Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
1. Identify how inventories are measured and presented and to identify what costs are to be
included or excluded from the cost of inventories.
Answers:
Measurement:
•Inventories shall be measured at the lower of cost and net realisable value.
(IAS 2, para. 9)
Specific Identification
Specific identification of cost means that specific costs are attributed to identified items of
inventory. This is the appropriate treatment for items that are segregated for a specific project,
regardless of whether they have been bought or produced. However, specific identification of
costs is inappropriate when there are large numbers of items of inventory that are ordinarily
interchangeable. In such circumstances, the method of selecting those items that remain in
inventories could be used to obtain predetermined effects on profit or loss..
The FIFO formula assumes that the items of inventory that were purchased or produced first are
sold first, and consequently the items remaining in inventory at the end of the period are those
most recently purchased or produced.
Weighted-average
the cost of each item is determined from the weighted average of the cost of similar items at the
beginning of a period and the cost of similar items purchased or produced during the period.
The average may be calculated on a periodic basis, or as each additional shipment is received,
depending upon the circumstances of the entity.
The cost of inventories, other than those dealt with in paragraph 23, shall be assigned by using
the first-in, first-out (FIFO) or weighted average cost formula. An entity shall use the same cost
formula for all inventories having a similar nature and use to the entity. For inventories with a
different nature or use, different cost formulas may be justified.
3. inventories
● When inventories are sold
● Write-down of inventories
(When inventories are sold, the carrying amount of those inventories shall
be recognised as an expense in the period in which the related revenue is
recognised. The amount of any write-down of inventories to net
realisable value and all losses of inventories shall be recognised as an
expense in the period the write-down or loss occurs. The amount of any
reversal of any write-down of inventories, arising from an increase in net
realisable value, shall be recognised as a reduction in the amount of
inventories recognised as an expense in the period in which the reversal
occurs.)
Elements of cost The cost of an item of property, plant and equipment comprises:
● its purchase price
● any costs directly attributable
● the initial estimate of the costs of dismantling
Intangible Assets
These are initially measured at Cost, which comprises:
● Purchase Price
● Less any Trade Discount or Rebate,
● Plus any directly related cost which includes
Sales tax and Import duties (if non-refundable), Legal charges, Pre-production
testing cost (Net expense) and any other cost which is essential in bringing the
asset into its operating or intended use by the management.
Investment Property
An owned investment property shall be measured initially at its cost. Transaction costs
shall be included in the initial measurement.
5. Cost model, the revaluation model, and fair value model for the subsequent
measurement of PPE, Investment property and Intangible assets
However, when a property interest held by a lessee under an operating lease is classified as an
investment property, the fair value model shall be applied.
The revalued amount is the fair value at the date of revaluation and is determined by reference
to an active market.
Thus, an intangible asset can only be carried at revalued amount if there is an active market for
the asset.
8. Borrowing Cost
Core principle: Borrowing costs directly attributable to the acquisition, construction and
production of a qualifying asset form part of the cost of that asset. Other borrowing costs are
recognized as expenses when incurred.
Recognition:
Borrowing costs are capitalised when it is probable that they will result in future economic
benefits to the entity and the cost can be measured reliably. These borrowing costs would have
been avoided if the expenditure of a qualifying asset was not made.
(a) test an intangible asset with an indefinite useful life or an intangible asset not yet available
for use for impairment annually by comparing its carrying amount with its recoverable amount.
This impairment test may be performed at any time during an annual period, provided it is
performed at the same time every year. Different intangible assets may be tested for impairment
at different times. However, if such an intangible asset was initially recognised during the
current annual period, that intangible asset
shall be tested for impairment before the end of the current annual period.
(b) test goodwill acquired in a business combination for impairment annually in accordance with
paragraphs 80–99.
In assessing whether there is any indication that an asset may be impaired, an entity shall also
consider, as a minimum, the following indications:
(a) there are observable indications that the asset’s value has declined during the period
significantly more than would be expected as a result of the passage of time or normal use.
(b) significant changes with an adverse effect on the entity have taken place during the period,
or will take place in the near future, in the technological, market, economic or legal environment
in which the entity operates or in the market to which an asset is dedicated.
(c) market interest rates or other market rates of return on investments have increased during
the period, and those increases are likely to affect the discount rate used in calculating an
asset’s value in use and decrease the asset’s recoverable amount materially.
(d) the carrying amount of the net assets of the entity is more than its market capitalisation.
