Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
HOME ABOUT LAW SCHOOL TIPS LAW SCHOOL STORIES CASE DIGESTS COMMENTARIES
Issue:
Whether or not petitioner’s trademark is a well-known mark protected under
the Paris Convention.
Ruling: YES.
In upholding the right of the petitioner to maintain the present suit before our
courts for unfair competition or infringement of trademarks of a foreign
corporation, we are moreover recognizing our duties and the rights of foreign
states under the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property to
which the Philippines and France are parties.
ADVERTISEMENT
Advertisements
Like
Be the first to like this.
Related
Mirpuri v. CA (G.R. No. 114508) Converse Rubber Corporation v. Philip Morris v. CA (G.R. No.
In "Case Digests" Universal Rubber Products (G.R. 91332)
No. L-27906) In "Case Digests"
In "Case Digests"
This entry was posted in Case Digests, Intellectual Property Law, Mercantile Law and tagged g.r. no. l-63796-97, la
chemise lacoste v. fernandez, paris convention, well-known marks. Bookmark the permalink.
LEAVE A REPLY
Search …
CATEGORIES
ARCHIVES
Select Month
BLOG STATS
77,620 hits
Follow TSTL
Helpful.
Meh.
View Results
Polldaddy.com