of the
measurement, the pin is generally the wearing polynomial equation. The regression summary of this
member that has a lower hardness. Schematic model is given in Tables 4 and 5. The mathematical
diagram of the wear test rig is shown in Fig. 1. model as determined by regression analysis is shown
The dimensions of the pin specimen measured in Eq. (3).
8 mm in diameter and 30 mm height (ASTM G99).
The test specimen was gripped in the wear testing Wear = 0.0187 - 0.0294S + 0.0001L - 0.000266R +
machine to avoid rolling during the test. The wear 0.0113S2 - 0.000019R2 - 0.000049SL + 0.000619SR –
test was conducted as per the orthogonal array of 0.000004LR … (3)
Taguchi which is given in Table 3. The wear rates
of the specimen are studied for the sliding distance Results and Discussion
of 2200 m. Wear test was conducted as per procedure
Wear mechanism
reported elsewhere21. Each experiment was repeated
Wear can be generally described as the removal
twice and average response values (experimental
of material from a surface in relative motion by
wear) are given in Table 3.
mechanical or chemical processes. Titanium dioxide
Prediction of wear rate model reinforced Al-Cu-Mg alloy metal matrix composite
The response function representing the dry posses superior wear resistance compared with
sliding wear behavior of the composite material is unreinforced Al alloy. The wear mechanism in
expressed as: metal matrix composite is different from Al alloy.
The enhanced wear mechanism in metal matrix they have a significant effect on reducing the wear
composite is because of particulate reinforcement rate of the material. Whereas, normal load applied on
in matrix alloy. The mechanism of material removal the composite material has a positive effect on the
during the wear process of the unreinforced wear rate. The interactions (S*L) and (L*R) have
alloy is by plastic deformation and gouging. negative effects, while (S*R) has a positive effect on
In composite material the wear mechanism is the wear rate. Figure 4 shows that the experimental
by plastic deformation, gouging and fracture of wear rate is slightly higher than the predicted model
reinforcing material (TiO2) leading to the formation value. The predicted values are in close agreement
of a thin layer at the interface, thereby providing with the experimental values.
protection to the matrix material. This phenomenon
is attributed to increase in the wear resistance of
metal matrix composite22. Figure 2 shows the
optical micrograph of wear tracks 8 wt% of titanium
dioxide reinforced aluminum composite material.
The experimental results of the dry sliding wear
rate and the calculated values of the signal-to-noise
ratio are given in Table 3. The highest value of the
SN ratio implies that signal is much higher than
the random effects of noise factors. Figure 3 shows
the interaction plots for SN ratio. The figure clearly
reveals that, the minimum wear rate is obtained,
when the sliding speed is at a higher level, while Fig. 2—Optical micrograph of wear tracks of 8TiO2 MMC
the normal load is at a lower level. The graph also
indicates that the addition of a higher weight % of
titanium dioxide will favor for reducing the wear rate.
Discussion on mathematical model
The theoretical wear rate was calculated using
Eq. (3) and the values are plotted in Fig. 4. The
regression summary (Table 4) shows that the
coefficient of the main factors: sliding speed and
reinforcement have negative value which shows that
Table 4—The adequacy test results of the model
Dependent Wear
N 27
Squared multiple R 0.9349
Adjusted squared multiple R 0.9004
Standard error of estimate 0.0003594 Fig. 3—Interaction plot for the test parameters
Conclusions
This paper presented a Taguchi design of
experimental technique to study the effect of wear
parameters on the sliding wear behavior of aluminum
metal matrix composites. The regression model and
signal-to-noise ratio shows that the main factors sliding
speed and reinforcement have a negative influence on
the wear rate, which is favorable for reducing the wear
rate of the composite material. Whereas, normal load
applied on the composite material has a positive effect
on the wear rate. The interactions (S*L) and (L*R) have
Fig. 5—The confirmation test results
negative effects, while (S*R) has a positive effect on
the wear rate. The adequacy test results show that
Table 6—Confirmation test parameters the model has the adequate predictive capability.