(f) significant changes with an adverse effect on the entity have taken place during the period, or
are expected to take place in the near future, in the extent to which, or manner in which, an
asset is used or is expected to be used. These changes include the asset
becoming idle, plans to discontinue or restructure the operation to which an asset belongs,
plans to dispose of an asset before the previously expected date, and reassessing the useful life
of an asset as finite rather than indefinite.
(g) evidence is available from internal reporting that indicates that the economic performance of
an asset is, or will be, worse than expected.
(h) for an investment in a subsidiary, joint venture or associate, the investor recognises a
dividend from the investment and evidence is available that:
(i) the carrying amount of the investment in the separate financial statements exceeds the
carrying amounts in the consolidated financial statements of the investee’s net assets, including
associated goodwill; or
(ii) the dividend exceeds the total comprehensive income of the subsidiary, joint venture or
associate in the period the dividend is declared.
(a) land related to agricultural activity (see IAS 16 and IAS 40).
(b) bearer plants related to agricultural activity (see IAS 16). However, this Standard applies to
the produce on those bearer plants.
(c) government grants related to bearer plants (see IAS 20).
(d) intangible assets related to agricultural activity (see IAS 38).
(e) right-of-use assets arising from a lease of land related to agricultural activity (see IFRS 16
Leases).
SUBSEQUENT MEASUREMENT
Biological asset - measure at fair value less cost to sell
Agricultural produce- . Such measurement is the cost at that date when applying IAS
2 Inventories or another applicable Standard
15. Initial measurement rule and transactions/events that affect the investment balance
under the equity method
Initial Measurement: a t COST
Note: C arrying amount is increased or decreased to recognise the investor’s
share of the profit or loss of the investee after the date of acquisition.
transactions/events that affect the investment balance under the equity method:
● Distributions received from an investee reduce the carrying amount of the investment
● Adjustments to the carrying amount arising from changes (e.g. revaluation of PPE and
foreign exchange translation differences) in the investee’s other comprehensive income
16. An entity shall discontinue the use of the equity method from the date when its
investment ceases to be an associate or a joint venture as follows:
(a) If the investment becomes a subsidiary, the entity shall account for its investment in
accordance with IFRS 3 Business Combinations and IFRS 10.
(b) If the retained interest in the former associate or joint venture is a financial asset, the entity
shall measure the retained interest at fair value. The fair value of the retained interest shall be
regarded as its fair value on initial recognition as a financial asset in accordance with IFRS 9.
The entity shall recognise in profit or loss any difference between:
(i) the fair value of any retained interest and any proceeds from disposing of a part interest in
the associate or joint venture; and
(ii) the carrying amount of the investment at the date the equity method was discontinued.
D. When an investment in an associate or a joint venture is held by, or is held indirectly through,
an entity that is a venture capital organisation, or a mutual fund, unit trust and similar entities
including investment-linked insurance funds, the entity may elect to measure that investment at
fair value through profit or loss in accordance with IFRS 9.
17. (IAS 28) Effects on the financial statements when there are differences between the
reporting entity and the associate with regard to the reporting period and accounting
policies.
(33) The most recent available financial statements of the associate or joint venture are used by
the entity in applying the equity method. When the end of the reporting period of the entity is
different from that of the associate or joint venture, the associate or joint venture prepares, for
the use of the entity, financial statements as of the same date as the financial statements of the
entity unless it is impracticable to do so.
(34) When, in accordance with paragraph 33, the financial statements of an associate or a joint
venture used in applying the equity method are prepared as of a date different from that used by
the entity, adjustments shall be made for the effects of significant transactions or events that
occur between that date and the date of the entity’s financial statements. In any case, the
difference between the end of the reporting period of the associate or joint venture and that of
the entity shall be no more than
three months. The length of the reporting periods and any difference between the ends of the
reporting periods shall be the same from period to period.
(35) The entity’s financial statements shall be prepared using uniform accounting policies for like
transactions and events in similar
Circumstances.
As with the classification of any investment, the substance of the arrangements in each case will
need to be considered. If it can be clearly demonstrated that an investor holding 20 per cent or
more of the voting power of the investee does not have significant influence, the investment will
not be accounted for as an associate.
Even when another party has control, it is still possible that a reporting entity may have
significant influence (e.g. when it has a right to input into the board decision-making process).
