Sie sind auf Seite 1von 23

SEMINAR REPORT 2017

ABSTRACT
Composite slabs consist of profiled steel decking with an in-situ reinforced concrete
topping. The decking not only acts as permanent formwork to the concrete, but also provides
sufficient shear bond with the concrete so that, when the concrete has gained strength, the
two materials act together compositely. A composite slab with profiled steel decking is one
of the simpler, faster, lighter and economical constructions mainly in steel framed building
systems. Cold-formed galvanized thin-walled profiled steel decking sheets with embossments
on top flanges and webs are widely used in composite slab constructions. Commonly used
decking sheets have trapezoidal cross-section and these are available in various depths,
thickness and spans. After completing the skeleton of the structure decking sheets are fitted
to the beams using drive pins and shear studs either by welding or by bolting. Small propping
and support is needed for larger spans. Then the reinforcement as per the design is placed and
concrete is poured. Steel reinforcement required is very less compared to conventional slabs.
Even though the material cost is 0.172% higher than R.C.C slabs, the composite slab is cost
effective when the overall cost including time factor and labour is taken into account. They
are appropriate for industrial buildings, hospitals, cinemas, car parks, schools, housing etc.

Division of Civil Engineering, CUCEK


SEMINAR REPORT 2017

CONTENTS

LIST OF FIGURES іᴠ
1. INTRODUCTION 1

1.1Need and scope 1

2. DESIGN OF DECKING SLABS 1

2.1 General 1

2.2 Design of steel decking 2

2.3 Design of composite slabs 6

3. METHODOLOGY 7

3.1 General 7

3.2 Decking layout drawing 7

3.3 Components 9

3.3.1Temporary supports 9

3.3.2 Connectors 11

3.4 Casting process 11

3.4.1 Preparation 11

3.4.2 Cleaning the decking 12

3.4.3 Bar and fabric reinforcement 12

3.4.4 Placement 12

3.4.5 Finishing, curing and drying 13

Division of Civil Engineering, CUCEK


SEMINAR REPORT 2017

4. ADVANTAGES AND LIMITATIONS OF COMPOSITE SLAB


DECKING 14
4.1 Advantages 14

4.1.1 Speed 14

4.1.2 Working platform 14

4.1.3 Construction stage bracing 14

4.1.4 Weight 16

4.1.5 Height 16

4.2 Limitations 16

4.2.1 Respiratory hazards 16

4.2.2 Area 16

4.2.3 Skilled labour 16

5. CONCLUSION 17

6. REFERENCES 18

Division of Civil Engineering, CUCEK


SEMINAR REPORT 2017

LIST OF FIGURES

FIGURE NO. TITLE PAGE NO.

1 Examples of re entrant deck profiles used for composite 4


slabs

Examples of trapezoidal profiles with a shoulder height


2 5
of up to 60 mm

3 Sequence of design activities 8

4 Typical decking layout drawing 9

5 Installed acrow props 10

6 Shear connectors 11

7 Decking and fabric reinforcement 12

8 Pumping of concrete 13

9 Sequence of construction activity 15

Division of Civil Engineering, CUCEK


SEMINAR REPORT 2017

1. INTRODUCTION
Composite construction is a generic term to describe any building construction
involving multiple dissimilar materials. Composite construction is often used in building
aircraft, watercraft, and building construction. There are several reasons to use composite
materials including increased strength, aesthetics, and environmental sustainability. In
structural engineering, composite construction exists when two different materials are bound
together so strongly that they act together as a single unit from a structural point of view.
When this occurs, it is called composite action. One common example involves steel beams
supporting concrete floor slabs. Composite slabs consist of profiled steel decking with an in-
situ reinforced concrete topping. The decking not only acts as permanent formwork to the
concrete, but also provides sufficient shear bond with the concrete so that, when the concrete
has gained strength, the two materials act together compositely. As concrete is good in
compression and steel is good in tension, by joining the two materials together structurally
strengths can be exploited to result in a highly efficient design. Composite slabs and beams
are commonly used (with steel columns) in the commercial, industrial, leisure, health and
residential building sectors due to the speed of construction and general structural economy
that can be achieved. Although most commonly used on steel framed buildings, composite
slabs may also be supported off masonry or concrete components.
1.1 Need and scope
Composite construction has gained relevant importance in construction field. The
scope of this seminar is to study about composite slab and decking profiles used for
construction .Design and construction process of composite slab with steel decking is
explained in this report

