Highway and Access Feasibility Report: Assessment For Potential Gypsy and Traveller Sites

Highway and Access Feasibility Report
Assessment for Potential Gypsy and Traveller Sites

London Borough of Lewisham
August 2016 (Updated: October 2016)
DOCUMENT CONTROL
Project Centre has prepared this report in accordance with the instructions from the London Borough
of Lewisham. Project Centre shall not be liable for the use of any information contained herein for
any purpose other than the sole and specific use for which it was prepared.
Report
Issue Description Originator Checked Authorised
Reference
1000003180 01 Draft Tom Wood Ben Meekings Ben Meekings

05.08.16 05.08.16 05.08.16
1000003180 02 Draft 2 Tom Wood Ben Meekings Ben Meekings

12.10.16 12.10.16 12.10.16
CONTACT
Ben Meekings
Associate Director (Transportation Planning)
Ben.Meekings@projectcentre.co.uk
(01273) 627186
38 Foundry Street
Brighton
BN1 4AT
© Project Centre 2016  Highway and Access Feasibility Report i

CONTENTS PAGE PAGE NO.
1. INTRODUCTION 1
2. GUIDANCE DOCUMENTS AND VEHICLE INFORMATION 3
3. APPROACH TO SWEPT PATH ANALYSIS 7
4. SITE A – LAND OFF WESTBOURNE DRIVE 8
5. SITE B –LAND OFF TURNHAM ROAD 0
6. SITE C – NEW CROSS SOCIAL CLUB (KEY SITE) 0
7. SITE D – LAND BEHIND 46-116 BAIZDON ROAD 0
8. SITE E – LAND AT POOL COURT (KEY SITE) 0
9. SITE F – LAND AT ST MILDRED’S ROAD 0
QUALITY 0
APPENDIX A – TRACKING DIAGRAMS: LAND OFF WESTBOURNE DRIVE (SITE A) A
APPENDIX B - TRACKING DIAGRAMS: LAND OFF TURNHAM ROAD (SITE B) B
APPENDIX C – TRACKING DIAGRAMS: NEW CROSS SOCIAL CLUB (SITE C) C
APPENDIX D – TRACKING DIAGRAMS: LAND BEHIND 46-116 BAIZDON ROAD (SITE D) D
APPENDIX E – TRACKING DIAGRAMS: LAND AT POOL COURT (SITE E – SCENARIOS 1 & 2) E
APPENDIX F – TRACKING DIAGRAMS: LAND AT POOL COURT (SITE E – SCENARIO 3) F
APPENDIX G – LAND AT ST MILDRED’S ROAD (SITE F) G
© Project Centre 2016  Highway and Access Feasibility Report ii

1. INTRODUCTION
Background
1.1 The London Borough of Lewisham (LBL) is preparing a draft Gypsy and Traveller Site(s)
Local Plan. The Plan will focus on identifying a potential site or sites to meet the
anticipated future needs of the gypsy and traveller community in Lewisham for
permanent pitches.
1.2 The Council has consulted on Search Parameters and Site Selection Criteria and has
used these to identify potential sites. The current Site Selection Criteria, revised to take
account of comments made during consultation, are attached as Appendix A.
1.3 In summary, the six sites shortlisted for investigation are:
Site A Land on Westbourne Drive (adjacent to St George’s Primary School) SE23
Site B Land off Turnham Road (to north of Honor Oak Adventure Playground) SE4
Site C New Cross Social Club & adjoining land, Horshay Street, SE15
Site D Land at R/O 46-116 Baizdon Road SE3
Site E Land at Pool Court, SE6
Site F Land at St Mildred’s Road, Hither Green, SE12
Commission Brief
1.4 Project Centre Ltd have been commissioned by LBL to carry out an independent
investigation of the proposed access arrangements for all sites. This is to address Criteria
3 and 4 within the Site Selection Criteria as follows:
 Criteria 3: Safe and reasonably convenient access to the road network
a) Safe vehicular access or capable of creating safe vehicular

access for 15m long caravan to/off a public highway
b) Access for emergency services
c) Clearance height of 3.7m.
 Criteria 4: Capable of satisfactory provision for parking, turning, service and

emergency vehicles
a) Judgement (size and shape of site
b) Infrequent access needed for 15m long caravan
© Project Centre 2016  Highway and Access Feasibility Report 1

1.5 The brief raised the following specific issues that should be addressed at each site:
 Width of road that directly serves the site;
 Gradient of road that directly serves the site;
 Height clearance of road that directly serves the site;
 Existing car parking restrictions and parking situation;
 Existing street furniture;
 Swept path analysis for access and egress of the site for:
a) touring caravans;
b) static caravans;
c) fire engine;
d) refuse truck;
 Any necessary mitigation measures that would be necessary to ensure safe and
reasonably convenient access.
 Agreement with the LPA for one vehicular access for each site for testing.

2. GUIDANCE DOCUMENTS AND VEHICLE INFORMATION
2.1 Three documents are relevant in the consideration of appropriate travellers sites and are
used for this assessment:
 Road Vehicles (Construction and Use) Regulations 2010
 Planning Policy for Travellers Sites (2015)
 Designing Gypsy and Traveller Sites: Good Practice Guide (2008) – withdrawn in
September 2015. Use of this guidance document is agreed with LBL.
Road Vehicles (Construction and Use) Regulations 2010
2.2 These regulations specify the maximum permitted size of road vehicles. It is an offence
to tow a trailer which exceeds the relevant width or length as applied below to specified
vehicle types. An online version of the regulation, Standard Instrument No.964 2010, can
be found at:
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2010/964/pdfs/uksi_20100964_en.pdf
Planning Policy for Travellers Sites (August 2015)
2.3 This document set out the Government’s planning policy for traveller sites. The
government’s overarching aim is to ensure fair and equal treatment for travellers in a
way that facilitates the traditional and nomadic way of life of travellers while respecting
the interests of the settled community.
2.4 This guidance document can be found at:
https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/457420/Fi
nal_planning_and_travellers_policy.pdf
2.5 The Department of Communities and Local Government also published ‘Designing
Gypsy and Traveller Sites: Good Practice Guide in May 2008. This was withdrawn in
September 2015, following the publication of the Government’s national Planning Policy
for Travellers Sites. However, the 2008 document provides specific design detail that will
be referenced in this report and this approach is agreed by LBL.
2.6 The 2008 guidance can be found at:
https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/11439/de
signinggypsysites.pdf

Vehicle Information
2.7 The sites will be assessed against use by the following vehicles as stated in the brief:
touring caravans, static caravans, fire engines and refuse collection vehicles.
2.8 Touring caravans may typically need to arrive and depart a site infrequently throughout
the year, while larger static caravans typically remain in-situ for several years at a time.
Touring Caravans
2.9 Members of the gypsy and traveller community will generally use both a touring
caravan, towed onto a pitch by another vehicle and a larger mobile home (static
caravan) as their main residence.
2.10 According to the ‘Road Vehicles (Construction and Use) Regulations 2010’ the maximum
size of a trailer towed by a vehicle is 2.55m wide by 12m long.
2.11 After checking current brochures from five caravan manufacturers (Elddis, Swift, Hobby,
Bailey and Coachman), the widest model available was found to be 2.50m wide.
Static Caravans
2.12 According to the Communities and Local Government ‘Design Gypsy and Traveller Sites
– Good Practice Guidance’ adopted in May 2008, access roads and site design should
be capable of providing sufficient space for manoeuvrability of average size trailers of
up to 15 metres in length. Where feasible, accessibility should be considered for larger
mobile homes if land permits this; however, a survey of major manufacturers indicates
that the largest mobile homes available are approximately 15m long. As such, the sites
included in this report have been tested with an 18.5m articulated vehicle, the largest
theoretically permitted on British roads, which is capable of transporting a 15m caravan.
Fire Engines
2.13 The Fire Safety Guidance Note (GN29) ‘Access for Fire Appliances’ produced by the
London Fire Brigade, covers the access arrangements needed for fire appliances to get
close enough to a building to fight a fire.
2.14 It details such requirements as minimum widths, turning circles, road humps and
projections from buildings. It is primarily aimed at developers and architects for planning
reference. The complete document can be found at:
http://www.london-fire.gov.uk/Documents/FOIA629.1.pdf
2.15 GN29 provides a summary of the recommended vehicle access specifications as given
in the table below:

Table 3.1 Typical Vehicle Access Specifications (GN29)
2.16 The above recommended dimensions are also comparable with the DCLG document
‘Designing Gypsy and Travellers Sites’ which states ‘vehicular access and gateways must
be at least 3.1m wide and have a minimum clearance of 3.7m. This is common with
both Building Regulations 2000 B5 and paragraph 6.7.2 of Manual for Streets (MfS) 2007.
2.17 However, paragraph 6.7.3 of MfS states “Simply to reach a fire, the access route could
be reduced to 2.75m over short distances”. This information was provided specifically by
The Association of Chief Fire Officers.
Refuse Collection Vehicles
2.18 The document titled ‘Standards for the Design and Construction of Roads in the London
Borough of Lewisham, December 2015’ specifies the minimum dimensions of turning
facilities on page 19. Vehicle swept paths for 11.2m length refuse vehicles should be
demonstrated.
2.19 The complete document can be found at the following website address:
https://www.lewisham.gov.uk/myservices/transport/road-
safety/Documents/Standards%20for%20the%20Design%20and%20Construction%20of%
20Roads%20in%20the%20Londn%20Borough%20of%20Lewisham%202015%20Version
%201.pdf
2.20 The guidance also advises the maximum haul for bins is 10m from the collection point
to the kerb line and that reversing should be minimised where possible. MfS advises a
reversing distance of no more than 12m.
Visibility Requirements
2.21 If a caravan or trailer is wider than the towing vehicle, suitable towing mirrors are
required.