There is also no upper limit to the size of the holding that may be associated with significant
influence. For example, an entity may have significant influence and more than 50 per cent of
the shares in another entity, but a third party may have control of that other entity (e.g. as a
result of potential voting rights).
19. ) R elated Parties and identify transactions between related parties that require
disclosures.
● RELATED PARTY
➢ A normal feature of commerce and business. E.g. (entities frequently carry on parts of their
activities through subsidiaries, joint ventures and associates)
● It could have an effect on the P/L and financial position of an entity.
➢ Related Parties may enter into transactions that unrelated parties will not.
● Transactions between related parties may not be the same amount as unrelated
parties.
● P/L and FS of an entity may be affected by a related party relationship even if related
party transactions do not occur.
➢ The mere existence of the relationship may be sufficient to affect the transactions of the entity
with other parties.
DEFINITIONS
1) RELATED PARTY- is a person or entity that is related to the entity that is preparing its
financial statements (referred to as the 'reporting entity') [IAS 24.9].
(a) A person or a close member of that person's family is related to a reporting entity if that
person:
(i) has control or joint control over the reporting entity;
(ii) has significant influence over the reporting entity; or
(iii) is a member of the key management personnel of the reporting entity or of a parent
of the reporting entity.
(b) An entity is related to a reporting entity if any of the following conditions applies:
(i) The entity and the reporting entity are members of the same group (which means that
each parent, subsidiary and fellow subsidiary is related to the others).
(ii) One entity is an associate or joint venture of the other entity (or an associate or joint
venture of a member of a group of which the other entity is a member).
(iii) Both entities are joint ventures of the same third party.
(iv) One entity is a joint venture of a third entity and the other entity is an associate of the
third entity.
(v) The entity is a post-employment defined benefit plan for the benefit of employees of
either the reporting entity or an entity related to the reporting entity. If the reporting entity
is itself such a plan, the sponsoring employers are also related to the reporting entity.
(vi) The entity is controlled or jointly controlled by a person identified in (a).
(vii) A person identified in (a)(i) has significant influence over the entity or is a member of
the key management personnel of the entity (or of a parent of the entity).
(viii) The entity, or any member of a group of which it is a part, provides key
management personnel services to the reporting entity or to the parent of the reporting
entity*.
Amounts incurred by the entity for the provision of key mgmt. personnel services that are
provided by a separate mgmt. entity shall be disclosed
· It shall be made separately for the ff.
- The parent
- Entities with joint control of, or significant influence over the entity
- Subsidiaries
- Associates
- Joint ventures in w/c the entity is a joint venture;
- Key mgmt. personnel of the entity or its parent; and
- Other related parties
20) General disclosure requirements for related parties and related party transactions.
TAKE NOTE:
Related party transactions and outstanding balances with other entities in a group are disclosed
in an entity’s financial statements. Intragroup related party transactions and outstanding
balances are eliminated, except for those between an investment entity and its subsidiaries
measured at fair value through profit or loss, in the preparation of consolidated financial
statements of the group.
❖ An entity shall disclose key management personnel compensation in total and for each of the
following categories:
(a) short-term employee benefits;
(b) post-employment benefits;
(c) other long-term benefits;
(d) termination benefits; and
(e) share-based payment.
❖ If an entity obtains key management personnel services from another entity (the ‘management
entity’), the entity is not required to apply the requirements in paragraph 17 to the compensation
paid or payable by the management entity to the management entity’s employees or directors.
❖ If an entity has had related party transactions during the periods covered by the financial
statements, it shall disclose the nature of the related party relationship as well as information
about those transactions and outstanding balances, including commitments, necessary for
users to understand the potential effect of the relationship on the financialstatements. These
disclosure requirements are in addition to those in paragraph 17. At a minimum, disclosures
shall include:
(a) the amount of the transactions;
(b) the amount of outstanding balances, including commitments,and:
(i) their terms and conditions, including whether they are secured, and the nature of
the consideration to be provided in settlement; and
(ii) details of any guarantees given or received;
(c) provisions for doubtful debts related to the amount of outstanding balances; and
(d) the expense recognised during the period in respect of bad or doubtful debts due
from related parties.
❖ Amounts incurred by the entity for the provision of key management personnel services that are
provided by a separate management entity shall be disclosed.
The disclosures required by paragraph 18 shall be made separately for each of the following
categories:
(a) the parent;
(b) entities with joint control of, or significant influence over, the entity;
(c) subsidiaries;
(d) associates;
(e) joint ventures in which the entity is a joint venturer;
(f) key management personnel of the entity or its parent; and
(g) other related parties.