Test Sliding Normal wt% of Experimental Signal- The experimental values are in close agreement with
speed (m/s) load (N) TiO2 wear rate to- noise the predicted values.
(mm3/N-m) ratio
1 1.26 20 4 0.00233 0.0017928 References
1 Rhotagi Pradeep, Cast M.M.C. Past, Present & Future, AFS
2 0.84 20 6 0.00309 0.0035138 Transactions, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin,
3 1.06 20 8 0.0023 0.002459 Silver Anniversary paper, Div.2. 01-25, 200, (2001)
2 Das S, Trans Indian Inst Metals, 5(4) (2004) 325-334.
3 Surappa M K, Sadhana, 28(1&2) (2003), 319-334.
Verification of adequacy of the model
4 Shashidara S M, Mallikarjuna C & Muralidhara, J Manuf
Table 5 shows the adequacy test results of Eng, 3(1) (2008).
the developed model. R2 value is 0.9349, which 5 Rosenberger M R, Forlerer E & Schvezov C E, Wear, 266
shows that 93.4% of experimental data fits the (2009) 356-359.
developed model. The number of factors selected 6 Prabhu Swamy N R, Ramesh C S & Chandrashekar T,
Bull Mater Sci, 33(1)(2010) 49-54.
for this model fits into the regression equation 7 Wlodarczyk–Flingier A & Dobrzeanski Adamiak LA,
which is illustrated from adjusted R2 value. Since the J Achieve Mater Manuf Eng, 30(2) (2008) 147-150.
value of R2 is close to the adjusted R2 value, the 8 Chikanna N, Sankaran P & Mukunda P G, J Manuf Eng, 3(1)
model does not appear to be over fit and has (2008).
the adequate predictive capability. The predicted 9 Benal Mahagundappa M & Shivand H K, Wear, 262 (2007)
759-763.
model yields an error of 0.0003594 mm3/m, which 10 Miyajima T & Iwa Y, Wear, 255 (2003) 606- 616.
is indicated as standard error of estimate. The 11 Ranganath G, Sharma S C & Krishna M, Wear, 251 (2001)
p-value in the regression summary (Table 4) shows 1408-1413.
the significance of the individual factors which 12 Acharya S K, Prasad N & Shankar Uma, IE (India) J –MM,
87 (2006).
is estimated by the regression modeling procedure. 13 Fernandez J Esteban, Fernandez Madel Rocio, Diaz R
The model estimated at a confidence level of 95% Vijande & Tucho Navarro R, Wear, 255 (2003) 38-43.
with a α-risk of 0.05. 14 Singh Hari & Kumar Pradeep, Indian J Eng Mater Sci, 11
(2004) 19-24.
15 Basavarajappa S & Chandramohan G, J Mater Sci, 21(6)
Validation of the model (2005) 845-850.
The confirmation experiment was performed, by 16 Mishra Ashok K, Sheokand Rakesh & Srivastava R K,
conducting three tests using a specific combination Int J Sci Res Publ, 2(10) (2012).
of the factors and levels which are given in Table 6. 17 Antony J, Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 17 (2001) 134-138.
18 Ross Phillip J, Taguchi techniques for quality engineering,
The theoretical wear rate was estimated using the (McGraw Hill, New York), 2005, 1-179.
developed model Eq. (3). Figure 5 shows the 19 Mahindra K V & Radhakrishna K, Mater Sci Poland, 25(1)
deviation of the theoretical wear rate from the (2007) 57-67.
experimental results. Since the experimental values 20 Ramesh C S, Ahmed R Noor, Mujeeb M A & Abdullah M Z,
are very close to the predicted values, the model is Mater Des, 30 (2009) 1632-1637.
21 Uyyuru R K, Surappa M K & Brusethaug S, Wear, 260
capable of predicting the wear rate in the selected (2006) 1248-1255.
range values. 22 Chung S & Hwang B H, Tribol Int, 27 (1994) 307-314.