2.22 Paragraph 15.2.4.3.2 of ‘ECE Regulation 46’ states mirrors should allow for a field of vision
that is 4m wide at a point 20m back from the driver’s ocular point. This creates a
triangular visibility envelope, with the parallel edge of this triangle in line with the edge of
the vehicle (trailer). The mirrors must be mounted to the towing vehicle, and as a
minimum are equal to the width of the trailer. Figure 1, below, shows the field of vision
and requirements.
Figure 1 – Towing Mirror Visibility Requirements
2.23 An online version can be accessed at:
http://www.unece.org/trans/main/wp29/wp29regs41-60.html
2.24 According to ‘Road Vehicles (Construction and Use) Regulations’ and ‘ECE Regulation
46’ paragraph 15.2.2.6 states the maximum distance any mirror below a height of 2m
can protrude beyond the width of the towing vehicle or trailer is 20cm. This means a
vehicle towing a 2.55m wide touring caravan could legally have a maximum overall
width including mirrors of 2.95m in total, while a vehicle towing a 3.40m static caravan
unit could legally have a maximum overall width (including mirrors) of 3.80m in total.
2.25 It should be noted, that on a road with a low usable width, either the nearside or offside
mirror (depending on vehicle direction) could therefore in practice overhang the
kerb/footway by 250mm.

3. APPROACH TO SWEPT PATH ANALYSIS
3.1 As this report is a feasibility study designed to assess the suitability of sites, swept path
analysis focuses on the ability of vehicles to enter, exit and turn within the site. No site
internal designs are currently available in order to judge the ability of vehicles to
navigate the site internally without conflicting with site users and features.
3.2 Furthermore, it is assumed that if an 18.5 articulated vehicle, transporting a 15m static
caravan, can access and turn within a site, both refuse and emergency vehicles will
also be able to do so. Attempting to consider more specific elements, such as the
ability of refuse vehicles to manoeuvre within a certain distance of waste storage areas
is not currently useful given the lack of site designs.
3.3 Lastly, all swept path analysis included in this report is based on Ordinance Survey (OS)
mapping, which is accurate to approximately 0.5m.

4. SITE A – LAND OFF WESTBOURNE DRIVE
Existing Situation
4.1 The site is a local park on the west side of Westbourne. It is bounded by St George’s
Primary School, which is accessible from Perry Vale, immediately to the north and west.
There are also two-storey houses fronting Perry Vale which border the site’s southwest. To
the east, the site is bounded directly by Westbourne Street, and by four and five-story
blocks of flats to the southeast and south.
4.2 A plan of the site demonstrating the highway boundary in green is shown in Figure 5.1.
Figure 5.1: Site Location and Highway Boundary
4.3 Westbourne Drive is a public highway with a 20mph speed limit and a series of speed
cushions.
4.4 The carriageway (kerb to kerb) is approximately 10.5m wide with footways on both sides
being approximately 2.8m.
4.5 Major findings relating to this site, with the exception of those shown by the swept path
analysis, are shown Table 5.2.

Table 5.2: Major Findings made via Observation
Assessment criteria Measure Observations
Width of road serving site 10.5m Sufficient for two way flow
Gradient of road Level
Tree foliage does not infringe on height
Height clearance >4.5m
clearance.
No parking restrictions aside from junction
Off-site parking restrictions None
protection.
Car parking observed on both sides of
Daytime
Off-site parking conditions Westbourne Drive, estimated at 80%
observation
occupancy
Street Lighting present, pedestrian guard-railing
Street furniture -
at site accesses
Site Access
4.6 A preferred location for the site’s vehicle access is shown in Appendix A as part of the
swept path analysis carried out on this site.
4.7 A number of trees lining the site boundary and highway were noted and are shown in
Appendix A. The site access should not require the removal of any of these features,
although tree canopies may require some maintenance to ensure adequate height
clearance.
4.8 Pedestrian guard railing was noted in the footway at each northern and southern
pedestrian access. The guard railing at the northern access point would require removal
to provide the vehicle access.
4.9 At the time of the site visit (Tuesday 26th July 11:00am), Westbourne Drive was observed
to experience a high level of on-street car parking. Parking will need to be restricted
across the site’s entrance leading to a reduction in on-street capacity. Given the site’s
development, a daytime and overnight parking survey should be considered to
demonstrate that a reduction in parking capacity can be met elsewhere in the close
vicinity.
4.10 Visibility from this access exceeds the minimum 25m stopping site distance outlined
within Manual for Streets (MfS) 2007 for a highway with a 20mph speed limit.
4.11 Table 5.3 provides a summary of the swept path analysis, detailing the ability of each
type of vehicle’s ability to access the site, potential obstructions and possible mitigation
measures for conflicts. Relevant tracking diagrams can be found in Appendix A.

Table 5.3: Swept Path Analysis Study: Land off Westbourne Drive (See Appendix A)
Ability to
Ability to access
Type of Vehicle complete turn Possible Conflicts / Issues Possible Mitigation
the site
within the site
1. On exiting the site, vehicles turning 2. Restriction of parking north and

Car and 12m Touring Caravan ✓ ✓ south will conflict with cars parked south of the site entrance on the
along the opposite road side. opposite side of the road. This will
2. Vehicles entering and exiting the site will result in the loss of a minimum of
18.5m Articulated Lorry, conflict with vehicles on the opposite four parking spaces.
transporting a 15m Caravan
✓ ✓ side of the road both north and south
of the site.
The ability of the articulated lorry proves
Emergency Vehicle ✓* ✓* that this vehicle will also be able to
access the site.
Refuse Vehicle ✓* ✓* that this vehicle will also be able to
access the site.
*This vehicle will be able to complete necessary manoeuvres, based on the completion of these manoeuvres by the 15m Articulated Lorry.
4.12 Overall, this indicates that vehicles up to an 18.5m articulated vehicles transporting a 15m static caravan should be able to access the site,
following the restriction of parking opposite the site on Westbourne Drive and across the site access. Parking spaces would be lost as a result of
this development, making the need for parking beat surveys important in ensuring overspill can be locally accommodated.

5. SITE B –LAND OFF TURNHAM ROAD
Existing Situation
5.1 The site comprises grassed amenity space that forms part of the Honor Oak Housing
Estate. It is located directly to the rear (east) of Spalding House, a four storey block of 44
flats that fronts Turnham Road.
5.2 The land comprises a grassed mound that rises up by approximately 3 to 4m to form an
embankment for the railway line along its eastern edge. The southern boundary is
formed by a Multi Use Games Area (MUGA) and beyond that the Honor Oak Adventure
Playground. Its northern boundary is formed by an access road off Turnham Rioad (a
pedestrian/cycle bridge which crosses the railway to link with Dalrymple Road) and the
Honor Oak Health Centre.
5.4 Major findings relating to this site, with the exception of those shown by the swept path
analysis, are shown Table 6.2.