❖ Government-related entities
A reporting entity is exempt from the disclosure requirements of paragraph 18 in relation
to related party transactions and outstanding balances, including commitments, with:
(a) a government that has control or joint control of, or significant influence over,
the reporting entity; and
(b) another entity that is a related party because the same government has
control or joint control of, or significant influence over, both the reporting entity
and the other entity.
If a reporting entity applies the exemption in paragraph 25, it shall disclose the following
about the transactions and related outstanding balances referred to in paragraph 25:
(a) the name of the government and the nature of its relationship with the
reporting entity (ie control, joint control or significant influence);
(b) the following information in sufficient detail to enable users of the entity’s
financial statements to understand the effect of related party transactions on its financial
statements:
(i) the nature and amount of each individually significant transaction; and
(ii) for other transactions that are collectively, but not individually, significant, a
qualitative or quantitative indication of their extent. Types of transactions include
those listed in paragraph 21.
21. Short-term Employee Benefits
—those expected to be settled wholly before twelve months after the end of the annual reporting
period in which the employees render the related services
Defined benefit plans may be unfunded, or they may be wholly or partly funded by contributions
by an entity, and sometimes its employees, into an entity, or fund, that is legally separate from
the reporting entity and from which the employee benefits are paid. The payment of funded
benefits when they fall due depends not only on the financial position and the investment
performance of the fund but also on an entity’s ability, and willingness, to make good any
shortfall in the fund’s assets. Therefore, the entity is, in substance, underwriting the actuarial
and investment risks associated with the plan. Consequently, the expense recognised for a
defined benefit plan is not necessarily the amount of the contribution due for the period.
Accounting by an entity for defined benefit plans involves the following steps:
(a) determining the deficit or surplus. This involves:
(i) using an actuarial technique, the projected unit credit method to make a reliable estimate
of the ultimate cost to the entity of the benefit that employees have earned in return for their
service in the current and prior periods. This requires an entity to determine how much benefit
is attributable to the current and prior periods and to make estimates (actuarial assumptions)
about demographic variables (such as employee turnover and mortality) and financial variables
(such as future increases in salaries and medical costs)
that will affect the cost of the benefit.
(ii) discounting that benefit in order to determine the present valueof the defined benefit
obligation and the current service cost.
(iii) deducting the fair value of any plan assets from the present value of the defined
benefit obligation (b) determining the amount of the net defined benefit liability (asset) as the
amount of the deficit or surplus determined in, adjusted for any effect of limiting a net defined
benefit asset to the asset ceiling
(c) determining amounts to be recognised in profit or loss:
(i) current service cost
(ii) any past service cost and gain or loss on settlement
(iii) net interest on the net defined benefit liability (asset)
(d) determining the remeasurements of the net defined benefit liability
(asset), to be recognised in other comprehensive income, comprising:
(i) actuarial gains and losses
(ii) return on plan assets, excluding amounts included in net interest on the net defined
benefit liability (asset) and
(iii) any change in the effect of the asset ceiling excluding amounts included in net interest
on the net defined benefit liability (asset). Where an entity has more than one defined
benefit plan, the entity applies these procedures for each material plan separately.
An entity shall determine the net defined benefit liability (asset) with sufficient regularity that the
amounts recognised in the financial statements do not differ materially from the amounts that
would be determined at the end of the reporting period.
An entity shall recognise the net defined benefit liability (asset) in the statement of financial
position.
When an entity has a surplus in a defined benefit plan, it shall measure the net defined benefit
asset at the lower of:
(a) the surplus in the defined benefit plan; and
(b) the asset ceiling, determined using the discount rate specified in paragraph 83.
A net defined benefit asset may arise where a defined benefit plan has been
overfunded or where actuarial gains have arisen. An entity recognises a net
defined benefit asset in such cases because:
(a) the entity controls a resource, which is the ability to use the surplus to
generate future benefits;
(b) that control is a result of past events (contributions paid by the entity
and service rendered by the employee); and
(c) future economic benefits are available to the entity in the form of a
reduction in future contributions or a cash refund, either directly to the
entity or indirectly to another plan in deficit. The asset ceiling is the
present value of those future benefits.