2. DESIGN OF DECKING SLAB


2.1 General
The design of composite beams and slabs is clearly influenced by spanning
requirements, and the loads that are to be supported. In addition to grid layouts, it is therefore
important that accurate details of all the loads are established at an early stage. Unfortunately,
some information, such as the loads due to the services, is often unavailable when needed,

Division of Civil Engineering, CUCEK 1


SEMINAR REPORT 2017

and the Structural Designer has to use conservative values in order to give flexibility when the
services are designed at a later stage. Knowledge of the position of services is also important,
because it enables account to be taken of any opening requirements in the beam webs and/or
slabs. Openings can have a significant effect on the resistance of a member. The following list
is a guide to the information required to design the composite slabs:
 Column grid and beam general arrangement
 Position of slab edges
 Static and dynamic imposed loads(to include consideration of any temporary
concentrated loads from plant/machinery that may be required during construction)
 Services and finishes loads
 Special loads (e.g. walls, wind diaphragm loads)
 Fire resistance period
 Decking type (shallow or deep, re-entrant or trapezoidal)
 Slab depth limitations
 Minimum mass requirements (for acoustic performance)
 Location of openings
 Requirements for soffit appearance and general exposure
 Requirements for service fixings
 Requirements for cladding attachments (which may affect the slab edge detailing)
 Construction tolerances
 Deflection limits
 Propping requirements or restrictions
 Any known site restrictions on the use of thru-deck welding.
2.2 Design of steel decking
The steel decking has two main structural functions:
 During concreting, the decking supports the weight of the wet concrete and
reinforcement, together with the temporary loads associated with the construction
process. It is normally intended to be used without temporary propping.
 In service, the decking acts ‘compositely’ with the concrete to support the loads on
the floor. Composite action is obtained by shear bond and mechanical interlock
between the concrete and the decking. This is achieved by the embossments rolled

Division of Civil Engineering, CUCEK 2


SEMINAR REPORT 2017

into the decking – similar to the deformations formed in rebar used in a reinforced
concrete slab - and by any re-entrant parts in the deck profile.

The decking may also be used to stabilize the beams against lateral tensional buckling
during construction, and to stabilize the building as a whole by acting as a diaphragm to
transfer wind loads to the walls and columns (where it is designed to do so, and in particular
where there are adequate fixings). The decking, together with either welded fabric
reinforcement placed in the top of the slab or steel/synthetic fibers throughout the slab also
helps to control cracking of the concrete caused by shrinkage effects. The design is based on
Eurocodes. The design of the decking is defined in BS EN 1991-1-6.
Decking profiles are produced by a number of manufacturers in the UK. Although there
are similarities between their profiles, the exact shape and dimensions depend on the
particular manufacturer. There are two generic types of shallow decking; re-entrant (dovetail)
profiles and trapezoidal profiles. Examples of re-entrant profiles are shown in Fig.1.
Examples of trapezoidal profiles with a shoulder height of up to 60 mm are shown in Fig.2.
The traditional shallow decking profiles are between 45 to 60 mm high, with a rib spacing
usually of 150 to 333 mm. This type of decking typically spans 3 m, leading to frame grids of
9 m X 9 m or similar dimensions, using secondary beams at 3 m spacing, for which
temporary propping is usually not required. Profiles up to 95 mm high overall have been
developed which can achieve over 4.5 m spans without propping. Normally, the decking is
laid continuously over a number of spans, which makes it stronger and stiffer than over a
single span. More recently, a 160 mm (overall) profile has been developed which can span 6
m unpropped as a simply supported member.
The grades of steel used for decking are specified in BS EN 10326. The common grade in the
UK is S350 (the designation identifies the yield strength of the steel in N/mm2). Decking is
generally rolled from 0.9 to 1.2 mm thick strip steel. The spanning capability of a given
decking profile clearly increases as the steel thickness increases, but not in direct proportion
to the strength. The steel is galvanized before forming, and this is designated in the steel
grade by the letters GD, followed by a number corresponding to the number of grams of zinc
per m2. The normal specification is GD 275, i.e. 275 grams of zinc per m2, which results in a
thickness of approximately 0.02 mm per face (sufficient to achieve an excellent design life in

Division of Civil Engineering, CUCEK 3


SEMINAR REPORT 2017

internal applications with mild exposure conditions). Thicker galvanized coatings of 350
g/m2, and up to 600 g/m2, are available for special applications where improved durability is
needed, but specifications other than 275 g/m2 will be difficult to obtain and are likely to
require a large minimum order. ‘Thru-deck’ welding may also be affected. For this reason,
polyester paints are sometimes applied over the galvanizing to provide a longer service life.
Advice should be sought from the supplier/manufacturer when decking is to be used in a
moderate or severe environment.