Width of access road to the rear of Spalding
Width of access road 4.8m
House
Gradient of the access road to the rear of
Gradient of road 1.68%
Spalding House
Height clearance >4.5m Nothing observed
Off-site parking restrictions None No parking restrictions
Daytime On-street car parking available, observed at
Off-site parking conditions
observation cc50% occupancy
Street furniture - System of speed tables and street lighting
Removal of parking spaces covering site’s
Other
entrance

Site Access
5.5 In the vicinity of the proposed site access, the carriageway (kerb to kerb) is
approximately 4.8m wide.
5.6 A preferred location for the site’s vehicle access is shown in Appendix B as part of the
swept path analysis carried out on this site. Visibly, the proposed site access point is
suggested to be served off the access road to the rear of Spalding House. This access
road is noted as not being publicly maintained highway.
5.7 Turnham Road is a public highway with a series of speed tables. At the time of the site
visit (Tuesday 26th July 11:30am), there were plenty of parking opportunities in the
immediate vicinity of the site. Cars were parked directly across and opposite the
proposed entrance while a review of Google StreetView images indicates that parking
occurs along the length of the existing access road.
5.8 The development of this site may mean the restriction of parking along this road. Parking
surveys should be considered to demonstrate that any reduction in parking capacity
caused by this development can be met in alternative capacity nearby.
5.9 Two trees adjacent to the site’s proposed access were noted and are shown in
Appendix B; however, their removal should not be necessary to ensure vehicular access.
Maintenance of tree canopies would be necessary in order to ensure necessary height
clearance for vehicles visiting this site.
5.10 Visibility from this access should not pose an issue given the layout of the surrounding
area.
5.11 Table 6.3 provides a summary of the swept path analysis for this site, detailing the ability
of each type of vehicle’s ability to access and turn within it, potential obstructions and
possible mitigation measures to resolve conflicts. Relevant tracking diagrams can be
found in Appendix B.

Table 6.3: Swept Path Analysis Study: Land off Turnham Road (See Appendix B)
Ability to
Ability to access
the site
within the site
1. Parking spaces blocking site 1. Removal of parking spaces across

Car and 12m Touring Caravan ✓ ✓ the sites entrance.
entrance
2. Parking on the access road behind 2. Restriction of parking directly
Spaulding House is likely to block the behind Spaulding House, most
access of these vehicles. likely on both sides. This is
3. Vehicle cannot complete the turn estimated to displace up to 5
18.5m Articulated Lorry, from Turnham Road without vehicles.
x N/A mounting the kerb. 3. None
4. Vehicle crosses the kerbs on both 4. Widening of the access road.
sides when turning into the access
road running behind Spaulding
House.
Emergency Vehicle ✓* ✓* that this vehicle will also be able to
access the site.
Refuse Vehicle ✓ ✓ that this vehicle will also be able to
access the site.
*Fire Engines will be able to complete the necessary manoeuvres, based on the completion of these manoeuvres by the refuse vehicle which is both larger and less manoeuvrable.
5.12 Overall, this indicates that cars and touring caravans up to 12m long, refuse vehicles and fire engines are able to access this site and complete
a turning manoeuvre without significant conflicts. However, an articulated vehicle transporting a 15m caravan will be unable to access the site.
Parking spaces would be lost as a result of this development, making the need for parking beat surveys important in ensuring overspill can be
locally accommodated.

6. SITE C – NEW CROSS SOCIAL CLUB (KEY SITE)
Existing Situation
6.1 The site is currently used as a community hall for events at the western half and a Multi
Use Games Area (MUGA) at the eastern half.
6.2 On the west side of the community hall, there is a car park for approximately 25 cars
and a vehicle access onto Hornshay Street.
6.3 The London Overground line, between Surrey Quays and Clapham Junction runs along
the southern border of the site. A pedestrian underpass provides a link between
Hornshay Street and John Willis Close to the east.
6.4 The South London railway line crosses Hornshay Street on a bridge immediately to the
west of the existing access and forms the western border of the site (See Figure 7.1). To
the west of this bridge are a number of open yard motor-trade and builder related
businesses.
Figure 7.1: Existing site access and railway bridge over Hornshay Street
6.5 A plan of the site demonstrating the highway boundary in green is shown in Figure 7.2
while major findings, with the exception of those shown by the swept path analysis, are
shown Table 7.3.

Existing car parking both sides reduces running

width to approximately 3.8m
Gradient of road Level
Bridge headroom is 4.5m. No other height
Height clearance 4.5m
constraints noted.
Unrestricted parking along both sides of the
street
Daytime On-street car parking available, observed at
observation approximately 80% occupancy
Street lighting would likely require relocating to
Street furniture -
provide new eastern access point
Site Access
approximately 7.8m wide. Footways are approximately 2m wide.
6.7 Hornshay Street is a public highway and has a 20mph speed limit restriction. The site
access point is proposed on Hornshay Street at the centre of the site’s northern
boundary.
6.8 Visibility from this access exceeds the minimum 25m stopping site distance outlined
within Manual for Streets (MfS) 2007 for a highway with a 20mph speed limit.
6.9 Car parking in Hornshay Street is generally uncontrolled, apart from junction protection
and some double yellow restrictions at the road’s eastern end. At the time of the site visit
(Tuesday 26th July 12:00pm), on-street parking occupancy was estimated at
approximately 80%, indicating the potential for parking stress at peak times. Parked
vehicles were observed on both sides, effectively narrowing carriageway width to
approximately 3.8m, which should be sufficient for emergency access. Parking is

predicted to be a mixture of residential and commercial, which would be connected
with the adjacent business uses.
6.10 Vehicles were observed parking in the unrestricted space covering the proposed access
point; as such, the creation of this access will reduce the total number of spaces
available and displace vehicles already parking here. In order to ensure this does not
present a significant problem, an analysis of local parking stress based on occupancy
surveys would be advised.
of each type of vehicle to access and turn within it, potential obstructions and possible
mitigation measures to resolve conflicts. Relevant tracking diagrams can be found in
Appendix C.

Table 7.4: Swept Path Analysis Study: New Cross Social Club (See Appendix C)
Ability to
Ability to access complete
Type of Vehicle Possible Conflicts / Issues Possible Mitigation
the site turn within
the site
x 1. Restriction of parking adjacent and

1. Conflicts with parked vehicles on both opposite the site entrance using
(unless on-street sides of the street will occur in both
Car and 12m Touring Caravan parking is restricted ✓ single or double yellow lines. This will
directions in close proximity to the likely result in the loss of
around the access.
proposed access) approximately 6 parking spaces.
2. A very wide site entrance will be 2. Restriction of parking along the
required for vehicles of this size to enter length of the street on days / at
the site in this location. times when vehicles comparable to
x 3. Conflicts with parked vehicles on both the 18.5m articulated lorry require
sides of the street will occur in both access to the site.
18.5m Articulated Lorry, (unless on-street
✓ directions along the majority of the 3. Larger and articulated vehicles will
transporting a 15m Caravan parking is restricted
street. need to be guided into and out of
when these vehicles
4. In order to enter the site without the site access to prevent conflict
require access)
providing a hammerhead turning with other vehicles, particularly
circle, these vehicles will be required to when reversing into the site.
reverse into the site. 4. The site entrance should be
designed so as to ensure refuse
5. Unless otherwise agreed, the maximum
and consequently emergency
Emergency Vehicle ✓* ✓* reversing distance for emergency
vehicles not need to reverse more
vehicles is 12m.
than 12m.
6. Unless otherwise agreed, the maximum
Refuse Vehicle ✓* ✓* reversing distance for refuse vehicles is
12m.
*Fire Engines and Refuse Vehicles will be able to complete the necessary manoeuvres, based on the completion of these manoeuvres by the refuse vehicle which is both larger and less
manoeuvrable.

6.12 Overall, this indicates that all vehicles required are able to enter the site, although
access by cars with touring caravans measuring 12.5m will require the loss of
approximately 6 spaces. Larger and articulated vehicles will conflict with existing parking
arrangements along the majority of the street and will require a very wide site access.

7. SITE D – LAND BEHIND 46-116 BAIZDON ROAD
Existing Situation
7.1 The site is a strip of grassed amenity space on the southern edge of the Baizdon Road
Estate to the rear of 46 to 116 Baizdon Road. It is also bordered by housing to the south
and a small access road to the west, providing access to compound garages on
private property owned by LBL.
7.3 Major findings related to this site and relevant to this investigation, with the exception of
those shown by the subsequent swept path analysis, are shown Table 8.2.