The projected unit credit method requires an entity to attribute benefit to the
current period (in order to determine current service cost) and the current and
prior periods (in order to determine the present value of defined benefit
obligations). An entity attributes benefit to periods in which the obligation to
provide post-employment benefits arises. That obligation arises as employees
render services in return for post-employment benefits that an entity expects to
pay in future reporting periods. Actuarial techniques allow an entity to measure
that obligation with sufficient reliability to justify recognition of a liability
Employee service gives rise to an obligation under a defined benefit plan even if
the benefits are conditional on future employment (in other words they are not
vested). Employee service before the vesting date gives rise to a constructive
obligation because, at the end of each successive reporting period, the amount of
future service that an employee will have to render before becoming entitled to
the benefit is reduced. In measuring its defined benefit obligation, an entity
considers the probability that some employees may not satisfy any vesting
requirements. Similarly, although some post-employment benefits, for example,
post-employment medical benefits, become payable only if a specified event
occurs when an employee is no longer employed, an obligation is created when
the employee renders service that will provide entitlement to the benefit if the
specified event occurs.
Past service cost is the change in the present value of the defined benefit obligation resulting
from a plan amendment or curtailment.
An entity shall recognise past service cost as an expense at the earlier of the following dates:
(a) when the plan amendment or curtailment occurs; and
(b) when the entity recognises related restructuring costs or termination benefits
A plan amendment occurs when an entity introduces, or withdraws, a defined
benefit plan or changes the benefits payable under an existing defined benefit plan.
GAINS AND LOSSES ON SETTLEMENT
A settlement occurs when an entity enters into a transaction that eliminates all
further legal or constructive obligation for part or all of the benefits provided
under a defined benefit plan (other than a payment of benefits to, or on behalf
of, employees in accordance with the terms of the plan and included in the
actuarial assumptions). For example, a one-off transfer of significant employer
obligations under the plan to an insurance company through the purchase of an
insurance policy is a settlement; a lump sum cash payment, under the terms of
the plan, to plan participants in exchange for their rights to receive specified
post-employment benefits is not.
REIMBURSEMENT
When, and only when, it is virtually certain that another party will
reimburse some or all of the expenditure required to settle a defined
benefit obligation, an entity shall:
(a) recognise its right to reimbursement as a separate asset. The
entity shall measure the asset at fair value.
(b) disaggregate and recognise changes in the fair value of its right to
reimbursement in the same way as for changes in the fair value of
plan assets (see paragraphs 124 and 125). The components of
defined benefit cost recognised in accordance with paragraph 120
may be recognised net of amounts relating to changes in the
carrying amount of the right to reimbursement.
*IAS 19 does not specify how an entity should present service cost and net interest on the net
defined benefit liability (asset). An entity presents those components in accordance with IAS 1.
24. Defined benefit plan, its content, valuation policy, and disclosures
IAS 19: EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
• the entity’s obligation is to provide the agreed benefits to current and former employees; and
• actuarial risk (that benefits will cost more than expected) and investment risk fall, in substance,
on the entity.
(VALUATION POLICIES)
When an entity has a surplus in a Defined Benefit Plan, it measures the net defined benefit
asset at the lower of:
(DISCLOSURES)
(a) information about the characteristics of its defined benefit plans, including:
• the nature of the benefits provided by the plan.
• a description of the regulatory framework in which the plan operates.
• a description of any other entity’s responsibilities for the governance of the plan.
(b) a description of the risks to which the plan exposes the entity, focused on any unusual,
entity-specific or plan-specific risks, and of any significant concentrations of risk.
Defined benefit plans that share risks between entities under common control
(P. 149) If an entity participates in a defined benefit plan that shares risks between entities
under common control, it shall disclose:
(a) the contractual agreement or stated policy for charging the net defined benefit cost or the
fact that there is no such policy.
(b) the policy for determining the contribution to be paid by the entity.
(c) if the entity accounts for an allocation of the net defined benefit cost as noted, all the
information about the plan as a whole should be disclosed.
For equity-settled share-based payment transactions, the entity shall measure the
goods or services received, and the corresponding increase in equity, directly, at the fair value
of the goods or services received, unless that fair value cannot be estimated reliably. If the
entity cannot estimate reliably the fair value of the goods or services received, the entity shall
measure their value, and the corresponding increase in equity, indirectly, by reference to the fair
value of the equity instruments granted.
For cash-settled share-based payment transactions, the entity shall measure the
goods or services acquired and the liability incurred at the fair value of the liability, (subject to
the requirements of paragraphs 31–33D of IFRS 2). Until the liability is settled, the entity shall
remeasure the fair value of the liability at the end of each reporting period and at the date of
settlement, with any changes in fair value recognised in profit or loss for the period.