.
Fig.1 Examples of re-entrant deck profiles used for composite slabs

Division of Civil Engineering, CUCEK 4


SEMINAR REPORT 2017

Fig.2 Examples of trapezoidal profiles with a shoulder height of up to 60 mm.

Division of Civil Engineering, CUCEK 5


SEMINAR REPORT 2017

2.3 Design of composite slabs


Composite slabs are normally used to span between 3 m and 4.5 m onto supporting
beams or walls. The ability of the decking to support the construction loads, without the need
for temporary propping, generally dictates such spans. Slab thicknesses are normally in the
range 100 mm to 250 mm for shallow decking, and in the range280 mm to 320 mm for deep
decking. When the concrete has gained sufficient strength, it acts in combination with the
tensile strength of the decking to form a ‘composite’ slab. It can be considered as a
reinforced concrete slab, using the decking as external reinforcement. The load carrying
capacity of composite slabs is normally dictated by the shear bond, enhanced by interlock,
between the decking and the concrete, rather than by yielding of the decking. From tests, it is
known that this shear bond generally breaks down when a ‘slip’ (relative displacement
between the decking and the concrete) of 2 to 3 mm has occurred at the ends of the span. In
practice, this will not occur below ultimate load levels. An initial slip, which is associated
with the breakdown of the chemical bond, may occur at a lower level of load. The interlock
resistance is therefore due to the performance of the embossments in the deck and the
presence of reentrant parts in the deck profile. Information on improving the bending
resistance of composite slabs by providing additional reinforcement, or end anchorage in the
form of shear connectors, can be found in BS EN 1994-1-1 and BS 5950-4. If the slab is
unpropped during construction, the decking alone resists the self weight of the wet concrete
and construction loads. Subsequent loads are applied to the composite section. If the slab is
propped, all of the loads have to be resisted by the composite section. Surprisingly, this can
lead to a reduction in the imposed load that the slab can support, because the applied
horizontal shear at the decking-concrete interface increases. However, for both unpropped
and propped conditions, load resistances well in excess of loading requirements for most
buildings can be achieved. Composite slabs are usually designed as simply supported
members in the normal condition, with no account taken of the continuity offered by any
reinforcement at the supports. Two methods of design are generally recognized, both of
which use empirically derived information on the ‘shear bond’ resistance of the slab from
uniformly distributed loading arrangements. The more traditional method, and one which is
given in both BS EN 1994-1-1 and BS 5950-4, is the so-called ‘m and k’ method. However,

Division of Civil Engineering, CUCEK 6


SEMINAR REPORT 2017

this method has limitations and is not particularly suitable for the analysis of concentrated
line and point load conditions. An alternative method of design is included in the Eurocode,
which is based on the principles of partial shear connection. This method provides a more
logical approach to determine the slab’s resistance to applied concentrated line or point
loadings. It is not normally necessary for designers to understand the design methodology in
detail, as manufacturers normally present the design data in the form of load span tables, but
these are only applicable for uniformly loaded conditions.The design sequence described in
fig.3

3. METHODOLOGY
3.1 General
The construction of composite slab is same as that of conventional slab. The concrete
is placed above profiled steel deck which acts as a permanent shuttering during the life span
of the composite slab. The steel frame is constructed at first according to the design and after
this the decking sheets are fixed. So if structural frame for multiple levels are constructed,
then the slab can be casted simultaneously for multiple floor.
3.2 Decking layout drawing
Decking layout drawings should be available for those lifting the decking , so that the
bundles can be positioned correctly around the frame. Clearly, they should also be available
for the deck laying team. Although different decking contractors’ drawing details may vary
slightly, the drawings should show each floor divided into bays, where a bay is an area that is
to be laid from a bundle as one unit. Bays are normally indicated on the drawing using a
diagonal line. The number of sheets and their length should be written against the diagonal
line. The bundle reference may also be detailed against this diagonal line. Further
construction notes for the bay can be referenced using numbers in circles drawn on the
diagonal lines. Fig. 4 shows a decking layout drawing.