Gradient of road Level Level at proposed point of access
Height clearance >4.5m No height constraints noted.
Site is within a Controlled Parking Zone (Mon to
Off-site parking restrictions CPZ
Sat 9am-7pm)
Daytime On-street car parking observed at cc50%
observation occupancy
Street lighting present. Off-street parking bays
Street furniture - would require removal to provide new eastern
access point
Other Removal of three parking spaces

Site Access
approximately 5.3m wide. Footways are present on both sides and are approximately
1.8m wide.
7.5 Baizdon Road is a public highway in a residential area with occasional full width speed
tables. The street is also within a controlled parking zone (CPZ).
7.6 Access to the site is proposed from its north-eastern corner. This will require the removal
of three parking bays, associated features including bollards and several trees in close
proximity within the site’s boundaries in order to permit vehicle access. The access is
shown below in Figure 8.3.
Figure 8.3: Potential site access and view of the site from Baizdon Road looking west
7.7 Double yellow lines prevent parking in close proximity to the site; as such, this should not
pose an obstruction to vehicles entering the site.
of each type of vehicle’s ability to access and turn within it, potential obstructions and
possible mitigation measures to resolve conflicts. Relevant tracking diagrams can be
found in Appendix D.

Table 8.4: Swept Path Analysis Study: Land behind 46 – 116 Baizdon Road (See Appendix D)
Ability to
Ability to access
the site
within the site
1. None.
Car and 12m Touring Caravan ✓ ✓ None
1. This vehicle is unable to enter the site,

18.5m Articulated Lorry,
x N/A mounting kerbs on both sides of the
road in multiple locations.
Due to the considerable failure
experienced by the articulated lorry,
Emergency Vehicle x N/A testing for this vehicle was not
completed.
Due to the considerable failure
experienced by the articulated lorry,
Refuse Vehicle x N/A testing for this vehicle was not
completed.
7.9 Overall, this indicates that vehicles larger/less manoeuvrable than the car and touring caravan will be unable to access this site, indicating that it
is largely inaccessible and unsuitable for development.

8. SITE E – LAND AT POOL COURT (KEY SITE)
Existing Situation
8.1 The site is on open land at the rear of Pool Court residential development and an
adjoining scaffolding yard. It has a vehicular access on Fordmill Road, which allows the
access of larger, industrial vehicles. The site is bound by Pool Court road and a railway
line to the west; Fordmill Road to the south; a second elevated railway line to the east;
and Ravensbourne River to the north.
Table 9.2: Major Findings via Observation

Fordmill Rd 7.5m
Width of access road
Pool Court 4.9m
Gradient of road Level Level at both proposed access points
Bridge headroom is in excess of 4.5m. Some
Height clearance >4.5m tree canopies may require cutting back in Pool
Court.
No on-street parking restrictions except junction
Off-site parking
None and access protection with single and double
restrictions
yellow lines.
A high level of on-street car parking observed
both sides of Fordmill Road. Parking in Pool
Off-site parking Daytime
Court was mainly provided in designed parking
conditions observation
areas though some kerbside parking was
available.
Street lighting and full width speed tables
Street furniture -
present on Fordmill Road.

Site Access
8.4 As previously stated, there is an existing site access onto Fordmill Road which is designed
to service the Scaffolding Yard. This access could also be used to service a future
traveller site and is shown in Figure 9.3.
Figure 9.3: Fordmill Road existing site entrance
8.5 Fordsmill Road is a public highway in a residential area with occasional full width speed
tables. It is marked with cycle symbols and has part footway, part carriageway parking
bays on both sides of the street in the vicinity of the existing access.
8.6 A second access is also proposed in a turning head provided on at the northern end of
Pool Court’s eastern section; this turning head is shown in Figure 9.4 below.
Figure 9.4: Pool Court potential site access

8.7 Using this location to access the site would require the kerb lining at the end the turning
head to be dropped for the vehicular entrance.
8.8 The location of each of these accesses is shown in the tracking diagrams in Appendix E.
As part of this investigation, three scenarios have been considered, including:
1. Using the existing entrance to the Scaffolding site for all vehicle access;
2. Closing the existing access to the Scaffolding site and creating a new access on
the Pool Court turning head for all vehicle access; and
3. Creating a new access on the Pool Court turning head and allowing vehicles to
manoeuvre through the site between the two accesses.
8.9 At the time of the site visit (Tuesday 26th July 1:00pm), Fordmill Road was observed to
experience a high level of on-street car parking; however, it is unlikely that vehicle
movements would significantly impact this capacity as this is an existing entrance
already facilitates the movements of large vehicles. Pool Court is on an area of double
yellow lines; therefore the impact of the access is not likely to lead to any reduction in
on-street parking capacity in this area.
of each type of vehicle to access and turn within it, potential obstructions and possible
mitigation measures to resolve conflicts. Relevant tracking diagrams can be found in
Appendices E and F.

Table 9.5: Swept Path Analysis Study: Land at Pool Court
Ability to
Ability to access
the site
within the site
Scenario 1 – Scaffolding Site Access Only (See Appendix E)
1. Widening of the existing access

Car and 12m Touring Caravan ✓ ✓ None 2. Adjustment of the dropped
1. A larger access than is currently kerb/ bellmouth fronting the
provided will be required in this scenario existing access.
2. Vehicles are likely to overrun the kerb
18.5m Articulated Lorry, when exiting the site.
✓ ✓ 3. A large amount of on-site space will be
required for vehicles of this size to enter,
navigate and turn within the site if
entering from this location.
As this is an existing entrance, it has already
Emergency Vehicle ✓* ✓* been developed to allow the access of this
vehicle class.
As this is an existing entrance, it has already
Refuse Vehicle ✓* ✓* been developed to allow the access of this
vehicle class.

Ability to
Ability to access
the site
within the site
Scenario 2 – New Access within the Pool Court Turning Head Only (See Appendix E)
1. Geometry alterations will be

required at the proposed
1. Vehicles are predicted to overrun the access point to allow vehicles
18.5m Articulated Lorry, like the 18.5m Articulated Lorry
✓ ✓ kerb when accessing Pool Court from
transporting a 15m Caravan to access the site.
Fordmill Road.
2. The tree to the proposed
Emergency Vehicle * ✓* ✓* None access’ east may need to be
removed to allow access
following these geometry
alterations.
Refuse Vehicle ✓* ✓* None 3. Kerb re-alignment at the
entrance to Pool Court to allow
access by larger vehicles.

Ability to
Ability to access
the site
within the site
Scenario 3 – Use of Both Accesses (See Appendix F)
Car and 12m Touring Caravan N/A None 1. Widening of the existing access
✓
on Fordmill Road
1. A larger access than is currently 2. Adjustment of the dropped
provided on Fordmill Road will be kerb/ bellmouth fronting the
required in this scenario existing access on Fordmill
2. Vehicles are predicted to overrun the Road
✓ N/A kerb when accessing Pool Court from 3. Kerb re-alignment at the
Fordmill Road. entrance to Pool Court to allow
3. A large amount of on-site space will be access by larger vehicles.
required for vehicles of this size to enter,
navigate and exit the site in this fashion.
Emergency Vehicle ✓* N/A None
Refuse Vehicle ✓* N/A None

*Fire Engines and Refuse Vehicles will be able to complete the necessary manoeuvres, based on the completion of these manoeuvres by the 18.5m articulated vehicle which is both larger
and less manoeuvrable.

8.11 Overall, this swept path analysis indicates that all vehicles will be able to enter the site in
all three scenarios. Vehicles movements are not predicted to have a significant impact
on parking capacity in any scenario.
8.12 However, it is clear that if retained, the access onto Fordmill Road will need to be
widened in order to allow the largest vehicles expected to access the site. Furthermore,
18.5m articulated vehicles are predicted to overrun the kerb on Fordmill Road when
turning onto Pool Court and when exiting the site from the existing entrance, indicating
the need for kerb re-alignment in each location.
8.13 In scenarios 1 and 3, where the Fordmill Road / Scaffold Site entrance is used, large
areas of the site will be required for the movement of vehicles within the site due to the
narrowness of the site’s eastern section.

9. SITE F – LAND AT ST MILDRED’S ROAD
Existing Situation
9.1 Site F is on an area of open land 5.3ha in size previously used as part of the Hither Green
railway sidings and currently housing a horse riding stables, named the ‘Willow tree Riding
Establishment’, which covers approximately 2ha. It is privately owned by Oceanwave
Estates Ltd.
9.2 Bordering the site is a series of 17 council-owned allotments that cover approximately
1.73ha to the north, and two-storey houses fronting onto Rayford Avenue and Ronver
Road to the east. More open land previously used as railroad sidings are located to the
south while active sidings line the eastern boundary.
Figure 10.1: Site Location (Highway boundary in green)

Table 10.2: Major Findings via Observation
7.2m Ronver
Road;
Width of access road
Rayford Avenue
3.2m
Gradient of road Level Level at both proposed access points
Height clearance >4.5m
Unrestricted at the boundary of either
access
Some parking was observed around both
Daytime
Off-site parking conditions accesses, with individuals parking on the
observation
footway in several instances
Street lighting systems in place along
Street furniture
Rayford Avenue and Ronver Road
Site Access
9.5 The site currently has two access points, each of which might be used to service the
new development.
9.6 Firstly, vehicles can reach the site from Rayford Avenue via an access road which runs
along the rear of houses fronting onto South Circular Road and services the allotments
running along the site’s northern boundary. This is a very narrow access road, measuring
only 3.2m when measured on the site visit (Tuesday 26th July 2:00pm).
9.7 Secondly, vehicles can reach the site from Ronver Road via the vehicular access to the
‘Willow tree Riding Establishment’. This wider entrance, measuring 7.2m on the site visit,
represents the more suitable candidate for a development of this nature and is shown in
Figure 10.3.
Table 10.3: Ronver Road Access to Site F

9.8 An unmade road running between these two accesses running to the rear of the two-
storey houses fronting onto Rayford Avenue and Ronver Avenue provides a link between
the accesses and to several individual garages.
9.9 At the time of the site visit, there was parking in close proximity to both accesses, with
some of this located on footways. Although this parking would not have likely caused an
obstruction to the accesses, it is predicted that parking restrictions immediately adjacent
and opposite to the accesses, particularly on Rayford Avenue, will need to be
reconsidered to prevent conflicts.
9.10 Table 10.4 provides a summary of the swept path analysis for this site, detailing the
ability of each type of vehicle’s ability to access and turn within it, potential obstructions
and possible mitigation measures to resolve conflicts. Relevant tracking diagrams can
be found in Appendix G.

Table 10.4: Swept Path Analysis Study: Land at St Mildred’s Road (See Appendix G)
Ability to
Ability to access
the site
within the site
Rayford Avenue Access
1. Vehicles will be unable to access the 1. None. This access is unsuitable for
site without overrunning the kerbs on this nature of development.
the access road’s junction with
Car and 12m Touring Caravan x N/A
Rayford Avenue and will be unable
to enter the site without colliding with
bordering structures.
The inability of car and touring caravan
to successfully navigate this entrance
18.5m Articulated Lorry, and the connecting access road
x N/A
transporting a 15m Caravan negate the need to complete this
tracking. However, it is displayed for
reference in Appendix G.
Emergency Vehicle x N/A and the connecting access road
negate the need to complete this
tracking.
Refuse Vehicle x N/A and the connecting access road
negate the need to complete this
tracking.

Ability to
Ability to access
the site
within the site
Ronver Road Access

✓ ✓ None
Emergency Vehicle ✓* ✓*
Refuse Vehicle ✓* ✓*
*Fire Engines and Refuse Vehicles will be able to complete the necessary manoeuvres, based on the completion of these manoeuvres by the 18.5m articulated vehicle which is both larger
and less manoeuvrable.
9.11 Overall, this analysis confirms that the Ronver Road access is suitable to service this nature of development and should not require any major
alterations in order to be fit for purpose, with the exception of reviewing the parking restrictions in close proximity on Ronver Road.

Quality
It is the policy of Project Centre to supply Services that meet or exceed our clients’ expectations of
Quality and Service. To this end, the Company's Quality Management System (QMS) has been
structured to encompass all aspects of the Company's activities including such areas as Sales,
Design and Client Service.
By adopting our QMS on all aspects of the Company, Project Centre aims to achieve the following
objectives:
 Ensure a clear understanding of customer requirements;
 Ensure projects are completed to programme and within budget;
 Improve productivity by having consistent procedures;
 Increase flexibility of staff and systems through the adoption of a common approach to
staff appraisal and training;
 Continually improve the standard of service we provide internally and externally;
 Achieve continuous and appropriate improvement in all aspects of the company;
Our Quality Management Manual is supported by detailed operational documentation. These relate
to codes of practice, technical specifications, work instructions, Key Performance Indicators, and
other relevant documentation to form a working set of documents governing the required work
practices throughout the Company.
All employees are trained to understand and discharge their individual responsibilities to ensure the
effective operation of the Quality Management System.

APPENDIX A – TRACKING DIAGRAMS: LAND OFF WESTBOURNE
DRIVE (SITE A)
© Project Centre 2013  Highway and Access Feasibility Report A

This map is reproduced from Ordnance Survey material with the permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office © Crown copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. (100032379) ( 2016) | Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright and database right (2016)
22
-2%
5%
Copy of Luxury 4x4 +Twin Axle Caravan
(20 6)
Garage
Pikethorne Myrtle
Copy of Luxury 4x4 +Twin Axle Caravan (20 6)

2.91
Lodge
| PLOT DATE: 05/08/2016 14:30:28 |

10.15
o
10
L E
o
VA
o
CH
Copy of Luxu
o
r
y 4x4 +Twin
Uncontrolled
UR
o
Axle Car van
51 to 74
(20 6)
CH
36
o
Christ Church
o5 t
o
C of E
0
Street
Primary School
o
o
Parking - On
n (20 6)
o
+Twin Axle Carava
Copy of Luxury 4x4
o
o
bot
o
h sides
1t
o3
o
El Sub Sta
5
o
o
CAD REFERENCE: \\itservices.local\shared$\Project Centre Brighton\Brighton\CAD\00-PROJECT\1000003180\1000003180-2-611.dwg | PPatel3 | ---- |

o
45
o
28
1
o
Fo
o
Andrew un
tai
o
Court nC
ou
o
rt
oo
Pikethorne
22
7
2.91
o
10.15
o
ISE
o
Copy of Lux
ury 4x4 +Tw
o
in Axle Car
R
van (20 6)
49
o
CH
Uncontrolle
o
WESTBOUR
UR
51 to 74
56
15
36
14
o
Christ Church
CH
to
o
C of E
5
o
0
Copy of Luxury 4x4
d Street Parki
+Twin Axle Caravan
Primary School
)
win Axle Caravan (20 6
(20 6)
Copy of Luxury 4x4 +T
o
55
ng - On both
-16%
NE DRIVE
o
66
o o
WESTBOUR
sides
o
El Sub Sta
62
o
6.96
4.972
20
1 to
e
o
101
odg
103
105
o
eL
28
Val
1
o
Max 90° Horiz
4.877 Max 10° Vert
NE DRIVE
PE
o
0.897 2.88
Valentine Andrew 3.933 1.4 2.78
RR
o
Court Court
Copy of Luxury 4x4 +Twin Axle Caravan (2006)
Y
o
Overall Length 12.990m
VA
o
Overall Width 2.550m
LE
Copy of Luxury 4x4 +T Overall Body Height 2.545m
o
win Axle Caravan (20
06) Min Body Ground Clearance 0.272m
22
Max Track Width 2.550m
7
o
6%
Lock-to-lock time 4.00s

Curb to Curb Turning Radius 5.800m
E
88
RIS
32 to
21
CH
Rev Date Description Drn Chk App 4th Floor Westgate House, Westgate, Ealing, London W5 1YY - Tel: +44 (0)20-7421-8222 - Fax: +44 (0)20-7421-8199 - Email: info@projectcentre.co.uk
UR
Client Project Drawn Designed Drawing Status
HIGHWAY AND ACCESS FEASIBILITY STUDY
CH
ASSESSMENT FOR POTENTIAL LEWISHAM GYPSY AND TRAVELLER SITES
PP TW FOR INFORMATION
Drawing title Scale Drawing No. Rev.
SWEPT PATH ANALYSIS
NTS 1000003180-2-611-01 -
SITE A - WESTBOURNE STREET
Office Registered in England No. 02625312 | 4th Floor Westgate House, Westgate, Ealing, London, W5 1YY | www.projectcentre.co.uk
BOURNE DR
22
IVE
-18%
9% 2 - 15m touring caravan
on tractor trailer
Myrtle
2 - 15m touring caravan on tractor trailer

Garage
Lodge
| PLOT DATE: 05/08/2016 14:09:12 |

2 - 15m to
2.91 Pikethorne
uring cara
o
10.15
van on tract
10
or trailer
o
o
o o
Uncontrolled
o
51 to 74
36
o
Christ Church E
AL
o5 t
o
C of E HV
0
C
Street Parkin
Primary School UR
WESTBOUR
o
CH
o
trailer
tractor
o
ravan on
touring ca
2 - 15m
g - On both
o
o
1t
o3
o
5
sides
o
El Sub Sta
NE DRIVE

o
o
o
45
o
28
1
o
Fo
o
Andrew un
E
tai
RIS
o
Court nC
ou
o
CH
rt
o
Pikethorne
UR
2.91
o
10.15
o
CH
22
7
o
2 - 15m
o
touring
caravan
on tract
or traile
o
r
o
49
Uncontrolle
o
51 to 74
36
o
Christ Church
56
15
to
14
o
C of E
5
o
0
d Street Parki
Primary School
2 - 15m to
o
uring cara
van on tra
o
ctor trailer
55
o
ractor trailer
ng - On both
o
g caravan on t
2 - 15m tourin
o
66
17%
sides
o
El Sub Sta
o
15
6.16
62
o
20
1 to
e
o
101
odg
103
105
28
eL
1
o
Val
o
Andrew Max 90° Horiz
E
Max 10° Vert
RIS
4.48
o
Valentine 1.36
Court
3.8
8.5 1.33 1.33 2.87
CH
Court
o
UR
o
CH
22
2 - 15m tour
ing caravan Overall Body Height 3.870m
7
o
on tractor tra
iler Min Body Ground Clearance 0.515m
2% Max Track Width 2.470m
88
32 to
21