For share-based payment transactions with cash alternatives in which the terms of
the arrangement provide either the entity or the counterparty with the choice of whether the
entity settles the transaction in cash (or other assets) or by issuing equity instruments, the entity
shall account for that transaction, or the components of that transaction, as a cash-settled
share-based payment transaction if, and to the extent that, the entity has incurred a liability
to settle in cash or other assets, or as an e quity-settled share-based payment transaction if,
and to the extent that, no such liability has been incurred.
The entity shall recognise an amount for the goods or services received during the
vesting period. That amount shall be based on the best available estimate of the number of
awards that are expected to vest. The entity shall revise that estimate, if necessary, if
subsequent information indicates that the number of awards that are expected to vest differs
from previous estimates. On the vesting date, the entity shall revise the estimate to equal the
number of awards that ultimately vested.
26. Rules and Policies in the Recognition, Measurement, and Presentation of Provisions,
Contingent Liabilities, and Contingent Assets
Provision
- "a liability of uncertain timing or amount." (IAS 37.10)
Recognition Criteria
-A provision is recognized when ALL of the following conditions are met:
a.) The entity has a PRESENT OBLIGATION (legal or constructive) resulting from a past event;
b.) It is PROBABLE that an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits will be required
to settle the obligation; and
c.) The amount of the obligation can be RELIABLY ESTIMATED.
PRESENTATION
Provisions are presented in the STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION SEPARATELY from
other types of liabilities.
Contingent Liabilities are DISCLOSED ONLY, except when the possibility of an outflow of
resources embodying economic benefits is remote.
Contingent Assets are DISCLOSED ONLY, if the inflow of economic benefits is PROBABLE.
MEASUREMENT
· Provisions are measured at the best estimate of the expenditure required to settle the present
obligation at
reporting date.
· Where the provision being measured involves a large population of items (i.e. goods’
warranties), the obligation is
estimated by weighting all possible outcomes by their associated probabilities.
· In determining the best estimate, the related risks and uncertainties are taken into account
· Where the effect of the time value of money is material, the amount of the provision is the
present value of the
expenditures expected to be required to settle the obligation. The discount rate used is a pre-tax
discount rate
that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the
liability
- The discount rate does not reflect risks for which future cash flow estimates have been
adjusted
· Future events that may affect the amount required to settle the obligation are reflected in the
amount of the
provision where there is sufficient objective evidence that they will occur
· Gains from the expected disposal of assets are not taken into account in measuring the
provision
· Reimbursements from third parties for some or all expenditure required to settle a provision are
recognised only
when it is virtually certain that the reimbursement will be received. The reimbursement is treated
as a separate
asset, which cannot exceed the amount of the provision
· Provisions are reviewed at each reporting date and adjusted to reflect the current best
estimate
· If it is no longer probable that an outflow of economic benefits will be required to settle the
obligation, the
provision is released
· Provisions are not recognised for future operating losses.
27. Restatement of items in the Statement of Financial Position and Income Statement
-In the absence of such Standard or Interpretation that applies, management will use its
judgment in developing and applying an accounting policy that results in information that is
relevant and reliable.
-An entity shall select and apply its accounting policies consistently for similar transactions,
other events and conditions, unless a Standard or an Interpretation specifically requires or
permits categorisation of items for which different policies may be appropriate.
the period of the change, if the change affects that period only, or the period of the change and
future periods, if the change affects both.
Errors
The general principle in IAS 8 is that an entity must correct all material prior period errors
retrospectively in the first set of financial statements authorised for issue after their discovery by:
[IAS 8.42]
-restating the comparative amounts for the prior period(s) presented in which the error occurred;
or
-if the error occurred before the earliest prior period presented, restating the opening balances
of assets, liabilities and equity for the earliest prior period presented.
Recognition Criteria:
Government grants, including non-monetary grants at fair value, shall
not be recognised until there is reasonable assurance that:
(a) the entity will comply with the conditions attaching to them; and
(b) the grants will be received.
30. Classification criteria of a business into an SME (Small and Medium-sized Entities).
*Definitions:
➔ An entity has Public Accountability if:
a. Its debt or equity instruments are traded in a public market or it is in a process of
issuing such instruments for trading in the public market.
b. It holds assets in fiduciary capacity for a broad group of outsiders as the primary
business.
➔ SRC (Securities Regulation Code) Rule 68.1
- Pertains to “listed entities” or entities whose securities are traded in an exchange
market, and entities with assets of at least ₱50,000,000 and have 200 or more
holders each holding at least 100 shares of a class of equity securities.
● The standard does not contain a limit on the size of an entity that may use the IFRS for
SMEs provided that it does not have public accountability nor is there a restriction on its
use by a public utility, not-for-profit entity, or public sector entity
● A subsidiary whose parent or group uses full IFRSs may use the IFRS for SMEs if the
subsidiary itself does not have public accountability
The standard does not require any special approval by the owners of an SME for it to be
eligible to use the IFRS for SME
● Listed companies, no matter how small, may not use the IFRS for SMEs Q&A 2011/01
(published June 2011) states that a parent entity assesses its eligibility to use the IFRS
for SMEs in its separate financial statements on the basis of its own public accountability
without considering whether other group entities have, or the group as a whole has,
public accountability
32. Make a table showing the following information: Kind of assets/liabilities, definition,
recognition criteria, initial measurement and subsequent measurement.
Non- Current An asset that (a) the asset or An entity shall If subsequently
Assets Held does not meet disposal group measure a there is an
for Sale and the definition of is available for noncurrent increase in the
Discontinued a current asset. immediate sale asset or fair value less
Operations The in the present disposal group cost of disposal,
non-current condition classified as an entity may
asset may be subject only to held for sale at recognize a gain
an individual terms that are the lower of but not in
asset, like land usual and carrying amount excess of any
and building, or customary and fair value impairment loss
a disposal (b) the sale less cost of previously
group must be highly disposal recognized
probable
Agriculture The An entity shall A biological Biological asset
management recognize a asset shall be shall be
by an entity of biological measured on measured at its
the biological asset or initial cost less any
transformation agricultural recognition and accumulated
and harvest of produce when at the end of depreciation and
biological and only when: each reporting any
assets for sale (a) the entity period at its fair accumulated
or for controls the value less costs impairment
conversion into asset as a to sell losses. Once
agricultural result of past the fair value of
produce or into event; such a biological
additional (b) it is asset becomes
biological probable that reliably
assets future measurable, an
economic entity shall
benefits measure it at its
associated fair value less
with the asset costs to sell.
will flow to the
entity; and
(c) the fair
value or cost
of the asset
can be
measured
reliably
Contingent A possible Contingent
Assets asset that assets are not
arises from recognised,
past events but they are
and whose disclosed
existence will when it is more
be confirmed likely than not
only by the that an inflow
occurrence or of benefits will
non-occurrenc occur.
e of one or However,
more uncertain when the
future events inflow of
not wholly benefits is
within the virtually certain
control of the an asset is
entity recognised in
the statement
of financial
position,
because that
asset is no
longer
considered to
be contingent.
Borrowing Are interest An entity shall
Costs and other costs capitalize
that an entity borrowing
incurs in costs that are
connection with directly
the borrowing attributable to
of funds the acquisition,
construction or
production of a
qualifying
asset as part
of the cost of
that asset. An
entity shall
recognize
other
borrowing
costs as an
expense in a
period in which
it incurs them
LIABILITIE Contingent (a) a possible A contingent
S Liability obligation that liability is not
arises from recognised in
past events the statement
and whose of financial
existence will position.
be confirmed However,
only by the unless the
occurrence or possibility of
non-occurrenc an outflow of
e of one or economic
more uncertain resources is
future events remote, a
not wholly contingent
within the liability is
control of the disclosed in
entity; or the notes.
(b) a present
obligation that
arises from
past events but
is not
recognised
because:
(i) it is not
probable that
an outflow of
resources
embodying
economic
benefits will be
required to
settle the
obligation;
or
(ii) the amount
of the
obligation
cannot be
measured with
sufficient
reliability.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
CHAPTER SUMMARIES:
Objective
To provide financial information about the reporting entity
Useful to:
➔ Existing and potential investors
➔ Lenders and;
➔ Other creditors in making decisions about providing resources to the entity.
This enables them to assess the prospects for future net cash inflows to an entity.