Division of Civil Engineering, CUCEK 7


SEMINAR REPORT 2017

Building arrangement
chosen by Client/Architect

Choose column grids/beam Consider likely decking, slab


arrangement and beam span capability

Choose type of floor Consider construction depth,


construction, e.g. slimfloor, service requirements, need for
composite beam + slab an exposed soffit?

Consider fire resistance period,


Choose concrete type and
availability of concrete type
grade, slab depth
durability

Design as composite
beam? Consider:
Access for welding equipment
YES Electrical earthing
Economic No. of shear connectors
Choose type of connector Can top flange of beams be left unpainted?
and when to be welded Alternatives to stud connectors
Site or shop welding

NO Consider:
Construction loading, dead weight
Concrete ponding deflections
Propping, effects of propping on fall arrest
Design floor decng and system
check at construction stage Single or continuous spans

Consider:
Fire resistance period
Check composite slab and In-service loading, e.g. solid partitions,
design reinforcement concentrated loads
Temporary construction loading, e.g. from
MEWPs
Design reinforcement at
openings in slab

For composite beams:


Design beams Determine shear connector layout and
design transverse reinforcement

Fig.3 Sequence of design activities

Division of Civil Engineering, CUCEK 8


SEMINAR REPORT 2017

Fig.4 Typical decking layout drawing (shear connector and fastener information omitted)
3.3 Components
3.3.1 Temporary supports

Decking is usually designed to be unpropped for spans up to 3 m for profile up to 60


mm deep, and up to 4.5 m for profiles 80 mm deep. For longer spans temporary propping
may be required, but this will depend on the depth of the concrete, the profile used and
whether the decking is multiple or single spanning. The limitations of a particular decking
should be checked with the manufacturer at an early stage so that any propping requirement
can be planned. The structural designer should check whether beam deflections during
construction and the method of leveling of the slab would lead to significant additional
concrete loads (from concrete ponding) that have not been allowed for in the design of the
structure and decking . Propping may be necessary to minimize ponding. In general,
traditional ‘shallow’ decking spanning greater than 4m will require the propping system to be
in place, braced and levelled, before placing the decking. Propping will reduce the
deflections from the self-weight of the decking,which would otherwise be difficult to remove

Division of Civil Engineering, CUCEK 9


SEMINAR REPORT 2017

if props were installed after laying the decking. It will also minimize the risk of overloading
the decking under loads during construction, e.g. from operatives and storage, but the
implications of using design which requires propping should be/considered at an early stage,
because it can have sequence and programming implications, and can preclude the use of
safety netting. When temporary propping is positioned after the decking is placed, it is
particularly important to check that the props are set in accordance with the Structural
Designer’s requirements, and that the increased weight due to concrete ponding is allowed
for in the design of the propping system. There may be small areas in a building where
propping is necessary, even when the main areas of the floor remain unpropped. These
propped areas may include bays that are in-filled after the removal of climbing cranes, or lift
shafts which have non-standard span lengths.
Normally , props are placed at either mid-span (one line of props) or at third points
(2 lines of props) within a span. Isolated props should not be used, and all props should be
suitably braced (in the direction of the line of the props and perpendicular to this) to prevent
dislodgement during construction operations. Props normally consist of lengths of timber
and/or steel plates supported by adjustable length steel tubes (‘Acrows’). The minimum
bearing length of the timber and/or plates depends upon the thickness of the slab, the span
length and the decking rib geometry. Bearing lengths are typically in the 75 to 100 mm
range. The timber bearer should be continuous, and should extend the full width of the bay.
The decking sheets should never be interrupted (cut) at the location of a temporary support,
and the decking should not be fastened to the temporary supports. It is good practice to carry
out a final check of the propping system before pouring the concrete. A typical temporary
support is shown in Fig.5.

Fig.5 Acrow props

Division of Civil Engineering, CUCEK 10


SEMINAR REPORT 2017

3.3.2 Connectors

The most common type of shear connector used in composite beams for buildings is a
19mm diameter by either 100mm or 125mm long welded stud. For thru deck welding, this is
the only stud diameter that can be used practically ,because it is the only one for which
suitable ferules are available. Although other heights are available, they are not so easy to
obtain. There are a number of other forms of shear connector available, such as angles
welded to the top flange. However, most lack a practical application in composite beams,
with the exception of shot-fired connectors. These should be considered for smaller projects,
those where beams need to be galvanized or top flanges painted for reasons of durability, or
indeed any project where the provision of power for stud welding is a problem. They may be
particularly appropriate for refurbishment projects, where there is either limited access or no
earthing facility. The most common shot-fired shear connector is that produced by Hilti,
which is available in heights of 95 mm to 140 mm. It should be noted that a shot-fired
connector has less resistance than a welded stud. Fig.6 shows a shear connector connecting
decking sheet, concrete and supporting beam.