SWEPT PATH ANALYSIS
NTS 1000003180-2-611-02 -
SITE A - WESTBOURNE STREET
APPENDIX B - TRACKING DIAGRAMS: LAND OFF TURNHAM ROAD
(SITE B)
© Project Centre 2013  Highway and Access Feasibility Report B

El Su Health Centre
b Sta 17 to
44
Welf
are C
| PLOT DATE: 05/08/2016 14:33:37 |

Health Centre e ntre
17 to
44
Welf Parking stalls to be removed

are C
entre
OAD
25.0
6
1
10.9
MR
Parking stalls to be removed
r trailer
NHA
cto
caravan on tra
2 - 15m touring
OAD
25.0
6
ided
1
stalls1 to 44
10.9
TUR
MR
prov
Spalding

ailer
House
tractor tr
(20 6)
in Axle Caravan
ravan on
4x4 +Tw
NHA
Copy of Luxury
touring ca
g
2 - 15m
arkin
2 - 15m
touring
caravan
vided
on tract
lls pro 4
-30%
or traile
ted p
TUR
r
g sta 1 to 4
Spalding
n (20 6)
+Twin Axle Carava
igna
Copy of Luxury 4x4
House
, des
Copy of Luxu
ry 4x4 +Twin A
xle Car van (
20 6)
in
g
-14%
arkin
park
44
ed p
1 to
ated
Spalding
ntroll
sign
House
g, de
Unco
arkin
44
ed p
1 to
Spalding
ntroll
House
Unco
le Caravan (20 6)
Copy of Luxury 4x4 +Twin Ax
-89%
1%
6.96 15
4.972 6.16
ractor trailer
g caravan on t
2 - 15m tourin
Max 90° Horiz
4.877 Max 10° Vert
0.897 2.88 Max 90° Horiz
3.933 1.4 2.78 4.48 Max 10° Vert
1.36 3.8
8.5 1.33 1.33 2.87
Overall Width 2.550m 2 - 15m touring caravan on tractor trailer
Overall Body Height 2.545m Overall Length 18.510m
Min Body Ground Clearance 0.272m Overall Width 2.550m
Max Track Width 2.550m Overall Body Height 3.870m
Lock-to-lock time 4.00s Min Body Ground Clearance 0.515m
Hous ley
Curb to Curb Turning Radius 5.800m Max Track Width 2.470m
e
e
Stav

SWEPT PATH ANALYSIS
NTS 1000003180-2-611-03 -
SITE B - TURNHAM STREET
This map is reproduced from Ordnance Survey material with the permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office © Crown copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. (100032379) (2016) | Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright and database right (2016)
El Su
b Sta
Health Centre
17 to
44
Welf
are C
entre
| PLOT DATE: 05/08/2016 18:20:55 |

Parking stalls to be removed
OAD
25.0
6
16
1
10.9
1 to
MR
hicle
fuse Ve
Kentwell Close DB32 Re
NHA
ided
stalls1 to 44
TUR
prov
Spalding
CAD REFERENCE: G:\Project Centre Brighton\Brighton\CAD\00-PROJECT\1000003180\1000003180-2-611.dwg | SCarscadden | ---- |

DB32 Refu
House
se
Vehicle
cle
g
fuse Vehi
arkin
DB32 Re
-77%
ted p
igna
, des
rking
44
a
ed p
1 to
Spalding
ntroll
House
Unco
7.9
0%
e cl
DB32 Refuse Vehi
1.45 4
DB32 Refuse Vehicle

Overall Body Height 3.183m
Min Body Ground Clearance 0.388m
40

SWEPT PATH ANALYSIS
NTS 1000003180-2-611-11 -
SITE B - TURNHAM STREET
APPENDIX C – TRACKING DIAGRAMS: NEW CROSS SOCIAL CLUB
(SITE C)
© Project Centre 2013  Highway and Access Feasibility Report C

28
to
21
23 1 10
3 to 9 12 to 18 2 11
Saltwood House
12
g
t parkin
2.31
13 d stree
Unc ontrolle
7.72
FW
| PLOT DATE: 07/09/2016 17:05:02 |

2.28
-1%
CF
Copy of LuxuryR
ST EET
4x4 +Twin Axle Caravan (20
6)
SHAY
HORN
0%
06)
Copy of Luxury 4x4 +Twin Axle Caravan (20
FB
Double
ximate
2 Appro w Lines
CW
Copy of Luxury 4x4 +Twin Axle Caravan (20 6
) Yello
van(20 6)
inAxleCar
ury4x4+Tw
CopyofLux
301
rking
d street pa
OAD
FW Uncontrolle
CAD REFERENCE: G:\Project Centre Brighton\Brighton\CAD\00-PROJECT\1000003180\1000003180-2-611.dwg | VBenedikt | ---- |

CW
303
ILDERTON R
FW
CW
CF
6.96
44 4.972
CW 46 1 to
48 4 Men 25
50 2 dip C
CW
ourtMax 90° Horiz
FB
4.877 Max 10° Vert

0.897 2.88
CF
3.933 1.4 2.78

58
CF
WAT Overall Width 2.550m

66 ER LANE
Overall Body Height
Min Body Ground Clearance
2.545m
0.272m
A 07/09/2016 Updated vehicle tracking VB TW BM


SWEPT PATH ANALYSIS
NTS 1000003180-2-611-04 A
SITE C - NEW CROSS SOCIAL CLUB
7 to 10
1to6
19 20
28
to
21
23 1 10
3 to 9 12 to 18 2 11
| PLOT DATE: 07/09/2016 17:05:05 |

Saltwood House
12
rking
eet pa
2.31
lled str
13
tro
Uncon
7.72
FW
2.28
CF tractor trailer
TR EE2 - 15mTtouring caravan on
S HAY S
HORN
FB
0%
caravan on tractor trailer

van2 on- 15mtracttourr tirnagiler
2 - 15m touring cara
-10%
Double
2 - 15m touring caravan

ximate
2 Appro w Lines
CW
Ye llo
on tractor trailer

301
rking
d street pa
ROAD
FW Uncontrolle
CW
303
FW
ILDERTON
CW
15
6.16
CF
44
CW 46 1 to
48 4 Men 25
50 2 dip C Max 90° Horiz
CW
1.36
4.48
3.8 ourt
Max 10° Vert
FB
8.5 1.33 1.33 2.87

CF
58 2 - 15m touring caravan on tractor trailer

CF

WAT Min Body Ground Clearance 0.515m
66 ER L Max Track Width 2.470m Chev
ANE Lock-to-lock time 3.00s
iot C
ou


SWEPT PATH ANALYSIS
NTS 1000003180-2-611-05 A
SITE C - NEW CROSS SOCIAL CLUB
APPENDIX D – TRACKING DIAGRAMS: LAND BEHIND 46-116 BAIZDON ROAD
(SITE D)
© Project Centre 2013  Highway and Access Feasibility Report D

15
15
to
to
29
29
30 30
31
31
13
13
t
t
o4
o4
5
| PLOT DATE: 05/08/2016 14:39:42 |

5
5
47
47
to
to
1t
1t
77 77
61
o4
o4
79
79
1
to to
63 63
to
to
93
93
13 13
44
44
95
95
t
t
o1
o1
17 17
0
9
9
21 21
46 to 62
46 to 62
NE NE

SB SB
IT IT
CL CL
OS OS
BAIZDON ROAD
BAIZDON ROAD
E E
111 to 133
111 to 133
64
64
74
74
to
to
12 12
7 7

1t 1t
o4 o4
135 to 157
135 to 157
76
76
to
86
to
86
BAIZDON ROAD
BAIZDON ROAD
2%
11 11
1%
88 to 104
88 to 104
13 13
Parking sta
Parking sta
16 16
lls to
lls to
Parking
Parking
be remove
be remove
159 to 173
159 to 173
106 to 116
106 to 116
21 PE 21 PE
2 - 15m
RK RK
touring
d
d
carava
SC SC
n on tr
actor t
LO LO
railer
SE E S
Copy of Luxury 4x4
+Twin Axle Carava
n (20 6)
Copy of Luxury 4x4 +Twin

Axle Caravan (20 6)
175 to 189
175 to 189
9 9
6.96 15
4.972 6.16
Do
Do
7%
1.98
1.98
5 5 2 - 15m touring caravan on tractor trailer
ub
ub
5.27
5.27
-21%
le
le
Ye
Ye
llo
llo
2.42
2.42
w
w
Lin
Lin
1t 1t
es
es
o4 o4
2 - 15m touring caravan on

Max 90° Horiz
4.877 Max 10° Vert
207 to 221 207 to 221
191 to 205 0.897 2.88 191 to 205
tractor trailer
Max 90° Horiz
3.933 1.4 2.78 4.48 Max 10° Vert
1.36 3.8
8.5 1.33 1.33 2.87
COLLIN
COLLIN
Cedar Co
Cedar Co
Parking
Parking
tta
tta
El Sub Sta
El Sub Sta
S STRE
S STRE
Min Body Ground Clearance 0.515m
ge
ge
Curb to Curb Turning Radius 5.800m Max Track Width 2.470m
ET
ET
Court
Court
Village
Village

SWEPT PATH ANALYSIS
NTS 1000003180-2-611-06 -
SITE D - 46 - 116 BAIZDON ROAD
APPENDIX E – TRACKING DIAGRAMS: LAND AT POOL COURT
(SITE E – SCENARIOS 1 & 2)
© Project Centre 2013  Highway and Access Feasibility Report E

Rivers Centre Rivers Centre
2 - 15m
touring
van (20 6)
carava
4 +Twin Axle Cara
n on tr
actor t
Copy of Luxury 4x
railer
2 - 15m to
uring cara
van on tra
ctor trailer
| PLOT DATE: 07/09/2016 17:05:15 |

Copy of Luxury 4
x4 +Twin Axle C
a
ravan (20 6) Rivers Rivers
2 - 15m t
4%
Centre
ouring ca
Centre
avan on r
tractor tra
iler
-3%

62 to 73 7
4
1.8 5.14 1.6 62 to 73 7
4
1.8 5.14 1.6
McMillan House McMillan House
erb
Un
b
Un
Un
ker
Un
nk
con
con
co
co
on
o
ntr
troll
ntr
troll
king
king
oll
oll
ed
ed
ed
Par
ed
Par
p
pa
p
ark
pa
ark
rki
rki
in
ng
ing
g
ng
37 to 61
37 to 61
3.8
7 3.8
7
7.2
7 7.2
RT
7
RT
3.9
8 3.9
8
U U
6.96
O 15
O
on king
on king
b
4.972 6.16
C
b
ker
ker
Par
Par
O O
PO PO
Beatrice House Beatrice House
T
T
25 to 36
Max 90° Horiz
UR
erb
25 to 36
UR
b
4.877 Max 10° Vert
ker
nk
CO
0.897 2.88
CO
3.933 1.4 2.78 Max 90° Horiz
on
o
4.48 Max 10° Vert

16
16
OL
ing
D
1.36 3.8
OL
king
D
Copy of Luxury 4x4 +Twin Axle Caravan (2006) 8.5 1.33 1.33 2.87
OA
k
PO
OA
Par
PO
Par
LR
LR
-2%

MIL
CR
MIL
Lock-to-lock time 4.00s Min Body Ground Clearance 0.515m -24%
RD
RD
6)

FO
FO
1 to 6 Curb to Curb Turning Radius 1 to 6 6.550m
31
or trailer
31
ct
van on tra
uring cara
2 - 15m to

SWEPT PATH ANALYSIS
NTS 1000003180-2-611-07 A
SITE E - POOL COURT
| PLOT DATE: 07/09/2016 17:05:20 |

Rivers Rivers
Centre Centre

62 to 73 7
4
1.8 5.14 1.6 62 to 73 7
4
1.8 5.14 1.6
2%
erb
Un
b
Un
Un
ker
Un
nk
con
con
co
co
on
o
ntr
troll
ntr
troll
king
ing
oll
oll
ed
ailer
ed
ed
tractor tr
ark
Par
ed
p
oravatranileonr
pa
06)
p
ark
P
pa
oonurintrgactca
ark
rki
rki
in
uring car- 15avanm t

ng
ing
g
2 - 15m to 2
ng
37 to 61
37 to 61
0%
0%
3.8
7 3.8
7
7.2
7 7.2
RT
7
RT
3.9
8 3.9
8
U U
6.96
O 15
O
on king
on king
b
4.972 6.16
C
b
ker
ker
Par
Par
O O
PO PO
in Axle Caravan (20 6)

Copy of Luxury 4x4 +Tw
T
T
25 to 36
Max 90° Horiz
UR
erb
25 to 36
UR
b
4.877 Max 10° Vert
ker
nk
CO
0.897 2.88
CO
3.933 1.4 2.78 Max 90° Horiz
on
o
4.48 Max 10° Vert

16
-2%
16
OL
ing
D
1.36 3.8
OL
king
D
OA
k
PO
OA
Par
PO
Par
LR
LR
MIL
CR
MIL
RD
RD
FO
FO
1 to 6 Curb to Curb Turning Radius 1 to 6 6.550m
31
31

SWEPT PATH ANALYSIS
NTS 1000003180-2-611-08 A
SITE E - POOL COURT
APPENDIX F – TRACKING DIAGRAMS: LAND AT POOL COURT
(SITE E – SCENARIO 3)
© Project Centre 2013  Highway and Access Feasibility Report F

| PLOT DATE: 07/09/2016 17:05:25 |

Rivers Rivers
Centre Centre

62 to 73 7
4
1.8 5.14 1.6 62 to 73 7
4
1.8 5.14 1.6
erb
Un
b
Un
Un
ker
6%
Un
nk
con
con
co
co
on
o
ntr
troll
ntr
troll
king
king
oll
oll
ed
ed
ed
Par
ed
-11%
Par
p
pa
r
p
or traile
ark
pa
ark
on tract
rki
rki
in
caravan
ng
ing
g
ng
touring
2 - 15m
06)
37 to 61
37 to 61
3.8
7 3.8
7
7.2
7 7.2
RT
7
RT
3.9
8 3.9
8
U U
6.96
O 15
O
on king
on king
b
4.972 6.16
C
b
ker
ker
Par
Par
O O
PO PO
T
T
25 to 36
Max 90° Horiz
UR
erb
25 to 36
UR
b
4.877 Max 10° Vert
ker
nk
CO
0.897 2.88
CO
3.933 1.4 2.78 Max 90° Horiz
on
o
4.48 Max 10° Vert

16
16
OL
ing
D
1.36 3.8
OL
king
D
OA
k
PO
OA
Par
PO
Par
LR
LR
Min Body Ground Clearance 0.272m 0%
MIL
CR
0%
MIL
RD
RD
n (20 6)
FO
+Twin Axle Carava
FO
railer
1 to 6
Copy of Luxury 4x4
on tractor t
1 to 6
31
ing caravan
31
2 - 15m tour

SWEPT PATH ANALYSIS
NTS 1000003180-2-611-09 A
SITE E - POOL COURT
APPENDIX G – LAND AT ST MILDRED’S ROAD
(SITE F)
© Project Centre 2013  Highway and Access Feasibility Report G

69 69
71 71
CR CR
1% Copy of Luxury 4x4 +Twin Axle Caravan (20 6) 10 10
iler
85 85 2 - 15m touring caravan on tractor tra
Ward Bdy Ward Bdy
3%
87 14 87 14
89 89
S ROAD S ROAD
2 - 15m touring caravan on tractor tra
7% iler
ST MILDRED ST MILDRED
18 18
-10% Copy of Luxury 4x4 +Twin Axle Caravan (20 6)
20 1 to 10 20 1 to 10
24 24
St Mildred's Kendall St Mildred's Kendall
32 32
7.14 2.60 38 7.14 2.60 38
2.62 2.62
House House
40 Church 40 Church
50 50
| PLOT DATE: 05/08/2016 14:46:35 |