Decisions involves:
➔ Buying
➔ Selling or holding equity or debt instruments
➔ Providing or settling loans
➔ Other forms of credit
General purpose financial reports are not designed to show the value of a
reporting entity; but they provide information to help existing and potential
investors, lenders and other creditors to estimate the value of the reporting entity.
b. Faithful Representation
-information must be faithfully represent the substance of what it purports to represent
-has three characteristics:
Complete – includes all information necessary for a user to understand the phenomena
(descriptions, explanations)
Neutral – without bias in the selection or presentation of financial information
Free from error – does not mean perfectly accurate in all respects
Process/ application:
1. Identify an economic phenomenon, information about which is capable of being useful to
users of the entity’s financial information
2. Identify the type of information about the phenomenon that would be most relevant
3. Determine whether that information is available and whether it can provide faithful
representation of the economic phenomenon.
Other Terms:
Prudence- the exercise of caution when making judgments under conditions of uncertainty;
does not allow for understatement or overstatement of the elements of FS (supports neutrality)
Measurement Uncertainty- does not prevent information from being useful
-in some cases, the most relevant information may have such a high level of uncertainty that the
most useful information is information that is slightly less relevant but is subject to lower
measurement uncertainty
Cost Constraint- the benefit of providing information needs to justify the cost of providing and
using the information
Cost- a pervasive constraint on the reporting entity’s ability to provide useful financial
information; justified by the benefits of reporting that information
This chapter describes the objective and scope of financial statements and provides a
description of the reporting entity.
Reporting period:
(a) assets and liabilities—including unrecognised assets and liabilities—and equity that existed
at the end of the reporting period, or during the reporting period; and
(b) income and expenses for the reporting period.
Determining the appropriate boundary of a reporting entity can be difficult if the reporting entity:
(a) is not a legal entity; and
(b) does not comprise only legal entities linked by a parent-subsidiary relationship.
Underlying assumption
The IFRS Framework states that the going concern assumption is an underlying assumption.
Thus, the financial statements presume that an entity will continue in operation indefinitely or, if
that presumption is not valid, disclosure and a different basis of reporting are required.
● An asset is a resource controlled by the entity as a result of past events and from which
future economic benefits are expected to flow to the entity.
● A liability is a present obligation of the entity arising from past events, the settlement of
which is expected to result in an outflow from the entity of resources embodying
economic benefits.
● Equity is the residual interest in the assets of the entity after deducting all its liabilities.
Income is increases in economic benefits during the accounting period in the form of
inflows or enhancements of assets or decreases of liabilities that result in increases in
equity, other than those relating to contributions from equity participants.
● Expenses are decreases in economic benefits during the accounting period in the form
of outflows or depletions of assets or incurrences of liabilities that result in decreases in
equity, other than those relating to distributions to equity participants.
The definition of income encompasses both revenue and gains.
● Revenue arises in the course of the ordinary activities of an entity and is referred to by a
variety of different names including sales, fees, interest, dividends, royalties and rent.
Gains represent other items that meet the definition of income and may, or may not,
arise in the course of the ordinary activities of an entity. Gains represent increases in
economic benefits and as such are no different in nature from revenue.
● The definition of expenses encompasses losses as well as those expenses that arise in
the course of the ordinary activities of the entity. Expenses that arise in the course of the
ordinary activities of the entity include, for example, cost of sales, wages and
depreciation. They usually take the form of an outflow or depletion of assets such as
cash and cash equivalents, inventory, property, plant and equipment. Losses represent
other items that meet the definition of expenses and may, or may not, arise in the course
of the ordinary activities of the entity. Losses represent decreases in economic benefits
and as such they are no different in nature from other expenses.
Recognition is the process of incorporating in the balance sheet or income statement an item
that meets the definition of an element and satisfies the following criteria for recognition:
It is probable that any future economic benefit associated with the item will flow to or from the
entity; and The item's cost or value can be measured with reliability.
● An asset is recognised in the balance sheet when it is probable that the future economic
benefits will flow to the entity and the asset has a cost or value that can be measured
reliably.
Measurement involves assigning monetary amounts at which the elements of the financial
statements are to be recognised and reported.
The IFRS Framework acknowledges that a variety of measurement bases are used today to
different degrees and in varying combinations in financial statements, including:
* Historical cost Current cost Net realisable (settlement) value Present value (discounted)
Historical cost is the measurement basis most commonly used today, but it is usually combined
with other measurement bases. The IFRS Framework does not include concepts or principles
for selecting which measurement basis should be used for particular elements of financial
statements or in particular circumstances. Individual standards and interpretations do provide
this guidance, however.
*The selection of the appropriate concept capital by an entity should be based on the needs of
the users of it FS.*