Fig.6 Shear connector

3.4 Casting process


3.4.1 Preparation

Prior to beginning work on the decking, guard rails should be in position at all
perimeters, internal edges and voids.The positions of any props(and back props)should be
checked against the details shown on the decking layout drawing to ensure that the required
support has been provided.

Division of Civil Engineering, CUCEK 11


SEMINAR REPORT 2017

3.4.2 Cleaning the decking


The surface of the decking should be reasonably free of dirt , oil prior to concreting.
The slight surface grease that is present on the decking when it is delivered to site does not
affect the interaction between the concrete and steel, and therefore need not be removed.
Though recommended, it is not essential to clean out all the broken ceramic ferrules from
stud welding.
3.4.3 Bar and Fabric (Mesh) Reinforcement
All bar/fabric reinforcement should be properly supported so that it does not become
displaced during concreting. Plastic stools, loops or preformed fabric may be used as ‘chairs’,
but not plastic channels, which can induce cracking. Chairs should be robust, because
operatives will need to use the floor as a working platform for themselves and their
equipment. In particular, the handling and movement of concrete-filled pipes during pumping
can cause significant local impacts on the fabric reinforcement. Although a slight depression
(up to 15 mm) of the fabric may occur during concreting, the performance of the slab is not
affected significantly by this. An example of a floor with the reinforcement in place and
ready for casting is shown in Fig.7.

Fig.7 Decking and fabric reinforcement – ready for casting the concrete
3.4.4 Placement
Pumping has become the normal way of placing concrete , and can be adopted for
both normal and lightweight aggregate mixes. Flow rates in the order of 0.5 to 1 m3 of
concrete per minute can be achieved, although, clearly, the longer the pump lines and the
higher the concrete is to be pumped, the slower the operation. A pump can normally ‘lift’ the
concrete up to 30 m. Secondary pumps, placed at intermediate levels, may be necessary for

Division of Civil Engineering, CUCEK 12


SEMINAR REPORT 2017

higher lifts. Pump lines are normally 150 mm in diameter and are assembled in segments.
Because the force exerted at bends can be significant, straight line pumping is preferred. The
lines should be supported on timber blocks at intervals of 2 to 3 m. Resetting of pump lines is
required at frequent intervals as the pour progresses. This means that the outlet pipe should
be moved frequently and carefully so that concrete heaping is minimised. A minimum of two
operatives are necessary for this operation, one to hold and manoeuvre the outlet pipe, the
other to shovel away excess concrete. No more than 4 workmen should be present around the
pipe outlet during pumping, because of the potential for overloading the decking. The
concrete should not be dropped from the outlet pipe onto the decking from a height of more
than about 1 m.

Fig.8 Pumping of concrete


3.4.5 Finishing, curing and drying
The concrete surface finish is normally specified by the Structural Designer. If
power-floating is to be carried out, this should be done within 2-3 hours of casting. This
allows time for the concrete to sufficiently harden. Experience shows that there is a high risk
that well trowelled surfaces will exhibit crazing. Crazing is the term used to describe an
irregular polygonal pattern of fine interconnected cracks which often occur on power

Division of Civil Engineering, CUCEK 13


SEMINAR REPORT 2017

trowelled concrete surfaces. Crazing should not be considered a defect and it generally has
no adverse effect on the performance of the floor surface. Although concrete normally gains
strength relatively quickly, it is necessary to keep temperatures above 5°C for at least 3 days
after pouring. When concreting during the winter months, loss of heat, such as by radiation
from the lower surface of the decking at night, can be significant. It may then be necessary to
use space-heaters to maintain the temperature. Some heat is generated during setting, or
‘hydration’, of the concrete (this raises the temperature by 3 to 5°C, typically). The moisture
in the concrete should not be allowed to evaporate too early, otherwise the surface may lose
its integrity, forming dust and possibly cracking, and it will not have a good abrasion
resistance. The slab therefore needs to be ‘cured’ by covering the surface with polythene
sheeting for 3 to 7 days, depending on the weather (this is particularly important in warm or
windy weather). Alternatively, the concrete may be sprayed with a proprietary curing
compound. Because the concrete is only exposed on one surface of a composite floor, it can
take longer than a traditional reinforced concrete slab to dry out. The sequence of composite
floor construction is shown in Fig.9

4. ADVANTAGES AND LIMITATIONS OF COMPOSITE


SLAB DECKING

4.1 Advantages
4.1.1 Speed
Large areas of deck can be rapidly craned into position and up to 400m2 laid by one
team per day.With minimal mesh reinforcement and pumped concrete ,they completed floor
can quickly follow.