62 62
74 74
86 Vicarage 86 Vicarage
1a
1a
HELDER
HELDER
2
2
98 98
1
2
2
1
1
Burnt Ash Farm Burnt Ash Farm
Unco
Unco
(Depot) (Depot)
GROVE
GROVE
10a 10
10a 10
ntr
ntr
olled
olled
parki
parki
ng
ng
(bo
(bo
12
12
7
7
El Sub Sta El Sub Sta
th sid
th sid
6 )
Copy of Luxury 4x4 +Twin Axle Caravan (20
es)
es)
14
14
13
13
2 - 15m t
ouring car
avan on
tractor tra
van(20 6) iler
inAxleCar
ury4x4+Tw
CopyofLux 32 32
44 44
56 56
RA
RA
2 - 15m
touring
carava
n on tr
actor t
railer
YF
YF
OR
OR
22
22
D
D
23
23
26
26
AV
AV
EN
EN
51 39 27 51 39 27
UE
UE
33
33
38
38

Bo
Bo
ro
ro
Co
Co
ns
ns
43
43
t an
t an
dW
dW
CR
CR
ard
ard
Bd
Bd
y
y
50
50
62 54 44 62 54 44
72 72
51
51
WAITE DAVIES ROAD WAITE DAVIES ROAD
61 51 61 51
73 73
60 60
70 70
RONVER ROAD
RONVER ROAD
Stables Stables
109
109
Warehouse 56 Warehouse 56
66 66
76 76
103
103
71 69 71 69
99
99
61 59 61 59
90 to 96
90 to 96
Unc
Unc
ont
ont
ro
ro
lle
lle
d
d
Uncontrolled
Uncontrolled
par
par
king
king
82 to 88
82 to 88
-29%
15%

Copy of Luxury 4x4 +Twin Axle Carav
91
91
parking
parking
Warehouse Warehouse
an (20 6)
74 to 80 66 to 72 64 74 to 80 66 to 72 64
RONVER ROAD RONVER ROAD
2.38
2.38
Copy of Luxury 4x4 +Twin Axle Caravan (20 6) Copy of Luxury 4x4 +Twin Axle Caravan (20 6)
0%
7.25
7.25
2 - 15m touring caravan on tract 1%
or trailer
2.72
2.72
(20 6)
Axle Car van Uncontrolled parking Uncontrolled parking
ry 4x4 +Twin 55 55a 57 57a 59 59a 61 61a 63 55 55a 57 57a 59 59a 61 61a 63
Copy of Luxu 65 65
77 77
17
17
El Sub Sta El Sub Sta
tractor trailer
ng caravan on
2 - 15m touri
Stables Stables
6 t 6 t
1 to h C 1 to h C
1 to
1 to
rg rg
29
29
inbu inbu
8
8
McM
McM
Ed Ed
illan
illan
9 to
9 to
Cou
Cou
21
21
Shelter Shelter
16
16
rt
rt
22
22
17
17
to
to
28
28
18
18
W
W
ash
ash
Pond Pond
ing
ing
P
P
lan
lan
t
t
41
41
17
17
6.96 15
1 to allan
1 to allan
Row
Row
4.972 6.16
8
8
El Sub El Sub
Sta Sta
34
34
Cou
Cou
9 to
9 to
rt
rt
16
16
12
12
17
17
to
to
28
28
53
53
Max 90° Horiz
6
6
46
46
1 to eridia
1 to eridia
4.877 Max 10° Vert
M
M
8
8
0.897 2.88
n
n
3.933 1.4 2.78 Max 90° Horiz
Cou
Cou
9 tort
9 tort
4.48 Max 10° Vert
1
1
16
16
65
65
1.36 3.8
83
83
58
58
Overall Body Height 1 to 12 2.545m Overall Length 1 to 12 18.510m
Bo
Bo
Min Body Ground Clearance
Braemar
0.272m
Braemar
Court
Overall Width Court
2.550m
ro
ro
Co
Co
ns
ns
t an
t an
68
68
dW
dW
CR
CR
ard
ard
95
95
Bd
Bd
y
y
7
Max Track Width 7
2.470m
5 1 to 12 Lock-to-lock time 5 3.00s 1 to 12
4
Barrow Barrow
11
11
Court
Curb to Curb Turning Radius 6.550m Court
70
70
10
10
89
89
5

SWEPT PATH ANALYSIS
NTS 1000003180-2-611-10 -
SITE F - ST MILDREDS ROAD
© Project Centre 2013  Highway and Access Feasibility Report H

Highway and Access Feasibility Report: Assessment For Potential Gypsy and Traveller Sites

Hochgeladen von

Dokumentinformationen

Originaltitel

Copyright

Verfügbare Formate

Dieses Dokument teilen

Dokument teilen oder einbetten

Freigabeoptionen

Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

Highway and Access Feasibility Report: Assessment For Potential Gypsy and Traveller Sites

Hochgeladen von

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

Highway and Access Feasibility Report

Assessment for Potential Gypsy and Traveller Sites

1000003180 01 Draft Tom Wood Ben Meekings Ben Meekings

1000003180 02 Draft 2 Tom Wood Ben Meekings Ben Meekings

© Project Centre 2016  Highway and Access Feasibility Report i

2. GUIDANCE DOCUMENTS AND VEHICLE INFORMATION 3

3. APPROACH TO SWEPT PATH ANALYSIS 7

4. SITE A – LAND OFF WESTBOURNE DRIVE 8

5. SITE B –LAND OFF TURNHAM ROAD 0

6. SITE C – NEW CROSS SOCIAL CLUB (KEY SITE) 0

7. SITE D – LAND BEHIND 46-116 BAIZDON ROAD 0

8. SITE E – LAND AT POOL COURT (KEY SITE) 0

9. SITE F – LAND AT ST MILDRED’S ROAD 0

APPENDIX A – TRACKING DIAGRAMS: LAND OFF WESTBOURNE DRIVE (SITE A) A

APPENDIX B - TRACKING DIAGRAMS: LAND OFF TURNHAM ROAD (SITE B) B

APPENDIX C – TRACKING DIAGRAMS: NEW CROSS SOCIAL CLUB (SITE C) C

APPENDIX D – TRACKING DIAGRAMS: LAND BEHIND 46-116 BAIZDON ROAD (SITE D) D

APPENDIX E – TRACKING DIAGRAMS: LAND AT POOL COURT (SITE E – SCENARIOS 1 & 2) E

APPENDIX F – TRACKING DIAGRAMS: LAND AT POOL COURT (SITE E – SCENARIO 3) F

APPENDIX G – LAND AT ST MILDRED’S ROAD (SITE F) G

© Project Centre 2016  Highway and Access Feasibility Report ii

1.3 In summary, the six sites shortlisted for investigation are:

Site A Land on Westbourne Drive (adjacent to St George’s Primary School) SE23

Site D Land at R/O 46-116 Baizdon Road SE3

Site E Land at Pool Court, SE6

Site F Land at St Mildred’s Road, Hither Green, SE12

 Criteria 3: Safe and reasonably convenient access to the road network

a) Safe vehicular access or capable of creating safe vehicular

b) Access for emergency services

c) Clearance height of 3.7m.

 Criteria 4: Capable of satisfactory provision for parking, turning, service and

a) Judgement (size and shape of site

b) Infrequent access needed for 15m long caravan

© Project Centre 2016  Highway and Access Feasibility Report 1

 Width of road that directly serves the site;

 Gradient of road that directly serves the site;

 Height clearance of road that directly serves the site;

 Existing car parking restrictions and parking situation;

 Existing street furniture;

© Project Centre 2016  Highway and Access Feasibility Report 2

 Road Vehicles (Construction and Use) Regulations 2010

 Planning Policy for Travellers Sites (2015)

Road Vehicles (Construction and Use) Regulations 2010

Planning Policy for Travellers Sites (August 2015)

2.4 This guidance document can be found at:

2.6 The 2008 guidance can be found at:

© Project Centre 2016  Highway and Access Feasibility Report 3

© Project Centre 2016  Highway and Access Feasibility Report 4

Refuse Collection Vehicles

© Project Centre 2016  Highway and Access Feasibility Report 5

Figure 1 – Towing Mirror Visibility Requirements

2.23 An online version can be accessed at:

© Project Centre 2016  Highway and Access Feasibility Report 6

© Project Centre 2016  Highway and Access Feasibility Report 7

Figure 5.1: Site Location and Highway Boundary

© Project Centre 2016  Highway and Access Feasibility Report 8

Assessment criteria Measure Observations

© Project Centre 2016  Highway and Access Feasibility Report 9

1. On exiting the site, vehicles turning 2. Restriction of parking north and

© Project Centre 2016  Highway and Access Feasibility Report 0

Figure 6.1: Site Location and Highway Boundary

Table 6.2: Major Findings made via Observation

© Project Centre 2016  Highway and Access Feasibility Report 0