4.1.2 Working platform


Once laid the deck acts as a safe working platform for all following trades.
Temporary props can usually be eliminated
4.1.3 Construction stage bracing

Division of Civil Engineering, CUCEK 14


SEMINAR REPORT 2017

The deck acts as lateral restraint to the beams and acts as a diaphragm ,transmitting
wind load from the outer steelwork to the core .Thus once the decking is fixed ,it contributes
significantly to the stability of the structure .
Erect steel frame

Offload and hoist packs


into

Install props
Are props required YES Install fall arrest
prior to placing system (nets not
decking? appropriate)

Install fall arrest system

Position floor deck edge


trims
and end closures and fix to
steelwork

Fix shear connectors, if any

Are props required YES


prior to casting Install props
slab?
Fix: Reinforcement at slab openings
and cantilevers, transverse
reinforcement, mesh Fix reinforcement NO
reinforcement, and ‘fire’
reinforcement, as necessary
y
Form slab
Limit ppotential for
grout loss constructionjoints

Including fiber reinforcement, Place concrete


when specified

Prepare slab surface

Consider concrete strength


Carry out additional cube tests Remove props
Consult structural designer

Fig.9 Sequence of construction activities

Division of Civil Engineering, CUCEK 15


SEMINAR REPORT 2017

4.1.4 Weight
Due to the intrinsic efficiency of composite construction and the displacement of
concrete by the profile shape, considerably less concrete is used than in conventional
reinforced concrete construction .This reduces both the primary structure and foundations.
4.1.5 Height
Composite beams use the slab as a compression element, which increases their
stiffness and reduces their size. The composite slab itself has a very low centre of
reinforcement compared to a conventionally reinforced slab and therefore does not need the
same depth .These savings translate to a reduced floor zone and thus overall floor height.
4.2 Limitations
4.2.1 Respiratory hazards
The decking sheets are subjected to chemical process to resist corrosion .If the sheets
are zinc coated it can cause respiratory hazard for the workers .The dust and sound produced
during cutting of sheets may cause health problems.
4.2.2 Area
The use of composite slab for small area is not economical. It is economical for big
projects.As cost of construction materials is more than conventional methods, it is
economical only because of the reduction in construction time and labour charge .
4.2.3 Skilled labour
As the construction procedure includes welding and other joineries, skilled labour is
required for this type of construction .

Division of Civil Engineering, CUCEK 16


SEMINAR REPORT 2017

5. CONCLUSION
Composite slab construction is structurally efficient because it exploits the tensile
resistance of steel sheet and the compressive resistance of concrete. The concrete- steel
structure with incomplete interaction represents a progressive trend in development of
structural members such that they can perform superior economy and safety. Even though the
material cost is high compared to conventional method, the overall cost of composite
construction is less than conventional method when time and labour is considered. Composite
construction is a faster and economical construction technique which is a need for future.

Division of Civil Engineering, CUCEK 17


SEMINAR REPORT 2017

6. REFERENCES
1. K.N.Lakashmikandhan and P. Sivakumar, Hindawi Publishing Corporation
Journal of Structures ,Volume 2013, Article ID 628759

2. K.M.A. Hossain, Professor , S. Alam, Post-doctoral, High performance composite


slabs with profiled steel deck and Engineered Cementitious Composite – Strength and
shear bond characteristics, Construction and Building Materials 125 (2016) 227–240

3. N. Rehman, D. Lam , X. Dai, A.F. Ashour, Experimental study on demountable shear


connectors in composite slabs with profiled decking, Journal of Constructional Steel
Research 122 (2016) 178–189

4. Danièle Waldmann , Andreas May, Influence of the sheet profile design on the
composite action of slabs made of lightweight woodchip concrete, Construction and
Building Materials 148 (2017) 887–899

5. Josef Holomeka, Miroslav Bajera, Cast Screws as Shear Anchors for Composite
Slabs, Procedia Engineering 195 ( 2017 ) 114 – 119

Division of Civil Engineering, CUCEK 18


SEMINAR REPORT 2017

Division of Civil Engineering, CUCEK 19

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen